#Idaho Insurance Lawyers

[lawyersinfo]

Idaho Insurance Claims Lawyers - Complete Guide

Navigating the complex world of insurance claims in Idaho can be challenging. Whether you are dealing with a denied claim, underpaid settlement, or facing delays from the insurance company, having a proficient Idaho insurance claims lawyer on your side can make a significant difference. Our team of seasoned professionals is dedicated to helping you understand your rights and ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.

Understanding Insurance Claims in Idaho

Insurance claims can arise from various scenarios, including property damage, personal injury, health insurance disputes, and more. Each type of claim requires a specific approach, and our attorneys are well-versed in handling all kinds of insurance disputes.

Property Damage Claims

Property damage claims often involve damage to homes, vehicles, and other personal property. In Idaho, common causes of property damage include natural disasters like floods, earthquakes, and wildfires, as well as accidents and vandalism. Our lawyers meticulously analyze your insurance policy to determine the coverage and work tirelessly to ensure that you are fairly compensated for your losses.

Personal Injury Claims

Personal injury claims can arise from accidents such as car crashes, slip and falls, or workplace incidents. These claims often involve significant medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional distress. Our team has extensive experience in negotiating with insurance companies to secure maximum compensation for your injuries.

Health Insurance Disputes

Health insurance disputes can be particularly frustrating, especially when you are dealing with a health crisis. Whether it’s a denied claim for a necessary medical procedure or disputes over the coverage of treatments, our attorneys are skilled in navigating the complexities of health insurance policies and advocating for your rights.

The Role of an Idaho Insurance Claims Lawyer

An experienced Idaho insurance claims lawyer plays a crucial role in the claims process. From filing the initial claim to negotiating settlements and, if necessary, representing you in court, our attorneys are committed to ensuring that you receive the compensation you are entitled to. Here are some key functions our lawyers perform:

Evaluating Your Claim

Our lawyers start by thoroughly reviewing your insurance policy and the details of your claim. This evaluation helps us understand the extent of your coverage and identify any potential challenges.

Negotiating with Insurance Companies

Insurance companies often aim to minimize payouts. Our lawyers are skilled negotiators who work to ensure that you receive a fair settlement. We leverage our knowledge of Idaho insurance laws and our experience in handling similar cases to advocate effectively on your behalf.

Litigation Support

If negotiations do not lead to a satisfactory settlement, our attorneys are prepared to take your case to court. We provide robust legal representation, presenting compelling evidence and arguments to support your claim.

Why Choose Us?

Choosing the right insurance claims lawyer in Idaho can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Here are some reasons why our firm stands out:

Expertise and Experience

Our team comprises highly experienced lawyers who specialize in insurance claims. We have a deep understanding of Idaho’s insurance laws and a proven track record of successful outcomes for our clients.

Client-Centered Approach

We prioritize our clients’ needs and work diligently to provide personalized legal services. From the moment you contact us, we are dedicated to addressing your concerns and keeping you informed throughout the claims process.

Comprehensive Legal Support

We offer comprehensive legal support, from the initial consultation to the resolution of your claim. Our attorneys are accessible and responsive, ensuring that you always have the guidance and support you need.

Common Challenges in Insurance Claims

Dealing with insurance claims can present various challenges. Understanding these challenges can help you better navigate the process with the support of your lawyer.

Denied Claims

Insurance companies may deny claims for various reasons, including alleged policy violations or insufficient evidence. Our attorneys meticulously review denial letters and gather additional evidence to appeal the decision effectively.

Underpaid Claims

In some cases, the insurance company may offer a settlement that is significantly lower than the actual value of your claim. We use our expertise to challenge these lowball offers and negotiate for a fair amount.

Delays in Processing

Delays in processing insurance claims can be frustrating and financially straining. Our lawyers expedite the process by maintaining consistent communication with the insurance company and advocating for prompt resolution.

Steps to Take When Filing an Insurance Claim

Filing an insurance claim involves several critical steps. Here’s a guide to help you through the process:

1. Review Your Policy

Before filing a claim, review your insurance policy to understand your coverage and the specific terms and conditions. This step is crucial in determining whether your claim is valid.

2. Document the Damage or Injury

Gather all necessary documentation, including photographs, medical records, and receipts. Detailed documentation supports your claim and provides evidence of the damage or injury.

3. File the Claim Promptly

Timeliness is essential when filing an insurance claim. Ensure that you submit your claim as soon as possible, adhering to any deadlines outlined in your policy.

4. Cooperate with the Insurance Adjuster

An insurance adjuster will likely inspect the damage or investigate the incident. Cooperate fully and provide any requested information to facilitate the process.

5. Consult with an Attorney

Consulting with an experienced insurance claims lawyer can significantly improve your chances of a successful outcome. Our attorneys provide expert guidance and represent your interests throughout the claims process.

Conclusion

Navigating the intricacies of insurance claims in Idaho requires expertise and a dedicated approach. Our team of experienced insurance claims lawyers is committed to providing you with the support and representation you need to secure the compensation you deserve. We understand the challenges involved and are here to help you every step of the way.

[iamanartichoke]

I skimmed the notes to see if anyone else pointed this out, but I didn't see it, so I'm just going to take this opportunity to point out that, yes, while it is absolutely ridiculous to frame the murder of a single CEO as an act of terrorism, we should be aware that it isn't being used simply to be extra (for lack of a better term). It's more nefarious than just trying to control the cultural narrative around this crime and this case; one of Luigi's charges is "murder as an act of terrorism," meaning that he's being legally charged as a terrorist.

And while I have not done a deep dive / research into this entire issue (but I will if anyone's interested, tbh) insofar as how terrorism plays a role, what I can say based on my very, very vague awareness of the finer complexities of The Law, terrorists (alleged or otherwise) usually aren't given the right of due process. When someone is charged with terrorism, their right to a jury trial can be suspended and, instead, they will have some kind of military hearing (or tribunal) and guilt / sentencing will be determined by whoever presides over said hearing. Someone charged with plain old murder has constitutional rights that guarantee (in theory) the right to a speedy trial, the right to a jury trial, and the right to a fair trial. The trial also has to be made public, whether that's by streaming or simply accessible transcripts (or a combination; see - every trial that's made the headlines in the recent years, from Depp to Murdaugh to Brooks [the latter who, by the way, was charged with driving his SUV into a holiday parade and killing / injuring something like 60 people yet was not, to my knowledge, charged with terrorism {I watched that trial but I don't remember the details so feel free to fact-check me}]). Someone charged with terrorism has no such constitutional rights.

And, again, I'm just going off the cuff based on what I personally am cognizant of; I don't have sources to cite and I don't know the ins-and-outs of how it all works. It's also worth mentioning that terrorists (alleged or otherwise) who go through these types of hearings are generally not US citizens - but, this is how the government was able to send prisoners to Guantanamo Bay.

