#types of qms

[bmqualitymaster]

Take a deep dive into Different Types of Quality Management Systems with a comprehensive guide. Read this blog to know more:

[wemahesh]

Type of buffer in Hplc

Phosphate buffer Citrate buffer Formate buffer Acetate buffer Tris(hydrixymethyl) -aminomethane Phosphate buffer Pka 2.1 Ph range 1.1 tob3. 1 Pka 7.2 Ph range 6.2 to 8.3 Pk 12.3 Ph range 11.3 to 13.3 Citrate Pka 3.1 Ph range 2.1 to 4.1 Pka 4.7 Ph 3.7 to 5.7 Pka 5.4 Ph range 4.4 to 6.4 Format Pka 3.8 Ph range 2.8 to 4.8 Acetate Pka 4.8 Ph range 3.8 to 5.8

[pixelateddragonet]

I miss my old knight and fantasy themed blog, wish I hadn't purged it with most of my old sideblogs 2 years ago 😔

[quirkwizard]

Spearlike Bones/Naval Laser/Overhaul QM? You can choose which two you want to cover together.

Going with "Overhaul" and "Spearlike Bones". Feels seasonal.

New Quirk Name: Boneyard

This Transformation type Quirk allows the user extensive control over their own skeletal structure. The user can cause their bones to rapidly grow and become augmented, becoming as strong as steel and causing them to sprout out around their body. The user can control the size and shape of the bones. This can let them spread out their bones over several meters or make larger appendages they can move around. The user is able to use their own bones or alter them to look like bones of other creatures, like making a ram skull mask. The user can control any bones their body is still in contact with and make them appear alive, such as moving around on a skeletal dinosaur. This gives the user a powerful tool, with the sheer control they have over their bones giving them plenty of options. They can augment themselves with boney weapons and armor, battle enemies with skeletal constructs, deal extensive damage to enemies or surroundings, grow out and command skeletal minions, or simply replace any broken bones they have. Though this only applies to the user's own bones that the user is touching. and using the Quirk can be quite painful for them. Using the Quirk too much will weaken the bones' overall quality and the user's control, making them cruder and brittle.

[maplemonarchy]

I made more drawings from the Wild Life SMP! There are spoilers for the first two sessions so continue at your own risk. If you want to listen to me yammer about the drawings, you can watch a video where I talk about it here: https://youtu.be/D8hPSv87-QM

These are my designs for the Sub One Club aka the Floaters, aka the Spanners. I had a lot of fun with these drawings.

With Grian's design, I based it off of Toon Link as a double reference to Grian's Link skin and the premise of Minish Cap. The little fairy that follows him around represents the Watchers, hence the purple and the little eye on it.

For Mumbo's design, I loosely based it off the Tinker fairies from the Disney Fairies movies. The thing Mumbo is looking through at the bottom is a microscope that's turned the other direction.

Skizz's design was basically making him look kinda like an athletic angel type, trading the Halo for a Headband. I also took elements from the Tinker fairies for Skizz in the way that he wears the leaf as a vest.

I'm so excited to see where things go from here.

If you have any questions, you can feel free to ask!

[hero-hoe]

Hello loves! Here's a little about me before you go and scroll. ♡

First and foremost: MINORS DO NOT INTERACT. My blog and content is strictly for those 18 and older and if you are underage, you should leave. Anyone found to be interacting while underage will be blocked immediately.

With that out of the way, hello loves, you can go ahead and call me Hoe, and I write over on Ao3 and post occasional drabbles here. This blog is reblog heavy because I honestly consume more than I write most days. My works are almost exclusively poly fics with plus sized feminine readers / OCs because that's a dynamic and character type I enjoy reading the most. I'm nonbinary and often only write when I'm in a more feminine mood.

In addition, I live a hectic life and suffer from multiple mental and physical health issues that make writing take a backseat a lot of times. This does not mean I'm abandoning wips or don't have any updates planned, but it's not a priority for me. I have no upload schedule because of this. When a chapter is done, I post it right away.

My most active fics are:

Innumerable Sins and Their Tender Absolution (ISatTA): [Call of Duty] a soulmate!Johnny human/monster poly fic inspired by the wonderful @bluegiragi's Monster au. Features a plus size fem reader from a sheltered background. There is both M/F and M/M in the poly dynamic. Occasional religious themes and and no major warnings other than NSFW.

