#uk independence party (ukip)

[meganelixabethh]

In light of Biden stepping down and Kamala Harris potentially being the presidential candidate, I have seen Americans begin to have the debate online about why they should vote for Kamala when they don’t agree with her actions. As an English person I want to talk to you about this because we’ve just done this like a month ago.

Let me briefly introduce you to the British voting system- each country is split into sections that- at one time- had roughly equal populations and each one is called a constituency. Each constituency has an elected leader called a Member of Parliament (we call them MPs so I will be using that term moving forwards) and each of them has a seat in parliament and is able to cast the vote for their constituency on behalf of the people who voted them in. Most MPs are affiliated with either the Conservative Party (colloquially referred to as the ‘tories’ and most similar to the Republican Party) or the Labour Party (no nickname, like the Democrats). There are other parties such as The Liberal Democrats, The Green Party, Reform UK, The DUP, UKIP, BNP and there are even a few MPs who are independent and therefore not affiliated with any party. The general idea is that all the MPs who are in the same party will vote the same way, so if you have over half of the seats in parliament affiliated with your party, you are prime minister and you can usually expect your party to vote the things in that you endorse. This is a TLDR of the British system so it’s way more complicated than this but all this to say, if a party gets 326 seats they have the power.

In 2010 the Tories gained a majority over the Labour Party for the first time in 13 years, and immediately began stripping money out of public services and funnelling this to Tory donors (again I just want to take a moment to say all this is very complicated and I’m glossing over a lot so missing a lot of nuance) so essentially we were paying tax and that money was just not going towards sustaining our national infrastructure. In 2016 Brexit happened and this worsened the problem. In 2019 there was a concerted effort from the left to get the tories out, and while the tories needed to be propped up by The DUP, they maintained their majority. Enter COVID. Our already crumbling public services were put under a level of pressure they simply could not sustain. People were going bankrupt trying to heat their homes during winter, food prices spiralled, schools crumbled both physically and metaphorically. You can’t get a GP appointment to save your life. People are dying in corridors at A&E after waiting 9 hours to be seen. You can’t buy a house nor can you rent one and homelessness soared. The future is bleak here. Children are starving. But it’s fine- life goes on- you come to understand how the people you read about in history books carried on like they did. You come to grow used to living in unprecedented times as everyone else in the world seems to be. You complain to your colleagues about how long it will take to get through to the doctors to try and get a repeat prescription, you turn the heating off in another room and eventually just take to getting in bed as soon as you get home in winter. You know someone who has a wood burning stove so you consider how often is too often to invite yourself over. As you sew up the rip in the seam of your jeans again, you wonder if the world was actually better before 2010 or if everything just seemed better because you were a kid. You know whatever the answer to that question is, you never struggled to get a doctors appointment back then.

Our elections don’t function quite like yours- they don’t happen at a set time. The ruling party have to dissolve parliament to call an election, and they have to do it within 5 years of their last win. The normal convention is 4 years, but 5 is what’s actually in the law. We knew the tories would try to cling on to power as long as they could- so we knew it would be 2024 before we got an election. We had a local election when we would usually have a general election, but finally, FINALLY, on a rainy day, the prime minister told an angry people that we would have an election in six short weeks and we immediately had exactly the same argument you’re currently having. The left argued back and forth about whether tactical voting is moral and if moral voting was actually enough to dig us out of the nightmare. We considered the party leaders actions, we agreed that we didn’t like them, that he was basically in the centre, that he supported the genocide in Palestine and that he didn’t do enough to protect trans people, that he wasn’t what we WANTED. And then we looked at the burned out husk of our lives and we voted for him anyway. He is now Prime Minister and Labour have a very significant majority.

He’s scrapped the Rwanda Scheme (very expensive scheme to ship asylum seekers who reach Britain to Rwanda for some reason?), he’s lifted an onshore wind ban that’s prevented the country expanding its green energy infrastructure for the last decade to try and reduce energy prices, he’s made more progress with striking doctors in about 3 days than the tories did in years, announced plans to nationalise major infrastructure back from private industry, held water companies to account for dumping raw sewage in our waters and ordered an immediate assessment of public funds to try and stop so much public money pouring out of infrastructure after 14 years of Tory restructuring (to make themselves richer if you remember from above). He’s only been in about a month. I was 13 when the tories took power, and for the first time almost since I can remember, there’s a very small stirring of… hope I think? The nightmare might be over soon.