So my point is, Eric Adams is using deliberate language to uphold the narrative that Luigi's actions are that of a terrorist and in doing so he's complicit in whatever groundwork the feds may be laying behind the scenes in order to manipulate the legal system and loophole their way out of a public jury trial. The powers that be are already aware that the general public sentiment favors Luigi and thus finding an impartial jury will be difficult; god forbid a jury acquits him - they may feel like the risk of acquittal is too high and so they're making moves to eliminate that risk.

Anyway, idk, I just wanted to toss that out there bc I feel like this needs to be called out. Most of the comments I skimmed mentioned "innocent until proven guilty," and I'm just saying, from where I'm sitting, I don't think we can take it for granted that Luigi is innocent until proven guilty, nor can we take it for granted that he will have a fair trial. Our criminal justice system is complex, in a word, and corrupt people who have power can and do use it as a weapon. That's what's happening here, and it's dangerous.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Jessica Valenti at Abortion, Every Day:

I was all set to publish a normal daily report today when I came across two bits of news: Idaho Republicans are back in federal court fighting for the right to deny women life-saving abortions, and South Carolina lawmakers have reintroduced legislation to make abortion punishable by the death penalty. Considering this comes at the same time that politicians are disbanding or tampering with maternal mortality committees in order to cover up the fact that their bans kill women, it seemed like the right moment to take a step back and acknowledge how absolutely fucking crazy this is.

They’re killing us, and we’re meant to behave as if it’s business as usual.

Anti-abortion politicians and activists have demonstrated again and again that they believe women’s lives are expendable—worthless, really, if not for our reproductive ability. Yet we’re expected to sit here and react to that violence as if it’s simply politics. As if it’s perfectly fine that our suffering and deaths are being debated in statehouses and courtrooms as if we’re not human beings, but thought exercises and legal arguments. That’s the hardest thing about doing this work. As difficult as it is to comb through the onslaught of awful abortion rights news every day, the real horror is the normalization. Because truly, how is it possible that there isn’t one single headline or news article about the South Carolina bill that could punish abortion patients with the death penalty? Is that how little our lives rate? It’s not as if reporters didn’t know the legislation was coming; Republicans have introduced this bill before. In fact, last year two dozen lawmakers co-sponsored the ‘Equal Protection Act’—a bill that doesn’t only classify abortion as a homicide, but defines personhood as beginning at fertilization.

That means conservatives who believe emergency contraception and IUDs stop the implantation of a fertilized egg could argue that these common forms of birth control are actually abortions. In other words, birth control could be punishable by the death penalty. Still, not a peep from mainstream media outlets. As if such legislation should just be expected. Similarly, the legal fight over emergency abortions only warranted three headlines today, from CNN, the Associated Press and Newsweek. We’re talking about a case that could determine whether states can legally deny women life-saving abortions in hospital emergency rooms. That’s a front-page story—an issue that deserves coverage in every publication across the country. Instead, we got a few obligatory paragraphs in a handful of outlets.

For those who need a reminder, this case revolves around the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)—a federal law that requires hospitals to provide life-saving emergency care, including abortions. In 2022, the Biden administration sued Idaho, arguing that the state’s abortion ban prevents doctors from following EMTALA. By the time the suit reached the Supreme Court, we heard about doctors having to airlift women out of Idaho for emergency care, and a medical system so broken that OBGYNs were advising pregnant patients to get extra life insurance. Still, Idaho Republicans defended the law and pooh-poohed concerns about patients’ lives. At one point American women were put in the surreal position of watching the nation’s highest court debate just how many organs are acceptable for them to lose before the state should be required to provide an abortion. In the end, the Supreme Court didn’t issue a ruling on the merits but kicked the case back to a lower court. That’s where it is now, with the Ninth Circuit—where we’ll have to listen to lawyers debate our lives like bullet points all over again.

[...] We need to say it constantly and consistently, online and off: This is as bad as it seems. They are as unhinged and cruel as they seem. And no amount of calling themselves ‘pro-life’—or trying to normalize this horror—will ever hide the truth. They’re killing us, and we won’t let America forget it.

Jessica Valenti wrote this solid piece in her Abortion, Every Day blog about how abortion bans kill women and how unhinged the anti-abortion movement is.

[self-loving-vampire]

Dhillon, known for her staunch opposition to LGBTQ+ rights, has represented Chloe Cole, a prominent anti-trans detransitioner who has called puberty blockers a “gateway drug” and testified in favor of numerous state-level trans bans. Cole’s lawsuit against Kaiser Permanente is just one example of Dhillon’s alignment with far-right anti-trans movement. With the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division at her disposal, Dhillon’s appointment signals an alarming shift that could make life increasingly difficult for transgender people nationwide, including those who have sought refuge in blue states to escape anti-trans legislation. Harmeet Dhillon's most prominent work includes founding the Center for American Liberty, a legal organization that focuses heavily on anti-transgender cases in blue states. The organization's "featured cases" section highlights several lawsuits, such as Chloe Cole's case against Kaiser Permanente; a lawsuit challenging a Colorado school's use of a transgender student's preferred name; a case against a California school district seeking to implement policies that would forcibly out transgender students; and a lawsuit against Vermont for denying a foster care license to a family unwilling to comply with nondiscrimination policies regarding transgender youth. With Dhillon's potential new role at the Department of Justice, these cases may gain renewed significance, as she is given the ability to leverage the department's power against states that protect their transgender residents. The attorney herself has openly advocated for overturning blue-state laws that protect transgender individuals. For instance, in response to Maine’s designation as a refuge for trans people fleeing anti-trans crackdowns in red states, Dhillon claimed such a law would be unconstitutional. Safe-state laws like Maine’s have grown increasingly common, explicitly preventing care provided within the state from being subpoenaed by out-of-state actors seeking to prosecute individuals under laws that do not apply in blue states. These laws safeguard residents from interstate legal attacks over actions such as traveling to access gender-affirming care, abortions, or other reproductive healthcare. As of December, 17 states have enacted “shield laws” designed to protect their transgender residents from these efforts to eliminate access to care, even in jurisdictions where bans do not exist. Such laws have taken on heightened importance this year as officials like Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton attempt to access medical records of transgender individuals across state lines. Paxton issued subpoenas to healthcare providers in states as far away as Georgia and Washington, seeking information on transgender patients from Texas who received gender-affirming care. In Washington, a robust shield law effectively blocked his out-of-state legal efforts. Dhillon has repeatedly expressed extreme anti-transgender views on social media, often engaging with and praising the Libs of TikTok account—an account whose posts frequently precede bomb threats targeting schools and hospitals. In one such post, Dhillon commented on a school in Idaho respecting a transgender student, stating, “We are talking IDAHO, folks. Not coastal California. I’m telling you this predatory gender madness is everywhere!” In another post, she responded to Glenn Beck by calling gender transition a lie, writing, “Make it unsafe for American doctors to destroy young American lives through the lie of sex change aka ‘gender transition.’ Expand the statutes of limitation. Make insurance paying for these procedures also pay for detransition. Make it stop.” In that interview, Dhillon doubled down, declaring that hospitals providing gender-affirming care must be “made unsafe” to do so.