Treasured Love (TL): [One Piece] an isekai/transmigration fic centered around a fem!OC by the name of Alexia who's Devil Fruit is based off maslow's hierarchy of needs. Major canon divergence with warnings typical of One Piece itself, plus NSFW. Both M/F and M/M. (tagged as /reader for easier visibility, my apologies to anyone here from ao3 who felt tricked.)

Queen, Mother (QM): [Jujutsu Kaisen] coming of age poly fic with a fem!reader who serves as the vessel for Sukuna's wife (fem!OC). Religious themes in the form of worshipping the OC as as ancestral god. Warnings typical of JJK, no NSFW as of this time. M/F only right now.

My less focused works right now are:

Cambion: [My Hero Academia] a college!au harem fic featuring a demon quirked (Y/N) OC. ((I am working on editing that, forgive me, it was my first posted fic)). Largely canon compliant with only an additional NSFW warning. M/F and M/M

Asthenophobia: [Demon Slayer] a modern day pet!au with a fem!oc who has narcolepsy. A very lighthearted farm life fic where OC and Service Demon!Tengen slowly adopt more demons. Eventual poly. No warnings beyond NSFW and the moral questionability of demons as pets. M/F only right now.

[littlegiganticthings]

How to Re-Enable The Quick Messaging System

- Navigate to DefaultUI.ini, found in the Gigantic: Rampage Edition installation directory. \SteamLibrary\steamapps\common\Mission 202\RxGame\Config\DefaultUI.ini

- Open DefaultUI.ini with the text editor of your choice.

- Press Ctrl + F to open the search window within the text editor.

- Type in bCanUseQuickChat, and find the entry that matches.

- Change false to true.

- Save the file.

Quick Chat

For keyboard/mouse, quick chat is used via pressing the associated number key; ex. [1] [4]. The first key is to select the type (conversation, reactions, tactical, or emotes) and the second key is to select the message. As the UI for QMS is no longer visible, here are the options.

In-Game:

Conversation: [1-1] Help! [1-2] Need healing! [1-3] Yes! [1-4] No!

Reactions: [2-1] Thanks! [2-2] Good work! [2-3] No problem! [2-4] Sorry!

Tactical: [3-1] I'm on it! [3-2] Follow me! [3-3] Group up! [3-4] Spread out!

Emotes: [4-1] Taunt. [4-2] Victory. [4-3] Greeting. [4-4] Battle cry.

Post Game: [1-1] That was fun! [1-2] Thanks! [1-3] Let's play another! [1-4] Good game!

Unfortunately, I do not know the controller bindings.

[darkbluekies]

Hello there lovely, was wondering what an ocean liner was and realized it's a ship! It's actually quite interesting and if you were ever in the mood and time for it, you can tell us! no rushing or forces at all! I'm sure most of us would love to hear more about it, learning new things is a great way to expand your knowledge and ships are really interesting but quite complex, I tend to know the sunken ones a lot, mainly because I wondered what happened and it leaves me a certain type of feel? Perhaps it's grief and curiosity. Nevertheless, have an awesome day! Take care of yourself as always. ♡

—🌊

do you have an hour?

I can tell you some of my favorite knowledge about ocean liners (THAT I HAVEN'T SEEN DONE BEFORE, so no Violet Jessop or Titanic theories) until a get a story in progress lmao

— (according to Oceanliner Designs' Youtube video) After WW1, when America and Britain lost ships due to german forces, they were given the Imperator class as compensation, but they were so petty as not to give the blueprints for one of the ships (said that they could buy them for 5 million dollars) so a pair of men measured the ENTIRETY of the ship, inside and outside, millimeter for millimeter. It took 2 years.

— When the german liner Imperator was built, they were so persistant on making it longer than the british liner Aquitania that was also being built at the same time, so they installed a big golden eagle at the bow to make it just a few centimeters longer than Aquitania ... only to realize that Aquitania was never supposed to be longer, so they installed the ugly eagle for no reason

— (this is a rumour, i'm not sure that it is true) but during WW2, a certain german leader who got butthurt over not getting into art school (guess who) said that the one that could sink the Queen Mary would get 250 000 dollars, but no one could catch the Grey Ghost (QM's nickname)

— During WW1, a german ship called Cap Trafalgar wanted to infiltrate Britain, so they disguised themselves as the british ship Carmania ... only to meet Carmania on the way to England and get sunk by the ones they disguised themselves as.

