#tobacco companies
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
stone-cold-groove · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Can you spot the Camel Filters smoker? Camel cigarettes ad - 1973.
7 notes · View notes
desimonewayland · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Do you know what a Zynbabwe is? Or an upper-decky lip pillow? OK, here’s an easier one — how about just Zyn?
5 notes · View notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
"SHOW CHANGE NEEDED BY TOBACCO EVIDENCE," Toronto Star. May 15, 1934. Page 2. --- Rouses People to Inequality and Injustice of System, Says Teskey ---- Interrupting the meeting with questions involving international finance, when the speakers continued to discuss national and local questions, a heckler was finally ejected by force at a C.C.F. meeting in Veterans' hall, Mount Dennis, last night. Two ushers hurried from the rear of the hall, grabbed the heckler and rushed him through the swinging doors, and deposited him on the curb.
With rebellion as a drastic alternative, the C.C.F. is Canada's only hope for a governmental system based upon human needs and Christianity truly applied, declared Dr. Luke Teskey, C.C.F. candidate for South York.
"In less than 100 years there have been two rebellions in Canada. We are now face to face with a crisis of the greatest magnitude in the history of Canada," continued Dr. Teskey. "The Canadian people will spring about a change in our social construction and it will either come by evolution or revolution.
"The evidence as given at Ottawa recently by Waller M. Stewart, wealthy tobacco manufacturer, that 'excise favors and been exchanged for campaign contributions to party friends of the present government,'" is well known.
"These facts are of inestimable value in rousing Canadian people to the gross inequalities and injustices of a capitalistic state of society," he declared.
"If the report in the press yesterday of the Saturday night clash at Earlscourt park between C.C.F. speakers and the police wherein the police state that I ordered the driver of the truck we were using as a platform to leave it standing on one of the athletic fields,' is true, then the police are bearing false witness against me," Dr. Teskey charged.
Other speakers included Councillor Arthur Williams of East York and J. W. Buckley, C.C.F. candidate in West York.
0 notes
vintagepromotions · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
'Get the honest taste of a Lucky Strike'
Lucky Strike cigarettes advertisement (1959).
13 notes · View notes
grizzlybearattack · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
19 notes · View notes
cas-gender-slider · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Ok last one, this might be a little obscure but here's some premades as various pics I took while working in a call center, is that relatable?
11 notes · View notes
stephenist · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
[•]
8 notes · View notes
an-aura-about-you · 1 year ago
Text
actually since we're talking about details that imply things that some might have missed in TMA, this has me wondering:
y'all know the dude in the first episode smokes pot, right? the one that rolls his own cigarettes? that is a Pot Smoker Thing to do, even if he does have tobacco in this instance. and I don't mean from extra stuff that implies he does, I mean just from that detail in the episode itself.
7 notes · View notes
caeliflammae · 10 months ago
Text
refusing to buy a new vape bc i dont want to contribute to exploitation in the congo but also still being addicted to vaping leads to me just chiefing on the deadest oldest nastiest vape and wondering why i feel like shit every time i hit it
2 notes · View notes
thediktatortot · 11 months ago
Text
I don't understand how people can actually smoke cigarettes for real.
5 notes · View notes
stone-cold-groove · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Light up a lucky - it’s light-up time! A circa 1956 ad for Lucky Strike cigarettes.
12 notes · View notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
"CLAIM REIGN OF TERROR EXISTS IN TOBACCO TRADE," Toronto Star. May 16, 1934. Page 9. ---- Retailers Afraid to Display Any But Imperial's Pro- ducts, Inquiry Told ---- SAYS THREATS MADE --- Special to The Star Ottawa, May 15. - H. C. Fortier, Montreal tobacco wholesaler, appearing before the tobacco price spreads inquiry, to-day declared he had become so calloused to complaints of Imperial Tobacco's alleged efforts to strangle all other competition that he could not begin to enumerate the various instances.
Quebec retailers were in constant fear of being cut off Imperial's buying list, he said.
Favors Price Maintenance John Hughes, secretary-treasurer of LO. Crothe, Ltd., of Montreal, said his firm was in favor of price maintenance.