He’s not perfect and neither are Labour, but if I have a choice between being shot in the face and drinking cyanide, I’d drink the cyanide because I might live to drink another glass of water that’s got less cyanide in it. There is no best, there is only better; and if we keep voting for better we might end up at the best we wanted in the beginning. Sometimes, you just have to vote for better and hope. She might not be what you want, but she’s probably not going to set the world on fire and play the fiddle while it burns, and that might have to do for now unfortunately.

[maturemenoftvandfilms]

David Manners, 11th Duke of Rutland Born: May 8, 1959, England Physique: Husky Build

David Charles Robert Manners, 11th Duke of Rutland, is a British hereditary peer and landowner. Rutland is the elder son of Charles Manners, the 10th Duke of Rutland. He succeeded his father in the titles on 4 January 1999. The Duke was a high-profile supporter of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and has hosted fundraising events at Belvoir Castle.

Judging a book by its cover, he seems like the type who fucks a lot and will cheat as soon as he's not getting enough sex. Wait... so he's separated in 2012 from his wife with whom he had five children. Called it. And they've been living together ever since his affair with separate partners.  

[logray]

That post about how you can quietly consider genocide a non-issue and refuse to factor it into your voting choices really reveals the conservatism that these so-called leftists are operating on.

The UK Independence Party, one of the most explicitly racist and xenophobic parties in Britain, is really popular in the more rural areas of the country, like the farming region I was raised in. This isn't even directly because of the policies I just mentioned -- their fiscal policy is really strong for the most part and, more importantly, they have a lot of policy that directly appeals to farming communities.

These people mostly (and hilariously) consider themselves leftists. There's a guy who lives on my old street, and has lived there for over 20 years, and has voted for UKIP in every single election in my living memory despite being an immigrant himself. He considers himself progressive.

It's because they hand-wave the racism and xenophobia away. They disregard it as a non-issue to justify voting for a party that will more greatly benefit themselves and their loved ones in other ways.

If you decide genocide isn't enough of an issue to sway your vote because you know both candidates are awful but you'd prefer to vote for the one that will less significantly harm yourself and your community domestically, that's your prerogative, but please for the love of fucking god don't try and pretend you're any better than the hundreds of thousands of conservatives who decided their own best interests are more important than protecting people and communities of colour.

[thecpdiary]

The Unseen Costs of Brexit

Brexit has undeniably altered the UK’s relationship with the EU and had significant consequences on various aspects of daily life, from travel and living abroad to education and employment opportunities. Through writing, I focus on the points that drive home the message of the tangible impacts of Brexit and the need for progressive leadership.

A Call for Change Brexit was sold as a move to reclaim sovereignty and control, but the reality for many has been a profound loss. As we navigate the aftermath, it becomes increasingly clear that the promises made have led to unforeseen consequences for all citizens.

Political Reaction

Immigration became a central issue in political debates. Parties and movements advocating for Brexit, such as the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and the Leave campaign, capitalised on public concerns about immigration. They argued that leaving the EU would allow the UK to regain control over its borders and immigration policy.

Loss of Freedom to Travel and Live Abroad

The ability to travel and live freely across EU countries has been curtailed. For many, this has meant giving up dreams of retiring in sunny Spain, pursuing careers in cosmopolitan cities like Paris or Berlin, or even just experiencing the richness of European cultures firsthand. Travel Restrictions

Visa requirements and limited stays in EU countries have replaced our previously seamless travel experience.

Relocation Barriers

Moving abroad now involves complex immigration processes, impacting those who once planned to retire, study or work in the EU. Education and Employment Opportunities

Younger generations, who were just beginning to explore their futures, have been particularly hard hit. The opportunities to study, live, and work in the EU, which were once easily accessible, have become complicated and prohibitively expensive. Erasmus Withdrawal

Students have lost access to the Erasmus+ programme, which provided opportunities to study across Europe, enriching their academic and cultural experiences.

Job Market Challenges

Employment in the EU now comes with additional hurdles, limiting career prospects that were once easily accessible and attainable. Economic and Social Impact

Brexit’s economic fallout has led to job losses and business closures. The promise of newfound economic prosperity seems hollow as industries struggle and communities face financial uncertainty. Trade Barriers

New tariffs and regulations have disrupted supply chains, increased costs and have created many challenges for businesses, especially small enterprises.