— Britannic sank in 55 minutes, Lusitania sank in 18 minutes and Impress of Ireland sank in just 14 minutes

— The man who plays JJ Astor in the Titanic movie was a survivor of the Wilhelm Gustloff disaster, which is the deadliest sinking in the history with over 9000 deaths in one night. He had trouble filming the water scenes in the movie because it reminded him of the WG disaster.

— There was a ship to be named RMMV Oceanic which never got completed because White Star Line went bankrupt, which original designs looked like an addition to the Olympic class, but with a cruise-styled stern. Here you can see the first design vs the second design

These were some that I could come up with for the moment, but I know that there are so many more! Please let me know if you want to know more lmao

[levandright]

𝐈'𝐋𝐋 𝐁𝐄 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐊 𝐃𝐔𝐎 ! ; extra info

not a chapter but i think this would help some readers who may not know or understand some of the slangs or terms used!

qm or qm's - a shorter way to say quick match(the standard/normal game mode of idv)

duo or duo's - a game mode in idv wherein compared to 4v1 it's 8v2 instead

tier - what the ranks are called in idv (ex. im griffin tier)

speaking of tiers the highest to lowest goes from titan (VIII) > champion (VII) > alicorn (VI) > griffin (V) > mammoth (IV) > elk (III)> hound (II)>worker bee (I) for the survivors

hunter tiers from highest to lowest are hydra (VIII) > evil dragon (VII) > cyclops (VI) > manticore (V) > sabertooth (IV) > crocodile (III) > cobra (II) > tarantula (I)

terrorshock/ts - when a survivor gets downed while interacting with a pallet/window/cipher or when a survivor is healing their teammate

fragments - a type of currency used to purchase shop skins or items

clues - another type of currency used to buy furniture or unlock new characters

echoes - the premium currency of the game

+ and more will be added as new terms are used/introduced!

masterlist

taglist. @honeychocos @who-tf-soddhi @wonsboo

[bmqualitymaster]

Quality management system is one of the best investments you can make in delivering quality products and services and quality outcomes for your organization. Six Sigma, lean practices, HACCP, GMP, TQMS , ISO 9001 etc. Are some types of quality management systems that help in achieving the same. Know about it in detail through this blog

[cdmagic1408]

Hey peeps, Quest Masters, followers, and all!

I know I've been gone for like...a YEAR. Life's been super crazy, you have NO idea. But not gonna get into all that. Just gonna say I’ve been good, been healing, then really good, happy, and off social media (it’s never really been my thing, so…) 😄

But I promise you I'm not dead! Rather, I've come back from the dead to say that I looked at today's date and just so happened to realize— OMG! It has been exactly three years since I published the first chapter of my Onward fan-novel, If You Trust Me! Wow!

I have found myself in other fandoms as an observer in this last year (maybe I’ll share what they are someday, but not yet), but first, I just wanna say that Onward is still my favorite Pixar film AND my favorite film ever, that hasn’t changed. I still think about it everyday and love it very much. But yeah, I have moved on to other things these days…

Second, and most importantly— I have decided that today, on the anniversary of IYTM’s publishing phase, I wanted to make a very teeny tiny adjustment to its title…

I have always called it, If You Trust Me - An Onward Fanfiction. But in the now-three years since I first shared this story with you all, I’ve come to realize that it really is much more than just a fanfiction—it’s a fan-NOVEL. 33 chapters, plus a prologue and a mid-credits scene. A year and a half to write. A story I wanted to make as authentic as possible to the world of Onward we know and love. It is no mere fanfic.

That said, I hereby rename the long title of this story to If You Trust Me - An Onward Fan-Novel! And to my fellow QMs, if any of you are still out there and reading this, I have you all to thank for it. You guys were the first to really call it a "fan-novel" in the first place, and now in official type, it IS a fan-novel! I know we’ve all kinda moved on and everything, but seeing as it's been a while, I just wanna take the time to thank you all for being there for me in the Onward era of my life. You know who you are. Whenever I look back on all the times we had together, I think of only the good times. There were many good, if not great, things we did and accomplished together as a fellowship and I'll never forget that. As rough as life is and as strange as this world is and will continue to be, I can confidently say now that after taking some time, I only see the good in what we experienced in the end ❤️‍🔥

Lastly, there really aren’t enough words or thanks I can give to show how grateful I am of this fan-novel. Writing it, publishing it, having it read, shared, liked, and all that. I haven’t forgotten about that either.

