#I believe that AI is a tool like many other tools that can have both positive and negative uses... like anything else

[scarletfasinera]

Got blocked before I could ever even see the message lmao. The answer is that I am a Communist, and as a Communist, I've read Wage Labor & Capital. hope this helps

[catsofcydonia]

People who hate AI really don’t realize how ridiculous — and especially contradictory — they sound. AI, for them, is somehow both the most terrible and the most useless tool, but even then, you're all panicked and angry about it?

LLMs (which I guess is what you mostly hate, because I don’t see you here complaining about your recommendation algorithms — which, surprise, are also AI models, just not generative) are powerful tools.

Is there stolen information involved? Yes. Sometimes it’s sensitive — and that’s wrong, and I do care, and I think it should be stopped. But in most cases, it’s stuff I honestly don’t care about: like research papers (not because of the researchers, but because fuck Elsevier — and if you’re against that, then I guess you’re also against Sci-Hub, which I’ll always support), or your furry drawings — sorry, I don’t care.

Your arguments against AI art are, in many cases, classist and anti-art. And the amount of hate thrown at people who use AI is honestly scary. People who use AI are not your enemy. They’re not inferior, and they’re not superior either. Using a tool or not isn’t inherently good or bad.

(And don’t start with the environment — you don’t really care. There are plenty of things you do every day that harm the planet more than AI usage, and you’re not giving those up.)

What really makes you mad is that now other people can profit from this, while you work hard and still earn very little. And honestly? I get that. But the people using AI aren’t the problem — they’re also just trying to survive.

The real enemy — as always — is capitalism.

And let me be clear: I do value your work. I do think that a random AI-generated image isn’t the same as a piece of carefully crafted art (though I also believe it’s totally possible to make incredible, high-level art with AI — I’ve seen amazing artists do it). I want you to have a life where your needs are met and you can enjoy your craft and get paid fairly for it.

But if that’s not happening, blame the system — not the tool. And definitely not the people using it.

Capitalism thrives when you misdirect your anger. So please — stop doing exactly what it wants.

[genericpuff]

ok as someone disabled with severe motor skill issues i really hate the argument that "anyone can learn art" and that it's completely accessible to everyone. it's not. there are lots of disabled folks who are getting left out of this discussion with the ableist argument that anyone can do art and if you can't you're just not trying hard enough (which is an argument a lot of abled people tend to use against disabled folks in general). i'm against ai art and will never use it but we have got to stop acting like art is an accessible hobby to everyone because there is unfortunately a lot of people who would love to become artists but will never be able to because of our disabilities.

nah you right! I try to be mindful of that sort of thing but it does admittedly fly under my radar at times because I'm not someone living with a physical disability (and thus it's not as front-of-mind as someone who is) so thanks for catching me on that, many apologies. My argument was regarding the people I've seen who have exclusively used "well I've tried to learn how to draw and it's hard / took too much time / etc." as their driving argument (of which there are just. so many) when like. these are realities for many artists who have been doing this for years, too, including those who are disabled. yeah, making art takes time and practice and a lot of hard work! welcome to the party LOL

but I also understand how keeping that argument so simplified can be exclusionary to those who do genuinely face barriers when pursuing art due to living with disabilities. I've met and observed the work of many disabled artists - webcomic artists, game designers, musicians, etc. - who are out there making their stuff and it comes with all its own unique struggles that shouldn't be forgotten about or overlooked in the discussion regarding AI art, struggles that bar many people from even getting into making art from the starting gun.

I do genuinely believe that art can come from anywhere, that anyone is capable of expressing themselves through whatever medium that compels them... but you're right that many artistic mediums in and of themselves are not wholly accessible to everyone. And I hope to god that more tools are developed to help those who are both working artists as well as aspiring ones.

But AI, in its current state, just isn't one of them. And I'm seeing this sentiment being yelled from the rooftops by many disabled artists who firmly believe that the ends do not justify the means - that they don't want the medium to become more accessible if it comes at the cost of other artists (many who are disabled themselves!) whose work and livelihoods are being replaced with cheap carbon copies. AI art doesn't allow anyone to actually participate in the joy of creating straight from the heart, it just takes from others' joy and spits it back out with an impression of what it thinks the joy of creation is supposed to look like through lifeless pixels. That's not even getting into just how much damage it's already actively causing to our environment, and how quickly AI has started to replace other surrounding industries as well.

Separately from that, you're right, paying for art is a luxury for many, but that's all the more reason why we shouldn't be supporting the current climate surrounding AI IMO which is the crux of what my argument was in that previous Simpsons meme post. Many people do face severe limitations in trying to create their art; the people I'm referring to who are heavily pro-AI are often not those same people and only face the limitations of their own entitlement, which is destroying the livelihoods of many human artists. Is it worth participating in AI art to save money if that same participation perpetuates a growing system that's costing people their livelihoods?

Maybe some day we'll get AI tools that are less predatory and destructive and help those who want to create art do so. Maybe we'll finally get some stricter regulations around what companies are allowed to get away with in their respective industries. I'd like to think also that the rise of AI art will, by extension, make human-made art all the more valuable. And I'd be lying if I said I didn't wish for tools that made making webcomics just a teeeeny bit more efficient without being completely unethical LOL But until any of those scenarios prove to be true, we're dealing with a monster of our own design that will never stop eating even after we've all been consumed. The toothpaste is out of the tube.

[aevellewritessometimes]

TS OCs Part One

Note: Not only can I not draw, I also do not have the tools necessary to make art anyway! Therefore, I am just going to use a Picrew for my OCs and just type everything else :)

Jireh; Wayward Prophet

Playlist: YouTube {} YT Music

Full Backstory: TBA

Physical Description:

Height: 5'11" (180cm).

Many scars all over body---especially on back and torso.

Figure skater build with a bit of fat.

Fake gold jewelry.

Right eye is just completely missing. There's nothing but a socket under that eyepatch.

Character Bio:

Pronouns: They/Them

Day of Birth: February 12th

Celebrated Birthday: May 19th

Personality: Spiritless Wanderer

Likes: Sunlight, sleeping in, writing poetry (badly), gold jewelry, fluffy things

Dislikes: Judgemental people, bad food, the smell of blood, confined spaces

Fatal Flaw: Tendency to overestimate themself, and will inflict themself with harsh punishments when they fail to meet their own standards.

Other: Mildly allergic to cats, but will pet them anyway.

"Pain is just as inevitable as death."

Narrative Description:

Eridia's seen its fair share of strangers, and Jireh is no exception. Those who make it past their initial abrasiveness find them to be quite empathetic, even if they have a very unconventional way of showing it. Oddly enough, they have a bit of a knack for knowing more about others than they let on---their time spent in their old cult causing them to be particularly susceptible to others in terms of emotions and magic, among other things. It's an unfortunate ability to have, however, when it comes to someone being affected by their curse.

