#Judeo-Bolshevism

[savage-kult-of-gorthaur]

TROOPS OF DOOM WILL SPREAD JUDEO-BOLSHEVISM -- PIECE BY PIECE BY PIECE.

PIC INFO: Spotlight on a postcard first published in 1939 titled "Bolschewismus ohne Maske" ("Bolshevism Unmasked"), with an illustration of a Communist soldier attempting to rule the world with a hammer and sickle against the backdrop of a yellow star of David, implying the Nazi opinion that Jews were behind the Communist phenomenon.

FULL OVERVIEW: "Not everyone who had read "Mein Kampf" took seriously the rabid outpouring of filth and hatred it contained. But in his own words, Hitler described how his eyes had been opened at an early age to the "two menaces" which threatened the existence of the German people: Communists and Jews.

These two objects of his hatred would become, after his seizure of power, subjected unrelentingly to vicious propaganda and heinous persecution. That Marxism, or Bolshevism, was to Hitler a "doctrine of destruction" which itself must be destroyed for the survival of all Germans may be seen plainly in the picture on this official postcard from the Great Anti-Bolshevist Exhibit organized by Goebbels' Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.

"Bolshevism unmasked," reads the inscription over a world engulfed in red flame and branded with a hammer-and-sickle in the center of a yellow Jewish Star, recalling Hitler's rant in "Mein Kampf" that "in Russian Bolshevism we must see the attempt undertaken by the Jews in the twentieth century to achieve world domination!" A ghostly image of Death as an armed revolutionary clutches in both hands its weapons of destruction. The exhibition was held in Vienna in 1939. Six years earlier Communists had been among the first of those countless victims rounded up for the concentration camps."

-- UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON

Source: https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AFEMLOIYBU6FPX9A.

[txttletale]

hey everybody. we're glad everyone's been enjoying politics! to keep things interesting and keep the meta balanced we'll be implementing these new ideologies in 2024:

peronism with chinese characteristics

twitch streamer philosopher kingship

absolute military junta (sortition-based)

hunnic nationalism

anarcho-sharia

marxism-leninism-maoism-klobucharism (primarily klobucharism)

three chinas policy

antitranshumanist trans humanism

puppygirl rights activism

representative shogunate

pan-midwesternism

tetsuya yamagami thought

liberal arts college technate

discordian-thelemite lebanon-style religious powersharing

armed insurrectionary incremental reformism

narcotheocracy

sex-positive feudalism

social democratic taliban entryism

badism-worseism

believing in judeo-bolshevism but thinking it was a good thing

ineffective altruism

[notaplaceofhonour]

It’s maddening to find out that the scholar who first developed the idea that “Zionism is Settler Colonialism”, Fayez Sayegh, was a member of the Syrian Nazi Party during and immediately after the Holocaust, was an active participant in the Red Scare, using it to demonize Israel as a manifestation of a Global Communist Threat™️ through the height of the Cold War (true to his Nazi roots, accusing Israel of Judeo-Bolshevism) before switching to a Colonialism narrative when Post-Colonialism came in vogue in the 60s. And yet, the people I hear parroting the talking points of this anti-Communist, Ultranationalist Fascist-turned-scholar are the people who are constantly talking about how Liberal Progressives aren’t Communist enough and actually enemies because “Liberals will always side with Fascists”. Maddening.

If you’ve ever noticed how the “Zionism = Settler Colonialism” narrative eerily shares the core components of the far right’s Replacement Theory (that there are 1. Jews 2. conspiring to invade a given place and 3. replace the population with Jews), this is why; it’s because the idea that Zionism is Settler Colonialism came from a literal Nazi.

It is very literally Nazi propaganda.

[queerism1969]

Atrocity created by CAPITALISM

Irish Famine (1845-1852)

Indian Famines during British colonial rule (Various, 18th-20th centuries)

Indigenous Genocide (Ongoing since colonization)

Slavery (16th-19th centuries)

Indonesian Genocide (1965-1966)

Pinochet Dictatorship (1973-1990)

Argentina Dictatorship (1976-1983)

Brazilian Dictatorship (1964-1985)

Pakistan Incident (Bangladesh Genocide, 1971)

The Gilded Age (Late 19th century)

The Great Depression (1929-1939)

Operation Condor (1960s-1980s)

Banana Wars (Early 20th century)

Batista Dictatorship (1952-1959)

Guantanamo Bay (Ongoing since 2002)

Vietnam War (1955-1975)

My Lai Massacre (1968)

Sinchon Massacre (Korean War, 1950-1953)

Kent State Massacre (1970)

Patriot Act (2001)

Red Summer (1919)

Jim Crow (Late 19th-20th centuries)

MK Ultra (1950s-1970s)

1985 MOVE bombing (1985)

1921 Battle of Blair Mountain (1921)

Malayan Emergency (1948-1960)

