#sudarium

[cuties-in-codices]

the face of jesus on veronica's veil

15th and 16th century manuscripts illustrations

sources: Munich, BSB, Cgm 8010(2, fol. 68v // Karlsruhe, BLB, Cod. Karlsruhe 439, fol. 1v // Paris, BnF, Latin 1171, fol. 70v // Lausanne, Bibl. cantonale et universitaire, TP 2858, fol. 110v // Munich, BSB, Cgm 7251, fol. 231r // Karlsruhe, BLB, Cod. Donaueschingen 106, fol. 69r // Hermetschwil, Benediktinerinnenkloster, Cod. membr. 35, fol. 73v

[tenebraetuae]

Sudarium

Velo di Santa Veronica.

[theisticles]

[the-casbah-way]

Do you know why does Octavius in the movies have that yellow thing round his neck? is it like an extra layer beneath the armor? I need to know for my fic thanks!

just skimmed some photos of octavius because i forgot what he looks like in canon lmao but if you’re referring to what i think you are then it’s probably a focale :] it’s a scarf worn beneath the cuirass / armour to stop it from chafing the skin

[literaryvein-reblogs]

Word List: Grave

beautiful words with "grave" for your next poem/story

Gravecloth - sudarium, i.e., a linen square carried by the upper classes in Roman times (as for wiping perspiration from the face); handkerchief; an image of the face of Christ painted on a cloth and used as an aid to devotion

Graveclothes - the clothes in which a dead person is buried

Gravedo - archaic: cold in the head

Graveless - not buried; not requiring graves; deathless

Gravelrash - abrasion of the skin by gravel or other rough surface

Gravelroot - marsh milkweed; horse balm

Gravelweed - an American herb (Verbesina helianthoides); bush honeysuckle

Graveolence - obsolete: a strong and offensive smell

Graveside - the area beside a grave

Gravestone - a burial monument

Gravette - a small sharp prehistoric flint tool consisting of a blade like that of a knife with a very sharp point, a straight back, and a groove following one entire margin

Graveward - toward or directed toward the grave

Ingravescence - the state of becoming progressively more severe

Intergrave - to grave or carve between; engrave in alternate parts

Ungrave - to dig up; disinter

If any of these words inspire your writing, do tag me or send me a link. I'd love to read your work!

More: Word Lists

[disease]

“THE SUDARIUM” ANTHONIS SALLAERT – XVII CENTURY [woodcut in black on paper | 37.2 x 27.5 cm.]

[iamfitzwilliamdarcy]

Dic nobis Maria,  quid vidisti in via?

Sepulcrum Christi viventis,  et gloriam vidi resurgentis

Angelicos testes,  sudarium, et vestes.

Surrexit Christus spes mea:  praecedet suos [vos] in Galilaeam.

—-

Tell us, Mary, what did you see on the way?

"I saw the tomb of the living Christ and the glory of his rising,

The angelic witnesses, the shroud, and the clothes."

"Christ my hope is arisen; he will go before his own [you] into Galilee."

[christiancomputerstudent]

The Turin shroud and Leonardo da Vinci

There is a interesting thory that says Leonardo da Vinci made the image on the Shroud of Turin, this thory was published in the book below and on a Channel 5 documentary Turin Shroud: How Da Vinci Fooled History.

TURIN SHROUD: How Leonardo da Vinci Fooled History COMPLETELY REVISED AND UPDATED

By the authors of The Templar Revelation Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince

OK let's say leonado did do it, how did he do it, baring in mind there is no paint or other pigments on the cloth and other methods were not available in the medieval period or leonados's day, also what ever made the image, created a negative, 3d imagee this only stained the fist layer of material on the cloth.

So far, the Turin shroud has been dated to two dates so far. The first date was medieval, and the second dated it to the 1st century.

Other tests done on the cloth have shown that the cloth is consistent with 1st century weaving techniques.

The mystery of how the turin shroud was made brings up an interesting fact, someone once offered lots of money to anyone who could solve the mystery of how it was made so far no one has ever come forward with a plausible method, to say how the shroud was made, and no one has ever come up with a plausible method of how the shroud was made so if you can think of a way the shroud was made you could be getting a llot of money.

The shroud is also well documented, including the fact that it was in a fire, and you can clearly see burn marks running down the sides of the shroud.

