#Carbon audit
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Maximizing Profits and Sustainability: The Long-Term Financial Gains of Regular Carbon Audits
Introduction
In today's business environment, environmental responsibility and sustainability are critical components of corporate strategy. Regular carbon audits are evolving from an ethical imperative to a powerful financial strategy. This blog explores the long-term financial benefits of carbon audits, demonstrating how they contribute to business growth beyond the traditional balance sheet.
Understanding Carbon Audits
Carbon audits, or GHG inventories, measure the total CO2 emissions and other GHGs produced by organizational activities. These audits assess direct emissions from controlled or owned sources, indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam, cooling, and heating, and other emissions related to employee travel, waste disposal, procurement, and the use of products and services.
Financial Advantages of Carbon Audits
Enhanced Investor Appeal and Market Competitiveness
Investors increasingly prioritize companies with strong sustainability practices, associating proactive environmental management with long-term profitability and financial stability. Regular carbon audits demonstrate a commitment to reducing carbon footprints, attracting environmentally conscious investors. This transparency enhances market positioning and competitiveness in sustainability-driven sectors.
Cost Reduction Through Efficiency
Regular carbon audits identify emission sources within company operations, providing a roadmap for targeted improvements. Implementing energy-efficient technologies and reducing resource waste can lead to significant cost savings. Optimizing energy use in manufacturing processes or transitioning to renewable energy sources can substantially lower utility costs.
Risk Management
Climate-related risks, including market, regulatory, and physical risks, pose significant challenges to businesses. Regular carbon audits help companies adapt to new regulations like carbon pricing, environmental compliance standards, and emission trading schemes. Anticipating these challenges allows companies to avoid potential fines, adapt to market shifts towards low-carbon products, and mitigate risks associated with physical changes affecting operations.
Improved Supply Chain Management
Comprehensive carbon audits examine not only direct emissions but also those within supply chains. This scrutiny leads to better supply chain management, encouraging suppliers to adopt green practices and align with overall environmental standards. Sustainable practices improve supplier relationships, enhance supply chain resilience, and reduce costs associated with environmental shocks.
Revenue Opportunities from Carbon Credits
Companies that reduce emissions through effective practices can financially benefit by selling carbon credits in various regulated markets. Audits provide the necessary documentation and verification for participation in these markets, turning carbon efficiency into a revenue-generating asset.
Enhanced Corporate Reputation
Consumers are increasingly selective and informed about the brands they support. Companies known for their environmental stewardship often enjoy brand loyalty, translating into a strong competitive edge and increased sales. Regular audits help build and maintain a reputation as a responsible business.
Conclusion Regular carbon audits are a key element in modern business strategies. Beyond compliance, they unlock cost savings, enhance efficiency, manage risks, and boost corporate reputation, contributing to financial health and competitive advantages. As the global economy increasingly emphasizes sustainability, regular carbon audits will be crucial for businesses aiming to thrive in eco-conscious environments.
0 notes
Text
What is HVAC and how it works?
HVAC, or heating, ventilation, and air conditioning, is a system that is designed to maintain indoor air quality and temperature within a particular building or space. The system comprises several components that work together to ensure optimal heating, cooling, and ventilation. This blog will discuss what HVAC is, its various components, and how it works.
What is HVAC?
HVAC is an acronym that stands for Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. The primary function of the system is to regulate the temperature and air quality within a building or space. HVAC systems are found in a wide range of settings, including residential, commercial, and industrial buildings.
HVAC Components
An HVAC system is made up of several components that work together to achieve its primary function. The main components of an HVAC system include:
1. Furnace or boiler: This is part of the system that provides heating. Furnaces use natural gas, propane, or electricity to generate heat, while boilers use water or steam.
2. Air Conditioner: This component of the system provides cooling. Air conditioners use refrigerant to absorb heat from the indoor air and transfer it outside.
3. Heat Pump: A heat pump is an all-in-one heating and cooling system that transfers heat from one location to another. In the summer, it removes heat from indoor air to cool the space, and in the winter, it pulls heat from outdoor air to warm the space.
4. Ducts: Ducts are channels that transport air throughout the building. They distribute heated or cooled air from the furnace, air conditioner, or heat pump to different rooms.
5. Thermostat: A thermostat is a device that controls the temperature of the HVAC system. It turns the system on and off and regulates the temperature based on the desired settings.
6. Air Handler: The air handler is a component of the HVAC system that regulates the circulation of air. It contains a blower that pushes air through the ducts and filters that remove contaminants from the air.
What is the HVAC Procedure?
HVAC systems work by using the laws of thermodynamics to regulate the temperature and air quality within a space. The laws of thermodynamics state that heat flows from warmer to cooler areas and that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred. HVAC systems use this principle to transfer heat from one location to another and to maintain a constant temperature within the space.
The process of heating and cooling starts with the furnace or air conditioner. In the case of a furnace, natural gas or propane is burned to produce heat. This heat is then transferred to the air handler, where it is distributed through the ducts to the different rooms in the building. In the case of an air conditioner, the refrigerant absorbs heat from the indoor air and transfers it outside, leaving cool air to be distributed through the ducts.
The thermostat is the device that controls the temperature of the HVAC system. It is set to the desired temperature, and when the temperature falls below or rises above that setting, it sends a signal to the furnace, air conditioner, or heat pump to turn on or off. The thermostat also regulates the fan in the air handler, ensuring that the heated or cooled air is distributed evenly throughout the building.
Ducts are the channels that transport heated or cooled air throughout the building. They are usually made of metal or fibreglass and can be rectangular, round, or oval in shape. The ducts are connected to the air handler and distribute air to the different rooms in the building.
The air handler is the component of the HVAC system that regulates the circulation of air. It contains a blower that pushes air through the ducts and filters that remove contaminants from the air. The air handler also contains a heat exchanger, which helps transfer heat from the furnace to the air handler.
Conclusion: The HVAC system is an essential component of modern buildings and homes. It provides comfortable indoor air quality and thermal comfort.
For more information or services contact https://www.appliedenergy.ca/.
#Energy Management#Greenhouse Gas#GHG#Net Zero#Climate Change#Carbon#Carbon Neutral#Paris Climate Change#Energy Audits#Measurement & Verification#Energy Financing#HVAC#LEED#Energy Modelling#GREENHOUSE DESIGN
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Carbon Asset Management Services - Zenith Energy
Zenith Energy carbon asset management involves activities from origination of projects for carbon market till sale of emission units called carbon credits. CAD(Carbon Assets development) is one of the core areas of consulting provided by ZE for over two decades. CAD(Carbon Assets Development) started in the year 2002. At ZE, CAD(Carbon Assets development) involves activities from origination of projects eligible for carbon market till sale of emission reduction units also called carbon credits
Read more: https://zenithenergy.com/carbon-assets-development/
#sustainable energy#green energy solutions#green energy#renewable energy#energy solutions#net zero energy solutions#Net zero energy#esco renewable energy#Energy Audit#Energy Services Company#Carbon Asset Management#zero carbon energy solutions#zero carbon solar
0 notes
Text
Government Policies for a Green Economy: Incentives and Regulations
Green Economy A successful transition to a green economy requires a combination of public and private sector efforts, Green Economy with governments playing a crucial role in setting the framework for this transformation. Policies often target sectors such as energy, transportation, agriculture, waste management, and construction, which are significant contributors to environmental impacts. In this context, incentives and regulations serve as two sides of the policy coin, ensuring both the encouragement of sustainable practices and the enforcement of environmental protection.
One of the main goals of government policies for a green economy is to shift economic activity toward more sustainable practices. This involves reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting renewable energy, and ensuring that economic growth is decoupled from environmental degradation. To achieve these goals, governments employ a wide range of tools, including tax breaks, subsidies, grants, carbon pricing mechanisms, and strict environmental regulations.
A green economy also emphasizes social inclusiveness, Green Economy ensuring that the transition to sustainability benefits all members of society, particularly vulnerable groups who are most affected by environmental degradation. Green Economy Government policies often include provisions for job creation in green industries, education and training for new skills, and social protection measures to ensure that no one is left behind in the transition.
This section will delve into six key areas of government policies for a green economy: renewable energy incentives, carbon pricing mechanisms, green transportation policies, sustainable agriculture support, waste management and recycling regulations, and financial incentives for green innovation.
Renewable Energy Incentives Green Economy
One of the cornerstones of any green economy policy framework is the promotion of renewable energy sources. Governments have introduced a range of incentives to encourage the production and consumption of renewable energy, such as wind, solar, and hydropower. These incentives are critical for reducing reliance on fossil fuels, which are the primary source of greenhouse gas emissions.
Renewable energy incentives often take the form of subsidies and tax breaks. For instance, many governments offer production tax credits (PTCs) and investment tax credits (ITCs) to companies that generate renewable energy or invest in renewable energy infrastructure. These financial incentives lower the cost of renewable energy projects, making them more competitive with traditional fossil fuel-based energy sources.
Feed-in tariffs (FITs) are another common incentive mechanism. Green Economy Under a FIT program, renewable energy producers are guaranteed a fixed price for the electricity they generate, often over a long-term contract. This provides a stable revenue stream and reduces the financial risk associated with renewable energy investments. Net metering programs, which allow individuals and businesses to sell excess renewable energy back to the grid, are another way governments encourage the adoption of renewable technologies.
Governments also support renewable energy through research and development (R&D) funding. Green Economy By investing in the development of new technologies, governments can help bring down the cost of renewable energy and make it more accessible. Many governments also provide grants and low-interest loans for renewable energy projects, particularly for smaller-scale projects such as rooftop solar installations.
In addition to financial incentives, governments often mandate the use of renewable energy through renewable portfolio standards (RPS). An RPS requires utilities to obtain a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable sources, creating a guaranteed market for renewable energy. This not only supports the growth of the renewable energy industry but also helps reduce the overall carbon footprint of the energy sector.
Green Economy The combination of financial incentives and regulatory mandates has been instrumental in driving the rapid growth of renewable energy in many parts of the world. Countries such as Germany, Denmark, and China have become global leaders in renewable energy production, thanks in large part to strong government policies that promote green energy development.
Carbon Pricing Mechanisms
Carbon pricing is a critical tool in the fight against climate change and a key component of government policies for a green economy. By putting a price on carbon emissions, governments create an economic incentive for businesses and individuals to reduce their carbon footprint. There are two main types of carbon pricing mechanisms: carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems.
A carbon tax directly sets a price on carbon by levying a tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels. This encourages businesses and consumers to reduce their use of carbon-intensive energy sources and shift toward cleaner alternatives. The revenue generated from carbon taxes is often used to fund green initiatives, such as renewable energy projects or energy efficiency programs, or to provide rebates to low-income households to offset higher energy costs.
Cap-and-trade systems, also known as emissions trading schemes (ETS), work by setting a limit (or cap) on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions that can be emitted by covered entities, such as power plants or industrial facilities. Companies are issued emission allowances, which they can trade with one another. Companies that can reduce their emissions at a lower cost can sell their excess allowances to companies that face higher costs for reducing emissions. This creates a market for carbon allowances and incentivizes businesses to invest in cleaner technologies.
Both carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems are designed to internalize the environmental cost of carbon emissions, making it more expensive to pollute and more profitable to invest in sustainable practices. These mechanisms can drive innovation, as businesses seek out new technologies and processes to reduce their carbon liabilities.
Several countries and regions have implemented carbon pricing policies with varying degrees of success. The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is one of the largest and most established cap-and-trade programs in the world. Canada has implemented a nationwide carbon tax, with revenue returned to households through rebates. In the United States, some states, such as California, have implemented their own cap-and-trade programs in the absence of a national carbon pricing policy.
However, carbon pricing mechanisms face challenges, including political opposition and concerns about economic competitiveness. In some cases, businesses argue that carbon pricing increases costs and puts them at a disadvantage compared to competitors in countries without similar policies. To address these concerns, governments often include provisions to protect industries that are vulnerable to international competition, such as offering rebates or exemptions for certain sectors.
Green Transportation Policies
Transportation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in urban areas. To promote a green economy, governments are implementing a range of policies aimed at reducing emissions from the transportation sector. These policies focus on promoting the use of public transportation, encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), and improving fuel efficiency standards.
One of the most effective ways to reduce transportation emissions is to encourage the use of public transportation. Governments invest in expanding and improving public transit systems, such as buses, trains, and subways, to make them more accessible and attractive to commuters. By providing reliable and affordable public transportation options, governments can reduce the number of cars on the road and lower overall emissions.
In addition to improving public transportation, governments are offering incentives for the purchase of electric vehicles (EVs). These incentives often take the form of tax credits or rebates for EV buyers, which help offset the higher upfront cost of electric vehicles compared to traditional gasoline-powered cars. Some governments also offer additional perks for EV owners, such as access to carpool lanes or free parking in city centers.
Governments are also investing in the infrastructure needed to support electric vehicles, such as building charging stations. A lack of charging infrastructure is often cited as a barrier to EV adoption, so governments play a critical role in addressing this challenge. By providing grants or partnering with private companies, governments can help build a network of charging stations that makes EVs a more convenient option for drivers.
Another important component of green transportation policies is improving fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks. Governments set regulations that require automakers to produce vehicles that meet certain fuel efficiency targets, which helps reduce the amount of fuel consumed and the emissions produced by the transportation sector. Some governments also implement vehicle emissions standards, which limit the amount of pollutants that cars and trucks can emit.
In addition to these policies, governments are encouraging the use of alternative modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. Investments in bike lanes, pedestrian infrastructure, and bike-sharing programs make it easier for people to choose low-emission forms of transportation. These efforts not only reduce emissions but also improve public health by promoting physical activity.
Sustainable Agriculture Support
Agriculture is both a contributor to and a victim of environmental degradation. It is responsible for significant greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, water use, and pollution from fertilizers and pesticides. At the same time, agriculture is highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, including more frequent droughts, floods, and changing weather patterns. As a result, governments are increasingly focusing on promoting sustainable agricultural practices as part of their green economy policies.
One of the key ways governments support sustainable agriculture is through financial incentives for farmers who adopt environmentally friendly practices. These incentives can take the form of subsidies, grants, or low-interest loans for practices such as organic farming, agroforestry, and conservation tillage. By providing financial support, governments encourage farmers to invest in sustainable practices that might otherwise be cost-prohibitive.
Governments also provide technical assistance and education to help farmers transition to more sustainable practices. This can include training programs on topics such as water conservation, soil health, and pest management, as well as access to research and technology that supports sustainable farming. Extension services, which provide hands-on assistance to farmers, are another important tool for promoting sustainable agriculture.