-=-=-=-=-

Jireh believes themself to be a danger to those around them, and not just because of their curse. Their initial plan was to simply find a cure to their curse, and then leave everything behind in search of a fresh start. That was, until their options started to become much more complicated than what they initially anticipated, and now they're conflicted on whether or not they should leave or stay. As far as they're concerned, both options lead to suffering, but which is worse; to just get it over with, or to put it off until later?

Reasons for Attraction:

(Why are they attracted to each LI?)

Kuras: His kindness. If kindness is a rarity in Eridia, then it's practically nonexistent to Jireh. Although Kuras's nature is an oddity to them, it is something they would like to get used to, if given a chance.

Leander: His acceptance. When the cultists learned on the true nature of their curse, they were tossed out like waste from a chamberpot. When the one person they truly considered a friend learned of exactly what their curse does to people, she immediately tried to put them down as if they were a rabid animal. When Leander was made of aware of their curse, he welcomed them with open arms---literally and figuratively. They're somewhat wary of his acceptance, but they can't deny how nice it is to not feel ostracized for once.

Vere: His ears and tail. There's many things about Vere that caught Jireh's interest, but they are, first and foremost, a sucker for soft things.

Ais: His enigmatic nature. Although Jireh is used to---and somewhat tired of---assholes who either can't be or are unwilling to be anything other than vague, Ais isn't nearly as easy to read as they thought he'd be. Maybe it's something about how he cared so much about the first impression he left on them, as opposed to just scaring the shit out of them for fun.

Mhin: Their reactiveness. Jireh is a tease and Mhin is very reactive to teasing. While there are more reasons for Jireh to find them likable further down the road, Mhin's reactiveness is certainly one of the first things to draw them in.

Stats:

Strength: 3

Luck: 1

Wisdom: 1

Pain Tolerance: 4

Guilt: 5

Lore:

No matter how terrible a situation, there will always be someone around to try and make themself superior while making everyone else's life much worse. The citizens of Balos*, a small beach-side village, are no strangers to this; thanks to a cult that had been established somewhere nearby.

The cultists worshiped a strange god; one that brings suffering and rewards the resilient. At first, they weren't much of a problem; just some preachers who could easily be ignored. It wasn't until they had raided a dying man's house and taken his two supposedly "blessed" children that they came into any true power.

Recently, the townsfolk have noticed an influx of runaway cultists crying about how everything they believed was a lie. While the locals were happy to see that their tormentors were falling apart in front of their eyes, there was also fear for what those remaining might do in order to regain their power.

Flower:

*got the name from a Filipino town name generator

Mallow

Protection

Healing

Tranquility

Mallows are some of the few flowers to be favored by both the superstitious and the realists. Their supposed ability to cleanse a soul of its suffering and their proven ability to relieve pain make them a common sight in the gardens of both priests and doctors alike.

Name(s):

Meaning: "The Lord will provide"

Full Birth Name: Jude Malvar

Meanings: Jude: "Praised". Malvar: "Mallow plant".

Other/Past Name(s): N/A

Meaning(s): N/A

Other: They hate their name, but due to the practices of the cult they were raised in, they were not allowed to use their birth name. They cannot remember what it was, either. However, even if they did know their birth name, they also wouldn't like it simply because they wouldn't like the way it sounded.

Miscellaneous:

Voice: Something that's somewhat similar to Dreyla Alor (VA: Carole Ruggier)'s voice from Skyrim, except a bit raspier and less feminine. If that makes sense.

Culture/Language(s): The town they were born in loosely resembled post Spanish colonial Philippines, and their family spoke the TS universe equivalent of Tagalog. However, once they were taken in by the cult, they were forced to leave that culture and language behind. Although the cultists have biblical names, none of their beliefs line up with any abrahamic religions. I also do not know if there are any real world religions that I could compare their reliefs to. The most similar fictional religion, however, would be the worshipers of Molag Bal from the TES games. The cultists had their own language, but all members were expected to learn the common tongue as well.

Age: They think they're 26, but they're actually 27.

Talents: They have a lovely singing voice which they are fully unaware of. They are also capable of beating someone to death.

Extra: Very good at masking. Unaffected by hot weather. Afraid of Ais's "pets." Sometimes teases Mhin for their height. Somewhat put off by how Kuras and Leander do things "for free." Mediocre alcohol tolerance. Not a virgin; versatile leaning towards sub and a switch. Colorblind (tritanopia). Will sometimes sneeze if they're too close to Vere.

[dayshift-confessions]

saying "ai enabler ew" is not only straight up rude but also WILD considering this fandoms age ranges from young inexperienced adults to literal infants and what a fucking cesspit it is. dsaf fandom is NOT a safe space for minors for so many reasons. do YOU know why they use ai? would you rather put a possible minor at risk of grooming/abuse than to let them talk to their characters once in a while to help with loneliness? maybe they have bad anxiety or don't know how to socialize much! maybe they're disabled! maybe there are other reasons that they have a right not sharing with anyone! can you stop judging complete strangers for using a TOOL for what it is meant for when it's NOT about replacing creativity. shut the fuck up man

I get your point, but..

THIS IS NOT A CONFESSION

We are a confession page, I am so fucking done with all arguments.

Stop hiding behind the anon and talk to the person. Hiding doesn’t make people believe your point more.

I will be deleting all arguments from now on, things like this is the EXACT reason both mods aren’t doing the best. We shouldn’t have to be the middle man of all of these arguments.

[solar-wing]

Please, stop using ai in your writing 🥺👉👈

so here's the thing...and for context sake for me, I'm gonna assume you're the person who asked me before if I use AI in my writing.

Once again:

note where I said what I use it for! Proofreading my drafts, structuring my outlines, and helping me find words and phrases. for example...

or...

Trust and believe me, I have my fair use of looking up synonyms and phrases online outside of AI. Just look at my bookmarks.

Now, I want to take this moment to address something about my use of AI in my writing. For me, AI has become a tool that has helped me in my productivity. It removes some of the mundane and time-consuming aspects of the writing process, allowing me to channel more of my creative energy into crafting better stories.

I fully understand that everyone has their own perspective on this topic. Some choose to use AI, while others avoid it entirely, and I respect both positions. I also recognize the moral and ethical concerns some have about AI. However, the way I use it does not harm others or have a negative impact outside my platform. If I ever saw clear, concrete evidence that using AI was genuinely detrimental to authors as a whole, I'd 100% reconsider my use of it. But so far, I’ve mostly encountered personal opinions and feelings on the matter. While those feelings are valid, they remain just that—personal.

(EDIT:)

(Something to also consider, I have an Apple Laptop, a MacBook, and with their new features releases this year, specifically the Apple Intelligence, AI is quite literally built into my phone and laptop. So, again, if’s a tool that is available for me to use and it actually helps me, and it’s not harming others with my use or its use in general, then I will take advantage of it.)

