#I don't necessarily think it was the intent
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
So to answer... SOME of this... Remote-unlock services are available from a variety of vendors including Onstar and so on. It's moderately common these days.
I'm only familiar with Onstar so I'll talk about that -- short version is your account at Onstar (accessible from your phone) has a button that can send an unlock request to the vehicle, which allows your phone to act like a keyfob if you've locked your keys inside. There are other keyfob-like functions you can control remotely as well, like setting off or stopping the alarm and activating remote-start. At police request, somebody at the service center can look up your account and unlock the vehicle remotely without a command from your phone.
The commands available are essentially only what the key can do, so they can't (for example) shut the car off while you're driving or whatever.
To be clear, I'm not at all comfortable with unknown persons in unknown locations having authority to control certain functions of my car, but it's not a Tesla thing, it's a modern-car-industry thing.
I would imagine the "locked by an explosion" thing is not an intentional behavior; I wouldn't be surprised if a sudden pressure wave could jolt microswitches directly to cause things to happen as if you'd pushed a button. And a fire could cause the electronics to do some unintended stuff via short circuits as the wiring insulation melts off.
I assume charging stations often have security cameras built in, for many of the same reasons gas stations do (theft, vandalism, etc) as part of the ongoing surveillance culture we're living in.
I'm not a Tesla defender at all -- but I don't necessarily think this is a yikes, or at least not a Tesla-specific yikes.
Hey how come the truck automatically locks when it explodes and bursts into flames
71K notes
·
View notes
Note
I agree with all of this, "hope this helps" 🤣🤣. It would not be cheating at all and even if it was cheating I still wouldn't care 😅. Where do you sit on this topic?
Q. Let me start by saying I desperately want Buddie together but I have a growing suspicion that they're going to insinuate or outright show that they kissed at the bachelor party and that would taint them from go for me because putting them together through cheating, especially on a character the show established had turned into a really good guy, is so unnecessary and disgusting and ruins them right off the bat.
A. I wasn't going to reply to this ask but I have several similar asks currently sitting in my inbox so I'm going to respond even though this person is clearly a tommy trying to pretend to be a Buddie. How are you all still so bad at all of this nearly a year on? Your ask is a completely disingenuous take. If having them kiss at the bachelor party ruins them from the start for you then you don't 'desperately' want them together. You don't want them together at all and I don't know why you feel the need to pretend that you do. When the bachelor party takes place Buck and Tommy had been on ONE very bad date. Yes, they had a conversation where Buck said he wanted to try again but they were not a couple. You can't cheat on someone you've had one date with. Furthermore the show definitely didn't establish that Tommy had become some stand up remarkable human being, that is laughable. He was a sexist racist when they needed him the first time around for Chim and Hen, and he was a gay man the second time around when they needed someone for the coming out storyline. That's it. The show didn't care to establish anything else about him. The fact he left Buck standing on a curb after he understandably panicked a bit during their first date and then told Buck Abby went crazy when he dumped her pretty much illustrates though that he wasn't a great guy.
Forcing real life moral codes onto fictional characters is always a recipe for pain though. You can't do that. The very nature of the media they exist in doesn't allow for real life moral rules to always be followed. Real life people don't always do the right thing. Expecting fictional character to do so is ridiculous. Drama comes from their mistakes so television shows will always have them screw up and make bad decisions every now and again. I don't want them to have kissed at the bachelor party because I don't want their first kiss to be a flashback, but I won't be terribly bothered if that is the route they take because it's not that big of a leap to make. They made a point of making both of them drunk, Oliver mentioned in an interview while talking about filming the karaoke scene that everyone needs a little liquid courage now and then. They made a point of releasing the deleted scene with Eddie telling Chris about how he met Shannon and what he liked so much about her when they first met. The show then intentionally had the bachelor party mirror that story with Buck talking all night long and showing how close and intertwined they both were all night long. The karaoke song even fit the callback of that story from Eddie. We also cannot ignore the fact that Eddie basically blew up his life following the bachelor party so going back and showing that something did indeed happen between the two of them that night would not be some astronomical story leap. I have said from the beginning they filmed way too much content and spent way too much money for those scenes to just never come up again or be shown. I don't think we're getting the actual karaoke scene but I do think we might get some of the other scenes in a flashback of some kind but we don't know that for sure. That New Year's Day post was definitely an intentional choice and it was certainly an interesting choice, but it doesn't necessarily indicate anything bachelor party related is coming. It could just be one more thing to add to the growing belief that Buddie is very much coming though.
