Tumgik
#Canadian regulations
freyrnigeria · 5 days
Text
0 notes
indiesellersguild · 9 months
Text
Attention Canadian Sellers! The government is looking to update Canadian copyright law for the age of AI-generated art, and they want your input!
Comments are open until 1/15/24.
97 notes · View notes
auressea · 2 years
Text
this ^report is from 2020. However- much news has since been reported about the staggering increase of wealth 'at the top' since COVID began.
"...Canadian capitalism is exposed in the study as an oligarchic social order.
According to the PBO, the share of wealth held by the top one percent of Canadians is 25.6 percent. This is almost double the estimate of 13.7 percent given by Statistics Canada."
@allthecanadianpolitics good resource article here.
218 notes · View notes
Text
The Alberta Energy Regulator is investigating after dozens of bird carcasses were discovered at an oilsands site near Fort McMurray, Alta.
A post on the AER website on Saturday afternoon said Suncor reported around 4 p.m. Friday that 32 dead waterfowl were found at a tailings pond 29 kilometres north of the community. An update from the regulator late that night said a sweep had been completed by Suncor on Saturday and revised the count to 43 birds as well as two muskrats, one bat and one vole.
An AER inspector was immediately sent to the site to investigate, the announcement said, to ensure mitigation strategies are in place and implemented appropriately by the energy company.
Full article
Tagging: @politicsofcanada
66 notes · View notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 1 year
Text
Internment
"On January 11, 1940, the DOCR [Defence of Canada Regulations] were amended so as to permit preventive detention, internment before the fact of having committed a crime, ie. article 21. This meant that even though charges for precise offences might not hold up in court, communists could still be interned using vague terms. As well, should the police fail in making a DOCR charge stick, then the freed prisoner could quickly be interned. This situation applied to Ottawans Louis Binder and Arthur Saunders, and to westerners  Charles Weir, John McNeil, Pat Lenihan, Alex Miller, and Ben Swankey.
In June, 1940, via DOCR regulation 39C, the Communist Party and related  associations were made illegal. These associations included the Young Communist  League, the League for Peace and Democracy, which had succeeded the League to Fight  War and Fascism, and the Canadian Labour Defence League, as well as several pro-communist, ethnic associations: The Ukrainian Labour-Farmer Temple Association, the  Canadian Ukrainian Youth Federation, the Finnish Organization of Canada, the Russian  Workers and Farmers Club, the Croatian Cultural Organization, the Hungarian Workers  Club, and the Polish People’s Association. Membership in these organizations became illegal; it came to be the grounds most often used for internment.
The first internments took place on June 26, 1940, when Jacob Penner and John Navis, from Winnipeg, and Ottawans Louis Binder and Arthur Saunders were interned. Arrests for internment could follow at any time, but there were more active periods. On June 28 and 29, 1940, nine Montrealers as well as Nicholas Pyndus, from Trois-Rivières, and Robert Kerr and Fergus McKean, each from Vancouver, were interned. On July 8, 1940, seventeen Ukrainian Winnipegers were interned. On August 9, 1940, seven men  including five Montrealers were interned. On September 8 and 9, 1940, five more were  arrested for internment; on October 10, 1940, four more were interned. The last internment in Hull began on February 10, 1942 when Harvey Murphy was transferred from a Toronto prison.
The cases of Jacob Penner and Pat Sullivan provided important legal precedents about the question of habeas corpus. Were the governments and the police obliged to provide motives for the decision to intern someone, other than article 21 of the DOCR, whereby people presented a danger to the security of the state or the prosecution to the war, or article 39C, whereby people were members of an illegal organization? Jacob Penner was a highly-respected communist and municipal councillor in Winnipeg. After being interned in Kananaskis, Penner’s family hired a lawyer who successfully applied for habeas corpus , however, federal authorities simply held him during the summer of 1940 in an immigration centre in Winnipeg. In August, 1940, a federal appeals judge ruled that habeas corpus did not apply to DOCR article 21. Penner was returned to Kananaskis, providing an important precedent relative to internees from Western Canada.
In central Canada, Pat Sullivan, President of the Canadian Seamen’s Union, was arrested on June 18, 1940. The only explanation for Sullivan’s arrest offered to lawyer J. L. Cohen was Sullivan’s membership in the Communist Party, which the defendant denied. Cohen then launched unsuccessful habeas corpus proceedings in which an Ontario judge ruled that habeas corpus was not relevant since the detainer was not the minister of Justice, and the latter was not required to accept recommendations of a consulting committee considering the detention. Cohen was going to subject this tortured logic of the Ontario Appeals Court judge to the Supreme Court, but decided to desist when the federal government promised to improve the workings of the consulting committees, and to reveal more about the motives for Sullivan’s internment. Nevertheless, after considerable stalling by the minister of Justice, it became clear that the real reasons for Sullivan’s internment were strikes by the Canadian Seamen’s Union in 1938 and 1939, and especially in April, 1940, when Sullivan’s union closed shipping on the Great Lakes from the Lakehead to Montreal. Conciliation following this last strike was proceeding when Sullivan was arrested. Not only did Sullivan’s case show that habeas corpus was of no effect with respect to the internees, it also showed that for some internees, at least for Sullivan, the real motive of internment was union activity.
One suspects the considerable influence of C. D. Howe and his business colleagues working in Ottawa. This was also the case for several of Sullivan’s colleagues within the Canadian Seamen’s Union. A month after Sullivan was arrested, Jack Chapman, union secretary, was arrested while a few days later, Dave Sinclair, editor of the union’s newspaper Searchlight, was arrested for having written about the Sullivan case. Sinclair’s case also demonstrated farcically the incompetence of the RCMP. Sinclair was the nom de plume of David Siglar, a fact he did not hide. During his appeal before the consulting committee, the RCMP presented as evidence activities of someone unknown to Siglar named ‘Segal’, a common name among Jews. Siglar had no idea about whom or what the RCMP was talking not knowing the ‘Segal’ in question, but he did plead guilty to having known several people named ‘Segal’.
