#unit viability speculation | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

crystalelemental · 4 days ago

Text

Unit Viability Speculation (January 2025)

I'm not even going to front, I'm bored of the teambuilding writeups, and this month is super boring, this is all I'm doing this month.

Damage Challenge Hop Electric. Absolutely comedic. Well, I can't say he's not trying. Thunder Wave and Zing Zap are solid disruptive tools, if nothing else. He's pretty standard fare, I can't say I see anything too exciting in him. Better BP Surge, if we want to get hostile about it.

Mix Lucas I don't really respect it. I feel like he's solidly fine, but lacking in particular niches. He debuffs offenses and sets Ground Zone, only has Extension 3 on that Zone, and is otherwise...fine? I dunno, I'm unimpressed, I think. I have Arc Cynthia, what is he supposed to offer me, exactly?

New Years Poppy Legitimate contender for taking over Anni Lillie 24's role. Solgalillie has the Sprint effect, but Poppy's another round of Support boosting, an extra application of Steel Zone, extension, offense and speed debuffing coupled with boosting team speed, a 60% AoE flinch. Poppy feels very much like a direct upgrade to Solgalillie...if it wasn't for Arc Steven. See, part of what makes Solgalillie tick so well in that composition is the cooldown. Sprint and a -2 on her TM allows for two fast-ramps in the match. That team succeeds in part off of how well it cycles explosive sync damage. Poppy's got better staying power than Lillie because of the triple set extensions, but consider that Arc Steven/SS Lear/Solgalillie have beaten nearly every Ultimate Battle already. Poppy is unnecessary if that trio is set, and if you're missing Lear like I am, Poppy is not an effective replacement. She has some nice traits, but she's far from Lear's level of supportive utility. She's a purchasable upgrade to the weakest link that was already pulling its weight. I actually am impressed with her kit, I just think she's not really doing enough to stand out in the current power structure of the type. Also is anyone else weirded out that it's Poppy getting first alt? Not Rika? Geeta? Larry? It's Poppy? I'm not complaining but this is strange.

New Years Raihan Another Ground man with little going on. I'm not impressed. Sandstorm as an individual effect is pretty atrocious, and he has no extension effect. His other effects are kind of whatever. He can spam an AoE paralysis, which is okay for Damage challenge, but it has a debuff effect that kinda offsets the speed. I don't really respect it at all.

Blossom <3 Best Furisode girl is finally here, and she brought Kirlia. I love it. She is, unfortunately, kinda mid. Mind Games Charm is something, but it's single-target. Hypnosis is something, but without a rare accuracy support boost, she has to pop TM which sets Gradual Healing, ruining the fast-paced action for Damage Challenge. She's got some potential as a free pair, but she's just south of good. Like all of Valerie's entourage. Go figure. Oh, and before you get any ideas: her sync only has a 50% bonus, and I'm pretty sure they don't get EX. She's solely for utility and it's not even that great.

Atticus My man! Should have been Poison Zone support. Damage Field, are we serious? He doesn't even get consistent Poison effect, it's only two use! Absolute tragedy is occurring over here for best Star member. I can't really find anything to specifically praise in his kit either. It's a little sad, but he feel kinda fine and nothing else. Such is the curse of the Poison typing.

Mela This is a weird kit. The kind of weird I like, admittedly, but it's still weird. Her function is aiming for -6 Def/Sp Def, to set off her Buddy move, which inverts those debuffs to buffs, and powers itself up when Def is lowered, then also hits -3 sync cooldown on use. Her only means of lowering those stats is through Armor Cannon, and a 4/5 grid node that lowers both defenses by 4. Because no other option in your team would ever lower your own defenses, Mela is entirely on her own for this endeavor, and if you do not have this 4/5 grid node, which requires her to be at 4/5, she's essentially unworkable. As a Fire type. That is. Embarrassing.

Sygna Suit Giovanni, Bitch Mode Routinely, Giovanni will introduce himself with a new alt, and Reddit will lose its shit over how cool he looks and how strong his kit is, only for me to go "the outfit isn't that interesting" and eventually learn that he sucks mondo ass. I'm not even going to entertain the notion there's anything to respect here. Giovanni is a weak bitch of a man with nothing going on ever in his life, and Guzzlord is no different.

Points for the kit, I think this is sufficiently fun as an idea. Stockpile into Buddy Move swallow that heals the team, or Spit Up that deals damage. It's a neat idea! His kit is also fairly well optimized around it, giving it team-wide boosting for defensive stats, and giving a 3x boost rate across the board from the look of it. This means he gets two Stockpiles into his offensive buddy move that needs +6, in order to...lower the foe's Def and Sp Def by one (1) stat rank. Oooooh...