[transhoming-project]

Save Trans Lives

The "TransHoming Project" aims to build Tiny Home communities and RV Parks for Minorities fleeing red states. These homes could either serve as temporary lodging or permanent residence.

These communities would be established in sanctuary states such as:

New Jersey

New York

Oregon

Illinois

California

Any other state that is safe for LGBTQ+ individuals, Women, Children, and People Of Color.

The end goal is to have large-scale communities with little-to-no cost for the inhabitants, and a self-sustaining model for water, food, and electricity.

If the United States will not protect us, we will make our own sanctuary.

Why is this project needed?

As of April 7th, 2023, there have been over 450 anti-LGBTQ+ bills proposed in the United States. These bills range anywhere from Banning transgender healthcare for youth (Idaho HB 71) and prohibiting Health Insurance from covering ANY Gender affirming care (Florida HB 1421), to Charging anyone who uses the “incorrect” bathroom with sexual assault (Arkansas SB 270).

To find more information, visit the ACLU’s website.

With these bills in the works, the safety of LGBTQ+ persons, their health providers, and their children are at risk. It is imperative that we start relocating to blue sanctuary states before these bills become law.

With our project, we will ensure that those who cannot afford to quickly relocate on their own can seek proper shelter through us.

How can I help?

Share Our Cause!

Spread the message to your friends and family! The more visibility this project gets, the faster it will succeed!

Subscribe to our social medias:

Youtube

Instagram

Discord

Tiktok

LinkTree

Help Financially

Each sale on our website goes into funding the project, or you can donate directly to the cause by subscribing to our website.

Updates On funding will be posted weekly on our social media.

Offer a Skill/Service

We are in need of:

(Illinois Residents Only)

Realtors

Construction Workers

Architects

Electricians

(Remote)

Artists

Advertisers (with prior successful results)

Lawyers

If you have any of the skills listed above, contact us! We are willing to pay for expertise.

[idahofallslawyer]

Top-Reviewed Idaho Falls Law Firm: Expert Legal Support for Insurance Disputes

Tackling the complexities of insurance disputes demands the skill of an expert attorney. Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC, a prominent law firm in Idaho Falls, excels in this challenging domain. If you require an insurance dispute lawyer in Idaho Falls, Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC is the firm to rely on. Their proficient team of attorneys is committed to achieving optimal outcomes for their clients' insurance claims.

Insurance conflicts can arise from a variety of reasons, including denied claims, undervalued damages, or postponed payments. These issues can be exasperating and stressful, especially when you're already handling the aftermath of an accident, injury, or loss. The attorneys at Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC grasp the intricacies of insurance policies and the tactics used by insurers to minimize payouts. They leverage their vast knowledge and experience to vigorously advocate for their clients' rights.

One notable strength of Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC is their tailored approach to each case. They dedicate the time to thoroughly examine the specifics of your situation, ensuring they understand every element of your claim. This meticulous attention to detail enables them to build a compelling case and effectively negotiate with insurance companies on your behalf. Whether you're dealing with a car accident, property damage, or health insurance claim, their team is well-equipped to handle your case with the utmost professionalism and care.

In addition to their expertise in insurance disputes, Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC offers a wide array of legal services, making them a comprehensive resource for individuals and businesses in Idaho Falls. Their commitment to excellence and client satisfaction has earned them a stellar reputation in the community.

Choosing Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC as your insurance dispute lawyer in Idaho Falls means opting for a firm dedicated to securing the best possible outcome for your case. Their seasoned attorneys are ready to guide you through the legal process, providing the support and representation you need during a challenging time. For expert legal support in insurance disputes, trust the team at Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC to deliver exceptional results. For further information about an insurance dispute lawyer in Idaho Falls, check out www.thwlaw.com. 

[jjlawidaho]

Personal injury lawyer in Boise and Nampa Can Help

A personal injury lawyer can help you understand Idaho laws Personal injury lawyer in Boise and Nampa can help you enjoy maximum compensation. Personal injury law in Idaho, like in many other states, deals with cases where individuals have suffered harm due to the negligence or wrongful actions of others. These cases can encompass a wide range of situations, including car accidents, slip and falls, and more. To effectively navigate these cases, a personal injury lawyer must develop a comprehensive legal strategy that encompasses various key elements.

Initial Consultation and Evaluation

The legal process typically begins with an initial consultation between the attorney and the potential client. In this meeting, the attorney will evaluate the client's case to determine its viability. This evaluation often includes a discussion of the details of the incident, the injuries sustained, and any evidence available. In Idaho, it's important to assess the case's merits based on the state's laws, which may differ from other jurisdictions.

Investigation and Gathering Evidence

Once a personal injury lawyer takes on a case, they embark on an investigative phase. This involves collecting and preserving evidence that will be crucial in proving the client's claims in court. This can include gathering medical records, accident reports, witness statements, and any other relevant documentation. Idaho's laws related to evidence and procedure must be closely followed to ensure the admissibility of this information in court.

Negotiation and Settlement

In many personal injury cases, a settlement can be reached without going to court. Negotiation is a key component of a personal injury lawyer's strategy. They will often engage with the opposing party or their insurance company to seek a fair settlement on behalf of their client. Idaho has specific rules and regulations governing settlement negotiations, and your attorney will ensure that any agreements reached comply with state laws.

Litigation and Court Representation

If a settlement cannot be reached, the case will proceed to litigation. This is where a personal injury lawyer must put their courtroom skills to work. In Idaho, the court process can be complex, and your attorney will guide you through each step. They will present your case before a judge and jury, ensuring that all legal procedures are followed.

Working with Both Parties

Personal injury lawyers are ethically bound to act in the best interests of their clients. However, they must also adhere to professional standards of conduct, which often involve working with the opposing party in a civil and respectful manner. In Idaho, as in other states, lawyers are expected to engage in good faith negotiations and maintain professionalism during court proceedings.

Understanding Idaho Laws

In Idaho, specific laws and regulations can impact personal injury cases. For example, Idaho follows a "modified comparative negligence" rule, which means that if the injured party is found to be partially at fault for the accident, their compensation may be reduced proportionally. A skilled personal injury attorney will have a deep understanding of Idaho's legal landscape and how to navigate it effectively.

