#DEATHOFTHEAUTHOR

[carolynhyde]

Tap on the Synergy of Aithor Group Buy Writing Tool Service It Just Works In the Information Society Today’s marketplace is characterized by an abundance of content. As a result, the possession of certain tools aids in content creation. For authors, marketers, and content builders, access to such tools goes beyond optional, but is a prerequisite. This is where Aithor Group Buy Writing Tool Service comes into play. It isamazing offering that allows buying premium writing tools and in a very pocket friendly manner. This post will analyze the way this service changes the lives of individuals and littler companies and why these changes increase creativity and efficiency and collaboration. Linguix Group Buy- AI writing app The Importance Of Writing Tools Has Increased Significantly In Recent Times Knowing what, writing being content creating activity may not be sufficient to include writing as part of the services rendered. Time is saved and typical tasks are done better. In short, these tools complement the writer’s work by providing assistance in correcting errors, improving language use. The broad acceptance of advanced technologies, especially the Internet, increased the concern for good quality of written content. Whether it is a blog post, an email or social media — good text is necessary to achieve the desired purposes. Such resources serve a useful purpose since they help in the organization and presentation of ideas in such a way that the intended audience receives the intended message. On the internet you can find group buying services such as Aithor that solve this problem: you get all the features of top-of-the-line writing software at a small fraction of its price, thus making them available to everyone. The Concept of Group Buying Explained Group buying is a buzzword these days as it is being used in many fields where people or organizations come together in groups for the purpose of purchasing or ordering goods or services at a cheaper price and such will take advantage of the economies of scale. It is common for the members to club together and buy goods in large quantities which translates to fans enjoying huge discounts making high-end services more accessible. Aithor Group Buy Writing Tool Service is similar in scope as it allows the customer to use a set of writing tools for the cost of one subscription. This not only helps in economizing costs but also promotes integration of users in a focus group of sorts, who share ideas on how to enhance their productivity in writing. Toowriting Mc Editors Group Purchase Buying tools as a group even offers additional revising and estimating the risk of undertaking a new goal more revolved to the economic factor. It is a chance for the users to use the tools and sinking the substantial amount of money in purchasing each of the devices at once. Let Us Take A Look at Aithor’s Diversity of Offers Aithor Group Buy has hundreds of stage tools useful for varied purposes during writing. There are tools to help the writer with grammar checks and plagiarism detection and SEO tools and content creation even more. It should be noted that there are high quality and premium grammar and formatting correction tools that correct errors of style in texts. Such tool typically employs to check writing perfection and stylistic flaws to a great extent. Furthermore, Aithor provides a range of services that help in the planning and creation of content. These inventions can tend to assist writers in generating more topic ideas, organizing their thoughts well, and even coming up with fresh ideas with regularity. By using these tools, individuals can work more efficiently, reduce time consumption and improve efficiency in their work. Benefits of Working on Content that is Co-Developed Collaborative effort is the essence of group purchase services which is also well demonstrated along the lines of Aithor. The site helps users connect writers, marketers, and content developers thereby bringing forth an environment where the users can learn things including tips and providing feedback improving the writing endeavor. Since users are able to share and use ideas, they are freely able to learn from each other’s strategies and experiences. Beyond that, exposure from such interactions affords every writer with vast ideas that improves creativity for the target audiences. Community is established even within the Aithor users whose void is the desire for networking and orientation. Writers are able to meet other practitioners, receive knowledge from eminent people in this profession and even work on assignments with others broadening their minds and contacts as far as writing is concerned. Way of Improving Creativity Using Additional Options. Aithor's writing tools integrate additional options that augment creativity. Such options include upon the basic elements such as morphology and sex of language units, as well as on the content and genre of the text. Writers can get continuous suggestions and evaluations from the AI, acting almost as a co-writer at times. These features give writers new ways to reach out to and hook in their readers, helping