Lastly, even if Buck and tommy had been in a full blown years long relationship and the show had Buck and Eddie get together by cheating on him I still wouldn't care or be angry. They could murder him, chop him up and dispose of the body and I would call it the most romantic thing ever. I genuinely don't care about him at all. Hope this helps ☺️
Thank you Nonny! 🤗
As for where I stand on this topic?
Listen, I grew up on soap operas where everyone cheated on everyone.😋 It never bothered me. In fact, it brought some extra tension and I love that in a show. So I don't really care one way or the other.
But also, Tommy wasn't his boyfriend at that time. They were trying things out and so far Tommy had proven himself to be a bit of an ass. So no, if we find out that Buck and Eddie kissed or made out during that bachelor's party? I will cheer.🙌🙌🙌
I've been here since te beginning. They need to get this show on the road and if this is the way they have chosen to go? I'm fine with it.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
IMPORTANT! Please don't repost this ask and/or a link that leads straight to my Tumblr account on Twitter or any other social media. Thank you!
Heads up! For anyone who is giving me the shifty eyes for reposting Ali's updates instead of reblogging. Read this.
Remember, no hate in comments, reblogs or inboxes. Let's keep it civil and respectful. Thank you.
If you are interested in more of Ali’s posts, you can find all of her posts so far under the tag: anonymous blog I love.
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
yknow what. I wanna say: CSA and COCSA survivors are all incredible, but I also wanna give a shout out to ppl who were exposed to sexual stuff or had any kind of sexual experience as a kid that they either aren't comfortable labelling as or don't consider abuse, but they know it still fucking sucked and shouldnt have happened. Even if that changes later in life and you identify as a victim/surivor, it can be messy to have to imagine those labels applying to the ppl in ur life and that can take time.
The most important thing is to prioritize your recovery + health, and to support other victims + survivors.
#COCSA ment#CSA ment#This is like. V personal and venting (maybe over sharing)#It's. I'm going to be honest recent discussion really brought this back into my brain aaughhh. Not in a bad way necessarily#Just. I know I've had experiences that I think others might label this way and I struggle to really understand that#Beyond the gut feeling of ''it doesnt count'' there's the understand that I might be denying it bc of shame or even just. The fact I have#An internal definition of it that excludes myself. And that I don't want to imagine the other ppl as 'abusive' and I don't think they had#The intent to hurt me. And the fact in one situation I know none of us understood boundaries or consent bc we didn't#Actually talk with adults about what like. Sex and sexuality meant so all out fucking context was porn. And just idk#I have specific experiences but those Memorable Incidents were just part of a larger pattern of me learning Abt sex young#And then failing to get proper sex ed for years. And the internet. And the Fucking Internet#(fanfic is like. Anti sex ed. 70% just the fucking worst shit to internalize 30% ''hey this is actually Okay'')#Sex Ed... Like in school... Needs a fucking HEAVY overhaul but it's still better than nothing usually
285 notes
·
View notes
Text
in MDZS the novel, the innkeeper in Yunping mentions that people are too scared to go petition Yunmeng Jiang for help because someone once walked in on Sect Leader Jiang whipping a guy in the main hall, supposedly because the guy was a demonic cultivator.