Social Division

The referendum and its aftermath have deepened societal divisions, with communities becoming polarised and national discourse often mired in conflict. Politicians' Disconnect

While many politicians who championed Brexit continue to lead comfortable lives, still enjoying the benefits of EU residency or citizenship, ordinary citizens are now facing the brunt of the fallout. The Hypocrisy of Brexit

David Cameron, Nigel Farage, and Boris Johnson who appear to remain unaffected, highlighting a glaring disparity between the rhetoric used to amass votes, and the reality for the average person. There is a growing need to hold leaders accountable for the promises made versus the outcomes delivered. A Call to Action: Make Your Vote Count

As we approach the General Election, it is crucial to advocate for politicians who recognise the damage done and are willing to pursue policies that can repair and rebuild our connections with the EU. We need leaders with vision and a commitment to reversing the detrimental impacts of Brexit. Support Forward-Thinking Leaders

Choose candidates who are focused on restoring opportunities, enhancing economic stability and fostering unity both within the UK and with our European neighbours; advocate for policies that will ease travel, education and employment barriers, ensuring that future generations do not miss out on the opportunities we have taken for granted. Brexit has undoubtedly changed the landscape of the UK. By voting and demanding accountability, we can strive towards a future that reclaims the lost freedoms and opportunities, ensuring a brighter and more inclusive path moving forward. This approach underscores the concrete impacts of Brexit while appealing to a sense of agency and the need for action, encouraging us to vote for much needed change in the upcoming election.

Informed Writing for Democracy I hope my efforts to write about these issues will contribute to a more informed electorate. Writing about important topics can inform and educate the public, which is essential for a healthy democracy. By sharing my perspectives and insights, I aim to spark conversations, challenge prevailing narratives and encourage others to think critically about the issues that matter when choosing the party they vote for.

For more relatable, inspirational and lifestyle blogs, please check out my site https://www.thecpdiary.com

[eaglesnick]

Smart people instinctively understand the dangers of entrusting our future to self-serving leaders who use our institutions, whether in the corporate or social sectors, to advance their own interests.   James C Colins

I discussed yesterday the catastrophic consequences of David Cameron’s policy of austerity, one academic study claiming 333,000 excess deaths can be attributed to the cuts to public services and benefits  inflicted by Cameron as part of his austerity package.

Needless to say, it was the poor that suffered while the rich became richer still. The hardships of austerity were for ordinary working people to endure, not the rich friends of the Tory Party.

“We often hear David Cameron say: "We're all in this together." The truth is that Mr Cameron and his cabinet of millionaires sit there in a pool of cash whilst there are over three million children in Britain living in poverty. Under the Tories, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Whether it's dinners for donors in Downing Street or giving millionaires a tax-cut, it's the same old Tories who leave all the ordinary hard-working people of this country to suffer.” (HUFFPOST: 25/01/14)

After a further five years of austerity nothing had changed:

“Rich getting richer while poor get poorer, official figures show – with ‘Brexit and benefits freeze to blame'."  (Independent: 26/02/19)

Not only was Cameron (together with George Osborne) responsible for the devastating cuts to public service funding and benefit payments, but he also led us into the quagmire that was Brexit.

Whatever your views on Brexit, it has been an economic disaster for this country and the blame for this can be squarely laid at the door of David Cameron.

"Many will never forgive him for the almost offhand way he steered Britain into an unnecessary Brexit cul-de-sac, and the ramifications of his mistake continue to cast a pall over the country."  (Evening Standard: 14/11/23)

The Evening Standard, is usually a Tory supporting newspaper but even they recognise that Cameron was being totally self-serving in calling for a referendum on our membership of the EU, a decision that had more to do with saving the Tory Party (and his premiership) from the consequences of a right-wing split and the rise of UKIP to Tory MP seats.

“Cameron chose to commit to a vote, not because the country’s population was clamouring for one but because a significant minority of his own MPs, many of them frustrated by the constraints of coalition, were demanding that he do so – some because they feared that UKIP would cost them their seat (or the seats of too many of their colleagues) at the next election, some because they wanted out of the European Union and were more than happy to leverage that fear to their advantage.” (ukandeu.ac.uk: Why David Cameron called the 2016 referendum – and why he lost’ : 04/10/22)

As if this were not enough, Cameron was not averse to using his political connections to potentially line his own pockets after he had resigned as PM. In 2022, MP’s condemned Cameron for lobbying on behalf of his banking employer, Greensill.