Also, the theory that Leonardo da Vinci may have made the shroud can not be tested as there is no evidence that Leonardo da Vinci did create the Shroud of Turin even, though he could if he wanted to as he was a genius, but he didn't, if he did, he would have written the fact in his journal which he wrote everything he did in, plus he had nothing to fear in doing so as no one could read it until now as he used a type of code in the form of mirror writing.

Plus, if we go on the first date, which was obtained through carbon dating, the results indicated that it was made in the Middle Ages, between 1260 and 1390 (on a side note these results have now been challenged as we now have a result of 1st century)

The earliest known record of the shroud is on a commemorative medallion from the mid-14th century, long before leonado was born.

The idea that da Vinci created the shroud was popularized by the 2009 Channel 5 documentary Turin Shroud: How Da Vinci Fooled History, the documentary claimed that da Vinci used a camera obscura and a sculpture of his own head to project his face onto the shroud. However, other researchers have dismissed the documentary's findings. as i said already, this theory can not be tested, and it is not a mainstream academic view, as it goes into a more fringe and psudo history type of area,

Also, the shroud is not just an image of a face it is an image of a whole body front and back showing the perfect anatomy of the human body, of course, this may back up the views of the authors who say leonado da Vinci did it as he was a master of anatomy of the human body on the other hand they mentioned that leonado da Vinci used only a head sculpture to make the image Implying that the authors of book marking these claims that leonado da Vinci made the shroud are unaware that the shroud shows the whole body.

This brings up the idea that the authors know nothing about the subject they are debunking. otherwise, they would know what the shroud looks like.

Interestingly enough, there is another shroud called the Veil of Veronica, or the Sudarium that just shows the face of Jesus, but this is not the turin shroud and should not be confused with it

When Jesus's was. buried they may have used two different shrouds, the Veil of Veronica which maybe just went over rhe face and the Turin shroud which went over the whole body so what ever made the image on the turin shroud may have went through another shroud that covered the face to get there, this may have been the Veil of Veronica, or the Sudarium I don't know.

This probably accounts for the confusion in shroud accounts because people think the two. Shrouds already mentioned are the sane shroud and think there is an error or inconsistency in the accounts of the shroud, but really, they are just talking about two different shrouds.

To add to the confusion there is also something called the Sudarium of Oviedo, which does not have a image on it but again this is not the turin shroud and should not be confused as the turin shroud,

(At this point, I am not sure which face shroud they used, but I do know that either of them are the turin shroud).

The earliest historical records of the shroud place it in Lirey, France, 1350s. A French knight named Geoffroi de Charny is said to have presented the shroud to the dean of the church in Lirey as Jesus' burial shroud. As I have said before, the shroud is well documented

Also, as i haave already mentioned we now have a new result that says the shroud dates back to the 1st century, probably due to an error in dating the shroud, the first time as they probably dated medieval contamination or a medieval repair not the shroud itself.

Conclusion

The theory that Leonardo da Vinci made the shroud is fake news and should not be taken seriously, also judging by their other book. The authors of this book that started this theory should not be taken seriously either, as The Templar Revelation is the book that the Dan Brown's the da Vinci code is based on. Both the da Vinci code and the Templar Revelation books are based on fringe theory, otherwise known as psudo historical views, which mainstream historians and academics have rejected and debunked many times.

More on the subject.

The Turin shroud and Leonardo da Vinci

Turin shroud analysis:

Jesus from academic and historical points of view

Jesus and the Turin shroud

Other References:

The Templar Revelation - Wikipedia

Lynn Picknett - Wikipedia

Sudarium of Oviedo -Wikipedia

Veil of Veronica - Wikipedia

Shroud of Turin - Wikipedia

Leonardo da Vinci - Wikipedia

TURIN SHROUD: How Leonardo da Vinci Fooled History

[apesoformythoughts]

“Not only was there the shroud, intact and collapsed flatter than a cheese soufflé. There was also the face-cloth, set aside. Some exegetes read this verse to mean that the sudarium, or sweat-cloth, that covered the Holy Face was not folded and set aside, outside the strips of cloth, but that it remained inside the shroud, at face level. It seems to me that this interpretation, like some very lofty symbolic interpretations, serves to provide an excellent excuse for not helping with the household chores. It leaves us at the wondrous disappearance, without thinking of what is even still more woundrous, namely, that the first thing the Risen Lord did was to fold and carefully arrange his face-cloth like a napkin after dinner […]

You will probably say that I'm exaggerating. Some want everything to amount to the coarseness of grand spectacle, or a demonstration of power. This is because they probably have not advanced far enough into the mysticism of housekeeping. For what is more in the image of God, along the lines that we have just seen, than keeping house? I will sweep away the house of Jeroboam, as a man sweeps away dung until it is all gone, says the Lord through the mouth of the prophet Ahijah (1 Kgs 14:10). And Jesus clears his threshing floor (cf. Mt 3:12), drives the merchants out of the Temple, and washes the feet of his disciples.”

