#Intimate partnership

[autuboho]

*a couple love each other platonically*

Straight society: that’s not love.

*two friends love each other romantically*

Society: that’s not friendship.

*person who loves their family member*

Society: mhmmm… that’s affection.

*person who loves an animal more than anything*

Society: this is platonic.

*person who loves his friend more than anything*

Society: this is platonic.

*a cat and a dog love each other*

Society: this is platonic.

*a person loves their child*

Society: that’s affection.

*a person who loves a creature*

Society: that’s affection.

*a person love their daughter*

Society: that’s affection.

*a couple loving each other romantically*

Society: this is love.

*a couple loving each other romantically give up to anybody even their dear friends and family go against anything to ensure their love for each other*

Society: okay this is TRUE LOVE.

[bookinit02]

why is everyone insisting that francesca loves john romantically when it is so clear that like. she loves him and appreciates him as a friend? and she was soooooo relieved to find one (1) man that she could stand being around and actually wanted to be partners with even though she didn’t feel anything for him romantically, so she latched on immediately and rushed the wedding so she wouldn’t have to worry about courting anymore.

i haven’t read the books and i have no idea what happens next (regardless of if they choose to follow the original plot or not), but as a lesbian who experienced severe comphet around francesca’s age, it was incredibly clear what she was going through. if they choose to make her bi, obviously that’s completely fine, but i’m just confused as to where it’s coming from?

[pynkhues]

https://x.com/starseahalo/status/1852136930130956551/photo/1

still love this

I literally think about it all the time, anon, haha.

[isilandiaa]

[thegreatyin]

Scientist and Scoundrel

they're not dating and they're literally married and also fucking the same (two different) guys (not literally but in my heart) and ALSO they can't wait to go to each other's funerals knowing they could've changed the outcome. im insane about them

[loudmound]

i feel bad for having romance in so many of my stories but i hope that they come across as different flavors of such bcs people will naturally go about that in different ways or not at all if it's not something they desire or are into. idk. i'm a hopeless romantic either way.

[anderwater]

the bear tag is so full and busy. really feel like i did my job for season one and now i can just rest and reblog.

[compressednerve]

quadrant of boys who will scream at you while you're having a panic attack (and they're all capable of having emo hair too)

[autuboho]

“What if society placed the idea of love and romance , “the one”, special someone, a significant other, a soulmate, your spiritual double, the beloved one was revolved on friend instead of a partner?”

[alexturner]

"if my... if mine..."

[orcelito]

I Love the way I cycle through games. Me opening up my switch to find animal crossing. I take it out, find the animal crossing case. Open it up, Oh no there's a game! But Wait. It's fire emblem, the game I was gonna be looking for anyways! All is well in the world.

[headspace-hotel]

im reading a lot of research about the mycorrhizal network because this is a HUGE emerging area of research and there is so much new stuff coming out its sooooo neat

So basically "the mycorrhizal network is how trees send each other nutrients and help each other" is wrong,

but the main reason people were mad at it—because they thought everything in the ecosystem is selfish and competitive acting for its own interests—is much wronger.

How come?

Well...fungi aren't just a postal service for trees. They have lives of their own! Plants aren't just controlling the mycorrhizal network to send nutrients where they want, they are communicating with the fungus and negotiating the terms of that relationship.

The genetic basis in plants for forming the mycorrhizal symbiosis is old. REALLY old. Like, "before plants even came onto land" OLD. Other forms of symbiosis, like what legumes have going on with the Rhizobia, are using the same genes to do their thing. There's a LOT of genes involved with creating the symbiosis, including some redundancies just to be safe, and we're only just now starting to understand them.

Why so many genes? What are all these genes for? Everything! Communication chemicals, hormones the other partner will respond to, flipping switches in the other partner's genes. There was a lot of arguing over which partner, the plant or the fungus, was "controlling" the partnership, but this question turned out to be total nonsense. Both symbionts have to recognize each other, respond to each other, prepare for symbiosis by adjusting how their genes are expressed, form the symbiosis, and continuously negotiate the relationship by exchanging chemical signals. Both can actively select the partner that offers the best benefits. There's even experiments where it's been shown that if the fungus turns parasitic, the plant will start secreting fungicidal chemicals. (But also the mutualist fungi in the experiment outcompeted the parasitic one when the pots were seeded with both.)