“The Treasury select committee said in July 2021 that it was inappropriate of the ex-prime minister to send 62 messages to former colleagues pleading for them to help the controversial bank, for which he worked and in which he owned stock options that could have been worth tens of millions of pounds.” (Guardian: 13/11/23)

Cameron also risked the security of this country by cosying up to China. Declaring that he was determined to make Britain Beijing’s partner of choice, he signed  £40bn worth of deals with China claiming:

“What this really means is jobs, it means livelihoods, it means security.”

Whatever else it meant it did not mean security.

“China represents the "largest state-based threat" to Britain's economic security, Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden has told the BBC. It comes as figures show the government intervened in eight attempted takeovers of UK firms by Chinese buyers last year over national security fears.”  (BBC News: 11/07/23)

It did however mean a job for David Cameron:

“Former British PM Cameron gets new job as vice-chairman of China-UK fund.” (The Straits Times: 19/12/17)

Cameron, like many Tories, is a man who, despite his patriotic rhetoric, is prepared to put the Conservative Party and his own career above the best interests of the country as a whole. He is a man of poor economic judgement, a man who acts for the benefit of his rich friends and is quite prepared to endanger our security of our nation  for the short term benefit of making a few extra pounds.  He is not fit to be Foreign Secretary and Rishi Sunak should never have appointed him.

[aqueerpolysocialist]

The BBC have published a really interesting piece about the history of the movement for Scottish independence, written by Alan Little through the lens of his own lifetime as a Scot. It's a really good piece and I encourage people interested to read the whole thing! There's a couple of key sections I think are interesting more generally for UK politics too though.

This is something that comes up again and again - there's a great line in the film Pride for example about how the seam of coal that's mined in Wales is geologically the same as the one mined in Kentucky, and that you can take a Welsh miner and put him in a pit in Kentucky and he'll recognise that coal. The shared pride in their work and the solidarity built by dedicated union organisers for so much of the 20th century brought people together within and across nations, to see themselves as more alike than they were different. And then came Thatcher, and Reagan, and "there is no such thing as society".

The really deep divides that Thatcher and her governments slashed across this country are nowhere clearer than at Hadrian's Wall. You can find Tories in the north, you can find Tories in Wales, but my god you'll struggle to find Tories in Scotland.

And of course this sets the scene for the SNP by creating the Scottish Parliament, and 18 years later Labour had collapsed in Scotland too, anger at the continued lack of Scottish representation and the failures of New Labour leaving traditional left wing Labour voters looking for an alternative, and finding it in the SNP. In England, this has variously expressed itself in greater vote share for the Liberal Democrats until they betrayed the country in 2010 by entering the coalition government, by increased vote share for the Green Party, by the moment of popularity for UKIP that gave us Brexit, and most of all by an ever-increasing apathy and abstention from politics.

So in conclusion, fuck Thatcher, fuck the Tories, fuck Labour for abandoning everything and everyone they stood for, fuck the whole damn system. Learn the lesson that we were better off when the unions had real power and get organising.

Link to Alan Little's article:

BBC News - Allan Little: The story of Scottish independence - what next?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64761495

[mouthpiecengr]

Why I Founded Yoruba Party In UK - Dr Olusola Oni 

The YPUK wants the British public to know about the … That we did not cede the Yoruba country to Britain and Britain had no jurisdiction; that Britain stole our sovereignty in the act of Amalgamation of 1914… Nigel Farage’s UK Independence Party (UKIP) has demonstrated what a small party could achieve without having a parliamentary majority. UKIP showed how a small party could change the course…

[influencertoday]

From Aristocracy to Crypto: George Cottrell's Million-Dollar Bet and Controversy

The world of high-stakes poker is a thrilling yet unforgiving landscape. Among the players who navigate its intense atmosphere is George Cottrell, a name that has become synonymous with both immense wealth and dramatic losses at the tables. His story, intertwined with brushes with controversy, paints a fascinating picture of risk, reward, and the allure of the big bet.