What I take issue with is when those opinions are pushed onto me, especially when I haven’t asked for them and they’re delivered anonymously.

Now, let me be clear: I’m open to discussing this topic further if anyone has additional information they believe I should consider, but I prefer those conversations happen in private, not through my public inbox. My DMs are open for that kind of dialogue, and I promise those conversations will remain 100% confidential.

That said, this is the last time I will address this topic publicly. I’m always willing to hear feedback, but when it comes to questions about the tools and resources I use to create my work, I draw the line. I want this platform to remain a space for creativity, joy, and connection—not debates over personal tools.

To be clear, my inbox—especially the anonymous feature—is intended for discussions about stories, characters, requests, and similar topics. It is not the place for critiques of how I choose to create. I don’t want to feel forced into disabling it because of misplaced discussions.

If you’d like to share your thoughts or feedback with me privately, my DMs are open. Otherwise, I ask that we keep the focus on the stories and characters we all enjoy. At the end of the day, writing is something I’ve loved doing for as long as I can remember, and AI is just one of many tools I use to make that process more efficient. It’s not something I rely on, but it does help me, and it’s not something I feel the need to constantly justify. If AI disappeared tomorrow, I would still create stories—because that’s what I’ve always done, and that’s what I will continue to do.

Thank you for understanding, and let’s keep this space positive and fun for everyone.

Thank youuuu💛

[velvetjune]

replayed The Lake House dlc, so more of my thoughts under spoilers! (This is long)

I cannot believe how many things I missed during the first run of this game:

1. The whiteboard of the AI Alan Wake manuscript pages produced with evaluations. One repeating the word “scream” for half of a page gets praise for its wording and tone. “Pistol looked at flashlight in shock.” It must’ve been so much fun for the writers to make up all of these.

2. Jules Marmont has extra footage directly after the Dr. Darling video on the second floor if you go back. I don’t know what exactly triggers this video, but it was when I was doubling back to get the black rock weapon.

3. The research archives appear normally from above, then shift multiple times, before returning to normal (… as normal as the shelves infinitely repeating is). This happened in the first playthrough, but I was stressed over my survival and never noticed.

4. The research archives actually go through areas with different mediums/classifications. There’s tagged artifacts/photos, tapes, film, books, and it ends with paintings. It’s nothing mind bending, but the detail was nice to see.

5. Diana’s tape on the tortured artist and human experimentation. This, with Jules’ video, only added to their monstrosity.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Black Rock Launcher is used in a similar way in FBC Firebreak. It wouldn’t be the same, but this felt so much like a set up for the kind of strange and innovative tools that FBC employees experiment with, especially when trapped in a lockdown at the Oldest House with access to Black Rock Quarry. Maybe Emily can finally make her black rock knives!

It’s hard to not think of Alan and Alice when it comes to any other creative characters in relationships in this game and the hardships with balancing that sorta life. There’s the Bookers with Tammy, a successful true crime writer and attempted poet (!!!), and Ed, a playwright trying to get recognition and feel inspired. It feels right that he would end up taking Wake’s work to write the Marmonts (also with shades of Alan and Alice) into their own supernatural lakeside cabin, fit with a marriage that’s falling apart.

The actors for both Marmonts are incredible. They both perfectly portray their outrage, jealously, and stubbornness that’s consuming their relationship and work. This mad scientist drama could easily end up too cheesy, but they sell it. Love that these negative emotions and their attempt to enforce it on artists for their suffering lead to the crack in the lake house through them. There’s so many things to pick at in this dlc, whether for the relationships, work environments, ai, artists, etc.

Only for this bullet point, but Final Draft Spoilers: Diana thinking of Jules’ smile as her last moment before being taken, while Jules’ last moment (‘Breakthrough in the Lake House’ page) is feeling pride over his work…………

I want more office drama for horrible mad scientists for Control 2. Honestly I want anything Control 2

After briefly checking online, I’m proud of myself for quickly solving the calendar problems. I actually really liked this kind of simple task to find little clues and, by doing so, getting to know the people through their passwords. I’m terrible anything with puzzles, so very grateful to have this over something elaborate or. math.

The Dylan scene is also skippable, which is unthinkable (one of the best parts of the dlc!). There’s all this disgust and horror from Estevez towards the Marmonts’ control of the Lake House, only for it to reveal that Dylan was also trapped there and experimented on by Dr. Darling and the researchers there (all approved by Trench!). Estevez isn’t aware of this, but it was a cold reminder of how truly awful it was for Dylan and how fucked up Trench and Darling are for kidnapping a child…. And then abandoning him in a small prison cell.

The horror elements in this DLC were nice, although not extreme. Tbh I don’t consider any of Remedy’s games to be scary, even if they’re still horror, but this had good moments! The distortion of the environment and constant looping made me doubt myself. Jules’ death as a taken was violent (albeit obscured), to the level of Nightingale’s cult attack, if not worse. Loved the emotion from the Marmonts seeping into their taken personalities. Aw1 had more of this and it made the Taken far more upsetting and real.

Sometimes Alan is creepy and I enjoy seeing him through other characters’ eyes. Alan/the Dark Place manifesting manuscript pages that would perfectly dig under the Marmonts’ skins and infect them was unnerving and a little funny. shows they never had a chance. While it’s not physically like that, the words describing the Lake House slowly being sunken into Cauldron Lake and the water dripping in—Chef’s kiss

AWAN had a conversation between the scientist where she discussed fate and agency (…Alan’s indignation at her being remotely critical over her 😭 he’s such an asshole). It reminded me of Diana’s notes on whether Alan wrote and controlled her life. There’s some agency that Alan takes away just by guiding these events and trying to influence people through a story. How much is him actually controlling or changing things is another question, but having that kind of power is scary, especially from another’s POV (Saga, now Estevez and the Marmonts)

Estevez seeing Alan typing the later event of her meeting Saga and THIS being what led the FBC straight to her was a great scene of wrapping everything up. I liked the weird dark goo in the Dark Place. Fun stuff!

Poe <3 Loved this promo of her new song. 6 deep breaths coinciding with Estevez’ reassurance to herself, although the lyrics also could apply to others. Dylan trapped in his cage, yet able to connect to these worlds; Alan (+Alice) in the dark place, then post-game, ‘finding roads everywhere’. I’m playing the first Alan Wake, so the breathing made me immediately think of the deep breaths taken by Tom the Diver throughout that (+ the addition of another voice breathing near the end)

Clay Murphy wrote the screenplay to this and to Number One Fan (Night Springs), which means he might be the funniest person ever

[some-pers0n]

interesting ideas about AI art and by no means am I trying to send hate but I believe majority of people hate AI art is because it's truly just the byproduct of a giant plinko board bouncing through pieces of art made by artists who put love and care and SOUL into their work. A visual product of a math formula. While it's "art" in the most litteral sense, not having a true human behind it putting though and effort into its every detail, for many people (myself included) devalues it from a tradition artists work.

