#2024 rnc

[deadpresidents]

Is J. D. Vance the worst vp pick of your lifetime?

My lifetime has included Sarah Palin, John Edwards, and Dan Quayle, so Vance isn't even in the conversation, unfortunately.

[reading-writing-revolution]

What we learned from the RNC...not much.

[odinsblog]

Unfortunately he didn’t stay fired

👉🏿 https://www.gawkerarchives.com/hulk-hogan-dont-let-one-racist-slur-on-tape-define-my-1727693531

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Aaron Rupar and Stephen Robinson at Public Notice:

Between President Biden announcing he’s stepping aside, his endorsement of VP Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party turning the presidential race on its head by quickly rallying around her, and JD Vance immediately crashing and burning as Trump’s VP pick, this week has been a historic one in American politics — so much so that last week’s RNC feels like a distant memory.

But it’s worth devoting some attention to how the press did Trump’s work for him by portraying the aspiring authoritarian exactly how he wants to be seen — as a heroic strongman and newfound champion of political unity. Trump accepted the Republican presidential nomination for a third time on July 17 with a rambling, incoherent mess of a speech that offered a terrifying vision for America during its rare moments of coherence. His performance was widely regarded as a disaster. But a range of major newspapers didn’t cover it that way. More than a few headlines actually raved about it. The Boston Globe: “In a departure, Trump calls for unity, healing in America.” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: “Trump urges unity after assassination attempt while proposing sweeping populist agenda.” Baltimore Sun: “Subdued Trump describes assassination try, accepts nomination.” As media critic Parker Molloy pointed out, these papers seemingly reported on Trump’s speech based on the prepared remarks, not the speech as he actually delivered it.

[...]

Trump will never pivot to unity because his whole brand is divisiveness

Not long after Trump’s attempted assassination at a Pennsylvania rally on July 13, mainstream outlets went along with the Trump campaign’s narrative: The shocking event had changed him for the better. When Trump made his first appearance at the RNC on July 15, the New York Times described him as “subdued” and claimed he showed a “glimpse of vulnerability.” But Trump had already demonstrated he was unchanged earlier that day when he posted on Truth Social that his idea of “Uniting our Nation” was the dismissal of all criminal charges against him.

Trump spewed his usual invective against his political foes throughout the week. The media, nonetheless, continued to take seriously the idea that he was a new man. Axios reported on July 15 that Trump “plans to seize the his moment by toning down his Trumpiness” and MSNBC’s Katy Tur described his first appearance at the RNC as “serene.” But the most egregious instance of this genre was a piece from Politico’s Natalie Allison, who wrote on July 17 that “there appears to be a new softness to Donald Trump, with people who’ve talked to him describing him with words like ‘existential,’ ‘serene,’ ‘emotional’ and even ‘spiritual.’”

[...] Largely left out of the coverage of the assassination attempt on Trump is the fact he not only has glorified political violence in the past but continues to do so — one of his central campaign promises is to pardon January 6 insurrectionists convicted of crimes. And he also wants to make it easier for people to obtain weapons of war like the one that shot at him and killed a man in the process.

The press sold a faulty narrative that Donald Trump is a “changed man” and a “unifier” in the wake of the assassination attempt, but in reality Trump was the same old unhinged turd that he always was.

[ophilosoraptoro]

"The Deep State Mafia is running both political parties" Journalist Whitney Webb reveals

[nando161mando]

Idiocracy the movie plays out in the RNC

[davidaugust]

📱❌😝

[jacks-weird-world]

NBC N ͤws In ͭ ͤ ͬ ͮ ͥ ͤw

Jack Schlossberg, the cousin of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., said he would not be surprised if former President Donald Trump and RFK Jr. ended up working together eventually.

🎥: NBC News/YouTube.

