#Hiroshima Nagasaki
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
creativemedianews · 1 month ago
Text
Japanese atomic bomb survivors receive Nobel Peace Prize
Japanese atomic bomb survivors receive Nobel Peace Prize #hibakushasurvivors #Hiroshimabombing #HiroshimaNagasaki
0 notes
vath-and-such-vinluv-s-stuff · 10 months ago
Text
youtube
the annoying fat man
0 notes
theconcealedweapon · 2 months ago
Text
Americans: "I don't understand how people could possibly be cruel enough to believe that 9/11 was justified. Only a monster could believe that."
Americans: "Nuking Japan was justified."
2K notes · View notes
denimbex1986 · 1 year ago
Text
'...What Nolan shows us
I just finished reading Justin Chang’s excellent interpretation of what Christopher Nolan tried to show or not show in his brilliant movie “Oppenheimer” [“‘Oppenheimer’ doesn’t show us Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That’s an act of rigor, not erasure,” Aug. 14]. The interpretation he offers is excellent, but I am writing to you in response to his final paragraph. So many times, film directors underestimate the intelligence of audiences. Nolan makes intelligent films and trusts his audiences to think for themselves. I thank Nolan for doing that, and I thank Mr. Chang for pointing out that he does.
Horace Morana San Luis Obispo
The criticism of “Oppenheimer’s” lack of showing the gruesome effects of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is understandable [“Critics object to film’s victim erasure,” Aug. 7]. However, unless one has not read John Hersey’s “Hiroshima” or Robert Jay Lifton’s “Death in Life: Survivors of Hiroshima,” or watched the countless documentaries and movies about the bombings, you know what happened. To fault director Nolan for not showing the effects misses the point about the viewpoint of Oppenheimer.
Historian Paul Ham is probably right that the film “cannot help but be morally half-formed,” and his excellent book, “Hiroshima Nagasaki,” is convincing in that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war, but no feature film is likely to capture the full impact of the bomb’s history and effects. I hope that most “Oppenheimer” viewers will at least remember Nolan’s final point that nuclear war is still possible and that there must be an abolition of nuclear weapons to avoid more Hiroshimas and Nagasakis.
Bob Ladendorf Los Angeles...'
0 notes
trans-rights-coastalmangoes · 2 months ago
Text
just finished trigun maximum. can't believe they expect me to just continue on with my day like nothing happened
332 notes · View notes
komsomolka · 3 months ago
Text
South Africa's anti-imperialist President Nelson Mandela speaks up that the US dropped bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to threaten the Soviet Union, which had emerged victorious from the fight against fascism.
245 notes · View notes
enbycrip · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
If you’re not aware, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were deliberately not bombed with the firebombs that destroyed most of Tokyo and other Japanese cities in 1945 because they were two of a number of cities deliberately selected as locations for atomic bombings.
They wanted a “pristine” test of their new weapon on a previously undamaged city.
The US knew those cities were full of civilian refugees when they bombed them. They had herded them there.
Parallels, huh?
1K notes · View notes
i-am-aprl · 6 months ago
Text
A US SITTING Senator Lindsey Graham is openly advocating for Gaza to be nuked on national television. War mongers. Genocide mongers.
Source: MSNBC
176 notes · View notes
captain-price-unofficially · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Hiroshima after the explosion, August 1945
123 notes · View notes
sarahalainn · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
8月6日 広島 🕊️
Lest we forget, 6th August Hiroshima
#HiroshimaDay
8月9日 長崎🕊️
Lest we forget, 9th August Nagasaki
#NagasakiDay
… and yet the world keeps forgetting
Tumblr media
一本の鉛筆が、あれば 
「戦争は嫌だ」と、私は書く
youtube
Tumblr media
61 notes · View notes
whereserpentswalk · 1 year ago
Text
Idk if this is a hot take or not but I feel the need to stress: no discussion about the bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki has any reason to mention Japanese war crimes. Literally nothing a government does justifies killing random people who happen to live in that government's territory. It is genocidal rhetoric to act as if a group of people can do something that justifes killing massive amounts of them.
There is an idea in western culture that we can judge warcrimes based on how "good" of a group were the victims. This dates back to the conquest of the Aztec empire, where things that horrified Europeans at the time where justified by bringing up terrible things done by the Aztec government. People defend the Spanish empire on those grounds today. It's so pervasive that it'll even come up when people are talking agaisnt genocides (they'll bring up native groups being peaceful as the reason why westward expansion was bad, as if them being human wasn't enough).
Would Russia be justified in nuking the US because the US government committed warcrimes in the middle east? (Actually speaking of Russia, you'll see this rhetoric when tankies bring up Ukraine's nazi problem.) Because if not, and you think hiroshima and nagasaki were justified, then you have to give a reason other then the fact that you judge the lives of westerners and nonwesterners differently.
If someone brings up crimes a group committed, real or imaginary, when arguing about atrocities committed agaisnt them, they've already told you that they don't believe people of that group have rights, that they believe anything can be done to them if it's justified.
There is no crime someone can commit, that's so bad that it justifies killing a stranger who happens to speak the same language as them.
230 notes · View notes
humanoidhistory · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
"First picture of results of atomic bomb." From the front page for the Gainesville Daily Register, Texas, August 13, 1945.
336 notes · View notes
fuckyeahmarxismleninism · 26 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Nobel Peace Prize winner: Gaza like Japan after U.S. atomic bombs
By Gary Wilson
Toshiyuki Mimaki, co-chair of Nihon Hidankyo, the Japanese organization honored with the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize for its anti-nuclear activism, drew comparisons between the plight of children in Gaza and those impacted by the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
“In Gaza, bleeding children are being held (by their parents). It’s like Japan 80 years ago,” Mimaki said at a news conference in Tokyo. “Children in Hiroshima and Nagasaki lost their fathers in the war and their mothers in the bombings. They became orphans.”
31 notes · View notes
icedsodapop · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Literally! 226,000 civillians died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and as of 2022, 118,935 hibakusha (explosion-affected people) are still alive today. The hibakusha are still being discriminated today when in comes to marriage and work prospects. But sure Chris, let's makes another film centering the dude who spearheaded the fucking project that created the hibakusha 😒🤷🏻‍♀️
200 notes · View notes
mysharona1987 · 9 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
From the Washington Post.
Oh, Israel learned everything it knows from the US.
Also, Dr Bresser is a very terrible doctor. I thought doctors were meant to save people?
“Nah, let’s just starve one million children to death.”
94 notes · View notes
safije · 7 months ago
Text
People defend dropping the atomik bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by saying Japan committed war crimes in Nanjing or elsewhere, making it sound like the US did it in the name of justice for Koreans and Chinese, but then you learn afterwards the US pardoned the Japanese scientists who tortured and experimented on Chinese civilians in exchange for data. America did not care about civilians in East Asia, if they did they would've punished the war criminals instead of punishing all the civilians (including Koreans) that were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
41 notes · View notes