taintassassin

[taintassassin]

Ditch choice feminism. Your child gets your last name

Choice feminism is a trap. It feels like something designed by the patriarchy to give women the illusion of agency while ensuring that real, systemic change never happens. It’s as if we’re being handed a “burn the patriarchy” sticker and told to sit back down.

Every time a valid discussion come up, someone chimes in with, “But it empowers me! Isn’t feminism about giving women a choice?” No. Just no. Some choices should have never been presented as options in the first place, and others actively harm women as a whole. Feminism isn’t just about individual empowerment. It’s about collective liberation. We need to recognize that many of the “choices” we’re given are designed to maintain the status quo, offering a sense of control while reinforcing the very structures that oppress us.

One of the most fundamental ways to dismantle this system? Give your child your last name. It literally won't cost you anything. You won't lose a job or have government come after you.

Whether or not you plan to have children, start setting this expectation now. Put it in your dating profile. Bring it up casually on a first date. If he argues, walk away because this is not up for discussion.

“But what if I don’t like my family name? What if it carries generational trauma?” You’re about to bring a human into the world who is genetically tied to that very lineage— last name should be the least of your concerns. Take credit for your work, your sacrifice, your legacy. Build a matriarchy.

Governments and institutions are actively working to strip women of autonomy, reducing us to property. This is a simple yet radical way to push back. A patriarchal naming system that has endured for millennia can be undone in a single generation if we refuse to comply.

[taintassassin]

women in stem rn, listen to your thoughts. if you see a problem and think of an invention to fix it, network people who specialize in related fields and BUILD THAT SHIT. PATENT IT. MAKE MOTHERFUCKING HISTORY AND DON’T YOU EVER LOOK BACK, UNDERSTAND? you’re smarter than you think, you’re stronger than you know, you’re more than just a cog in the machine.

"women didn't invent anything"

[taintassassin]

[taintassassin]

this honestly feels like societally normalized grooming of minors.

first, the parent sticks a device in front of their kid’s face to keep them quiet and out of the way, almost as if the parent didn’t let themselves process whether or not they actually like children before they decided to reproduce. and of course they add no or very minimal effort into restricting the types of content and communities their child stumbles upon, so the kid is left defenseless to the internet’s endless array of content, possibly by the ages of 3-7.

then as the child grows older (9-12), either the minor has to grow up fast enough to parent themself on the internet using filters, block features, and active work to keep themself safe, or the minor has to give into peer pressure and sexualize themself before they fully understand what they’re doing. and what minor is gonna do the former, especially when children always assume that they know everything just because they survived their last exposure to something mature and beyond their comprehension? plus, they see the behavior of their friends (which in the age of digital friendship, their friends could easily be closer to their parents’ age), and they feel like they’re missing out on hanging with the more mature group. they want autonomy, and they see older people’s behavior and think that it’s automatically more autonomous because older people have more autonomy in general.

either way, the child grows up too fast. leaving them fully vulnerable to grooming, exploitation, abuse, bullying, exposure to inappropriate material, and other interactions that can literally count towards your ACE (adverse childhood experiences) score. even if they do filter all their socials or just draw and play games instead, both the art and gaming communities are full of exploitation (kids being used as labor to make roblox games or animations for no pay, kids in both communities being funneled into discord servers where fully grown adults have unrestricted access to them, being scammed out of money or bullied/pressured into inappropriate actions like self harm or sharing inappropriate photos, etc).

these kids turn into emotionally stunted adults who are more likely to have mental health disorders, self esteem issues, ptsd-like symptoms, stunted attention spans, struggles with emotional intimacy, desensitization to extreme content, disconnection from reality, insomnia, weakened emotional regulation skills, decision fatigue, and an increased sense of personal failure, among other issues that make it really difficult to function as an adult, as well as making it very easy for them to be manipulated, pressured, abused, and exploited in the future, even making it feel normal to them.

kids matter because they’re people. they have emotions just like you and i. and they don’t even understand all of them, even as teenagers. expecting them to make decisions like this for themselves is entirely unfair and selfish. but that’s just the culture we live in, isn’t it?

“Sorry, 14 year old! Don’t you know it’s your responsibility to filter untagged porn out of your algorithm and feed? We adults have no responsibility to keep the internet safe whatsoever.”

[taintassassin]

NO LITERALLY. the misogynistic scenes and language (especially when describing women. like i don’t think her tits jiggling slightly impacts the scene at all—), the random racism thrown in out of nowhere, and if you found a REAL gem, they’ll throw in some ableism too!!

please, tell me i’m not the only one who hates 1984 by george orwell with all the heart. everyone always describes it as this incredible book that will change your perception of the world, but honestly ... it didn’t. for me.