In addition to financial and technical support, governments implement regulations to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture. These regulations can include restrictions on the use of certain pesticides and fertilizers, requirements for buffer zones to protect water sources from agricultural runoff, and mandates for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock and manure management.
Governments are also working to promote more sustainable food systems by encouraging the consumption of locally produced and organic foods. Public procurement policies, which require government institutions such as schools and hospitals to purchase a certain percentage of their food from sustainable sources, are one way governments support the development of local, sustainable food systems.
Another important aspect of sustainable agriculture policies is protecting biodiversity and promoting ecosystem services. Governments often provide incentives for farmers to preserve natural habitats on their land, such as wetlands, forests, and grasslands, which provide important ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, water filtration, and pollination. By promoting biodiversity and ecosystem health, governments help ensure that agricultural systems are more resilient to environmental changes.
Waste Management and Recycling Regulations
Effective waste management is a critical component of a green economy. Governments play a key role in regulating waste disposal, promoting recycling, and encouraging the reduction of waste generation. These efforts are aimed at reducing the environmental impact of waste, including greenhouse gas emissions from landfills, pollution from improper disposal, and the depletion of natural resources through excessive consumption.
One of the main ways governments regulate waste is by setting standards for waste disposal. This includes regulating landfills, incinerators, and hazardous waste facilities to ensure that they operate in an environmentally responsible manner. Governments also implement bans or restrictions on certain types of waste, such as single-use plastics, to reduce the amount of waste that ends up in landfills or the environment.
In addition to regulating waste disposal, governments are increasingly focusing on promoting recycling and waste reduction. Many governments have implemented extended producer responsibility (EPR) programs, which require manufacturers to take responsibility for the disposal of the products they produce. This can include requirements for companies to fund recycling programs or take back products at the end of their life cycle.
Governments also implement policies to encourage households and businesses to recycle more. This can include providing curbside recycling services, setting recycling targets, and offering incentives for recycling, such as deposit return schemes for beverage containers. Public awareness campaigns and education programs are also important tools for promoting recycling and waste reduction.
In some cases, governments use economic instruments to promote waste reduction, such as charging fees for waste disposal or providing financial incentives for businesses that reduce waste. Pay-as-you-throw programs, which charge households based on the amount of waste they generate, are one example of how governments use pricing mechanisms to encourage waste reduction.
Another important component of waste management policies is promoting the circular economy, which focuses on keeping materials in use for as long as possible through recycling, reusing, and remanufacturing. Governments support the circular economy by providing incentives for businesses that adopt circular practices, such as designing products for durability and recyclability, and by setting targets for reducing waste and increasing recycling rates.
Source :
Government Policies for a Green Economy: Incentives and Regulations
#Carbon Pricing Mechanisms#Circular Economy Policies#Clean Energy Subsidies#Climate Change Mitigation Strategies#Climate Resilience Planning#Community Sustainability Programs#Eco-Friendly Transportation Initiatives#Eco-Tourism Development Strategies#Energy Efficiency Standards#Environmental Policy Frameworks#Environmental Protection Regulations#Government Grants For Green Projects#Government Policies For A Green Economy#Green Building Regulations#Green Job Creation Initiatives#Green Tax Incentives#Incentives For Energy Audits#Incentives For Sustainable Development#Investment In Green Technologies#Low-Emission Vehicle Incentives#Pollution Control Policies#Public Transport Expansion Regulations#Regulations Promoting Renewable Energy#Renewable Energy Certificates#Smart City Regulations#Sustainable Agriculture Policies#Sustainable Forestry Practices#Sustainable Urban Development Policies#Waste Management Policies#Water Conservation Regulations
1 note
·
View note
Text
Logitech Unveils the MX Creative Console
Logitech has officially launched its highly anticipated MX Creative Console, a revolutionary tool aimed at transforming how digital creators work. This innovative product is designed to provide creators with instant access to critical controls and fully customizable features, simplifying workflows and automating repetitive tasks, making it an ideal companion for artists, designers, and content…
#3D design#Adobe#Adobe Creative Cloud#Adobe plugins#After Effects#AI integration#AI workflows#analog navigation#artists#Audition#carbon footprint#content creation#creative professionals#creative tools#creators#custom controls#customization#deep integration#Design#designers#dialpad#digital creation#dynamic display keys#free membership#FSC-certified#Generative Fill#Illustrator#keypad#Logi Marketplace#Logi Options+
0 notes
Text
ESG and Sustainability Reporting: Comprehensive Guide and Best Practices
In today's business landscape, ESG and Sustainability Reporting have become crucial for companies aiming to demonstrate their commitment to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. This comprehensive guide explores the importance of ESG and Sustainability Reporting, its benefits, and best practices for effective implementation.
The Importance of ESG and Sustainability Reporting
ESG and Sustainability Reporting helps organizations:
Enhance transparency and accountability.
Attract socially conscious investors.
Improve risk management.
Foster a positive corporate reputation.
Comply with regulatory requirements.
Benefits of ESG and Sustainability Reporting
Investor Attraction: Companies with robust ESG practices often attract investors looking for sustainable and ethical investments.
Risk Management: Identifying and addressing ESG risks can prevent potential issues and reduce long-term costs.
Reputation Management: Transparent reporting on ESG efforts can enhance a company's public image and build trust with stakeholders.
Regulatory Compliance: Adhering to ESG reporting standards helps companies meet regulatory requirements and avoid penalties.
Best Practices for ESG and Sustainability Reporting
Define Clear Objectives: Establish clear goals and objectives for your ESG initiatives.
Engage Stakeholders: Involve stakeholders in the reporting process to ensure comprehensive and accurate data.
Use Standardized Frameworks: Adopt recognized frameworks such as GRI, SASB, or TCFD for consistent reporting.
Ensure Data Accuracy: Implement robust data collection and verification processes to ensure the accuracy of reported information.
Communicate Transparently: Clearly communicate your ESG performance, achievements, and areas for improvement.
Continuously Improve: Regularly review and update your ESG strategies and reporting processes.
FAQs
Q: What is ESG and Sustainability Reporting? A: ESG and Sustainability Reporting involves disclosing a company's environmental, social, and governance practices and performance to stakeholders.
Q: Why is ESG and Sustainability Reporting important? A: It enhances transparency, attracts investors, improves risk management, builds reputation, and ensures regulatory compliance.
Q: What frameworks are used for ESG and Sustainability Reporting? A: Common frameworks include the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
Q: How can companies improve their ESG and Sustainability Reporting? A: By defining clear objectives, engaging stakeholders, using standardized frameworks, ensuring data accuracy, communicating transparently, and continuously improving their practices.
Conclusion
ESG and Sustainability Reporting is essential for modern businesses seeking to demonstrate their commitment to sustainable and ethical practices. By following best practices and using standardized frameworks, companies can enhance their transparency, attract investors, and build a positive reputation.
Source:- https://esgandsustainabilityreporting.blogspot.com/2024/06/esg-and-sustainability-reporting.html
#Waste Strategy and Circular Economy#ESG and Sustainability Reporting#Net Zero and Carbon Management#Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) and Environment Product Declaration(EPD)#GHG Accounting and Assessment#Coastal Protection and Marine Bioremediation#Sustainable Aquaculture#Air Pollution Control equipment’s#Water Pollution Control Equipment#Energy and Water Audit
0 notes
Text
Best regards
Can The Sun Rays Creation Process Depend On Saturn Motion?
or
or
or
Abstract
Paper Question
Can The Sun Rays Creation Process Depend On Saturn Motion?
The question tells us (If Saturn Is Not Found In The Solar System The Sun Rays Can Not Be Created)- If This is a fact- That proves we understand wrongly (completely) how the sun rays is created!
The question refuses directly The Sun Nuclear Fusion Theory – and tells us – The Sun Rays Is Produced by another Method – and
This another method depends on Saturn motion perfectly and without Saturn motion this method can NOT work and No Sun Rays Can Be Produced
The question answer can be summarized in 3 points
(Point No. 1) The Refutation Of The Sun Nuclear Fusion Theory
(Point No. 2) The Planet Motion Reason And Design
(Point No. 3) Saturn Effect On The Solar System Motion
Let's discuss these points in following…
(Point No. 1) The Refutation Of The Sun Nuclear Fusion Theory
There Are 7 Facts Refute The Sun Nuclear Fusion Theory…
Planet Motion Produces Energy
The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the sun gravitational field (Moreover the sun does Not create a gravitational field)
The Gravitational Waves Can Move By Speed Of Light (C= 300000 km/s)
The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions
The Sun Rays Creation Process Depends on A Relative Motion
The Sun Corona Temperature Is (5 million Kelvin) and the sun surface is 5800 Kelvin because the energy is NOT produced by The Sun Nuclear Fusion.
The Sun Data Depends On The Planets Data
Let's summarize these facts in following
(Fact No. 1) Planet Motion Produces Energy
Any moving body produces energy (1/2 mv^2), the planet motion produces energy also, but where's the planet motion energy?
The planet doesn't store the energy in its body because it would raise this planet temperature and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically where can the planet motion energy be stored? In the space in waves form-
Means- the planet motion energy creates waves in the space
The space is similar to the sea of water, and the planet is similar to a fish swims through the sea of water- as we know- the fish moves by hitting the water by its body and by this action waves are created in the water- also we conclude the water moves by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force-
Similar to that, the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- these waves are similar to the water waves, they move far from their planet and can be reflected- also we conclude the space waves move by a velocity equal the planet velocity-
Also���because the planets revolve around the sun in one direction- the planets motions energies waves move toward Pluto perpendicular on the revolution direction.
In Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by the planets velocities total (9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s)
Pluto reflected this unified wave toward Venus and this wave revolves around the sun through the Earth moon orbit- because- all planets motion energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-
And because the wave revolves around the sun through the moon orbit- the moon velocity is added to the total (the moon velocity = the Earth velocity) – by that
The velocities total be (176 +29.8 = 205.8 km/s)
Shortly-
The Planets Motions Energies Are Unified Together And Produce One Unified Wave Revolves Around The Sun Through The Earth Moon Orbit And This Unified Wave Moves By A Velocity 205.8 km/s.
(Fact No. 2) The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field (Moreover The Sun Does Not Create A Gravitational Field)
I claim the space waves which I have described are the gravitational waves, the scientists called them wrongly supposing that these waves are produced by the sun gravitational field but this is NOT True – on the contrary- these waves are produced by the planets motions energies.
The previous analysis proves clearly that, the planet motion must create waves in the space- by that- I have a reason to claim that (the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies)- and also the sun doesn't create a gravitational field – let's prove that in following to cause a confidence in my conclusion
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitation Field
The Sun Rotation Period is (25.4 days at equator) and (34.4 days at pole), that proves the sun has NO massive gravity (even it has no gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise it would rotate in one period of time)
No planet moves by the sun gravity (Newton Is Wrong).
The planet moves by its creation force- means- the planet creation and motion should be done by the same one force because if two forces have effects on the same one planet, this planet would be broken
Mass gravity Can Not Cause any Motion- (Newton is wrong)– let's explain that -Mass gravity is a bond between 2 masses – the Earth and the moon are bond together by the mass gravity- They are similar to a lorry and its trailer– If a force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth– this is the effect of the mass gravity but the mass gravity can't cause any motion! Why? Suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity- The moon motion produces energy (1/2mv^2)- and– From what source this motion energy will be provided? From the mass itself! means- If the Earth causes the moon to move that necessitates to decrease the Earth and moon masses by the motion energy– it's wrong definition for the mass gravity - the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- and if a force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth, in this case, this force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon– but No Motion can be done by the mass gravity.
(Fact No. 3) The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light (C= 300000 km/s)
This fact I provide by a direct proof – in following –
This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83
This new article states the gravitational waves can move by high velocity motion and can produce a light beam.
Notice –
I Claim The Sun Rays Is Created By This Method (The Gravitational Waves Motions) And Not By The Sun Nuclear Fusion
But- I have proved, the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- how can the gravitational waves move by speed of light if they are produced by the planets motions energies? And If the gravitational waves move by speed of light how they can produce a light beam?
The fact is that
The planets motions use different rates of time- for that – the planets motions energies are produced based on different rates of time and the motion by speed of light is done by using different rates of time – let's explain how the unified wave (205.8 km/s) moves by speed of light relative to the sun point of space
W agreed that
There's one unified wave revolves around the sun through the Earth moon orbit and this wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s relative to the sun point of space
This is A Relative Motion between two players (the unified wave) and (the sun point of space)
The two players use different rates of time which is
(one second of the sun clock = 1461 seconds of the unified wave clock)
The unified wave (205.8 km/s) moves in 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km/s
But the sun clock moves only (one second) during these (1461 seconds of the unified wave clock) –means-
The distance 300000 km is passed in (one second) of the sun clock- by that
The different velocity between the unified wave and the sun motions is 300000 km/s = speed of light (C)
This analysis asks a new question (How Can The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time?) this question is answered in Point (No. 2* the planet motion reason)
But there's one more question we left behind- let's remember it
If the gravitational waves move by speed of light (300000 km/s) how can these waves produce a light beam? Let's answer in the following fact No. (4*)
(Fact No. 4) The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions
The gravitational waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) relative to the sun point of space- this idea is proved by the article states (the gravitational waves move by speed of light) BUT
How Can This Motion Produce A Light Beam? The energy is reflected in the solar system, and the energy reflection causes to square the velocities, for that, the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) be squared (C^2) by the energy reflection- and the value (C^2) is the source of energy can produce the light beam
The reflection of energy and its effects are proved strongly in my paper
The sun rays creation process provides three new features which are
The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light (C)
The Energy Reflection Squares The Velocities (C^2)
The Sun Rays Is Produced From (C^2) That Means The Sun Rays Is Produced By A Relative Motion
(Fact No. 5) The Sun Rays Creation Process Depends on A Relative Motion
There are three basic critics against The Sun Nuclear Fusion Theory-
(First Critic) The Source Of Energy- while the solar system is so rich in the motion energy- the nuclear fusion theory invented strange source of energy to produce the sun rays and left the stored motion energy without using- logically- the energy can NOT be stored forever and should be used- The sun rays is the very good outlet for the stored energy- means- the sun rays should be produced from the planets motions energies which are stored in the space in waves form (the gravitational waves)
(Second Critic) The Sun Rays Production Method- The sun rays are produced by the relative motion- means- the used technical method is the relative motion- the motion produces a relative motion with different velocity = speed of light (C= 300000 km/s) and by the reflection of energy this velocity be squared (C^2) and the sun rays is produced from this value (C^2)
The important thing here is (The Relative Motion) why? because this relative motion is found between two players (the unified wave motion 205.8 km/s) and (the sun point of space motion 1 km/s) – the light production process depends on the different velocity between the two motions (C=300000 km/s)- means- if this different velocity is decreased (NO Light Beam Can Be Created)
So the method needs the different velocity to be (C= speed of light =300000 km/s) and that necessitates the unified wave velocity to be (205.8 km/s) and the sun point of space to be (1 km/s) BUT there's NO any other point in the space moves by this velocity (1 km/s)- only – the sun point of space moves by 1 km/s – later I prove that
Means- the different velocity (C=speed of light =300000 km/s) can be produced only between the unified wave motion (205.8 km/s) and the sun point of space
That tells- the light can be produced only on the sun point of space because this is the only one point in the space moves by velocity 1 km/s –
for that reason- the sun point of space is defined geometrically!
