#vote:

[nevinslibrary]

Comic Book Saturday

Loki is one of my favorite Marvel characters, especially one of the Norse characters (I even like him way more than Thor, shh, don’t tell, although I like him less than Sif or Freya). So, when I found this awesome book where Loki is running for the President of the United States. Yep, I knew I had to read it.

I mean, plot wise it is what it says on the tin. Loki is running for President. So, the question then becomes, is this for real. Does he want to win, or is there something else that’s going on?

This was such a fun read. Between Loki himself, the heroes (oh the heroes, heh….), and then, there’s Latveria… I would also say that even if you haven’t been keeping up on Marvel (*cough* oops, like I haven’t *cough*) this is still a really fun read!

You may like this book If you Liked: Journey into Mystery by Kieron Gillen, Loki by Daniel Kibblesmith, or Thor Epic Collection by Stan Lee

Vote Loki by Langdon Foss

[thellawtoknow]

The Stages of the Legislative Process

The Stages of the Legislative Process1. Draftinga. Identification of the Problem b. Collaboration Among Stakeholders c. Legal and Constitutional Alignment d. Language and Structure e. Preliminary Approval 2. Introductiona. Role of the Sponsor b. Chamber and Jurisdiction c. Assignment and Identification d. Legislative Agenda 3. Committee Reviewa. Referral to Relevant Committees b. Examination and Analysis c. Hearings and Testimonies d. Amendments and Recommendations e. Reporting the Bill 4. Debate and Amendmenta. Structure of Debate b. Addressing Constituency Concerns c. Proposal and Adoption of Amendments d. Transparency and Accountability e. Resolution of Differences 5. Votinga. Types of Votes b. Majority Requirements c. Outcomes of Voting d. Bicameral Considerations 6. Enactmenta. Submission to the Executive b. Executive Actions c. Publication and Promulgation d. Implementation and Enforcement e. Judicial Oversight Conclusion

The Stages of the Legislative Process

The legislative process is a fundamental component of governance, transforming societal needs into enforceable laws. Its stages ensure that legislation is thoroughly considered, debated, and refined to serve the interests of the populace. Although variations exist between political systems, most legislative processes can be divided into six key stages: drafting, introduction, committee review, debate and amendment, voting, and enactment.

