#BATTLE OF HYDASPES
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Video
SCYTHIAN-WOMEN-ART-PAINTINGS-WARRIORS-BATTLE OF THE HYDASPES-ALEXANDER THE GREAT-SLAVIC BEAUTY-ERNEST DESCALS-ARTIST-PAINTER por Ernest Descals Por Flickr: SCYTHIAN-WOMEN-ART-PAINTINGS-WARRIORS-BATTLE OF THE HYDASPES-ALEXANDER THE GREAT-SLAVIC BEAUTY-ERNEST DESCALS-ARTIST-PAINTER- At last ALEXANDER THE GREAT was able to face the Scythian warriors in the battle of the Hydaspes, true Amazons who had that kind of wild beauty typical of the Slavs of the steppes. Painting by the artist painter Ernest Descals with watercolors, seeking the expression of determination. Por fin ALEJANDRO MAGNO pudo enfrentarse a las guerreras escitas en la batalla del Hidaspes, verdaderas amazonas que tenían esta clase de belleza salvaje propia de las eslavas de las estepas. Pintura del artista pintor Ernest Descals con acuarelas, buscando la expresión de la decisión.
#SCYTIAN WARRIORS#WOMEN#WOMAN#MUJERES#MUJER#ESCITAS#ESLAVAS#ESTEPAS#AMAZONAS#AMAZON#GUERRERAS#BATALLA DEL HIDASPES#BATTLE OF HYDASPES#SALVAJES#MUJERES SALVAJES#WILD WOMEN#LUCHAR#STRUGGLE#ALEXANDER THE GREAT#ALEJANDRO MAGNO#ALEXANDROS#HISTORIA#HISTORY#SLAVIC BEAUTY#DECISION#EXPRESION#EXPRESIONES#EXPRESSION#EXPRESSIONS#ART
1 note
·
View note
Text
The Phalanx Attacking the Centre in the Battle of the Hydaspes by André Castaigne (c. 1898-99)
79 notes
·
View notes
Photo
The Hyphasis Mutiny
The so-called Hyphasis Mutiny was a conflict between Alexander the Great (356-323 BCE) and his army following their victory at the river Hydaspes in 326 BCE. Alexander voiced plans for further conquests in the Indian subcontinent, however, when his men reached the river Hyphasis, there was an open revolt. The mutiny ended with Alexander giving in to his men's wishes and turning back; he did not venture further into the Indian subcontinent as he intended. Over the years, historians have examined the importance of this moment of tension between a king and his army. This includes the issue of whether the term “mutiny” can truly apply to this incident.
The Indian Campaign
When Alexander marched across the Hindu Kush to India in 327 BC, the denizens of Bazira feared for their lives, fled to the Aornos Rock, reputed to be impregnable so that not even Heracles was able to capture it. Alexander had difficulty getting to the rock and started building a mound, then gained a foothold on a hill. When the Indians noticed the Macedonians closing in, they surrendered. Alexander placed a garrison on the abandoned portion of the Aornos Rock.
The city of Nysa asked Alexander to recognize their freedom and independence, which Alexander granted and made allies of them, acquiring 300 horsemen. He also had a base in Taxila, after promising to help Taxiles against his enemy, King Porus. Alexander met Porus at the Battle of Hydaspes in 326 BCE, which included war elephants. After the battle, Porus was allowed to continue ruling his kingdom and became an ally of Alexander, and Alexander continued to march further into India.
Continue reading...
35 notes
·
View notes
Note
Shows or movies based on historic figures and events are hard to pull off if the goals are to be both entertaining and somewhat true to history. If we accept that some inaccuracies can't be avoided in order to appeal to audiences what would you consider cornerstones and pillars about Alexander and his history that can't/shouldn't be touched in order to paint a somewhat realistic picture in media based on him and his life?
How to Make a Responsible Movie or Documentary about Alexander
I saved this to answer around the time of the Netflix release. For me, there are four crucial areas, so I’ll break it down that way. Also. I recognize that the LENGTH of a production has somewhat to do with what can be covered.
But, first of all…what story is one telling? The story arc determines where the focus lies. Even documentaries have a story. It’s what provides coherence. Is it a political tale? A military one? Or personal? Also, what interpretation to take, not only for Alexander but those around him. Alexander is hugely controversial. It’s impossible to make everyone happy. So don't try. Pick an audience; aim for that audience.
MILITARY:
Alexander had preternatural tactical skills. His strategy wasn’t as good, however, especially when younger. Tactics can be a genius gift (seeing patterns), but strategy requires experience and knowledge of the opposition. The further into his campaign, the more experience he gained, but the cultures became increasingly unfamiliar. He had ups and downs. He was able to get out of Baktria finally by marrying Roxana. That was strategy, not tactics. He beat Poros, then made a friend of him; that’s strategy. Yet he failed to understand the depth of the commitment to freedom among the autonomous tribes south along the Indus, which resulted in a bloody trek south. And his earlier decision to burn Persepolis meant he’d never fully reconcile the Persian elite.
