#Juristical

[genioushardcore]

@genioushardcore #LegitOrNot #Legit

GeniousHardcore, legitim oder nicht?

Samples basieren auf eigenen Vocals, oder Sounds, welche selbst aufgenommen wurden. Andere sind aus einer Liste, Public Domain sf2 (Sound Font2) Über Google Suche gefunden.

Software komplette Liste, möglich:

Videobearbeitung: (Lifetime-Lizenz aus einem Weihnachts-Sale)

Auch erhältlich für PC: https://filmora.wondershare.net

früher genutzt,wegen Abo-Vertrag gekündigt: inShot https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.camerasideas.instashot

Musik-DAW (Digital Audio Workstation Open Source Software): lmms.io

VSTi-Plugins:

Multitrack-Recorder (Open Source Software): Audacity.org

Auch genutzt um die eigenen Samples zu recorden…

gekaufte Lifetime-Lizenz: Mirror Lab  (Bildbearbeitung & Stumme Video-Sequenzen)

Aus einem Beta-Programm, keine gekaufte Lizenz, wäre aber nötig, für weiteren Betrieb: Vocoder-App: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jazarimusic.voloco

OpenSource Tool, für Live-Desktop-Hintergründe: https://www.chip.de/downloads/Lively_182810027.html

Screen-Recorder-App für Windows 10, aus dem Microsoft Store:

Screen Recorder Pro Link, zum Hersteller: https://github.com/MatthewSachin

Anderes Tool:

Screen Recorder: screen-recorder.convertaudiofiles.com

Name, des Herstellers: winuwp

Aus steam: www.steampowered.com ShareX

Sonder-Lizenz, bzgl. Crossing Freestyle Rap: Kommunikation mit den entsprechenden Produzenten erfolgte teils via Twitter.com zu nennen seien: @djschmolli

Via Soundcloud.com , bevor man den eigenen Account löschte, mit Voicedude versuchte Kommunikation mit chocomang , scheiterte, aber The Sex Pistols wurden anteilsmäßig erreicht, Aber leider nur, via Funk, sprachen eher dafür, als dagegen.

WINff Winff.org (Open Source, Video-/-Music-Converter) GPL

FFMPEG for Android (Video-Converter) enthält Werbung.

[tenbeast2]

Charlie Jurist

[yourdailyqueer]

Hanke Bruins Slot

Gender: Female

Sexuality: Lesbian

DOB: 20 October 1977

Ethnicity: White - Dutch

Occupation: Politician (CDA), jurist, veteran

[ot3]

In Justice for All when Edgeworth returned and saw Phoenix for the first time, Phoenix seemed genuinely disgusted by him, thinking him a coward who only cared about Perfection just like Manfred. Phoenix probably really hated Edge for that year but all the fanworks i see are him just being like "oh miles I'm so glad ur not dead :)". Where are the twisted emotions?? Where is your rage????

that's an absolutely perfect moment to hone in on because as I've mentioned a couple of times in the past that was the exact moment where ace attorney injected itself permanently into my brain. I was fully expecting phoenix to be grateful and relieved to have Edgeworth back and offering him assistance at a time of crisis no matter how douchey he was about it, and so when he snapped instead I was completely blindsided and overjoyed. Like that was the moment when narumitsu went from Good to Superb for me because suddenly there is this entire other layer to the dynamic. I love a (un)healthy dose of resentment in any ship because I love when characters love each other despite having very good reasons not too so that bit was just. So good. Narumitsu getting the Sunshine One and Grumpy One treatment is so frustrating because phoenix has soooooo much more depth to him than that and he's my fave so it sucks to see how many people will just completely take him at face value

[echotunes]

Wenn man ne Weile lang Vorlesungen über Recht besucht, kommt es einem irgendwann so vor, als hätten Juristen einfach zu viel Zeit irgendwie. Also klar macht ne gute Geschichte aber mein Dozent aus Grundrechte hat heute ausführlichst erzählt, wie er und ein paar ehemalige Kollegen sich so ziemlich zum Spaß bis zum Bundesverfassungsgericht durchgeklagt haben. und da ist es irgendwann auch nur noch like. bro. ??

[longdeadking]

i think everyone is overloking the fact that the seven year gap perfectly lines up with covid. i know we're all a little tired of it and writing about covid can be hard and depressing but CONSIDER. on top of all the other shit phoenix is dealing with he also has to be in lockdown

[void-pitcher]

beanix has some fae level bullshitting skills down to the never lying (except for the bit)

[scificrows]

"At some point, after the house had quieted, Grandmaman's jurist arrived. 'Ah, Mx Athtur. I'm so sorry for your loss. I know you loved your grandmother very much, and spent your life attending to her. You should be allowed to take some time to yourself right now, and grieve.' He didn't overtly direct this to Zemil, sitting in the armchair across from Enae, but his words seemed intended for her."

- Ann Leckie, Translation State

[mabeh]

Goldene Zeiten (2006)

[tigers1o1]

Talk to me, boy.

About Chip or fnc or polypirates or demonkicks or just jrwi in general please I want to talk to people send me asks so I can speak to you

[probablygayattorneys]

Good day to read a good book with the perfect soundtrack for it.

[v-67]

I was studying Jurisprudence for my exam, and it's actually so interesting.

I mean I keep everything that I have to study for exams, but I do understand the concepts

The language I write in may not construct a guidelike answer, but atleast it makes me happy to know that I know the concept and the clarity regarding the concepts.

But anyways, back here

Jurisprudence is actually so much interesting.

So many theories, so many schools, felt like a pain in the ass while covering up the syllabus

But it's all genuinely so interesting.