1. Drafting Drafting is the foundational stage of the legislative process, where an idea begins its transformation into a formal legislative proposal. The process typically starts with the recognition of a societal issue or a gap in existing laws that necessitates government intervention. This stage involves multiple participants and several critical steps: a. Identification of the Problem Issues prompting the drafting of a bill can arise from diverse sources, such as public demand, research findings, judicial rulings, or emerging social, economic, or environmental challenges. Policymakers, advocacy groups, and legal experts may highlight the need for legislative action. b. Collaboration Among Stakeholders Drafting often involves collaboration among legislators, legal drafters, subject-matter experts, and representatives of affected communities. This multi-disciplinary approach ensures that the bill is informed by a wide range of perspectives and addresses the issue comprehensively. Interest groups and lobbyists may also play a role, advocating for specific provisions to be included or excluded. c. Legal and Constitutional Alignment The proposed bill must adhere to the constitution, the supreme law governing the jurisdiction. Drafters must ensure that the bill does not conflict with existing laws unless explicitly intended to repeal or amend them. This requires thorough legal analysis and consultation with constitutional experts. d. Language and Structure The language of the bill must be precise, clear, and free of ambiguity. Ambiguity in legal texts can lead to misinterpretation and challenges during implementation. Drafting also includes defining key terms, structuring provisions logically, and addressing potential scenarios that may arise once the law is enacted. e. Preliminary Approval Before formal introduction, the draft may undergo review by government bodies or party leadership to ensure it aligns with broader policy objectives. Feedback from this review may lead to revisions, fine-tuning the bill’s content. 2. Introduction Once the bill is finalized, it proceeds to the introduction stage, where it formally enters the legislative process. This stage serves as the official launch of the bill into public and legislative discourse. a. Role of the Sponsor The sponsor of the bill, usually a member of the legislative body, presents the proposal. Sponsors may be individual legislators, groups of legislators, or government ministers in jurisdictions where the executive plays a direct role in legislation. The sponsor typically advocates for the bill throughout the legislative process, addressing concerns and championing its purpose. b. Chamber and Jurisdiction In bicameral legislatures, the bill may be introduced in either the lower or upper chamber, depending on its nature and the rules governing the legislative body. For instance, budget-related bills might originate in the lower chamber. In unicameral systems, the bill is introduced directly into the single legislative house. c. Assignment and Identification The bill is assigned a unique identifier, such as a number or title, to track its progress. It may also be accompanied by an explanatory note or statement of intent, clarifying the purpose and objectives of the proposed legislation. d. Legislative Agenda After introduction, the bill becomes part of the legislative agenda. It is scheduled for further consideration, and its text is made available to legislators and the public, ensuring transparency and encouraging informed debate. 3. Committee Review The committee review stage is where the substance of the bill undergoes rigorous scrutiny. Committees are essential to the legislative process because they provide expertise, facilitate stakeholder engagement, and ensure that only well-considered proposals advance. a. Referral to Relevant Committees Once introduced, the bill is referred to a committee with jurisdiction over its subject matter. For example, a health-related bill might be sent to the Health or Public Welfare Committee. If the bill has multiple implications, it may be reviewed by several committees. b. Examination and Analysis Committee members analyze the bill’s provisions in detail, examining its legal, social, and financial implications. This may include reviewing background research, assessing compliance with constitutional and statutory norms, and evaluating the bill's potential impact. c. Hearings and Testimonies Committees often conduct public hearings to gather input from stakeholders, including experts, interest groups, affected individuals, and government agencies. These hearings provide valuable insights and help ensure that the bill is grounded in real-world considerations. d. Amendments and Recommendations Based on their findings, committees may propose amendments to improve the bill’s clarity, scope, or practicality. They may also consolidate similar proposals to avoid duplication or inconsistency. In some cases, committees might recommend that the bill be rejected if it is deemed unnecessary, impractical, or flawed. e. Reporting the Bill After completing their review, committees prepare a report outlining their recommendations. This report may include the amended text of the bill, a summary of the committee’s findings, and suggestions for further legislative action. The bill then proceeds to the next stage, typically a full debate in the legislative chamber. These three stages—drafting, introduction, and committee review—are essential to the legislative process. They ensure that proposed laws are thoughtfully developed, transparently introduced, and thoroughly evaluated before being debated and voted on by the full legislative body. 4. Debate and Amendment The debate and amendment stage is one of the most dynamic phases of the legislative process, as it brings the bill to the legislative chamber for public scrutiny and collective decision-making. This stage not only allows lawmakers to engage in detailed discussions but also offers opportunities to refine the bill further through amendments. a. Structure of Debate Once a bill reaches the floor of the legislative chamber, it is scheduled for debate. The structure of this debate is often governed by parliamentary rules, which dictate the time allocated for discussion, the order of speakers, and the procedures for proposing changes. - Opening Statements: The sponsor or a designated representative typically introduces the bill, presenting its objectives and justifications. - Floor Participation: Legislators take turns expressing their views, often reflecting the perspectives of their constituencies or political ideologies. Proponents highlight the bill’s benefits, while opponents may criticize its flaws, unintended consequences, or alignment with broader policies. b. Addressing Constituency Concerns Legislators use this stage to articulate the concerns and interests of their constituents. This ensures that the lawmaking process remains democratic and participatory, allowing diverse voices to influence the legislation. c. Proposal and Adoption of Amendments Amendments are integral to this stage, enabling legislators to modify the bill to address concerns or improve its provisions. - Types of Amendments: These may include technical corrections, substantive changes, or additions to clarify ambiguities or expand the bill’s scope. - Procedures for Amendments: Legislators must formally propose amendments, which are then debated and voted upon individually. Some amendments may be accepted by consensus, while others face significant contention. - Strategic Use of Amendments: At times, amendments are used strategically to strengthen or weaken the bill, reflecting the ideological, political, or regional priorities of lawmakers. d. Transparency and Accountability Debates in the legislative chamber are typically public, allowing citizens, media, and advocacy groups to follow the proceedings. This transparency enhances accountability and ensures that legislators’ actions are subject to public scrutiny. e. Resolution of Differences In bicameral systems, if the bill is amended in one chamber, the other chamber may need to review and approve the changes. This back-and-forth negotiation ensures that both chambers agree on the final text of the bill before it moves to a vote. 5. Voting The voting stage is the culmination of the legislative process within the chamber. It reflects the collective decision of lawmakers on whether the bill should proceed to the next stage. a. Types of Votes The method of voting varies depending on the legislative system and the significance of the bill: - Voice Vote: Legislators verbally indicate their approval or disapproval. - Roll-Call Vote: Each legislator’s vote is recorded, ensuring transparency and accountability. - Electronic Voting: In modern legislatures, electronic systems are used for efficiency and accuracy. b. Majority Requirements Different types of bills may require different levels of support to pass: - Simple Majority: Most bills require more votes in favor than against. - Supermajority: Constitutional amendments or critical legislation may require a two-thirds or three-fourths majority. - Unanimous Consent: In rare cases, a bill may require full agreement from all present members. c. Outcomes of Voting - Approval: If the bill secures the necessary votes, it proceeds to the next stage. - Rejection: If the bill fails to gain approval, it may be discarded, significantly revised, or reintroduced in a future session. - Conditional Approval: In some systems, the bill may pass subject to further changes or reviews. d. Bicameral Considerations In bicameral legislatures, both chambers must approve the bill, often requiring identical versions. If discrepancies arise, a conference committee may be formed to reconcile differences, after which both chambers vote again. 6. Enactment The enactment stage transitions the bill from a legislative proposal to enforceable law, involving the executive branch’s approval and preparations for implementation. a. Submission to the Executive Once a bill is approved by the legislative body, it is sent to the head of state or government for consideration. This step may vary across political systems: - Presidential Systems: The bill is presented to the president or a similar authority. - Parliamentary Systems: The bill may require assent from a ceremonial head of state, such as a monarch, with real power residing in the executive cabinet. b. Executive Actions The executive has several options when reviewing a bill: - Approval/Assent: The executive signs the bill, formally enacting it into law. - Veto: The executive may reject the bill, either outright or with suggestions for revision. In many systems, the legislature can override the veto with a supermajority vote. - Pocket Veto: In some systems, the executive may effectively veto a bill by taking no action within a specified period. c. Publication and Promulgation Once approved, the bill is published in the official government gazette or similar medium, informing the public of its enactment. Promulgation marks the official start of the law’s effect. Some laws take effect immediately, while others specify a future date or require additional regulations for implementation. d. Implementation and Enforcement The responsibility for implementing the law falls to administrative agencies and government departments. This involves: - Drafting and issuing regulations or guidelines to operationalize the law. - Training officials and staff tasked with enforcement. - Allocating resources and setting up mechanisms for compliance and monitoring. e. Judicial Oversight Courts play a critical role in interpreting and reviewing the new law to ensure it adheres to constitutional principles. If challenged, courts may strike down provisions deemed unconstitutional or provide authoritative interpretations for ambiguous sections. These stages—debate and amendment, voting, and enactment—are crucial to ensuring that laws are robust, democratically legitimate, and ready for practical implementation. They encapsulate the deliberative and procedural rigor inherent in the legislative process. Conclusion The legislative process exemplifies the principles of deliberation, representation, and accountability in governance. By passing through multiple stages, each bill is subjected to scrutiny, ensuring that it meets societal needs and adheres to legal standards. Despite the challenges of political negotiation and procedural complexity, the legislative process remains a cornerstone of democracy, reflecting the collective effort to create just and effective laws. Read the full article