The Importance of Legal Strategy in Personal Injury Cases

The success of a personal injury case often hinges on the strength and effectiveness of the legal strategy employed. Here are some key considerations that demonstrate the importance of a well-thought-out approach:

Maximizing Compensation: A sound legal strategy aims to secure the maximum compensation possible for the injured party. In personal injury cases, damages can include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more. Idaho law may place caps on certain damages, and a skilled attorney will know how to navigate these limitations while still pursuing the best outcome for the client.

Establishing Liability: Proving liability is a fundamental aspect of personal injury cases. Your attorney will work to establish that the defendant's negligence or wrongful actions directly caused your injuries. This may involve expert witnesses, accident reconstruction, and careful examination of the facts. Idaho's laws related to negligence and liability will play a significant role in this process.

Mitigating Comparative Negligence: Idaho's modified comparative negligence rule means that if you share some fault for the accident, your compensation may be reduced. An attorney will strategically argue for a reduced level of comparative negligence on your part, which can significantly impact the final settlement or court judgment.

Trial Preparedness: While many personal injury cases settle out of court, a lawyer should always be prepared for litigation. This includes understanding the rules of evidence, expert testimony, and courtroom procedures in Idaho. An attorney's preparedness and ability to present a compelling case can make a significant difference in the outcome of a trial.

Timely Filing and Compliance: Personal injury cases have strict deadlines for filing lawsuits, and adherence to these deadlines is crucial. An experienced attorney will ensure that all necessary documents are filed correctly and within the specified timeframes. Non-compliance with these requirements can result in a case being dismissed.

Alternative Dispute Resolution: In some cases, alternative dispute resolution methods, such as mediation or arbitration, may be utilized. A personal injury attorney will strategically participate in these processes to achieve the best possible outcome for their client while keeping Idaho's laws and regulations in mind.

Client Advocacy: Throughout the legal process, a personal injury attorney is the client's advocate. They will provide guidance, support, and clear communication at every stage of the case. This includes explaining the implications of legal strategies and potential outcomes in a way that the client can understand.

Navigating a personal injury case in Idaho requires a comprehensive legal strategy tailored to the specific circumstances of the client's situation. An experienced personal injury lawyer understands the intricacies of Idaho's laws, court procedures, and the nuances of negotiations. They will work diligently to build a solid case, advocate for their client's rights, and, ultimately, seek the best possible outcome, whether through settlement or court proceedings.

If you've been injured in an accident in Idaho, it's essential to consult with a qualified personal injury attorney who can provide guidance and representation tailored to the unique legal landscape of the state. They will craft a legal strategy aimed at securing the compensation and justice you deserve.

Hire the best personal injury lawyer in Boise and Nampa ID Jacobson & Jacobson Law Firm, since 1982, is committed to serving the Boise and Nampa, Idaho areas for your top Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, Business Law, Estate Planning, Family Law, Immigration Law, and Litigation needs. Contact us today to get started. For a free 30-minute consultation, book here: https://calendly.com/jfj-1

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Jessica Valenti at Abortion, Every Day:

I know, I know—I don’t want to think about it either. But if the worst happens, we need to be prepared. So let’s talk about what would happen to abortion rights if Donald Trump wins the presidency.  Despite Trump trying to appear moderate on abortion rights over the last few months, conservatives’ plan for reproductive rights should he win is about as extreme as it gets—from the Comstock Act and reversing approval of abortion medication to appointing two new Supreme Court justices.  To start, let’s be clear that if Trump had the votes, he would absolutely sign a national abortion ban. Despite the disgraced former president’s promises to veto a ban, Republicans simply wouldn’t call it that. Instead, they’d say that they’re passing a ‘minimum national standard’ on abortion. Because remember, the only thing that they consider an abortion ban these days is total prohibition—no exceptions, even to save a woman’s life. They’d push for something like the 15-week abortion ban Sen. Lindsay Graham has been proposing and insist it’s merely a restriction. 

Then there’s abortion medication, which is a primary target for conservatives, who know that many patients in anti-choice states have been obtaining the pills via telehealth and mail. To stop that from happening, Trump would replace the head of the FDA in order to repeal approval of abortion medication or seriously restrict it. (Three Republican Attorneys General have already brought a lawsuit to try to rollback access to the drug.)  Trump would also replace the head of the Department of Justice, who would in turn start to enforce the Comstock Act. This 150-year old obscenity law doesn’t just ban the mailing of abortion medication, but of any tools used in abortion; it could also prohibit the shipping of birth control that Republicans claim aren’t contraception, but abortions. Since 63% of abortions are done using abortion medication, these attacks on the pills would amount to a national backdoor ban impacting the entire country, not just anti-abortion states.

A Trump administration could also make it easier for states to deny women emergency, life-saving abortions. Conservatives have already been attacking the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), with Republican state leaders arguing that the federal law doesn’t trump their abortion bans and that EMTALA doesn’t require emergency abortions at all. With Trump at the helm of the federal government, that bogus interpretation of the law could become standard. What’s more, a Trump administration could decline to enforce EMTALA, allowing states with extreme abortion bans to deny women life-saving care. (States like Idaho and Texas are already fighting for that right in the courts.)

Some of the names being thrown around for DOJ appointments should send a chill down your spine. Abortion, Every Day sources tell us that Erin Hawley—the high-profile anti-abortion lawyer from Alliance Defending Freedom, involved in the Dobbs case, the mifepristone lawsuit, and EMTALA cases before the Supreme Court—is on a shortlist. Also being considered is Jonathan Mitchell, the anti-abortion lawyer behind Texas’ “bounty hunter” law and the “Sanctuary City of the Unborn” travel ban ordinances. These are the worst of the worst when it comes to abortion rights—giving them the reins of any federal agency (or even access to it!) would be a full nightmare.  Then there’s Project 2025. In addition to all of the attacks listed above, this conservative roadmap for forcing women back into the home calls for expanded ‘conscience laws’ to allow doctors, pharmacists, insurance companies, and employers to refuse to dispense or cover not just abortion—but birth control.

The plan also details how a Trump administration would gut Title X funding for contraception and use the program to focus on “fertility awareness and holistic family planning,” and to “provide educational information on healthy marriage and relationships.” In other words, they’d advocate for the rhythm method and push women into marriage. How would they do that? By directing that funding to anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers—religious groups that oppose birth control.  The last thing Project 2025 would direct a Trump administration to do is collect massive amounts of data on abortion, support bad science and attack patient privacy—from laws forcing doctors to ask women invasive questions and report their answers to the state to the fabrication of abortion ‘complication’ data. In other words, a pregnancy surveillance system.

A Trump 2nd term would be a giant disaster for abortion access and reproductive health more broadly.

Vote Harris to protect abortion, birth control, IVF, and contraception.