#mdzs#jiang cheng#wei wuxian#jc apologism#anyways as you can hopefully tell by now this is a jc stan blog.#so as a stan i will do my rightful stan duty and insist that my fave did nothing wrong#so. onwards. the “jiang cheng tortures demonic cultivators” claim is interesting on several levels#because we don't see it happen onscreen. and because thematically mdzs is a book about the unreliability of rumors#especially when said rumors conform to your preexisting understanding of someone. or what you want to hear about someone#it would have been so easy for mxtx to include a scene where jc tortures a demonic cultivator onscreen. i would love to read it too#but that doesnt happen. when jc actually corners wwx he just shoves a dog in his face and bullies him emotionally#smh jc get your shit together!! what is this lame ass display?? not living up to your reputation here loser#anyways. tbh i consider two things separately: 1. mxtx's intentions. and 2. what the text itself implies#for 1. i am legitimately unsure of what to think. mxtx relies on rumors/empathy/etc to give us info about side characters#in part because she's constrained herself to writing from wwx's perspective and has no other easy way of getting the info to us#does she intend for us to question the rumors? or are we supposed to take them as fact because of the narration limits described?#2. what the text itself implies is not necessarily the same as what mxtx intends.#for me mdzs is in part a story about the unreliability of rumors and reputation etc etc. other meta writers than i have explained it better#so for the work to go “all the rumors about wwx were exaggerated/manipulated/not 100% correct.”#“but the rumors about everyone else are 100% true!!!!!”#is peak stupidity. and shit-tier writing#and i actually like mdzs so i would like to believe the writer is more intelligent than that#thus. i conclude in part due to this emotional necessity of mine that there must have been something more going on#anyways. i have similar opinions about the “did jiggy kill rusong” business but that's a post for later#ill probably put my jc torture opinions in their own post some day#yanyan polls
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'll shut up abt jenova one day, but the idea that hojo is so proud of himself for having created sephiroth bc his will is so strong he can become a god using jenova just for sephiroth to have actually been influenced by jenova bc his mind wasn't strong enough to withstand jenova's control from how hojo raised him will not leave my mind
#sephiroth#jenova#hojo#is this sentence even understandable? idk#for the record I don't necessarily think this was the og intention#but whatever
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
questions...
#good omens spoilers#gos2spoilers#good omens season 2#good omens#goodomensedit#crowley#gifs#og post#was skimming through all of good omens s2 for muriel screenshots (want to study face. want to draw)#and i was reminded of how crowley phrases his comment to muriel#and i felt like a lightbulb went off in me brain#like i don't think its necessarily intentional or means anything but#crowley encouraging muriel 2 ask questions. that questions are okay.#the same fucking thing that got him thrown outta heaven#(also it got me rotating a post by @bemusedlybespectacled in me brain once more about angels being in an environment that cultivates#their gullibility. because questions = bad. i just rbed it again)#anyway all these gifsets are just the product of me being inordinately obsessed with a live action media and also suffering from art block#like drawing fanart of real guys is hard let alone when i can barely draw fake guys#anyway#im trying. i have ideas. i just have to. do it
131 notes
·
View notes
Text
Litchrally like one of the top three things that are Very Important to me about OP (tfp) is the bit where he was, for all intents and purposes, a Decepticon. My IDEAL dynamic is basically
The kids, Orion Pax arc: wait, so Optimus was a Decepticon?!!
Ratchet: ACTUALLY, that's HIGHLY SIMPLIFYING a COMPLEX MATTER. back then there WERE no autobots and decepticons. we were not at WAR, so there were NO FACTIONS, so NO, he was definitely NOT A DECEPTICON. the IDEA. the NERVE.
----------------
The kids, post Orion Pax arc: so.... You were like the OG Decepticon?
Optimus: yeah
#like i don't necessarily think hes....proud of it but i think he'd be like YOU KNOW IN THE BEGINNING IT WAS A NOBLE CAUSE#and ratchet being like ARE YOU SURE. ARE YOU SURE#basically i just like any version of op that's not like..... squeaky clean morality. like i think home dog is like.#like there was a fracture where they split but i think its important and fascinating to consider that HE AGREED WITH MEGATRONS APPROACH#AND IDEALS BACK IN THE DAY. THATS SOOOO INTERESTING#basically the concept of og decepticon orion pax being a facet of autobot leader optimus primes personality#is very important to me lol#the road to hell is paved with good intentions and i think if he and megatron hadn't fallen out hed still be walking that road
198 notes
·
View notes
Text