[389]

PORTO ROCHA

[nanaluvbug]

🧀🥪🌶️🥭 The Ravening War portraits  🧀🥪🌶️🥭

patreon * twitch * shop  

[ID: a series of digitally illustrated portraits showing - top left to bottom right - Bishop Raphaniel Charlock (an old radish man with a big red head and large white eyebrows & a scraggly beard. he wears green and gold robes with symbols of the bulb and he smirks at the viewer) Karna Solara (a skinny young chili pepper woman with wavy green hair, freckled light green skin with red blooms on her cheeks. she wears a chili pepper hood lined with small pepper seeds and stares cagily ahead) Thane Delissandro Katzon (a muscular young beef man with bright pinkish skin with small skin variations to resemble pastrami and dark burgundy hair. he wears a bread headress with a swirl of rye covering his ears and he looks ahead, optimistic and determined) Queen Amangeaux Epicée du Peche (a bright mango woman with orange skin, big red hair adorned with a green laurel, and sparkling green/gold makeup. she wears large gold hoop earrings and a high leafy collar) and Colin Provolone (a scraggly cheese man with waxy yellow skin and dark slicked back hair and patchy dark facial hair. he wears a muted, ratty blue bandana around his neck and raises a scarred brow at the viewer with a smirk) End ID.)

[bartleby-company]

(vía Another America 50 by Phillip Toledano)

[70sscifiart]

One of my favorites by Paul Lehr, used as a 1971 cover to "Earth Abides," by George R. Stewart. It's also in my upcoming art book!