[taintassassin]

about me

my name is cynthia dolores. you can call me by cynthia or dolores or my assortment of nicknames. (cyn, cece, cyndi, thea, doll, dolly, lo, lola)

i am a spooky, scary, radical feminist. you ought to run, i might just bite you.

i am female and a lesbian. i don't conform to gender so i don't have one.

i am a misandrist as well, i will not be nice to most males and would ask that they dni. also, i call all men males the same way they call women females.

my beliefs as a radfem are that gender should be abolished, along with pornography and the sex industry. you will not find trans hate on my blog as i don't find it to be very conducive to any change, transsexual and transgender people are people and i will fight for their rights to live their life as they wish so long as they do not bother others. i also believe in sex-based oppression.

on my blog you will also find posts about the tv series severance and sometimes the anime that i like. very mixed bag here. but also many a post about female oppression which includes descriptions of rape, abuse, and more. if this upsets you, i recommend staying away.

that's all.

[taintassassin]

love this woman sm she just never backs down. men constantly threaten and attack her and she just keeps getting more and more based.

[taintassassin]

she could do it just to steal money from the dudes she did it with and i’d still support it. y’all call it immoral, i call it sigma female grindset

frankly if a woman chose to go out and get pregnant on purpose just so she can abort it, I would still support her. there will never ever be a circumstance where I oppose or judge a woman for having an abortion. idc

[taintassassin]

i hate when i’m talking to a leftist about why i hate prostitution as a feminist and they hit me with the “all work is slavery under capitalism, you just have a moralistic view of sex” as if i’d disagree.

capitalism is literally antithetical to radical feminism, and i was socialist before i was a radical feminist.

also, why wouldn’t i have a moralistic view of sex? i have a moralistic view of everything; i think everything we do is political, and that includes the kind of sex we have and the rape we find socially acceptable. duh.

[taintassassin]

the new version just came to strengthen the old version

[taintassassin]

Women: hey, so like it would be great if you could research endometriosis

Scientists: sure!

[taintassassin]

men

[taintassassin]

normal people can find ways to rationalize and excuse murder, but not rape. when trying to excuse someone of rape, most of the time its "it doesnt count as rape because of x y and z" and not "they deserved it" (key word most). however, when trying to excuse someone of murder its usually "they deserved it." therefore, socially, rape is considered worse than murder, because its one of the only crimes people cant excuse morally without trying to distance the crime from the word "rape."

however, transandrophobes seem to think that transmascs have it better "only" having the highest rate of corrective rape/forced impregnation and not being killed as often as transfems. ergo transandrophobes think raping a transmasc is morally and materially better than killing them and ending their suffering, when socially rape is equally as bad as murder if not worse.

"transphobes just want to rape and torture detransition and convert transmascs, they want to kill transfems."

if i had a choice between being forcefully impregnated, having to live out my life as a birthing slave and a servant, having my body be permanently mutilated from a parasite, or "just" being brutally shanked to death, id take the shank every time. if i said that under a post about transmisogyny youd never hear the end of it, so why is it okay to make those comments towards transmascs when its universally agreed rape is equally as bad if not worse than murder? the infantilization of their problems needs to stop. what makes anyone think that transmascs have it better?

[taintassassin]

bleeeeeeeeegh people deciding to read my takes wrong and then reblogging the shitty interpretations. i wanna log off but i don’t wanna reopen my tumblr to 8 million angry trans people who’ve decided i’m the reason why they’re oppressed

[taintassassin]

oh boy. let’s unpack this bullshit.

> “this implies that humans cared about genitals as Ontological Spiritual Being”

yeah let me stop you right there buddy. nobody was talking about spirituality in any fashion. we are talking about physicality in relation to societal roles, not spiritual ones. humans have a tendency to categorize and think of people in terms of hierarchy, and don’t even try to tell me otherwise. obviously the wiener analogy was a fucking joke, it’s more about what happens with the genitalia (birth, penetration) that determined what the stereotypes were about why it happened and what that means about the personalities of the people WITH said genitalia.

> “biological sex isn’t when wearing clothes”

yeah sure, because secondary sex characteristics don’t exist and you obviously can’t tell the difference between a male and a female in any way other than genitalia and whatever clothes and makeup you wear. that makes any sense at all.

> “they see us as varying kinds of queers”

oh here the fuck we go again. do you think a bigot is gonna lump all queers together as queer? they treat queers of either sex differently depending on their sex. your comment about the sorting and violence is true, but how do you think they figure that out? please, enlighten me.