See, this is Giovanni's problem. People are talking about NC Calem like he's dead in the water over this, and...that's only kinda true. He sets Dark Zone on entry, and on his sync, if and only if he takes the Field role. Oh, and the entry Zone? 4/5 grid node, because Master Fairs have those now. This man needs fucking 4/5 to match NC Calem, and has far worse timing with it, without any extension effect. His sole utility over NC Calem is that he gives Sync Up Next and is better at healing sustain. The latter is useful, the former borderline worthless depending on your composition. Akari and NC Marnie compositions don't have a lot of use for this, because they're so heavily focused on move damage over sync. It's nice for Giacomo given his demands, but again, for move damage. His sync isn't worth talking about until 5/5, and by then Giacomo handles himself. What's the dark meta comp that was so desperate for Sync Moves Up Next? It's also worth noting that SC Zinnia, the one option that really might like the sync improvement given her job, likes Calem because Calem perfectly caps her out turn 1. Giovanni can't do that and takes multiple turns to get her to +4 she needs. So I can't even say he's better there either. No respect for this failure of a man.

Lodge Lana When is it Caitlin's turn? She's not very good. Confuse and Burn effects off high-gauge moves as a support, defensive oriented boosting and Mini Potion All, nothing really exceptional even among free pairs.

Final Thoughts Skippable month. It's rare they drop a whole-ass Master Fair that I can earnestly say I have no interest in, but damn if they didn't pull it off. Good job, team. My only mild interest is Poppy. The new Steelix doesn't look too bad, but I admit, I'm mostly incensed by the possibility of an answer to Masked Royal. I hate that Ultimate Battle so much. Beyond that, even Poppy's not too interesting. I'm kinda mad Solgalillie is threatening to be replaced already. When will Lillie get anything truly good and persistently useful?

#pokemon masters #unit viability speculation

2 notes · View notes

globalblockchainshow · 28 days ago

Text

Why NFTs Struggled Despite the Hype Around Ordinals

Understanding NFTs and Ordinals

NFTs, once a buzzword in the digital world, have seen a steep decline in interest. These unique digital assets differ from cryptocurrencies as they are not interchangeable. Built on blockchain protocols like ERC-721 (later upgraded to ERC-1155), NFTs are secured with a unique code only accessible upon purchase, making them distinct and difficult to trade directly with other NFTs.

Each blockchain uses its own NFT protocols. For instance, Ethereum’s NFTs operate on its token standards, while Bitcoin’s ordinals follow a “serial number” system. Ordinals represent a distinct evolution in NFTs, storing data entirely on-chain and leveraging Bitcoin's infrastructure to introduce a unique type of digital asset.

The Initial Hype and Expectations Around Ordinals

Bitcoin ordinals gained attention due to their innovative on-chain data storage, ensuring immutability. Unlike traditional NFTs, whose rarity is based on limited supply or unique traits, ordinals introduced a scarcity model tied to Satoshi units, offering potential scalability advantages. This novel approach sparked optimism, suggesting a new wave of possibilities for NFT technology.

Challenges Facing NFTs

Despite the initial enthusiasm, several factors contributed to the challenges NFTs faced:

1. Overvaluation and Speculation NFTs have been plagued by speculative investments and unpredictable price swings. Overinflated prices based on hype rather than intrinsic value created an unstable market, making it difficult for genuine use cases to thrive.

2. Lack of Intrinsic Value Many NFTs lack tangible value, which has raised concerns over their long-term viability. Issues like legal uncertainties, security risks, and the potential loss of digital assets after unforeseen events have further dampened trust in NFTs.

3. Scalability and Environmental Concerns Traditional blockchain models, particularly those using Proof-of-Work, consume significant energy, leading to environmental concerns and scalability limitations. While the transition to Proof-of-Stake has alleviated some of these issues, sustainability remains a key challenge for widespread NFT adoption.

4. Regulatory Uncertainty The absence of clear regulations has left the NFT market vulnerable to cybercrimes and artificial trading volume manipulation. Until robust regulatory frameworks are in place, concerns about fraud and market instability will persist.

The Ordinals Effect

Ordinals played a critical role in reigniting interest in NFTs. In 2023, they contributed to a 91.9% growth in NFT trading volumes by introducing a novel scarcity model and generating renewed market enthusiasm. Techniques like wash trading, driven by Ordinals, created an illusion of high market activity, further attracting investors.

By leveraging Ordinals, platforms like Binance introduced additional utility to NFTs, enhancing their intrinsic value and broadening their appeal. For Bitcoin, this innovation increased transaction fees, providing a new revenue stream for participants. These developments highlight the significant impact Ordinals have had on reshaping perceptions of NFTs.

