#sylvia scarlett
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
olivethomas 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Katharine Hepburn in Sylvia Scarlett, 1935
204 notes View notes
iveseenitinmovies 11 months ago
Text
save me Katharine Hepburn in drag as Sylvester Scarlett in the film Sylvia Scarlett.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Katharine Hepburn in drag as Sylvester Scarlett in the film Sylvia Scarlett save me
116 notes View notes
thursdaymurderbub 24 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Screenland magazine, January 1936
17 notes View notes
clarulitas 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Clarulitas Katharine Hepburn in Sylvia Scarlett (1935) 2024
19 notes View notes
dianneking 2 years ago
Text
To anyone asking where my gender chaos comes from: I was socialized as female, but these were my role models/fave movies growing up:
Dame Julie Andrews in Victor Victoria - 1982
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Katherine Hepburn in Sylvia Scarlett - 1935
Tumblr media
Also, I am queer AF
109 notes View notes
maudeboggins 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
1936 ad for sylvia scarlett
81 notes View notes
scholarofgloom 21 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
2 notes View notes
tinnycrow 6 months ago
Text
Why she hop around like that?
3 notes View notes
haveyouseenthisromcom 9 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
3 notes View notes
yatanis 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
15 notes View notes
vpervaffanculo 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
8 notes View notes
iveseenitinmovies 4 months ago
Text
Katharine Hepburn jumping fences circa 1933
Tumblr media Tumblr media
15 notes View notes
bornaftermytime 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
Source: fb Classic Movie Digest
Cary Grant and Katharine Hepburn in "Sylvia Scarlett" (1935)
9 notes View notes
cosmicrhetoric 2 years ago
Text
my katharine hepburn phase was so funny i went through most of her discography completely happy with the screwball comedies and whatever the hell stage door was and then i got to sylvia scarlett (1935) like. alright buddy what's all this then
5 notes View notes
byneddiedingo 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Edmund Gwenn, Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, Natalie Paley, and Brian Aherne in Sylvia Scarlett (George Cukor, 1935) Cast: Katharine Hepburn,聽Cary Grant,聽Brian Aherne,聽Edmund Gwenn,聽Dennie Moore,聽Natalie Paley.聽Screenplay: Gladys Unger, John Collier, Mortimer Offner,聽based on a novel by Compton MacKenzie.聽Cinematography: Joseph H. August.聽Art direction: Van Nest Polglase, Sturges Carne.聽Film editing: Jane Loring.聽Music: Roy Webb. Bear with me while I try to remember the plot of Sylvia Scarlett because I'm not entirely sure that I didn't fall asleep and dream it: When the wife of an Englishman living in France dies, he decides to return to England with his daughter. But because he is suspected of having embezzled money from the company for which he is an accountant, he and his daughter decide that she will disguise herself as a boy because the authorities will be looking for a man traveling with a girl. So on the boat crossing the Channel, they meet a cheerful Cockney con-man, to whom the other Englishman confesses that he's smuggling a bolt of fine lace through customs. But when they arrive in England, the Cockney points them out to the officials and the Englishman and his daughter-disguised-as-a-boy are detained and fined and the lace is confiscated. Then on the train to London, they coincidentally find themselves in the same compartment as the Cockney, who not only repays the fine but even gives the Englishman a little extra money, while also revealing that he's a smuggler with diamonds concealed in the heel of his shoe, and that he turned them in to divert attention from himself. All is square, except that now the Cockney proposes that they team up and run a few cons together. They're not very good at it, so when the Cockney reads an article saying that a rich couple are taking an extended holiday out of the country, he decides that they should rob the deserted house. The plan is thwarted by the maid the couple has left behind, so they persuade her to go on the road with them as traveling entertainers. They hire a wagon and go to Cornwall and give a show that attracts the attention of a rich young artist and his Russian girlfriend. The artist tells the son/daughter that he wants to paint him/her, but he/she swipes a dress and a hat that were left behind on the beach by a woman who has gone swimming and shows up at his studio as a woman, but the Russian girlfriend is outraged to find her there. Meanwhile, the Englishman has taken to drink and fallen in love with the maid and one night wanders out drunkenly in the fog and falls to his death from a cliff. After his funeral, the daughter and the Cockney return to their wagon (the maid has somehow disappeared for good), but they hear a cry for help from the Russian, who has apparently attempted suicide because the artist doesn't love her anymore, so the daughter plunges into the ocean and rescues her, returning her to the artist. Then the Cockney and the Russian decide to run away together, so the daughter and the artist pursue them, winding up on a train and somehow realizing that they're in love with each other. Now, to the point: Why in hell did anyone ever think this made enough sense to film? Or that the completed film would please critics and attract audiences? (It didn't.) But the truth is, it's not unwatchable, and sometimes, if you're in the mood for the utterly bizarre, it's sort of fun to watch, mainly because the Cockney is played by Cary Grant and the son-daughter by Katharine Hepburn, in their first on-screen teaming.* And perhaps because Edmund Gwenn as the Englishman is as charming as ever. And also perhaps because George Cukor is one of the few directors of the period who could leaven this lump of Edwardian nonsense: It's based on a novel by Compton MacKenzie, a now-forgotten writer with a taste for whimsy and a tolerance for sexual ambiguity. The screenplay was mostly written by John Collier, another writer with a decidedly eccentric view of the world, with the help of Gladys Unger and Mortimer Offner. Naturally, the Production Code weighs heavily on the ambiguous sexuality of the film, though we are never really quite sure whether the artist played by Brian Aherne is more attracted to Sylvia than to Sylvester. (Hepburn is quite beautiful as either.) But mostly the film gives us a chance to see Grant before Archibald Leach, the product of a troubled working-class family, completely became "Cary Grant," the embodiment of sophistication: There's a darkly threatening sexuality to his character, Jimmy Monkley, that's compelling and makes us wonder why Hepburn's Sylvia should prefer Aherne's much softer Michael Fane. Sylvia Scarlett has a cult following today that it doesn't entirely deserve, but it remains a fascinatingly mad mess. *They went on to make two more films for George Cukor, Holiday (1938) and The Philadelphia Story (1940), but their most memorable work together was for Howard Hawks on Bringing Up Baby (1938).
6 notes View notes
emmieexplores2 1 month ago
Photo
1935
Tumblr media
Katharine Hepburn on the set of Sylvia Scarlett (1935, dir.聽George Cukor) (via)
3K notes View notes