I am still very proud of this story, and always will be. It helped me grow as a writer, and it was something I wanted to do for myself and for all Quest Masters/Onward fans out there. So to put it simply, thank you. And if there’s anyone who hasn’t read it yet and would like to, by all means! Trust me (no pun intended) when I say that it is a LOT better than all of the incest fics combined. If You Trust Me is a story for anyone who absolutely loves the world of Onward and is looking for something that totally feels like it! ✨

I guess the very last thing I’ll say is, I am well aware that this coming March, Onward will be turning 5 (AHHHHHH! I was Barley’s age (19) when this first came out, whaaaaaaaaaaat) and since that is a big year, I might want to do something special for that. I’m not sure what it will be yet, but I believe I could do something. A long in-hindsight written reflection perhaps? Or an ensemble cast drawing? Both? I haven’t decided yet.

But yeah, that’s it from me for now. I am not planning on posting anything more later, tomorrow, or anytime soon. This isn’t an “I’m back and here to stay” post necessarily. More like a “hello, it’s been a while, but I’m doing well and I just wanted to let you all know that, plus it's an anniversary” post 😊 That’s all folks!

[thebardostate]

What Does Quantum Physics Imply About Consciousness?

In recent years much has been written about whether quantum mechanics (QM) does or does not imply that consciousness is fundamental to the cosmos. This is a problem that physicists have hotly debated since the earliest days of QM a century ago. It is extremely controversial; highly educated and famous physicists can't even agree on how to define the problem.

I have a degree in astrophysics and did some graduate level work in QM before switching to computer science; my Ph.D. addressed topics in cognitive science. So I'm going to give it a go to present an accessible and non-mathematical summary of the problem, hewing to as neutral a POV as I can manage. Due to the complexity of this subject I'm going to present it in three parts, with this being Part 1.

What is Quantum Mechanics?

First, a little background on QM. In science there are different types of theories. Some explain how phenomena work without predicting outcomes (e.g., Darwin's Theory of Evolution). Some predict outcomes without explaining how they work (e.g., Newton's Law of Gravity.)

QM is a purely predictive theory. It uses something called the wave function to predict the behavior of elementary particles such as electrons, photons, and so forth. The wave function expresses the probabilities of various outcomes, such as the likelihood that a photon will be recorded by a detection instrument. Before the physicist takes a measurement the wave function expresses what could happen; once the measurement is taken, it's no longer a question of probabilities because the event has happened (or not). The instrument recorded it. In QM this is called wave function collapse.

The Measurement Problem

When a wave function collapses, what does that mean in real terms? What does it imply about our familiar macroscopic world, and why do people keep saying it holds important implications for consciousness?

In QM this is called the Measurement Problem, first introduced in 1927 by physicist Werner Heisenberg as part of his famous Uncertainty Principle, and further developed by mathematician John Von Neumann in 1932. Heisenberg didn't attempt to explain what wave function collapse means in real terms; since QM is purely predictive, we're still not entirely sure what implications it may hold for the world we are familiar with. But one thing is certain: the predictions that QM makes are astonishingly accurate.

We just don't understand why they are so accurate. QM is undoubtedly telling us "something extremely important" about the structure of reality, we just don't know what that "something" is.

Interpretations of QM

But that hasn't stopped physicists from trying. There have been numerous attempts to interpret what implications QM might hold for the cosmos, or whether the wave function collapses at all. Some of these involve consciousness in some way; others do not.

Wave function collapse is required in these interpretations of QM:

The Copenhagen Interpretation (most commonly taught in physics programs)

Collective Collapse interpretations

The Transactional Interpretation

The Von Neumann-Wigner Interpretation

It is not required in these interpretations:

The Consistent Histories interpretation

The Bohm Interpretation

The Many Worlds Interpretation

Quantum Superdeterminism

The Ensemble Interpretation

The Relational Interpretation

This is not meant to be an exhaustive list, there are a boatload of other interpretations (e.g. Quantum Bayesianism). None of them should be taken as definitive since most of them are not falsifiable except via internal contradiction.