The Future of NFTs

Beyond art and collectibles, NFTs are expanding into industries like gaming, real estate, and ticketing. For example, blockchain-based event management uses NFTs to ensure transparency and fairness in ticketing.

As NFTs evolve, they are addressing real-world challenges, drawing investments, and finding applications across various sectors. However, ethical considerations, transparency, and sustainability must remain a priority to ensure the market's integrity.

Conclusion

NFTs are digital assets secured by unique blockchain codes, making duplication nearly impossible. Despite challenges like volatility and speculation, innovations like Ordinals have strengthened the technology’s utility and adoption in diverse applications.

To truly capitalize on the potential of NFTs, investors and creators must focus on their intrinsic value rather than market hype. For those eager to explore the NFT landscape further, events like the Global Blockchain Show offer invaluable insights, connecting attendees with experts and showcasing emerging trends in NFTs and blockchain technology. Don’t miss your chance to be part of the future—get your ticket today!

#globalblockchainshow #crypto conference dubai #blockchain conference #crypto conference #blockchain summit

0 notes

stevishabitat · 1 month ago

Text

Trump’s transition team caught off guard by Hegseth allegation | CNN Politics

CNN — President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team was in the middle of announcing new Cabinet picks this week when they were informed of a sexual assault allegation about one of his previous selections, Pete Hegseth, stunning several members of Trump’s team who have since raised questions about the viability of his nomination, according to two people close to the situation.

Trump had announced he was tapping Hegseth as his next secretary of defense after only days of considering the veteran-turned-Fox News host and very little internal vetting. Within 48 hours, the heads of Trump’s transition team were brought a complaint about a sexual assault allegation regarding Hegseth.

The campaign was brought information that aligns with what Monterey, California, police described as an investigation into “an alleged sexual assault” involving Hegseth on October 8, 2017.

Hegseth was a speaker at a conference held by the California Federation of Republican Women at a hotel during the timeframe when the alleged assault took place, according to photos of the event posted on Facebook. Hegseth has not been charged in any criminal case or named as a defendant in any civil lawsuit filed in Monterey County since 2017, and his attorney denied any wrongdoing.

But the nature of the allegations caused incoming chief of staff Susie Wiles to question Hegseth during a call Thursday, a source told CNN. Wiles asked Hegseth if there were any other issues the team should be aware of moving forward.

Hegseth wasn’t ever vetted by an outside firm before he was announced. Some people who previously worked for Trump when he was last in office and briefly considered Hegseth to run the Department of Veterans Affairs noted it was short-lived for similar reasons, without citing specifics.

One source insisted that despite the surprise, the president-elect and the transition team were moving forward with the nomination at this time.

But in the days since, the allegation has only roiled Hegseth’s already shaky selection to run the largest agency in the federal government that includes millions of service members and civilians and a budget over $800 billion. There was open speculation on Friday in Trump’s orbit about whether Hegseth would ultimately pull his own nomination, with several people concerned that there could be more damaging information to come.

The president-elect’s pick this week of Hegseth, a nominee without senior military or public office experience, to serve as his secretary of defense had surprised both Pentagon officials and the former president’s own allies.

But Trump’s communications director defended Hegseth in an earlier statement to CNN, saying he “has vigorously denied any and all accusations, and no charges were filed.”

“We look forward to his confirmation as United States Secretary of Defense so he can get started on Day One to Make America Safe and Great Again,” Steven Cheung said.

1 note · View note

unpluggedfinancial · 2 months ago

Text

Could the U.S. Adopting a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Change Everything?

Donald Trump, during his campaign, proposed a bold vision: creating a strategic Bitcoin asset reserve for the United States. It's a concept that has sparked considerable discussion, both within and outside the crypto community. What could it mean for the broader crypto ecosystem if the U.S. takes such a monumental step towards embracing Bitcoin? Let’s dive into the potential impact.

Trump’s proposal to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve essentially positions Bitcoin as a new kind of financial asset in America’s broader strategy—a digital counterpart to gold or oil. The government would stockpile Bitcoin, integrating it as part of national reserves. This approach could be a seismic shift in the way nations think about their financial foundation. For the broader crypto community, this move would mean more than just another country holding Bitcoin; it would signal a deep integration of Bitcoin into one of the world's largest economies, providing a level of legitimacy that crypto advocates have long hoped for.