— Fabrice Hadjadj: The Resurrection [Résurrection, mode d’emploi; transl. Michael J. Miller]

[apokrify]

Albrecht Dürer, Sudarium Held by One Angel, 1516.

[rabbitcruiser]

Oviedo, Spain (No. 6)

The following is a list of the notable architectural sites in Oviedo:

Cathedral of San Salvador, was erected in 1388 over the previous cathedral, which was founded in the 8th century. The original church was built by Fruela I the Cruel (757), and then built upon by Alfonso II (791-842). The Tower on the south side of the church was erected in 1556. The north tower was never completed.

Cámara Santa de Oviedo. Dating from 802. It is located within the Cathedral, attached to the southern transept of the cathedral, and it is a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Houses the Arca Santa chest reliquary of the Sudarium of Oviedo. The Cámara Sancta houses many Christian treasures. It contained the great gold and jeweled cross of victory for Alfonso III, which was made for housing a wooden cross used by the first Asturian king, Pelayo. The wooden cross was supposedly used in the Asturian victory at the battle of the Covadonga in 718. The Arca Sancta itself, which is covered with decorated silver plates, was commissioned by Alfonso VI (1072–1109).

Santa María del Naranco Hall, 9th century. A relatively large pavilion, part of a palace complex built for the King Ramiro I.

San Miguel de Lillo (small church), 9th century.

Source: Wikipedia  

[pietroalviti]

Victimae Paschali laudes immolent Christiani

Victimae Paschali laudes immolent Christiani. Agnus redemit oves: Christus innocens Patri reconciliavit peccatores. Mors et vita duello conflixere mirando: dux vitae mortuus, regnat vivus. Dic nobis Maria, Quid vidisti in via? Sepulcrum Christi viventis, et gloriam vidi resurgentis, Angelicos testes, sudarium et vestes. Surrexit Christus spes mea: praecedet suos in Galilaeam. Scimus…

[fuad-ramses-73]

Maria met het sudarium

Hieronymus Wierix

[louismontielt]

A Glitch "Red Sudarium (κόκκινο σάβανο) ~ Ètude I”

This art piece were created for my PhD and based on a Digital and Analog Aesthetic Research on "Artistic Practices, Digital Art in Social Networks and Net Art", some digital techniques used of artistic diversity, such as the re-mixed appropriation of image or video, also work conceived as original data work called creative altered binary code, datamoshing, generative art and glitch art worked in all its forms and expressions; works of art with a strong focus decoding the i-frames of images and videos (also known as key frames and altered or distorted creative binary code) mixed with seductive techniques of Pixelsorting Art; making it seem extremely sensitive and abstract; created exclusively for the virtual gallery on-line.

by ™℗®© Louis M o n t i e l

NFT Crypto Digital Art

Marketplace on qurable.co : Buy, Shell & Explore Digital Assets

https://app.qurable.co/c-louis-montiel

~ FOLLOW ME & SUBSCRIBE ~

Instagram ~ louismontielt

Facebook ~ Louis Montiel

YouTube.com/@louismontiel

Vimeo ~ Louis M o n t i e l

#aicreations #glitchart #glitch #glitché #pixelsorting #glitchartistscollective #aiartist #midjourneyart #digitalglitch #nfts #hyperspektiv #artificialintelligence #aigenerated #dfkt #pixelsorter #midjourney #nftart #glitchartbr #glitcharts #nftartist #aiart #aiartcommunity #aiartwork #nftcommunity #nft #glitchartist #pixelsortingart #nftartists #creativecodeart #glitchportrait

[eli-kittim]

The Cloths of Christ: Holy Relics or Fakes?