I'm a firm believer in the idea that AI art is inherently unequal to non Ai art, specifically for this reason. (Hope this made sense sorry if it's incoherent)

I agree in that sense there. I personally do not find myself wanting to engage in a work when I purposefully know the creator had used AI to create the entire product. Something something,,,I cannot find myself getting invested in something that is little more than a product. I don't wanna read a fic about my blorbos when it was written by Chat-GPT

I also agree with the idea that a lot of people hate AI art because of this heavily emotional, debatably reactionary mindset that stems from one thing: fairness. It's the same sort of emotion I find one gets if all of the work on a group project gets shafted onto them whilst their fellow peers sit idly by. It feels unfair to sink hours into your craft, spending all this time fighting to develop your skills and flourish as an artist, only to see someone type half a paragraph and have a machine spit back something that looks not half bad. Let's be honest with ourselves here and say that AI art, at least in a visual regard, has progressed quite a bit to the point where most of the mistakes people find can be dismissed as wonky perspective and the line art being a bit fucky, which is something a ton of artists struggle with too

People develop a sort of a superiority complex over it. I can't blame them honestly. A number of times I've felt it too when people tell me they're using Chat-GPT as though it were Google and when I see my family members and friends playing around with AI art. I gotta bite my tongue and choke back a chortle, both because it's kind of a dick move and also because I don't want to relish in this feeling. It's infectious though to feel as though you have an edge over another person just because you abstain from using Chat-GPT or whatever. Not to be all "grrgrgrr you should LOVE Chat-GPT and if you dare to say anything bad then you are EVILL!!" of course though. It's emotions. They're messy, intense, and oftentimes you don't really realize when you're feeling since you get locked into your perspective. Yet, I think it's important to realize a lot of hatred of this generative AI stems from emotions. Reactionary ideals and claims stem from emotions after all

I think ultimately what the conversation about generative AI should revolve around is about the concerns of labour. The several strikes from a while back from VFX artists and scriptwriters come to mind. They are most at stake from generative AI as tools like Chat-GPT are cheaper and more cost-effective than paying an actual employee for their time and effort. I would also mention the environmental issues, but if we were to talk about that we would also have to acknowledge the fact that so, so much water is being used up daily to generate power for servers. Hell, this post alone will probably contribute to drying up some marsh in the greater scheme of things

Anywho yada yada TL;DR: I agree yes but I also think it's important to recognize that a good chunk of your hatred to Chat-GPT stems from feeling cheated and a sense of pride and superiority over others for simply not using it. There is no quality to Chat-GPT that makes it inherently evil. I can't get upset at my grandma for sending me a photo of her and her dog that went through an AI anime filter. I can feel maybe some exhaustion when seeing a fellow classmate using Chat-GPT to write their essay, but ultimately I write my own work for the love of the game. I can get upset however at those in higher power who use it to push artists out of jobs. Chat-GPT is a tool that has its pros and cons and I think it's reductive to just basically sit there and hiss like a vampire when presented with a cross when faced with the mere word "AI", especially when your only big argument for disliking it is based purely in feeling cheated when someone types a prompt into a program and art that would've taken you seven hours to draw gets spit out in about a minute or two

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

Barry Blitt, The Kvetchbook

* * * * *

A suggested approach for dealing with the news.

February 7, 2025

Robert B. Hubbell

If you are struggling to make sense of the torrent of seemingly inconsistent news alerts pummeling you every 15 minutes, welcome to the club! One minute, things seem to be improving; the next minute, they are getting worse. I find the situation horribly disorienting and stressful.

Here is the mental construct I am employing to help me digest the news:

Two things are happening at once. Both are true. They are in opposition.

Thing one: Democrats are gaining a foothold in opposing Trump's coup—through the courts, through public opinion, and through legislative stalling tactics. Those are not complete defenses, and they take time. But they are the tools we have.

Thing two: Musk and Trump are accelerating their efforts to infect the federal government with AI computer viruses to assist in making drastic workforce and budget cuts in intelligence, law enforcement, health, science, and foreign aid. The sting of thing two is compounded by the complicity of congressional Republicans and the willingness of Trump supporters to lie with aplomb and feigned indignation

Thing one—the resistance—is trailing behind thing two—the pillaging and burning. To be sure, the resistance is catching up to the vandals. But playing “catch up” feels bad. It feels like we are losing and that there is no accountability. The sense of being “behind” is a temporary illusion created by the First Law of the Universe: It is easier to break things than to fix them.

Moreover, the velocity of the news combined with its jaw-dropping implausibility makes the tension between thing one and thing two difficult to track and comprehend. Well-meaning writers—like me—are creating a flood of content that attempts to keep track of important and urgent developments. The mere act of reading the list of “The Top 36 things that happened today” can be overwhelming.

I get it. I read many other newsletters written by smart and well-meaning people, and I often feel overwhelmed by the end of such articles. Why? I believe that the constant re-telling of the crises triggers our “fight or flight” sensors until they are saturated and shut down. We are left exhausted.

The comforting news is that we have all been here before in our personal lives, albeit in different circumstances. A car accident while unemployed. Battling cancer and experiencing the sudden death of a loved one. A hurricane followed by a once-in-a-thousand-year flood. A sexual assault and doubting police officers. Being bullied and harassed by a co-worker under a boss who doesn’t want to get involved.

Somehow, we managed to survive those crises. We put one foot in front of the other. We dealt with the circumstances we faced with the tools we had. And we have managed to make it to this point successfully.

We need to employ those same coping skills to deal with the political crises confronting us. Put one foot in front of the other. Deal with the circumstances we face with the tools we have. Fight in the present but take confidence from the long-term inevitability that we will prevail if we do not give up. Trump is an aberration whose time will pass.

Recognize that the cognitive dissonance of this moment is caused by two things being true at once: Democrats are gaining a foothold in opposing Trump's coup, and Trump is accelerating the chaos.

Do not be troubled by the inconsistent, see-saw nature of the news. That tension is a sign that we are beginning our long road to victory.

To help ease the cognitive load, I will reduce my commentary in this newsletter and categorize today’s news into comprehensible themes. I hope this helps!

All readers are welcome to join me on Saturday, February 8, at 9:00 a.m. PST / 12:00 noon EST for a Substack livestream session. Download and open the Substack App at the appointed time. I will send a reminder email 30 minutes in advance on Saturday morning.