From Island Life to Expulsion: A Privileged Background with a Gambling Spark

Born into an aristocratic British family, Cottrell's life began on the private island of Mustique. His maternal uncle held a prestigious position in the House of Lords, and his upbringing was steeped in privilege. However, Cottrell's adventurous spirit manifested early on, leading to his expulsion from Malvern College for – you guessed it – illegal gambling. This event foreshadowed the path he would later forge in the high-stakes poker world.

A Controversial Figure: Legal Issues and Political Connections

Cottrell's past includes a stint in a US prison for wire fraud, casting a shadow over his public image. Despite this, he has managed to maintain connections within British political circles, with reports suggesting ties to prominent figures like Nigel Farage, a former leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP). These associations add another layer of intrigue to Cottrell's already complex persona.

The High Roller: Astronomical Wins and Devastating Losses in George Cottrell Poker

Cottrell's true domain lies at the poker table, where he has established himself as a player unafraid of enormous wagers. News reports detail him participating in games with astronomical buy-ins, sometimes reaching a staggering $20 million a night. These forays into the world of George Cottrell poker have yielded mixed results. While undoubtedly capable of winning big, he has also been on the receiving end of some truly epic losses.

One particularly notorious incident involved a private high-stakes game in Montenegro. According to reports, Cottrell faced off against a table filled with Chinese billionaires, Hollywood celebrities, and poker superstars. The night ended with Cottrell reportedly losing a staggering £16 million (approximately $18.7 million). This event sent shockwaves through the poker world, solidifying Cottrell's reputation as a high roller willing to take incredible risks.

The Psychology of High-Stakes Poker: Beyond the Money

There's more to George Cottrell poker than just the astronomical sums involved. High-stakes poker is a mental and emotional marathon. Players must possess exceptional skills in areas like reading opponents, managing risk, and maintaining composure under immense pressure. Cottrell's willingness to gamble such vast amounts speaks to a certain psychological makeup – a blend of confidence, calculated risk-taking, and perhaps even a touch of recklessness.

The Allure and Peril of the High Roller Lifestyle

The world of George Cottrell poker is undeniably captivating. The potential for life-changing wins and the adrenaline rush of high-stakes competition are undeniable draws. However, the potential downsides are equally significant. The risk of crippling financial losses and the strain on mental well-being are real dangers for those who venture into this realm.

Beyond the Headlines: The Man Behind the Name

While the media often portrays Cottrell through the lens of his high-stakes exploits, there's likely more to the man than meets the eye. Understanding his motivations, his strategies at the table, and the human element behind the headlines remains an ongoing puzzle.

The Future of George Cottrell Poker: Risks and Rewards Remain

George Cottrell's journey in the world of high-stakes poker is far from over. Whether he emerges victorious in future games or faces more setbacks remains to be seen. One thing is certain: George Cottrell poker will continue to be a source of fascination, a reminder of the high-stakes drama that unfolds at the green felt table.

For more visit Influencer Today.

[usnewsper-politics]

Nigel Farage Slams ITV Drama Series for Promoting Far-Right Party: No Surrender #farrightpoliticalparty #ITVdramaseries #mediarepresentation #NigelFarage #NoSurrender

[olko71]

New Post has been published on All about business online

New Post has been published on https://yaroreviews.info/2023/07/natwest-boss-dame-alison-rose-quits-after-row-over-nigel-farage-account

NatWest boss Dame Alison Rose quits after row over Nigel Farage account

PA Media

NatWest boss Dame Alison Rose has resigned hours after admitting she had made a mistake in speaking about Nigel Farage’s relationship with the bank.

She had been heavily criticised for being the source of an inaccurate BBC report about Mr Farage’s account at Coutts, which is part of NatWest Group.

The announcement came just hours after NatWest said it had full confidence in her in continuing to lead the bank.

Dame Alison had admitted a “serious error of judgment”.

In a statement released early on Wednesday morning, NatWest Group chairman Sir Howard Davies said: “The board and Alison Rose have agreed, by mutual consent, that she will step down as chief executive of the NatWest Group.

“It is a sad moment.”

In a separate statement, Dame Alison thanked her colleagues “for all that they [had] done”, saying: “I remain immensely proud of the progress the bank has made in supporting people, families and business across the UK, and building the foundations for sustainable growth.”

Following her resignation, ex UKIP leader Mr Farage told the BBC it had taken a long time for Dame Alison to resign.

