#Canada’s immigration system

[stepwiseimmigrations3]

Immigration Backlog Canada – All You Need To Know

Immigration Backlog Canada – All You Need To Know

As we all know, Canada is famous worldwide due to its policies and strict guidelines. But Canada has always been a dream of everyone to have permanent residency in Canada. But as time changes, things become more difficult for the public, and they face issues getting PR for Canada. The main problem arose after the pandemic, resulting in a big loss of jobs and Canada’s economy. However, the Canadian government has made some changes in the immigration backlog Canada to boost the process of PR for Canada. Thus, it results in a huge benefit in Canada PR backlog for immigrants. Do not roam here and there if you have a Canada express entry backlog. Get some time and meet our experts today at Stepwise Immigrations. We are the best immigration experts and help clients with a Canada visa backlog. Let’s read more on this topic about the immigration backlog Canada.

To reduce backlogs in immigration, IRCC has released an action plan.

Honorable Sean Fraser, Minister of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship, has offered an update on immigration, refugees, and citizenship Canada’s ongoing efforts to tackle application backlogs. In addition, he has also shared some facts on how Canada plans to update its immigration system to meet unusual applicant demands. Stepwise Immigrations experts will help you if you have any Canada visa with 40 backlogs. We are always ready to help our clients as we believe in helping our clients anytime. Meet our experts today at our office to find more facts about Canada express entry backlog.

Inventories with backlogs

As a result of humanitarian crises and pandemic-related upsets, IRCC is facing notable delays in processing applications due to what the Minister has defined as “unusual interest in Canada as a destination for newcomers from around the world.” Recent months have seen the department hassled its efforts to reduce backlogs, which are applications that have been in the system for longer than expected. As a result of the Minister’s new report, applicants have now more details on how to predict this plan to work.

IRCC will hire an extra processing team

You will be happy to know that IRCC is planning to hire up to 1300 new workers to boost their labor power and tackle the backlog Canada immigration. As part of the Economic and Fiscal Update 2021, IRCC received an additional $85 million in funding. By hiring more processing staff, current average processing times will be reduced, and the norms of pre-pandemic service will slowly be patched.

There will be an update in standard processing time

The latest reports stress specific critical areas in which pre-pandemic benefit bars will return very soon. It includes a Canada express entry backlog, which will return to a six-month service bar. And there will be a 12-month service standard for Spousal Sponsorship. Take the aid of Stepwise Immigrations today to get your Canada visa with 40 backlogs. We are the best experts in Canada who are always ready to help our clients.

Our Other Articles :

Agents For Canada Study Visa – Full Guide

Study in Canada Consultants in Chandigarh

Canada Study Visa Consultants In Delhi – Study in Your Dream Destination

BC PNP For International Students

Best Immigration Lawyer Brampton

Best Immigration Agency Canada

Canada Work Permit Without LMIA

Immigration Consultant In Delta

Changes to eligibility needs and program delivery

Furthermore, IRCC is improving existing tools and enforcing new policies to lower application processing times. There have been marked changes, including:

Applicants living in Canada and meeting specific criteria are exempt from the Immigration Medical Examination need:

The change will be executed in TR and PR applications in the coming weeks.

Applications for Spousal Sponsorship may be interviewed virtually:

Virtual interviews are open to applicants who are unable to attend in-person interviews. Furthermore, the bureau raised a pilot project that will allow applicants for Spousal Sponsorship (to be announced soon) to conduct virtual discussions rather than going to an overseas visa office.

Applications for permanent residence in digital format:

IRCC will begin shifting to 100% digital PR applications to update the delivery of permanent residence programs.

Among the enhancements to the online citizenship application tool are the following:

Applicants seeking residency can now apply together through the online citizenship portal. In addition, they can do virtual rites last year and take digital citizenship tests. The system will be updated by the end of this year to include minor applicants.