them expand their creative limits. Another advantage is the ability to adapt content to specific requirements and tastes. Depending on whether the writer wants to inform, entertain or convince, Aithor's tools enable them to develop content which purpose is more easily achieved. Adapting The Writing Tools to Shorter Timelines In today’s digital world, time is of the essence and Aithor's writing tools have been made with respect to time saving in each step of the writing process. These tools cut down processes, from research & ideation to drafting & editing and give the writer more time to think outside the box rather than worrying about the structure alone. Applications for grammar checking, spell-checking, and style suggestions perform redundant operations on a draft thereby saving time on revisions making sure the final copies are clean and publication-ready. Such efficiency enables the writers to have the desired qualities for all content produced within the given timeline. In addition, how Aithor works can be integrated because there are used popular platforms also, for instance, WordPress, and Google Docs, making the workflow better inside the company. People are able to move from one utility to other and one platform to other without breaking the flow of work and artistic creation. SEO Relevance in Content Creation Optimizing content for search engines is key to engaging more audiences and giving visibility to more people any content posted, be it, text, or written images. Features of Aithor’s writing tools allow SEO to be adhered to even while writing thereby enhancing the web traffic of the content. Aithor provides suggestions for keywords, meta tags, and checks on the level of audience friendliness of the content creating a two way designing of content for readers and surging the demand for the content t by being favored in search engines. Making the content appealing to the readers and meeting the technical needs of being found online through searches is guaranteed. It is vital for anyone seeking to make a mark in the online media to appreciate and undertake implementing SEO. Aithor assists in facilitating this goal so that writers attention grabbing possible search engine items can be created. Crafting Content that Grabs Attention Creating persuasive content is an art, and Aithor comes fully equipped to help you in this regard. Protecting and clarifying relationships that enhance storytelling, the structure of the content creates engagement, and as a result, the content created meets the communication needs of the people. The platform also provides writing assistants to help the users understand how to organize a plot in such a way that a reader stays interested in the events from the first to the last page. For instance, narrators can be advised on key aspects such as pacing, voice or character development because they are the tools that Aithor gives the writer to help the writer’s storytelling. Aithor is user friendly in terms of audiences’ engagement as they offer features that measure audience engagement as well as their feedback with tools to achieve that. This information is beneficial to the writers in order to redirect and improve their content strategy so that every content is not just about how many people it reaches to but also how many people it speaks to. Developing a Viable Writing Model Sustainability when creating content is maintained on quality versus quantity terms, Aithors tools are able to help the writers achieve this benchmark. By helping them achieve productivity in creating content, reaching their audience creatively and collaborating with others, the platform allows the writers to sustain creative writing over time. Writers can create content plans that include their goals and available resources to help them deliver quality content and avoid fatigue. The planning and organizing and carrying out of Aithor's features makes it easy to have a continuous supply of interesting content. The marketplace trends as well as audience interests are curbed them to remain writers’ due to the availability of such platforms. Such mobility is also important to make up for the productivity in the fast changing age of digital. Moving Forward with Aithor The Aithor Group Buy Writing Tool Service supports the low tier users and sits at the top in terms of reliability performance, services and author biographic management and professional assignment help. Be it a well-established content writer or the one in the growing stage of the content writing almost every one can get the services of Aithor. For people who want to develop advanced ideas in their sensitive areas, there is no barrier as Aithor is free during a trial period where as a client, you appreciate how the tool operates. The opportunity to enjoy such a provision is what has made Aithor high user ratings in making and advanced wishes to the writers. To sum, Aithor Group Buy Writing Tool Service stands for great strides in collaborative writing and economical content sheath. Aithor helps his writers progress in the new world by making such tools available and creating a supportive community around the writers themselves.