Natural law school believes in divine law

Socrates, Plato, Aristotle were Greek philosophers who contributed to this theory

Socrates defined virtue, Plato introduced Doctrine of forms, Aristotle added more specifics to doctrine of forms while agreeing and disagreeing to some of the specifications made by Plato.

Analytical law school studies what is law and not what law ought to be

So many philosophers/jurists in this theory with their own different aspects.

John Austin : Gave the theory that : Laws are commands of the sovereign backed by sanction.

Jeremy Bentham : Utilitarian theory

H.L.A. Hart : Divided law into Primary and secondary rules

Hans Kelsen : pure theory of law, fun fact : Kelsen was also known as doubly pure because of his theory.

Historical school studies origin and development of law throughout the history.

Important Jurists : Savigny, Henry Maine

Sociological school studies sociological impact of law on society and how it affects a common individual.

Realist school.

Now this one.

It caught my attention because of how it's theory is.

One Scandinavian jurist talks about how Law is nothing but a psychological pressure created through times immemorial.

One such example is that when a classmate tells me that there's an exam tomorrow. It won't be taken as seriously as when the same information comes through the official notification of college.

Official notification in this context is one such example of psychological pressure in action.

It is rooted in the subconscious through history. This pressure created through history created a subconscious pressure to take official notifications, statutes, an authoritative body seriously, and to follow such laws or directions imposed by them.

Now, do you understand how crazy this is?

I mean it's really simple but it was something I never thought of.

We can connect this theory of psychological pressure to a lot of things. I'm a lot sleep deprived at the very moment, but if something comes to my mind, I'll write it down.

Because it's a topic that interests me, and it's so fun to think about it in regards to what more can it be?

One more Jurist tells us within this school, that The right you talk about exists only in metaphysical sense.

But if supposedly, I go to practice my right in court, I'll have to follow court's obligations.

But what if I don't follow court's obligations/ what If I couldn't follow it? Does that mean that I don't have a right?

And even after a case being heard by a judge, what if the ruling is not in our favor, does that mean we don't have rights?

Therefore as an example, Right can be considered as a metaphysical concept, for in that it never really exists in actuality.

This school focuses more on how law operates in the real world.

It also focuses on points such as, Judges are also humans and being a human, they can have bias, may it be conscious/subconscious

Therefore law studies how law is in real world and how it works and how is it applied and so on.

It concerns itself with reality of the law and world.

One example of Judges being humans and how it affects a law is that

Suppose a case arising dispute regarding abortion arises, and the judge is a Christian judge. In this case, the judge cannot give an order without some bias, as in Christianity abortion is not supported.

So my point was that Juris is really interesting, the theories are so complex and this question to define what law is and different ways to study it

Especially to study it since the ancient time, since the time of Socrates and still coming up with definitive meanings and theories and criticisms. I like it. It's complex I know, but it is that constant change and new way approach that keeps law changing, and accustoming new ways of thinking.

So yeah, loved it.

Cool theories.

[tmarshconnors]

“The price of freedom of religion or of speech or of the press is that we must put up with, and even pay for, a good deal of rubbish.”

Robert Houghwout Jackson was an American lawyer, jurist, and politician who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1941 until his death in 1954.

Born: 13 February 1892, Spring Creek Township, Pennsylvania, United States

Died: 9 October 1954 (age 62 years), Washington, D.C., United States

Supreme Court Justice: Robert H. Jackson served as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1941 to 1954. He was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Nuremberg Trials: Jackson is perhaps best known for his role as the chief United States prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II. These trials were historic as they prosecuted major Nazi war criminals for crimes against humanity, war crimes, and genocide.

Legal Career: Before his appointment to the Supreme Court, Jackson held several significant positions, including Solicitor General (1938-1940) and Attorney General (1940-1941). His tenure in these roles was marked by his strong defense of New Deal legislation.

Influential Opinions: As a Supreme Court Justice, Jackson authored several important opinions. Notably, in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), he wrote the majority opinion that declared it unconstitutional to force public school students to salute the flag, emphasizing the protection of individual rights against government mandates.

Literary Style: Jackson was renowned for his eloquent and clear writing style. His opinions are often cited for their literary quality and persuasive power. His legal writings continue to be studied and admired for their clarity and rhetorical force.

[reachartwork]

Saint of Judgment

One of the few cybersaints with an active role in the World Government, along with the other Eight Gentle Jurists, the bull-horned Saint of Judgment is an enactor of the will of the courts. With a flourish of his massive painted blade, he decides the outcome of capital offenses.

Find out more about the Cybersaints here

[mekatrio]

my imaginary aa4 followup will probably have to be 3 cases long instead of 2.... gwuh.....

[pmamtraveller]

THE JURIST, (1566) by GIUSEPPE ARCIMBOLDO

THE JURIST is an eye-wrenching portrayal of a lawyer. His head is composed of poultry and fish, and his body is composed of legal documents. In previous portraits (LIKE FOUR ELEMENTS), ARCIMBOLDO had used collaged elements to portray the nobility and good will of his patrons, but in this portrait, the aim is to deceive and slander.

Using meat and poultry to construct the lawyer’s face shows the artist’s attitude toward his subject. The lawyer’s facial expression is sneering, and his very body is composed of what’s believed to be decaying meat. Especially repulsive are the fish-bone beard, the fish tail beard and the beheaded frog nose.

However, according to the SWEDISH NATIONAL MUSEUM, the painting depicts the German jurist ULRICH ZASIUS, Vice-Chancellor to MAXIMILIAN II, and if the portrait does depict ZASIUS, the poor quality in which it has been painted may reflect his reputation as a scoundrel in the service of the Emperor, who was the first person to view this portrait.