Eli Kittim

Don’t be naive. Fakes, forgeries, and frauds are much more prevalent than you might think. Just as the “post-2002” Dead Sea Scrolls are fake, so are many Christian relics. For instance, take the “Titulus Crucis,” a piece of wood. Christian tradition claims that the relic contains a portion of the True Cross. Scientists, however, consider it to be a medieval forgery:

In 2002, the University of Arizona

conducted radiocarbon dating tests on the

artifact, and it was shown to have been

made between 980 and 1146 AD. The

carbon dating results were published in the

peer-reviewed journal Radiocarbon.

— Wiki

The same holds true for many other relics. Yet despite these setbacks, Christian archaeologists continue to make sensational claims that they have found the burning bush, the tomb of Jesus, the house of Peter, the Veil of Veronica (which btw is never mentioned in the canonical Gospels), and the like. They’re doing a great disservice to Christianity by promoting sensationalism and fake news. By advertizing hoaxes, fakes, and forgeries, they’re setting up Christianity to be mocked and ridiculed, and ultimately rejected. Once people realize that these relics are nothing more than fakes, frauds, and forgeries, they would want nothing to do with Christianity. In other words, the veracity of the Christian message is at stake. They’re setting people up to apostatize and deconstruct their faith. This is actually an attack on——not a support of——the Christian faith!

Pious Frauds

The Sudarium of Oviedo cloth——which is believed to be the post-mortem cloth that was wrapped around Jesus’ head, as mentioned in John 20:6–7——has been dated to around 700 AD by radiocarbon dating:

It’s a hoax!

The Manoppello Image of Jesus Christ’s face on a cloth is also a fake:

Most researchers state that, despite fringe

claims of divine origins, the face on the veil

at Manoppello clearly conforms in

appearance to the characteristics of an

artificially-made image and that stylistically

it is similar to images dating to the late

Middle Ages or early Renaissance.

— Wiki

The Shroud of Turin is also a 13th to 14th century hoax:

In 1988, radiocarbon dating by three

different laboratories established that the

shroud's linen material was produced

between the years 1260 and 1390 (to a

95% confidence level). Defenders of the

authenticity of the shroud have questioned

those results, usually on the basis that the

samples tested might have been

contaminated or taken from a medieval

repair to the original fabric. Such fringe

hypotheses have been refuted by carbon-

dating experts and others based on

evidence from the shroud itself, including

the medieval repair hypothesis, the bio-

contamination hypothesis and the carbon

monoxide hypothesis.

— Wiki

However, there was a recent research study on the Shroud of Turin (April 2022) by Dr. Liberato De Caro’s team which used the new “Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering” or WAXS method to determine the age of the shroud. They claim that they found a match with a piece of fabric from c. AD 55-74 from the siege of Masada in Israel. However, it is as yet unknown whether or not the findings are accurate. As far as I know, they have not been independently confirmed or multiply-attested by other laboratories. Dr. De Caro himself noted that his work was simply “evaluated and peer-reviewed by three other independent experts,” including the editor of the journal “Heritage,” which published his findings. But that doesn’t mean that the results were correct, multiply attested, or independently confirmed. It just means that a couple of editors thought that the experiment was worthy of publication. In fact, Dr. Liberato De Caro himself expressed the need for further research, especially “blind” tests to “avoid any possible bias in the data analysis by the authors of the research.” Bottom line, this new study has not yet conclusively refuted the 1988 radiocarbon dating findings by three different laboratories which established that the shroud is a medieval hoax.

As early as 1390, about 35 years after the

Shroud first emerged in France, Pierre

d'Arcis, the Catholic bishop in Troyes, wrote

to Pope Clement VII that the shroud was ‘a

clever sleight of hand’ by someone ‘falsely

declaring this was the actual shroud in

which Jesus was enfolded in the tomb to

attract the multitude so that money might

cunningly be wrung from them.’

— NBC News

The Roman Catholic Church considers the

Shroud to be an icon, not a holy relic.

— NBC News

Now, a new study using modern forensic

techniques suggests the bloodstains on the

shroud are completely unrealistic,

supporting arguments that it is a fake.

— Livescience

‘If you look at the bloodstains as a whole,

just as you would when working at a crime

scene, you realize they contradict each

other,’ Borrini said. ‘That points to the

artificial origin of these stains.’

— Livescience

Enough already with the hoaxes and the

fake news!