#I wants the animation

[13-nothing]

Ok, so I've been on a Marvel kick recently (I mean who hasn't with the Deadpool and Wolverine movie having come out) and ya know what I really want?

I want a Marvel's Law animated tv show that's basically where Howard the Duck, Jennifer Walters, and Matt Murdock rotate per episode to represent or (in Howard's case) investigate all of our fav characters in some kinda court trial where it's just a TON of crossovers and team ups.

Have it where they have one *guest* (Oooo, aaaah) character per episode, and then have those eps split into two parts where one part is the court side where its like that time when Spidey tried to sue the Bugle for defamation, and then the 2nd part is some fun kick butt action with the *guest* (Oooo, aaaah) and one of our law people fighting the mafia or something, while keeping the whole thing fairly light hearted, but including a few curse words, blood, and such if the character in question calls for it.

I would have most of the eps of seasons 1, 2, & 3 be like above where they are mostly unconnected, with a few extremely vague hints sprinkled throughout that give clues towards something that happens to these characters in the comics that they will give insight to where it's going. But then on the last ep of the 3rd season reveal that all of the heroes r having a HUGE civil war with every single Marvel character (well all the ones that make sense at least meaning no Guardians of the Galaxy or like IDK Alpha Flight really doesn't work either).

Then having the 4th and final season just basically following a Civil War Arc cause 🚨🚨 NEWSFLASH 🚨🚨 not all Superhero Civil Wars JUST include the Avengers (unlike how all of the tv show and movie iterations have shown thus far) (Unless they did that in the continuation of 'Avengers Assemble'? But I don't think they included the Fantastic Four or the Xmen in that SOOO ya my statement still stands).

BUUUUUUT that's just a little random Marvel idea I had cause y not? Also I kinda would just like an actually intertwined Marvel universe for once where everyone's stories overlap and have the crossovers that they were meant to have. (I mean it's kinda like that for the 90's shows and the 2010s shows but even then they r holding back from what it could be. Like I want ALL the Spidey crossovers in their full animated glory, *dramatic sigh* but alas I am left to read comics and the shows I have until the end of time.)

Thanks for reading and I say farewell to thee my fellow existences!

[climbingthefloors]

obsessed with this baby hippo from thailand's khao khew zoo.. she has been so utterly betrayed by the world

[dovesick]

endless night

[canisalbus]

✦ Fashionably late ✦

[seagiri]

when did this happen???

[druid-for-hire]

[image id: a four-page comic. it is titled "immortality” after the poem by clare harner (more popularly known as “do not stand at my grave and weep”). the first page shows paleontologists digging up fossils at a dig. it reads, “do not stand at my grave and weep. i am not there. i do not sleep.” page two features several prehistoric creatures living in the wild. not featured but notable, each have modern descendants: horses, cetaceans, horsetail plants, and crocodilians. it reads, “i am a thousand winds that blow. i am the diamond glints on snow. i am the sunlight on ripened grain. i am the gentle autumn rain.” the third page shows archaeopteryx in the treetops and the skies, then a modern museum-goer reading the placard on a fossil display. it reads, “when you awaken in the morning’s hush, i am the swift uplifting rush, of quiet birds in circled flight. i am the soft stars that shine at night. do not stand at my grave and cry.” the fourth page shows a chicken in a field. it reads, “i am not there. i did not die” / end id]

a comic i made in about 15 hours for my school’s comic anthology. the theme was “evolution”

[bug-s0da]

blehhh...

i made an aa/lawyersona of @snapscube :3 we all know and love the lawyer+silly girl duos of ace attorney but it's about time the silly girl became the lawyer

[chaos-smoothie]

we did it once we can do it again we did it once we can do it again WE DID IT ONCE-

[jollymalt]

i am manifesting a meet-up

[pangur-and-grim]

in other news, my friends got mad at me and said that I was melting the whole server with my chicken farm, but it's not my fault they're filthy casuals

[nooling]

LOOK I JUST REALLY ENJOY THEIR FRIENDSHIP OK?? You can't tell me they wouldn't hang after their respective personal quests (spawn ending ofc)/emotional breakdowns over their own mortality

EDIT: I forgot to watermark these so now more than ever PLEASE don't repost

[eydilily]

gem n joel the strongest duo (family) that you are

and of course. her

[doctorsiren]

OBJECTION! - Ace Attorney, but in Legos that I 3D modeled myself

[slitherbop]

VIVIAN

[kianamaiart]

Some out of context, unused takes from our recording session with Anairis Quiñones, who is voicing Aika in the pilot!

Can't wait for y'all to hear more than just this one line. And also what this one line is for in context haha.

[why-animals-do-the-thing]

hi! can i ask what's ur opinion on giving pets away? not necessarily because u can't afford to care for em anymore but maybe incompatibility of personalities or maybe lifestyles. is it wrong to give ur pet for adoption if u know someone who's better suited for keeping a pet, like emotionally?

This is going to be controversial, but I support making that choice.

There’s a lot of rhetoric lately around how it’s evil and unethical to rehome your pet if you don’t “need to.” And what that does is prioritize human ideology over the actual animal’s well-being.

Pets that aren’t a good match for your home or pets that aren’t really wanted anymore frequently have lower welfare! When caring for an animal becomes a burden or is forced, people end up resenting them, and that means the animal often doesn’t get all of its needs fulfilled. Even if you’re still feeding it and providing appropriate vet care, how likely are you to provide affection or enrichment to an animal you’re tired of being stuck with?

Lifestyle and personality really matter to making sure a pet is a good fit for a home. A dog that alert-barks at every leaf that moves is probably a bad fit for someone who has a chronic migraine syndrome, and they might not know that until the dog has been in the home for weeks and started to open up. A really feisty kitten that requires a ton of play might not do best in the home of someone older who wanted a quiet lap cat. And while you can you do your best to plan to find a compatible animal, you won’t always know ahead of time what issues might arise.

“Forever home” rhetoric is really, really popular and I think it’s very unfair to the animals it is supposed to support. It started with the backlash of seeing animals abandoned inappropriately, and has been heavily reinforced in the public mind because it’s so frequently used to drive fundraising and support for legislation. The whole “forever home” concept communicates to people that getting an animal is an immutable commitment and that if you can’t keep an animal, it is a personal moral failing. It frames human priorities (we think people who get rid of animals are Evil and Bad and should be shunned) as more important than actual welfare needs for individual animals (are they getting the care they need where they are).

Obviously, I don’t support people dumping animals or just getting fad pets they’ll discard immediately, but there’s so many alternate situations that can arise. Even if it’s just “they got a pet and didn’t know what caring for it would take and didn’t want to care for it so they brought it back, how awful” like… okay, I’d like the person to have done more research before they got a pet, but isn’t it better that the animal now has a second chance to go to better home? Knowing what a commitment requires theoretically can be very different than having to actually follow through regularly, and I’d rather see someone maturely acknowledge that having an animal isn’t a good fit than keep it anyway!!

If animals being happy and with all their biological, veterinary, and social needs fulfilled is actually the goal, we need to prioritize their welfare over human opinion. I’d much rather see an animal rehomed responsibly to somewhere it will thrive and be welcomed than see people keep animals they can’t/don’t want to care for out of guilt or shame.