[antoniab93-blog]

The 'death of the author' concept

Occasionally with this blog, I just cover topics that have been on mind & this is something we discuss on my podcast a lot, about how much you can separate an author from their books. So what does Death of the Author mean by the original definition?

For those who don’t run in the booktok, bookstagram, book tube online sphere, these days we are very quick to cancel an author based on their actions (and rightly so in most cases!). And for some, once an author has done something to end up on the shit list, it means they no longer want to engage with any of that authors work, even if there is a lot of sentimentality attached to it (I.e She Who…

[tellmeallaboutit]

I think that's an extremely important thing to say, and there's never been such a thing as a true reading of any work of fiction, even if there is only one canonical source, and the never would be. Death of the author, you know the drill. You may have a knee-jerk reaction to having other interpretations of the characters, ESPECIALLY when they come from the 'canon' source, but it's really important to internalise that there is no right or wrong reading in art. Whatever resonates with you, do it, and make it valid in your own little world.

For example, if the Raphael romance were to be implemented (I don't think so, but theoretically), a lot of fanon readings of the Raphael/Tav romance would come crashing down and feel invalidated (or reinforced and made somehow more 'true'). But no, that's just not the case. It made sense in the eyes of the beholder -> was made true in this particular instance. I really love that our little corner of fandom doesn't even get into the whole bottom/bottom/bad in bed discussion except in jest - because ultimately it doesn't matter to our interpretations at all. Canon is a source of inspiration, a guideline, if you want, from there on, it's free game.

given everything, i think we as a fandom need to really internalize that – even for those of us who prefer characterization derived from canon as much as possible – there is, at this point, increasingly no such thing as one true characterization. this is true even outside of discussions of personal read of a character. in this case, i am referring solely to the effect of the changes and edits larian has made, and continues to make, that affect characterization.

given the frankly somewhat unprecedented effect of these continuing changes and tweaks of characterization, it also raises the question of what counts as “canon”. and, at least in my personal determination, the answer is nothing so simple as it is in the case of many other mediums and source materials.

canon for each individual is going to mean something different — not just in the sense of their own canon playthrough, but also the version of the “canon” characters they experienced based on when they played the game.

as an example of this: my formative experience of halsin – my favorite character – was almost entirely prior to patch 5, a patch that made some fairly significant changes to his characterization. i do not personally feel myself required to change the character i love just because the game did after its full release. therefore, in most cases, when i am talking about and considering the character, it is in his pre-patch 5 iteration.

i’m sure there are others in similar positions, whether with the same character or other characters, and so it feels increasingly necessary to open these discussions.

[sistahscifi]

Congratulations, Nnedi!!!

Sistah Scifi Siblings, are you reading Death of the Author?

Credit to @nnediokorafor I’m featured in the New York Times, 🥹. You can find the story with a quick Google of “nnedi and New York Times”.

I love that the Binti pin on my coat made it into the photo. This photo was taken at Navy Pier in Chicago, not far from the Lake Point Tower (both places are *very* significant to the main character of DEATH OF THE AUTHOR).

#deathoftheauthor🤖

#rustedrobots

#nnediokorafor

#bintitrilogy

#SistahScifi

@harpercollins

@williammorrowbooks

@nytimes-article

[pebblysand]

hi pal, how r ye? weird ask ik but thoughts on bisexual!harry?

hello! not weird at all - a very valid question.

that said, i always feel a bit odd when people ask me for opinions about characters/canon events though, because i feel like there's always this expectation that i have a Strong Headcanon about these things, which honestly i mostly don't. i'm pretty neutral on most characters - like: yes, i have my view of them, but if someone has a different view, i'm not going to fight them, you know? i tend to bow out of conversations every time people start drilling into metas and text interpretations, because i find that everyone just seems to have much stronger thoughts than me about most things. i think there's a million ways to interpret canon, and i don't think my way is the only valid interpretation. i really don't feel that strongly about anything 🤣.

that said, from a writing/fic perspective: i guess i feel... neutral about it? i've said this before but i'll say it again: i think really good writing can sell me anything. it could sell me harry as a pirate, harry as a serial killer, harry as a god, if it wanted to, so i don't have any strong objections to anything. i'll read slash fics or fics with harry being bisexual if they're well-written. i suppose the one ship i really don't see is tomharry/harrymort - that seems very far-fetched to me, but again, i think a really good fic could potentially even sell that to me, if the characterisation work was done well.

having said that, i personally wouldn't write bisexual!harry because personally, in my own view of the text, i just don't see it, so it would be hard for me to sell it to other people. i know a lot of people will point to him calling men "handsome" all the time and label that as "basically canon", and if that's your boat, then by all means float it, but i personally think this is just JKR being a straight woman and describing people the way she sees them. also, calling someone of the same sex "handsome" doesn't make you bisexual/gay - i find women pretty all the time, but i identify as (mostly) straight, so. i think if you put a gun to my head and asked me: is "bisexual!harry canon?" i would say "no," because JKR clearly meant him as straight, and interpreting the text any differently is reaching. I appreciate that a lot of people are very #deathoftheauthor with JKR, but i am not.