Big names in physics have lined up behind several of these (Steven Hawking was an advocate of the Many Worlds Interpretation, for instance) but that shouldn't be taken as anything more than a matter of personal philosophical preference. Ditto with statements of the form "most physicists agree with interpretation X" which has the same truth status as "most physicists prefer the color blue." These interpretations are philosophical in nature, and the debates will never end. As physicist M. David Mermin once observed: "New interpretations appear every year. None ever disappear."

What About Consciousness?

I began this post by noting that QM has become a major battlefield for discussions of the nature of consciousness (I'll have more to say about this in Part 2.) But linkages between QM and consciousness are certainly not new. In fact they have been raging since the wave function was introduced. Erwin Schrodinger said -

And Werner Heisenberg said -

In Part 2 I will look deeper at the connections between QM and consciousness with a review of philosopher Thomas Nagel's 2012 book Mind and Cosmos. In Part 3 I will take a look at how recent research into Near-Death Experiences and Terminal Lucidity hold unexpected implications for understanding consciousness.

(Image source: @linusquotes)

[oliviabutsmart]

Physics Friday #15 [DWQ]: Multiverse theories

Preamble: What is DWQ?

This is another mini-series that will be ongoing. Similar to opinion posts, there is another type of post that I want to explore.

DWQ - Dealing with Quacks (alternatively, Crackpots or Nuts)

Both crackpots and quacks are unified by what they do. They propose there is something "fundamentally wrong with physics" and that they have this new theory that will change everything.

Their theory is about some fundamental truth with the universe. That the "physics establishment" is constantly attempting to chase ridiculous theories because they don't want to accept reality.

A crackpot is someone who generally has expertise in physics, or a related field like chemistry or engineering. Often they are motivated by a desire for fame.

A quack is someone who has no experience in the field, often with a monetary interest in what they are selling.

"Nuts", which is short for "religious nuts" are those who promote their ideas out of faith and a desire to spread their beliefs. They are more likely to strawman existing ideas first.

I hope that you, the reader, can already understand why I don't like these people. They muddy the waters, mess around with science communication, and give the profession a bad rep. They also lie and pedal disinformation, which ends up acting as a gateway to more serious conspiracy theories within the medical or political realm.

It's also important to identify that this acts on a scale. Technically, some string theorists are a lite form of crackpot - particularly in the way they present their theories and ideas to the public.

But they are significantly more respectable than a flat-earther, or a self-help guru, or a evangelical apologist.

The Multitude of Multiverse theories, or the MultiMultiverse

Multiverse theor(ies) are usually strawmans made by religious fanatics. Think PragerU as a great example.

The argument goes like this:

Scientists have no empirical explanation for fine tuning or the reason for the existence of the universe

In order to explain it, they constructed multiverse theory to explain the source of it

By occam's razor, the simpler argument is the existence of a creator entity, that fine-tuned things for us

Of course you can see how bad the arguments are. The problem is of course that science hasn't accepted any multiverse theory.

Multiverse theories are neat explanations or consequences of other theories, but they are either limited in their explanatory power, or their efficacy to test.

But what are the multiple multiverse theories? Here's three that people claim are multiverse theories:

Many worlds interpretation (a QM thing, and only a multiverse theory in pop culture)

Inflation multiverse theory (one possible consequence of the cosmic inflation hypothesis)

Just an actual multiverse theory (arguable cosmic inflation can lie here)

Many Worlds Interpretation

I've already run through the main gambit of what the Everett interpretation is, so I'm going to tackle this from a pop sci perspective.

When you were younger, you might've heard that the many worlds interpretation literally means many worlds. That with every decision you make, you create a new seperate branching reality. And that multiple realities can simultaneously exist.

Of course, there is an issue with this. Mainly that there aren't multiple realities - there is just one reality, in a superposition of states.

This superposition dictates there is one reality, just that this reality is probabilistic. These realties aren't separated by physical space. It's just one big 'wavefunction'.

Decisions in the many worlds interpretations are also examples of when pop sci goes wrong. It's not necessarily the religious nuts who cause this misconception.

What causes more splits in the wave function is the interactions within it. When an electron collides with a positron, when a chemical in your brain goes from one end to the other. Interaction is what creates these splits.

Technically, decisions are caused by the interactions between electrical signals in our brain, and us making a decision often involves interacting with the world around us. This is how the misconception arises, but the reality is that the split occurs well before and well after a choice is made.

Of course, it's important to state that, the many worlds interpretation is still not the "correct" interpretation. What it posits hasn't been proven.