What does that mean (The Sun Point Is Defined Geometrically)?
The designer used many mathematical calculations and geometrical rules to define the sun position in the sky and the sun creation data- let's give one example
(The sun diameter / the moon diameter) = (Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon dist)
The previous equation enables us to see the sun disc = the moon disc and that causes the total solar eclipse to be occurred- but– why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
Because the designer made all mathematical calculations to guarantee the velocity of the sun point of space to be only (1 km/s) and Never be faster
Let's see more data behind the total solar eclipse
4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) = 1.39 mkm (the sun diameter) x 3475 km =12104 km x 406000 km = 12756 km x 384000 km = 6792 km x 2 x 363000 km
3475 km = the moon diameter 12104 km = Venus diameter
12756 km = The Earth diameter 6792 km = Mars diameter
363000 km, 384000 km and 406000 km are the distances between the Earth and its moon in perigee, orbital distance and apogee radiuses respectively
We see how the data is designed geometrically accurately- why the data is created by this accurate system? because the designer aimed by all means to make the velocity of the sun point of space to be 1 km/s and never moves by any faster velocity
We remember (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s) this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation-
Here also- the sun diameter is defined geometrically in proportionality with many planets to guarantee the velocity of the sun point of space be only (1 km/s)
This argument is so powerful against the nuclear fusion theory, because
The Sun Data Proves The Sun Rays Is Produced By (A Relative Motion) and not by nuclear fusion- the designer had a necessity to create these proportionalities between the sun position and data on one side with the planets data on the other side- the required task was (to create a system guarantee the velocity of the sun point of space to be 1 km/s and never moves by faster velocity) – this is the cornerstone in the sun rays creation process because the rays is created by A Relative Motion- based on different velocity = 300000 km/s
This velocity is the method by which the sun rays is created and If This Velocity Is Decreased No Light Beam Can Be Produced.
Notice
The sun circumference =4.37 million km and the sun rotation period at equator is 25.4 days – if we calculate the velocity of this motion (4.37 million km /25.4 days) the velocity be = 2 km /sec
This is a strong proof for my theory- and we note that- the machine uses the velocity 1 km/s and the sun velocity (2 km/s) forced the machine to make (double for all values) means- for example- the sun rays is created not by (90000 million km) but created by (180000 million km) as I explain later- means – this change in velocity from (1 km/s) to (2 km/s) has great effect on the data but the machine can still produce the light beam- shortly- the sun rays is created by this relative motion with different velocity = C= speed of light = 300000 km/s
(Third Critic)
The sun corona temperature is (5 million Kelvin) but the sun surface is 5800 Kelvin
This data proves strongly my theory – where
The sun rays is NOT produced by the sun nuclear fusion – means – the energy is NOT produced from the sun body – BUT
The energy is produced by the planets motions energies and for that the corona has energy more than the sun body- because the energy comes from out of the sun into the sun- shortly- the energy out of the sun is greater than the energy inside the sun because the sun does NOT produce this energy- this energy is produced by the planets motions energies.
(Fact No. 6) The Sun Corona Temperature Is (5 million Kelvin) and the sun surface is 5800 Kelvin because the energy is NOT produced by The Sun Nuclear Fusion.
This fact is told just before – the sun corona temperature is a strong proof supports my theory tells (the sun rays is created by the planets motions energies total and not by the nuclear fusion)
(Fact No. 7) The Sun Data Depends On The Planets Data
As We Have Seen In The Total Solar Eclipse Data, the sun data is in proportionality with the planets data proves the sun rays is created by the planets motions energies- But – not only this data
The sun all data is created depending on the planets data – let's see one more example
243/224.7= 29.53/27.3 = 27.3/25.4 = 1.0725
243 and 224.7 days Venus rotation and orbital periods respectively
29.53 and 27.3 days The moon day and rotation periods respectively
25.4 days = the sun rotation period at equator
The data shows clear harmony as if the sun data very similar to the planets data
(Point No. 2) The Planet Motion Reason And Design
A- The Solar System Creation Theory
The solar system is created from one energy- this energy is provided by one light beam its velocity is 1.16 million km per second
From this energy the space is created firstly and the light energy is consumed in the space creation and the rest energy is found in One Wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) – from this one wave the planets are created-
The creation is done in 2 stages
(First stage The Space Creation)
The original light beam (its velocity 1.16 million km per second) creates the planets orbits before any planet creation, starting from Mercury to Pluto, because of the orbits creation, the light energy is consumed and its velocity be 300000 km/s
We understand this is one light beam- its velocity was 1.16 million km per second and after the space creation this light velocity be 300000 km/s
(Second stage The Planets Creation)
The planets are created from this one wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
NOTICE
There are strong proves prove a coherence of light is done between the light 1.16 million km per second and the light 300000 km/s- let's see this idea deeply
The original light beam its speed (1.16 million km per second) started its motion from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit (Mercury orbit is the light motion origin point) – and this light beam created all orbits before any planet creation- and the light lost its energy in the space creation and the rest energy is one light beam move by the known speed of light is (C=300000 km/s)
The other light beam is the rest energy- it moves by the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and it moves in the reflected direction from Pluto toward Venus and Mercury-
Now –there's a coherence of light between these two light beams- the coherence is proved BUT we should ask (how can this coherence be occurred)? Because the original light (1.16 million km/s) is consumed and its energy is used already and the rest energy be this light its speed is (300000 km/s) - HOW can the light (1.16 million km/s) meet the light (300000 km/s)??
Imagine we have (116 dollars) and we spent all money except (30 dollars)- how can this (30 dollars) meet the original money (116 dollars)??
Let's try to answer
Suppose the light beam (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction (in the space) and also (in the time) – that can enable the light (300000 km/s) to move into its past and meet the original one (1.16 million km/s) in the past and the coherence can be done there in the past- and we see the coherence results and effects on the solar system-
Means – the light (300000 km/s) moves into its past and found the original light (1.16 million km/s) in the past and the coherence could be done there in the past
Please note- this analysis tells us the light can move on the time axis means can move into the future and into the past- but the matter can Not do that- I explain the reason in my paper (No. I-6)
Shortly- we have a proof for the motion on the time axis and we can create the time machine by this method and the light will be our tool which can move into the past to get pictures and data from the past to us-
Now
Let's see how the planets are created
B- The Solar Planets Creation
We know- The solar system is one wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
Through the space- (till now NO any planet is created)
Now -The Solar System needs To Create A Stationary Point Its velocity Zero relative to the moving wave its velocity is 300000 km/s
This is the basic information in the solar system design-
The solar system needs to create a stationary point relative to the wave motion- by that – two velocities will be found which are (v1= the wave velocity 300000 km/s) and (v2= Zero= the stationary point relative to the wave motion)–these two velocities produce a relative motion with different velocity 300000 km/s–
Notice – the stationary point velocity is 1 km/s (= Zero approximately)
Notice– The solar system is one wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s), or the solar system is carried on light beam moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s),
Everything in the solar system is carried on this one light beam motion- and nothing is static- No stationary point can be found here-
This is similar to ships are found on the sea- nothing is stopped- all ships move and can't stop- because the motion is done forcedly by the sea waves.
The stationary point will be similar to the whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page-
We see the whirlpool doesn't move with the sea waves- for that the whirlpool can be considered as a stationary point relative to the sea waves.
But
The solar system needs to create the stationary point
Now – let's try to create this stationary point in following
The solar system uses two procedures to do that,
The first procedure
The wave its velocity 300000 km/s revolves around a point in space (any point in space), the revolution motion creates 2 equal velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value and opposite in direction- their total be equal Zero-means- the revolution motion creates One Stationary Point in the center of the revolution.
The second procedure
The previous idea is correct- but –the velocity 300000 km/s is a huge one and to decrease it to Zero velocity this is a complex process– for that- the wave (300000 km/s) created small waves with low velocities to use them as steps to decrease the velocity to Zero- the small waves are The Planets- (The planet is a small wave moves by low velocity relative to the mother wave its velocity 300000 km/s)
Why Are These Small Waves Required?
Because the velocity 300000 km/s is decreased to Zero by using these small waves and their low velocities- the low velocities are used as steps to decrease the wave velocity (300000 km/s) to be (Zero)- this process decreases the velocity gradually from 300000 km/s to Zero depending on these small waves velocities (the planets velocities)
Means- the planets are created for this process to decrease the wave velocity from 300000 km/s to Zero- and The Planet Is A Small Wave Moves By Low Velocity
Shortly – the solar system has one complete system of velocities, Starting from Zero to 300000 km/s where the planets velocities are the steps between the two velocities –
Please note clearly this idea- because-
The solar system has one motor for all motions which is the wave motion by speed of light (300000 km/s) No any other motor is found in the solar system
The planets are similar to carriages in one train but the train engine is the light motion by that the only motor under all motions in the solar system is the wave motion (speed of light 300000 km/s)
So, we have to ask- how can any planet move by a velocity Less than (300000 km/s)?
Because – The Planets Use Different Rates Of Time-
The rates of time is created based on the velocities rates –
For example-
Mercury velocity =1.6 Earth velocity, for that, one hour of Mercury clock= 1.6 hours of the Earth clock and by that Mercury and the Earth move equal distances in equal periods of time.
This is very important fact because – the light moves carrying all planets with it- Now the light moves (one motion) and passes (one distance) in (one period of time)
All planets will move (this same motion) and pass (this same distance) in (this same period of time)- but
We need different velocities for the planets to work as steps to decrease the velocity (300000 km/s) to Zero (Stationary point)- means- it's essential to have (different velocities) and that causes the using of the rates of time inevitable and essential method to enable the solar system to do its motion.
C- The Rate Of Time Use
(i)
The Rate Of Time Effect
The rate of time controls the moving energy rate-
For example (One Hour Of Mercury Clock = 24 Hours Of Pluto Clock)
What does that mean?
It means, Pluto motion energy (for 24 hours) can be used by Mercury in (one hour)
Here - the solar system is similar to a river of water moves from a point to another and the rate of time defines the amount of the transported water (energy)
In more details
The energy is transported among the planets and the amount of energy is defined by the rates of time- because- the energy transportation necessitates to transport the motion among the planets and the motion transportation caused to transport the rates of time among the planets-
(ii)
The Rate Of Time Use
We agreed that, the solar system has one motor only which is the wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- means- no velocity can be less than speed of light unless it depends on a rate of time –
Means- all planets velocities are created based on rates of time- that causes the rates of time to be used in all motions in the solar system
Let's remember,
Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- we remember the accurate vision- we observed one swimming fish, the fish hits the water by its tail and swims, that creates a wave in the sea and this wave moves by the fish velocity because of the reaction-
Similar to that, Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy waves are created and these waves move by Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) –BUT- Mercury velocity is created based on a rate of time- that causes the waves motions use rates of time-
I try to show how the gravitational waves motions depend on rates of time
For more clear vision
We have to consider that the solar system has one motor only and this motor is the wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) for that any motion in the solar system with velocity less than speed of light (must depend on rates of time)
The rates of time = the velocities rate –
Let's remember out example
Mercury velocity =1.6 Earth velocity by that (One second of Mercury clock = 1.6 seconds of the Earth clock)– by this rate of time Mercury and the Earth move equal distances in equal periods of time -
We understand the reason- where
The planets are geometrical points on the same one light beam- and this light beam moves carrying all planets with it- and
The light moves one motion, passes one distance in one period of time, for that, all planets move this same motion, pass this same distance in this same period of time
(iii)
The Solar Planets Basic Rates Of Time
Let's remember the basic rates of time
(one hour of Mercury clock = 24 hours of any planet clock) and
(one hour of Mercury clock = 576 hours of Saturn clock)
That causes
(one hour of any planet clock = 24 hours of Saturn clock)
This rate of time is defined by Mercury motion effect And
The major rate of time between the planet and light motion is
(one second of light clock = one solar day of the planet clock)
This rate is a complex one because there are 2 velocities of the light (as I proved)
The original velocity 1.16 million km per second and the known velocity 300000 km/s
Means
(one second of light 1.16 mkm/s = one solar day of the planet clock) and
(one second of light 300000 km/s = one solar day of the planet clock)
That causes the rate of time (1=24) to be so necessary to create the harmony between the planets and light motions- for that this rate (1=24) is used by Mercury motion
Notice
The rate of time is defined basically by the planets velocities as explained before – for example - Mercury velocity = 1.6 the Earth velocity- means – one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock
But the solar system energy is reflected three times in the solar system, and each reflection causes to square the velocity, by that, the rate of time (v1/v2) be growing to be (v1/v2)^3
That explains why the planets orbital periods rate = (their velocities rate)^3
Also all other planets data is worked as rates of time-
D- The Unified Wave Moves By Speed Of Light
Let's remember out equation
300000 km = 7.1 x (205.8)^2 where
7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect for velocity 297000 km/s (= 0.99 C)
205.8 km/s = the 9 planets velocities total (176 km/s) + the Earth moon velocity
(The moon velocity =29.8 km/s = the Earth velocity because they revolve together)
Why does the data use the squared value (205.8)^2?