[taizooo]

もともとは10年ほど前にTumblrにすごくハマっていて。いろんな人をフォローしたらかっこいい写真や色が洪水のように出てきて、もう自分で絵を描かなくて良いじゃん、ってなったんです。それで何年も画像を集めていって、そこで集まった色のイメージやモチーフ、レンズの距離感など画面構成を抽象化して、いまの感覚にアウトプットしています。画像の持つ情報量というものが作品の影響になっていますね。

映画『きみの色』山田尚子監督×はくいきしろい対談。嫉妬し合うふたりが語る、色と光の表現｜Tokyo Art Beat

[layla-keating]

#thistension

XO, KITTY — 1.09 “SNAFU”

[nevver]

No one wants to be here and no one wants to leave, Dave Smith (because)

[389]

PORTO ROCHA

[theroyalweekly]

Beautiful photo of the Princess of Wales departing Westminster Abbey after attending the Commonwealth Day Service. --

[mellowlike]

齋藤飛鳥

[goodvibesandmemes]

GENERAL MEMES: Vampire/Immortal Themed 🩸🦇🌹

↳ Please feel free to tweak them.

Themes: violence, death, blood, murder, depression/negative thoughts

SYMBOLS: ↳ Use “↪”to reverse the characters where applicable!

🦇 - To catch my muse transforming into a bat 🌞 - To warn my muse about/see my muse in the sunlight. 🩸 - To witness my muse drinking blood from a bag. 🐇 - To witness To catch my muse drinking blood from an animal. 🧔🏽 - To witness To catch my muse drinking blood from a human. 🦌 - For our muses hunt together for the first time. 🏃🏿‍♀️ - To see my muse using super speed. 🏋🏼‍♂️ - To see my muse using their super strength. 🧛🏻‍♂️ - To confront my muse about being a vampire. 🌕 - For my muse to lament missing the sun. ⏰ - For my muse to tell yours about a story from their long, immortal life. 🤛🏽 - To offer my muse your wrist to drink from. 👩🏿 - For my muse to reminisce about a long lost love. 👩🏽‍🤝‍👩🏽 - For your muse to look exactly like my muse's lost love. 👄 - For my muse to bite yours. 👀 - For my muse to glamour/compel yours. 🧄 - To try and sneakily feed my muse garlic to test if they're a vampire. 🔗 - To try and apprehend my muse with silver chains. 🔪 - To try and attack my muse with a wooden stake. 👤 - To notice that my muse doesn't have a reflection. 🌹 - For my muse to turn yours into a vampire. 🌚 - For my muse and yours to spend time together during the night. 🧛🏼‍♀️ - For my muse to tell yours about their maker/sire.

SENTENCES:

"I've been alive for a long time [ name ], I can handle myself." "I'm over a thousand years old, you can't stop me!" "Lots of windows in this place, not exactly the greatest place for a vampire." "Do you really drink human blood? Don't you feel guilty?" "Vampires are predators, [ name ] hunting is just part of our nature, you can't change that." "You just killed that person! You're a monster!" "Tomorrow at dawn, you'll meet the sun [ name ]." "Can you make me like you?" "Do you really want to live forever?" "You say you want to live forever, [ name ], but forever is a long time, longer than you can imagine." "What was it like to live through [ historic event / time period ]?" "Did people really dress like that when you were young?" "What were you like when you were human?" "We’re vampires, [ name ], we have no soul to save, and I don’t care." "How many people have you killed? You can tell me, I can handle it." "Did you meet [ historic figure ]?" "Everyone dies in the end, what does it matter if I... speed it along." "Every time we feed that person is someone's mother, brother, sister, husband. You better start getting used to that if you want to survive this life." "[ she is / he is / they are ] the strongest vampire anyone has heard of, no one knows how to stop them, and if you try you're going to get yourselves killed." "Vampire hunters are everywhere in this city, you need to watch your back." "Humans will never understand the bond a vampire has with [ his / her / their ] maker, it's a bond like no other." "Here, have this ring, it will protect you from the sunlight." "I get you're an immortal creature of the night and all that, but do you have to be such a downer about it?" "In my [ centuries / decades / millennia ] of living, do you really think no one has tried to kill me before?" "Vampires aren't weakened by garlic, that's a myth." "I used to be a lot worse than I was now, [ name ], I've had time to mellow, to become used to what I am. I'm ashamed of the monster I was." "The worst part of living forever is watching everyone you love die, while you stay frozen, still, constant." "I've lived so long I don't feel anything any more." "Are there more people like you? How many?" "Life has never been fair, [ name ], why would start being fair now you're immortal?" "You want to be young forever? Knock yourself out, I just hope you understand what you're giving up." "You never told me who turned you into a vampire. Who were they? Why did they do it?" "I could spend an eternity with you and never get bored." "Do you really sleep in coffins?" "There are worse things for a vampire than death, of that I can assure you [ name ]." "You need to feed, it's been days. You can drink from me, I can tell you're hungry." "The process of becoming a vampire is risky, [ name ], you could die, and I don't know if I could forgive myself for killing you." "I'm a vampire, I can hold a grudge for a long time, so believe me when I say I will never forgive this. Never." "You were human once! How can you have no empathy?" "You don't have to kill to be a vampire, but what would be the fun in that." "You can spend your first years of immortality doing whatever you want to whoever you want, but when you come back to your senses, it'll hit you harder than anything you've felt before." "One day, [ name ], everything you've done is going to catch up to you, and you're never going to forgive yourself." "Stop kidding yourself, [ name ], you're a vampire, a killer, a predator. You might as well embrace it now because you can't keep this up forever." "You can't [ compel / glamour ] me, I have something to protect me." "When you've lived as long as me, there's not much more in life you can do." "You want me to turn you? You don't know what you're asking me to do." "You really have to stop hissing like that, it's getting on my nerves." "I'm going to drive this stake through your heart, [ name ], and I'm going to enjoy it."