Mau Mau Rebellion (1952-1960)

Covert war in Yemen (Ongoing)

Stanley Meyer incident (1998)

Genocide in Turkey (Armenian Genocide and others, WWI era)

Congolese Genocide (Late 19th-20th centuries)

Greek Civil War (1946-1949)

Invasion of Cyprus by Turkey (1974)

Washita River Massacre (1868)

Minamata Disaster (1950s-1960s)

Bhopal Disaster (1984)

Kentler Project (1960s-2003)

Thomas Midgley Jr. and leaded gasoline (Early 20th century)

Forced labor in private US prisons (Ongoing)

Collateral murder in Iraq (2010)

Julian Assange and leaks (Ongoing)

US drone strikes (Ongoing)

US sanctions (Ongoing)

US support for dictatorships (Ongoing)

Korean War and civilian casualties (Korean War, 1950-1953)

Nazi funding and collaboration (WWII era)

Hitler and "Judeo-Bolshevism" (WWII era)

[sissa-arrows]

Americans who plan on voting for Kamala thinking the lesser of two evils is a solution need to take a serious look at France.

Macron was the “lesser of two evils” the first time. By the second time we knew the solution was to kick him out because he was NOT the lesser of two evils but too many white people kept believing in his lesser of two evils bullshit.

You know what’s happening now? The left won the election in the beginning of July. Macron chose to ignore it.

Macron chose a prime minister from the party that got the 4th place at the election. That party is a far right party labeled just right wing. Yesterday we got the new government chosen by that prime minister.

The Home Secretary believes that colonialism had great positive aspects (on the indigenous population) and that “Africans want for France to not repent and to accept that there was positive aspects and to take back its leadership in Africa”. He is also against making “forced conversion therapy” illegal against LGBT+ people.

The Higher education and Research Secretary, believes that “Islamoleftism” is a problem and a threat in higher education and that it must be fought against (Judeo-Bolshevism is so 1917-1945 so France switched things up a couple years ago). He also voted against putting abortion right in the French constitution and against gay marriage.

The Secretary of State against Discrimination was going to change its name to include the protection of secularism (which in France means the protection of Islamophobia and even supporting and being an islamophobe) after a pushback it looks like it wasn’t included in the name BUT it will still be one of his jobs. So the guy chosen supported Stanislas a private catholic schools who was involved in a scandal about favoring students but also about encouraging homophobia, Islamophobia and sexism in the school. He also believes that racism and homophobia exist in France like everywhere else but that very few people are racists or homophobes and that the real problem for minorities is the left who accuses people of being racists and/or homophobes. He thinks that there’s a problem with immigrants and immigration in France and that mass immigration must be stopped (for the record if you respect the Tumblr rules every single one of you was born before he got his French citizenship). But hey he is Moroccan so apparently it automatically means he ain’t racist and anti immigrants. (Say whatever you want about France but this country is hella good at finding the sell outs in each community)

I could go on and on about these three and about the rest of the government. Some of them want to go back on the legalization of gay marriage, how some of them want to make the access to universities and any public space to women with a hijab which will quickly turn into a ban for Arab and Black women to wear baggy clothes as a whole in public spaces…. But I will stop here.

All I have to say is that voting for the lesser of two evils even when people were saying that the lesser of two evils was still a danger for People of color and LGBT+ people turned France into Germany before WW2 except the targets are Muslims and people indentified as Muslims instead of Jews. But go on and vote for Kamala if you want but don’t say that nobody warned you and don’t pretend to be all righteous.

[racefortheironthrone]

Maybe this is too broad, but wondering if there's a better term than "conspiracy theorist" to describe some large figures in the ongoing national discourse? Not that "fluoride in the drinking crowd" were serious thinkers or total harmless, but am I alone is finding "conspiracy theory" too quaint and mild to describe how mainstream rather fringe these things are and also how totally evidence-free and something just plain dumb they can also be?

I don’t think conspiracy theories have ever been quaint and mild.

Think about the history of antisemitism from medieval blood libels to 19th century theories of Jewish financial cabals to the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” dreamed up by Tsarist agents-provocateur that took the theory global and spawned untold numbers of imitators, to Hitler’s invention of “Judeo-Bolshevism” that married traditional antisemitism to anti-Communism and nationalist populism. Conspiracy theories one and all, but fully capable of spawning pogroms and fascist dictatorships.

Likewise, we think of Anti-Masonic or Illuminati conspiracy theories as self-evidently ridiculous and harmless, but we forget that they were used by cultural conservatives in church and state to wage culture wars on the Enlightenment, liberalism, secularism, democracy, every revolution from America to France to 1848 and beyond, feminism and almost every social movement of the 18th and 19th century. People died or were surveilled or were sent to prison, political parties were formed or banned, and conservatism itself was founded in the name of “poisoning the minds of the lower orders” to inoculate them from the influence of secret societies.