that said, if you asked me: is is canon-compliant? sure, you can make a lot of things canon-compliant if you want to. you just have to build more on top of canon. there is nothing in canon that says: harry will never be attracted to a man ever, and as such, you can for sure make bisexuality canon-compliant. you just have to work on it and sell it. and, if you want to tell me that's your canon, then fine, why not? it's your interpretation and it's just as valid as mine or JKR's.

i think the way i view these things is more like: how big of a writing hurdle is it to make me believe them? so, for instance, if you were to write a hinny fic, my tolerance for mediocre writing is higher, because i already believe in that relationship. if you were to write a dramione, harmony, drarry or harry/ron fic, your writing hurdle might be a little bit higher, but i do generally think all of these relationships are within the realm of possibilities, and therefore i'll buy it if it's decently written. if you were to write harrymort or snarry, i'm like: mate, that's a Hard Sell, but sure look it, if you think you can pull it off, be my guest.

that's as far as shipping harry with canon male characters goes, though. if we're talking in the abstract, could harry be with another man? i think ... yeah. like, why not? i genuinely don't believe anyone is 100% gay or straight, i think we all sort of float somewhere on that spectrum, so maybe he could potentially meet someone he likes. again, it's probably not what JKR intended, but you can make it canon-compliant. i think it's unlikely, because i think he's probably like 90% straight, but that 10% is open. there's just other canon characters who i think are more likely to be bisexual than he is.

i also think that it's important to acknowledge that it's understandable and important that people write harry as bisexual. like, i totally understand why someone would do that. it's representativity, and openness, etc. but i also don't think changing the canon sexual orientation of canon characters (as in: giving them a different sexual orientation than the one JKR intended) is the only way that can be achieved. HP obviously lacks representativity in that area (esp in light of today's standards) but i tend to focus my diversity writing on OCs, and that's just my way to do it.

additionally, if i want to do something with canon characters, i tend to focus on the sexual orientation of characters who are a bit secondary, whose head you're not in, and for whom, thus, sexual orientation is a bit more of an open question. i think you can easily do that with ginny (in fact one of my favourite fics i've read in recent years in ginny/luna) or with people like seamus or dean, who are in the background enough that you just don't know what they think/who they're attracted to.

but again, i'm a canon-compliant writer. i'm a canon-compliant reader. if you're writing this wild AU where you're totally disregarding the canon characters and settings and just writing whatever you please, then obviously that's a different question.

[comfortandadam]

Did this commission for a friend of ours of his family in the #Potterverse. As fraught as that whole scene is these days, it's still a fun fiction to imagine in! #deathoftheauthor #inaliterarysense #notliterallythatsterrible https://www.instagram.com/p/CFurZrfhFDI/?igshid=18v145bbx6xl0

[danielvandernoon]

Socrates-Sized Irony 🪨 “You know, Phædrus, that is the strange thing about writing, which makes it truly correspond to painting. The painter’s products stand before us as though they were alive. But if you question them, they maintain a most majestic silence. It is the same with written words. They seem to talk to you as though they were intelligent, but if you ask them anything about what they say from a desire to be instructed they go on telling just the same thing forever." Socrates / Phædrus Dialogue approx. 370BCE #ancienne #ancient #writingtool #tech #writingtech #script #workofiction #calligraphy #natural #linearb #cursive #deathoftheauthor #athenian #socrates #greek #fictional #narrative #metaphor #emojifree #indianink #brushwork #imagefree https://www.instagram.com/p/Ckta2_ys1bl/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[marcain86]

More found poetry like gifts from the Gods. A more apt line I could not find. #artist #art #poetry #text #font #deathoftheauthor #rizomas (at Carbondale, Illinois)

[intermountainexile]

On the #gif pronunciation controversy. #unpopularopinion #literarytheory #rolandbarthes #deathoftheauthor #amwriting #writingcommunity #writingideas #writing (at San Francisco, California) https://www.instagram.com/p/BuW9VrKhsXi/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=11q2inw2136k3

[farawayeyes4]

Death of the Author

Re-read for annotation purposes the essay by Roland Barthes, “The Death of the Author” for my authorship chapter and research. 