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

June 29, 2021

Heather Cox Richardson

Last week, Florida governor Ron DeSantis became the latest Republican governor to sign a bill making it harder for citizens to shift away from the fossil fuels that are changing the climate. The move came after Miami, which is in danger as sea levels rise, proposed cutting carbon emissions by banning natural gas infrastructure in new buildings. The bill was written by lawyers for utility companies, based on a pattern written by the American Gas Association. Lobbyists for the Florida Petroleum Association, the Florida Natural Gas Association and the Florida Retail Federation, the Florida Home Builders Association, and the National Utility Contractors Association of Florida supported the bill.

Nine other Republican states have already passed similar legislation.

Republican-led states are defending the use of fossil fuels in other ways. News that President Biden’s climate envoy, John Kerry, was urging major U.S. banks to invest responsibly with an eye to the climate crisis, led the state treasurers of West Virginia, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and South Dakota to write to him expressing their “deep concern” that he, along with other members of the Biden administration, was pressuring banks “to refuse to lend to or invest in coal, oil, and natural gas companies, as a part of a misguided strategy to eliminate the fossil fuel industry in our country.” They accused the Biden administration of “picking economic winners and losers” according to “Biden’s own radical political preferences,” and thus depriving “the people” of agency.

Coal, oil, and natural gas are crucial to their states’ economies, they said, providing “jobs, health insurance, critical tax revenue, and quality of life.” They warned that they would withhold public funds from any banks that refused to lend to fossil fuel industries.

And yet, historically, the government has picked fossil fuels as a winner that outranks any other energy source. While Republicans tend to claim any spending for alternative energies is wasteful, a recent report by the Stockholm Environment Institute, a nonprofit think tank, says that U.S. subsidies to new oil and gas projects inflate their value by up to $20 billion per year. This would seem to fly in the face of Republican complaints about “socialism” in which the government picks winners and losers.

A recent Morning Consult poll shows that 50% of voters say climate change is a critical threat to America. Another 26% think it is important, but not critical. Among Democrats, 75% think climate change is crucial, while another 17% say it is important. Among Republicans, 21% say that climate change is crucial, while another 37% say it is important, but not crucial.

With this support for addressing climate change, why do Republicans appear to be dead set against dealing with it in a meaningful way and instead are propping up the fossil fuels that feed that change?

At the nomination hearing for now–Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland, who has promised to protect our lands, Senator John Barrasso (R-WY), the top Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, told Haaland that his state collects more than a billion dollars a year in royalties and taxes from the oil, gas, and coal produced on federal lands in the state, and warned that the Biden administration is “taking a sledgehammer to Western states’ economies.”

Oil produces the most revenue for Texas, which earned $16.3 billion from oil in 2019, an amount that made up 7% of the state’s revenue. Oil revenues accounted for 70% of state revenues ($1.1 billion) in Alaska in 2019, 52% of state revenues ($2.2 billion) in Wyoming in 2017, and 45% of the revenues ($1.6 billion) in North Dakota in 2017.

But production declines in the past year due to the coronavirus pandemic have hurt these fossil fuel states. Wyoming expects to have 29% less money than it expected in 2021–2022. Alaska expects an estimated 18% budget deficit in fiscal 2021. Without money coming in from fossil fuels, people will have to make up the difference by paying taxes, an unpopular outcome, especially in Republican-dominated states, or by losing even more services.

Reducing dependence on fossil fuels will also cost current jobs, and one of the hallmarks of an economy developed around an extractive industry is that it tends to have little flexibility. The rural American West was developed around extractive economies, with a few wealthy men employing lots of workers, and its limited economy means that workers cannot transition easily into other fields.

Fossil fuel advocates also contribute mightily to Republican campaigns, adding financial interest to party members’ general dislike of regulation. In Florida, utility companies employ an average of one lobbyist for every two legislators. “It’s no secret we play an active role in public policy,” a spokesman for a Florida utility told Rolling Stone’s Tim Dickinson in 2016.

This week, in the Pacific Northwest, temperatures in Portland, Oregon, reached 115°F; Seattle hit 108°. Canada hit its highest temperature on record: 116°F in British Columbia. Roads are buckling and power cables melting. In the New York Times today, climate scientist Michael Mann and climate communicator Susan Joy Hassol warned that the conditions of our earth will only get worse unless we do something. But, they wrote, “A rapid transition to clean energy can stabilize the climate, improve our health, provide good-paying jobs, grow the economy and ensure our children’s future.”

—-

Notes:

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/919/BillText/er/PDF

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article249783273.html

https://www.npga.org/news-resources/florida-enacts-law-protecting-propane-and-natural-gas/

https://www.wfla.com/news/florida/local-florida-governments-cant-restrict-dirty-energy-usage-under-new-law-signed-by-desantis/

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/20788734-state-treasurers-letter-to-john-kerry-on-fossil-fuel-lending-w-signatures

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/12/kerry-to-wall-street-put-your-money-behind-your-climate-pr-475565

https://newrepublic.com/article/162842/tax-breaks-fossil-fuel-companies-inflated-profits-oil-gas-drilling

https://morningconsult.com/2021/04/27/paris-agreement-climate-change-threat-poll/

https://trib.com/business/energy/rules-to-keep-coal-fired-power-plants-burning-in-wyoming-are-expected-soon/article_f6feb1f0-21c6-54b6-8de9-91cb98615263.html

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/feb/07/massive-losses-should-be-a-warning-to-big-oil-that-its-bonanza-is-over

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-koch-brothers-dirty-war-on-solar-power-193325/

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/29/opinion/heat-dome-climate-change.html

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

[idahofallslawyer]

Safeguarding Your Concerns: Why You Need an Insurance Dispute Lawyer in Idaho

In the realm of insurance, conflicts can unexpectedly surface and disrupt the lives of policyholders. Whether it's a declined claim, postponed reimbursement, or undervalued settlement, managing Idaho insurance disputes can be a complex and exasperating process. This is where the seasoned team at Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC intervenes, dedicated to shielding the interests of those grappling with disputes related to insurance.

The Intricacies of Insurance Disputes

Insurance policies, while designed to provide financial security during challenging times, can be a maze of complexities and legal terminology. When disagreements emerge between policyholders and insurance providers, it's often the latter that holds the upper hand in terms of resources, expertise, and legal acumen. This power imbalance can leave individuals and businesses feeling powerless and at a disadvantage.

Leveling the Playing Field

Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC acknowledges the importance of evening the odds in Idaho insurance disputes. Their team of adept lawyers specializes in addressing a wide range of issues related to insurance, from homeowners and auto insurance claims to life and health insurance conflicts. They understand the unique obstacles that policyholders face when dealing with insurance companies, and they have a history of achieving favorable outcomes for their clients.

Navigating the Claims Process

One of the most common challenges in insurance disputes is the denial of a valid claim. It's frustrating to have faithfully paid premiums, only to find that your insurer is hesitant to honor its commitment when you need it the most. Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC's insurance dispute lawyers are well-versed in the tactics insurers employ to minimize payouts. They can evaluate your claim, advocate on your behalf, and negotiate with the insurance provider to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.