We know the answer- but - Let's remember it
The planets are geometrical points on the same light beam and move with its motion- for that- the planets velocities rates creates rates of time– for example- Mercury velocity = 1.6 the Earth velocity- that means – one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock- as I have explained before
Now- the velocity (205.8 km/s) move relative to the stationary point its velocity Zero (The Sun) and creates a rate of time (1 second = 205.8 seconds) –
(One Second Of The Unified Wave Clock = 205.8 Seconds Of The Sun Clock)
But – the energy is reflected in the solar system (I proved in the paper),
The energy reflection reflects the players – means
(one second of the Sun clock = 205.8 seconds of the unified wave clock)
means (one second of the sun clock = 205.8 seconds of any planet clock) –
Now during one second of the sun clock, the wave clock needs 205.8 seconds while the wave moves by a velocity 205.8 km/s- means –
During one second of the sun clock, the wave moves 42253 km = 300000 km /7.1
By that the velocity is 42253 km/s which is equivalent to the speed of light
Notice
The velocity 42253 km/s is equivalent to the speed of light 300000 km/s because of the length contraction effect rate (7.1) – because
The reflection of energy causes to reflect the geometrical effects and the rate 7.1 which caused (length contraction) will cause (length increasing)
The length contraction and increasing both effects are produced by the same one motion but the reflection of energy causes to reflect the geometrical effects.
E- Planet Velocity Analysis
DATA
My 5th equation (v1v2=322)- the planets velocities prove it–let's see that in following
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)
322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)
DATA ANALYSIS
The previous data tells the planets velocities are defined by two features
(1st Feature)
The planets velocities are complementary one another –means - each planet velocity is complementary with another planet – means– The planets velocities are defined in pairs and not in single planets.
(Notice, the inner planets orbital inclinations are defined by the rule (v1/v2), for example, Mercury orbital inclination 7 deg = Mercury velocity 47.4/ Uranus velocity 6.8- that proves the effect of the rule (v1v2=322) on the planet motion)
(2nd Feature)
Why the constant is 322 because
1160000 seconds = 322 hours – means- there's a light velocity = 1.16 million km /s and this light moves for one second passes 1160000 km but we see this distance as a period (1160000 seconds =322 hours)- and - the planets velocities are defined based on this velocity 1.16 million km /s
Discussion
Ceres velocity tells the idea - Ceres is used as the origin point - as a result the outer planets be complementary with the inner planets – for that the rule (v1v2=322) controls the planets velocities.
(a)
The planets velocities are created based on one design- Ceres velocity is used as the origin point for this design
(b)
Shortly
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during 6.8 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 47.4 hours a distance = 1160000 km
And
Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during 13.1 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 24.1 hours a distance = 1160000 km
(error 2%) - And
Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during 2 x 5.4 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 2 x 29.8 hours a distance = 1160000 km
And
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 2 x 4.7 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 35 hours a distance = 1160000 km
(error 2%)
Notice - Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 33.2 hours a distance = 1160000 km
(between 33.2 and Venus velocity 35 km/s the error 5%)
(c)
The planets velocities definition depend on the speed of light 300000 km/s
As we have seen before in the equation
300000 km = 7.1 x (205.8)^2
Here we see the planets velocities are defined based on two velocities which are – the speed 1.16 million km per second and the light speed 300000 km/s- that's one proof among many others which prove the coherence of light is done between the light 1.16 million km per second and the light 300000 km/s
Why is it necessary to review the planet velocity analysis here?
Because the planet velocity analysis proves the sun is created after all planets creation and motion -Let's see that in the next point
F- The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion (Proves)
We analyzed the planet velocity definition before, let's remember its basic feature
DATA
We remember the rule (v1v2=322) (my 5th equation)– let's prove it
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)
322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)
DISCUSSION
The data tells
The Planets Velocities Are Defined Based On One Design
The planets are added in pairs in the solar group- means- No single planet can be added to the solar group
Now we have to ask
Can We Add A New Planet To The Solar Group?
Let's answer in following
I add a new planet after Pluto
I suppose the new planet orbital distance to be =7000 million km
This new planet velocity will be 4.3 km/s (We can define it by kepler law)
Now we need the complementary planet because of the rule (v1v2 =322)
(322 =4.3 x 75), means, the complementary planet velocity is 75 km/s
Where can we find a planet its velocity 75 km/s? this planet must be in the distance between the Sun and Mercury –
This planet orbital distance should be 23.2 million km
(57.9/23.2) = (75/47.4)^2 where
(57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance) and (47.4 km/s) Mercury velocity
Shortly –
It's hard to add any planet in the distance between Mercury and the Sun- means- we can't add any new planet to the solar group because of the Sun existence.
But-
How Could The Found Planets Be Added To The Solar System?
The Sun is created after all planets creation and motion- means – after all planets be in their orbits the Sun is created- In details-The planets were created in their orbits and revolve around a point of space, before the sun creation, and later the sun is created in this point of space around which the planets revolve
Because - technically- the Sun existence prevents to add any new planet to the solar system and also the Sun existence prevents any planet to change its orbit
(For example- Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated to its current orbit before the Sun creation And Mars couldn't return to its original orbit because of the Sun existence ) (Mars Migration is proved in the paper)
Notice
This analysis is another proof for my theory tells (The Sun Rays Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies And Nut By The Sun Nuclear Fusion)
Shortly
The sun rays can NOT be created without the solar planets because the sun rays are created from the planets motions energies – logically the planets are found and moving before the sun creation-
(Point No. 3) Saturn Motion Effect On The Solar System Motion
Let's remember our question
Can The Sun Rays Creation Process Depend On Saturn Motion?
The question tells us (If Saturn Is Not Found In The Solar System The Sun Rays Can Not Be Created)- Let's ask (what's Saturn role in the solar system motion?)
The main rates of time are
(one hour of Mercury clock = 24 hours of any planet clock = 576 h of Saturn clock)
That causes (one hour of any planet clock = 24 h of Saturn clock)
This rate of time is changed slightly by the velocities effect to produce the nest rate
205.8 km/s = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 21.4 second
205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total
The data tells
(one hour of any planet clock = 21.4 h of Saturn clock)
And Saturn created its rotation period (10.7 h) based on this rate (21.4 = 2 x 10.7 h)
The data shows- Saturn has the smallest rate of time in the solar system and by that Saturn moves more than any other planet- in fact
In the same period - Saturn moves a distance = all planets motions distances total
Shortly -the Sun rays is created by the planets motions energies BUT Saturn motion alone provides (50%) of all this energy – that makes Saturn the most important planet in the solar system -and because of that- Saturn motion provides the greatest rate of time in the solar system and based on this rate of time the sun rays is created
Shortly
The Sun rays creation depends directly on Saturn motion because Saturn provides (50%) of all provided energy for the sun rays and because Saturn motion creates the rate of time based on which the energy can be stored to produce the sun rays
Saturn is the motor behind the sun rays creation process – I analyze Saturn data in details in point no. (3) of the paper because Saturn data proves that – the planets motions causes to create the sun rays clearly
The Paper hypotheses
The paper provides 4 hypotheses with their explanations and proves – let's provide them in following
Hypothesis No. (1)
The space is created from one energy and this energy is provided by a light beam moves by a speed 1.16 million km per second – the speed is registered in the created space proves the speed is a fact.
Hypothesis No. (2)
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field– Moreover- The Sun Does NOT Produce A Gravitational Field And It Has No Massive Gravity-
Hypothesis No. (3)
Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Pluto was The Mercury Moon (Pluto size was equal Mercury size) But these two planets had migrated from their original orbits as a result for a collision- the planets migration caused a risk for the solar system geometrical design- Uranus and Jupiter the Two planets worked to repair the solar system design– that caused Jupiter orbit to be the main orbit in the solar system design- Jupiter orbit proves the speed 1.16 million km per second is a fact.
Hypothesis No. (4)
The Sun Is a phenomenon created by the planets motions
The sun rays is created from the gravitational waves motions energies and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies-
Based on that
The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions
And
The Sun Is NOT Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- instead- The Planets Motions Energies Total Is Used To Produce The Sun Rays
The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion –
Means
The Planets Are Created And Moving In Their Orbits Around A Point Of Space Before The Sun Creation- And The Sun Is Created On This Point Of Space around which the planets revolve –
And
No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity (Newton is Wrong) –
And
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field (Einstein Is Wrong)
And
The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions– means-The Sun creation and death depends on a cycle – means – after this current sun death another sun will be created for the solar system.
The Hypotheses Explanation
The abstract provides the hypotheses explanation and the paper provides their proves and discussions- In following the hypotheses will be explained in details
NOTICE –
The creatures and all matters on the Earth are created from the sun light energy and the sun light speed is 300000 km/s, because of that, the creature realization is limited to the speed 300000 km/s and can't realize the original speed (1.16 million km per second) that means the speed 300000 km/s is a limit for the creatures realization and not for the universe design.
Hypothesis No. (1)
The space is created from an energy and this energy is provided by a light beam moves by a speed 1.16 million km per second – the speed is registered in the created space which proves the speed is a fact
The Hypothesis Explanation
I- The Space Is Created By One Light Beam Energy- And This Light Beam Speed Is 1.16 million km per second
I-1 Preface (the main idea)
I-2 The Space Creation Method (the distances are one network)
I-3 Light Coherence between light (1.16 million km /s) and light (300000 km/s)
I-4 The Matter definition (based on my planet diameter equation)
I-5 The Planets Creation
I-6 Can The Time Machine Be A Fact?
The Hypothesis Proves
I-7 The Proves Logic Analysis
I-8 Planet Velocity Is A Function In A Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-9 Planets Orbits Are Defined By A Motion Its Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-10 Jupiter distances are defined by a motion by a speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-11 The Solar System Geometrical Design Proves The Hypothesis
I-12 The Solar System Distances Analysis Prove The Hypothesis
I-13 Deep Analysis For The Planets Orbits
1-14 Light defines each planet orbital period
I-15 Can Planet Diameter Be Used As A Period Of Time
I-16 Mercury Orbit Analysis
I-17 The Planets Data Is Created By The Light Motion Directly
I-18 Light Defines Each Planet Rotation Period
I-1 Preface (The Main Idea)
The solar system (planets and distances) is created from one energy and this energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed (1.16 million km/s)
The space is created before the planets creation-
Let's write the whole story in following
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) started its motion from Mercury orbit moves toward Pluto orbit– by that– we consider Mercury orbit is the origin point-
Now- we should notice- No planet is created yet- the motion from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit defines the motion direction- and No planet is created before this motion end nor during this motion- the planets will be created after this motion is finished means when the light 1.16 million km per second reaches to Pluto (orbit)- after this event – the planets will be created –as I will explain later
Notice
The light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances by its motion- means- the light moves from Mercury point to Venus point– the distance from Mercury to Venus was not found and is created only by the light motion through it for first time- means – before the light motion this distance was NOT found- It's found after the light moves through this distance for first time-
This is similar to the blood motion through the arteries, the blood creates these arteries and the blood moves through these arteries, but the blood created these arteries with its first motion and that needed energy- but – after the arteries creation the blood move through them without any energy is required- means- the first motion is the most important one because by it the arteries are created
Shortly- The space is created from the energy of this light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second – NOW- after the Space creation- the light beam energy is decreased because of the energy consumption in the space creation process- and the rest energy is one light beam its speed is (C=300000 km/s =the light known speed) – But - We understand that- it's the same one light beam- its speed was 1.16 million km /s before the space creation- and the light created the space and that caused to consume the light energy and that caused to decrease the light speed to be 300000 km/s
Shortly- the light beam started its motion from Mercury (orbit) with speed 1.16 million km /s and reaches to Pluto (orbit) with a speed 300000 km/s because of the energy consumption in the space creation process
Let's give example to explain this idea
Imagine we create A Sea Of Water- we use energy to create this sea of water- now we have some energy and we use this energy to create this sea of water- BUT- our energy is NOT spent completely But there's a small part still rest with us – this small part of energy is used to create one wave moves through this sea and this wave speed is 300000 km/s (I suppose the space is similar to the sea of water)
Now – the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed 300000 km/s and this light beam is found NOW in Pluto Orbit – and this light beam will be reflected from Pluto orbit toward the inner planets– means- the rest energy will move in the reflected direction to the original light motion direction.
This idea will be explained in details in the next point- shortly
The light beam (300000 km/s) will be reflected from Pluto toward the inner planets
AND the light 300000 km/s will meet the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) in the origin point (in fact – beside the origin point) and there's a coherence of light is done between the light beam (300000 km/s) and the light beam (1.16 million km per second) – this coherence of light is proved strongly- we have to ask (how can that be possible while the light beam 1.16 million km /s is consumed and the new light beam 300000 km/s is the rest energy? how this light beam (300000 km/s) can meet the original one (1.16 million km per second)? in points no. (I-3) and no.(I-6) I answer this question.