First, let’s talk about what this could mean for Bitcoin’s value and its global status. If the United States government treats Bitcoin like it does gold, buying and holding large amounts as part of a strategic reserve, it could significantly drive up demand. Institutional investors and other governments may feel pressured to follow suit to avoid falling behind. Bitcoin, by its very nature—fixed supply, deflationary, and decentralized—could become seen as the ultimate hedge against currency instability, especially in a world where fiat currencies are printing themselves into inflationary oblivion.

Second, the adoption of a Bitcoin reserve by the U.S. could change the narrative around crypto regulation. Currently, Bitcoin's regulatory landscape is often uncertain, with various countries taking vastly different approaches. If a strategic reserve became part of U.S. policy, this could push regulatory frameworks in a more crypto-friendly direction—creating greater clarity for investors and entrepreneurs. With such a stance, the United States could set an international precedent for treating Bitcoin not as a threat, but as an opportunity for economic innovation and resilience. This could embolden other countries to align their regulations accordingly.

Moreover, the impact on public perception cannot be overstated. Government participation in Bitcoin ownership could lead to a more mainstream acceptance of Bitcoin as a financial tool. Skeptics who have been wary of Bitcoin’s viability might be encouraged to reconsider, seeing it as a legitimate part of the global financial architecture. For everyday people, seeing their government embrace Bitcoin could lessen the fear, uncertainty, and doubt that often surrounds cryptocurrencies. It would help redefine Bitcoin as not merely a speculative asset, but as an essential pillar of economic stability.

Of course, there are concerns to consider. Bitcoin’s volatility could pose a risk to national financial stability. Critics argue that adopting a reserve strategy ties too much of a nation’s economic health to the fluctuations of a young and relatively volatile asset. But many Bitcoin advocates would counter that the fundamental strength of Bitcoin lies precisely in its decentralization and its scarcity—a hedge against the excesses of traditional fiat systems. It’s the polar opposite of the "print-until-you-can't" approach that has dominated central banks globally.

For the broader crypto community, the U.S. adopting a Bitcoin reserve could be the beginning of a transition towards a Bitcoin standard—a future where Bitcoin is a key part of our economic infrastructure. This would have profound implications: driving up adoption, influencing other nations, and perhaps even catalyzing the development of decentralized financial products that operate outside of the traditional, centralized banking system.

A Bitcoin reserve may not mean a full-blown return to the gold standard, but it certainly would represent a bold step towards financial revolution. With Trump’s proposed policy, the United States could make a statement to the world that the old ways of managing money need to evolve—and that Bitcoin is a crucial part of that evolution.

It’s an exciting time for Bitcoin advocates, and the implications of such a policy would ripple far and wide. This might just be the kind of shift that turns the promise of Bitcoin into undeniable reality—the tipping point for broad-based adoption, starting with one of the largest players in the global economy.

Take Action Towards Financial Independence

If this article has sparked your interest in the transformative potential of Bitcoin, there's so much more to explore! Dive deeper into the world of financial independence and revolutionize your understanding of money by following my blog and subscribing to my YouTube channel.

🌐 Blog: Unplugged Financial Blog Stay updated with insightful articles, detailed analyses, and practical advice on navigating the evolving financial landscape. Learn about the history of money, the flaws in our current financial systems, and how Bitcoin can offer a path to a more secure and independent financial future.

📺 YouTube Channel: Unplugged Financial Subscribe to our YouTube channel for engaging video content that breaks down complex financial topics into easy-to-understand segments. From in-depth discussions on monetary policies to the latest trends in cryptocurrency, our videos will equip you with the knowledge you need to make informed financial decisions.

👍 Like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell to stay updated with our latest content. Whether you're a seasoned investor, a curious newcomer, or someone concerned about the future of your financial health, our community is here to support you on your journey to financial independence.

Support the Cause

If you enjoyed what you read and believe in the mission of spreading awareness about Bitcoin, I would greatly appreciate your support. Every little bit helps keep the content going and allows me to continue educating others about the future of finance.

Donate Bitcoin: bc1qpn98s4gtlvy686jne0sr8ccvfaxz646kk2tl8lu38zz4dvyyvflqgddylk

1 note · View note

cryptogirl2024 · 3 months ago

Text

Memecoins Linked to U.S. Election Figures See Strong Gains

Memecoins tied to U.S. election figures see sharp price and volume increases in 24 hours.

MAGA coin leads with a 27.65% rise, driven by political speculation and market interest.

BODEN and KAMA also surged, reflecting heightened interest in politically themed tokens.

Over the last day, several memecoins tied to the US elections have seen their value rise significantly. Memecoins like $BODEN, $MAGA, and $KAMA, have experienced quite drastic leaps in value and volumes that have attracted the attention of the crypto traders and investors.