Protecting Your Investments

Insurance policies constitute legal contracts, and policyholders have rights under the law. Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC's lawyers are experts in insurance law, and they are committed to safeguarding your entitlements throughout the dispute resolution process. They can interpret the fine print of your policy, ensuring that the insurer adheres to its obligations, and take legal action if necessary to secure a just resolution.

Don’t Stress

Engaging an insurance dispute lawyer from Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC not only provides you with legal expertise but also peace of mind during a stressful period. Knowing that you have a knowledgeable advocate by your side can alleviate the burden of dealing with insurance providers and allow you to focus on recovery and rebuilding your life.

In conclusion, when facing Idaho insurance disputes, enlisting the services of an experienced attorney can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC is dedicated to safeguarding your interests, ensuring that you are treated fairly by insurance providers, and securing the compensation you rightly deserve. Don't navigate the complex world of insurance disputes alone—let Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC be your trusted legal partner. For further information about Idaho insurance disputes, check out www.thwlaw.com.

[privateinvestigator41-blog]

Obtaining the most effective Personal Investigator for your personal Condition

private detective Columbia SC

After you have to have the companies of the personal investigator, how will you notify the primary difference in between the great along with the terrible candidates? You should not squander your time and efforts and cash by just blindly selecting any person who might not be equipped to accomplish the task. By subsequent these recommendations, you can locate the greatest non-public investigator on your scenario, regardless of the want may perhaps be.

CEO Formula

one: Get a referral.

Check with somebody you recognize and trust, your attorney, a buddy or perhaps a co-worker, if they have ever hired a personal investigator, and what their working experience was like. When they experienced a fantastic encounter you continue to ought to look at them out. When they had a nasty encounter now you realize who never to employ.

two: Verify together with the Greater Business Bureau.

Do a look for on the BBB internet site or simply call your local BBB office environment. Seek out candidates that have BBB Accredited Organization. Even when a private Investigator would not have an Accredited Company they may have got a ranking which should really enable you to determine if it is anyone you need to take into account.

3: Do a web Lookup

When you have identified some attainable candidates, do world-wide-web queries utilizing the name with the corporation as well as names of the principals.

In case you now possess the name from the principals, do an online search utilizing their names. Set quotes close to their name, run the look for, and browse any articles that come up. Chances are you'll find equally destructive and constructive details.

Should you nevertheless you should not have any superior candidates, otherwise you are searhing for some extra choices, do an internet search using the text "Private Investigator", "Private Detective", "Private Investigative Agency" or "Private Detective Agency" along with the city by which you need the providers, or a minimum of the closest main city.

Look into the web-sites from the non-public investigators that appear up.

4: Phone Job interview

Contact the candidates and ensure you include all of the issues listed down below.

five: Initial consultation

Build an first session with all your best prospect and identify if they are the best non-public investigator with the career.

For the duration of every phase from the course of action, hold these questions in mind:

Initial effect?

Do they present on their own skillfully on their web page, on the telephone and in individual? How properly do they impart? They need to arrive throughout as specialist, articulate and credible to some others in dealing with your situation, these as witnesses, your lawyer, a decide or maybe a jury. The results of the case is at stake.

Where by and who?

Are they actually in or close to the geographic location you'll need companies? Who is going to do the do the job?

Several "national companies" will market just as if they might offer services any place. Basically the things they frequently do is subcontract the do the job out to an individual during the spot. Why exploration a personal investigator's background if they are just planning to go your scenario on to another person?

Expertise?

Have they got expertise during the variety of circumstance you will be seeking their services for?

The ideal non-public investigator can recover, extra cost-effective success. Regardless of whether their rates are increased, you obtain whatever you pay for.

Be suspicious of people giving providers with unusually low selling prices or no retainer. They might not be competent for your career, or they could possess a historical past of bad cases.

Proprietors?

Realizing who owns the Personal Detective Company will let you research their status.

You are searching for an individual with ethics, integrity along with a great small business standing. Once more, the results within your case is at stake.

Licensed?

Some states, like Idaho, have no point out wide licensing prerequisites, but several of the towns or counties could. A neighboring state in all probability does have licensing for personal non-public investigators and personal investigative agencies. Even though your point out will not need a license, check if your candidates have got a experienced license.

A license typically implies they've got much more means at their disposal in comparison to the non certified non-public investigator. In addition, it commonly usually means they may have a thoroughly clean legal report.

So what occurs in case you employ the service of an unlicensed non-public investigator each time a license is necessary? Any proof they get hold of might not be admissible in court. This could bring on

squandered funds unusable information a damaged circumstance along with a attainable lawsuit

Try to remember, you need ethics, integrity and professionalism.

Skills?

What qualifies them to do what you want them to do?

It's not at all unconventional in the slightest degree for someone to start up a private investigative company and also have no far more knowledge and practical experience than what they have obtained from a Tv set demonstrate

So check with them to inform you with regards to their skills which include instruction, professional affiliations, certifications, and practical experience.

Coverage?

Have they got liability and professional auto insurance plan?

If a non-public investigator you've got retained does anything in your case that effects inside of a regulation match you also may very well be sued. This might consist of committing some type of crime, a battery, an assault, a trespass, or he could have a targeted visitors incident when on your case.

Expenses?

Investigators' service fees differ, dependent upon what you wish performed and their expertise. For most investigations it is tricky to know particularly the amount it is going to price, so will not be surprised to get presented an believed variety. Devoid of a crystal ball you always do not know precisely what is destined to be needed to achieve the objectives of a provided investigation. I endeavor to stop working an investigation into phases, and reach an knowledge with the shopper on how whatever you will seek to do in the 1st section and how considerably it can expense. Never be amazed if a retainer is required. Just keep in mind you usually get everything you pay out for.

Guarantees or Ensures?

Be suspicious of a personal investigator that ensures effects. When they make promises they likely can not keep, hunt for someone else. As in just about anything else, if it appears far too great to get legitimate, it possibly is.

Do they recognize?

Do they comprehend what you would like them to try and do?

Give the private investigator a brief description of what you want to obtain carried out. Make observe of whether or not they actually hear you, or are they a lot more centered to the dollars. After you have spelled out your condition, the best personal investigator will offer you distinctive solutions determined by your targets.

From in this article they must get the job done along with you to find one of the most inexpensive solution.

If after the meeting with your very first applicant and also you don't feel at ease with them put in place a meeting with the next decision and the like. If the out appear of one's case may be very critical and it has really serious outcomes never soar to swift choice. There is typically only one opportunity to do an investigation and it should be accomplished proper.