Barthes wrote the groundbreaking and fundamental essay “The Death of the Author” in 1967/68. This piece asks us to set aside the notion that a text must have an author. Rather, Barthes asks us to question who it is that speaks. He starts his essay quoting Balzac, pointing out that the sentence in question most likely is spoken by a woman when the author, Balzac, is a man. Should this mean that he is the speaker even though this is clearly his character speaking instead? Barthes cites that authorship rose with the rise of the printing press and the Reformation. He remarks that literary criticism is often tangled in the web of authorship, as both authorship and criticism often go hand in hand. The main thrust of the argument Barthes makes is that for the reader to be able to interpret the text, the author must die or be dismissed as the center of its framework or meaning. Language is to be the key performer and indicator for the text and how a reader should engage with it. Barthes remarks that the all texts are a “tissue of citations, resulting from the thousand sources of culture,” which means that perhaps not only is an author someone who culture perceives as a creator, but in actuality is a scavenger who poaches for to put their own texts together. Barthes wants readers to reclaim texts for themselves, forgetting the author. In many ways, this may be impossible to do in the current climate. Literary theory may stretch itself to encompass this concept, but copyright and property right law will never do so. This means that Barthes and his theory may never actually reach true fruition, that authorship and text will forever remain linked rather than separated and weighed on their own merits.

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Image, Music, Text, translated by Stephen Heath, Hill and Wang, 1977, pp. 142–48.

[hella1975]

hella what should i change my url to??

ahurulives-deathoftheauthor

[arikeia]

It's ridiculous that people still call LWJ and WWX moral ideals when the context of that quote was a romantic context. We all know MXTX loves to talk about how sexy and charming her boys are and this was just that. She sees them as good partners and has never said they we ethically perfect people. But even their viability as boyfriends is debatable #deathoftheauthor

[grocerystoredean]

yr blog tastes like really good salmon and the pish-tahh of a can being opened and lake water perfume and crumbles of sweet drywall (smells like books) not in an eating glass way but in a deathoftheauthor remodeling of the bodyhousejacket way

remodeling of the bodyhousejacket entering my brain immediately and sitting itself down on the couch

[sistahscifi]

Congratulations, Nnedi!!!

Sistah Scifi Siblings, are you reading Death of the Author?

Credit to @nnediokorafor I’m featured in the New York Times, 🥹. You can find the story with a quick Google of “nnedi and New York Times”.

I love that the Binti pin on my coat made it into the photo. This photo was taken at Navy Pier in Chicago, not far from the Lake Point Tower (both places are *very* significant to the main character of DEATH OF THE AUTHOR).

#deathoftheauthor🤖

#rustedrobots

#nnediokorafor

#bintitrilogy

#SistahScifi

@harpercollins

@williammorrowbooks

@nytimes-article

[letterfromajax]

Me: lol Harry Potter fan

Harry Potter fan: I don’t support JKR! I DONT! I separate work from the author #deathoftheauthor xoxo trans rights,,yes I know she’s racist and also using her platform to be the real life professor umbrella BUT death of the author also I don’t give her money so that makes it okay bc it’s my comfort series I grew up with it so don’t worry I’m critical TM of it and it’s okay I’m a cool person

[mercerspoems]

Flogging a Dead Worker

Flogging a Dead Worker - #New #Poem #Poetry #Death #Work #Bones #Mortality #Morbidity #FigureitOut #DeathofTheAuthor

Dance of Death (Credit: Wellcome Collection gallery (2018-03-28): https://wellcomecollection.org/works/g3en2wwn CC-BY-4.0) Come sunbleached bones, Don’t envy me. My frame’s the same as yours. Your femurs creak, and fractured now. Mine live and fed with meat, of course. Come wincing skull, Don’t look so glum. Though your dome, empty, clatters. All the while mine’s full besides, of science, sense,…