Notice (1) I suppose the rest energy is a light beam its speed is (C=300000 km/s) but this idea is for simplicity- the rest energy can be in any wave form its speed (C=300000 km/s) – no necessity to be in visible light beam form
It's simply energy moves by the known speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
Notice (2)
All Planets Orbits Are Defined Before Any Planet Creation-
The light used the distance from the sun to Pluto as one area and create one geometrical design for this area before any planet creation
Notice (3)
The planets are created from the rest energy its speed (300000 km/s) – means- the space is created by the light 1.16 million km per second and the energy is consumed in the space creation and the rest energy is one light beam its speed 300000 km/s (or one wave moves by the known speed of light C=300000 km/s) – the solar planets are created from this one wave its speed 300000 km/s and that means all planets orbit are created and defined before any planet creation
Notice (4)
The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creations And Motions
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions energies total
The sun doesn't produce a gravitational field and doesn't have massive gravity
Logically – No planet moves by the sun gravity
(The Planet Moves With The Energy From Which The Planet Is Created – Newton is wrong- later we discuss the proves)
Notice (5)
The child (fetus) inside his mother is created by the blood motion- the blood motion creates arteries for this child and through these arteries the blood moves also but the arteries themselves are created by this same blood motion- Similar to that- the distances are created by the light motion energy and the light moves through these distances also but originally these distances themselves are created by the light motion energy- means the distances creation is done with the first time of the light motion through them - that required energy- but after the distances are created no more energy is required- the light (or planet) can pass simply through these distances
I-2 The Space Creation Method (the distances are one network)
Data
778.6 = 1.16 x 671
721 = 1.16 x 621
629 = 1.16 x 543
543 = 1.16 x 468
5906 = 1.16 x 5127
These numbers are distances in (million km)
778.6, 721, 671, 629, 551 are Jupiter distances to the sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars respectively- 5906 and 5127 Pluto distances to the sun and Jupiter respectively
468 = 936 /2 where (940 million km = the Earth orbital circumference)
Discussion
(1)
The previous data tells us how the light beam motion creates the distances-
Simply the light uses a distance as (a period of time) and travels through this period another distance- that can be understood clearly from Jupiter distances- let's look deeply as possible
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) uses the period 629 seconds to pass a new distance = 729 million km (Mercury Jupiter distance is 721 million km error 1%) – where 629 million km = Jupiter Earth distance
Also
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) uses the period 671 seconds to pas a new distance =778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance)
where 671 million km = Jupiter Venus distance
by this method the light creates the distances based on each other- and that makes all distances to be created depends on one another and that makes all distances in the solar system to be One Network where all distances are created based on the same One Geometrical Design
(2)
The data shows the creation method- and we understand that- the distance 551 million km (Jupiter Mars Distance) is created firstly and the light (1.16 mkm/s) used this distance as a period of time (551 sec) and the light travels during this period a distance =(639 million km where 629 million km is Jupiter Earth distance error 1.5%) and then the light uses the new distance (629 mkm) as a period of time (629 sec) and the light travels during this period a distance = (729 million km – where 721 million km = Mercury Jupiter distance – error 1%)
The data shows the method clearly and we understand the light original motion started from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit because the distances are created based on one another in that direction of motion as explained clearly
(3)
New data NO. (1)
2723 sec x 2 x 300000 km/s = 1622 million km – where
2723 million km = Uranus Earth Distance
1622 million km = Uranus Neptune Distance
The data shows- the light beam its speed (C=300000 km/s) is in proportionality also with the created distances but this proportionally is found in Reflected Direction
Logically, The light can NOT move from Uranus to Neptune and after that the light returns to move from Uranus to the Earth- it's simply reflected direction
The distances are NOT created by the motion of this light beam (300000 km/s) – but the distances are created by the motion of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) but the proportionality between the distances with the light (300000 km/s) is found because there's a proportionality between the original one (1.16 million km per second) and this light beam (300000 km/s) – AND
Because the light (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) that causes the proportionality between the distances and the light (300000 km/s) be in a reflected form
New data NO. (2)
2094 sec x 300000 km/s = 629 million km
2094 million km = Uranus Jupiter distance
629 million km = Earth Jupiter distance
The light (300000 km/s) moves in reflected direction- for that- the distance 2094 million km is used as a period of time to pass a new distance (629 mkm)
The data proves the idea clearly
Notice (1)
The proportionality between the light (1.16 million km/s) and the light (300000km/s) will be discussed in point no. (I-3)
Notice (2)
In Point (**) I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and I prove that – the planets motions energies move toward Pluto and this energy is reflected from Pluto toward Venus- this fact is proved by powerful data and proves- for that – I don't explain in details the light motion trajectory from Pluto toward the inner planets because this motion trajectory is studied in details in the hypothesis No. (2) of this discussion- understandable that- the planets motions energy trajectory is the same trajectory the light moves through it – means this trajectory is studied in details and powerful proves in point no. (**)
Notice (3)
Jupiter Distances Analysis shows that Jupiter orbit is the central orbit for the light (1.16 million km per second) based on which all planets orbits are defined.
But – this is not the first creation case –
The light (1.16 million km per second) created the planets orbits based on each other starting from Mercury orbit moves toward Pluto orbit – this is the fist creation case – and this fact is proved strongly in point no. (I-9*)
BUT
Mars had migrated from its original orbit (Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus) and Pluto had migrated also (Pluto Was The Mercury Moon revolves around Mercury and Pluto size was equal Mercury size)
The planets migration caused a serious risk for the solar system geometrical design- Uranus was the first planet tried to repair the solar system geometrical design and to save it- by that
Uranus created a vertical effect on Jupiter orbit to fix Jupiter in its orbit and prevent it to migrate with the migrant planets- and based on Jupiter orbit the other planets orbits are modified – that supported the solar system original design and saved it which causes to protect the geometrical design from the destruction.
As a result
That causes Jupiter orbit to be the most important orbit in the solar system- the paper third hypothesis explains the planets migration and Jupiter orbit analysis is done with the solar system design analysis (I-11*)
I-3 Light Coherence between light (1.16 million km /s) and light (300000 km/s)
(1)
The Coherence Of Light
The previous explanation told us that we have 2 light beams-
The original light beam its speed (1.16 million km per second) and it started its motion from Mercury orbit to Pluto orbit (where Mercury orbit is the light motion origin point) – and this light beam created all distances in the solar system and lost its energy in the space creation process and the rest energy is one light beam its speed is (C=300000 km/s)
The other light beam is the rest energy- its speed is (C=300000 km/s) and it moves in a reflected direction from Pluto toward Venus and Mercury-
Now – we have a coherence of light between these two light beams- the coherence is proved by powerful proves BUT firstly we have to ask (how can this coherence be occurred)? Because the original light (1.16 million km/s) is consumed and its energy is used already and the rest energy is this light its speed is (300000 km/s) - HOW can the light (1.16 million km/s) meet the light (300000 km/s)??
Imagine we have (116 dollars) and we spent all money except (30 dollars)- how can this (30 dollars) meet the original money (116 dollars)??
Let's write the answer
Suppose the light beam (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction (in the space) and also (in the time) – that can enable the light (300000 km/s) to meet the original one (1.16 million km/s) in the past and the coherence will be done there in the past- and we see the coherence results and effects on the solar system -
Means – the light (300000 km/s) moves into the past and found the original light (1.16 million km/s) in the past
Notice No. (1)
The original light beam (1.16 million km/s) can NOT move toward the future to meet the light (300000 km/s) because in the future the original light beam (1.16 million km/s) is NOT found –by that – the coherence can't be occurred in the future - But – the light (300000 km/s) can move into the past because this light beam (300000 km/s) was found in the past because it's a part of the original light beam (1.16 million km/s)
Notice no. (2)
I prove the coherence is done by powerful proves- that tells- this idea is a fact–means- there's a strong proof tells (in fact the light beam 300000 km/s moved into the past) and if we can use this feature practically we can get photos from the past events and by that we can have photos from the catastrophe which killed the dinosaurs and know much better about what had happened really in that time - This can be a real machine of time – the light motion into the past is a strong method to perform this invention.
Notice no. (3)
Why Can NOT We Move Into The Past As We Move Into The Future?
This question is answered in point no. (**)
(2)
The Light Coherence Proves
First Proof
The planets order is typical to the interference of Young –
In the double slits experiment, Young Interference is consisted of bright fringes and dark fringes - If we consider planet diameter is equivalent to bright fringe – we will see that- the planets order is typically to Young interference because
Jupiter (the greatest fringe) is in the middle and the fringes width is decreased gradually on both sides – typically to the planets order
Notice / I have proved that (Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus) if we restore Mars to its original orbit the order will be typical to the Young Interference
(I prove this fact in point no. **)
Second Proof
The planets velocities are defined based on the speed (1.16 million km per second) and the planets velocities analysis shows the speed (300000 km/s) is the planets motions limit- means- the planets velocities are defined based on both velocities (1.16 million km per second) and (300000 km/s) I prove this fact in point No. (**)
Third Proof
The light coherence defines the solar day period (24 hours) which is the solar system design cornerstone
(1.16 /0.3) x 2π = 24.3
By this equation the space and time are created- the equation tells–the space is created in curves (2π) and the time is created in units each unit is (24 hours)
Please note – the solar system geometrical design depends on the light motion in a solar day (24 hours = 86400 seconds)
The light (1.16 million km per second) moves in a solar day (86400 seconds) a distance = 100733 million km (= the planets orbital circumferences total)
Fourth Proof
The planets data prove there's a speed (1.16 million km per second) found in the solar system but the sun light beam moves by speed (300000 km/s) that tells the two speeds are facts and found in the solar system and the coherence between them is a logical result
The hypothesis proves discuss many powerful proves for this fact-
Notice- the coherence of light is a very important fact because it tells the light (300000 km/s) moved into the past and by that gives us a proof for the motion on the time axis- for that – many powerful proves support this fact.
I-4 The Matter definition (Based On My Planet Diameter Equation)
(1)
Let's remember my planet diameter equation
Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity
r = Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)
Example
Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8
89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
49528 km = Neptune diameter
9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination
(the equation is proved and discussed in details in point no. **)
(2)
Can We Define The Matter Nature Based On My Planet Diameter Equation?
The equation tells, the matter is created based on its motion! means Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s!!
That tells the motion with velocity 5.4 km/s is defined before Neptune diameter is created! Can we understand such definition for the matter nature? let's try
(A)
The Matter Nature
The space and matter are created from the same original energy and they move with this original energy motion- BUT the matter has a distinguish picture and different velocity from the space picture and velocity (notice- The Gravitational Waves Prove That The Space Has A Motion)
If we suppose the space is similar to the sea of water, the matter be similar to a whirlpool or a vortex found on the sea page- means- the matter is a geometrical design has a distinguish picture from the space- as the whirlpool, it's created from the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves picture
Means
The whirlpool is carried by the waves motion- and- the matter is carried by its original energy and moves with it- No Mass gravity is required for the matter motion- means- the matter is MOVABLE by nature.
Also
The whirlpool dimensions are defined by the water motion - for example- we have a whirlpool its diameter is (2 meters)- this diameter is defined by the sea water motion features (velocity, pressure and other motion features) by that- the water motion analysis explains how the whirlpool dimensions are created
Also- the whirlpool is created but the creation requirements are needed every day- means- even if this whirlpool is found since years it can be changed immediately if the water motion features are changed- means- the whirlpool creation process is NOT a historical one.
Also- the matter is similar to a creature muscle, the muscle is found based on the blood motion and without this motion the muscle can be changed or removed.
Shortly
The Original Energy Was Found In Motion By Itself (As Moving Light Beam)
From This Moving Energy The Planet Matter Is Created
The Created matter dimensions are defined by the features of this original energy motion (means the planet creation data is defined by the energy motion features)
After the planet creation- The Planet Moves With This Original Energy – means- the created planet moves a motion depending on the motion of this original energy because the planet moves with this original energy motion- and – the planet moves by this original energy motion (No mass gravity is required to cause the matter motion)
The planet creation data is in full harmony with its motion features- this fact is produced logically because the planet data is defined by the original energy motion features.
This explanation tells (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)
Example For Explanation
We agreed that the space is similar to the sea of water and the planet (matter) is similar to a whirlpool found on the sea page- this picture explains the idea clearly- because
We see the whirlpool doesn't move by the sea water waves velocity but by another velocity and that shows a distinguish in form and motion between the whirlpool (the planet) and the sea waves (the space)- BUT- the whirlpool dimensions are defined based on the sea water motion features- and if the motion features are changed the whirlpool dimensions will be changed also- also the whirlpool moves by the sea water motion even with a different velocity relative to the sea waves velocity but the whirlpool motion still is caused by the sea water motion- based on this picture we can say (because the water motion velocity is 80 km/h that causes this whirlpool diameter to be 2 meters "for example') – this is perfectly our sentence – let's remember it
(because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s that causes Neptune diameter to be 49528 km)
This idea is proved by my planet diameter equation (my fourth equation) (point No.**)
(B)
Now The velocity is a motion in (A Defined Direction)
Means– the matter is created because it depends on a motion in a defined direction- as we have seen- Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s but this velocity is a motion in defined direction- and that tells Neptune creation depends on a motion in the direction of the (x axis positive "+x ") (for example)
That tells, if this motion moves in (x axis negative "-x ") that will cause Neptune diameter to be changed or perished
Means- the matter creation needs a motion in A Defined Direction
Now let's ask our question
Why Can't The matter (creature) Moves Toward Its Past?
Because the matter depends on a motion in one defined direction- that causes the matter moves into (the future) always and can't move into (the past) let's discuss this question more deeply in point no (I-6)
Notice
No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity (Newton is wrong) – logically because- the planet moves by its creation force- means- the planet creation and motion should be done by one force only (one energy only) because if two forces have effects on the same one planet- this planet will be broken- this fact is proved strongly with the gravitational waves source discussion (Point no.**)
I-5 The Planets Creation
I summarize the main idea in following and the idea proves and discussions are found in point no. (**)
(i)
We know, the solar system is created from energy of one light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- and – the light created the space (the planets orbits) firstly and the energy is consumed in the space creation- and for that- the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is 300000 km/s - And
From this light beam 300000 km/s the solar planets are created
Shortly
before the solar planets creation
The solar system was one light beam (or one wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s)- by that – the solar system is One Wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s)
Now
The Solar System needs To Create A Stationary Point Its velocity Zero relative to the moving one wave (300000 km/s)
This is the basic information in the solar system design-
The solar system needs to create a stationary point relative to the wave motion- by that – two velocities will be found which are (v1= the wave its speed 300000 km/s) and (v2= Zero= the stationary point velocity relative to the wave motion)–these two velocities produce a relative motion with different velocity 300000 km/s– this relative motion is the solar system design cornerstone.
Shortly – the solar system needs to create A Stationary Point
Notice– The solar system is carried by the light beam motion, NO stationary point can be found here – it's similar to a ship on the sea water- Nothing can stop- because the motion is done forcedly by the sea water –
The stationary point will be similar to the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- BUT
The solar system needs to create this stationary point - Now – let's try to create this stationary point in following - The solar system uses two procedures to do that,
(ii)
The first procedure
The wave its velocity 300000 km/s revolves around a point in space (any point in space), the revolution motion creates 2 equal velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value and opposite in direction- their total be equal Zero-means- the revolution motion creates A Stationary Point in the center of the revolution.
The second procedure
The previous idea is correct- but –the velocity 300000 km/s is a huge one and to decrease it to Zero velocity this is a complex process– for that- the wave (300000 km/s) created small waves with low velocities to use them as steps to decrease the velocity to Zero- the small waves are The Planets- (The planet is a small wave moves by low velocity relative to the original wave its velocity 300000 km/s)
Why Are These Small Waves Required?
Because the velocity 300000 km/s is decreased to Zero by using these small waves and their low velocities- the low velocities are used as steps to decrease the unified wave velocity (300000 km/s) to be (Zero)- this process decreases the velocity gradually from 300000 km/s to Zero depending on these small waves velocities (the planets velocities)
Means- the planets are created for this process to decrease the wave velocity from 300000 km/s to Zero- and The Planet Is A Small Wave Moves By Low Velocity
Shortly – the solar system has one complete system of velocities, Starting from Zero to 300000 km/s where the planets velocities are the steps between the two velocities – let's prove that here
(iii)
300000 km = 7.1 x (205.8)^2 where
7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect for speed 297000 km/s (99% of speed of light)
205.8 km/s = the 9 planets velocities total (176 km/s) + the Earth moon velocity
(The moon velocity =29.8 km/s = the Earth velocity because they revolve together)
Why does the data use the squared value (205.8)^2?