By undertaking your investigation and inquiring the ideal questions, you ought to locate the finest investigator for your personal distinct situation. Although you should pay back the next price for your proper man or woman, keep in mind, you usually get whatever you pay out for.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Florida DMV makes millions selling Floridians' data...for pennies (and you can't opt out)

Axciom buys records from Florida's DMV (which include non-driver IDs) at $0.01/each.

They're just one of many, many data-brokers who buy data from the state's DMV. So many, in fact, that the state turned over $77m in data-sales in 2017.

These get sold for bill collection and insurance purposes, and are not supposed to be used for marketing, but these are data brokers and so they sell the data on, and then the data gets sold again, and again.

We know that at least some of that data gets abused, turned into fodder for repeated robocalls and direct-mail solicitations, because of Sonia Arvin's experience with her developmentally disabled sister, who moved to Florida from Idaho to live with her. Sonia took her sister to get a non-driver ID so she could apply for Medicaid, and shortly thereafter, was inundated with direct mail, robocalls, and salespeople ringing their doorbells. Sonia's sister can't read or write and is not registered in any other databases, apart from Florida's DMV.

A lawyer who represents data-brokers told WFTS that buying public data is the cheapest way to acquire it.

https://boingboing.net/2019/07/14/axciom-florida.html

[idahofallslawyer]

Exploring Health Care Regulations in Idaho: Your Trusted Allies at Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC

When considering the intricate and constantly evolving realm of Idaho health care law, having a committed legal team by your side can create a significant impact. Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC proudly stands as a pillar of expertise and counsel for individuals, establishments, and entities seeking clarity and resolution within the intricate sphere of health care regulations.

With years of experience in the field, Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC comprehends the distinct challenges that clients encounter in the healthcare sector. From health care providers and institutions to insurance firms and medical practitioners, their seasoned lawyers possess a profound understanding of the legal complexities that govern Idaho health care law.

One of the essential factors that sets apart Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC is their unwavering commitment to staying updated with the latest developments in Idaho health care law. This commitment ensures that their clients receive accurate and current guidance, allowing them to navigate the ever-shifting landscape confidently. The firm's attorneys are not only well-versed in the existing statutes and regulations but are also skilled at anticipating potential changes and adjusting strategies accordingly.

Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC adopts a collaborative approach to each case, working closely with clients to tailor effective legal solutions that align with their specific needs and objectives. Whether it involves advising on compliance matters, assisting with regulatory challenges, or providing representation in disputes, the firm's attorneys are dedicated to safeguarding the best interests of their clients.

As evidence of their reputation, Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC has garnered praise for their professionalism, dedication, and successful track record in handling Idaho health care law cases. Their comprehensive approach not only addresses the immediate legal concerns but also focuses on preventing future issues, thereby fostering sustained success for their clients.

In the intricate realm of Idaho health care law, having the right legal partner can provide the necessary foundation for thriving within a complex environment. Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC is poised to be that partner, offering a blend of expertise, dedication, and strategic insight to guide clients through every legal challenge they may face in the dynamic field of health care.

For all your Idaho health care law needs, Thomsen Holman Wheiler PLLC is here to provide the guidance and representation you can rely on. Contact them today to learn more about how their experienced team can assist you in navigating the complexities of health care law in Idaho. For further information about Idaho health care law, check out www.thwlaw.com. 

[mercuryismygenius]

Book Review: ‘Dreamland’

Dreamland: The True Tale of America’s Opiate Epidemic by Sam Quinones

In Dreamland, Sam Quinones tackles the current opioid crisis in the United States with impressive thoroughness. His goal in researching the epidemic was The Big Picture---unfortunately, such comprehensiveness may not be possible. Nonetheless, he does an admirable job, making Dreamland one of the few should-reads for contemporary America.

There is a lot in this book. Broadly speaking, the material can be divided into two basic categories: the legal, and the illegal (specifically represented by Oxycontin, and Black Tar heroin, respectively). Broadly speaking.

On the legal side, Quinones interviews doctors, researchers, nurses, clinicians, patients-cum-addicts, Oxycontin dealers, and families of the lost; he has chapters on the poppy plant, opium, and morphine; he discusses Arthur Sackler and the rise of pharmaceutical marketing, which included the wooing of doctors; and he traces the history of pain treatment---the medical treatment of pain being one of the largest enablers of the opium epidemic.

It’s hard to call what occurred in the medical establishment an overt conspiracy since, outside Big Pharma, most intention was good. Most. 

It began because opium derivatives are pain killers---and the pain-killing properties of opium are ancient news. Also well-known was the fact that opioids are addictive, and use was restricted and monitored. Cancer changed that, with doctors advocating the use of morphine, etc. for end-stage cancer patients who were dying in horrible pain. At that point, it was a quality-of-life issue, and the campaign was successful.

Unfortunately, around the same time that pharmaceutical companies were honing their marketing skills, and developing opium-derivatives, medicine decided to extend the quality-of-life logic to all forms of pain. Injured? Opioid. Chronic back pain because you don’t lift with your legs? Opioid. Whatever the pharmaceutical company had, that was the solution.

And as for that habit-forming problem of opium-derivatives? Turns out, according to an infamous “study” referred to as Porter and Jick, opioids aren’t really that addictive after all. That Porter and Jick was really just a letter to the editor noting one pattern in a limited pool of data either didn’t matter, or, more probably, was never known by the people who cited it (a couple of whom Quinones interviews). Yes, bad science became a major contributor to our opioid crisis. No one checked the “study” that was repeated ad nauseam, and few paid attention to the data at hand concerning the high rates of addiction in patients who were prescribed Oxycontin.

Insurance companies didn’t help matters. They’d pay for prescription medication, but not for physical therapy, psychotherapy, nutritionists, or holistic/ multidisciplinary approaches to pain treatment. So doctors who wanted to use those non-pill approaches were put out of business.

But that’s just the legal opioids. On the illegal side, Quinones focuses on Black Tar Heroin, a viscous, dark-colored substance that’s as pure as heroin can get. He interviews cops, dealers, DEA agents, addicts, lawyers, and community organizers. And because he follows the Black Tar, he discusses Xaliso, a city in the state of Narayit in Mexico, where the heroin was grown.

Black Tar heroin dealers changed the game. Just about everything about them confounded police. The dealers didn’t carry guns, didn’t fight turf wars, and feared local gangs. They didn’t use, and they didn’t adulterate their product by cutting it---they didn’t need to as there was no multilevel distribution line. They delivered to their customers, carrying a minimum of heroin, so if caught, D.A.s rarely felt they were worth the time, and they were just deported.

Deportation was not a deterrent. The Xalisco Boys, as Quinones calls them, dealt heroin in order to make money and be the Big Man struttin’ around town back home. In the United States, their lives were spartan---the point was to go back home to their sugarcane-farming town, having struck it rich. Unfortunately, the dealers spent too lavishly, didn’t invest or save, so money ran out, and they had to return to the U.S.