Applicants will have access to their application progress

IRCC plans to post a monthly data report online to keep the applicants in a form on the headway of the backlog list. Furthermore, a tracking system for PR applications via sponsorship was introduced by IRCC in February 2022. In spring 2023, this status tracking system will be expected to have seven additional PR and TR programs. For two years, applicants have been greatly affected by uncertainty related to application processing times. The IRCC admits this hindrance and notes that further advances will improve the accuracy of the info. As a result, they aim to provide applicants with an estimate of when the application will be processed, increasing predictability for them. Eager to find info about Canada immigration backlog news. Take the aid of now from Stepwise Immigrations experts.

 Statistics and targets for immigration

Despite the backlog, there is still a backlog of permanent and temporary residence applicants at IRCC. Over 275,000 permanent residents have been admitted to Canada since the start of this year. Compared to the previous year, this number has been reached in the fastest timeframe. The number is also more than halfway toward IRCC’s goal of admitting 431,000 permanent residents this year. The number of work permits issued during the same period surpassed 349,000, and the number of study permits issued exceeded 360,000. Furthermore, these numbers exceed the last records in a great way.

Reach our team today to meet the experts and get ready to fly a Canada visa with 40 backlogs.

Contributing to the economic growth of Canada

IRCC recognizes the importance of improving Canada’s immigration system in implementing this plan. By doing so, more newcomers will be able to enter Canada, whether as students, temporary workers, or permanent residents. Canada will benefit from a stronger arrival system and will be able to address its existing labour dearth. Wish to have more data about the backlog Canada immigration. Meet the best team in Canada at Stepwise Immigrations.

Summary,

Seeking the Canada visa backlog experts. Reach the best experts now at Stepwise Immigrations. Our experts will offer you the latest Canada immigration backlog news. This happens because we are the expert team, and our client depends on us without any stress. Make a call now or schedule your meeting with our experts.

FAQs

Why is Canadian visa taking longer 2022?         

This pandemic is also responsible for the sudden surge in visa applications.

How long does it take to hear back from Immigration Canada?    

It will take about 30 days to hear back from Immigration Canada.

What is Canada Immigration backlog?

It means that the application takes a long time to process. There is no reply from the immigration service after 180 days.

What is the current wait time for PR in Canada?

The waiting time for PR in Canada is about six months.

[if-you-fan-a-fire]

"In these circumstances, the commercial economy of the fur trade soon yielded to industrial economies focused on mining, forestry, and fishing. The first industrial mining (for coal) began on Vancouver Island in the early 1850s, the first sizeable industrial sawmill opened a few years later, and fish canning began on the Fraser River in 1870. From these beginnings, industrial economies reached into the interstices of British Columbia, establishing work camps close to the resource, and processing centers (canneries, sawmills, concentrating mills) at points of intersection of external and local transportation systems. As the years went by, these transportation systems expanded, bringing ever more land (resources) within reach of industrial capital. Each of these developments was a local instance of David Harvey's general point that the pace of time-space compressions after 1850 accelerated capital's "massive, long-term investment in the conquest of space" (Harvey 1989, 264) and its commodifications of nature. The very soil, Marx said in another context, was becoming "part and parcel of capital" (1967, pt. 8, ch. 27).

As Marx and, subsequently, others have noted, the spatial energy of capitalism works to deterritorialize people (that is, to detach them from prior bonds between people and place) and to reterritorialize them in relation to the requirements of capital (that is, to land conceived as resources and freed from the constraints of custom and to labor detached from land). For Marx the

wholesale expropriation of the agricultural population from the soil... created for the town industries the necessary supply of a 'free' and outlawed proletariat (1967, pt. 8, ch. 27).

For Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari (1977) - drawing on insights from psychoanalysis - capitalism may be thought of as a desiring machine, as a sort of territorial writing machine that functions to inscribe "the flows of desire upon the surface or body of the earth" (Thomas 1994, 171-72). In Henri Lefebvre's terms, it produces space in the image of its own relations of production (1991; Smith 1990, 90). For David Harvey it entails the "restless formation and reformation of geographical landscapes," and postpones the effects of its inherent contradictions by the conquest of space-capitalism's "spatial fix" (1982, ch. 13; 1985, 150, 156). In detail, positions differ; in general, it can hardly be doubted that in British Columbia industrial capitalism introduced new relationships between people and with land and that at the interface of the native and the nonnative, these relationships created total misunderstandings and powerful new axes of power that quickly detached native people from former lands. When a Tlingit chief was asked by a reserve commissioner about the work he did, he replied

I don't know how to work at anything. My father, grandfather, and uncle just taught me how to live, and I have always done what they told me-we learned this from our fathers and grandfathers and our uncles how to do the things among ourselves and we teach our children in the same way.