So, it’s super important to emphasize his crazy-mad tactical gifts in all forms of combat, from pitched battles to skirmishes to sieges. Nobody in history ever equaled him except maybe Subatai, Genghis Khan’s leading general. In the end, I think that’s a lot of Alexander’s eternal fascination. He fought somewhere north of 250 battles, and lost none (where he was physically present).
But HOW to show that? What battles to put on screen? Oliver Stone combined three into one + Hydaspes because he had only 2-3.5 hours (depending on which cut you watch). The Netflix series is going to show all four of the major pitched battles…or at least all 3 for the 6-episode first part. They had circa 4.5 hours to play with, but they cut out other things, like Tyre.
Another issue, from the filming/storytelling point-of-view is how to distinguish Issos from Gaugamela for the casual viewer. They’re virtually identical in tactics (and players on the field). So it made a fair bit of sense to me for Stone to conflate them. In a documentary, it’s more important to separate them, largely to discuss the fall-out.
Some v. important clashes weren’t the Big Four. Among these, the sieges of Halikarnassos and Tyre are probably the most impressive. But the Aornos Rock in India was another amazing piece. I’d also include the bridging of the Indus River to illustrate the astonishing engineering employed. Again, if I had to pick between Halikarnassos and Tyre, I’d pick Tyre. I was a bit baffled by Netflix’s decision to show Halikarnassos instead, but I think it owed to an early error in the scripts, where they had Memnon die there. I corrected that, but they’d already mapped out the beats of the episodes, so they just kept Halikarnassos. That’s fine; it was a major operation, just not his most famous siege.
Last, I really wish somebody, someday, will do something with his Balkan campaigns. What he did in Thrace and Illyria, at just 21, showed his iron backbone and quick thinking. It’d make a great “and the military genius is born” set-up, drama wise. But you could use the Sogdian Rock to show the clever streak, at least (“Find men who can fly” … “I did; look up.” Ha) Plus it has the advantage of being where he (maybe) found Roxana.
Last, he fought extremely well--wasn't just good at tactics. Being a good general doesn’t necessarily mean one’s a good fighter. He was. Almost frighteningly brave, so show that too.
RELIGIOUS:
Ya gotta deal with the “Did he really think he was a god?” thing, and the whole trip to Siwah. I obviously don’t think he believed he was a god; it’s one of the things I disliked about the Netflix show’s approach, but they were dead-set on it. I DO think he came to believe he was somehow of divine descent, but of course, that’s not the same as most moderns understand it, as I’ve explained elsewhere. It made him a hero, not a god on a level with Zeus, and to ME, that’s an important distinction that Netflix (and to some degree Stone) rode roughshod over.
But I’d like to see more inclusion of sacrifice and/or omen-reading—religion in general. Cutting the Gordion Knot (omens!). His visit to Troy (Netflix tackled that one). A really cool thing would be to make more of the lunar eclipse before Gaugamela. Again, Netflix touched on that, but it’s one of those chance events that might actually have affected a battle’s outcome, given how seriously the ancient near east took sky omens. (A solar eclipse once halted a battle.) The Persians were freaked out. Even his massacre of the Branchidai in Sogdiana was driven by religion, not military goals. Pick a couple and underscore them.
I give Stone big props for the sacrifice before the Granikos/Issos/Gaugamela battle. It was so well-done, I’ve actually shown it in my classes to demonstrate what a battlefield sphagia sacrifice would look like.
Alexander was deeply religious. Show it.
POLITICAL:
Ah, for ME the most interesting stuff surrounding Alexander occurs at the political level. Here’s where the triumph story of his military victories all went south. He knew how to win battles. He was less good at managing what he’d conquered.
In terms of a story arc, the whole period up to Gaugamela is really the “rise” of the story. Post-Gaugamela, things began to collapse. And I would pin the turn on PERSEPOLIS. Yes, burning it sent home a message of “Mission accomplished.” But he was selective about it. Areas built by Darius I were spared, Xerxes’ were destroyed: a damnio memoriae.
Problem: Persepolis embodied Persia, and ATG essentially shat on it. Not a good look for the man who wanted to replace Darius III. That he also failed to capture and/or kill Darius created an additional problem for him. Finally, his lack of understanding of how politics worked in Baktria-Sogdiana resulted in an insurgency. Bessos was going to rebel, regardless. But Spitamanes might not have. Alexander created his own mess up there.
Another matter to look at is why he created a new title—King of Asia—instead of adopting the Persian title (King-of-Kings). I don’t think that was a “mistake.” He knew perfectly well the proper Persian title (Kshāyathiya)…and rejected it. He adopted some Persian protocol, but not all of it. After the summer of 330, he was essentially running two parallel courts, which seemed to satisfy neither the Persians nor his own men. (Kinda like docudramas are a hybrid that seems to annoy perhaps more than satisfy.)
So I’d like to see this handled with some nuance, but it’s intrinsically difficult to do—even while, if done well, it would be the most interesting part of an Alexander story, imo.
So, what events, what events…3-4 leap out after Alexander’s adoption of some Persian dress. The Philotas Affair, the Pages Conspiracy, the Death of Kleitos, the marriage to Roxana. I’d show it all, although I could also understand reducing the two conspiracies to one, for time, in which case, the Philotas Affair because it resulted in the fall of Parmenion. But the fact there were two, not just one, tells a story itself.
