#GOD this made me so mad

[biblicalhorror]

That ex-friend of mine who told me I was sheltered for saying she shouldn't date an antivaxxer is posting on her meme page about "cishet couples" being posted on bi visibility day being "biphobic" right after I made an anniversary post with Alex because our anniversary happens to be on bi visibility day. Lol. Lmao even

[turtletoria]

the krampus incident from the book of bill if it was out of character and stupid

[chaikachi]

"Look, whatever you're thinking... do me a favour. Don't let me go."

rosegarden transistor au because them being separated in canon isn't enough. i need to make them yearn in alternate universes too, apparently.

[lightbulb-warning]

today i offer you prompts 11-20 for isat month!! ignore your calendar THANKYUUUU <3

[lesbianwyllravengard]

Yeah I saw that post, it’s actually what I was referencing here. They turned off reblogs because they’re a fucking coward. And dead wrong.

Markus’s painting, Identity -> Prisoner, is perhaps the MOST obvious clue that not only Markus is fucking enslaved, just like the other androids, and that Carl is his enslaver, but he knows it. Even before deviating, he knew. Just because Carl is nice doesn’t mean shit. Markus’s existence with Carl was always one of captivity, never one of freedom.

Markus painting because Carl told him to isn’t "Carl letting Markus paint because he enjoys it” it’s Carl forcing Markus to paint because Markus has to follow his orders.

Markus reading or tapping a few keys on the piano or playing chess isn’t “Carl being so nice letting Markus do whatever he wants” it’s Carl telling Markus to do something - something from one of the predetermined “allowed” things, such as reading, playing piano, or chess - while Carl eats his breakfast that Markus made for him and literally served on a silver fucking platter. 

Anything that Carl does “for Markus” is just to make himself feel better about owning a slave. So long as Carl owns Markus, he cannot be free. Markus was a slave, just like every other android.

can't reblog from op but i saw the post that said "Markus is always like "we're not their slaves anymore" my brother in Christ you were painting, reading philosophy and playing the piano" AND IT ACTUALLY LEFT ME SPEECHLESS??? how do thousands of people play the same game and yet draw the most incorrect, insulting conclusions about the MAIN PROTAGONIST OF SAID GAME. like if you took five seconds to examine markus' supposed "happy life" while living with carl, it would be made abundantly clear that his existence parallels living in a golden cage: pretty from the outside, but a harsh reality within. markus was still owned, he was still considered property, just bc carl was "different" from other android owners in the sense that he ALLOWED (key word) markus to learn how to play piano and paint doesn't mean he was happy or less of a "slave" from other androids. he didn't understand that there was more to gain from life, he didn't know what genuine freedom felt like until he was reborn that night in the junkyard. ALSO IF YOU LOOK AT ANY OF MARKUS' PAINTINGS YOU WOULD INSTANTLY BE PROVEN WRONG??? not one of his artworks support this supposed "carefree, easy" life that op is claiming markus experienced: his paintings are dark, they depict feeling trapped and angry, they're drawn with raw and heavy brushstrokes, his art is meant to convey what he was thinking before discovering deviancy. sure, markus might have had a "healthier than most" upbringing when compared to other androids, but that doesn't diminish or erase the fact that he was seen as nothing more than a possession, forbidden from making his own decisions and belittled when he finally took a justified stance on free will from carl himself. (idk, i really hate when people don't understand the importance and/or the most basic foundations of his entire character so i fear i must be a bitter and defensive markus stan until the end of time)

[lover-of-mine]

[kitamars]

birthdays are just arbitrary days until someone wants chocolate

extra:

[inkclover]

wooooo made some gifts for a secret santa in the server weehoohhhh

note: prismo/scarab/nightmo piece under the cut

server wizards came up with the trouple name - coinflip for these trio… it’s so cute!

[queenlucythevaliant]

Just to clarify my thoughts (since I've had a number of people ask me about it) re: Job and cursing God. There's a big difference between cursing God as used in Scripture and how we generally would think of cursing at God today.

Cursing someone, in the Bible, has a lot of depth to it. It's not just saying "screw you " in anger, it's got a sense of forsakenness to it. It's the opposite of a blessing, a removal of blessing. If the blessing is presence, your face shining on the person you're blessing, then a curse is absence. In some translations, Job's wife tells him to "renounce God and die," which I honestly think makes a lot more sense to modern ears.

Job says a lot of unpleasant things to and about God in his anger and grief. So do the Psalmists. A number of the Prophets. So can we. God can take it if we come to him with honest expressions of our emotion, including those not-so-nice ones directed at him. I don't think there's anything wrong with getting mad at God and saying, "How dare you, you bastard" when you suffer unjustly. You can say much worse, I think, without sinning, though I don't feel particularly inclined to give examples. But as long as it's an honest expression of your heart, I think you're doing exactly what prayer is for. You're presenting him your heart with an open hand. He can use that. Opposite of love is not hate but indifference, etc.

Job doesn't renounce God. Neither should we. But I think when you're truly suffering, you're gonna have those feelings toward God either way. He'd rather you address them with him directly than try to avoid them. Cursing at God in the modern sense is actually a great way to keep the relationship strong and not end up cursing/renouncing him in the Biblical sense.

[crazy-fangirl2524]

I know we say Neil Josten is constantly mischaracterised by the fandom or even himself but you know who is the most mischaracterised in the entire series?

Andrew minyard by all the characters except for Neil, Renee, Bee and Wymack

[fxnharellll]

LEAVE LOGHAIN OUT OF UR BULLSHIT

[aakeysmash]

read the drabble in which college!sukuna gives yuuji his jersey again and asked myself if anyone else gave the same importance as i did to the contrast between “good luck, captain” and the “to the way his ticket never left his pocket, because he never properly asked you to come”.

like, he didn’t even ask her to go to the game, meanwhile she made quesadillas at night for him without asking him, an act he didn’t even notice because he NEVER PROPERLY CARED, and i wasn’t talking about the tickets only!!! did u get it???

[aappleslice]

THEY DON'T KNOW YOU LIKE I DO

[ilovemesomevincentprice]

Vincent Price - Red Skelton Show; Clem vs. Mad Scientist (1956)

[saurongorthaur9]

You know, usually I do not at all support boys hitting girls, but when Isildur gets back to Numenor, he has my full support and permission to clock Earien right in the face. Also Kemen.

[pyrotechnicdarts]

twitter critrole fans love to not know the lore of their own show its their favorite thing