Thing One—Democrats are gaining a foothold in opposing Trump's coup

Senate Democrats filibuster confirmation of OMB Director Russell T. Vought

See NYTimes, (accessible to all), Senate Democrats Hold the Floor in Overnight Protest of Trump Nominee. Democratic Senators heard their constituents, located their spines, and went down swinging. That outcome is far superior to losing on perfunctory votes that signal surrender. Keep it up!

Federal Judge delays Trump's deadline to federal workers to accept “Fork in the road” deferred terminations.

See Business Insider, Judge delays Trump's federal employee buyout deadline. To date, every time a judge has ruled on a lawsuit against a Trump executive order or illegal terminations, Trump has lost.

Labor Department barred from sharing information on employees with DOGE team

See Latin Times, Elon Musk's DOGE Blocked from Accessing Labor Department Data in Stunning Win for Unions

Employee unions sue to prevent termination of USAID workers

Two labor groups sued to prevent the Trump administration from invoking mass layoffs of USAID workers. See CNN Politics, Labor groups sue to halt Trump admin’s dismantling of USAID as workforce is expected to be slashed to under 300

Thirteen states plan to sue DOGE to prevent access to personal information about citizens

“Democratic attorneys general in several states vowed Thursday to file a lawsuit to stop Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing federal payment systems containing Americans’ sensitive personal information.” See AP News, 13 states to sue over DOGE access to government payment systems containing personal data.

House Democrats apparently secure agreement from Speaker Johnson to hold hearing on DOGE hacking of Treasury data

A letter released by two Democrats on the House Ways & Means Committee says that Speaker Mike Johnson agreed to hold a hearing on DOGE’s access to Treasury Department data. See Talking Points Memo, Dems Suggest They Got Johnson To Commit To Hearing On Elon’s Treasury Break-In

Senate Democrats demand VA Secretary deny DOGE access to veterans’ records.

See HuffPo, Democrats Demand VA Secretary Deny Elon Musk Access To Veterans' Private Records.

Disciplinary complaint filed against acting US Attorney in DC, Ed Martin

Acting US Attorney in DC, Ed Martin, represented one of the January 6 defendants. As acting US Attorney Martin just filed a request for dismissal of the case against his client—while he was still counsel of record for that client in a criminal proceeding. A legal advocacy group filed a disciplinary complaint against Martin in Missouri, where he is licensed. Martin tried to file a motion to withdraw as attorney for his client. The motion was rejected because he had allowed his membership in the DC bar to lapse. See Top Trump prosecutor in DC faces bar complaint for dismissing January 6 charges against client.

DOGE employee who posted racist statement resigns

Proving that public shaming can still work, the WSJ reported that one of Musk’s cadre of engineers had made vile racist posts, which he had attempted to remove. But the internet is forever and the posts were archived. When they were published on Wednesday, the employee resigned immediately. See The Independent, DOGE staffer quits after exposure of racist social media posts.

Thing Two-- Musk and Trump are accelerating their efforts

Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Attorney General Pam Bondi went on a legal terror campaign within the DOJ on Thursday. She did the following:

Disbanded a group of prosecutors assigned to prevent foreign interference in US elections. NBC News, Bondi ends FBI effort to combat foreign influence in U.S. politics.

Disbanded a group of prosecutors who targeted criminal activities by Russian oligarchs. Reuters, Trump administration disbands task force targeting Russian oligarchs.

Instructed the DOJ to investigate companies that promote diversity and inclusion through hiring and retention. Slate, Pam Bondi instructs Trump DOJ to investigate companies that do DEI.

Trump executive orders:

Trump signed an executive order sanctioning the International Criminal Court for “targeting Israel.” Trump signs executive order to sanction ICC, accusing court of targeting US and its ‘close ally’ Israel – live

NCAA bans transgender athletes after Trump signs executive order. Reuters, NCAA bans transgender women from sports a day after Trump executive order.

Foreign policy

Trump doubles down on Gaza takeover proposal despite bipartisan opposition | Donald Trump | The Guardian

Concluding Thoughts

Calls from constituents are overwhelming the staff of most members of Congress. Good! Keep it up—even if you have a Republican representative or Senator! Democrats appear to have received the message (finally) and are opposing / delaying confirmations of Trump's nominees. See The New Republic, “Disgusted” Democratic Voters Are Blowing Up Congress’s Phones.

Regardless of whether Senate Democrats can stop the confirmations, we need to know that they understand the depth of the crisis and will not cooperate with the party that is facilitating the coup.

And the calls to Republican members of Congress are also worthwhile—even if they do not succeed in changing the views of the GOP member of Congress. About 200 protesters showed up to protest outside Senator John Cornyn’s office. Cornyn sent a snide tweet that said,

Sorry to miss these folks from @IndivisibleTeam + @MoveOn protesting my state offices over my support of @realDonaldTrump’s nominees & all the good work @ElonMusk is doing with @DOGE," the senator said, sharing photos of protests outside his other Texas offices. "I hate to break it to them, but we are just getting started," Cornyn continued. "These people are really going to lose it when we extend the Trump tax cuts."

Although Cornyn blamed Indivisible and MoveOn for the protest, neither organization was involved. The protesters were Cornyn constituents who are dependent on military contracts for their livelihood and are terrified of the chaos Musk and Trump are causing.

Here’s the point: Cornyn took notice and sent a boastful tweet worthy of every schoolyard bully who feels his dominance is threatened. Cornyn is frightened, and his Freudian slip is showing.

Multiply that single protest by hundreds more, and it is clear that the emerging resistance is penetrating the consciousness of MAGA members of Congress. It is just a start, but it is a good one. Keep it up!!

[Robert B. Hubbell Newsletter]

[vivalgi]