The system the Xalisco Boys had was capitalism at its finest. No corporate headquarters, no cartel bigwigs, just small entrepreneurs competing in an open market. They had excellent customer service. Not only did they deliver like pizza, they offered samples, and deals. Addicts would get extra heroin for introducing a new customer. The Xalisco Boys would pay (in heroin) for an addict to hand out samples at the local methadone clinic. They’d exchange drugs for your name on an apartment or car lease. And when word got back to Narayit of ripe territory, a gold-rush mentality set in, and more cells would show up in town to compete for the same customers. Prices dropped.

Besides being non-violent in general, in Xalisco, the culture included webs of long-standing family feuds that few wanted to challenge. Because if anything untoward happened in the U.S., it *would* get back to Mexico.

Thus the more adventurous dealers would strike out for new territory. If an addict happened to know of another possibly-lucrative town, they’d introduce the Boys. 

One dealer Quinones interviews, called The Man, was actually born in the U.S., and entered the Xalisco system from the outside. Of Mexican descent, he spoke English and Spanish, and recognized the relevance of Oxycontin to heroin sales (most of the Xalisco Boys didn’t bother learning more than functional English, so didn’t see the bonanza). He was arrested before he could really pave the way, but others did so after him.

Part One of the book ends with the arrest of numerous dealers in multiple states in one of the largest, most coordinated operations in drug-enforcement history. But the insidiousness of the Xalisco system is that it’s self-renewing. Arrest one guy, someone else will take his place. As long as there’s demand.

As I stated above, there is a lot in this book. Quinones manages this plethora of information by “braiding” or “juggling” it: he tells the story of the family of a young man who od’d; introduces a dealer called Enrique; moves to Dr. Herschel Jick wondering about rates of narcotic addiction in patients at his hospital; reveals how Dr. David Proctor came to Portsmouth, OH (he wasn’t able to interview Proctor in person); Enrique again; a cop in Denver; the morphine molecule; Proctor; Enrique; a cop in Idaho; Xalisco culture---this is not the actual order he goes in, but it is the gist of his technique. He touches base with each thread, showing how they interweave. It’s an interesting approach that I think works well for the material, but it did get difficult sometimes to remember who was who. I’d use the index in those cases.

Two limits before I end this already long review. First, the heroin angle is limited to the Black Tar out of Xalisco. Other heroin dealers, gangs, cartels, etc. are mentioned only when relevant to Black Tar and the Xalisco system. So, for example, the Xalisco Boys avoided New York City like the plague, so not much about the presence of heroin there in Dreamland.

Second, racism is prevalent throughout, but not explicitly explored (this is a limit, not a detraction). The Xalisco Boys would not deal to blacks if they could help it---mostly out of fear derived from prejudice. But the far more subtle forms of racism, especially in the predominantly white middle-American towns exist like smog---it’s there, it’s not good, but those immersed in it stopped noticing. Quinones points it out a couple of times, but the degree to which it’s relevant is up to the reader (since his topic isn't the various connections between racism and drugs, he may have decided to just let instances of racism stink up the background and not turn Dreamland into a doorstop).

Highly recommend this book.

[verybearspray-blog]

Still No Grizzly Hunt While Judge Decides Fate Of Yellowstone Bears

A government judge has broadened a transitory prohibition on mountain bear chasing close to Yellowstone National Park while he thought about the creature's destiny.

ListenListening...1:12Click 'play' to hear the sound form of this story.

In 2017 the national government expelled Endangered Species Act insurances for Yellowstone-zone grizzlies. Before long, Idaho and Wyoming chose to enable individuals to chase them.

Be that as it may, ecological gatherings and clans sued over the delisting. A government judge is taking as much time as is needed settling on a choice and simply expanded the chasing boycott for an additional two weeks.

Matthew Bishop is a lawyer for the offended parties. He says this is a decent sign.

"The additional time the court spends taking a gander at the lawful issues and the best accessible science I think the better risks my customers need to win for the situation," Bishop says.

Wyoming natural life official Rebekah Fitzgerald trusts the species isn't re-recorded. She says her state has a solid grizzly protection plan, "... for the bear populaces in general, however that additionally considers a moderate chasing season."

Before the chasing boycott produced results, Wyoming and Idaho affirmed around two dozen bears to be slaughtered outside Yellowstone's limits.

This story was created by the Mountain West News Bureau, a cooperation between Wyoming Public Media, Boise State Public Radio in Idaho, Yellowstone Public Radio in Montana, KUER in Salt Lake City and KRCC and KUNC in Colorado. If you are looking for more information about oil lamp fuel alternatives.

[ltmlawyers-blog]

Things You Keep In Mind When Hiring Personal Injury Attorney

When an individual has actually experienced an injury due to the carelessness of one more party it is a great decision to speak with an attorney who concentrates on personal injury. Accident lawyers are available to aid their customers that have actually been harmed as an outcome of carelessness of an additional individual or organization.

These insurance claims often include automobile crashes, slip as well as drops, medical malpractice, work environment injuries, and attack. They can likewise be filed when a consumer item is defective as well as triggers physical injury. In a personal injury case, a person can seek financial problems based upon the degree of the injury, whether it be physical, psychological or both. Injury insurance claims additionally cover other things such as loss of incomes or loss of job because of the injury.

Not every attorney focuses on family law attorney Boise Idaho. It is necessary to locate a lawyer that concentrates on not only accident lawsuits however a particular injury as well. Throughout litigation, the insurance companies will certainly have their very own legal representatives who are totally experienced in relation to personal injury laws. Therefore it is just as important for the customer or hurt celebration to have a lawyer that is equally as experienced. Experienced attorneys who focus on a certain injury will certainly have the ability to utilize this knowledge and their resources to deal with the law suit.

These lawyers will have access to medical specialists that will help strengthen the situation. They need to also have access to legal situations that are similar to your own. Getting ready for an accident case takes some time. You will require an attorney who is furnished to soothe the concern of waiting by filing the appropriate movements, gathering statements from witnesses, as well as manage the discovery process.

For all the various kinds of these injury situations, there are specific Boise personal injury lawyer to manage them. Medical malpractice law is an excellent example. This kind of regulation is incredibly complicated and very specialized. Consequently, it is necessary to discover an attorney that concentrates on a certain injury. Spine Injury and Mind Injury are very intricate areas which would certainly require a lawyer that just focuses on these types of injuries.

You will certainly not be able to win an injury legal action without a qualified as well as experienced attorney. Injury attorneys are there to supply the competence and understanding about the legislation that a routine person does not have. They will certainly guarantee that you are dealt with fairly as well as your case is filed appropriately. Working with a lawyer that specializes in your specific injury will certainly reduce the problems of planning for a suit to make sure that you can recover from your injury.

For More Info :-    lawyer boise id