Inflation Multiverse theory

Inflation theory in itself is already a bit on the rocks in terms of an explanation of why our universe is the way it is. There isn't really any way we can use GR/the standard model to explain why inflation happened. At least, without having to add an extra field or constant in our equations.

Generally, inflation is explained using the addition of a new inflaton field, which in the higher temperatures of the early universe, caused a rapid expansion of spacetime.

This rapid expansion is generated by the field living in a heightened energy state.

At some point, the field reaches a sudden drop-off, at which point the expansion rate suddenly slows down to our expected GR level. The inflaton field then remains at a local minima.

Where does the Multiverse theory come into this?

The drop-off of the inflaton field is not universal. It only occurs at particular points in spacetime. This creates a 'bubble' of space that slowly expands in comparison to the surrounding ocean of space that is rapidly expanding.

We exist in one of these bubbles, which expands at a normal rate. But we aren't the only bubble.

There could be several bubbles surrounding us. All separated by physical space that expands at incredible rates. These bubbles create an effective multiverse.

It's not technically a multiverse because every bubble is still in one single physical universe.

Generally, this version of inflation multiverse theory is better accepted as it has inflation theory to back it up. But it's still not provable, so it's not regarded as truth.

The actual Multiverse theories

There are several multiverse theories. But the key thread linking the other multiverses, is that there is no physical way to traverse the space in-between worlds, and that each universe is seperate in beyond a physical capacity.

I can't go into many different multiverse theories, because the main point is that they're all either bullshit or thought experiments.

One example is the "temporal multiverse theory" which states that time is actually a 3-dimensional quantity, were our multiverses are caused by separations in time.

When you go back in time and alter the past, you end up in an alternate timeline future. This is a common way to interpret most time travel movies or scenarios.

Another is the "10-dimension" theory. There are 3 dimensions of space, 3 dimensions of time, and 3 dimensions of "universe". What is this universe dimension? Well it's effectively supposed to be an altering of the fundamental physical parameters.

The problem is that we don't think that the universe happens to perfectly have three degrees of freedom in it's construction.

The 10th dimension is usually unexplained in this theory.

So what was that fundamentalist strawman about?

There is an idea in physics called "quantum darwinism". This theory basically states that from the many worlds interpretation, there will be one probabilistic reality where human consciousness lives in. And thus that version of reality will be the one we see, as it was fit for human life.

This principle can be extended to various different versions of multiverse theory. That out of the many possible realities, we observe the reality that created the perfect conditions for human life.

This argument, that the universe was predisposed to observation, because it had to circularly, is called the anthropic principle. It can be said that it's an extension of the copernican principle.

And that's it. That's the strawman. Of course, this form of darwinism is not really an actual theory, more a thought experiment.

Conclusion

This post is slightly less long than the other ones but still a lot. Oops! Ruh roh!

Anyways, I hope y'all like this post with a different topic. They will be rarer because I want to take my time tackling these types of posts. Please lmk if you think this post was informative or if you'd like to see more!

Next week will probably be on Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Follow if you wanna see more!

[quirkwizard]

Air Cannon and Air Walk QM is a missed opportunity if you ask me

New Quirk Name: Wind Kick or Air Air

This Emitter type Quirk allows the user to form swirling air around their legs. These allow the user to walk and jump along the air like a solid platform. By moving their legs, the user can send out bursts of air to attack people, more than strong enough to throw someone back. The user has a lot of control over these bursts of air by how they kick, granting them a variety of attacks, such as sweeping their leg to make an arc or pushing their leg forward to make an orb. This gives the user a good mix of offense and mobility, able to jump and kick around with their whirlwind legs. They can jump around their foes, mix up their attacks on the fly, scout out over an area, propel themselves with bursts of air, or just get sand off their legs when they're on the beach. Though the user will need to concentrate on maintaining their air lest they fall. Constantly attacking and shaping their attacks can make it harder to focus on their winds.

[eyencogneyeto-polls]

QM:

Does your typing quirk affect how you talk?

-Yes, all parts of my typing quirk affect how I talk

-Yes, some parts of my typing quirk affect how I talk

-No, none of my typing quirk affects how I talk

-No, but I have a speaking quirk that's not reflected in my typing quirk

[memesandmusicalss]

okay looking at screen is not gelpijg i qm typing my his with my wyws closed i gave a headache im going to sleep bue yuus