> “but why would someone not be experiencing transphobia”

did… did you think i said transphobia doesn’t exist..? no, i said transandrophobia and transmisogyny were missing the point as descriptors for bigotry. obviously it’s still transphobia, but they stem from different places depending on the sex of the person it’s pointed at. this feels like you’re purposely misreading this.

> “well, no because trans women can be punished without being associated with gay men”

of course they can, i’m saying they largely AREN’T. because the main groups of masculine people expressing femininity are effeminate gay men or drag queens, the stereotype is that every male expressing femininity is one. and bigots mostly operate on stereotypes that make up their worldview. as for the comment about trans women experiencing misogyny because of misogyny being a regulatory mechanism for the patriarchy, i somewhat agree, but not in the same way cis women do. it’s a similar misogyny to what all effeminate men face: “you want to be a woman? we’ll treat you like one.” which is also, surprise surprise, A LOT OF WHAT FUELS HOMOPHOBIA. so that part proves my point.

> “don’t write for bulbapedia babes”

don’t call me babes. i’m not your babe. i’m not your friend. you don’t know me.

> ““you can’t call bigotry by who it affects” is very silly”

no it’s not, because that’s not what the fuck i said. i said you can’t beat bigotry by separating it all into microlabels. of course you can label it by who it affects, but it’s different when you break it down past just what the bigotry is ACTUALLY ATTACKING. it doesn’t make sense to call it transmisogyny if the person is attacking you for being effeminate and male. they don’t care that you’re a trans woman in particular, they care that you’re male but not big burly man with lots of chest hair or whatever. which is still bad.

> “respectfully, i don’t think you see the big problem, i think you’re missing the forest for the peens :3”

respectfully, i think YOU’RE the one who missed the forest for the peens. you read my post and decided to hear that i said genitals were all sexism is based off of (i didn’t), that transphobia wasn’t real (i didn’t), and that you can’t label bigotry (i fucking didn’t). you don’t get to tell me whether or not i get the big problem when you can’t even see THE BASIC POINT OF MY POST. thanks for playing.

can not believe i have to say this but guys. misogyny is sex-based. that doesn’t mean that only biological females can experience forms of misogyny, but at its purest form. at its core. it is based on biological sex.

biological sex was probably one of the first differences early humans observed about each other. i know this bc there were no clothes back then, so sausagefests were probably easy to find, and when someone didn’t bring a wiener to the party, people would notice. so it’s my theory that misogyny is one of the earliest forms of bigotry imaginable, and one of the strongest forms that still exists today.

because biological sex is typically an easily observable difference, it’s much more likely for bigotry to be based around that than more subtle differences. not to say that things like transandrophobia and transmisogyny don’t exist, but if you’re talking to a bigot, i don’t think they’re gonna see you as your gender identity. they’re gonna see you as the boxes they know and love, the labels they grew up with. if you’re a transmasc or gnc female, they’re gonna see you as an “ugly” girl, and if you’re transfem or gnc male, they’re gonna see you as a gay man. and they’re going to dole out their bigotry accordingly. so if you’re transmasc and experiencing bigotry around it, you’re most likely experiencing a (maybe slightly altered) version of misogyny, and if you going through similar as a transfem, it’s most likely homophobia (which, depending on the sex of the bigot, probably stems from the idea of misogyny as a means to conversion [male bigot].)

this is nitpicky, but i feel like it’s important to know what monsters you’re up against. it’s like with pokémon cards— of course if you’re trying to battle someone and you don’t know their active pokémon’s weakness, you’re probably gonna pick the wrong pokémon type to fight them with, which means you have a higher chance of losing. fighting bigotry requires knowing it’s roots and core beliefs. you can’t just ad hominem your way to victory, and you can’t expect to beat bigotry by micro-labeling every presentation of it based on the labels of the person it’s leveraged against. this has been a PSA: FIGHT THE BIG PROBLEM.

[taintassassin]

reblog if you're a sick individual who's attracted to women over 30

[taintassassin]

Kink culture isn’t liberation. It’s the pornified, capitalist, patriarchal repackaging of male violence, sold back as liberation. Whats up with u eroticising ur subjugation and calling him daddy while he chokes you like a victim in a femicide case? Strangulation is the first predictor of domestic homicide, but sure, slap a safe word on it and call it empowerment

sure have your neoliberal “choice” bullshit but consent under patriarchy is coerced by default… conditioned from birth to submit, to please, to accept pain as sexy

its pumped into every aspect of mainstream media, normalizing it so thoroughly and, no, im not about trying to policing your sex life it’s about recognizing that if your pleasure depends on the ritualized humiliation of women, then your pleasure is political, and your politics are shit

idk interrogate ur desires