The case of Charles Murray, organizer for a fishermen’s union in Lockeport, Nova Scotia, a union affiliated with the Canadian Seamen’s Union, provided another example of how union activities might lead to internment. On June 15, 1940, Nova Scotia’s labour minister, L. D. Currie, sent a letter to Murray stating that:
…You are a communist and as such, deserve to be treated in the same manner as I would be treated if I endeavoured to carry on in Russia as you are doing in Nova Scotia. I warn you now to desist from your efforts to create industrial trouble, and I warn you too that your conduct will from now on be carefully watched and examined, and if I find out that you do not quit this sort of business, then it will be most certainly the worst for you. I am giving you this final word of warning. My advice to you is to get out of Lockeport and stay out…
A few days later, Murray was interned in Petawawa.
Other union leaders received similar fates to those of the leaders of the Canadian Seamen’s Union. Fred Collins had led a successful strike against furniture manufacturers in Stratford, Ontario. James Murphy was the leader of the Technical Employees Association of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, and was arrested in the middle of negotiations. Orton Wade was negotiating with meat packing companies in Winnipeg when he was arrested. Bruce Magnuson was a union leader from Port Arthur, where he was local president of the Union of Lumber and Sawmill Workers. Unfortunately, his  federal MP was none other than C. D. Howe. In August, 1940, Howe responded to one of Magnuson’s colleagues complaining about the internment of Magnuson.
For very obvious reasons, the normal course of the law must be supplemented by special powers. Otherwise, the effort of the government to suppress fifth-column activities would be of no avail. The now tragic account of fifth-column activities in Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France is ample proof of the inadequacy of the ordinary peacetime machinery of the law in  controlling subversive elements… Persons who are considered to be friendly towards Canada’s enemies, or who in any way interfere with Canada’s war effort, are recommended for internment on the strength of evidence assembled by the Force (RCMP).
The motive given for Magnuson’s internment was his membership in the Party, but after the Party began supporting the war effort, Howe wrote to Magnuson in October, 1941: 
… do you think that the ends of justice would be served by your release merely because circumstances have caused a change of front by the Communist Party? You were interned because you were out of sympathy with Canada’s war effort, and because you were an active member of an organization which sought to impede that effort.
The case of Clarence Jackson also demonstrated the long arm of Howe. On June 11, 1941, Howe wrote to Justice minister Lapointe, demanding that Jackson be arrested. 
Please permit me to call your attention to the activities of one C. S. Jackson, who is undoubtedly one of the most active trouble makers and labour racketeers in Canada today. Jackson has been expelled from the Canadian Congress of Labour as a Communist. He has  been responsible for strikes at the R.C.A. Victor plant, the Canadian General Electric plant, and he is now boring in to the Canadian Westinghouse plant at Hamilton. The Westinghouse plant is the most important war manufacturer in Canada, having contracts for anti-aircraft guns, naval equipment, and a wide variety of electrical work important to our production. A strike at Westinghouse would directly stop many branches of our munitions programme. I cannot think why Canada spends large sums for protection against sabotage and permits Jackson to carry on his subversive activities. No group of saboteurs could possibly effect the damage that this man is causing. I feel sure that this is a matter for prompt police action. I suggest that responsible labour leaders can supply any information that you may require on which to base police action.
There is evidence, furthermore, according to the biographer of Jackson, that the Canadian Congress of Labour was complicit in the internment of Jackson. Jackson was arrested on June 23, 1941, but was released from Hull six months later owing to pressure by the American section of his union. 
Others were interned for strange reasons. Rodolphe Majeau, a member of the Canadian Seamen’s Union, was interned for having aided Communist candidate Évariste Dubé during the federal election of 1940, when the Party was still legal, an example of a retroactive charge. Scott McLean, a Cape Breton millwright was interned because of dynamite he had in his possession when arrested, dynamite he was using to explode rocks and a manure pile on his farm. John Prossack, from Winnipeg, an elderly Ukrainian  charged with membership in the Party, was not in the least involved in politics. Prossack believed that he was interned owing to a bad relationship with his former son-in-law, a paid police informer. Muni Taub, a Montreal tailor left the Party at the end of 1939,  one of the many Europeans disgusted at the Hitler-Stalin pact. Nevertheless, motives given for Taub’s internment included his writing for a leftist, Jewish newspaper; his  membership in the banned Canadian Labour Defence League, and most of all, Taub’s challenge of the constitutionality of Duplessis’ Padlock Law during the 1930s."
- Michael Martin, The Red Patch: Political Imprisonment in Hull, Quebec during World War 2. Self-published, 2007. p. 124-131
5 notes · View notes
Text
I was in Canadian Tire today looking wistfully at welding accessories and a big dude in camo pants walked up to look at power tools and he was accompanied by the faint but unmistakeable sound of alex jones' voice but I could not determine where it was coming from. Like I have to assume it was his phone but was he watching a youtube video? Listening to a podcast? Without headphones? In a public space? Sir we are here to look at expensive power tools and dream of owning them one day, there is No Room in this aisle for bigotry.
4 notes · View notes
generalfarttyphoon · 1 month
Text
15 Weird Hobbies That'll Make You Better at brampton best immigration lawyer
1 Put up facts Article aspects of your respective immigration Lawyers specifications in times, entirely free. 2 Obtain professionals We will see immigration lawyers close to you and do the legwork to contact them on your own behalf. three Get prices Receive rapid free immigration consultant brampton mississauga immigration attorneys estimates from your best immigration lawyers near you.