[victusinveritas]

[deadpresidents]

Watching Donald Trump lie, go off on wild tangents, and ramble for 90 minutes makes it abundantly clear that it doesn't matter how old Joe Biden is if he is the Democratic nominee: if Donald Trump is the other option, this country cannot survive four more years of him, the cult of personality that supports him, and the Project 2025/MAGA ideology that they want all of us to live under. We can't survive four more years of his policies, we can't survive four more years of his divisiveness, we can't survive four more years of the way he makes us feel and act and think as a people, and we can't survive four more years of him appointing ultraconservative federal judges who will be able to spend the decades that follow using the judiciary to legislate vast and dramatic changes to our daily life, our cultural experiences, and our hopes for a just and righteous future. I don't care what kind of shape Joe Biden is in. He's a better choice than Donald Trump. I don't care if Joe Biden would lose a foot race or a golf game or an arm-wrestling match to Donald Trump. If we have to dig up Ruth Bader Ginsburg, slap a pair of giant sunglasses on her face and Weekend at Bernie's our way through the next four years, THAT is a better choice than Donald Trump. Donald Trump cannot be our President again. There are some things that are impossible, and preserving the already-precarious health of America's democratic republic is an impossibility if Donald Trump becomes President again. ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES, and this is the most consequential election of the lifetime of anybody capable of reading this right now.

[rednblacksalamander]

They didn't teach us about times like these

[refractorind]

Trump at the RNC

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Erin Reed at Erin In The Morning:

On Monday evening, Teamsters President Sean O’Brien made history by speaking at the Republican National Convention—the first time a Teamsters Union President has ever done so. The move, however, didn’t come without controversy. Union Vice President John Palmer called the decision “unconscionable.”

O’Brien then stirred more debate by tweeting in support of an article by Republican Senator Josh Hawley, which criticized corporate initiatives supporting diversity, equity, inclusion, and transgender workers. The situation then erupted when the official Teamsters Twitter account posted a statement condemning O’Brien’s endorsement, which was swiftly deleted. “Unions gain nothing from endorsing the racist, misogynistic, and anti-trans politics of the far right, no matter how much people like Sen. Hawley attempt to tether such bigotry to a cynical pro-labor message. The message this sends to Teamsters of color, Teamster women, and LGBTQ Teamsters is that they are not welcome in the union unless they surrender their identity to a new kind of anti-woke unionism. You don't unite a diverse working class by scoffing at its diversity,” said the now deleted tweet.

O’Brien’s support for Hawley’s views received swift backlash. “We get it. He promised you Secretary of Labor,” read a response by transgender writer Parker Molloy. “If you're a Teamster of color, are LGBTQ+, Sean O'Brien has just said he doesn't give a fuck about you,” said the Daily Union Elections account. “Scab,” said American journalist and labor activist Talia Jane. O’Brien’s speech at the RNC puzzled many observers. He used the platform to advocate for unions while also praising Donald Trump, calling him “one tough SOB.” Throughout much of the speech, the applause was tepid to nonexistent. Reports even indicated that at least one audience member shouted ���right to work,” reflecting anti-union sentiments in the Republican Party.

Meanwhile, other labor union leaders were critical of O’Brien’s appearance at the RNC. Liz Shuler, president of the AFL-CIO, responded, “Donald Trump and J.D. Vance are on the bosses’ side… We won’t be fooled.” These critiques were echoed by members of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, and other union leaders. Even John Palmer, the Teamsters Vice President, weighed in: “A speaking engagement at the Republican National Convention by Teamsters President Sean O’Brien, regardless of the message, only normalizes and makes the most anti-union party and president I’ve seen in my lifetime seem palatable.”

[...] O’Brien’s support for a senator’s explicitly anti-diversity and anti-LGBTQ+ views runs contrary to Teamsters Union’s official documents and policies. One document on the Teamsters website states, “We are pro-union and pro-equality. In keeping with the labor movement motto, ‘an injury to one is an injury to all,’ we support a strong and progressive labor movement that promotes full equality and respect for LGBTQ workers and their families.”

Teamsters leader Sean O’Brien urinated on Teamster ethos of “an injury to one is an injury to all” by not only speaking on the RNC stage Monday but also giving praise to Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO)’s anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-DEI comments. #RNC2024 #RNCinMKE

[thanos-the-dad-titan]

This is hilarious