His company had passed on to the consumers the lowered excise and sales tax in 1932 but nothing came out of their pockets, he said. Jobbers and retailers absorbed the 37 cents reduction not taken up by the reduced government tax.
Mr. Hughes claimed his 1931 price of 27 cents per pound was the highest paid by any tobacco buyer that year. In 1932, he paid 31 and 27 cents per pound on two purchases.
Witness said he had refused to supply jobbers who cut prices. "Did you ever refuse because the jobber did not belong to the association?"
"No."
"Do you contribute money to the association?" "In one case."
Charges Competition Strangled Mr. Hughes declared he did not like the methods used to strangle competition. "The methods used are so numerous it would take a week to enumerate them. Some salesmen for other manufacturers even go into tobacco shops and, if rivals goods are too prominently displayed, they will pick them up themselves and cart them to the back of the store. The retailer is afraid to say a word for fear of being cut off."
That applied more to cigars than cigarettes, he said. "To whom are you referring "Imperial Tobacco."
"Is that a real complaint?" "Yes. It is the general practice."
"Can you name them?" "Yes, but I ask that their names be withheld. Otherwise I fear for the consequences unless Imperial Tobacco has has a change of heart because of what has come out of this committee."
W. W. Kennedy, Winnipeg, Conservative, asked him to file the names for Investigation by the committee's investigators. "Otherwise we are dealing with fog," he pointed out.
"Nearly Life Death" Mr. Hughes charged "complete discrimination against his cigarettes. He cited the case of a Winnipeg retailer warned by Imperial Tobacco that their goods must have 80 per cent of his advertising space under penalty of losing the privilege of buying direct.
"Eighty per cent, means 100 per cent," he complained.
"I looked in 3 different windows to-day," said E. J. Young Lib.. Weyburn). "Imperial cigarettes dominated most windows dominated but I saw Macdonald's and your cigarettes in others."
Norman Sommerville. K.C. committee counsel: "If the retailer doesn't play with Imperial. It is life or death to him?" "Pretty near." Mr. Hughes said three weeks ago his firm put out a new cigarette in Toronto and put streamers on the streets. A day or so later Imperial plastered the streets with streamers advertising their brands.
"We put up more streamers to counteract this," he said. "To-day I received a wire from our Toronto manager telling me that almost all our streamers were taken down, but he could not prove anything."
Witness cited several instances of alleged threats by Imperial salesmen the tobacconist did not remove the showcases of rival firms. "This one funny," he observed. "This complaint does not affect our goods. It says the salesmen warned the retailer that he would have trouble buying direct unless he took Benson-Hedges cigar showcase off his counter."
Mr. Hughes declared the complaints widespread that the believed orders to salesmen must come direct from Imperial Tobacco head- quarters
"Have you any actual personal experience of this practice?" "No, but one retailer was ordered to produce for Imperial a record of all other brands he sold that month. He had ordered goods three or four days delivery delivery was held up.. He told us the Imperial salesman coming back the next day so we sent down some men to hide in the next room and listen to the conversation. The salesman told the retailer he was ashamed to do this but he had orders from head office. If the records were not forthcoming. the retailer could no longer buy direct from Imperial. Our men came out. The salesman saw he was trapped and the retailer got his supplies that afternoon."
Claims Signs Torn Down Only last week the signs advertising a new cigar his firm was making in Hull were torn down. Mr. Hughes said. "Who did this?" he was asked. "Imperial," he replied.
"Who says so?" "Our manager. He would not say so unless he had pretty definite evidence."
Major Kennedy: "It's a big fish eating the case of the little fish. That has gone on ever since there were fish."
Mr. Hughes: "Maybe we were fish to go into this but, now we are in, we will fight."
"But sometimes the little fish escape?" "The smaller they are, the better chance of escape they have."
All manufacturers could afford to the grower more for his tobacco were not for the premiums in packets of cigarettes, he said. "Who started this practice premiums? asked Sam Factor.
Mr. Sommerville: "Cards in cigarettes are as old as you or I. I remember when we used to get pictures of Delilah Fox, Lily Langtry and other famous actresses. They were to look at, though."