What about the proskynesis thing with Kallisthenes? I’ve come to disbelieve it ever happened, even though it’s symbolic of the whole problem. So, weirdly, I’m of two minds about showing it. OTOH, it won’t be in my own novels. But OTOH, I could easily see why a showrunner or director might want to include it. And it certainly appears in several of the histories, including Arrian.
Then we have the two indisciplines (mutinies)…one in India that made ATG turn around, and another at Opis. They’re really two different things as one was an officer’s rebellion, the other the soldiers themselves. But will viewers be able to distinguish between them? It’s like the Issos/Gaugamela problem, or for that matter, the two conspiracies. They’re similar enough to confuse the casual viewer. “Didn’t we already see that?”
But if they were narrowed to one, how to choose? The mutiny on the Hyphasis provides an explanation for why he turned back. But the Opis event was more dramatic. The man jumped down into the middle of a rioting crowd and started (essentially) knocking heads together! So if I had to pick…Opis. The other might could be mentioned in retrospect.
PERSONAL:
Here are five things I think really OUGHT to be shown, or that I have yet to be pleased by.
1) Philip isn’t an idiot and should get more than 10 minutes of screentime. Oh, and show Alexander did learn things from him. Stone had to make his movie a Daddy-Issues flick, and the Netflix thing did very little with Philip as they wanted to get to the Alexander-Darius face off (which was the meat of their story). But there’s a very interesting love/competition story there.
2) Olympias is not a bitch and was not involved in Phil’s murder, although I can see why that is catnip to most writers. She did kill Eurydike’s baby and (by extension) Eurydike. One of the historians in the Netflix story (Carolyn, unless I misremember) talked about the rivalry between the two wives, at least. But I think ATG planned to marry the widow and Olympias got rid of her to prevent it. Now THAT’S a story, no? But they were in too much of a hurry to get to Persia.
3) Alexander was not an only child! He had sisters (and a brother) with whom he was apparently close…and a cousin who was his real rival. To me, missing that cousin rivalry overlooks a juicy personal/political story! Too often all the focus winds up on Alexander-Olympias-Philip-Eurydike-Attalos, but man, a more subtle showrunner could do a lot with the Alexander-Amyntas rivalry. But he’s constantly cut out. I can’t think of a documentary that actually addresses Amyntas except in passing (if at all)l
4) Hephaistion’s importance is a must, but I’d like to see him treated as someone with a personality and authority of his own, besides just as ATG’s lover. At least Netflix Went There onscreen with the love-story part, but otherwise, the writers couldn’t figure out what to do with him. Neither Stone nor Netflix really portrayed him as his own person. I do understand why they can’t show the whole cast of characters. I had to do weeding myself in the novels, but I’m annoyed Netflix showed only Hephaistion and Ptolemy. Where’s Perdikkas (so important all along really, but certainly later)? Or Philotas, Kleitos, Krateros, Leonnatos, Lysimachos (later king of Thrace)? I think viewers could probably have handled at least another 5 people, especially if introduced gradually, not all at the beginning.
This brings me to….
5) Alexander’s apparently very real affection for the people in his orbit, from personal physician (Philip) to childhood pedagogue (Lysimachos [not same as above]) to Aristotle to various other philosophers. He was so loyal to his friends, in fact, he initially jailed the people who brought word of Harpalos’ first flight.
He needed to be loved/appreciated and wanted to give back to people. Yes, generosity was expected of kings, and as a king (THE king), his generosity had to excel that of anybody else. But he seemed to genuinely enjoy giving presents. I think of him like that one friend who heard you say you liked that cute pair of “Hello, Kitty” socks…then 6 months later they’re your Christmas present from them. Some of his gifts were grandiose, but not always. I love the dish of little fish (probably smelts) that he sent to Hephaistion, presumably just because his friend liked smelts!
To me, point #5 would be easy to get in with a skilled scriptwriter, tucked into the corners of other scenes. It’d be fun to highlight the personal side. If we can believe Plutarch, he was a PRODIGIOUS letter-writer. Also, he loved to hunt, so that’s another thing. And he loved the theatre, and to watch sport. These would all be very humanizing details.
I think the biggest issue is that most of these documentaries/docudramas are done by people who don’t know squat about Alexander aside from a few things, before deciding to make a documentary/movie about him, or write a book. Their research is shallow, and even if they bring on the experts, they don’t always listen. Stone DID at least have a long fascination with ATG, but it caused him to try to throw in everything but the kitchen sink. It wasn't as bad of a film as some have made it out to be, just horribly bloated and for all his reading, he never understood the WORLDVIEW. I wrote about that some while back in my review.
The best documentary/movie would be told by an actual specialist who knew enough at the outset to craft a better, more complex story arc.