“The first rule of banking is client confidentiality. She [Dame Alison] clearly broke that.”

He said that anybody in a more junior position at the bank would have been “out of the door”.

Dame Alison had come under mounting pressure from Downing Street, the chancellor and other senior cabinet ministers to resign, with the BBC told there were “significant concerns” over her conduct.

Mr Farage, the former leader of the UK Independence Party and Brexiteer, first reported in early July that his account had been closed and said he had not been given a reason.

The BBC reported that it was closed because he no longer met the wealth threshold for Coutts, citing a source familiar with the matter. It has since apologised for its inaccurate report.

Mr Farage subsequently obtained a document looking at his suitability as a Coutts customer.

The 40-page document flagged concerns that he was “xenophobic and racist”, and also questioned the reputational risk of having Mr Farage as a client. It said that to have Mr Farage as a customer was not consistent with Coutts’ “position as an inclusive organisation” given his “publicly stated views”.

Mr Farage, had highlighted what he said was a discrepancy between the BBC’s apology on Monday from CEO Deborah Turness, which said the BBC had gone back to the source to check the information, and NatWest’s statement on Tuesday. “There is no way, if the BBC went back for a second time to confirm the story that they would not have checked that it was the balance of my account that led to that commercial decision,” he said.

Confidentiality key

City minister Andrew Griffith said it was “right” that Dame Alison had resigned from NatWest, which is 39% owned by the taxpayer.

“This would never have happened if NatWest had not taken it upon itself to withdraw a bank account due to someone’s lawful political views. That was and is always unacceptable,” he said.

Freddy Colquhoun, investment director at the wealth management company JM Finn, told 5 Live’s Wake up to Money the resignation was inevitable: “I think as soon as you lose the confidence of Downing Street, who is also a major shareholder, then something needs to change quite quickly.

“Confidentiality, it is one of the major pillars of trust between the clients and the bank.”

Dame Alison said she had not revealed any personal financial information about Mr Farage, but admitted she had left the BBC’s business editor Simon Jack “with the impression that the decision to close Mr Farage’s accounts was solely a commercial one.”

She said she was wrong to respond to any question raised by the BBC about the case.

Paul Thwaite, Natwest’s current chief executive of its commercial and institutional business, will take over Dame Alison’s responsibilities for an initial period of 12 months, pending regulatory approval.

Related Topics

BBC

Nigel Farage

NatWest Group

Banking

More on this story

BBC says sorry to Farage over account closure story

1 day ago

Banks warned against closing accounts over politics

3 July

[nrspeculator]

Central bank digital currencies control your money and take away your freedoms?

This article shows that government control of bank accounts to attack political enemies is already here. Nigel Farage is a popular UK politician and public figure. He was a member of the European Parliament and leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP). Farage is best known as the leader of the Brexit movement that successfully led the UK exit from the EU following a referendum to leave in…

[thegnmsolution]

Nigel Farage: UK Banks Closing Accounts For Political Reasons Nigel Farage is the latest alleged victim; if so, this is very wrong & needs sunlight, we need this in the public space to ensure cannot ...