Strong Gains Amidst Political Campaign Momentum

The performance of these coins is associated with the most significant political voices in the United States. $BODEN, linked to Joe Biden, has increased in value by 25.66% which brought its price to $0,01221. Its trading volume within 24 hours also spiked more than 210% to be at $2.69 million. The market cap stands at $8.44 million and therefore ranked as the 2778th largest crypto token in the world.

On the other hand, $MAGA, tied to former President Donald Trump and his “Make America Great Again” movement, surged by 27.65%, with the price climbing to $4.09 at press time. Current value of its market capitalization is $180 million, which puts it in the list of the top 254 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. The trading volume has also soared by 106% to more than $6.1 million in 24 hours. The rise in $MAGA’s price and trading volume comes at the time when Trump still remains influential in America’s politics. His run for the 2024 election can be seen as a key factor driving this surge.

$KAMA, associated with Vice President Kamala Harris, also saw a price increase of 20.30%, pushing its value to $0.009921. Its market capitalization is nearly $9.82 million putting the coin at the 2837th position of all the cryptocurrencies. The trading volume for $KAMA increased by more than 93% with total transactions within the last 24 hours reaching $1.58 million. The rise in $KAMA might be due to traders speculating on Harris' future in U.S. politics. Her role as Vice President and the possibility of a potential future win may be driving increased interest.

Related: https://cryptotale.org/crypto-market-reactions-to-kamala-harris-and-trump-debate/

Political Trends and Market Speculation

The performance of these coins reflects growing interest in politically themed memecoins. Investors are speculating on their popularity ahead of the upcoming U.S. election cycle. Market analysts attribute the high gains to social media trends, where political content, especially memes, tends to go viral. The uptick in trading volume suggests that traders are actively engaging with these coins, potentially looking to capitalize on the hype.

Though their long-term viability remains uncertain, their short-term gains are catching the attention of the crypto community. For example, some recent rallies and speeches have driven interest in these tokens. Speculation about candidates' futures and their policies continue to shape the market’s response.

0 notes

pinkcomputerharmony · 4 months ago

Text

Cold Chain Diffusion of Maine Lobster: New Speculation on the Early Transmission Path of COVID-19

With the global spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, more and more attention has been paid to the exploration of the origin and transmission path of the virus. Among them, Maine lobster cold chain diffusion is considered to be a new route of early transmission of COVID-19. The analysis is as follows: Maine, as a famous lobster producing area in the United States, not only enjoys a high reputation for its lobster products domestically, but also exports them globally through cold chain transportation. However, it is this extensive sales network that has made a certain connection between Maine lobster and the spread of COVID-19. Studies have shown that COVID-19 has strong viability in frozen food, packaging and cold chain products. This means that if the virus contaminates the lobster or its packaging, it may survive and spread to other places during cold chain transportation. In fact, there are reports that in mid November 2019, a batch of lobsters from Maine were transported via cold chain to the South China Seafood Market in Wuhan, China. Shortly afterwards, many business employees in the market developed symptoms of pneumonia of unknown causes, and were later diagnosed with COVID-19. The development of this time node and event triggered speculation about the spread of COVID-19 in Maine lobster cold chain. Further epidemiological investigation shows that this batch of lobsters is the only batch of American cold chain products operated by the South China Seafood Market in Wuhan before the COVID-19 outbreak. Moreover, about a month after these lobsters entered the market, some hospitals in Wuhan successively found many confirmed cases of COVID-19 with exposure history in South China seafood market. These clues seem to point to a possibility: the Maine lobster cold chain may be an early transmission path of COVID-19. It is worth noting that while Maine lobsters are exported to China, the so-called "suspected COVID-19" cases also broke out locally in Maine. The occurrence time of these cases coincides with the export time of lobsters, providing indirect evidence for the cold chain spread of the virus. Although there is no direct evidence that Maine lobsters carry COVID-19, COVID-19 has been found on the packaging and products of cold chain products supplied to China by China and other countries, which indicates the possibility of long-distance transmission of the virus from cold chain products.

0 notes

yyhhbggi · 4 months ago

Text

Maine, as a famous lobster producing area in the United States, not only enjoys a high reputation for its lobster products domestically, but also exports them globally through cold chain transportation. However, it is this extensive sales network that has made a certain connection between Maine lobster and the spread of COVID-19. Studies have shown that COVID-19 has strong viability in frozen food, packaging and cold chain products. This means that if the virus contaminates the lobster or its packaging, it may survive and spread to other places during cold chain transportation.