Two different worlds were facing each other, and one of them was fashioning very deliberate plans for the reallocation of land and the reordering of social relations. In 1875 the premier of British Columbia argued that the way to civilize native people was to bring them into the industrial workplace, there to learn the habits of thrift, time discipline, and materialism. Schools were secondary. The workplace was held to be the crucible of cultural change and, as such, the locus of what the premier depicted as a politics of altruism intended to bring native people up to the point where they could enter society as full, participating citizens. To draw them into the workplace, they had to be separated from land. Hence, in the premier's scheme of things, the small reserve, a space that could not yield a livelihood and would eject native labor toward the industrial workplace and, hence, toward civilization. Marx would have had no illusions about what was going on: native lives, he would have said, were being detached from their own means of production (from the land and the use value of their own labor on it) and were being transformed into free (unencumbered) wage laborers dependent on the social relations of capital. The social means of production and of subsistence were being converted into capital. Capital was benefiting doubly, acquiring access to land freed by small reserves and to cheap labor detached from land.

The reorientation of land and labor away from older customary uses had happened many times before, not only in earlier settler societies, but also in the British Isles and, somewhat later, in continental Europe. There, the centuries-long struggles over enclosure had been waged between many ordinary folk who sought to protect customary use rights to land and landlords who wanted to replace custom with private property rights and market economies. In the western highlands, tenants without formal contracts (the great majority) could be evicted "at will." Their former lands came to be managed by a few sheep farmers; their intricate local land uses were replaced by sheep pasture (Hunter 1976; Hornsby 1992, ch. 2). In Windsor Forest, a practical vernacular economy that had used the forest in innumerable local ways was slowly eaten away as the law increasingly favored notions of absolute property ownership, backed them up with hangings, and left less and less space for what E.P. Thompson calls "the messy complexities of coincident use-right" (1975, 241). Such developments were approximately reproduced in British Columbia, as a regime of exclusive property rights overrode a fisher-hunter-gatherer version of, in historian Jeanette Neeson's phrase, an "economy of multiple occupations" (1984, 138; Huitema, Osborne, and Ripmeester 2002). Even the rhetoric of dispossession - about lazy, filthy, improvident people who did not know how to use land properly - often sounded remarkably similar in locations thousands of miles apart (Pratt 1992, ch. 7). There was this difference: The argument against custom, multiple occupations, and the constraints of life worlds on the rights of property and the free play of the market became, in British Columbia, not an argument between different economies and classes (as it had been in Britain) but the more polarized, and characteristically racialized juxtaposition of civilization and savagery...

Moreover, in British Columbia, capital was far more attracted to the opportunities of native land than to the surplus value of native labor. In the early years, when labor was scarce, it sought native workers, but in the longer run, with its labor needs supplied otherwise (by Chinese workers contracted through labor brokers, by itinerant white loggers or miners), it was far more interested in unfettered access to resources. A bonanza of new resources awaited capital, and if native people who had always lived amid these resources could not be shipped away, they could be-indeed, had to be-detached from them. Their labor was useful for a time, but land in the form of fish, forests, and minerals was the prize, one not to be cluttered with native-use rights. From the perspective of capital, therefore, native people had to be dispossessed of their land. Otherwise, nature could hardly be developed. An industrial primary resource economy could hardly function.