As Dan Olsen has shown, even seemingly benign conspiracy theories like the JFK assassination cover-up or the Moon landing was faked or the earth is flat can hide much more malign motivations, just waiting for the opportunity to radicalize and proselytize:

[germiyahu]

And I'm sure the Cossacks also believed they were fighting back against some kind of Jewish Threat to the poor Christian supermajority in their country... just like the Einsatzgruppen believed they were saving Europe from Judeo-Bolshevism or what the fuck ever.

I don't really care how well thought one's motivations are when going from Jewish village to Jewish village, and massacring people, raping them, torturing them, murdering them, mutilating them, burning down their homes, forcing whoever was left to flee (or kidnapping them). Don't forget they often documented the whole affair with the relevant technology at the time, yes pogromists in Russia took photos posing with the people they murdered like they were game they had hunted. And all this while the local non Jewish civilians cheered and also pretty often took the homes that weren't destroyed, along with other property, possessions, and wealth.

Like, I really don't care actually? When you commit nearly identical forms of violence against Jews as groups universally recognized as antisemites you forfeit the right to wag your finger at the Jews who connect those dots and form those patterns and call it exactly what it is? Sorry I guess?

[jewish-sideblog]

hey uh goy here. if it isn't too much trouble, could you talk about some of those jewish communist groups you mentioned? i like to think of myself as a communist but i havent really had time to sink my teeth in much of any communist discussions or posts or what have you since pretty much every communist blog i used to follow has. uhm. well. I'm sure i don't need to remind you of what happened.

thanks in advance.

For sure! To my knowledge, the major Israeli socialist/communist groups that exist today are Hadash and Maki, which form a coalition with moderate two-state Arab nationalist Ta'al in the Knesset. The Kibbutz movements also tend to be communist when not religiously oriented, what with them being communes and all. I'm not Israeli myself, so there may be larger Israeli communist groups in the country that I'm not aware of.

As far as historical Jewish communists go, I'd recommend starting by looking into the Bundists and other Jewish groups in the Soviet Eastern-European era.

Jews in the diaspora today don't have any major and public Jewish communist groups that I'm aware of. Because, of, you know, the happenings. But plenty of us are still in red politics as individuals.

This is nothing against you, anon, but it's fascinating to me how far apart the political spectrum can still be. I forget that left-leaning politics often aren't aware of Jewish communist groups because right-leaning politics hyperfocus on Judeo-Bolshevism and antisemitic red scare conspiracy theories.

Thank you for reaching out!

[collapsedsquid]

antihumanism: "everything i don't like is judeo-bolshevism" predates and shaped 1942

Yup and the Dreyfus affair defining the term "intellectual" predates this shit too, tis a way in which Burnham's book was merely dressing up the long-held innate prejudices of the era as frequently happens.

[chicago-geniza]

Every time I return to my Tadek research I learn a new 1930s Polish euphemism for "Judeo-Bolshevism." He went to jail on charges of communism and Wacław Wiślicki, who was his brother-in-law, bailed him out for 50K zł. Unszlicht was also his cousin so people really played up the Soviet connection and accused him of conspiracy. He stopped editing WdW in 1931 (issue 7/8), presumably for the trial, was released from jail in 1932, and Stefania visits him in the USSR circa 1934, so I'm assuming he left between late 1932 and 1933

[jacensolodjo]

ID: picture of a list of the Jewish death toll broken down by country. The important information is Poland has a 2.93 million victim count while Ukraine tucked under the Soviet Union heading has 680,000.

Note: the text at the bottom left is for a different display.

Another shift working the Holocaust Museum another chance for me to take pictures to make a point.

Notice the death toll. I don't mean in total. I mean how many in each place. Poland is first. But look who is second. Ukraine.

680,000 Ukrainian Jews. And this is just official from the Holocaust. There are thousands more dead from pogroms and Soviet massacres.

Ukraine has been bled and bled again. Over and over. By both the Soviet Union and the Nazis. Whether for just the singular crime of being Ukrainian or for the double crime of Ukr and Jew. And make no mistake, there were literal plans in place by the Nazis for what to do with the Slavic peoples. Any and all Slavic peoples. It is why Operation Barbarossa went ahead. It is why Slavic folks were shot after they were used up. The best a Slavic person could hope for under nazi rule would have been slave. This is what the plans called for. Kill like 90% of the population and use the rest for slave labor.