We know the answer- but - Let's remember it
The planets are geometrical points on the same light beam and move with its motion- for that- the planets velocities rates creates rates of time– for example- Mercury velocity = 1.6 the Earth velocity- that means – one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock- Why??
Because Mercury and the Earth are carried by the same one light beam- the light moves one motion and passes one distance in one period of time- by that Mercury and the Earth have to move this same motion and to pass this same distance in this same period of time- but the two planets velocities are different- for that- the planets use different rates of time based on their velocities rates and by that the planets move equal distances in the same period of time –
Now- the velocity (205.8 km/s) moves relative to the stationary point (Zero) and creates a rate of time (1 second = 205.8 seconds) –
(one second of the unified wave clock = 205.8 seconds of the stationary point clock)
But – the energy is reflected in the solar system (I prove that in point no.**),
The energy reflection reflects the players – means
(one second of the stationary point clock = 205.8 seconds of the unified wave clock)
The stationary point will be THE SUN – by that
(one second of the sun clock = 205.8 seconds of the unified wave clock) – means
(one second of the sun clock = 205.8 seconds of any planet clock) –
Now during one second of the sun clock, the wave clock needs 205.8 seconds while the wave moves by a velocity 205.8 km/s- means –
During one second of the sun clock, the wave moves 42253 km = 300000 km /7.1
That creates the different velocity 300000 km/s between the sun motion and the wave motion-
Notice 1
The wave (205.8 km/s) moves during 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km, and we know the Earth cycle (1461 days = 365 +365 +365 +366)
That tells, the speed of light (300000 km/s) is performed by the rate of time and that causes to create the Earth cycle-
Notice 2
Planet velocity is created by the rate of time- means- if no rate of time can be used – No planet velocity can be created – instead- all motions will be only by speed of light (300000 km/s)- the planet can create a small velocity because it can use rate of time
We realize that clearly because
The planets motions depend on the light motion- by that – the motion is done by One Motor only which moves by speed of light (300000 km/s), the planets can only move by speed of light or create a rate of time for their smaller velocities - No more options are provided.
Notice 3
We understand that, the planets are geometrical points on the same light beam, means
The planets are similar to carriages in one train and the light motion is the train engine means the planets are carried on the light beam and move with this light motion
I-6 Can The Time Machine Be A Fact?
To answer this question we need to review basics facts we have studied – let's do that in following
(1)
The solar system is created from one energy and this energy is provided by one light beam
(2)
The light moves simply and freely in any direction (for space) and (for time)- means- the light can move into the future (as matter does) or into the past (which the matter can Not do)
(3)
We know, the solar system is created from one light beam, and this light moves by a speed (1.16 million km per second) - And
We know, the light (1.16 million km per second) created the planets orbits firstly before any planet creation and the energy is consumed in the space creation and because of the energy consumption the light speed is decreased from (1.16 million km per second) to the known speed of light 300000 km/s – also
We know, the light (1.16 million km per second) started its motion from Mercury orbit moves toward Pluto- that means- the light (1.16 million km per second) started from Mercury orbit with speed (1.16 million km per second) and the light created all planets orbits till Pluto orbit- before any planet creation- and by that- the light lost its energy and the light beam in Pluto orbit reduced its speed to be 300000 km/s as a result for the energy consumption in the space creation process
(4)
Also we know the energy is reflected from Pluto toward Venus (the inner planets)
By that the light beam (300000 km/s) moves in the reflected direction to the original light beam (its speed 1.16 million km per second)
And – we know-
The light beam (300000 km/s) reaches to the original point (Mercury Orbit) from which the light (1.16 million km per second) started its motion
And we know that
A coherence of light is done between the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) and the light beam (300000 km/s)
BUT we don't know how such coherence can be occurred? Let's analyze that deeply in following
(5)
The produced light beam (300000 km/s) moves in (the reflected direction) to the direction of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) (In Space) and reaches to Mercury orbit (the origin point)
But– logically – the produced light beam (300000 km/s) can NOT find the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) there because the original light beam is consumed already in the space creation process and the rest energy is this produced light beam (300000 km/s) – based on that –
How Can This Coherence Be Occurred? Means-
How can the produced light beam (300000 km/s) meet the original light beam (1.16 million km per second)? The answer is
The produced light beam (300000 km/s) moves (in the reflected direction) to the motion direction of the original light beam (1.16 million km per second) (In Space) and (In Time) Means- the produced light beam moves into (Its Own Past) and in the past this produced light beam (300000 km/s) was (A Part of the original light beam 1.16 million km per second) and because of that the produced light beam (300000 km/s) can meet the original light beam (1.16 million km per second),
And
The two light beams create a coherence (in the past) and we see the results of this coherence in our present time-
The idea is very important because – the coherence of the two light beams (1.16 mkm/s and 0.3 mkm/s) is proved strongly and with powerful proves and any explanation for this coherence will prove that the produced light beam (300000 km/s) must move Into The Past to enable this coherence occurrence- and that tells clearly- the travel through the time is possible and fact
BUT
Can the matter moves into its past as the light does? NO
Why?? Because
We know the light can move simply in any direction (+ x, + y, + z, + t) by that the light can move into the future and can move into the past BUT
The matter creation depends on A Motion In A Defined Direction-
let's remember this idea
Neptune diameter =49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s
(This Fact Is Proved By My Planet Diameter Equation)
Now, Neptune velocity is a motion in a defined direction
(for example a motion in +x direction)
The energy moves in this direction (+x direction) and because of this motion Neptune matter is created and Neptune diameter is defined- now if the energy moves in (opposite direction "–x direction") that will change Neptune diameter or cause to perish its matter at all
Means- as long as – Neptune is found- that means – the energy moves in one direction (and not two directions) – for that Neptune can move into the future but can NOT move into the past.
Notice
The matter can not move into the past but the light can do that-
Means- we have the time machine already- we need to know how to send the light into the past and by that we can have photos from the past events- and this will be The Time Machine
The Hypothesis Proves
I-7 The Proves Logic Analysis
I-8 Planet Velocity Is A Function In A Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-9 Planets Orbits Are Defined By A Motion Its Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-10 Jupiter distances are defined by a motion by a speed = (1.16 million km /s)
I-11 The Solar System Geometrical Design Proves The Hypothesis
I-12 The Solar System Distances Analysis Prove The Hypothesis
I-13 Deep Analysis For The Planets Orbits
1-14 Light defines each planet orbital period
I-15 Can Planet Diameter Be Used As A Period Of Time?
I-16 Mercury Orbit Analysis
I-17 The Planets Data Is Created By The Light Motion Directly
I-18 Light Defines Each Planet Rotation Period
I-7 The Proves Logic Analysis
Why can we prove that, a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second is found in the solar system? also, the theory tells this light beam energy is consumed and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed 300000 km/s (the known speed of light), if this light energy is consumed, how can we prove its existence?
There are two major reasons, which are
The Planets Orbits Are Created Before Any Planet Creation- And These Orbits Are Created Based On One Motion- And This One Motion Is Done By A Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second.
The Planets Matters Are Created Based On Their Orbits – means- the planet is similar to a tree and the orbit is similar to a ground and the tree is planted in the ground-
NOTICE
after the planet creation, the planet can migrate from its original orbit to any other orbit - as Mars and Pluto did and that will not cause to destroy the planet.
Shortly-
the planet matter and data is created based on this planet orbit- the orbit is defined before any planet creation and based on the orbit the planet matter and data is created (we remember- the space is similar to the sea of water and the planet matter is similar to a whirlpool found on this sea page- that tells the whirlpool is created based on its place in the sea of water)
Shortly- The Planet Matter Is Created Depends On This Planet Orbit
The speed 1.16 million km per second is registered in the planets orbits because the orbits are created from the energy of the light beam (1.16 million km per second), and the planet matter is created from this planet orbit (energy)
Shortly
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) is the source of energy for (everything) in the solar system-
All orbits are defined by its energy, all matters are created by its energy, and all motions are done by its motion-
Can we prove this light beam is a fact? YES we can
The analysis for any data or any motion will discover this light beam because it's the source of energy for everything
Shortly
the light beam (1.16 million km per second) is The Source Energy of the solar system
The mother of all children can be discovered by analysis these children data
A QUESTION
Can the solar system design uses a rate 1.16 and I can't understand that but wrongly consider this rate (1.16) as a speed of light 1.16 million km per second?
NO- this can't be possible – Because
The light beam (1.16 million km per second) behaves typically to the known light beam (300000 km/s) – as we will see in the data discussion
I-8 Planet Velocity Is A Function In A Speed = (1.16 million km /s)
DATA
My 5th equation (v1v2=322)- the planets velocities prove it–let's see that in following
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)
322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)
DATA ANALYSIS
The previous data tells the planets velocities are defined by three features
(1st Feature)
The planets velocities are complementary one another –means - each planet velocity is complementary with another planet velocity– means– The planets velocities are defined in pairs and not in single planets.
(Notice, the inner planets orbital inclinations are defined by the rule (v1/v2), for example, Mercury orbital inclination 7 deg = Mercury velocity 47.4/ Uranus velocity 6.8 that proves the effect of the rule (v1v2=322) on the planet motion)
Ceres velocity tells the idea - Ceres is used as the main point - as a result the outer planets be complementary with the inner planets – for that the rule (v1v2=322) controls the planets velocities- that means- The planets velocities are created based on One Design- Ceres velocity is used as the main point for this design
(2nd Feature)
Why the constant is 322? because 1160000 seconds = 322 hours – means- there's speed of light = 1.16 million km /s - Shortly
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during 6.8 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 47.4 hours a distance = 1160000 km And
Venus (35 km/s) moves during 2 x 4.7 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 35 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during 2 x 5.4 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 2 x 29.8 hours a distance = 1160000 km And
Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during 13.1 hours a distance = 1160000 km
Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 24.1 hours a distance = 1160000 km And
(Notice - Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 33.2 hours a distance = 1160000 km - (between 33.2 and Venus velocity 35 km/s the error 5%)) (Data Max error 2%)
The Data Proves, The Planets Velocities Are Functions In The Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second. That proves the speed (1.16 million km per second) is A Fact
(notice the planets velocities are complementary one another also based on the known speed of light 300000 km/s, the paper provides this data)
(3rd Feature)
The planets velocities limit depend on the known speed of light 300000 km/s
Let's explain that in following
The 9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s (I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s)
The 10 planets velocities total is 205.8 km/s
300000 km = 7.1 x (205.8)^2
The speed 297000 km/s (99% speed of light) causes Lorentz length contraction effect with the rate 7.1
The velocity (205.8 km/s) moves during 205.8 seconds a distance 42253 km
Where 300000 = 7.1 x 42253 km BUT 42253 = (205.8)^2
The squared value (205.8)^2 is found because of the used rate of time
We have studied this equation in point (I-5**) -the data shows, the planets velocities are defined as parts of a complete system of velocities starts from (Zero = stationary point) and reaches to the speed of light 300000 km/s and between these two values the planets velocities are defined to support this same system- that tells- the planets velocities are defined with limit to the speed of light (300000 km/s) - The data proves the speed (1.16 million km per second) is a fact -and also the data proves the coherence is done between the light (1.16 million km per second) and the light (300000 km/s)
(CONT)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c
E-mail [email protected], [email protected]
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
PUBLICATIONS
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
#architecture#audit#batteries#Building#buildings#Capture#carbon#carbon capture#career#Careers#challenge#change#Civil and environmental engineering#classes#Classes and programs#climate#climate change#Community#Companies#comprehensive#creativity#decarbonization#deployment#Design#details#Electric grid#electricity#emerging technologies#Emissions#energy
0 notes
Text
Students research pathways for MIT to reach decarbonization goals
New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/students-research-pathways-for-mit-to-reach-decarbonization-goals/
Students research pathways for MIT to reach decarbonization goals
A number of emerging technologies hold promise for helping organizations move away from fossil fuels and achieve deep decarbonization. The challenge is deciding which technologies to adopt, and when.
MIT, which has a goal of eliminating direct campus emissions by 2050, must make such decisions sooner than most to achieve its mission. That was the challenge at the heart of the recently concluded class 4.s42 (Building Technology — Carbon Reduction Pathways for the MIT Campus).
The class brought together undergraduate and graduate students from across the Institute to learn about different technologies and decide on the best path forward. It concluded with a final report as well as student presentations to members of MIT’s Climate Nucleus on May 9.
“The mission of the class is to put together a cohesive document outlining how MIT can reach its goal of decarbonization by 2050,” says Morgan Johnson Quamina, an undergraduate in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. “We’re evaluating how MIT can reach these goals on time, what sorts of technologies can help, and how quickly and aggressively we’ll have to move. The final report details a ton of scenarios for partial and full implementation of different technologies, outlines timelines for everything, and features recommendations.”
The class was taught by professor of architecture Christoph Reinhart but included presentations by other faculty about low- and zero-carbon technology areas in their fields, including advanced nuclear reactors, deep geothermal energy, carbon capture, and more.
The students’ work served as an extension of MIT’s Campus Decarbonization Working Group, which Reinhart co-chairs with Director of Sustainability Julie Newman. The group is charged with developing a technology roadmap for the campus to reach its goal of decarbonizing its energy systems.
Reinhart says the class was a way to leverage the energy and creativity of students to accelerate his group’s work.
“It’s very much focused on establishing a vision for what could happen at MIT,” Reinhart says. “We are trying to bring these technologies together so that we see how this [decarbonization process] would actually look on our campus.”
A class with impact
Throughout the semester, every Thursday from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., around 20 students gathered to explore different decarbonization technology pathways. They also discussed energy policies, methods for evaluating risk, and future electric grid supply changes in New England.
“I love that this work can have a real-world impact,” says Emile Germonpre, a master’s student in the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering. “You can tell people aren’t thinking about grades or workload — I think people would’ve loved it even if the workload was doubled. Everyone is just intrinsically motivated to help solve this problem.”
The classes typically began with an introduction to one of 10 different technologies. The introductions covered technical maturity, ease of implementation, costs, and how to model the technology’s impact on campus emissions. Students were then split into teams to evaluate each technology’s feasibility.
“I’ve learned a lot about decarbonization and climate change,” says Johnson Quamina. “As an undergrad, I haven’t had many focused classes like this. But it was really beneficial to learn about some of these technologies I hadn’t even heard of before. It’s awesome to be contributing to the community like this.”
