#Accountancy for sale

[beastwhimsy]

quilted pillowl... so soft and snuggly! $40 starting price, highest offer after a week will get the design! offer down below in the comments. check the original post for the highest offer so far. CURRENT: $45

[lnmei]

💥 CLUMP ✂️

I’m excited to finally show a bit of what I’ve been drawing all year 💥 my new 90-page corporate comedy sci-fi (?) comic CLUMP will be exhibiting as part of @shortboxcomicsfair this October! I hope you check it out on company time ♥️

[bumbl-buzz]

We have many MANY new buddies in our Etsy! Link in bio! Or DM us for more info! All the ones here are our new ones!

We are a small art business meaning all monies from sales go to paying our bills and pampering our cat (who just got a new stroller FYI). We appreciate all likes and shares and comments! Thank y’all!! (Ok shameless plug over)

Prices:

Bats: $45

Manta rays: $35

Ps. The spiderweb bats glow in the dark!

[rocketbirdie]

he is dead

[jindadraws]

Amethyst’s Steven Universe Future design>>>

✨💫Holographic prints available here!💫✨

[cutiecloeee]

Rebloog this for free pic 🙄🥰

[vacant2007]

extremely silly creature

[nochangeintheplan]

Preorder will go live on my kofi at 1:00 PM EST on April 6th!

Shipping is 6 USD for United States, 20 USD for Worldwide. Shipping is possible to any country covered by USPS. If your country has any specific shipping stipulations that you know of, when it comes time for the preorder you'll have my email to contact me about any of those extra concerns!

There will be 100 made; manufacturing is currently underway for the lil guys. I'll be sure to update my kofi with further info about the process as it goes along!

[strawberryartgallery]

Commission Information!

New Year, New commissions set up! All my prices are now listed on Weebly to keep updating simple! Currently there are no new Price changes, however I have no updated complex features to be 50% of the base price per character.

If you have an inquires or would like to commission me; you may contact me on the following sites.

Cara

FurAffinity

Instagram

Patreon

E-mail: strawberryoverlordart@gmail.com

Drop a tip to my Ko-fi or Patreon!

[cakedpied]

buzz designed by @marzipanpisser a while ago

[multicolouredgoose]

SOLD 🎃✨

[beeftendergroin]

(wip) an early 2000s babygirl room for my favourite (belated) birthday girl

[blu0nion]

New stuff on my shop soon ;)

Shop will be on maintenance mode until it goes live at 6pm (GMT) this evening

Sale on everything until the 6th!

[sunnylighter]

Posting this because I'm mad, but I really want people to stop soliciting me on fanfiction.net. These are just some of the ones I've been getting lately. I have done everything short of blocking all notifications from there entirely, which I don't want to do because some people still there actually still read my stories and give nice reviews. I want to keep interacting with them. I also get the occasional request to beta-read someone's fic, and I enjoy doing that as well.

But recently only 1 in every 10 messages from there were actually from people who like my work and want to talk to me about it. Instead, I keep getting messages from these fuckers and their copy-and-past little sales pitches. Usually, it's in PMs, but the most recent one was in a review of my fic. Considering this particular comment was on chapter 1, I highly doubt they actually read my fic. You can tell from how their messages are so similar and yet despite claiming to have read my fics and that they were great, they fail to mention any details about them. Were the characters portrayed right, if they like a plot twist I put in, a particular moment that was especially sad, or funny, or got them hyped? Nothing. Just, 'Hey, I like your work, buy my shit'.

I'm not even sure if there are real people behind these accounts. The account pages are usually pretty empty aside from linking their profiles on other sites, and maybe a handful of random favorite stories or authors. And all of them were new accounts started in late August of this year. Honestly, I'm pretty sure a lot of them are bots or some kind of scam. I wouldn't be surprised if any 'art' bought off these accounts were just made with AI.

Whatever the case, I don't trust it and really advise against anyone buying from these people. If you want commissions based on your fics, please research and reach out to artists yourself instead of giving money to these annoying snake-oil salesmen.

I love fanart of my fics. I greatly appreciate anyone who chooses to make fanart of my fics, and adore seeing it so, so much. But if I ever decide I want a commission, I will reach out to you, not the other way around. If anyone knows more about why this is happening and how to get them to leave me alone, please let me know.

[odinsblog]

This is an illegitimate and deeply corrupt Supreme Court.

“I must respectfully decline your invitation," Roberts wrote in the letter to Dick Durbin (D-Ill), which was released by a spokesperson for the high court.

Durbin responded to the refusal in a statement Tuesday.

“Make no mistake: Supreme Court ethics reform must happen whether the Court participates in the process or not,” Durbin said in the statement.

He also noted that he was surprised that the chief justice had amended his letter with a statement meant to provide “clarity” to the public about how the justices consider ethics issues.

Durbin dismissed the statement as a “recounting of existing legal standards of ethics” and said that Roberts’ suggestion that current law is adequate “ignores the obvious.”

“It is time for Congress to accept its responsibility to establish an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Court, the only agency of our government without it,” Durbin said.

👉🏿 https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/25/politics/john-roberts-congress-supreme-court-ethics/index.html

Unsurprisingly, this is not the first time that the malfeasance of SCOTUS has been a problem.

Flashback 2012:

Roberts rejects calls that the justices should be subject to the basic code of ethics that governs all other federal judges and must provide some transparency to their recusal decisions. His argument seems based on the proposition that the justices are good people and able jurists — so they don’t have to be officially bound by a code or explain decisions governing their conduct or recusal.

In Roberts’s view, these good jurists should not have to explain how their decisions conform to the law. Yet the courts’ fundamental legitimacy rests on the notion that judges apply the facts to the law impartially and explain what they have done in reasoned opinions for all to read. Roberts’s position mocks that.

👉🏿 https://www.politico.com/story/2012/01/roberts-to-america-trust-us-071895