Claims Initiative Stultified Defining the practices which he said militated against free exercise of business Initiative, H. Fortier, prominent Montreal jobber distributing for Macdonald's, said: "We have found we would put up a British Consols sign and an Imperial man would come along and tell us he could sell us no longer direct. We arranged to distribute Macdonald's tobacco the Montreal unemployed. A few days later the retailer who distributed to the jobless was told he could no longer buy direct from Imperial."
A. C. Picard, vice-president of the Rock City Tobacco Co., at Leamington, makers of Spud and Master Mason cigarettes, said the retailer to-day was in "dangerously poor" condition "Every one of them will be out of business business in in a few years, years," he predicted. The retailer's share of the $75.000.000 Canada spends in smokes every year was $12,000,000, he said. This, divided among 57,000 retailers, is an average of $260, or $1 a week.
"The retailer should get 20 per cent. and the jobber 10 per cent. That's how it was until ten years ago, he said.
He often thought the heads of Imperial did not know the lengths to which their salesmen went to get business, he said. "They drive their men, who get so nervous and excitable they upset everything in their scramble for business. Imperial has 133 salesmen going around the country with 100 advertisers following them to check up on them.
"They are to keep on putting the fear of God into the heart of the retailer," he claimed. "The salesmen are frightened of losing their jobs if they don't seem to have firm enough hold on the retailers."
0 notes
timeisacephalopod · 2 years ago
Text
The fact that cigarette companies exist is fucking dystopian and a sign of the failure of capitalism as an ideology- cigarettes are a product that undeniably caused a bunch of different cancers, we've all seen the tobacco death stats on the back of cig cartons smokers have, and yet. And yet, for some reason instead of saying "zero businesses should be selling cancer causing products to their customers, certainly not when those cancer causing products are so dangerous even the smoke of the product causes cancers in the people around smokers. Businesses have zero right to cause a massive health crisis in the population like this when their only function is to make money- you cannot give people cancer for profit."
Like you'd assume giving people cancer for money would be some kind of fucked dystopian novel that'd get ripped on for being way too over the top and unrealistic but no, we literally live in such a morally bankrupt capitalist brain rotted society that we think selling cancer is fine, we won't do anything about a set of companies that exist solely to get customers addicted to their highly dangerous product for profit. Instead we'll act like it's smokers who need to take responsibility for the industry that's exploiting them. Fucking disgusting if you ask me, that we're more okay with companies giving people cancer than we are with governments giving people welfare.
#winters ramblings#my parents have been smokers for as far back as i remember#id really like to livht some ceos on fire for putting all these people at risk OF CANCER and like 72 billion kinds#so they can make MONEY. what kind of morally vacuous black hole of a person thinks thats acceptable??#and they LOBBIED to hide any effects of smoking second hand effects included. fucking HORRIFYING#the fact that businesses do this a LOT- like bp shell and exxon all covering up climate change to make more money??#capitalism is a failure because people will kill each other or even THE ONLY VIABLE PLANET TO LIVE ON IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM#just to make money. like you can tell me about how horrible other economic systems are all fucking day#and frankly id be inclined to ahree with you on plenty. but capitalism is not a viable choice either#when THIS is the result. selling health crises to the population and killing the planet. name me another economic system thats done THAT#ill fucking wait because capitalism is it. embarrassing that people will defend this system#even more embarrassing that we hand wring over fst people being an epidemic to the point of systemic oppression#because THEY need to take responsibility for the health crisis they allegedly cause despite reporting going to the drs FAR less#than thin people so idk how theyre astrain on health care especially in the us where people literally die before going to emerg but ok#THEY need to be responsible for THEIR health crisis despite losing weight long term being NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE#but tobacco companies can sell cancer to the point if being a WAY MORE SOLVABLE HEALTH CRISIS#but we cant do anything because being disgustingly cruel and punative to individuals is fine but oh dear LORD#how could we EVER treat businesses with more impunity than individuals because they cause INFINITY MORE DAMAGE??#we couldn't POSSIBLY treat a structure of institutional power like it actually HAS power thatd break the illusion its all CONSUMERS faults
9 notes · View notes
pillarboxstudio · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
classicintp · 5 months ago
Text
When I say I redefined the meaning of guffaw
Tumblr media
Light answers a tough question
132K notes · View notes
stephenist · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
[•]
5 notes · View notes