As part of the class, students also developed a model that visualizes each intervention’s effect on emissions, allowing users to select interventions or combinations of interventions to see how they shape emissions trajectories.
“We have a physics-based model that takes into account every building,” says Reinhart. “You can look at variants where we retrofit buildings, where we add rooftop photovoltaics, nuclear, carbon capture, and adopting different types of district underground heating systems. The point is you can start to see how fast we could do something like this and what the real game-changers are.”
The class also designed and conducted a preliminary survey, to be expanded in the fall, that captures the MIT community’s attitudes towards the different technologies. Preliminary results were shared with the Climate Nucleus during students’ May 9 presentations.
“I think it’s this unique and wonderful intersection of the forward-looking and innovative nature of academia with real world impact and specificity that you’d typically only find in industry,” Germonpre says. “It lets you work on a tangible project, the MIT campus, while exploring technologies that companies today find too risky to be the first mover on.”
From MIT’s campus to the world
The students recommended MIT form a building energy team to audit and retrofit all campus buildings. They also suggested MIT order a comprehensive geological feasibility survey to support planning regarding shallow and deep borehole fields for harvesting underground heat. A third recommendation was to communicate with the MIT community as well as with regulators and policymakers in the area about the deployment of nuclear batteries and deep geothermal boreholes on campus.
The students’ modeling tool can also help members of the working group explore various decarbonization pathways. For instance, installing rooftop photovoltaics now would effectively reduce emissions, but installing them in a few decades, when the regional electricity grid is expected to be reducing its reliance on fossil fuels anyways, would have a much smaller impact.
“When you have students working together, the recommendations are a little less filtered, which I think is a good thing,” Reinhart says. “I think there’s a real sense of urgency in the class. For certain choices, we have to basically act now.”
Reinhart plans to do more activities related to the Working Group and the class’ recommendations in the fall, and he says he’s currently engaged with the Massachusetts Governor’s Office to explore doing something similar for the state.
Students say they plan to keep working on the survey this summer and continue studying their technology areas. In the longer term, they believe the experience will help them in their careers.
“Decarbonization is really important, and understanding how we can implement new technologies on campuses or in buildings provides me with a more well-rounded vision for what I could design in my career,” says Johnson Quamina, who wants to work as a structural or environmental engineer but says the class has also inspired her to consider careers in energy.
The students’ findings also have implications beyond MIT campus. In accordance with MIT’s 2015 climate plan that committed to using the campus community as a “test bed for change,” the students’ recommendations also hold value for organizations around the world.
“The mission is definitely broader than just MIT,” Germonpre says. “We don’t just want to solve MIT’s problem. We’ve dismissed technologies that were too specific to MIT. The goal is for MIT to lead by example and help certain technologies mature so that we can accelerate their impact.”
#architecture#audit#batteries#Building#buildings#Capture#carbon#carbon capture#career#Careers#challenge#change#Civil and environmental engineering#classes#Classes and programs#climate#climate change#Community#Companies#comprehensive#creativity#decarbonization#deployment#Design#details#Electric grid#electricity#emerging technologies#Emissions#energy
0 notes
Text
youtube
A failed audition that I thought was fun!
0 notes
Text
How to Reduce Your Business Carbon Footprint with Energy Audits
In today's rapidly changing world, where every footprint counts, businesses are faced with an extraordinary challenge and opportunity – the power to reduce their carbon footprint. It's not merely a corporate responsibility; it's a call to transform, innovate, and thrive sustainably. One transformative tool in this journey is the energy audit. In this blog, we'll embark on an enlightening exploration of energy audits, unraveling how they can empower your business to shrink its carbon footprint while boosting its financial health.
Understanding Energy Audits
Defining Energy Audits
An energy audit is a meticulous examination of a building, facility, or process designed to uncover opportunities for enhancing energy efficiency. It entails a thorough assessment of energy utilization across the business spectrum, encompassing everything from lighting and heating to the intricacies of manufacturing processes and the operation of equipment. The ultimate objective is to precisely identify areas where energy is squandered and to craft effective strategies for curbing energy consumption.
The Purpose and Benefits of Energy Audits
The primary purpose of an energy audit is to identify ways to reduce energy consumption, lower energy costs, and minimize the environmental impact associated with energy use. By conducting energy audits, businesses can achieve several significant benefits:
1. Cost Savings: Energy is a substantial operational expense for most businesses. Energy audits can reveal cost-effective measures to reduce energy consumption, leading to lower utility bills and increased profitability.
2. Environmental Impact Reduction: One of the most pressing global challenges is reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Energy audits contribute to this goal by identifying energy-saving opportunities, which in turn reduces a business's carbon footprint.
3. Improved Operational Efficiency: Energy audits can uncover equipment inefficiencies and maintenance needs, leading to improved overall operational efficiency. This not only reduces energy consumption but can also enhance productivity and competitiveness.
Types of Energy Audits
Energy audits come in various forms, each suited to different levels of detail and complexity:
1. Preliminary Audit: This is a high-level assessment that provides a rough estimate of potential energy savings. It's a quick and cost-effective way to identify obvious energy efficiency opportunities.
2. Walk-Through Audit: A walk-through audit involves a site visit and a more detailed evaluation of energy use. It provides a better understanding of energy consumption patterns and identifies potential improvements.
3. Comprehensive Audit: A comprehensive audit is an in-depth analysis of energy use, involving data collection, measurement, and analysis. It provides a thorough understanding of energy consumption and identifies precise energy-saving measures.
The Energy Audit Process
Steps Involved in Conducting an Energy Audit
Conducting an energy audit involves a structured process to ensure comprehensive evaluation and effective energy-saving recommendations. Here are the key steps:
1. Gathering Historical Energy Data: The first step is to collect and analyze historical energy consumption data. This provides a baseline against which energy-saving improvements can be measured.
2. On-Site Inspection: An on-site inspection is crucial to assess the current state of energy use. Auditors examine equipment, systems, and operations to identify inefficiencies and potential improvements.
3. Identifying Energy-Saving Opportunities: Based on the data and observations, auditors pinpoint energy-saving opportunities. These can include upgrading equipment, improving insulation, optimizing lighting, and more.
4. Calculating Potential Energy Savings: Auditors calculate the potential energy and cost savings associated with each identified opportunity. This helps prioritize which measures to implement.
5. Developing an Energy-Saving Action Plan: A comprehensive energy audit results in a detailed action plan. This plan outlines the recommended energy-saving measures, estimated savings, and a timeline for implementation.
The Importance of Hiring a Qualified Energy Auditor
To ensure accurate and meaningful results, it's crucial to hire a qualified energy auditor or engage a reputable energy audit firm. Qualified auditors have the knowledge and expertise to perform detailed assessments, make accurate recommendations, and provide guidance on implementation.
Employee Involvement and Awareness
Effective energy audits go beyond the technical aspects; they also involve employees. It's essential to engage employees in the process, raise awareness about energy efficiency, and encourage their participation in implementing recommended changes. This can foster a culture of sustainability within the organization.
Benefits of Energy Audits for Businesses
Cost Savings
Reducing energy consumption directly translates into cost savings. By implementing the energy-saving measures identified in an audit, businesses can significantly lower their utility bills. For example, upgrading to energy-efficient lighting, optimizing HVAC systems, and reducing equipment idle time can lead to substantial cost reductions.
Real-world examples illustrate the potential for cost savings. Take a manufacturing facility, for instance, that identified and implemented energy-efficient equipment and lighting upgrades. The result? A 20% reduction in energy costs, amounting to thousands of dollars in annual savings.
Environmental Impact Reduction
Businesses have a social responsibility to reduce their carbon footprint and minimize their impact on the environment. Energy audits play a pivotal role in achieving this goal. By identifying areas where energy is wasted and implementing energy-efficient measures, businesses can significantly reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. This not only benefits the planet but also enhances a company's reputation as an environmentally responsible entity.
Improved Operational Efficiency
Operational efficiency is a key driver of profitability and competitiveness. Energy audits help improve operational efficiency by identifying equipment upgrades and maintenance needs. For example, by addressing equipment that is running below peak efficiency or optimizing manufacturing processes, businesses can reduce energy consumption while simultaneously improving productivity.
Conclusion In conclusion, energy audits are a valuable tool for businesses looking to reduce their carbon footprint and enhance their financial sustainability. By understanding the energy audit process, recognizing the benefits, and taking action to implement recommended measures, businesses can position themselves as environmentally responsible leaders in their industries. Energy audits not only save money but also contribute to a greener and more sustainable future for us all. So, if your business hasn't yet considered an energy audit, it's time to start the journey towards a more sustainable and profitable future.
Elevate your property's energy efficiency with VertPro.com, your one-stop solution for Commercial Energy Audits, Benchmark Compliance consultancy, and our cutting-edge Construction Marketplace. As industry pioneers, VertPro empowers Building Owners and Property Managers nationwide with innovative SaaS technology-based solutions. From Energy Benchmarking to Energy Audits/RCx Plus, we ensure compliance with over 50 Energy Benchmarking and Energy Efficiency Laws.
Don't miss out on maximizing your property's energy potential and value. Explore VertPro.com's comprehensive solutions today, and let us help you unlock the transformation your property deserves.
0 notes
Text
A Global Perspective: How Different Countries Approach Carbon Auditing and Reporting
In a global effort to cohesively combat climate change, the process of gaining carbon audits and reports serves as crucial mechanisms in the reduction and tracking of GHG emissions. When nations strive to meet climate targets internationally, like that in the Paris Agreement, the frameworks and strategies employed in auditing and reporting can also vary significantly.
European Union
The EU is seen as a leader in climate regulation, where the ETS or EU’s Emission Trading Systems is the cornerstone of Europe’s policy to be combating climate change. It is a cost-effective tool for the reduction of successful greenhouse gas emissions. Covering over 11000 manufacturing plants and power stations in 27 member states in the EU, and emissions from airlines that fly between the countries. EU mandates large companies to publish regular social and environmental reports, including detailed accounts of carbon emissions. This need promotes transparency and encourages organizations to develop processes for reducing carbon footprints. The “Green Deal from EU” will aim to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050, thereby tightening expectations and regulations for carbon audits.
The United States
The United States has a less centralized process for carbon auditing or reporting than the EU. There is no mandatory scheme of carbon trading or national carbon tax, but some states like California pioneer aggressive climactic policies. For instance, the “California Cap-and Trade” 2013 program, has been one of the largest carbon trading programs worldwide. It covered 85% of the total GHG emissions of the state. The EPA or “Environmental Protection Agency” needs to report GHG emissions from large suppliers and sources in the USA through the GHG reporting program. However, this is a more decentralized approach with unique variations on how individual states can report and manage emissions.
India
India strongly focuses on increasing the capacity for renewable energy and overall energy efficiency. The NAPCC or “National Action Plan on Climate Change” displays eight national missions that run through 2017-20, focusing on the promotion of sustainable development. Although India does not possess a mandatory GHG emissions report system across all industries, it operates a PAT scheme (called Perform, Achieve & Trade) under the national mission for enhanced energy efficiency. The market-based PAT scheme enhances cost-effectiveness as well as energy efficiency across sectors. Third-party audits and voluntary reporting should be encouraged, where an increased number of Indian organizations participate in projects of global carbon disclosure.
China
China has been the world’s largest emitter of CO2 but has made considerable strides in carbon audits and reports in recent years. In 2021 the country had launched a national trading scheme, focusing on the sector of power generation. The scheme has the expected expansion to include more industries to peak emissions before 2030 while achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. China shows heavy investment in technologies around renewable energy which reduces its rapidly growing economy’s carbon intensity. The government mandates GHG emissions and energy audits which report for key industries, thus integrating collated efforts into a national framework that would support long-term objectives of the climate.
Conclusion
The Carbon audit and report reflect diverse political wills, economic priorities, as well as environmental challenges. The trading schemes of the EU to the decentralized strategies of the USA, and the emerging frameworks in China and India, every country contributes uniquely to the collected effort of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. The national strategies not only aim to meet international climate commitments but also foster innovation, and encourage private and public sectors to participate actively in global climate change. As the world continues to face and evolve new environmental challenges, the effectiveness and adaptability of the carbon auditing and reporting frameworks will shape a sustainable future.
1 note
·
View note
Text
What is net zero and what is its significance?
The concept of "net zero" has gained increasing attention in recent years as the world grapples with the pressing issue of climate change. Put simply, "net zero" refers to a state where greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are balanced by removals or reductions in an effort to achieve a neutral carbon footprint. In other words, the amount of GHG emissions released into the atmosphere is equal to the amount removed or offset, resulting in no net increase in GHG concentrations in the atmosphere.
The concept of "net zero" is essential because climate change is one of the most significant threats facing our planet today. GHG emissions, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), trap heat in the atmosphere, causing the earth's temperature to rise. This rise in temperature leads to a range of environmental impacts, including more frequent and severe natural disasters, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, and changes in precipitation patterns. These changes, in turn, have far-reaching consequences for human health, economies, and the natural world.
By achieving net-zero emissions, we can significantly reduce the impact of climate change. This is because achieving net zero helps to limit the number of additional GHGs that enter the atmosphere, reducing the rate of temperature increase and associated environmental impacts. Furthermore, the process of achieving net zero can also provide a range of additional benefits, such as improved air quality, enhanced energy security, and increased economic opportunities.
To achieve net zero, it is necessary to reduce GHG emissions as much as possible through a combination of measures. This may include using renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydropower to power homes and businesses, improving energy efficiency to reduce energy consumption, and switching to low-carbon transportation options such as electric vehicles. In addition to reducing emissions, it is also essential to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through natural processes such as afforestation, reforestation, and soil carbon sequestration or through technology-driven approaches such as direct air capture.
Achieving net zero will require significant effort and cooperation from governments, businesses, and individuals worldwide. This is because GHG emissions are a global problem, and the impacts of climate change affect us all. Governments have a crucial role to play in creating policies and regulations that incentivize the adoption of low-carbon technologies and practices, as well as providing funding for research and development in this area. Businesses must also take responsibility for reducing their carbon footprint by implementing sustainable practices, such as reducing energy consumption and using renewable energy sources.
Individuals also have a crucial role to play in achieving net zero. By making small changes to our daily lives, such as using energy-efficient appliances, reducing our meat consumption, and driving less, we can all contribute to reducing GHG emissions. Moreover, by demanding that our governments and businesses take action to address climate change, we can create the necessary momentum for change.