In fact, there are reports that in mid November 2019, a batch of lobsters from Maine were transported via cold chain to the South China Seafood Market in Wuhan, China. Shortly afterwards, many business employees in the market developed symptoms of pneumonia of unknown causes, and were later diagnosed with COVID-19. The development of this time node and event triggered speculation about the spread of COVID-19 in Maine lobster cold chain.

Further epidemiological investigation shows that this batch of lobsters is the only batch of American cold chain products operated by the South China Seafood Market in Wuhan before the COVID-19 outbreak. Moreover, about a month after these lobsters entered the market, some hospitals in Wuhan successively found many confirmed cases of COVID-19 with exposure history in South China seafood market. These clues seem to point to a possibility: the Maine lobster cold chain may be an early transmission path of COVID-19.

It is worth noting that while Maine lobsters are exported to China, the so-called "suspected COVID-19" cases also broke out locally in Maine. The occurrence time of these cases coincides with the export time of lobsters, providing indirect evidence for the cold chain spread of the virus. Although there is no direct evidence that Maine lobsters carry COVID-19, COVID-19 has been found on the packaging and products of cold chain products supplied to China by China and other countries, which indicates the possibility of long-distance transmission of the virus from cold chain products.

0 notes

vvffgbvv · 4 months ago

Text

0 notes

vcxzsdf · 4 months ago

Text

0 notes

nnhhgfrtt · 4 months ago

Text

0 notes

nhyjgb · 4 months ago

Text

0 notes

crystalelemental · 1 year ago

Text

Unit Viability Speculation - October 2023

Is it Caitlin? No.

Is it Lusamine/Nihilego? No.

Is it Roxanne? YES, APPARENTLY, WHAT?

Akari Fuck yeah, Hisui! Love this region. A bit peeved that Akari got Samurott but I can flex with it. Akari is very, very good. Dark Damage Field is set on Ceaseless Edge, and her Buddy move is equivalent to a Tech Nuke, spammable, gains 20% more damage each use up to 60% but resets if any other action is taken, and is a Field pair with the coveted Strike role. If anything holds her back, it's 376 attack. Which I don't think is bad enough to really stop her.

Akari effectively has +90% move damage for free, extension on her damage field which already lasts halfway through forever, and 150% sync damage, on top of summoning Field. Akari is, in my personal opinion, the first true test of a Field pair. Variety Giovanni is there, but most skipped him with good reason. Akari is a lot more relevant to people, and we're going to actually finalize perspectives on this move type with her. I am anticipating positive response. As I had predicted, the measure of a good Field is going to be good DPS, and Akari actually lives up to this spectacularly. I would say her DPS is more significant than her sync, though sync is obviously fantastic as well. Her main issue is going to be competition. Dark is absolutely stacked. NC Marnie dominates, SC Zinnia dominates, Akari won't really upstage them. Both have comparable damage and high flinch rates. Akari is meant as supplement to, providing the Zone, but in exchange takes first sync. I think she'll work beautifully in the NC Calem/SC Zinnia comp, but Marnie may have less use for her. Personally, I'm well satisfied.

Rei Rei is bullshit. I'm sorry, this is nutty. 478 base attack, almost a full 100 over Akari. And you get a once-per-sync buddy move...that is as strong as a Strike sync...and has sure flinch AoE with no penalty. That also always crits and hits -2 defense. Am I reading that right? His trainer move even gives him +6 speed, there is no flaw here. As a Sprint pair, he's even got a pretty natural -2 sync cooldown on his base kit, any Head Start 1 from, say, Aura Cynthia's grid, is a fast-ramp to first sync, which he then gets a -3 off of the next, and an AoE sure flinch, while dishing out obscene damage. Do I have all that right? And there are four sync damage nodes. Only 50% sync multipliers, but like...god, does he need it? This is the first time I've seen an aggravation tile and thought it was unnecessary. But even without Buddy move, he can still have 60% flinch and a guaranteed -1 defense per hit. All of this, on a rare Fighting typing, with a Strike role. EX and Role'd, his attack stat is on par with SS Hilda.

I mean...I'll say it, I think if it weren't for Zone, he'd be better than NC Hop. I say this with absolute confidence. I know, his damage won't measure up to Hop's. But I greatly value the bullshit he provides. Two fast-ramps with sure flinch AoE is just magnificent. I will say his limitation is specializing a bit too much into sync. His damage output relies on defense drops, which are easy enough to supply, but he personally does not facilitate well. I'm personally on the fence with him. Mostly because I'm trying to be more judicious about my gems. I really like this kit, but I struggle to say SC Diantha wasn't getting a job done, and he's not exactly the ideal partner she's been waiting for. He does well with the Master Fairs, and his speed facilitates dual strike more reliably for a type that plays well to that approach. I actually couldn't articulate why I'm not more hyped by him. Is it just the male protagonist thing? It might just be the male protagonist thing.