Hi, I know you said you didn't people arguing with you, and that is not at all what I'm trying to do, but I do think this is important to point out. Feel free to ignore this ask. As an artist and someone who also hates AI and has had their own art detected as AI by AI art detectors, I do not believe that Bardric's current design was fully AI-generated (please do keep in mind that with AI nowadays it can be hard to tell for a fact unless confirmed by the artist or has the stereotypical AI art style). I know you make a lot of edits, but I'm not sure if you're an artist yourself. If you are, there is a chance you have more experience than me, in which case I would trust your word more (I've only been doing art for around 3 years). From what I can gather, most of the evidence you've pointed out are easy-to-make mistakes, with one not even being a mistake. Based on my understanding, this design is still technically concept art (I think they stated that in a story, correct me if I'm wrong) so mistakes are completely understandable. The lapel that looks like it's divided into three parts seems to be like a not-fully rendered part. If you were to use a smudge tool in that area, you would get something similar to the other lapel. Many digital artists try to not use a copy paste or symmetry tool in their art for one reason or another, to the point that if you look at other art with somewhat similar styles (like wlop's older art or Samdoesart's portraits with a lot of metal and jewelry) and you zoom in, you will see very similar things occuring. Personally, I've never seen AI generators do the "double vision effect" with such harsh edges, often being overly blended out. Based on the lighting (which seems to be coming from the upper-left) I'd assume it's a bounce light from the gold because if you look at the entire rim, you'll see it is meant to be above the lapel, not sewn onto it. Now, I will admit, I have 0 clue about what is going on with the pants. It both does and does not make sense (to me) and just gives me uncanny valley vibes. And I can make no comment on the belt as I have seen way too many kinds of belts out there in fantasy worlds (literally just google 'belt buckle fantasy' and you will see belts that make no sense, like, you can see the prong in some but not others and in so many of them it looks like the prong is melted into the buckle) when doing studies and getting some of my won so I have given up. Also, there are no egregious issues with the shadows. The light is coming from the front, not the back. Were it coming from the back, there would be rim lighting and the front of his face would not be shiny. If you find pictures with similar lighting, you will notice the collar makes a shadow on both the neck and the part beneath the collar (if it is on the side the light comes from). The lighting in this image makes total sense with any issues simply being minor mistakes even advanced artists do Once more, I am not expert, and I could totally be wrong. I am not a professional artist, especially not in the semi-realistic art style. However, I have notices a lot of artists who have been on the internet for ages and have proved many times that it is their own art are just now being called out for AI since their own art style is similar. Finally, keep in mind that a lot of artist follow the rule of "don't add too much detail if the image is understandable", again I point to wlop and samdoes art, but there's also rishidraws, Alberto Mieglo (make sure you're looking at his concept art, particularly spiderverse art, as some of his posts are fully finished products where he was required to add a lot of detail due to the size of the piece) and rossdraws. If you look at their art for long enough, you will notice a lot of similar artistic/stylistic decisions (aside from the part where the pants and shirt meet, again, I have no clue wtf is going on there) that you pointed out

Constructive conversation is always welcome. What happened on the other site was more like making fun and laughing off by crazed fangirls when I only dared to mention my suspicion and nothing more, so don't worry about annoying me with your post 😅

I can see why those artists you've mentioned could be accused of using AI due to their art style and it's a shame this is happening. I still trust myself more than any AI detector, even when all of them happen to agree with me. There's lots of things that could trigger those tools, even totally innocent ones, or just some barely noticeable filter.

I also wouldn't dare to say Bardick's art is fully AI, but I'm still pretty confident the process involved AI assistance. How exactly, I'm not completely sure. The evolution images are too low quality (and suspiciously late stage drawings as someone pointed out) to fully understand the process. I haven't really had a chance to try AI-assisted art creation myself (not sure my PC can handle it and the tools online have been pure scam and gambling so far), but it seems similar to what I've seen on videos: the artist starts with a sketch (or AI generated image), feeds it wholly to AI (again) or masks certain areas to regenerate, sketches over again, fixes some things, another round of AI, rinse and repeat, until finally adding finishing touches.

The right lapel's triangularly placed sticks certainly aren't just lazy brush strokes in a non-focus area. They're too detailed for that, having proper shading, highlights and maybe even shadows, yet don't make any sense compared to the other side.

That corner even seems to change slightly between the last two evolution images (although too low quality once again):

(the skin tight shirt is also something AI likes to do, although no abs sticking out this time 😛)

Maybe you're right and the double lines around the hem really are intended to be a reflection or something but even then it would be such an unnecessary detail to add.

I can see it could have been badly worded but I didn't claim that the light comes from the back, that's why I pointed out why the coat's collar leaving a shadow on the shirt was strange, as if the light was cast from behind, unlike the rest of the image. Before daring to write about the shadows, I must admit I even put on my white shirt and played around with phone's flashlight in front of the mirror 😅, so I'm pretty sure there's too much shadow on the shirt below the collar. Some shadow and shading due to light getting trapped under the collar would have been normal, like this quick 1-min smudging:

...but otherwise it's impossible to get two such clear and large shadows on both sides with a single light source.

Why I've been wary of Candlelight when it comes to the use of AI, is because Andrew was the creative force behind Storyloom (creative director according to Linkedin) and there was at least one book series made by PB - Season of Love - that heavily used AI generated assets (some Youtube playthroughs still exist). Like you, I also remember there being a comment or post from CL about the stage of Bardick's design but I'm already doubting myself if it was claimed to be final or not and I can't find the post anymore. I'd like to believe we've only seen the concept. From what I understood then the character arts are outsourced, so there's some chance they're not even aware about the use of AI.

Link to my post we're talking about

[shrimpmandan]

The current state of AI discourse is baffling to me because I swear to god some people are just developing collective amnesia and dismissing AI art as "not actually being that bad" when the problems with it are significantly deeper than whether or not it's "real art". It being "real art" is irrelevant to it causing tangible harm. Like yeah I don't think someone AI generating an image to use as a reference is some massive evil, but in the greater scheme of things:

AI art is being used to spread actual real-world misinformation. Propaganda.

Ai art is being used to spread CSEM and other forms of revenge porn. It is also threatening the livelihoods of sex workers to some degree.

People are putting their favorite artists' works through a blender, without their consent, instead of paying them, because image generation is instant dopamine.

Big corps are trying to use AI instead of paying artists/writers because they're greedy fucks.

Most AI programs (with few exceptions) are scraping from existing works without the consent of the original artists.

AI voices are doing the same.

A common argument I've seen is comparing these things to like... digital art, photo editing*, voice splicing. You have to understand that the merit of these things isn't that "they take more time/effort". Effort is not an inherent facet of art. Plenty of tools exist to make art easier that we take for granted now-- many forget the discourse that kicked up when digital art was first gaining popularity. The issue is and always will be consent. Most artists do not want their works or voices to be put into AI databanks. The fact that most AI programs do not care for this, and that a lot of companies are trying to swindle their way into getting artist consent under the pretense of "well they didn't say no", is the main issue. We completely lost the plot when we started focusing more on "is AI art real art?" and "is it bad to use AI for any purpose?", because those are both irrelevant to the question of "is AI harmful?", wherein the answer is yes. This is also failing to consider that "real art" can also cause harm for similar reasons: sexual harassment/revenge porn, defamation, propaganda, etc.

*As a note, this is also ignoring the fact that a lot of people DON'T want their art to be edited or even heavily referenced. It's been commonplace in art usage terms for ages now. This is important to note in the context of AI discourse and copyright law. I also believe there is a difference between voice splicing and AI voices since splicing is more limited and way less likely to get someone actually defamed or 'replaced' as a voice actor, and is just a manipulation of existing voice clips mostly for silly shitposts.

AI CAN be helpful. AI can be used to create references, or make smoother rendering, or even just for fun. A lot of people used AI programs in their baby stages without thinking about how the images were generated or the actual consent of the artists involved, because it was a fun shiny new toy. I also like to think most people who have the means to pay an artist ultimately would. But the issue is not and never has been AI making art easier, or people using it for silly shit, or even people using it for serious art refs. The issue is AI mass-scraping existing artwork, being used to facilitate misinformation, and screwing artists out of jobs. Don't even get me started on AI fucking generating CSEM, or revenge porn, and additionally how it impacts the careers of sex workers.