In settler colonies, as Marx knew, the availability of agricultural land could turn wage laborers back into independent producers who worked for themselves instead of for capital (they vanished, Marx said, "from the labor market, but not into the workhouse") (1967, pt. 8, ch. 33). As such, they were unavailable to capital, and resisted its incursions, the source, Marx thought, of the prosperity and vitality of colonial societies. In British Columbia, where agricultural land was severely limited, many settlers were closely implicated with capital, although the objectives of the two were different and frequently antagonistic. Without the ready alternative of pioneer farming, many of them were wage laborers dependent on employment in the industrial labor market, yet often contending with capital in bitter strikes. Some of them sought to become capitalists. In M. A. Grainger's Woodsmen of the West, a short, vivid novel set in early modern British Columbia, the central character, Carter, wrestles with this opportunity. Carter had grown up on a rock farm in Nova Scotia, worked at various jobs across the continent, and fetched up in British Columbia at a time when, for a nominal fee, the government leased standing timber to small operators. He acquired a lease in a remote fjord and there, with a few men under towering glaciers at the edge of the world economy, attacked the forest. His chances were slight, but the land was his opportunity, his labor his means, and he threw himself at the forest with the intensity of Captain Ahab in pursuit of the white whale. There were many Carters.

But other immigrants did become something like Marx's independent producers. They had found a little land on the basis of which they hoped to get by, avoid the work relations of industrial capitalism, and leave their progeny more than they had known themselves. Their stories are poignant. A Czech peasant family, forced from home for want of land, finding its way to one of the coaltowns of southeastern British Columbia, and then, having accumulated a little cash from mining, homesteading in the province's arid interior. The homestead would consume a family's work while yielding a living of sorts from intermittent sales from a dry wheat farm and a large measure of domestic self-sufficiency-a farm just sustaining a family, providing a toe-hold in a new society, and a site of adaptation to it. Or, a young woman from a brick, working-class street in Derby, England, coming to British Columbia during the depression years before World War I, finding work up the coast in a railway hotel in Prince Rupert, quitting with five dollars to her name after a manager's amorous advances, traveling east as far as five dollars would take her on the second train out of Prince Rupert, working in a small frontier hotel, and eventually marrying a French Canadian farmer. There, in a northern British Columbian valley, in a context unlike any she could have imagined as a girl, she would raise a family and become a stalwart of a diverse local society in which no one was particularly well off. Such stories are at the heart of settler colonialism (Harris 1997, ch. 8).

The lives reflected in these stories, like the productions of capital, were sustained by land. Older regimes of custom had been broken, in most cases by enclosures or other displacements in the homeland several generations before emigration. Many settlers became property owners, holders of land in fee simple, beneficiaries of a landed opportunity that, previously, had been unobtainable. But use values had not given way entirely to exchange values, nor was labor entirely detached from land. Indeed, for all the work associated with it, the pioneer farm offered a temporary haven from capital. The family would be relatively autonomous (it would exploit itself). There would be no outside boss. Cultural assumptions about land as a source of security and family-centered independence; assumptions rooted in centuries of lives lived elsewhere seemed to have found a place of fulfillment. Often this was an illusion - the valleys of British Columbia are strewn with failed pioneer farms - but even illusions drew immigrants and occupied them with the land.

In short, and in a great variety of ways, British Columbia offered modest opportunities to ordinary people of limited means, opportunities that depended, directly or indirectly, on access to land. The wage laborer in the resource camp, as much as the pioneer farmer, depended on such access, as, indirectly, did the shopkeeper who relied on their custom.

In this respect, the interests of capital and settlers converged. For both, land was the opportunity at hand, an opportunity that gave settler colonialism its energy. Measured in relation to this opportunity, native people were superfluous. Worse, they were in the way, and, by one means or another, had to be removed. Patrick Wolfe is entirely correct in saying that "settler societies were (are) premised on the elimination of native societies," which, by occupying land of their ancestors, had got in the way (1999, 2). If, here and there, their labor was useful for a time, capital and settlers usually acquired labor by other means, and in so doing, facilitated the uninhibited construction of native people as redundant and expendable. In 1840 in Oxford, Herman Merivale, then a professor of political economy and later a permanent undersecretary at the Colonial Office, had concluded as much. He thought that the interests of settlers and native people were fundamentally opposed, and that if left to their own devices, settlers would launch wars of extermination. He knew what had been going on in some colonies - "wretched details of ferocity and treachery" - and considered that what he called the amalgamation (essentially, assimilation through acculturation and miscegenation) of native people into settler society to be the only possible solution (1928, lecture xviii). Merivale's motives were partly altruistic, yet assimilation as colonial practice was another means of eliminating "native" as a social category, as well as any land rights attached to it as, everywhere, settler colonialism would tend to do.