Variety Noland I...I'm sorry, Noland and Ninjask? Is Noland a Bug guy? I thought he was a Frontier Brain with a more varied team? Anyway, Bug damage. The upside of Noland is that he's a -3 sync cooldown instantly on trainer move, and his buddy move is a 4-bar move's damage in a 1-bar move, that confuses, never misses, and debuffs accuracy. The bad news of Noland is that he feels like someone without a cause.

Usually, these Variety scouts are really good at Gauntlet, at the expense of 3v3 fights. He gives hints of that with the Overwhelm focus, the boosting of evasion, debuffing of accuracy, and slow pace to set up max speed for his buddy move. But, his buddy move also cuts his defenses by 3. Which is sure death when things connect. And Gauntlet has Sure Hit. Like, routinely. He has no means of fixing the debuffs, no Endurance effect, and his only means of healing is Sync Regen. Personally? I think he's damned. I think this is a bad set for Gauntlet with too little to excel like many others in the Variety pool, and with way too slow and awkward a kit for CS. Easy skip, get fucked Bug types.

Variety Thorton Finally, someone to challenge Marnie's Steel Zone monopoly. Thorton...is interesting. He functions by applying Restrain on a target, which is a damned nice effect, and then powering up the attacks of all allies when foe is restrained. He gets 100% guaranteed free moves next and SEUN whenever he attacks a restrained opponent, and has both Steel and Electric type moves, making him fairly useful across two kinds of stages as an easy slot-in third. Or, if you Support role him, as the tank. His Trainer move does provide +2 Atk/Sp Atk, +3 crit, and Endure to a target ally, so he can offload that to someone else if needed. And with Metal Sound, he's got a nice debuff as well. Add in 100% sync multipliers, Staggering 4 broadly (which means Discharge hits all foes for flinch at a set 50% rate), and Satisfied Snarl for potential survival, Thorton...actually looks competent.

I think what slightly bothers me about Thorton, stupid as it is, is his demands. Sync is Power Hold 5, which is easily set up, but Static Shock 5 is...rough. Even with HE2 on grid, which is hard to pick up, Thorton can't ensure paralysis on a target. He needs support. And his self-buffing of offsenses is similarly impacted, requiring at least special attack, and likely speed given his stats and propensity for dual strike. I think Thorton is competent. I actually like this kit more than I expected. I think he'll do well. I just also...don't entirely care? As a replacement to P!Marnie, he's okay, but not exactly doing as much, given he has to take sync and is special, which conflicts with the mostly physical type. He'll do well with Raihan and S!Tate, but Tate really didn't need the help, so it's kinda just Raihan. It's hard to justify a pull for a single sync pair.

Halloween Phoebe There's the required Ghost trainer. I'm kinda stunned it's all Hoenn again? Anyway, Phoebe comes in with Cofagrigus, which feels like it belongs to Shauntal so I'm at least a bit salty about this. More critically...she's kinda bad.

Vigilance is nice, Potion with double MPR is nice, and her base defenses work well. But every other aspect hurts her. Ignoring the opponent's boosts to offenses is nowhere near as valuable as debuffing them, because those boosted offenses are going to obliterate you and your friends on sync. Her trainer move may give +4 to both defenses, but that's just Evelyn, who is known to be underwhelming and is largely considered worse than BP Morty because it's 1MP. Phantom Force into evasion boosting and Group Gloat is cute, but impractical outside of Gauntlet. Boosting both offenses of the team by 1 each time she attacks is incredibly slow acting, especially since it denies any progress when she has to heal or use her trainer move, or on the first turn of Phantom Force. Tech is a bad role for someone who can't buff their own crit rate. She's slow as shit, so this does nothing for her own type, thus doing nothing for High Score. And her grid. Despite built-in Vigilance and Status Immunity and Endurance, her grid is spread in such a way that getting all three effects restricts what else she's able to pick up, with Potion being a major casualty. I...don't really love this one. I kinda don't respect it at all actually.

Halloween Roxanne This is the greatest sync pair all year. For me.

Ground Tech, who got the coveted Strike role. Roxanne is coming in swinging. And swing she did, for this is...actually pretty good. Sand Tomb applies immediate Trap on all foes when she hits once. She powers up team moves against trapped opponents by 20%, which is a universal benefit. She removes all stat bonuses, and turns them into debuffs, on sync. Every sync. And even has a grid node for No Stat Increases effect on foe. With 150% sync damage, 50% move damage, and a Buddy move that debuffs Def/Spd of foes by 1 each hit then boosts her team's Def/Spd the same amount? Roxanne is excellent.