honestly it's been really healing being back to actively contributing things and writing out thoughts on tumblr the last week or so, because while twitter tends to be easier for me to write out Thoughts on without getting overwhelmed, the environment in the twitter fandom circles i'm interested in is not only infested with antis but cliqueish in a way that is caustic to the fucking soul if you try to express a thought that's more than three sentences long--a hundred times over if you're autistic in slightly the wrong way--and it's incredibly reassuring to come back to an environment where the very kindest and most inclusive people toward you are not clearly thinking the r-slur the entire time they interact with you lmao
#whosebaby talks#took an incident of just open petty cruelty the other day for me to finally go#you know what all of this is doing a huge number on my self-esteem and scrupulosity and social anxiety and mental health overall#sometimes it pays to hold out and give the benefit of the doubt#when your knee-jerk reaction is to think something Must Be a Sign of Shitty Intent; bc often it will turn out that wasn't the case at all#but unfortunately sometimes it turns out people are in fact just being shitty in exactly the way you thought they were#and at the *very* best you are incompatible in such a way that if they don't have bad intentions you're just never going to be able to tell#or well. not even necessarily bad *intentions*; just shitty behavior that's harmful to you regardless of whether they mean well#sometimes you just gotta accept that even if neither of you *is* being shitty it's not worth your peace of mind to never be able to confirm#and it's better to just save both of you the stress and not try to pursue that.#it fuckin sucks when it's people you think are cool and really want to get to know; it's a hard lesson to learn; but it's the way sometimes#......and then sometimes the confirmation you finally get is that yeah okay this is some bullshit#and not in a way that can likely be communicated past; no matter how much effort you make to be kind; clear; and mature#and being publicly humiliated for carefully trying to yes-and some clarification on meta of mine#which was being used in ways i was deeply uncomfortable with; and had had no warning would take the turn that it did#and which was contributing to the original post gaining traction in the first place#all targeted in ways pretty much tailor-made to hurt someone with specific issues they had seen me talk about + acknowledged#was just. yeah i think i'm done here lmao#i am Not someone who takes down meta once posted#so the fact that it was bad enough to make me delete an entire thread really says something lol#anyway. lots of other context there; and i appreciate that in some ways the person was genuinely trying to be kind; but i'm. yeah.#that shit Hurted Extremely; and made me realize that while i'm not the *most* well-socialized or articulate or approachable#there is just something in the water over there and no amount of The Problem Not Being Me would have mattered#and the nice asks/replies/comments i've gotten both recently and during hibernation make me feel warm inside; thank y'all <3#the salt files#bullying cw#ableism cw
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Maybe it's just me, but part of why I never really felt completely secure in being public about my own artistic endeavors was how... being proud of yourself in any capacity for any reason is almost a faux pas, if that makes sense.
I've noticed how it's almost expected to perform the air of humility, but is that humility? Is it humility to say, "Oh, I'm sorry for clogging your feed with my awful art" or anything to the effect of self-deprecation?
I think that's why I so often gravitate toward those who make "bad art." There's a sense of freedom that is only achieved with the level of hubris that being unashamed in the number of people who hate your art. I wonder, though, how many people don't hate the art as much as they hate that they can't chastise the artist into humility, into recognizing how "terrible" an artist they "actually" are?
#art#i have clinical enough anxiety to not need people to expect self-deprecation from me when i do anything...#i always find it fascinating and almost freeing to see an artist make their own shit and be PROUD of that work#i unironically need to watch the room because that's the type of energy that i need so desperately#i do genuinely wonder if the largest critics of some of the 'worst' pieces of art do just tend to hate that the artist is openly prideful...#...that it isn't necessarily the art itself that completely enrages them but that they don't have the weapon of shame and humiliation...#...to put the artist 'back in their place' (the bottom)?#maybe i've been overanalyzing people's intention but i do wonder#i'm not saying you aren't allowed to dislike art (i dislike SO much art)...#...what i am saying is not all hatred of art is created equal and not all of it is something that is really as bad as it's portrayed#i need to emphasize that you are allowed to dislike art for whatever reason. there's some art i don't like for pretty petty reasons...#...but i don't think that requires me demanding artists to be ashamed and self-deprecate whenever they dare show their pieces#i think so many people are conditioned into self-hatred that anybody who shows any level of self-respect is off-putting though#like that's something i've really noticed a lot#and i think this is an aspect of the trend towards seeing self-hatred as neutral and even good
44 notes
·
View notes
Text
FUCK
solar eclipse this black like his soul that do you know what ELSE John's eyes kinda look like?
The fucking 8 ball.