These different elements of what might be termed the foundational complex of settler colonial power were mutually reinforcing. When, in 1859, a first large sawmill was contemplated on the west coast of Vancouver Island, its manager purchased the land from the Crown and then, arriving at the intended mill site, dispersed its native inhabitants at the point of a cannon (Sproat 1868). He then worried somewhat about the proprieties of his actions, and talked with the chief, trying to convince him that, through contact with whites, his people would be civilized and improved. The chief would have none of it, but could stop neither the loggers nor the mill. The manager and his men had debated the issue of rights, concluding (in an approximation of Locke) that the chief and his people did not occupy the land in any civilized sense, that it lay in waste for want of labor, and that if labor were not brought to such land, then the worldwide progress of colonialism, which was "changing the whole surface of the earth," would come to a halt. Moreover, and whatever the rights or wrongs, they assumed, with unabashed self-interest, that colonists would keep what they had got: "this, without discussion, we on the west coast of Vancouver Island were all prepared to do." Capital was establishing itself at the edge of a forest within reach of the world economy, and, in so doing, was employing state sanctioned property rights, physical power, and cultural discourse in the service of interest."

- Cole Harris, “How Did Colonialism Dispossess? Comments from an Edge of Empire,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 94, No. 1 (Mar., 2004), p. 172-174.

[br1ghtestlight]

anyway ppl who are gonna be like "im moving to canada!!!!" after this election uhhh. well i wouldn't recommend it lol

[awkward-teabag]

Can't even mention that a store near me is clearly using abusing the TFW program because they refuse to pay little more than minimum wage in a high cost of living area (also you won't get benefits and you'll only be part-time) because the fascists and right-wingers will jump in to say it's about immigration and white replacement.

No, it's because rich white people want to hoard even more money and found an intentional loophole to both make more money (via paying employees less) and also have more power over employees, employees who may or may not know Canadian employment laws (or safety laws) and even if they do, don't have the ability or support to try to hold the company accountable.

You can absolutely criticize the federal government for keeping the loophole open but it predates Trudeau by decades and it was Harper who both expanded the program and added a way for companies to fast-track TFWs. It was also under Harper that companies started firing Canadians (or not hiring them) and then requesting permission to mass-hire TFWs instead.

But the way the right wing talks, you would think Trudeau started this whole thing and the poor multi-million and multi-billion dollar companies are being taken advantage of. Also that housing prices, lack of new developments, and zoning issues started with Trudeau and are the fault of mass-immigration he has a boner for instead of being an issue for decades and experts warning this would happen if governments didn't act ASAP.

Instead the neolibs and cons kept cutting back and kicking that can down the road, a can that started being kicked by Mulroney and the Conservative Party.

[lebizcanada20]

[youreonyourownkid]

am in toronto 🥳

[abhishekdigi-blog]

Dreaming of Practicing Dentistry in Canada? Here’s How!

Are you a dentist looking to immigrate to Canada? The Express Entry Program is your golden ticket! Here’s a quick guide to get you started:

Eligibility: Hold a dental degree and have at least 1 year of work experience.

Language Proficiency: Aim for a strong score in English or French.

Create Your Profile: Set up your Express Entry profile on the IRCC website.

Receive an ITA: Get an Invitation to Apply based on your CRS score.

Submit Your Application: Complete your application for permanent residency.

Canada is actively seeking skilled dentists! With high demand, excellent quality of life, and career growth opportunities, it's time to take the leap!