Or maybe I’m just biased because I tried to do that myself in my novels. 😂😂😂😂
#asks#alexander the great#oliver stone alexander the great#netflix alexander the great#telling the story of alexander the great is intrinsically difficult#docudramas#historical movies#historical documentaries
96 notes
·
View notes
Text
iris
"but ceaseless war's upon us! time and again i've gone to battle, fought with men but i've never seen an army great as this. too much - like piling leaves or sand, and on and on they come, advancing across the plain to fight before our gates." - the iliad, book 2
︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵
family
iris was the daughter of thaumas (the personification of the wonders of the sea & an old sea god) & elektra (also known as ozomene, oceanid nymph & possibly a cloud nymph of storm clouds illuminated by the sun). she is the granddaughter of pontos (also known as pontus, primordial god of the sea), & gaia (also known as gaea, primordial goddess of earth); & also the granddaughter of tethys (primordial titan goddess of fresh water nourishing the earth) & oceanus (also known as okeanos, primordial titan god of the great river okeanos, all fresh water - wells, springs, rivers, rain clouds -, & regulated which divine beings rose & set from his waters).
her siblings include the harpies (also known as the harpyiai & personifications of strong gusts of wind), arke (also known as arce), & hydaspes (a river god of northwestern india). the harpies have quite a few names; aello, okypete, podarge, okypete-okythoe-okypode, aellopos-nikothoe, kelaino, & podarke-aellopos. the harpies were depicted as either winged women sometimes depicted with ugly faces, or winged women with the lower bodies of birds. arke was the messenger of the titans (before being replaced by ithax) & took the side of the titans in the gods vs titans war & got her wings cut off by zeus as a punishment. she was sent to tartarus. often, a faded rainbow is a sign of arke.
unlike many other gods, iris only had one lover; zephyros (also known as zephyrus). zephyros was one of the four seasonal wind gods (also known as the anemoi), the god of the west wind, & the god of spring. together, they had pothos (also known as pothus), the god of sexual longing, desire, & yearning. pothos was considered one of the erotes. the erotes (winged love gods) were a trio comprised of eros, himeros, & pothos. additionally, some sources say iris & zephyros are also the parents to eros; however, eros' parents were also said to be aphrodite & either zeus, hermes, ares, or hephaestus.
while iris only had zephyros as a lover, he on the other hand had quite of few lovers and children with them. in addition to fathering pothos & possibly eros, he is the father of xanthos (also known as xanthus) & balios (also known as balius), arion (also known as areion), karpos (also known as carpos), & the tigers. xanthos & balios were a pair of immortal horses gifted to peleus from poseidon, their mother was podarge, one of the harpies & iris' sister. arion was also an immortal horse who was said to be the fastest (or one of the fastest) horses; he had several people who owned him, such as onicus the arkadian, heracles, & adrastus. his parents were debated as either being poseidon & demeter, gaia, or zephyros & one of the harpies (suspected of being podarge). karpos was the goddess of fruits on the earth, her parents are zephyros & chloris (also known as khloris). some people say that karpos is actualy karpo (also known as carpo), same role but a god instead of a goddess.
︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵
about the goddess
iris was the first messenger for the gods & the goddess of rainbows. after hermes assumed her former messenger duties, iris became a servant of hera. according to the iliad, though, iris was the main one to relay messages from zeus & hera to people - not hermes. besides being a messenger & the goddess of rainbows, iris is said to assist those with grieving & death as well. she is also present whenever the gods would make oaths, a pitcher in her hands filled with water from the river styx. whenever a god or goddess lied, they'd fall into a deep slumber for a year - this was all, of course, due to iris. besides being a messenger, iris would serve the gods nectar from her golden pitcher as well. nectar was seen as a delicacy, i'm assuming.
oftentimes in art, iris is indistinguishable from hebe. whilst both goddesses were very, very different from each other, they were identical in artistic depictions of them. iris was thought to be shown as a gorgeous young woman with golden wings, a water pitcher in hand, & a herald's rod. sometimes her pitcher was depicted with nectar in it, other times it was water from the river styx. iris was often shown to be by zeus or hera's side, further affirming her role as a messenger.
this goddess is connected to rainbows, communication, truth, grieving, rain, the sea, messages, and new journeys. she is one of a handful of gods that were allowed to travel between the underworld & the depths of the sea. much like hermes, if you pray but don't know who to pray to, iris likely will.
she is described as being incredibly fast. iris delivers messages & disappears just as fast as she appeared. whilst she isn't in charge of any domain in particular, iris is loyal to the 12 olympians - namely hera. due to her quick nature, usually you can see where she's been from rainbows. she's very colorful (obviously). i personally don't think she enjoys conflict very much. i feel she's a very soft-natured goddess as well.
︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵
festivals
little is known about how iris was worshipped. there are no valid sources i've found discussing festivals dedicated to her, though i imagine people would invoke her for various reasons. although, the island of delos was known to offer her basymiae (type of cheescake made from wheat-flour, suet, & honey).
while i can't find a festival for her, nor a sacred day, belgium has a holiday called iris day on may 8, which is celebrated to mark the victory over the germans in world war II. additionally, people celebrate this day as a victory for democracy & a loss for facism. may 8 is significant to them as it's the feast day of their patron saint, saint michael.
fun fact: france's national flower is the iris, & tennessee picked the iris to be their state flower.
there is no known day for this goddess, unfortunately :(.
︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵
symbols
postage stamps/cards, rainbows, feathers, water, prisms
flowers/incense/crystals/scents
frankincense, aura quartz, violet, moonstone, iris, sunstone, rainbow obsidian, myrrh, labradorite
sacred colors
all of them!
sacred animals
hummingbirds, other brightly colored creatures (especially birds)
sacred day
unknown
tarot cards
ten of cups, page of swords, temperance
offerings
wine, fig cakes, learning about her, spending time in nature, milk, honoring her & her family, using color theory, cloud gazing, writing poetry, baking cheesecakes for her, donating to charities focused on peace/ending wars, working on being in tune with emotions, honey, sending postcards to people, artwork, looking for rainbows (rainbow gazing?), olive oil
epithets
dewy, wonderous one, golden footed, blessed, of fair sandals, storm-footed, daughter of thaumas, wind-swift
︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵
sources
#deity identification#witchblr#paganblr#hellenic deities#deity work#hellenic polytheism#iris#messenger gods#hellenic worship#rainbow goddess#deity worship
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
New CGL Sized Hex Base & Restocks are in from Iron Wind Metals!
20-5089 Cizin Hover Tank (2) 20-5117 Kodiak II (Standard) 20-5140 Ostscout OTT-7J 20-5173 Scourge SCG-WF1 20-5187 Dominator 20-5204 Stormwolf Prime 20-5214 Jade Phoenix Prime 20-715 Jagatai Prime 20-785 Demolisher II Tank 20-885 Hermes II HER-2S 99-202 Large Flat Top Hex Base #2 99-207 Large Flat Top Hex Base #3 BT-008 Void Battle Armor BT-098 Visigoth Micro Fighter BT-104 Jagatai Micro Fighter BT-108 Tyre Micro Fighter BT-112 Sulla Micro Fighter BT-120 Sabutai Mech Scale Fighter BT-141 Hydaspes Micro Fighter BT-144 Lancer Micro Fighter BT-147 Zero Micro Fighter BT-148 Dagger Micro Fighter BT-149 Eisensturm Micro Fighter BT-152 Vandal Micro Fighter BT-168 Vulcan Micro Fighter BT-202 Rogue Bear Heavy Battle Armor BT-207 Delphyne ProtoMech BT-216 Archangel Dominus BT-239 Jump Support Infantry BT-245 Heavy Infantry - Firing BT-303 Vulture Mk III Prime BT-317 Thor II A BT-331 Phoenix Hawk LAM MK I PHX-HK1 (Mech) BT-364 Gabriel Hovercraft BT-368 Cecerops Protomech BT-369 Elemental Battle Armor (3) BT-372 Savannah Master Hovercraft BT-381 Basic Inner Sphere Battle Armor (3) BT-463 War Crow A BT-472 Wolverine WVR-7M / 7M2 / 7K FT-017 Scytha Mech Scale Fighter FT-019 Kirghiz Mech Scale Fighter 20-400D Puma "Adder" Prime Arm Sprue 20-456C Typhoon RAC Variant RAC Gun Sprue 20-727B Karnov UR Transport Rotor / Blade 20-864B Hatchetman Arm Sprue
#battletech#alphastrike#ironwindmetals#battletechalphastrike#miniatures#catalystgamelabs#battlemech#battletechminiatures#battletechpaintingandcustoms#classicbattletech#miniaturewargaming#mechwarrior#mecha#gaming#boardgames#tabletop#tabletopgames#tabletopgaming#wargaming#wargames#hobby#scifi#sciencefiction#miniaturepainting#mech#6mmminis#6mmscifi#dougram#gundam#robotech
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
ok so my history ass really wants to talk about this but here’s this cool headcanon I have but let’s talk about The Horse Ever.
Nono, not Poland’s Horse. Sorry Feliks and the rest of my blood kindred.
So this is Alexander the Great and his horse, Bucephalus (literally meaning Ox-Head)
According to legend, Bucephalus basically was impossible to tame and Alexander was just “alright, I got this” and basically was the only one who tamed this majestic beast. But basically for much of Alexander’s life, Bucephalus was basically his beloved son on four legs who went into countless battles with Alexander. Unfortunately, Bucephalus was killed in the Battle of Hydaspes (somewhere around modern-day Punjab) and Alexander was really, really distraught to see his beloved hoof son slain in battle. However, Alexander literally made a city where Bucephalus is slain in honor of his beloved horse.
You might be asking “Cheebs! What the FUCK does this have to do with Hetalia?!”
Oh, you’re getting to the Good Part, my friend.
So Ancient Rome (before being Christianized) and Ancient Greece basically had the same gods, right? (Only difference being renamed, like Zeus = Jupiter, Hermes = Mercury, etc). But Alexander’s conquest basically laid the seeds to the beginnings of the Roman Empire.