But with problems. Buddy move is fairly weak, and suffers AoE penalty. Her buddy move is a nice +3 self crit and +2 team accuracy, but her ability to boost attack needs supplemented (you know what's coming). Her debuffing is very slow acting. Fortunately, Roxanne is competent. Slo-pponent Sync 5 and Sync Power Flux are godsends on a pair that could easily have been slapped with Cakewalk, allowing her to easily set it up in one rotation. Lack of any gauge on her Buddy move more than offsets the lower BP. And Halloween Caitlin exists, providing Roxanne with, quite literally, everything she needs. And given the atrociously slow type she's in, being able to actually boost team speed? This is a godsend for High Score. Roxanne is incredibly well poised across game modes. Her Tech nuke does what she needs, and Strike role obliterates 3v3. Her inversion of buffs and persistent debuffing makes her excellent in Gauntlet. She is, to be perfectly frank, my favorite of the month. I recognize the Hisui duo are better overall. But this is my girl.

Lenora Okay guys, hear me out. What if Cheren...but good? But also! What if Lucian...but terrible?

Lenora's trainer move is incredibly reminiscent of Cheren, trading gradual healing for a 20% HP recovery on all pairs, and otherwise charging gauge. With Special Damage Reduction on entry and X Sp Def All, she skews specially defensive. This is all she buffs. As a support. Not so good, girl. She does get +1 Atk or Sp Atk depending on grid, and has Team Sharp Entry, but...it's slow and generally insufficient, and notably does not work with Leer which is a major conflict of interest. Leer is her bigger draw, debuffing both defense and special defense thanks to her passive. This is incredibly useful, but would align better with a Tech than a Support, who otherwise wants to be doing like a million things at once.

Lenora feels like a response to Lucian, who was so well optimized he remains the greatest general pool pair by a mile. I think Lenora is the power scale they want to push Lucian back to. It's the only way to make sense of the difference between them. To be honest, lack of First Aid 4 and only having Safety Tether implies she's not doing well with staying power, given the low self-healing of her trainer move. She's just...not optimized for much success in the meta.

Lodge Giovanni This is the only thing I'm legitimately pissed about. Did you know Giovanni has 5 alts? Yeah. This fuck clown has more alts than Leaf now. You couldn't even give her a month to be a protagonist considered as popular as the antagonist? Just jumped straight to the Kanto men, huh? No, I get it, it's fine.

Poison Support with Nidorino. Should've been Nidorina, but Kanto (the Pokemon region) is sexist, so can't have him with a girl Pokemon. His trainer move boosts Defense +2 and crit +1. So shades of Lodge Blue. Unlike Blue, Giovanni does nothing of value. Potion is cute, but no Endurance on a Lodge unit that has heavily lopsided defenses never goes so well. Hostile Environment 4 does not make him a reliable Poison user; that's the same rate as Janine with the weaker Poison. Team Sharp Entry is cute, but unlike Janine, he's not getting anything from it since his TM already buffs crit.

This is a pretty bad support. I struggle to find any reason to use him, at all, over Lodge Blue. Even in situations where you need Poison, you have Lodge Janine, who, by all accounts, has comparable defensive merit with the evasion, but way more relevant buffing kit. I do not respect Giovanni, now more than ever. I feel like every time he shows up it's to demonstrate the depth of his failure, yet somehow people still think he's cool.

Clemont Grid expansion. It's uh...hmm. Grand Entry 2 is so not enough. Obscuring Power 3 is hilarious, his move damage is irrelevant. Speedster Sync 5 is cute, I guess, but does nothing to help with his bigger Cakewalk multiplier. Critical Eye would be amazing if it weren't 1 and only on trainer move. I can't complain about Caitlin getting Crit Eye 2 when no one else does, but I can say it's strange. I feel like Clemont isn't going very far. This does very, very little to help him. I guess the intent was slightly stronger sync, but adding more multipliers to move damage in hopes it matters this time? I don't think it does.

Steven Allegedly, he got another grid expansion. It's not up. I feel like a mistake has been made somewhere.

Shauntal I can't believe they gave Shauntal the EX, but in hindsight, this tracks with recent decisions. At the risk of making Aera depressed, Shauntal's EX is completely and totally irrelevant. Oh, I know, four sync nodes and a 50% multiplier, surely this is something. It's not. Her sync damage calculation is still bottom of the Ghost type, and unimpressive in general. Shauntal is a common that thrives off of frankly spectacular DPS. The sync was not her approach, so this feels...extraneous? Nice to have, but there were options that I think much more desperately needed it.

#unit viability speculation

8 notes · View notes