hello, since you know a lot about linguistics (genuine compliment) i was wondering what your analysis of the phrase "[character] is so" (without any word after 'so') as so describe a character that is unusual/eccentric in a way the speaker likes. the adjective deletion feels weird. is there a plausible analysis based on "intentional abrupt end of speech" as a lexeme. please tell me there is.
I don't have a good analysis of this construction off the top of my head, although I can say that explaining it by positing an "abrupt end of sentence" lexeme is probably not the most parsimonious one. It looks to me like perhaps it's a headless adjective phrase, in the same way that something like "the blind" is a headless noun phrase.
17 notes
·
View notes
* using "accepted for publication" as the metric because I realise things sometimes take years to actually come out. in this case i mean peer-reviewed academic publications (but postgrad journals etc count, it doesn't have to be a fancy prestigious thing, i just mean as opposed to a 500-word column in your uni's newspaper or something)
i guess if you're in the kind of field where papers have many authors and you get to be in the list because you're a member of that lab, even if you didn't write the paper, that also counts? i don't really know how stem publications work tho. i am in a field where most articles are single author, sometimes two authors but rarely more
honestly this is just curiosity on my part. it's pretty limited data since i won't know what fields people are in (or if you sought publication sooner but it didn't work out) but i just wanna get a sense of what's typical
73 notes
·
View notes
HELP
ok this obviously isn't actually an emergency or anything but
i want to start a slow-burn modern!au multi-chapter fic, where reader and levi are forced to be roommates and transition from reluctant acquaintances to lovers uwu. i'm having reader be either a sophomore or junior in undergrad, but i'm stuck on what i want levi as! he'd be a few years older but i can't tell which of these three i'd want the most:
please vote and reblog! i'm really excited to get this series started
44 notes
·
View notes
Collaborative Writing: Tips for Co-Authoring Research Papers
Collaborative research is an integral part of academic work, and co-authoring research papers is a common practice in the scholarly community. By combining the expertise of multiple individuals, you can produce high-impact research. However, successful collaborative writing requires effective communication, coordination, and a shared commitment to the project. In this blog, we'll explore valuable tips to ensure the success of co-authoring research papers.
Define Roles and Responsibilities
Before embarking on a collaborative research paper, it's essential to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each co-author. This includes determining who will lead the project, who will conduct data analysis, and who will be responsible for writing and editing. A well-defined division of labor sets clear expectations from the outset.
Establish Clear Communication
Open and effective communication is at the heart of successful collaboration. Ensure that all co-authors are on the same page regarding the research objectives, timelines, and milestones. Regular meetings, both in-person and virtual, can help maintain transparent and ongoing communication.
Choose the Right Tools
In today's digital age, there are numerous collaborative tools available that facilitate co-authoring research papers. Consider using platforms like Google Docs, Dropbox Paper, or specialized reference management software (e.g., EndNote or Zotero) to streamline the writing and revision process.
Set a Timeline
Develop a timeline that outlines the key milestones, from data collection to manuscript submission. Having a clear schedule ensures that the project progresses smoothly and that all co-authors are aware of deadlines.
Respect Each Other's Expertise
Each co-author brings a unique set of skills and knowledge to the table. Respect and acknowledge the expertise of your collaborators. This mutual respect can enhance the quality and depth of the research.
Collaboratively Plan the Structure
Work together to plan the structure of your research paper. Decide on the order of sections, headings, and subheadings. This planning stage can help maintain a consistent and coherent narrative.
Establish Authorship Order
Determine the authorship order, keeping in mind the conventions of your field and the contributions of each co-author. It's essential that authorship reflects individual contributions rather than seniority.
Data Sharing and Management
Ensure that all co-authors have access to the necessary data and research materials. Establish data management and sharing protocols to maintain transparency and accountability.
Review and Revise Collectively
Collaboratively review and revise the manuscript. Encourage co-authors to provide constructive feedback and be open to making revisions. This iterative process is key to improving the quality of the paper.
Address Disagreements Constructively
Conflicts and disagreements may arise during the collaborative process. Address these issues constructively, ideally through open discussions and compromise. It's necessary to assert a positive functioning relationship.
Proofreading and Editing
Consider professional proofreading and editing to ensure the paper's language, grammar, and style are of the highest quality.
Plan for Authorship Agreements
Before submission, create a clear authorship agreement that outlines the roles, author order, and expectations for all co-authors. This consent can serve as a extract point in case of debate or disagreements.
Acknowledge and Cite Contributions
Properly acknowledge and cite the contributions of each co-author in the paper. Ensure that all individuals who contributed significantly are appropriately recognized.
Collaborative writing can be a rewarding experience, leading to the creation of impactful research. However, it requires commitment, communication, and a shared vision. By following these tips, you can navigate the challenges of co-authoring research papers and produce high-quality work that advances knowledge in your field.
5 notes
·
View notes