So we got Ancient Rome in his youth, when the Gods basically called upon him, seeing this young Rome as the one chosen to be the very personification of the young republic and beyond. Jupiter, basically being the King of the Roman Gods (basically Roman Zeus) was the one who basically bestowed a resurrected Bucephalus to Rome himself, for the gods see him as a worthy successor to Alexander to lead the newly-established Republic (and soon, Empire)
Rome’s Bucephalus was just like Alexander’s Bucephalus personality-wise. Rome knew about Alexander’s conquest, but he did eventually tame Bucephalus and basically the two were inseparable, even when Rome had to abandon his own gods who bestowed his best friend and comrade-in-arms. For those years Rome and Bucephalus rode together in battle, from the siege of Carthage, the fight against his greatest enemy, Germania, and many, many internal conflicts. However...
The death of Bucephalus was also the death of Rome, just like the day Bucephalus died at the Battle of Hydaspes. Unlike Alexander, Rome basically died alongside his long-time friend during the day his empire fell, knowing that he will at least die alongside his best friend and longtime comrade his former gods bestowed upon him.
In much of the stuff I work with, whenever I draw Rome, I always have to draw Bucephalus alongside him (see below)
Bucephalus basically is like the one cat who only likes one person (Rome) and hates everyone else, mostly jealousy. Someone not Rome trying to mount Bucephalus? Prepare to get some broken bones! Rome is talking to someone else? “FATHER, WHY DO YOU NOT GIVE ME ATTENTION???”
But nonetheless, Bucephalus and Rome are quite literally best friends!
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
— Alexander the Great in 326 BCE after the Battle of Hydaspes.
Bucephalus is dead.
904 notes
·
View notes
Text
More Watch : https://tinyurl.com/34dxkn3c Viral Vedio Today Battle of Hydaspes, Porus defeated the general in the battle Watch Now :https://tinyurl.com/4x5dxftm #viralbareng #sharadpawar #love #JesusisLord #Rosie #Davido #Wizkid #SteveBannon #Mandela #Flash #Wordle #RII7E_Or_NONE #BringBack #SeunghanRosie #Wizkid
#archaeology#batman#baking#artists on tumblr#bedroom#bibliophile#billford#authors#bill cipher#black lives matter
1 note
·
View note
Video
BATALLA-HIDASPES-ARTE-PÌNTURA-ALEJANDRO MAGNO-ELEFANTES-REY-POROS-INDIA-PAKISTAN-ACUARELAS-PINTOR-ERNEST DESCALS por Ernest Descals Por Flickr: BATALLA-HIDASPES-ARTE-PÌNTURA-ALEJANDRO MAGNO-ELEFANTES-REY-POROS-INDIA-PAKISTAN-ACUARELAS-PINTOR-ERNEST DESCALS- Acuarelas que priman el movimiento y la atmósfera, la BATALLA del HIDASPES, elefantes del Rey Poros contra la Caballería Macedonia de ALEJANDRO MAGNO, llegando a los límites del mundo para ampliar el nuevo Imperio conquistado, en su afán, el Rey de Macedonia y nuevo Gran Rey de Persia luchó en las tierras de Pakistán y la India. Pintura con acuarela sobre papel del artista pintor Ernest Descals, historia y Arte se fusionan.
#BATALLA DEL HIDASPES#BATTLE OF THE HYDASPES#INDIA#PAKISTAN#ELEFANTES#ELEPHANTS#CABALLERIA#MACEDONIA#ALEJANDRO MAGNO#ALEXANDER THE GREAT#REY POROS#KING POROS#MACEDONIAN CAVALRY#HETAIROI#BATALLAS#ARTE#ART#ARTWORK#ACUARELA#ACUARELAS#WATERCOLOUR#WATERCOLORIST#WATERCOLOR#ACUARELISTAS#PLASTICA#HORSE#HORSES#PINTAR#MOVEMENT#MOVIMIENTO
0 notes
Photo
Diodorus Siculus' Account of the Life of Semiramis
Semiramis is the semi-divine Warrior-Queen of Assyria, whose reign is most clearly documented by the Greek historian Diodorus Siculus (l. 90-30 BCE) in his great work Bibliotheca Historica ("Historical Library") written over thirty years, most probably between 60-30 BCE. Diodorus drew on the works of earlier authors, such as Ctesias of Cnidus (l. c. 5th century BCE).
Ctesias (whose works only exist now in fragments) was ridiculed for inaccuracy by other ancient writers, but his accounts are treated as reliable by Diodorus who cites him without reservation.
While modern historians are divided on whether an historical personage named Semiramis ever lived, Diodorus presents her life as a straightforward biographical account of the reign of a great Assyrian queen. As there is only one known queen in the history of Assyria, the regent Sammu-Ramat (r. 811-806 BCE), Semiramis has been identified with her since the 19th century, when archaeological excavations began to uncover Assyrian cities and decipher ancient Mesopotamian inscriptions.
Diodorus' Storytelling
Diodorus does not concern himself with when, or even if, such a queen lived and devotes his energies instead to telling the epic tale of an intelligent, beautiful, and clever queen who rose from humble beginnings to rule all of Mesopotamia, Anatolia, and Central Asia. It seems clear that he borrowed certain events in Semiramis' life from other tales, whether historical or mythical, but this does not seem to have concerned him as long as the story was a good one.