Site logo image brianpeckford posted: " happen in US, etc. I fear happenss in Canada daily! What have you heard? Your experience? NE - NAKEDEMPEROR.SUBSTACK.COM DR. PAUL ALEXANDER JUN 30, 2023 Nigel Farage is a divisive character in the UK - in the same way Trump is in the" peckford42 Nigel Farage: UK Banks Closing Accounts For Political Reasons Nigel Farage is the latest alleged victim; if so, this is very wrong & needs sunlight, we need this in the public space to ensure cannot brianpeckford Jul 1 happen in US, etc. I fear happenss in Canada daily! What have you heard? Your experience? NE - NAKEDEMPEROR.SUBSTACK.COM DR. PAUL ALEXANDER JUN 30, 2023 Nigel Farage is a divisive character in the UK - in the same way Trump is in the US. Of course I’m generalising but if you speak to someone from the ‘metropolitan liberal elite’ or someone who passionately voted for Britain to remain in the European Union (EU), Nigel is the anti-Christ. Farage is a former politician who very successfully lead the UK Independence Party (UKIP) until the Brexit referendum in 2016. It could be argued that the UK voted to leave the EU in 2016 due to the larger than life personalities of Farage and Boris Johnson. He was also a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) where he often criticised the EU in his scathing/humorous/cringey speeches. Alexander COVID News-Dr. Paul Elias Alexander's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Since leaving politics, Nigel has become a broadcaster and recently won “News Presenter of the Year” at the Television and Radio Industries Club (TRIC) Awards. He is right-wing but not far-right as many like to claim. UKIP was an awkward political party and did have some strange characters in it. There were some in UKIP who were too far to the right and some of their policies were questionable but many ignored those because they just wanted to leave the EU. Leaving the EU was as divisive as Covid vaccines. You aren’t anti-vax if you’ve had all your previous injections but don’t want the novel gene therapy, you are just anti-novel untested gene therapies. Similarly, you weren’t anti-European or racist if you wanted to leave the political institution of the EU, you were just anti-EU. Today, Farage claimed that his career is being attacked and “the establishment are trying to force me out of the UK by closing my bank accounts”. He said that within the last few months his bank account was closed with no explanation. /I have been with the same banking group since 1980. I’ve had my personal accounts with them since that date and my business accounts right through the 1990s when I worked in the City of London and in recent years too. I’m with one of the subsidiaries of this big banking group, one with a very prestigious name, but I won’t name them just yet. I got a phone call a couple of months ago, to say ‘we are closing your accounts’, I asked why…no reason was given. I was told a letter would come, which would explain everything. The letter came through and simply said, we are closing your accounts, we want to finish it all by a date, which is around about now. I didn’t quite know what to make of it. I complained. I emailed the chairman, a lackey phoned me to say that it was a commercial decision, which I have to say, I don’t believe for a single moment./ Nigel says there is nothing irregular or unusual in what he does. The payments that go in and out every month are pretty much the same. He also keeps a large positive cash balance. He thinks this is happening to him because a few years ago the EU came up with a definition of somebody called a PEP - a Politically Exposed Person. A PEP is an individual who holds or has held a significant public office, and due to their position, they might be more susceptible to involvement in corruption or bribery. The term can also include their family members and close associates. Financial institutions often apply enhanced due diligence when dealing with PEPs due to the increased risk of money laundering and terrorist financing. Being a PEP does not indicate wrongdoing but simply a higher risk factor requiring additional scrutiny. So anybody in public office, whether part of the government or a local councillor, can be designated a PEP. Once you are a PEP, the banks say they have increased costs for compliance, so no longer want your business. Nigel has also tried to open new accounts but with no luck. /So I thought, well, there we are, I’ll have to go and find a different bank. I’ve been to six, no seven banks actually. Asked them all, could I have a personal and a business account? And the answer has been no in every single case./ He rightly points out that without a bank account you effectively become a non-person, you don’t actually exist. Worryingly, you no longer have the right to a bank account. And without a bank account you are unable to function in a modern society. www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/EVBFMp4JW-s?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0 This is a worrying trend that is happening more and more. It happened with the Canadian truckers and it has been happening on the quiet in the UK. In May, Konstantin Kisin from the Triggernometry podcast announced that their bank account had been shut down with no explanation, despite a healthy balance and transaction history. It seems the banks are increasingly shutting down accounts purely based on political views held by the owners. For now, these are relatively big accounts who can probably find alternative means to survive. But in a short space of time it could easily be you or I who has a bank account shut down. Then how do you pay your mortgage or feed your family? You can’t. The only way is to stick to mainstream views, get your injections and be a good citizen. Self-censoring without anyone even having to tell you to. The only way out of this is Bitcoin. Comment Like Tip icon image You can also reply to this email to leave a comment. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: peckford42.wordpress. Read the full article

[thecpdiary]

Farage, Reform UK Concerns

There is strong opposition to Nigel Farage and his right wing Reform UK Party, suggesting concerns about its impact on British politics.

Journalist Beth Rigby

"WATCH: Thousands gather in Birmingham for Farage. This a Trump-style rally from a politician who is offering disillusioned voters a new political home. But is all the controversy around him & his campaign, beginning to bite? via @BethRigby on Twitter." Sky News. The phrase "be informed, be warned" resonates deeply with me, as I believe that knowledge is power and awareness is key to making informed decisions.