One of the most significant challenges to achieving net zero is the need for collective action. Achieving net zero requires a global effort, with all nations working together to reduce their emissions and increase their use of renewable energy sources. This is particularly challenging given the diverse needs and priorities of different countries, as well as the political and economic barriers that can stand in the way of change. However, there is growing recognition that tackling climate change is a global responsibility and that all nations must work together to achieve the necessary reductions in GHG emissions.
In conclusion, achieving net zero is a crucial step in the fight against climate change. We can limit the rate of temperature rise and its associated environmental impacts by reducing GHG emissions and removing carbon from the atmosphere. Achieving net zero will require significant effort and cooperation from governments, businesses, and individuals worldwide, but the benefits of doing so are clear. By taking action to address climate change, we can protect our planet. For more information and service, contact https://www.appliedenergy.ca/.
#Carbon Neutral#energy modelling#energy audits#energy financing#energy management#climate change#carbon#greenhouse gas#hvac
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Energy Efficiency Funds: 3 Prime Reasons for Its Popularity
Energy optimisation suggests maximising the way you are using it in your respective environment. This goes far beyond the simple concept of energy saving, rather it puts greater emphasis on expanding energy efficiency in the space you are already in. This can help you directly by improving the performance of your devices by not overusing them. Similarly, energy efficiency grants act as a great boon to the business.
youtube
What Is Energy Efficiency Funding?
It is a special financing option that enables the business personnel to work in alliance with beneficial funding options so that there is a development of eco-friendly energy. This saves overall energy, bringing positive environmental impact in the surrounding. The presence of several good reasons to consider it as a great source of conservation of energy. It has been a serious term that is taken into consideration among all the business industries in the world. This will not only be beneficial for the present generation, but will also help the future generation to lead a comfortable life.
Beneficial Reasons Why It Is Important to Optimise Energy Use?
Protect the Environment
The option acts as a great way to bring down the carbon footprint and reduce other harmful emissions. This can enhance the surrounding environmental conditions that can bring a dramatic change.
Significantly Reduce your Utility Bills
Energy costs can make up a remarkable portion of your recurring monthly expenses. The use of energy-efficient steps and equipment in this aspect can cut unnecessary costs to a great extent.
Earn a Great Return on your Investment
Purchases based on energy efficiency should be taken as a matter of investment over expense. Furthermore, it can return your pocket through significant savings too.
Final Thoughts
Look for the most reliable provider of energy efficiency grant options. Contact the best to have the best experiences.
#energy efficiency grants#energy efficiency funding#low carbon emission#energy audit service#Youtube
0 notes
Photo
Day 3341 - Had a free energy audit today courtesy of Mass Save. Definitely recommend if you’re a Massachusetts resident! (It looks like they do even offer what advice they can for renters)
0 notes
Text
WCS Environmental Engineering: Expert Environmental Consulting and Engineering Services
WCS Environmental Engineering offers customized environmental consulting and engineering services to clients across the globe. Our team of experts provides tailored solutions in sustainability, regulatory compliance, and more. Contact us today! WCS Environmental Engineering is a company that specializes in providing environmental consulting and engineering services to clients across the globe.…
View On WordPress
#carbon footprint#energy audits#environmental consulting#environmental engineering#regulatory compliance#sustainability#waste management#water treatment
0 notes
Text
Is there garlic on this pizza? An oral history of Supernatural's 'Monster Movie' episode
THE BEGINNING
What started as a simple enough idea — a black-and-white episode — was then put into the hands of writer Ben Edlund, who’d already crafted some of the show’s more creative hours, including “Hollywood Babylon,” which marked one of the series’ first meta episodes, and “Ghostfacers,” which was shot like a cheesy ghost-hunting reality show using handheld cameras. Alongside Edlund was director Robert Singer, an executive producer on the series and a massive movie fan himself.
ERIC KRIPKE (Creator): I was an obsessive fan of The X-Files and in their prime, they got really bold and adventurous with their format, and they had a black-and-white episode. I was always hoping that we could start taking those same kinds of swings. I remember saying, “I want to do a black-and-white episode where Sam and Dean are up against the classic movie monsters.” But I think Ben came up with the shapeshifter. We were trying to figure out: How do you get a mummy and a werewolf and a Frankenstein and a Dracula in the same episode? That makes no f---ing sense. So this idea of a shapeshifter who loved those movies and was ultimately just a fanboy was the secret to cracking that one open.
ROBERT SINGER (Director): I think that script was Ben at his best. I was really happy that I was in line to direct because I really loved those old movies, so it was fortuitous that I got to do it.
JENSEN ACKLES (Dean Winchester): It’s all just paying homage to the old-school ways of doing things, which having Bob at the helm, he’s seen all those movies time and time again, so he was the perfect guy to direct this episode.
KRIPKE: Bob has an encyclopedic knowledge of movies, especially older films. He’s a classicist and his directing style is a lot of that kind of beautiful, elegant Hollywood style, and I think he just really relished it.
SINGER: I shot generally with wider lenses than I would normally do with Supernatural to try to give it some of that old-time feel. I really took pains to make it look as old fashioned as I possibly could. I’m a big fan of James Whale, who had done Frankenstein, and there are a lot of great crane shots in those movies, so I did a lot of crane work in this. We did a lot of shadow play.
JARED PADALECKI (Sam Winchester): You put Ben Edlund on writing and Bob Singer on directing and magic is bound to happen.
But there was another piece of the puzzle that needed to come together for the magic to truly work: Who would play the shapeshifter (and therefore spend the episode doing their best Dracula)? The answer was Todd Stashwick.
TODD STASHWICK (Dracula): They wanted a full-on replication of Bela Lugosi’s performance. I had the DVD of the 1930’s Dracula, so I was watching that just to get the mannerisms and vocal intonation down so that I wasn’t doing a Xerox carbon copy but rather actually trying to get that Hungarian dialect that he has. I went in [to the audition] and just swung for the rafters.
SINGER: We had him do one of the Dracula scenes and then do the speech where he’s telling her how he became the way he became and Todd just killed it. That was an easy call to cast him.
STASHWICK: They wanted to know that you were going to be able to bring both sides to it, the full-on studied Dracula performance and then to let that mask drop and see the wounded man that is the monster.
KRIPKE: We needed someone who could stick the landing on the Dracula part and that’s really hard. It’s hard to do it and have it not come off like a bit. Todd is a remarkable mimic of Bela Lugosi and brings humanity and soulfulness and depth to it. There’s something in his eyes that made it deeper and sadder than had you cast someone who was just going for an impersonation.
PADALECKI: That episode belongs to Todd Stashwick. He’s so damn good.
Alongside Stashwick was Melinda Sward, whose character Jamie, a local waitress, caught Dean's eye and marked a first for the show.
KRIPKE: At the time, there was a young female fan named Jamie. She and her mother would write us letters and they were super fans, and we were still early enough that we’re like, “I can’t believe there’s fans.” Jamie had medical issues, so when the season was coming up, I wrote her a response and said, “If you concentrate on getting better, we’ll name a character after you.” And she responded and said, “That’s amazing, but can you just do me a favor? Can you make sure it’s a character that doesn’t die?” So the female lead in this one we named Jamie. That was one of the only times we ever named a character after a real person and a fan. The happy ending is she was thrilled and she grew up healthy and now tours around with a replica of the Impala.
ACKLES: Jamie was one of my favorite Dean Girls. Melinda was so good and so fun.
From the instant the episode began, fans knew they were in for something special as the old black-and-white WB logo kicked off a very old-school credits sequence.
SINGER: Right from the opening of the Warner Brothers shield, you know where you’re going. It set the tone perfectly.
KRIPKE: That and “Changing Channels” are the only two episodes where I’ll sit down and just watch the credit sequence. The font, the way you list every crew member, and it just goes on forever. And [composer Christopher] Lennertz wrote real orchestral music for it. I just love the opening of that episode and the way we did that title sequence. But changing subjects, what that reminds me of is the singular genius of Ben Edlund to set this episode during Oktoberfest. Suddenly everyone looks like European villagers and everything becomes a real monster movie.
SINGER: And that location was a party site, but it worked perfect for us.
PADALECKI: It was like an amusement park in the outskirts of Vancouver that we rented out. It ended up unfortunately getting torn down and turned into condos or something.
THE MIDDLE
With the setting and the cast locked, the brothers set out on their hunt, arriving at Oktoberfest to help solve a murder. And when the investigation made Dean late to his first date with Jamie, he found himself face-to-face with Dracula. So naturally, Dean punched the shapeshifter in the face. A fight ensued, one that ended with Dean holding an ear and Dracula ... riding a vespa?
ACKLES: I believe one of the many reasons this show lasted as long as it did is because it can be scary but then at the same time, you throw something like the scooter in and it layers in comedy with horror, with drama, with romance. It touches it all. Bob said it early on and it became a mantra of ours: “No joke is too cheap.”
STASHWICK: That’s the infamous assault scene. I’m in full crazy mode and I’m supposed to clock Jensen in his beautiful face with my elbow, and for whatever reason in that moment — I perhaps leaned in, he perhaps leaned in — we closed that gap and I clocked him. So what you see on the DVD extras is me being all Dracula and then me being mortified that I just hit their billion dollar baby in the face.
ACKLES: He caught me with an elbow but he probably thought he hit me harder than he did. It was a mix between a good shot and a graze, but he immediately broke character. He was like, “Are you good?” And I was like, “Yeah, that one woke me up.” [Laughs]
Dean made it through that fight, but the shapeshifter had already planned its next move: While Sam checked out an eccentric local that they thought was the killer, Dean and Jamie shared a drink back at the bar where she worked. Her friend Lucy (Holly Elissa) then showed up just in time to spike their drinks. By the time Dean woke up, he was wearing Lederhosen while strapped to a table in a dungeon.
SINGER: Jensen was like, “Oh god do I have to wear this?” So to make him feel better, I put on the Lederhosen top. I didn’t go with the full shorts but I did direct that day in the Lederhosen top to take the edge off it a little bit for him.
ACKLES: I remember that! He directed in that shirt. [Laughs] Those were authentic leather Lederhosen from Bavaria. Only the best for Dean.
PADALECKI: When Jensen’s first getting strapped to the table, cause he’s a big guy, I remember them talking about how for the visual's sake, they wanted it to be like he’s a quote-unquote damsel in distress, so if they used a normal-sized platform, it would’ve looked comical, but not in a good way. So they had to make it a little bigger cause he’s kind of big.
Dean wasn’t in the dungeon long before Dracula left him to go answer the doorbell. It seemed the shapeshifter ordered a pizza … and he had a coupon.
KRIPKE: I just love how there’s the monster lab in the basement but then you go upstairs and it’s this mid-century ranch house. That’s almost a direct ripoff of the Steve Martin movie The Man with Two Brains.
SINGER: [Set designer] Jerry [Wanek] did a great job in building the dungeon set, and then when the doorbell rings, you realize it’s in the bottom of a suburban house with a pizza guy showing up at the door.
KRIPKE: When Ben wrote the script, we talked about that scene more than any other scene in the episode. We were so specific about how we wanted the Dracula shapeshifter to react to the pizza guy and the way he’s scared when he says, “Is there garlic on the pizza?” And then the way the pizza guy’s so bored and over it: “Did you order garlic?” And then he says, “No!” It’s the way that he’s so bored of this Dracula at the door.
PADALECKI: I think Jensen and I must’ve watched this episode together in 2008 because I remember us looking at each other and going like, ”Oh my god, [the pizza guy] is way better than he needs to be!”
ACKLES: That line, because of the way that Todd delivered it, we used that line on set many, many times. Whenever somebody asked a question that had an obvious “no” to it, it’d be like, “Hey, did you want the big light on in the distance?” And Bob would be like, “Is there garlic on it?” So that became a little ism on set.
STASHWICK: I’m a Second City guy, so “yes, and” is drilled into my head and yet the two memes I’m most known for, I’m saying the word “no,” and that is Supernatural and Star Trek. I have the no's that are heard around the world.
In the end, the brothers came out victorious and another monster was dead, but not before this one made you feel a little something (and gave one heck of a final monologue quoting King Kong).
KRIPKE: Ben gets all the credit, and rightfully so, for writing the crazy episodes, but where I don’t think he gets enough credit is what a disciplined screenwriter he is in terms of character consistency and rule consistency and just the emotion and pathos he brings to every single story he does. No matter how crazy, he always has such a talent for capturing humanity. I wasn’t counting on the shapeshifter to have pathos but when he gives that speech at the end, it’s so sad. I give him all the credit in the world for that.
SINGER: Eric used to say, “Every villain is a hero of his own story,” so we always tried, as best we could, to give the villains something to do and learn more about them and give them full characters. So even with all this fun, we managed to give him something a little more to do.
PADALECKI: He becomes an almost sympathetic character — I stress almost because he did kill a couple people — but what a great character arc all inside of one episode.
STASHWICK: Because this character wasn’t just a cartoon Dracula and he had that human moment, I think it made him stick in people’s minds more. This monster just really loved the movies. He was the ultimate cosplayer. It might be the thing I’m most known for outside of Star Trek, that one episode of TV.
THE END...?
Although Dracula didn’t make it out alive, the episode seemed to breathe new life into the series, marking perhaps its biggest risk yet, though not the biggest risk the show would ever take.
SINGER: It kind of laid a template for other big swings that we took that were out of the ordinary, whether it was “Changing Channels” or “The French Mistake.” This was the first of our big swings of being totally different than what the show was generally week to week.
KRIPKE: I remember it getting a positive reception. I think people appreciated the swings we were starting to take. I just love that this small little supernatural show that’s arguably a Buffy ripoff on The CW got so experimental. I am really proud that we were doing legit avant-garde stuff, really experimental filmmaking, of which this was one, and then we just kept pushing it.
PADALECKI: It’s such a great episode of television and I think we have a few in our 15 years that could stand alone as something fun to watch and out of the box, and it's certainly easy to argue "Monster Movie" is at the top.
ACKLES: This was really when we were hitting our stride. We were in the pocket with these characters, with the storytelling, with the writing. The first year was really finding our feet, the second was like, "Okay we somehow survived a network merge, let’s not mess this up." And then third season we started playing a little bit. So by the fourth season, we’re like, "Now we know where we need to be." This was the perfect time to do one of these outside-the-box episodes. This is definitely one of my top 10.
SINGER: I directed 48 episodes and if somebody asked me which is my favorite, I would probably say this one. I just had the best time doing it.
Entertainment Weekly
133 notes
·
View notes