An example of this in the text below is Semiramis' invasion of India, which is very similar to that of Alexander the Great. In 327 BCE, Alexander invaded India with his army, and one of his greatest challenges at the Battle of the Hydaspes River (also known as The Battle of Jhelum) in 326 BCE was the war elephants of King Porus of Paurava. Diodorus, in his account of Semiramis' invasion, could not realistically give her army elephants and so, it is thought, he added in the story of the make-believe elephants to even the odds on the field and make for a better tale. Diodorus' addition of the fake elephants, however, is an example of what makes his works so interesting to read: he never seems to have allowed the truth to get in the way of a good story.
Continue reading...
41 notes
·
View notes
Note
This question usually comes up framed as “did Alexander know about China?” - but what I really want to ask is: how aware was Alexander of what was to the East of his conquests?
He reached India, so he must have known that there were kingdoms / civilizations / countries that form what we presently call India as well. Was he aware of say, Tibet? Or Southeast Asia? I’m fairly certain Alexander and China didn’t know about each other, but if Alexander initially wanted to expand to the east, what did he know about it?
I suspect this changed as he moved east. The wall of the Himalayas is pretty steep. I'm not sure the route that would become the Silk Road was really open yet; it dates to the first century BCE. Alexander did encounter silk, but I believe it was in India. Silk starts popping up in the West after Alexander, although, again, some limited silk coming via Persia (via India) is older.
That said, when the army hit Marakanda/Samarkand, which was ON the later Silk Road, it's entirely possible that he'd have heard something. I doubt it would have been very clear, however.
It's really in India that he'd have heard more. After the Battle of the Hydaspes, the army hung out in Poros's lands for a bit. That's where he heard enough about the extremely warlike nations further into India--as did the army--that led to the indiscipline at the Hyphasis. In fact, some scholars have suggested Alexander actually *staged* the indiscipline, to give him an excuse to turn around. He knew he didn't have enough troops to take on the kingdoms in central India.
How much he heard about China beyond that, I don't know. It would depend on how much was known in the Punjab region.
But certainly, Alexander's army returned with a lot more information about Central Asia, and further east, than had been known before.
Strabo's Geography (Roller has the complete collection translated) is probably the best place to look. He used a number of the now-lost Alexander historians, when writing, and even evaluates the reliability of these.
#Alexander in the East#Alexander in India#Alexander in Baktria#Bactria#Poros#Strabo#Alexander the Great#asks#Classics
25 notes
·
View notes
Video
youtube
Alexander the Great: The Final Stand
Join us on a historical journey with Alexander the Great as we explore his final stand. In this kings and generals documentary, we dive into the epic tale of one of the most legendary figures in ancient Grecian history. I stand at the precipice of history, a conqueror, a dreamer, a man whose name will echo through the ages. I, Alexander, have carved my path through the heart of empires, from the sun-baked plains of Persia to the lush valleys of Punjab. The Achaemenid Empire fell before me like a house of cards, its once-mighty walls crumbling under the weight of my ambition. I tasted victory at Gaugamela, the thrill of triumph coursing through my veins as I gazed upon the remnants of Darius’ forces, scattered like leaves in the wind. But here, at the banks of the Hydaspes, I find myself face to face with Porus, a king as fierce as the storms that rage across the skies. His elephants tower over my men, a living wall of muscle and might, yet I am undeterred. I have faced the fiercest warriors, crossed deserts and mountains, and still, I press on. The thrill of battle is intoxicating, the promise of glory beckoning me forward. Yet, as the clash of steel fills the air, I sense a tremor beneath my feet, a whisper of dissent among my ranks. My soldiers, weary from the endless march, their spirits frayed like old cloth, they look to me with eyes that once sparkled with the fire of conquest. Now, they speak of home, of the familiar comforts left behind, and I feel the weight of their longing. I am their leader, their king, yet I am also a man, and I understand their fears. The dream of India, of further conquests, begins to fade like the evening sun. I am forced to turn back, to abandon the vision that once burned so brightly in my heart. The world I sought to conquer slips through my fingers like sand, and I am left with the haunting echo of what might have been.
0 notes
Photo
Restocks are up from Iron Wind Metals for BattleTech!