The UK Elections

The UK election is just around the corner. In this tumultuous world, it's easy to feel overwhelmed and powerless. But as you mark your X on that ballot paper, remember that your voice matters. Your vote is a declaration of your values, your beliefs, and your hopes for the future. As you make your way to the polling station, remember this is a chance to shape the course of history; to build a future for you and your family. It's a chance to stand up for what you believe in, even when it's hard. It's a chance to be part of something bigger than yourself.

Nigel Farage: UK Independence Party (UKIP)

Nigel Farage, as leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP), was a prominent figure in the Brexit campaign. The "big red bus" was at the heart of the controversial campaign used by Vote Leave, which Farage was associated with, although he did not directly lead this part of the campaign. The bus claimed the UK sent £350 million a week to the EU, suggesting this money could instead fund the NHS.

Repeal of Human Rights Act

Farage and UKIP argued that the Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, needed to be repealed or amended to prevent excessive interference from European courts.

Immigration

Nigel Farage has been a strong critic of the UK's open-door immigration policy and has argued that it has put pressure on public services, housing, and employment.

He has called for a reduction in immigration to the UK and has advocated for stricter controls on borders.

Farage has also been critical of what he sees as the lack of transparency and accountability in the UK's immigration system.

The Benefits System

Farage believed that the benefits system needed to be reformed to prevent abuse and ensure that only those who truly need support receive it.

Border control

Farage has emphasised the importance of controlling Britain's borders, including introducing a points-based system for non-EU immigration.

Nigel Farage – Personal views:

Farage has been criticised for making comments that have been perceived as xenophobic or racist, including claims that Britain was being overrun by immigrants.

He has also been accused of using divisive rhetoric to appeal to voters.

However, Farage has denied any wrongdoing and maintains that his concerns about immigration are based on economic and social issues rather than racial or ethnic differences.

Reform UK

Origins

After Brexit, Farage rebranded the Brexit Party as Reform UK, which is a private company of which he is a Director and the majority shareholder; although it is registered as a political party.

The company aims to push for reforms in areas like the economy, public services and governance.

Political Position

While Farage has been a polarising figure, labelling Reform UK as a "fascist party" is a significant charge. Farage and his supporters generally argue for national sovereignty and conservative policies, often invoking populist themes. Accusations of fascism typically come from critics who view their stances as authoritarian or extreme. Electoral Impact and Concerns

Potential Influence

Concerns about Farage and Reform UK gaining power center on their policy positions and rhetoric, which critics fear could undermine democratic norms or exacerbate social divisions.

Wider fears about the rise of the far-right

There is a desire to prevent Reform UK from gaining electoral success and influencing UK politics. This sentiment echoes wider fears about the rise of far-right or populist movements globally. Broader Context

UK General Elections

The performance of Reform UK in elections can influence the broader political landscape, especially if they attract significant support or sway policies of major parties like the Conservative Party.

Conclusion

Concerns about Nigel Farage and Reform UK reflect a deep skepticism about their political agenda and potential impact on the UK's democratic and social fabric. The debate over their role in British politics is part of a broader conversation about nationalism, populism and the future direction of the country.

Make 'good choices'

"Make good choices." It's a simple yet profound piece of advice that echoes through my mind as I write about politics. Make good choices for yourself, for your community, for your country. As you head out to vote on July 4th, take a moment to reflect on what matters most to you. What are your core values? What do you stand for? What kind of future do you want to create?

For more relatable, inspirational, lifestyle blogs, please check out my site https://www.thecpdiary.com

[probablyangypolitics]

How the Brexit Party’s existence will play out:

They’ll do well in the Euro elections, succeeding in being elected to a body they don’t like with the sole purpose of making themselves redundant.

Come the next GE they’ll get a lot of votes but’ll be so spread out geographically it won’t amount to any MPs.

They’ll gain 1 or 2 MPs due to Tories defecting.

Brexit will happen with zero involvement from them.

Their polling will shrink as the people who wanted Brexit, now they have Brexit, will migrate back to the Tories.

They’ll fall into obscurity, go through a series of new leaders in quick succession after Farage quits.

Their ex-Tory MPs will defect back or lose their seats at the next general election.

They’ll start appealing more and more the far-right lunatics and their status as a useless joke with no reason to exist will be cemented forever.

How do I know this?

Because we’ve all been through this dog-and-pony show before with UKIP.

[cliveguy]

ughhhhhh i have no idea who to vote for tomorrow 😔