[shitakeo33]

よく「発明は1人でできる。製品化には10人かかる。量産化には100人かかる」とも言われますが、実際に、私はネオジム磁石を1人で発明しました。製品化、量産化については住友特殊金属の仲間たちと一緒に、短期間のうちに成功させました。82年に発明し、83年から生産が始まったのですから、非常に早いです。そしてネオジム磁石は、ハードディスクのＶＣＭ(ボ���スコイルモーター)の部品などの電子機器を主な用途として大歓迎を受け、生産量も年々倍増して、2000年には世界で1万トンを超えました。

世界最強「ネオジム磁石はこうして見つけた」（佐川眞人 氏 ／ インターメタリックス株式会社 代表取締役社長） | Science Portal - 科学技術の最新情報サイト「サイエンスポータル」

[whencyclopedia]

The Delian League, Part 2: From Eurymedon to the Thirty Years Peace (465/4-445/4 BCE)

This text is part of an article series on the Delian League.

The second phase of the Delian League's operations begins with the Hellenic victory over Mede forces at Eurymedon and ends with the Thirty Years Peace between Athens and Sparta (roughly 465/4 – 445/4 BCE).The Greek triumph at Eurymedon resulted in a cessation of hostilities against the Persians, which lasted almost six years. Whether or not this peace or truce followed from some formal treaty negotiated by Cimon, son of Miltiades, remains unknown.

Nevertheless, the Greek success at Eurymedon proved so decisive, the damage inflicted on Persia so great, and the wealth confiscated so considerable that an increasing number of League members soon began to wonder if the alliance still remained necessary. The Persians, however, had not altogether withdrawn from the Aegean. They still had, for example, a sizeable presence in both Cyprus and Doriscus. They also set about to build a great number of new triremes.

REDUCTION OF THASOS & THE BATTLE OF DRABESCUS

A quarrel soon erupted between the Athenians and Thasians over several trading ports and a wealth-producing mine (465 BCE). Competing economic interests compelled the rich and powerful Thasos to revolt from the Delian League. The Thasians resisted for almost three years. When the polis finally capitulated, the Athenians forced Thasos to surrender its naval fleet and the mine, dismantle defensive walls, pay retributions, and converted the future League contributions to monetary payments: 30 talents annum. Some League members became disaffected with the Athenian reduction of Thasos. Several poleis observed the Athenians had now developed a penchant for using "compulsion." They started to see Athens acting with both "arrogance and violence." On expeditions, furthermore, the other members felt they "no longer served as equals" (Thuc. 1.99.2).

The Athenians, meanwhile, attempted to establish a colony on the Strymon river to secure timber from Macedon, which shared its borders with the west bank. The location also proved a critical strategic point from which to protect the Hellespont. The Thracians, however, repelled the League forces at Drabescus. The Athenians soon realized the threats from both Thrace and Macedon made permanent settlements in the region difficult as they were essentially continental powers, and the League fleet could not reach them easily. Designs for the region, however, would not change, and the Athenians would return there again.

The Delian League had by this time demonstrated an inherent conflict from its beginnings: on the one hand, it engaged in heroic struggles against the Mede and extended its influence, reaping enormous benefits (especially for its poorer members). On the other hand, it also suppressed its members and soon demanded obedience from them.

The League engaged from the outset in a form of soft imperialism, collecting and commanding voluntary naval contributions and tribute while Athens used those resources and led all expeditions, enforcing continued membership but also showing little or no interest to interfere with the internal mechanisms of any member polis (unless it openly rebelled).

Continue reading...