Canada also offers a simple route to citizenship. Unless of course there is a career in Canada, you would like evidence of other money to obtain residency in certain immigration systems. Guide a consultation with us for more information
harpartap singh ★★★★★ 6 months in the past Really Experienced, concentrated, compassionate. Thanks pretty much from the bottom of my heart. I actually respect the professionalism with the Canoz Immigration Group.
Our expert legal industry experts are in this article to provide you with Perception and advice as you begin to create your new existence in Canada. Vivid is right here every action of the way To help you in navigating Canada’s immigration and citizenship processes. what would you want to understand
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fS_581tRKvU/hqdefault_549966.jpg
Thanks for subscribing! You can expect to get an electronic mail shortly to confirm your subscription. If you do not get your confirmation email, make sure you Look at your spam folder and go the e-mail for your inbox.
Countless pathways/choices to choose from. We understand your specifications and help you realize your desires by suggesting the best-suited remedies that function. We do our best for you and work as part of your best curiosity.
Velocity - Our Expert Consultant Brampton will function with you to collect every one of the essential documentation and information as speedily as you can.
do the job from homeimmigration consultantimmigration assistantadministrative assistantpart timefull timeimmigration+governmentremoteno practical experience
It truly is obligatory to acquire person consent before working these cookies on your website. Preserve & Settle for
You may only make an application for a work visa following you get a position present or an work agreement from the Canadian firm/employer. The involved employer requirements to acquire an LMIA (Labour Market place […]
• Decide essential documentation the customer requires to supply According to the set immigration system
This website employs http://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q= ts immigration consultant brampton cookies to boost person working experience. Through the use of our Web site you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privateness Policy.Ok, I understandLearn much more
I'm happy Together with the assistance provided by My Visa Source, and suggest My Visa Resource for people who find themselves bewildered about their immigration approach and are searhing for a serving to hand.
Harsimrat ma'am will guidebook you the best for every information and go ahead and take best treatment to make u get to Ur Abroad desired destination...
0 notes
catmemey · 3 months
Text
all I need to do is spend less money <- said while crying and sobbing
1 note · View note
itsrockinronnie · 9 months
Text
Regulator #1 by Arthur Pequegnat
One clock that holds a special meaning and one that I would like to add to my collection someday is the Arthur Pequegnat Regulator #1, a single-weight eight-day clock. This clock is truly a rare find, though the prices I’ve encountered thus far are a bit steep for my budget. Arthur Pequegnat Regulator #1, photo taken at The Canadian Clock Museum in Deep River Ontario, Canada The Arthur…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
arora297consultancy · 10 months
Text
Ensuring Food Safety Through the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations
Tumblr media
In today's world, food safety is a paramount concern for governments, businesses, and consumers alike. In Canada, ensuring the safety of food products is a top priority, and this responsibility falls under the purview of the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations. This comprehensive regulatory framework governs all aspects of food safety, from Food License Registration to Food Safety Canada, Food Safety Certificate Canada, and more.
The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations: An Overview
The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations is a vital piece of legislation in Canada aimed at safeguarding the nation's food supply. These regulations cover a wide range of areas, ensuring that food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors adhere to stringent food safety standards. Let's delve into some of the key aspects of these regulations and how they contribute to the safety of our food supply.
Food License Registration: To operate a business in the food industry in Canada, you need to obtain a Food License Registration. This license is a critical requirement, and it ensures that businesses are accountable for the quality and safety of the food they produce, distribute, or import. Food License Registration is a clear demonstration of a commitment to food safety.
Food Safety Regulations: The core of the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations revolves around food safety. These regulations establish safe food handling, processing, and transportation requirements. They encompass everything from the cleanliness of facilities to the safe storage of food products.
Canada Food Labelling: Proper labeling of food products is essential for consumers to make informed choices. The regulations mandate clear and accurate Canada Food Labelling, ensuring that consumers have access to critical information about the products they purchase, including ingredient lists, allergen information, and nutritional content.
Food and Drug Regulations Canada: Food and Drug Regulations Canada is a comprehensive set of rules that govern the safety, efficacy, and quality of food and drug products. These regulations are an integral part of the broader framework of food safety in the country, ensuring that not only food but also pharmaceuticals and medical devices meet stringent standards.
HACCP Process: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) is a systematic approach to identifying, evaluating, and controlling food safety hazards. The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations require food businesses to implement HACCP processes to identify potential risks and take preventive measures to mitigate them. This proactive approach is key to preventing foodborne illnesses and other safety issues.
Food Safety Certificate Canada: A Food Safety Certificate Canada is a mark of compliance with the regulations. It is evidence that a business has met the necessary requirements to ensure food safety, from proper handling to labeling. This certificate not only builds consumer trust but also allows businesses to expand and export their products to international markets.
Food Safety Canada: Food Safety Canada is a collective effort by government agencies, industry stakeholders, and consumers to maintain the highest standards of food safety. The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations are a cornerstone of these efforts, providing a legal framework for food safety practices across the country.
The Importance of Food Safety Regulations
The significance of robust food safety regulations cannot be overstated. Foodborne illnesses are a real and present danger, and unsafe food can severely affect public health. The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations play a crucial role in minimizing these risks and ensuring that the food we consume is safe.
For businesses in the food and beverage industry, compliance with these regulations is not just a legal requirement; it's also a matter of responsibility. Failing to adhere to these regulations can result in serious consequences, including fines, business closures, and damage to a company's reputation.
Furthermore, food safety is not limited to domestic concerns. In an increasingly globalized world, food products are frequently traded across borders. To maintain Canada's reputation for safe and high-quality food products, these regulations are essential. They ensure that Canadian food products meet international standards, allowing businesses to access international markets and enhancing the nation's global standing in the food industry.
The Role of Food License Registration
One of the first and most crucial steps for any business in the food industry is obtaining Food License Registration. This process involves submitting an application that outlines the type of food activities the business will engage in, including manufacturing, processing, importing, or exporting. The information provided in the application is critical in determining the appropriate level of oversight and regulation for the business.
Food License Registration is not a one-time process. It requires ongoing compliance with the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations. This includes maintaining records, providing access to inspectors, and ensuring that facilities and equipment meet established standards. The purpose of these ongoing requirements is to ensure that businesses maintain a consistent commitment to food safety.
Canada Food Labelling and Transparency
Accurate and clear Canada Food Labelling is a fundamental component of food safety regulations. Food labels provide consumers with vital information, allowing them to make informed choices about the products they purchase. This includes ingredient lists, nutritional information, allergen warnings, and safe handling instructions.
Proper labeling also extends to the presentation of food products. Misleading packaging or labeling can not only deceive consumers but can also have serious health consequences. Food safety regulations dictate that labels must be truthful, easy to understand, and properly placed on the product.
Food and Drug Regulations Canada
The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations is part of a broader regulatory framework that includes the Food and Drug Regulations Canada. These regulations govern not only food but also pharmaceuticals and medical devices. This comprehensive approach reflects Canada's commitment to public health and safety.
The Food and Drug Regulations Canada specify standards for product quality, efficacy, and safety. They provide the foundation for ensuring that food and drug products in Canada are of the highest quality and pose minimal risks to consumers. This comprehensive regulatory approach is crucial for maintaining public trust in the safety and efficacy of products.
HACCP Process for Preventive Control
The HACCP process is a preventive control system that focuses on identifying and mitigating potential food safety hazards. It is a proactive approach that involves identifying critical control points where hazards can be controlled, monitoring these points, and taking corrective action when necessary. This systematic approach is designed to prevent food safety issues before they occur.
Businesses in the food and beverage industry are required to implement HACCP systems as part of their compliance with the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations. This ensures that they have processes in place to monitor and address potential risks, reducing the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and other safety issues.
Food Safety Certificate Canada: A Mark of Quality
A Food Safety Certificate Canada is a testament to a business's commitment to food safety. It is issued to businesses that have demonstrated compliance with the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations. This certificate not only enhances consumer trust but also opens doors to international markets.
For businesses looking to export their food products, a Food Safety Certificate Canada is often a requirement for entry into foreign markets. It demonstrates that the products meet rigorous food safety standards, allowing Canadian businesses to compete on the global stage.
The Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations are a comprehensive framework designed to ensure the safety and quality of food products in Canada. From Food License Registration to Food Safety Certificate Canada, these regulations cover all aspects of the food and beverage industry. They provide a foundation for maintaining public trust, expanding into international markets, and, most importantly, safeguarding public health.
Food safety is a shared responsibility, and these regulations provide the necessary structure and guidance for businesses to meet their obligations. By adhering to these regulations, businesses not only ensure their success but also contribute to the overall safety of the Canadian food supply. In a world where food safety is paramount, the Safe Food for Canadians License Regulations stand as a beacon of assurance for both businesses and consumers.
0 notes
mgeist · 1 year
Text
Why the Government’s Bill C-18 Draft Regulations Are Stacked Against Small, Independent, and Digital-First Media Outlets
The problems with government’s Bill C-18 draft regulations involve more than just what amounts to a 4% link tax on Google and Meta alongside little effort to ensure the resulting revenues are used to support spending on journalists and news content. As noted in previous posts, the draft regulations put an end to the claim that the Online News Act involves compensation for news creation since the…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Schrödinger’s Lozenge: Is a lozenge an edible, or an extract? In Canada, the answer depends on if it’s a cannabis product.
In January 2023, Health Canada, the federal authority overseeing the sale of medical and adult-use cannabis in Canada, began issuing stop-sale letters to licensed producers manufacturing “edible extracts,” mostly lozenges and dissolvable gummies. These products, producers held, were classified as extracts rather than edibles because they were intended for sublingual absorption and their…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Photographs taken by Yon Shimizu, a Japanese-Canadian who was exiled from the west coast of Canada to Ontario during the second World War, along with hundreds of other Japanese-Canadian men. In 1942, he worked along with several dozen other men as a farm labourer with the Ontario Farm Service Force near Glencoe, equidistant from Sarnia, London and Chatham.  These are photographs he took of the sugarbeet harvest, and were digitized from a DVD of Yon Shimizu’s scrapbook by the Southwestern Ontario Digital Archive. All dated 1942 though they definitely show a range of time during that summer and fall - final harvesting of sugarbeets is in late October or November, and the last photo shows the men huddling from the cold in November.
1) At Glencoe train station; the ‘49′ Gang, according to the caption. Left to right: Tsutomu "Stum" Shimizu, E. Ono, T. Okamoto, T. Kuwabara.
2) Blocking 48 Gang, that is, thinning or "blocking" the sugar beets; left to right: S. Miyashita, Y. Madokoro, S. Kawahara, J. Henmi.
3) “He-Men.” Left to right: B. Hoita, K. Goto, T. Hoita.
4) “Siesta Time!” T. Okamoto taking a siesta during the beet harvest.
5) “Block Busters!” Showing off some huge sugarbeets during the thinning (blocking) process.
6) Gang 5 "Toppers A-1" Butch Hoita and Stum Shimizu.
7) Gang 5 "Toppers A-1" Tommy Hoita and Tomo Okamoto.
8) Gang 5 "Toppers A-1" Stum Okamoto and Esao Ono.
9) Gang 5 "Toppers A-1" Tom Kuwabara and Yon Shimizu. Toppers defoliate the beets as close to harvesting as possible.
10) Lunch, Cold November Day
87 notes · View notes
ciaai · 2 years
Text
Informational Institution
Website : https://www.ciaai.net/
Address : Montréal, Quebec, Canada
The Canadian Institute of Animal-Assisted Interventions is a comprehensive and lively source of information on Animal-Assisted Interventions in Canada and around the world.
Our mission is to educate and inform about Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI) and present its most innovative and original programs in Canada and worldwide. We welcome practitioners of AAI, animal lovers and people who are just curious.
What Are the Animal-Assisted Interventions?
Animal-assisted interventions are goal-oriented and structured interventions that intentionally incorporate animals in health, education and human service for the purpose of therapeutic gains and improved health and wellness.
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/ciofaai
Keywords: animal assisted therapy canadian service dogs canadian service dog certification canada service dog service dog in canada service dog grants canada animal charities canada service dog organizations canada ontario emotional support animal laws one health services canadian foundation adhd service dog canada emotional support animal certification ontario emotional support animal new brunswick animal-assisted therapy the canadian foundation for animal-assisted support services service dogs for anxiety canada citadel service dogs service dog laws canada accessible transportation for persons with disabilities regulations national canadian animal service dog canada certification searchlight service dogs mira dogs canada animal assistance society animal assisted therapy animals via rail emotional support animal bc emotional support animal laws what is a service dog in canada occupational therapy with animals therapy with animals near me how animals can help humans how can animals help humans animal assisted learning how can animals help humans with disabilities how can humans help animals how can humans help endangered animals animal ngos in canada animal ngos near me animal assisted intervention course a careers in therapy with animals an animal-assisted therapy intervention with female inmates animal assisted therapy for children with pervasive developmental disorders animal assisted therapy for sensiors with depression animal assisted therapy in dealing with anxiety animal assisted therapy with horse for the elderly animal therapy for elderly with memory disorders animal therapy with adolescent animals in therapy with teens articles on animal therapy with down syndrome child therapy with animals children with disabilities and animal therapy helping children with disabilities through animal assisted therapy how animals help humans to develop social skills with therapy how therapy animals help with mental health issues with animal assisted therapy mental health therapy with animals mental problems helped with animal therapy physical therapy with animals the effects of animal-assisted therapy on a child with autism therapy with animals how animals can help humans with autism how animals can help humans with special needs how can animals and humans help each other how can animals and humans help one another how can animals help humans in the future how can humans and animals help one another how can humans help wildlife animal's how humans can help animals amazing ngos helping animals animal ngos animal ngos canada animal rights ngos animation services for ngos canada animal rights ngos ngos for animals ngos for animals all over the world ngos in canada for animals some amazing ngos for animals wild animal trafficking ngos wildaid animal trafficking ngos wildlife alliance animal trafficking ngos world wide fund for nature animal trafficking ngos animal assisted therapy via distance learning animal nursing assistant distance learning
1 note · View note
Text
The reason you can’t buy a car is the same reason that your health insurer let hackers dox you
Tumblr media
On July 14, I'm giving the closing keynote for the fifteenth HACKERS ON PLANET EARTH, in QUEENS, NY. Happy Bastille Day! On July 20, I'm appearing in CHICAGO at Exile in Bookville.
Tumblr media
In 2017, Equifax suffered the worst data-breach in world history, leaking the deep, nonconsensual dossiers it had compiled on 148m Americans and 15m Britons, (and 19k Canadians) into the world, to form an immortal, undeletable reservoir of kompromat and premade identity-theft kits:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Equifax_data_breach
Equifax knew the breach was coming. It wasn't just that their top execs liquidated their stock in Equifax before the announcement of the breach – it was also that they ignored years of increasingly urgent warnings from IT staff about the problems with their server security.
Things didn't improve after the breach. Indeed, the 2017 Equifax breach was the starting gun for a string of more breaches, because Equifax's servers didn't just have one fubared system – it was composed of pure, refined fubar. After one group of hackers breached the main Equifax system, other groups breached other Equifax systems, over and over, and over:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/equifax-password-username-admin-lawsuit-201118316.html
Doesn't this remind you of Boeing? It reminds me of Boeing. The spectacular 737 Max failures in 2018 weren't the end of the scandal. They weren't even the scandal's start – they were the tipping point, the moment in which a long history of lethally defective planes "breached" from the world of aviation wonks and into the wider public consciousness:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_the_Boeing_737
Just like with Equifax, the 737 Max disasters tipped Boeing into a string of increasingly grim catastrophes. Each fresh disaster landed with the grim inevitability of your general contractor texting you that he's just opened up your ceiling and discovered that all your joists had rotted out – and that he won't be able to deal with that until he deals with the termites he found last week, and that they'll have to wait until he gets to the cracks in the foundation slab from the week before, and that those will have to wait until he gets to the asbestos he just discovered in the walls.
Drip, drip, drip, as you realize that the most expensive thing you own – which is also the thing you had hoped to shelter for the rest of your life – isn't even a teardown, it's just a pure liability. Even if you razed the structure, you couldn't start over, because the soil is full of PCBs. It's not a toxic asset, because it's not an asset. It's just toxic.
Equifax isn't just a company: it's infrastructure. It started out as an engine for racial, political and sexual discrimination, paying snoops to collect gossip from nosy neighbors, which was assembled into vast warehouses full of binders that told bank officers which loan applicants should be denied for being queer, or leftists, or, you know, Black:
https://jacobin.com/2017/09/equifax-retail-credit-company-discrimination-loans
This witch-hunts-as-a-service morphed into an official part of the economy, the backbone of the credit industry, with a license to secretly destroy your life with haphazardly assembled "facts" about your life that you had the most minimal, grudging right to appeal (or even see). Turns out there are a lot of customers for this kind of service, and the capital markets showered Equifax with the cash needed to buy almost all of its rivals, in mergers that were waved through by a generation of Reaganomics-sedated antitrust regulators.
There's a direct line from that acquisition spree to the Equifax breach(es). First of all, companies like Equifax were early adopters of technology. They're a database company, so they were the crash-test dummies for ever generation of database. These bug-riddled, heavily patched systems were overlaid with subsequent layers of new tech, with new defects to be patched and then overlaid with the next generation.
These systems are intrinsically fragile, because things fall apart at the seams, and these systems are all seams. They are tech-debt personified. Now, every kind of enterprise will eventually reach this state if it keeps going long enough, but the early digitizers are the bow-wave of that coming infopocalypse, both because they got there first and because the bottom tiers of their systems are composed of layers of punchcards and COBOL, crumbling under the geological stresses of seventy years of subsequent technology.
The single best account of this phenomenon is the British Library's postmortem of their ransomware attack, which is also in the running for "best hard-eyed assessment of how fucked things are":
https://www.bl.uk/home/british-library-cyber-incident-review-8-march-2024.pdf
There's a reason libraries, cities, insurance companies, and other giant institutions keep getting breached: they started accumulating tech debt before anyone else, so they've got more asbestos in the walls, more sagging joists, more foundation cracks and more termites.
That was the starting point for Equifax – a company with a massive tech debt that it would struggle to pay down under the most ideal circumstances.
Then, Equifax deliberately made this situation infinitely worse through a series of mergers in which it bought dozens of other companies that all had their own version of this problem, and duct-taped their failing, fucked up IT systems to its own. The more seams an IT system has, the more brittle and insecure it is. Equifax deliberately added so many seams that you need to be able to visualized additional spatial dimensions to grasp them – they had fractal seams.
But wait, there's more! The reason to merge with your competitors is to create a monopoly position, and the value of a monopoly position is that it makes a company too big to fail, which makes it too big to jail, which makes it too big to care. Each Equifax acquisition took a piece off the game board, making it that much harder to replace Equifax if it fucked up. That, in turn, made it harder to punish Equifax if it fucked up. And that meant that Equifax didn't have to care if it fucked up.
Which is why the increasingly desperate pleas for more resources to shore up Equifax's crumbling IT and security infrastructure went unheeded. Top management could see that they were steaming directly into an iceberg, but they also knew that they had a guaranteed spot on the lifeboats, and that someone else would be responsible for fishing the dead passengers out of the sea. Why turn the wheel?
That's what happened to Boeing, too: the company acquired new layers of technical complexity by merging with rivals (principally McDonnell-Douglas), and then starved the departments that would have to deal with that complexity because it was being managed by execs whose driving passion was to run a company that was too big to care. Those execs then added more complexity by chasing lower costs by firing unionized, competent, senior staff and replacing them with untrained scabs in jurisdictions chosen for their lax labor and environmental enforcement regimes.
(The biggest difference was that Boeing once had a useful, high-quality product, whereas Equifax started off as an irredeemably terrible, if efficient, discrimination machine, and grew to become an equally terrible, but also ferociously incompetent, enterprise.)
This is the American story of the past four decades: accumulate tech debt, merge to monopoly, exponentially compound your tech debt by combining barely functional IT systems. Every corporate behemoth is locked in a race between the eventual discovery of its irreparable structural defects and its ability to become so enmeshed in our lives that we have to assume the costs of fixing those defects. It's a contest between "too rotten to stand" and "too big to care."
Remember last February, when we all discovered that there was a company called Change Healthcare, and that they were key to processing virtually every prescription filled in America? Remember how we discovered this? Change was hacked, went down, ransomed, and no one could fill a scrip in America for more than a week, until they paid the hackers $22m in Bitcoin?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Change_Healthcare_ransomware_attack
How did we end up with Change Healthcare as the linchpin of the entire American prescription system? Well, first Unitedhealthcare became the largest health insurer in America by buying all its competitors in a series of mergers that comatose antitrust regulators failed to block. Then it combined all those other companies' IT systems into a cosmic-scale dog's breakfast that barely ran. Then it bought Change and used its monopoly power to ensure that every Rx ran through Change's servers, which were part of that asbestos-filled, termite-infested, crack-foundationed, sag-joisted teardown. Then, it got hacked.
United's execs are the kind of execs on a relentless quest to be too big to care, and so they don't care. Which is why their they had to subsequently announce that they had suffered a breach that turned the complete medical histories of one third of Americans into immortal Darknet kompromat that is – even now – being combined with breach data from Equifax and force-fed to the slaves in Cambodia and Laos's pig-butchering factories:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/01/politics/data-stolen-healthcare-hack/index.html
Those slaves are beaten, tortured, and punitively raped in compounds to force them to drain the life's savings of everyone in Canada, Australia, Singapore, the UK and Europe. Remember that they are downstream of the forseeable, inevitable IT failures of companies that set out to be too big to care that this was going to happen.
Failures like Ticketmaster's, which flushed 500 million users' personal information into the identity-theft mills just last month. Ticketmaster, you'll recall, grew to its current scale through (you guessed it), a series of mergers en route to "too big to care" status, that resulted in its IT systems being combined with those of Ticketron, Live Nation, and dozens of others:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/31/business/ticketmaster-hack-data-breach.html
But enough about that. Let's go car-shopping!
Good luck with that. There's a company you've never heard. It's called CDK Global. They provide "dealer management software." They are a monopolist. They got that way after being bought by a private equity fund called Brookfield. You can't complete a car purchase without their systems, and their systems have been hacked. No one can buy a car:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/27/business/cdk-global-cyber-attack-update/index.html
Writing for his BIG newsletter, Matt Stoller tells the all-too-familiar story of how CDK Global filled the walls of the nation's auto-dealers with the IT equivalent of termites and asbestos, and lays the blame where it belongs: with a legal and economics establishment that wanted it this way:
https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/a-supreme-court-justice-is-why-you
The CDK story follows the Equifax/Boeing/Change Healthcare/Ticketmaster pattern, but with an important difference. As CDK was amassing its monopoly power, one of its execs, Dan McCray, told a competitor, Authenticom founder Steve Cottrell that if he didn't sell to CDK that he would "fucking destroy" Authenticom by illegally colluding with the number two dealer management company Reynolds.
Rather than selling out, Cottrell blew the whistle, using Cottrell's own words to convince a district court that CDK had violated antitrust law. The court agreed, and ordered CDK and Reynolds – who controlled 90% of the market – to continue to allow Authenticom to participate in the DMS market.
Dealers cheered this on: CDK/Reynolds had been steadily hiking prices, while ingesting dealer data and using it to gouge the dealers on additional services, while denying dealers access to their own data. The services that Authenticom provided for $35/month cost $735/month from CDK/Reynolds (they justified this price hike by saying they needed the additional funds to cover the costs of increased information security!).
CDK/Reynolds appealed the judgment to the 7th Circuit, where a panel of economists weighed in. As Stoller writes, this panel included monopoly's most notorious (and well-compensated) cheerleader, Frank Easterbrook, and the "legendary" Democrat Diane Wood. They argued for CDK/Reynolds, demanding that the court release them from their obligations to share the market with Authenticom:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-7th-circuit/1879150.html
The 7th Circuit bought the argument, overturning the lower court and paving the way for the CDK/Reynolds monopoly, which is how we ended up with one company's objectively shitty IT systems interwoven into the sale of every car, which meant that when Russian hackers looked at that crosseyed, it split wide open, allowing them to halt auto sales nationwide. What happens next is a near-certainty: CDK will pay a multimillion dollar ransom, and the hackers will reward them by breaching the personal details of everyone who's ever bought a car, and the slaves in Cambodian pig-butchering compounds will get a fresh supply of kompromat.
But on the plus side, the need to pay these huge ransoms is key to ensuring liquidity in the cryptocurrency markets, because ransoms are now the only nondiscretionary liability that can only be settled in crypto:
https://locusmag.com/2022/09/cory-doctorow-moneylike/
When the 7th Circuit set up every American car owner to be pig-butchered, they cited one of the most important cases in antitrust history: the 2004 unanimous Supreme Court decision in Verizon v Trinko:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2003/02-682
Trinko was a case about whether antitrust law could force Verizon, a telcoms monopolist, to share its lines with competitors, something it had been ordered to do and then cheated on. The decision was written by Antonin Scalia, and without it, Big Tech would never have been able to form. Scalia and Trinko gave us the modern, too-big-to-care versions of Google, Meta, Apple, Microsoft and the other tech baronies.
In his Trinko opinion, Scalia said that "possessing monopoly power" and "charging monopoly prices" was "not unlawful" – rather, it was "an important element of the free-market system." Scalia – writing on behalf of a unanimous court! – said that fighting monopolists "may lessen the incentive for the monopolist…to invest in those economically beneficial facilities."
In other words, in order to prevent monopolists from being too big to care, we have to let them have monopolies. No wonder Trinko is the Zelig of shitty antitrust rulings, from the decision to dismiss the antitrust case against Facebook and Apple's defense in its own ongoing case:
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/073_2021.06.28_mtd_order_memo.pdf
Trinko is the origin node of too big to care. It's the reason that our whole economy is now composed of "infrastructure" that is made of splitting seams, asbestos, termites and dry rot. It's the reason that the entire automotive sector became dependent on companies like Reynolds, whose billionaire owner intentionally and illegally destroyed evidence of his company's crimes, before going on to commit the largest tax fraud in American history:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/billionaire-robert-brockman-accused-of-biggest-tax-fraud-in-u-s-history-dies-at-81-11660226505
Trinko begs companies to become too big to care. It ensures that they will exponentially increase their IT debt while becoming structurally important to whole swathes of the US economy. It guarantees that they will underinvest in IT security. It is the soil in which pig butchering grew.
It's why you can't buy a car.
Now, I am fond of quoting Stein's Law at moments like this: "anything that can't go on forever will eventually stop." As Stoller writes, after two decades of unchallenged rule, Trinko is looking awfully shaky. It was substantially narrowed in 2023 by the 10th Circuit, which had been briefed by Biden's antitrust division:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/22-1164/22-1164-2023-08-21.html
And the cases of 2024 have something going for them that Trinko lacked in 2004: evidence of what a fucking disaster Trinko is. The wrongness of Trinko is so increasingly undeniable that there's a chance it will be overturned.
But it won't go down easy. As Stoller writes, Trinko didn't emerge from a vacuum: the economic theories that underpinned it come from some of the heroes of orthodox economics, like Joseph Schumpeter, who is positively worshipped. Schumpeter was antitrust's OG hater, who wrote extensively that antitrust law didn't need to exist because any harmful monopoly would be overturned by an inevitable market process dictated by iron laws of economics.
Schumpeter wrote that monopolies could only be sustained by "alertness and energy" – that there would never be a monopoly so secure that its owner became too big to care. But he went further, insisting that the promise of attaining a monopoly was key to investment in great new things, because monopolists had the economic power that let them plan and execute great feats of innovation.
The idea that monopolies are benevolent dictators has pervaded our economic tale for decades. Even today, critics who deplore Facebook and Google do so on the basis that they do not wield their power wisely (say, to stamp out harassment or disinformation). When confronted with the possibility of breaking up these companies or replacing them with smaller platforms, those critics recoil, insisting that without Big Tech's scale, no one will ever have the power to accomplish their goals:
https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/18/urban-wildlife-interface/#combustible-walled-gardens
But they misunderstand the relationship between corporate power and corporate conduct. The reason corporations accumulate power is so that they can be insulated from the consequences of the harms they wreak upon the rest of us. They don't inflict those harms out of sadism: rather, they do so in order to externalize the costs of running a good system, reaping the profits of scale while we pay its costs.
The only reason to accumulate corporate power is to grow too big to care. Any corporation that amasses enough power that it need not care about us will not care about it. You can't fix Facebook by replacing Zuck with a good unelected social media czar with total power over billions of peoples' lives. We need to abolish Zuck, not fix Zuck.
Zuck is not exceptional: there were a million sociopaths whom investors would have funded to monopolistic dominance if he had balked. A monopoly like Facebook has a Zuck-shaped hole at the top of its org chart, and only someone Zuck-shaped will ever fit through that hole.
Our whole economy is now composed of companies with sociopath-shaped holes at the tops of their org chart. The reason these companies can only be run by sociopaths is the same reason that they have become infrastructure that is crumbling due to sociopathic neglect. The reckless disregard for the risk of combining companies is the source of the market power these companies accumulated, and the market power let them neglect their systems to the point of collapse.
This is the system that Schumpeter, and Easterbrook, and Wood, and Scalia – and the entire Supreme Court of 2004 – set out to make. The fact that you can't buy a car is a feature, not a bug. The pig-butcherers, wallowing in an ocean of breach data, are a feature, not a bug. The point of the system was what it did: create unimaginable wealth for a tiny cohort of the worst people on Earth without regard to the collapse this would provoke, or the plight of those of us trapped and suffocating in the rubble.
Tumblr media
Support me this summer on the Clarion Write-A-Thon and help raise money for the Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers' Workshop!
Tumblr media
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/28/dealer-management-software/#antonin-scalia-stole-your-car
Tumblr media
Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg
CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en
991 notes · View notes
Text
Canada PR for International Students, Foreign Workers will get easier with new Motion-44 Plan
The transition to Canada PR for International Students and Foreign Workers is about to get easy. The new M-44 plan has been passed and now new ways will be devised to fast-track the permanent residency process.M-44 is also known as Motion 44 — “Permanent Residency for Temporary Foreign Workers” — and is a motion regarding Canadian immigration that was introduced in Parliament on January 31, 2022, by Randeep Sarai of the Liberal party, Surrey Centre, B.C. It has since been amended and was agreed to on May 11, 2022.
Tumblr media
The passed M-44 motion called on to the government to release a plan for the expansion of economic immigration pathways so that workers at all skill levels can access the benefits of permanent residency in Canada, especially in fields where there a labor shortage. It would also aid in the smooth transition of temporary resident status to a permanent resident. Canada’s permanent residency, PR process is about to get much simpler and faster for many international students and foreign workers. According to Randeep S. Sarai, Liberal Member of Parliament for Surrey Centre, the motion M-44 was passed in the House of Commons, one that dealt with the issue under consideration. With the passing of this, it is now expected that Canada's PR for international students and workers will be fast-tracked.
 That, in the opinion of the House, the government should develop and publicly release within 120 days following the adoption of this motion a comprehensive plan to expand the economic immigration stream to allow workers of all skill levels to meet the full range of labor needs and pathways to permanent residency for temporary foreign workers, including international students, with significant Canadian work experience in sectors with persistent labor shortages, and such plan should incorporate the following elements:
 (a) amending eligibility criteria under economic immigration programs to give more weight to significant in-Canada work experience and expand the eligible occupational categories and work experience at various skills levels.
 (b) examining evidence and data gathered from recent programs such as Temporary Resident to Permanent Resident Pathway, Atlantic Immigration Program (AIP), Rural and Northern Immigration Program (RNIP), and Agri-Food Pilot, and Provincial Nominee Process (PNP).
(c) incorporating data on labor market and skills shortages to align policy on immigrant-selection with persistent laborgaps.
 (d) assessing ways to increase geographic distribution of immigration and encourage immigrant retention in smaller communities, as well as increase Francophone immigration outside Quebec.
 (e) identifying mechanisms for ensuring flexibility in immigration-selection tools to react quicker to changes in labor market needs and regional economic priorities; and
 (f) specifically considering occupations and essential sectors that are underrepresented in current economic immigration programs, such as health services, caregivers, agriculture, manufacturing, service industry, trades, and transportation.
 The decision for easier Canada PR has also been taken after acknowledging that international students and temporary foreign workers are an important part of Canada's economy. This new strategy will now help by laying out new opportunities of employment and by supporting community and regional needs. As per the official release, with this, the government's aim is to strengthen the connections between labor market and the immigration programs.
 Contact Team Sia Immigration for the further assistance on Motion – 44 today. Book your free consultation Now. 
Source Link: https://www.siaimmigration.com/blog/new-Motion-44-Plan
0 notes