#the locked tomb#not tagging homestuck because WRONG JOHN KRONK#also for the record I don't necessarily think this is relevant. or even intentional. but gsgsgdhhsfs#chaos has theories
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
somehow i feel like reading this book as someone who is very very far from being a keefe fan made it easier
#unraveled spoilers#i didn't expect to care about this book at all tbh#and there were many times in this book in which i felt keefe was making the absolute worst decision/having the most nonsense thoughts#but that somehow made him more likeable to me?#idk we see him usually through sophie's pov where she's usually pretty positive about whatever he says/does (even when she shouldn't be)#and i think that's what irked me the most before. this idea that we're supposed to love keefe bc he's way more perfect than fitz#idk i think keefe is a super unreliable narrator and i don't necessarily blame shannon for there being a lot of fitz negativity#i say this as a fitz fan. keefe has a very messed up perspective on a lot of things rn and unraveled made that pretty clear#however. it does make me stand by my thinking that chapter 42 came too early#even if sophie had reached a calm point of sorts in her emotional journey keefe was still deep in whatever he's going through#anyway i know i tend to have a very optimistic view of new keeper books#but this is the first book for a while that i genuinely don't think the intention is to kick sophie and fitz's relationship while it's down#it's simply that alvar and keefe are just...not big fans of him rn? although i do think alvar went a bit hard on the fitz hating#anyway to connect this back to my og post. not liking keefe made it way easier to me to like the book bc i just treated it like a book-#-where i'm supposed to think the protagonist is super fucking wrong#ok long tags over. damn that was a lot
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
🤡
#i know i've been kinda meh towards them in the past#but i'm really starting to warm up to AUs!#i'm writing a couple of them now#so not trying to be a hypocrite lmao#but i think it's just so fun to make different choices and explore different avenues for these characters that we love so much#i think as long as it's still intentional and thought-out#AUs are super cool!#i don't necessarily wanna throw these characters in a blender and hope for the best#in other words putting characters in situations just to fill a role vs. making it clear WHY they're in that role#but it is fun not to be as constrained by canon as a more canon complaint fic#like canon divergent is technically an AU#those + canon compliant/canon-setting fics are still faves of mine ofc#but love when i can change a name or species or whatever for the ~narrative#anyways#i'm rambling#tragic clowning#tragic clown actually writes#writing#au talk
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
There's something fascinating about how the dynamic between gil and shiv in this austerlitz scene reads like an early parallel to roman and mencken in what it takes
#succession#succession scripts#ideological flirting indeed#kind of lol moment at the idea of a centrist liberal being pulled to the socialist dem side#being paralleled by a republican being seduced by fascism but i don't think that's necessarily the intent
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
wizardry as portrayed in pop culture is very much related to historical alchemy, which of course evolved into modern chemistry
therefore, it makes sense that wizard school is 80% lab practicals. chemistry is a Weird Degree even compared to the other physical sciences- the blue collar of white collar subjects, i've heard people describe it as. so if you're confused as to why Wizard School is like that, look no further than chemists!
#i don't think this is necessarily intentional by authors#but it ends up being the case#in almost every series with a wizard school
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
What if the 3rd place ribbon. next to Steve (behind Nancy's hair) is because he's actually third place in her affections....
#jancy/ronance/stancy#i don't think necessarily in thar order 🤭#ronance truther here#but either way steve is in last place#NOT TO ME THO I LOVE U STEVIE#stranger things#st set design#idk it just seems funny that nancy would display a 3rd place ribbon#she seems like such a perfectionist that she'd only be proud of 1st place#so it seemed like an intentional set choice#to me#nancy wheeler#anti stancy#st theories#stranger things theory#st theory#stranger things theories#ronance nation#byler tumblr
29 notes
·
View notes
Text
I waffled on adding this to my previous post, but it's rotating in my head at top speed and I can't let it go, so...
The term for atonement used by both the chapter title and Ayumi in Japanese is 贖罪 shokuzai. Gramatically, this is perfectly sound and normal but here's what I can't stop thinking about.
The character 贖 (shoku) that makes up the first half of the word is also used to describe sacrificial lambs and scapegoats.
Based on how Ayumi describes Ai... I feel like that speaks for itself.
#i don't think this was intentional necessarily#but it is very thematically and motifically yummy#i have no idea if motifically is a real word but deal w it#oshi no posting#onk spoilers#ayumi hoshino
9 notes
·
View notes