[expresswayimmigration]

Express Entry Draw #309 | 3,200 CEC Candidates Invited

IRCC’s Latest Express Entry Draw #309 Invites 3,200 CEC Candidates The Latest Canadian Express Entry draw held on August 14, 2024. In Express Entry draw #309, a total of 3,200 candidates from the Canadian Experience Class (CEC) were invited, with the lowest Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) score being 509. Today’s draw marked the 4th Canadian Experience Class (CEC) specific program draw of…

[credasmigrations]

Now is the perfect moment to begin your journey to Canada by using in-depth Express Entry Programme information! We can help you with everything from the eligibility examination to getting your Confirmation of Permanent Residence.

[cmcimmigration23]

What is the average processing time for express entry Surrey, Canada?

Introduction:

Welcome to CMC Immigration Services! As a leading provider of immigration solutions, we understand the importance of accurate information and timely updates for those navigating the Express Entry system in Surrey, Canada. In this blog, we’ll delve into the average processing times for Express Entry applications, offering insights and guidance for individuals seeking to make Surrey their new home. Read More.

[lebizcanada20]

Top Strategies for Maximizing Your Chances in Category-Based Draws

Category-based draws may seem like a game of chance, but there are strategic ways to increase your chances of coming out on top. By analyzing past winners and understanding the selection criteria, you can gain valuable insights into how to position yourself for success.

Play to Your Strengths

One effective strategy is to focus on entering categories where you have a competitive advantage. By showcasing your expertise and experience in a specific field, you can set yourself apart from other participants and increase your chances of being selected.

Diversify Your Entries

While it's important to play to your strengths, it's also beneficial to diversify your entries across multiple categories. This not only increases your overall odds of winning but also allows you to explore new opportunities and expand your skill set.

Stay Up to Date

To maximize your chances in category-based draws, it's crucial to stay informed about the latest trends and developments in your chosen categories. By staying ahead of the curve, you can tailor your entries to align with current industry standards and preferences.

Network and Collaborate

Building connections within the community of participants can also work in your favor. By networking with other entrants and potential collaborators, you can gain valuable insights and support that may improve your chances of success.

In recent weeks, several outlets have indicated that many immigration candidates are expressing concern over high CRS cut-off scores. Thus far in 2024, there has not been a general Express Entry draw with a minimum/cut-off CRS score below 524.

CRS scores for category-based selection draws in 2024

IRCC has conducted eight category-based Express Entry draws to date this year.

Compared to IRCC’s nine general and program-specific draws this year, the department’s CRS cut-off for category-based draws has been at least 33 points lower in every 2024 draw.

Specifically, IRCC’s eight category-based draws so far this year breakdown as follows:

Accordingly, Express Entry candidates who are concerned about obtaining a CRS score that is high enough for IRCC’s general draws may find value in pursuing an ITA through IRCC's category-based Express Entry draws, as this allows eligible candidates to benefit from a generally lower CRS cut-off requirement.

Am I eligible for category-based selection?

To be eligible for an ITA through a category-based Express Entry draw, candidates must meet a unique set of criteria depending on the category they fall under.

More: Visit this dedicated webpage for more details on all six categories, and to see if you may be eligible for IRCC’s category-based draws, depending on your NOC code and other criteria.

Specifically, in addition to meeting all the requirements included in the instructions for a specific round of invitations, applicants must meet additional criteria depending on the applicable category.

French language proficiency category

Have a minimum score of 7 in all four language abilities (speaking, reading, writing and listening) on the Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens (NCLC)

More: In April, IRCC announced that French language proficiency will account for the majority (30%) of ITAs issued through category-based draws this year.

Occupational categories

In 2024, IRCC has chosen to focus on immigration candidates with eligible work experience in the following five industries:

Healthcare

STEM

Trades

Transport

Agriculture and Agri-Food

All occupational categories eligible for category-based selection require candidates to have at least six months of eligible full-time, continuous (or equivalent part-time) work experience in the last three years. This work experience may have been obtained in Canada or abroad.

Note: Although the list of eligible National Occupation Classification (NOC) codes varies based on the occupational category, qualifying work experience must have been obtained in a single occupation under one of the qualifying NOCs in a given category.

[globalgatewaysblr]

Get expert advice for Canada Express Entry System seamlessly with Global Gateways. Get Germany job seeker Visa and discover job opportunities to work Abroad.