Mycorrhizal symbiosis is an incredibly intimate relationship. Like, the fungus produces special organs that literally grow inside the plant's cells, and the plant is actively participating in allowing this to happen. The plants and fungi have genes for hormones used by the other species, they have soooooo much stuff encoded in their DNA for interacting with their symbionts, it's like, blurring the lines for whether they're even separate organisms. There are SO many chemicals involved in communication between them and we only understand a few of those chemicals.

This is SO MUCH COOLER than if the plants were just using the fungus as a passive conduit to communicate with and support each other. The fungus is actively participating!

We were fools and assumed there had to be one partner that was "in control," but both plant AND fungus have to initiate and to some extent they're each engaging on their own terms! Or maybe it's better to think of them as one and the same organism?

We're also finding out that there's a lot more types of mycorrhizal symbiosis than we thought (at least five) and a lot more variety in how it works.

And that's not even getting into fungal endosymbionts—fungi that live inside plant cells completely instead of having part of them be outside and in the soil. They aren't considered mycorrhizae because they're fully inside the plant cells and not connected with any soil fungi network but they do a lot of complicated things we don't understand and interact with the plant's other symbionts.

Fungal endosymbionts produce a lot of chemicals that are useful to the plants in some way, and it turns out, that a lot of them kill cancer. Seriously, we've gotten a LOT of anti-cancer drugs from these guys. I think it's because they have to bypass the plant's immune system, but they also fight each other/other little guys that get inside plant cells, so they kind of...are part of the plant's immune system?

And what's MORE

Is that plants and fungus aren't the only things part of this system! There's also bacteria that are symbiotic with the plants and fungi! Even the endosymbiont fungi have bacteria that are endosymbionts inside THEM. Double endosymbiosis.

I think I read one paper saying the bacteria use the fungi to get around? Like that's how Rhizobia find their way to the legume roots in the first place? Have to double check that one

[splattermouth]

rando cute lil headcanon, but while hes defo aro, volo still likes sweet romance novels a lot. hes soft. he yearns. he will not tell a soul abt this fact.

[autuboho]

“Friendship can be romantic.”

[sxlifeapp]

Dive into Intimacy Conversations with Ease on SX.LIFE App! 🌟

Hey lovelies! 💑 Let's talk about that one topic that's often hushed, whispered, or awkwardly avoided – intimacy. 🙈 But guess what? The times are changing, and so is the way we approach these important conversations in our relationships! Enter, SX.LIFE app – your ultimate solution to discussing intimacy without those pesky taboos. 🔥

🌸 What's SX.LIFE, you ask? 🌸

SX.LIFE is not your typical app – it's a safe space where couples can explore, learn, and share their thoughts about intimacy openly and comfortably. No more dodging the topic or feeling embarrassed. This app is all about fostering a deeper connection between you and your partner by breaking down barriers and creating a platform for honest conversations.

💬 Features that Make SX.LIFE a Must-Try: 💬

• Receive thought-provoking daily questions tailored to your relationship, fostering continuous growth, exploration and transparency. • Send your own questions anonymously to your partner, allowing secret revelations and expressing your true needs. • Connect with multiple partners, if desired. Discrete and shameless.

🌟 Let's Start Talking, Shall We? 🌟

Ready to take your relationship to the next level? SX.LIFE is your go-to app for shedding those inhibitions and embarking on exciting intimacy conversations. Remember, open communication is the key to a thriving relationship, and SX.LIFE is here to guide you every step of the way.

Lear more:

Download SX.LIFE now and unlock a world of intimacy without the taboos. Let's talk, share, and grow together! 💞

Now available on App Store:

And Google Play: