#Civil and Criminal Court Cases

[copperbadge]

I think there are some court cases or situations in which the jury should be allowed to heckle the attorneys. If not verbally, we should at least be provided with popcorn and allowed to throw it.

[lord-squiggletits]

"How come Orion was okay with Bee cutting people in half but not Megatron killing Sentinel"

Well you see there's a difference between killing someone in combat when they're actively trying to kill you back (self-defense) versus killing someone who's been physically disabled, can no longer fight, and is actively surrendering and trying to run away, hope that helps

[keyboard-cowgirl]

True justice is:

Supporting Victims (community involvement, professional help, financial assistance)

Crime Prevention

Public Education

Rehabilitation

True justice is not:

Punishing Offenders

In this essay, I will

[lawandlegal]

Advocate Narender Singh: A Legacy of Excellence

Advocate Narender Singh

Advocate Narender Singh stands out as India’s top Supreme Court lawyer. Lawyer for Supreme Court of India with decades of experience, he has built a reputation for excellence and dedication.

Legal advice and strategy formulation

Representation in court

Drafting legal documents

Negotiation and settlement

Expertise in Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law Specialist Advocate Narender Singh excels in constitutional law. His deep understanding of the Indian Constitution helps him navigate complex legal issues.

Landmark Cases and Achievements

Significant Legal Milestones Over the years, Advocate Narender Singh has handled numerous landmark cases. His expertise has led to groundbreaking decisions in the Supreme Court.

Commitment to Justice

Dedication to Upholding Justice Advocate Narender Singh’s commitment to justice is unwavering. He ensures that every client receives fair and just representation.

Client-Centered Approach

Prioritizing Client Needs Advocate Narender Singh prioritizes his clients’ needs. His personalized approach ensures that each case is handled with the utmost care and attention.

Recognized for Excellence

Award-Winning Advocate Advocate Narender Singh has received multiple awards for his contributions to the legal field. His recognition as India’s top Supreme Court lawyer is well-deserved.

Advocacy for Human Rights

Champion of Human Rights Advocate Narender Singh is a staunch advocate for human rights. He fights tirelessly to protect the rights and freedoms of individuals.

Legal Expertise Across Diverse Fields

Versatile Legal Knowledge In addition to constitutional law, Advocate Narender Singh possesses expertise in various legal fields. His versatility makes him a formidable advocate in the Supreme Court.

Conclusion

India’s Foremost Supreme Court Advocate Advocate Narender Singh Best Criminal Lawyer for supreme court of India exceptional legal skills and dedication to justice make him India’s №1 advocate for the Supreme Court. His legacy of excellence continues to inspire and set high standards in the legal profession.

Name: Advocate Narender Singh Phone No: 9811338667 Address: Cabin №05, Consultation Room, Ground Floor, C.K Daftary Chamber Block, (Near Gate No.D of Supreme Court of India) New Delhi 110001

[nashwauae]

How to check case status online

This guide unlocks the secrets of checking your case status online, saving you time, frustration, and maybe even a few phone bills. #UAECaseStatus #CheckCaseOnlineUAE #UAEeServices #UAELaw

Stuck in legal limbo, wondering what’s happening with your case in the UAE? Ditch the endless phone calls and embrace the age of instant information! This guide unlocks the secrets of checking your case status online, saving you time, frustration, and maybe even a few phone bills. Ready to take control and gain peace of mind? Buckle up and let’s navigate the user-friendly online systems offered…

[cyphorical]

Trump's Legal Cases

Recent: • Federal Civil Defamation Suit (II) Liable $83,300,000 • NY Civil Trump v. NYTimes/Reporters/Mary Trump Trump to pay $392,638.69 • Federal Civil Defamation Suit (I) Liable $5 million Upcoming: 1. NY AG Civil Fraud Suit Liable - February Sentencing? 2. Federal January 6th Case March 4th, 2024? 3. Manhattan DA Hush Money Case March 25th, 2024? 4. Federal Classified Documents Case May 20th, 2024? 5. Georgia RICO Case August 5th, 2024, Proposed 6. DC Civil Wrongful Death Suit - Pending? 7. NY Civil Copyright Infringement [Eddy] Grant v. Trump - Pending? 8. Federal Civil ACN Video Phone Suit Dismissed - Venue shifted to state courts

Ballot disqualification issue: • Colorado - Disqualified - SCOTUS appeal pending? • Maine - Disqualified - Challenges pending? • Minnesota - Allowed on primary • Michigan - Allowed on primary • Illinois - Allowed on primary

[artanogon]

I hope the situation with your roommate can be fixed or that you can at least somebody else nicer to stay with🫂

thanks anon! i am fighting the university system with a fucking bat to get permanent ptsd accommodations to live on my own so this doesn’t happen again. it’s escalated into a total fucking disaster and while i’m in a better place now with therapy and emotional regulation, i’m moving in with him again in a couple of days because accommodations haven’t gone through, and he tried to start a fight with me tonight. not sure i’m safe going back tbh if things escalate because he can have serious anger issues. but well i was nearly a lawyer and was ALSO a child delinquent. so if he tries some shit i wish him fucking luck

[aslegaladvisors]

https://justpaste.it/b9x1d

[gwmac]

The Murder of Jonathan Lewis: Echoes of Injustice and the Double Standard in Media

The Incident: A Detailed Account of a Senseless Tragedy On the afternoon of November 1, a seemingly mundane dispute tragically escalated in an alley near Rancho High School in Las Vegas. Jonathan Lewis, a 17-year-old student, was violently assaulted by a group of his peers, leading to a heartbreaking outcome. The Spark of the Conflict The confrontation began over a pair of stolen wireless…

[abbaslakhakc]

Both civil and court cases include a plaintiff Asset Forfeiture and a defendant. practicing at the Criminal Bar with a wealth of experience in a wide variety of cases.

[garudabluffs]

Today, Israel’s parliament passed a law that increases the power of the country’s right wing, headed by prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel does not have a written constitution,

670 Comments

And HOW can Israel have NO CONSTITUTION? What have I missed?

LIKE (10)REPLY (3)

Leslie DR10 hr ago

The Declaration of State includes an entire paragraph about creating a constitution. Because six countries declared war on Israel immediately after the State was announced, there was no time to create, debate, and adopt a constitution. In the intervening 75 years, the Supreme Court has established “Basic Laws” which codify some of what we would consider part of a constituent, guaranteeing basic rights and expectations. This is part of why the judicial “reforms” are so concerning .There is currently a conversation happening in Israel academic and public policy circles to call for a constitutional convention. It may be one way out of the current situation, although I don’t see the current ruling coalition being swift to adopt any recommendations.

[miscellaneous-a]

the newest ep of tall claims court is so funny, especially from xB's pov!

he's like the only person who even somewhat knows how US court works and its the best

doc and mumbo are not american and their native country's judicial systems are different enough from the US that they would probably flounder even if it wasnt incomprehensible hermit court based only loosely on the US system

c!bdubs and c!scar are both such goofy and oblivious caricatures, so they don't really know how court works (or its just funnier if they dont)

and meanwhile xB is sitting there like "um actually this is a civil case not a criminal one and thus a whole section of defense's argument and their main witness is completely irrelevant and inadmissible"

but ofc since this is silly anything goes tall claims court, his protests go unnoticed lol

(plus doc's reaction to the verdict/punishment is so funny you have to watch at least one pov just for that)

[snailinthefield]

Rodger x Glisten fusion

Lorgnette the monocle (original/real name Twinkle)

A successful attorney, who prefers working with cases that involve celebrities, "but others will do just fine". Mostly specialises in interpersonal civil cases like family disputes and entertainment industry/law, but claims to be "polished in every kind of law", sometimes even working on criminal cases.

Goes out of his way to gain publicity and reputation, which is the main reason why he desperately tries to work with celebrities as often as possible, and for now his plan seems to be working just as intended. At least he tries to claim that it is.

Works under a pseudonym because he believes his name would prevent other people from talking him seriously.

Being taken seriously is essential for him, which is why "this so called internet sleuth" Veeger annoys him so much. Mostly by being so casual with "undermining importance of the Court Process and spreading misinformation", and criticism from Lorgnette often leads to even more "undermining", speculation and maybe even a little bit of trolling.

[emmedoesntdomath]

we are too close to election day to be having these debates, so- a recap of the most asked questions in this race.

did harris do monumentally good things as vp? no, of course not. vps have very little power in real change. did trump do monumentally good things as president? debatable. better question. did trump do things so monumentally good that they outweighed the harm he did? no.

is harris cringey? does she make you roll your eyes? likely. is donald trump in any state to be president, now or eight years ago? absolutely not.

will harris totally fix the economy? maybe. probably not. will trump totally fix the economy? maybe. probably not. and yet, one of their economic plans is backed by 23 different nobel prize winners. hint- it’s not donald trump’s.

did harris really send thousands of black men to jail in her time as a prosecutor? no. the number was an overexaggeration promoted by right-wing media. was trump really convicted of 34 criminal charges? yes, with another 54 possible charges spanning in three different civil and criminal, state and federal cases looming on the horizon.

will harris fully return the rights overturned in roe v. wade? not likely. she can’t totally overrule the supreme court like that. will trump? no. in fact, he will just make things worse, and make no attempts to prevent the worst of the bans, or the resulting deaths.

is harris a spectacular public speaker? not really. is trump? not a day in his life. yes, the media doctors videos and speeches from both of them. there is still a clearly better speaker.

is tim walz truly god’s gift to america? considering that he’s a politician, doubtful. is jd vance better? nope.

will harris properly disavow israel? no, probably not. she will simply call for a ceasefire. if you think donald trump will do anything but supply israel with more arms power, you’re kidding yourself. it will be a switch from complacent to genocide to allying with it. no matter how bad you think it is already, I promise it will get worse.

harris is not perfect. not by a long shot. but here’s the thing- if she wins, you can vote her out in another four years. if trump does, you may not get the chance. now is not the time to be a moderate, or bipartisan. it is a wonderful sentiment, truly, but if we do not all vote together you will not get the opportunity again. vote for your friends. vote for your family. vote for your children. vote for the people who never got the chance, who never will. if some of us go down, we all do.

[mariacallous]

At noon ET on Monday, the US presidency changed hands, and one of the largest governments in the world rearranged itself in service to the petulance and vulgarity of the nation’s new president.

At the Pentagon, a portrait of a general who Donald Trump had found insufficiently deferential to him in his first term was removed from a wall; photographs of the empty spot circulated on social media. Trump was set to sign a bevvy of executive orders, pledging to withdraw the US from the Paris climate agreement, to revoke policies promoting wind energy and electric cars, and to exert executive powers to speed up the construction of oil pipelines.

He was scheduled to revoke federal acknowledgement of transgender identity for the purposes of civil rights law, declaring in his inaugural address that “there are only two genders”. And Reproductiverights.gov, a federal web site aimed at helping women navigate abortion access, immediately went offline.

CBPOne, an app used by migrants to the US to manage their interactions with immigration officials, went dark when Trump was sworn in. An announcement posted on the programs website said that all existing appointments had been cancelled, leaving tens of thousands of people in the lurch. The press has reported that the new administration plans a series of high-profile raids in major cities this week, in search of immigrants to deport.

Latino businessowners in Chicago reported lost revenue as their clientele stayed home out of fear; a friend from college, a New York City public high school teacher, shared the instructions from her school administrators on how to protect her students in the event of an Ice raid. Meanwhile, Trump’s aides said he would issue an order ending birthright citizenship for the US-born children of immigrants, a move that would create a class of hundreds of thousands of un-Americans and move the concept of US citizenship from a legally protected status to something more akin to an inherited one.

It is not clear what authority, exactly, Trump has to do this; birthright citizenship, after all, is enshrined in the United States constitution. Like much of the inauguration’s declarations, the statements may be for show – grand pronouncements that will be muddled and eroded by the reality of policymaking, the grind of bureaucracy, the whittling-down of lawsuits.

Stephen Miller, the longtime Trump adviser and anti-immigrant crusader, has planned, according to the New York Times, a sort of shock-and-awe approach, hoping to issue as many executive orders and pursue as many maximalist policy changes as possible within the first days of the administration, hoping to terrify and exhaust the opposition. As is always the case with Trump, his statements are much grander than his actions. That doesn’t mean that his actions will not hurt people.

Trump returns to power with more loyal followers and more skittish, deferential and frightened enemies. The Republican party has been reshaped in his image, and so have the courts: just last summer, the US supreme court, including all three of Trump’s first-term nominees, voted to make him virtually immune from criminal prosecution for acts taken in office.

He has pledged to pardon all the convicted January 6 insurrectionists, and to halt prosecutions of those not yet convicted. And he is likely to use his authority over federal law enforcement to pursue civil and criminal proceedings against his enemies. On his way out the door, Joe Biden made a point of pre-emptively pardoning lawmakers who had investigated the January 6 attack, to protect them from Trump’s reprisals. The Democrats are weak, fractured, embittered and scared; the same consultants whose advice lost them the 2024 election are now telling them to defer to Trump, abandon resistance, and shift to the right. So far, many of them appear to be listening. The others are pointing fingers at one another.

Right now the money is on Trump, and the money is substantial. The three richest men in the world – Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg – all sat in the front row at Trump’s inauguration. (His cabinet members were in the second.) The men are there to court lucrative government contracts and discourage regulation of their businesses, but they also appear willing to commit themselves to Trump’s ideological project, especially with regards to gender, and to wield the massive communications platforms that they control to further his culture war agenda.

Bezos has intervened at the Washington Post to tilt the editorial slant in Trump’s favor; Zuckerberg has removed many sex, sexuality and gender protections from the content moderation policies of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads. Musk, meanwhile, is reportedly slated to be given an office in the West Wing, though he has no official government job. Speaking at a rally of Trump supporters held at an arena after the official inauguration ceremony, the billionaire effusively thanked the crowd in his mealy South African accent. Musk then jerked a flat hand from his chest into the air, in a gesture that resembled a Nazi salute.

There is something broken in the soul when such spectacles can no longer shock you. But I confess that they no longer shock me. America is ruled, now, by men who are extremely psychologically transparent: their resentment and greed, their desperate, seeking needfulness, their insecurity and rage at those who provoke it; these things seep off these men, like a stench. They are evil men, and pathetic ones: mentally small, morally ugly. They are relentlessly predictable.

Here is another prediction: these men will not succeed in all their schemes. They will not deport as many people as they say they will; he will not change the law as much as they pledge to; they will not, cannot, capture the institutions as completely, or bury dissent as successfully. They cannot do everything they aim to do. Because politics is not over; because our institutions are not all collapsed; and because the existing institutions are not the only methods of resistance and refusal.

The Trumpist movement that ascended to power on Monday is relying on a tired, defeated America, one too diminished to do anything but submit to their demands and schemes. But the American spirit is indefatigable: it loves freedom and equality, abhors tyranny, values minding your own business and hates, above all, to be told what to do. When Trump was last in office, Americans found, at the end, that they did not like it. They will not like it now, either, and that dislike, however tardy, will have political consequences.