#you don't often see that!

[homkamiro]

Mosquitos this year sure are persistent, aren't they?

[poorly-drawn-mdzs]

I'm back in the Tigers cage again.

(You too can join in on throwing a Rat Of A Man into a Tiger cage by reading Tiger Tiger)

[godmerlin]

Merlin 2x04 Lancelot and Guinevere

[wisteria-lodge]

That's the thing, isn't it. It's easy to nit-pick clothing history (even in straight-up historical fiction) just because it's a *type* of history that gets overlooked a lot. it also used to be much harder to research.

I'm never going to get on a fantasy book for having fantastical fashion, or for doing the middles-ages-plus-renaissance-in-a-blender thing. One response to my original post was that the smallclothes thing is like insisting all the ladies should be wearing hair-coverings. Veils/headdresses/hairnets, that's a question of fashion, and fashion is fluid and depends on a lot of external factors. Like, black dye was historically expensive, but the strapped-for-cash Nights Watch all wear uniform black. I'll believe the North has some cheap way to make black dye, or they bought all the clothes back when they did have more money, or dressing them all is black is an important traditional thing. Also it's just cool, so.

What bothers me *more* are little moments like - Kvothe saying that he's so poor in The Name of the Wind that he's only got two shirts. Unless you have industrialized clothing production, two is a completely normal and respectable amount of shirts to have. Fabric was expensive! But I also know Patrick Rothfuss is not framing The Name of the Wind as accurate to any kind of history, he's interested in other things. I'm never going to get on someone for not including a detail, or for not putting a narrative focus on something they don't want to write about. But this is how GRRM talks about his books:

I wanted my books to be strongly grounded in history and to show what medieval society was like, and I was also reacting to a lot of fantasy fiction. Most stories depict what I call the ‘Disneyland Middle Ages’—there are princes and princesses and knights in shining armor, but they didn’t want to show what those societies meant and how they functioned.

For the series, he immersed himself in the Middle Ages, reading everything he could about such things as castles, tourneys, knighthood, food, medicine, clothing, and customs. (...) In his opinion, the more you can take in of a period, the more your work will have a sense of truthfulness.

And because of that, I do think people use his work as a model when they shouldn't.

I think that the reason the smallclothes thing bugs me is - okay, we know they didn't wear panties/kickers type underwear, for the entire period he's grabbing from. You certainly didn't have "lacy" knickers, like Jon Snow is talking about up there. The idea that you would put lace on an article of clothing that maybe only one other person is seeing - that's crazy, and framing it as just kind of frivolous and girly... kinda does devalue how hard it is to make lace by hand.

What is so fascinating about panties, to me, is that they are basically disposable clothing. They're supposed to last you for a couple of years, max. You get them in prints, lace, fun colors - because fabric is super easy to make now and it's not like you're not committing to any single garment for that that long. And because fabric is easy/cheap to make, we're more okay with fabric waste. And if you're okay with fabric waste, then that means going to get you really tight tailoring, and when you get that + short hemlines - then modern knickers start to make a lot of sense.

You absolutely had loincloths, wraps, and menstrual belts back in the day (also - side note - what's holding up GRRM's smallclothes? it can't be elastic. Have they got garter belts?) But you're wearing them during exercise/your period, so they're designed to get dirty. They're only supposed to be worn for a short period of time, and are made of plain strips of fabric that are easy to clean. They're basically diapers.

In a pre-industrial society, fabric is just too valuable to be wearing invisibly under your skirt for no reason. Especially not fabric that's been cut and tailored into actual *garments," creating fabric scraps. Like, hit me with a a religious taboo or *something.* Say this is an important modesty thing for the Faith of the Seven, but the Old Gods don't care and this is a cultural difference Sansa has to navigate.

Basically, GRRM made up a term for a type of garment that just did not exist, and drops it into his historically grounded world, and I'm not sure why. So now people latch onto that as historical truth. And I just wish that wasn't the case, because it overlooks and flattens important aspects of the past.

"Smallclothes"

I just reblogged a very interesting thread about historical inaccuracy in A Song of Ice and Fire, but it was doing a whole big picture thing and I didn't want to clog it up with one very small detail that just really specifically bothers me.

It's his use of the term "smallclothes." Basically, in ASOIAF smallclothes = panties/knickers.