AI is an issue in its current state. Yes, the panic about it taking over art as a whole was overblown, even if the fears were valid. The capacities of AI art is almost always slightly below the capacities of human-made art, and it's something that will quickly fall in popularity once it stops being the shiny new thing. People using AI to make art easier aren't the enemy either, especially since this can be beneficial for people who do it as a job-- shortening the labor time and all. That doesn't mean AI isn't an issue and that everyone critiquing it is actually just an elitist ableist cuck or whatever. None of this really would've been a problem if not for the mass scraping, resulting in both violations of artist consent, and also it picking up genuinely illegal/nasty content. That's what we should be focusing on. None of this "real art" bullshit.

All that said: I personally would say that using most AI programs-- no matter the purpose-- is unethical because of how most of them function. The only exceptions would be for programs that specifically use consensually obtained data. On this front, I would highly recommend keeping tabs on Adobe Firefly, since it's one of the very very few models out there that has stated a clear commitment to not violating the copyright and consent of artists or persons (it operates off of stock footage and public domain).

[thewolfno11-blog-blog]

MIO: Memories in Orbit Lore analysis Part 1

Honestly, I was not quite sure I should post this. Yet after putting all my thoughts down, I felt good. So, I figured, "Sure, why not?". Might as well make at least one person happy.

So here it is, my interpretation and analysis of MIO: Memories in Orbit. Spoilers if you haven't played the demo or seen all the trailers.

First, let's remind everyone that this game takes place in the Vessel, a living spaceship drifting aimlessly through space. The Vessel is maintained by AI caretakers, the Pearls. They were the only caretakers, but it did seem they had other robots working for them. The Vessel once housed many robots and a group called the Travellers, but it seems they are no longer around. Before we discuss that, let's take a look at the Pearls.

In travellers log 'Grateful', a traveller expresses their gratitude towards the six Voices.

Giving that these titels are functions of body and mostly provide said function, I believe these 6 are our pearls. Interesting to note that at very beginning of the demo we see 6 symbols.

Some of these symbols can be seen all over the Vessel in the demo. Making me believe that one symbol represents a Pearl and that they have jurisdiction over a specific area or thing. For example, we can connect the first symbol quite easily. Namely, the Spine.

With Shii at the bottom we learn that the Spine is spread across the Vessel like a nervous system; the Nexus. Just like the human body, where most nerves are united in the spine. Shii is interesting to note because he seems to be the actual Spine we talk to. I do wonder what we need to do in order for the pearl/eye to open up.

Next up, I believe this one is the Breath

The breath is supposed to provide air to the Vessel. And no other being does that better than the plants. They were not just in charge of providing air, but also growing food and storing it. And these robots also seem to confirm that the Feral Undergrowth and Haven are under the Breath's domain.

Although it seems the Breath has fallen asleep for some reason. In the gameplay trailer, a voice says: "My garden... it grew boundless... from Eye to Heart... Livlier than ever". I think this means we can reach both the Eye and Heart from the area under the Breath's jurdistiction.

Next up, the Blood.

Now this symbol is seen all over the Dwellings and Metropolis, possibly the primary place of residence for the Travellers. Makes sense as the Blood is in charge of warmth. Yet one day, he suddenly stopped and both the Dwellings and Metropolis were turned into an icy wasteland. So what happened to him? Well, at first I thought this was him

But I quickly realised that this was most likely not the case. In fact when you follow this air vent to the bottom.

We have something similair to the a Pearl. It might be that the Blood could move around. Like actual blood, .He might even challange Mio, wich would explain this boss fight.

There was one shot I found that might be the actual Pearl. This is from the demo trailer

These strands we see on other Pearls as well and the cold enviroment makes me believe this is the Blood main body.

Next up i believe is the Hand

It's a bit dark, but in the last image, we see the symbol of the first image. The Hand is in charge of making tools and every place we seen so far that is red seems to be part of a factory. I think that the 30 second demo trailer is her voice. Even if they don't seem very friendly. I do believe she's looking for Mel, for some reason. Mel does look like he works for the Hand, but it seems they had a falling out. I wonder about what, though.

The last one I believe we have a picture of is the Eye.

I'm guessing this is the Eye because when the symbols are introduced, this was the top one. Usually where your eyes are. Not to mention that it is the Eye's job to be a lookout and/or watch over the Travellers.

What's so interesting about the Eye is that it seems like MIO herself was sent from it in the beginning cutscene of the demo. And in the very first trailer we see MIO encounter they eye quickly after awakening and later they seem to be chilling with each other. In a way MIO might be something like Shii, a part of the Pearl, but somehow she still her own being. The reason why MIO was sent in the first place does remain a mystery.

Lastly, we have the Heart, and by process of elimination, I believe this would be his symbol.

We don't know a lot about them. We know they one day the Heart started causing tremors. Resulting in destruction in other parts of the Vessel. But it's interesting to note that the Heart and Spine were quite connected to one another

Well those were my thoughts on the Pearls, would love to hear more from other people.

[plaguedoctormemes]

i'm not deleting my tumblr blogs but this whole debacle with the AI stuff is discouraging me to at least not post original content here and limit my time on social media in general. Also to be clear on my stance on AI, which I think is very much influenced by my background as both an artist and a professional graphic designer: I think it can be a very useful tool and I don't even necessarily inherently find it completely harmful. Some forms of AI are already well used and completely normalized, but I find most of the time generative AI as we know it is pretty harmful and its harms outweighs its benefits currently (largely grifts, scams and misinfo). It needs regulation desperately, but old cunt politicians are too dumb to really care about or understand how important the issue is right now. I do not believe that AI will simply peter off or crash. From a marketing standpoint, i feel like AI usage will cool off or become more specialized (like creating whole machines *just* trained on individual brands for personal use and whatnot) but I have no idea how far away that would be. I just believe there might come a time where everyone is over the "spectacle" of generative AI and will find it inaffective or inherently associated with cheapness. At least in the most base sense in advertising, it is generally much better to have your own photographs and original branded artwork as it proves authenticity. You can only see a illusionist do so many tricks before you're bored by them and expect them, and we're already getting to the point where even the average Joe is tired of hearing about AI and the future, and at least when it comes to art and writing i just... don't care? i don't give a shit about it. BACK TO TUMBLR: I'm aware that its likely that mine and everyone elses' posts here have already been scraped. My thing is that it's more the symbolism of Tumblr's "opt-out" choice: memorial blogs, inactive blogs, and so on are going to be scraped without consent. No banners or pop ups to notify users of this change, you either have to either HAPPEN UPON to see staff's post or see others talk about it to even know about it. Since the beginning of this whole AI boom i had no issue with AI data training as long as it's consentual and ethical, but obviously it most of the time isnt. Tumblr's method of rolling out this change was purposely underhanded. I'm never going to simply be "okay" or normalize in my mind the fact that big tech companies feel entitled to people's privacy- which i believe extends to our online lives. I don't think myself or anyone else should ever feel completely apathetic to the fact that people you don't know, that definitely do not need it, are making money off of you without your consent or knowledge. Just to be clear this isnt about what is and isnt "real art" or whatever for me. It's just a huge distraction from the main point, a big debate that will go absolutely nowhere. What's more important about it is that big techs and billionaires don't have interest in making the world a better place, they only care about eliminating our "distractions" that get in the way of them making money and accumulating more wealth. My solution: We need to make them deepthroat shotguns and machetes.