10-038 Command Lance 20-049 Samarkand Carrier 20-272 Sturmfeur Tank 20-275 HEAVY APC - TRACKED (2) 20-292 Hermes HER-1A 20-303 HEPHAESTUS SCOUT TANK 20-439 Dart DRT-3S / DRT-4S 20-460 Pegasus Scout Hover Tank (2) (3058) 20-462 Sunder SD1-O Prime 20-463 Striker Light Tank (2) (3058) 20-5007 Turhan Wheeled Vehicle (2) 20-5018 Karhu KHU-R1 20-5040 Mad Cat MKII (Enhanced) 20-5050 Thunder THR-1L 20-5055 Hunchback HBK-7R 20-5074 Dola DOL-1A1 20-5080 Vulture MK IV Prime 20-5089 Cizin Hover Tank (2) 20-5106 Tiburon 20-5116 Stalker II STK-9A 20-5126 Gun GN-2O Prime 20-5131 Centurion CN11-O Prime 20-5135 Vandal LI-O Prime 20-5189 Catapult CPLT-C3 / C5 20-5205 BattleMaster BLR-1G / 1Gb 20-623 SRM Carrier (2) 20-671 REGULATOR HOVERTANK (2) 20-692 HERCULES HRC-LS-9000 20-701 SPARROW HAWK SPR-H5 20-715 Jagatai Prime 20-723 Warrior Helicopter H-7 20-726 YELLOW JACKET GUNBOAT 20-751 Long Tom Artillery LT-MOB-25 20-800 Hex Bases (4) 20-849 Centurion CN9-A 20-854 Hunchback HBK-4G 20-857 UrbanMech UM-R60 20-864 Hatchetman HCT-3F 20-894 Firefly FFL-4B 20-903 BLACKWATCH BKW-7R 20-919 STOOPING HAWK PRIME 20-957 LAO HU LHU-2B 20-961 SHA-YU MECH SYU-2B 20-988 Phoenix Hawk PXH-4L 20-990 LIGHTRAY LGH-4W 20-999 Wasp WSP-3L 20-9122 Battleforce Hex Base 99-201 Large Flat Top Hex Base #1 99-203 Extra Large Flat Top Hex Base AC-002 Small Space Base AC-004 Medium Space Base BT-006 Phalanx Battle Armor BT-007 Rottweiler Battle Armor BT-009 Trinity (Ying Long) Battle Armor BT-052 Confederate BT-066 Scout ATV BT-067 Golem Battle Armor BT-074 Corsair Micro Fighter BT-097 Chippewa Micro Fighter BT-107 Transgressor Micro Fighter BT-121 Black Lion Battlecruiser (2750) BT-122 McKenna Battleship (2750) BT-128 Tornado Battle Armor BT-132 Clan Medium Battle Armor BT-133 Corona Battle Armor BT-141 Hydaspes Micro Fighter BT-187 Djinn Battle Armor BT-190 Purifier BA A (standing, wpn. forward) BT-191 Purifier BA B (crouching) BT-192 Purifier BA C (2 pc) (advancing) BT-194 Purifier BA E (standing, wpn. to side) BT-197 Aerie Battle Armor BT-198 Tengu Battle Armor BT-199 Asura Md. Battle Armor BT-200 Shedu Assault Battle Armor BT-201 Nephilim Assault Battle Armor BT-202 Rogue Bear Heavy Battle Armor BT-205 Interdictor Pocket Warship BT-208 Triton ProtoMech BT-209 Se'irim Medium Battle Armor BT-222 Tau Wraith BT-223 Tau Zombie BT-224 Heavy Jump Infantry BT-227 Thunderbird Battle Armor BT-230 Kopis Battle Armor BT-232 Warg Battle Armor BT-237 Recon Infantry BT-238 VTOL Infantry BT-260 Sprint Scout VTOL BT-321 Hover APC BT-335 PWWKA S-PW-1LAM (Air Mech) BT-339 Yurei S-YR-1LAM (Fighter) BT-358 Carrier Dropship BT-364 Gabriel Hovercraft BT-370 Kurita Infantry (3) BT-371 Davion Infantry (3) BT-372 Savannah Master Hovercraft BT-376 Minotaur Protomech BT-381 Basic Inner Sphere Battle Armor (3) BT-382 Kanazuchi Battle Armor BT-383 Longinus Battle Armor (3) BT-385 Grey Death Legion Battle Armor (3) BT-386 Undine Battle Armor (3) BT-387 Gnome Battle Armor (3) BT-390 Fa-Shih Battle Armor (3) BT-391 Fenrir Battle Armor (1) BT-393 Kage Battle Armor Squad (4) BT-410 Sarath SRTH-1OB BT-413 Marauder Battle Armor BT-414 Niso Attack WiGE (Standard & Support) BT-424 Hellspawn HSN-7D Resculpt BT-427 Balac Strike VTOL (Standard) & (LRM) BT-439 Black Wolf Battle Armor BT-443 Typhoon TFN-3A / 3M / 5H Mech Scale Fighter DL-679 Atlas Museum Scale LTD-Omega Omega Super Heavy Mechs OP-110 XXL Launcher Plates 20-988D Phoenix Hawk Jump Jet Sprue
https://ariesgamesandminis.com/index.php/shopping/category/12-iron-wind-metals.html
#battletech #alphastrike #ironwindmetals #claninvasion #miniatures #catalystgamelabs #battlemech #mechwarrior #mwo #mecha #tabletop #tabletopgames #tabletopgaming #wargaming #wargames #hobby #scifi #sciencefiction #miniaturepainting #mech #hovertank #6mmminis #6mmscifi #feldherr #dougram #gundam #robotech #armypainter #thearmypainter #chessex
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Who was Alexander’s horse?
#Alexanderthegreat #greekhistory #buchepalus June 326 B.C. Death of Buchepalus – Alexander the Great’s Horse Although Alexander won the Battle of Hydaspes and defeated Porus, he lost his horse #buchepalus. He could not sustain the injuries and lost his life.This horse had accompanied him through all his conquests and Alexander was deeply saddened by the loss of his beloved horse.Follow for more…
View On WordPress
0 notes