Daario found his breeches and pulled them on. He did not trouble himself with smallclothes.

Jon’s anger flared. “No, my lord, I mean to set them to sewing lacy smallclothes."

“... before Lord Snow wets his smallclothes.”

"he looked like he was going to shit his smallclothes"

So okay. 'smallclothes' or 'small-clothes' is a historical term (from the 1700s) that means... underlayer. Here's it being used by Charles Dickens:

“Will you run over, once again, what the boy said?” asks Mr. Tulkinghorn, putting his hands into the pockets of his rusty smallclothes and leaning quietly back in his chair."

The idea being that he's casual/doesn't care and isn't bothering to dress up for his guest. not that he's in his undies. Here is a illustration from Nicholas Nickleby of a suitor who has inappropriately "displayed his small-clothes"

I've heard "smallclothes" refer to things like pocket-handkerchiefs, and anecdotally it's sometimes used to refer to knickers in linguistically stubborn places like Yorkshire, but that just is not how the word was used historically.

so okay. fine. It's a fantasy story, he's just made up his own word that means "panties."

Except NO. They straight up did not wear panties in the middle ages and renaissance. Sometimes you got loose under-breeches with a split crotch BUT - in general that long white shirt/chemise just WAS your undergarment. Think of how much easier it is to manufacture! And clean! Boxer brief type things weren't a thing until the 1900s, and modern-ish woman's panties ("step-ins") weren't a thing until the 20s, because the hemlines stopped working with pantalettes and bloomers. There are no "lacy smallclothes" like there is lacy lingerie. That only makes sense if you have industrialized clothing manufacturing!

Honestly I would have thought GRRM would be all over this, like it's kinda sexy that it's just thigh-high stocking or leggings underneath those big dresses, right? But he hasn't done that. Instead he's just ported in a modern article of clothing and gave it an old-timey name. Just a little hint that he hasn't actually properly got his head around how these clothes were made and used, and that devalues them.

And it's escaped containment! It's canon in Dragon Age, and in fanfiction I'm seeing "smallclothes" or "smalls" used to describe the underwear in in Our Flag Means Death, the Lord of the Rings, the Witcher. Just have nothing! None of these people should be wearing panties!!!!

[keferon]

The tac net crash chapter is one of my favorites so far~

Ah and. Guess what. I just discovered that including this post, I made 50 pieces of fanart for Mistakes on mistakes until.. I’m so sane and normal about this story can you tell👍

[curiphynn]

Anakin can get a thank you kiss for the end of 2024, as a treat! 😌

[fuzzypuppybuddie]

Made this when I was sick

[nonipunssif]

I can see this happening 🕴️

No text version + base:

[liedownquisition]

When They Match Each Other's Freak

[teddybeartoji]

tw mickey in a dress🙈🙈

sorry they're kinda blurry but you get the point okay the dress was very sex and i looked very prettyy:33333

[poorly-drawn-mdzs]

Ghouls night out

[First] Prev <–-> Next

[honehonn3honey]

All drawings about Kirishima from 2019 to 2024

1 2 3 4 5 6

[zzoupz]

my three girlfriends. and yes, they smoke weed

challenge link

[zaacoy]

Short freenoodles focused comic inspired in part by takakmimi's freenoodles post on twt!!

[bread-wizards]

I actually think Dorian and Orym should fight more.

Remember when their slowly building tension over and entire episode (full of passive aggressive remarks and blame throwing) led to threats? And how after, Orym thanked Dorian for handing over the crown sadly because he knew Dorian would be mad at him? And Dorian couldn't even look at him because he was legitimately hurt, thinking Orym was disappointed in him for doing what he thought was right? That was peak.

The fact they went from that to their current closeness and trust is the best part of their entire dynamic. Their relationship was hard fought and still will be. They will fight for it because they respect and care for one another deeply, and their disagreements don't change that, only improve it.

[cosmicredcadet]

A character looks straight into the camera and says "I'm not interested in romance" and people will still say "No, it's not confirmed they're aromantic!!!" "They could change their mind!!!" "it's a challenge for them to overcome!!!" "They'll have character development that makes them fall in love"

It's like they are given the most blatant answer to a character romantic orientation and they actively ignore it. all the while all it takes is subtext for people to speak as if it is fact for a character to be any other sexuality.