[slaaverin]

I saw you talk about tarot. I honestly don't know how it works but I believe in them. So idk how to ask this but what does the 2025 of Jikook looks like according to you

Anon, it pleases me to hear you are interested in tarot. It is such a wonderful tool to explore the human psyche!

Unfortunately, even if I am a reader myself, I don't personally do readings about BTS.

I feel like with bluemoonpunch's readings and my own observations, I have enough little insights to please my brain lol

But I can offer my 2 cents about 2025.

My prediction, and I feel I can be entirely wrong of course, is that at first, we won't be seeing much of Jimin and Jungkook.

They will need time to get back to their lives, to settle in, and to focus on their own individual projects, as well as group projects. So I don't think we will be seeing a lot of interactions to be honest.

But I think as time progresses, we will be seeing them more in group settings, they will open up more to us, and we will see them interact as they did before.

I'm 100% convinced if they are asked they will not help themselves and babble about their experience in military and probably give us more insights about the behinds of AYS.

I also don't exclude some interactions during lives.

But I don't think this is gonna be very loud at first, at least I don't expect it.

I also expect them to take some physical distance as soon as they get out of MS (which is perfectly normal and healthy) just to take a breather from each other after spending this much time together.

I expect physical distance ok but I also think they will take time for each other both as well later, just to really reconnect in an intimate matter. Whether it will be through AYS or through dinner dates or other types of dates, or simply spending time at each other's house (which we won't necessarely know about) I don't know.

But I think they will need at some point to spend quality time with each other.

I believe when we see them again in group settings, we'll be getting many moments as we always have.

But maybe it will take some time for everything to settle in. It will all depend on their mindset. We will know more about it if they do a "welcome back" live it will be already enough to assess where they are at.

So let's have patience.

Sorry this is not the answer you probably wanted to hear.

If you want to read tarot readings I recommend you bluemoonpunch's readings on tumblr.

Take care anon 💜

[pisceanofinterest]

I've decided not to directly engage with this post (and other posts like it) because I have seen with my own two eyes the way that users like this will absolutely dog pile people for having a different opinion than them... However, I cannot read this and not say something about it.

This post proves how disconnected from reality so many "anti-ableist, pro-AI" users are (yes, this is, unfortunately, becoming an identity group online lol).

As someone with multiple disabilities, I utilize AI -- for example, I use a program that reads books/pdfs/essays aloud to me so I can actually get all of my grad school reading done every week-- however, it is possible for AI to be both a tool to help those with disabilities AND for AI to be harmful to the environment and to artists. I'm no expert on the subject, but I know enough about the environmental costs, and enough about the ways AI is stealing (this user would be so mad I used that word) other people's art to feed it. I also know that AI has been used for decades to help with disabilities. Both of these concepts can exist simultaneously. And, in fact, it's actually a good idea to put these things in conversation.

What is so flawed about this person's post is that they -- like so many people in the world-- do not understand nuance. Everything has to be black or white, "pro" or "anti," and, frankly, it's immature as fuck. There are too many people on the internet trying to make victims of themselves because other people are making VALID AS FUCK criticisms about the ever-expanding use of AI. I'm sorry, but trying to make yourself seem like a crucified victim of a (non-existent) witch-hunt because you're actively denying the harm that AI causes (simply because you cannot conceive of the fact that NUANCE EXISTS) is silly.

This person-- and many other people like them-- are literally trying to create an identity group out of supporting AI. And yes, the foundations of this claim might be because they're disabled or believe themselves to be "anti-ableist" but it's super weird to try to make a minority of yourself because you're mad that people are calling out the ways that the AI programs you use are 1) stealing (because they are) and 2) literally fucking up the environment.

It's giving: "people disagree with my opinion so i'm literally going to martyrize myself so that I seem like I hold the moral high ground when, in fact, I'm incapable of understanding nuance and refuse to have adult conversations about the world."

Please, for the love of god, touch grass. Please try to recognize that, yes, AI can be a useful tool, but also certain kinds of AI are literally causing damage. I'm tired of these lazy, black and white, absolutist arguments that make no sense.

No one is stopping you from using programs that steal artists' work or that harm the environment. Do whatever you want, as you have done. However, that doesn't mean you're not immune to valid criticism for supporting these programs... if you're gonna make supporting generative AI your whole personality (or your blog's whole personality), be prepared to face criticism for it. But I'm also getting the vibe that you WANT people to call you out so you can make little posts like this and further "prove" you're a victim... lol

[lucidoctober]

i think we all just need to understand that, morality and intellectual property aside, the real true bad thing about ai art is that it is simply low effort. the reason a student handing in an essay written by chat gpt is bad is because it’s low effort. it shows the teacher that the student did not care about the assignment. big budget movie studios using ai in their movies is insulting to the audience because they know it is low effort. the audience expects better.

there are other evils of ai that need to be discussed, such as the extreme ease of the spread of misinformation and the way that it has tainted so many corners of the net so quickly. but ultimately, it is just a tool that makes things easier. and easier, the VAST majority of the time, is not necessarily better. this is why hand made clothing still lasts longer than clothing made by machines.

but i still enjoy the occasional fast fashion product. i just do so knowing that it was produced by slave labor and is probably going to end up in a land fill. and people who use ai need to understand that they do so knowing the consequences of using something that has great potential for evil and should do what they can to mitigate this, such as only using the work of consenting artists and not using ai to spread misinformation. which i see a lot of people doing.

ultimately we have to accept that this is the future. this is what the art world looks like now. it is too late to go back. i believe there are ethical ways to do ai art. i believe there are unethical ways. i believe both are going to continue to exist. i believe the culture in the art community is going to change drastically and become almost unrecognizable over the course of the next couple of years. i think we all need to stop whining about how things used to be done and start figuring out how to make the future a place where we can all at least try to get along rather than just sticking our heads in the sand about this.

thank you for listening, and please only add if you have anything in good faith to say.