So sure there were eastern European nazi collabs. But remember how many died. And how few actually collaborated once it became clear the nazis were not there to save people from communism despite their propaganda saying just that. (Also, people miss the fact that they called it Jew Bolshevism aka judeo-bolshevism. They blamed the Jews for communism which conflated jews with communism when in fact communism murdered a lot of Jews. And we see echoes of that now. Like. Y'all will literally sit there telling me anti communism is antisemitic. And not even seem to get you're regurgiating nazi propaganda but in diferent wrapping. There is nothing to be gained by equating jews with communism. I have met many jews who had family flee communism but i have not met a single jew that is vehemently pro communism. I'm not saying they don't exist, just that it is very rare. Because we all know exactly who communism harmed because in actuality communism could never play nice with Judaism. They do not mesh at all. We were all exposed to the 'russia/soviet union is a jewish utopia' thing but I promise that was incorrect. )

ID: pictures of multiple propaganda posters translated into Russian. Text on the top left says: Nazi propaganda posters meant to convince Europeans of the dangers of Jewish capitalist, communist, and masonic world conspiracy. End ID.

Related: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy lost family in the Holocaust (a couple of great uncles i believe). He isn't alone. You will find the same story many places. And still we have people claiming ukrs are all nazis and Russia has the right of it. As if it didn't bleed Ukrainian jews as well. As if it isn't doing so right now. On every Shabbat, on every holiday, Ukrainian Jews have bled and/or died.

Semi related: just because a few Jews have played Nazis on screen (Taika Waititi, half the cast of Hogan's Heroes, Charlie Chaplin, a bunch of other folks too I'm sure) it doesn't mean it is somehow possible for a nazi to be a jew for real. And vice versa. We see this brought up so often and it makes my brain hurt. Like seriously your best defense when we say Zelenskyy is a Ukrainian Jew is that he is a nazi anyway? It is completely illogical. A jew can be self hating, but it is simply not possible for them to be a nazi. They can collaborate with nazis but at the end of the day they are the only people you can give collab credit to rather than just 'people who help nazis are nazis'. It is impossible no matter how self hating. Along with that you had a lot of people in ghettos who tried to save who they could by 'befriending' nazis. Technically collab, but not quite malicious. But at the end of the day a Jewish nazi cannot exist.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, proud Ukrainian Jew, cannot be a Nazi. Neither can the Prime Minister, Denys Shmyhal, who is also *gasp* Jewish (Shmyhal is a slavic form of 'ishmael/shmael' in fact). Literally the main reason people were unsure about Zelenskyy at first is they were afraid if he fucked up, he would be the cause for antisemitic pogroms in retaliation. (which is not the same as saying there's a bunch of Nazis in Ukraine. You don't have to be a nazi to be antisemitic and to blame Jews for shit.) No matter how you look at it, every explanation for the invasion and war are bunk. This one just makes my head hurt especially bad.

[metamatar]

i find it really really interesting when people insist that WW2 allies were in general ideologically motivated to oppose fascism as an ideology. any attention you pay to the interwar period, the popularity of eugenics amongst intellectuals, the racist ideological apparatus of the jim crow south that inspired hitler, the anti-semitism invoked in opposition to the soviet union (judeo-bolshevism) – they make it obvious that the moral exhortation to "give no quarter to fascists" is a position that does not precede the nuremberg trials.

[oleworm]

Re: Elon Musk blaming the rift with his daughter on "Communism"

Reading about the 20th century and finding similarities with what is happening in the 21st century is like "They've been calling the conspiracy theory of Judeo-Bolshevism cultural marxism now because when they first tried to repopularise it a few years ago they were afraid to alienate regular people. It's frightening how the hatred and repression of minorities has been rebranded a matter of free speech among people that didn't use to think about them at all. They barely knew they existed. Every time I think I could be imagining this because most of the material I read is either about or set in the 19th and 20th centuries there's another absurd story in the news suggesting the repetition of these themes. Can't even invent a new horror. Not even surveillance is new. They've had this at least since the Inquisition."

[irithnova]

besides I have seen way too many people talking now about 'good and bad slavs' (including some slavic people themselves), also getting uncomfortable close to regurgitate '''''Judeo–Bolshevism''''' n-zi talking points. The kind of people that will call anything leftist or progressive ''commie''. People showing their true faces I assume.

(2/2)

Yeah :/ I'm not so informed on this matter but it is a slippery slope

[badlydrawnpictures]

“Trans ideology” is the new “Judeo-Bolshevism”

[selamat-linting]

the anarchists in my city are a joke. they have always been an isolated sausage fest but now theyre even more disappointing. one of them stood up at some lib fem event asking what are their target market for organizing the damn show. are you fucking kidding me? and now i just saw them distributing a zine online called 'the influence of jewish culture in punk scenes' and oh boy its goes as badly as you think it is. talking about hidden conspiracies and hidden agendas from too much nazi hate. this is what happens when you dont have a scientific theory to explain why things are the way they are. this is what happens when you dont learn about settler colonialism and imperialism properly! congrats assholes, you sound just like those right wing cunts who is afraid of judeo-bolshevism!