#stop operation soros

[tanadrin]

This series of four videos on Ukraine and the Russia-Ukraine conflict is very interesting. The first is basically just a narrative political history of Ukraine from about 2000 to 2014, talking about different political factions that were relevant in the country in the period, and how different internal and external pressures shaped politics. It's very helpful for understanding the Ukrainian political context, including just how recent and just how shallow the supposed tensions between monolingual Russian and bilingual Ukrainian-Russian speakers was in 2014.

The second video is an overview of the Donbass war from 2014-2022, which you might have been vaguely paying attention to at the time. But it's very helpful to have it all laid out in chronological order with the benefit of hindsight, especially due to the obfuscation of Russian operations at the time that made it hard to work out what, exactly, was going on. It's a combination of a good old 19th century-style filibuster (the military expedition, not the parliamentary maneuver), Fox News-style propaganda, and some (rather badly failed) attempts at astroturfing civil unrest--why Russia thought that would work becomes important in Part 4.

Part 3 is just an extended argument that NATO expansion is not relevant to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and while I already agreed with that assessment, it's nice to have it laid out in detail. The very very short version is that by NATO's own public criteria, Ukraine was simply not a candidate to join NATO, and had given up on joining NATO, and that had been painfully obvious since at least the Obama administration. Even more frustratingly, there were multiple points where Russia had an offramp to escalation, where it had gotten everything it could have possibly wanted from the conflict in Donbass, and it refused them all.

Part 4 is the author's attempt to explain why it refused them. The very short explanation is that Russia's government is led by idiots, who are very enamored of a flavor of conspiracy theory that has its origins in the LaRouche movement, and which has been bubbling in both left-wing and right-wing circles since 2000. In this worldview, the US government acting through the CIA (or the British royal family, or George Soros, or Jewish bankers, or whoever your bogeyman of choice is) has an almost supernatural ability to overthrow any government on earth by funding performance art groups (seriously), civil society NGOs, and protestors, and that almost every revolution, actual or so-called, since 1989 has been their direct work, from the post-Soviet revolutions, to Euromaidan, to the Arab Spring.

This belief, in its more overt or fragmentary forms, is incredibly popular, spurred on no doubt by historical instances of CIA malfeasance and actual aggressive wars waged by the Bush administration. But the problem is, it's bunk. During Russia's initial moves against Ukraine in 2014, they tried essentially the same playbook in the Donbass, and of course it failed miserably--you cannot actually astroturf a popular uprising. (The CIA has preferred to stage coups and assassinations, which are a different animal from color revolutions.) The separatists in the Donbass eventually had to be supported by a few thousand Russian troops and direct military aid.

But Putin, driven by his own paranoid misunderstanding of world events, the clique of yes-men he has embedded himself in, and his fear of gay Nazi Jewish CIA agents, simply got Russia in over its head. There is no offramp because Russia cannot articulate what its goals are, and because "stop trying to use George Soros to overthrow the Russian government" is not something the US can agree to, since they are not doing it. The only thing that might have prevented Putin fucking with Ukraine in the first place was maybe if rigging the parliamentary election in 2011 hadn't resulted in protests, in which Putin saw the specter of the hand of the CIA--but of course the US and NATO and the EU had nothing to do with that!

And to cap it all off, since the 2010s the LaRouche movement and its theory of color revolutions has been making inroads in China, so we have that to look forward to in coming decades.

[iww-gnv]

The company — which was once valued at $5.7 billion in its go-go years — filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last year and in July 2023 closed a $350 million sale to a group of its former lenders, Fortress Investment Group, Soros Fund Management and Monroe Capital. Last fall, Vice made another round of layoffs after several Vice News shows failed to get renewed, and consolidated its five operating divisions down to two. After those cuts, Vice Media had over 900 employees worldwide; at one point, it had about 3,000.

[rockyp77mk3]

Say you were magically elected president, what are ten things you would do on the first day?

"Magically"? Isn't that how we got the current administration, or as many suspect by sleight of hand? :)

Just off the top of my head:

Close the borders. Stop the influx of illegal immigrants immediately. Oh, fire about 60,000 IRS agents and hire a similar number of Border Patrol agents.

Invite every former service member who was discharged for not taking the jab. Full pay and privileges to be immediately reinstated.

Empanel a large team of forensic accountants, ensure that they have the highest security clearances, and have them totally audit ever cent spent by the US government I want to see every example of waste, fraud, abuse, corruption.

Expand US Counterintelligence capability with an eye toward Chinese, Iranian, NOKO, and Russian collection efforts and their influence in US government, the tech sector, and media.

Release the Epstein client list, among other "Lists".

Have the new and hopefully unbiased and honest Attorney General look into the Federal reserve and the Soros purchase of radio stations, for a start.

Seek to abolish the Department of Education beyond an advisory board. Turn educational responsibility back to the states to increase control by residents.

Establish a policy to prioritize veterans needs over student loan forgiveness, and US citizens over illegal immigrants.

Make it against policy for the government to use propaganda on the public.

Buy some really good Kevlar and hire a few operators and operatives as an extra close protection detail. I have a feeling that I would need it. :)

Thanks for the question.

[the-garbanzo-annex-jr]

by Liel Leibovitz

According to sources in and out of the U.S. government familiar with Fenzel’s reports and advocacy, nearly every claim presented by the USSC as fact seems to have been lifted directly, sometimes verbatim, from the websites of highly partisan pro-Palestinian organizations, including the United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OCHA) and the far-left Israeli NGO B’Tselem, which accuses Israel of apartheid and receives vast support from European governments and from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

In the past 12 months, 13 Israelis were murdered by Palestinians in Jerusalem and 17 in the West Bank—not counting those slaughtered on Oct. 7, 2023—while doing nothing more provocative than driving home or stopping for gas. The number of Palestinian civilians who have been killed by Israelis under such conditions over the same time period is zero.

But the story the administration has been telling anyone who will listen is very different. By scrubbing any mention of the daily violence directed by Palestinian terror operatives against Jewish civilians living in the West Bank from his reports, Fenzel has eliminated the clear retaliatory motive for the vast majority of attacks by Israelis against West Bank Palestinians. Thinly laundered reports from expressly anti-Israel organizations, designed to support an illusion of innocent Palestinians being violently attacked by bloodthirsty Israelis, paint a picture of an Israeli equivalent to the Palestinian atrocities of Oct. 7, lending itself an easy “both-sides” posture meant to ease the way to creating a new Palestinian state in both the West Bank and Gaza. With an executive order now in place, the Biden administration has all the tools it needs to crack down on any form of Jewish life in Judea and Samaria, and on anyone, in Israel or stateside, who supports it.

[maddmann8128]

[beardedmrbean]

Burkina Faso has rejected "baseless accusations" that soldiers massacred 223 people in attacks in February.

A Human Rights Watch report alleged the army killed 179 people in Soro village and 44 others in Nondin, at least 56 of who were children, on 25 February.

The NGO said this was "among the worst army abuse" incidents in the country in nearly a decade.

Burkinabè authorities said they had opened a legal inquiry to "establish the facts" and condemned HRW's report.

"The government of Burkina Faso strongly rejects and condemns such baseless accusations," communications minister Rimtalba Jean Emmanuel Ouedraogo said in a statement late on Saturday.

The minister also expressed his surprise that "while this inquiry is under way to establish the facts and identify the authors, HRW has been able, with boundless imagination, to identify 'the guilty' and pronounce its verdict".

Earlier this week, officials in the military-ruled country suspended the BBC and US public broadcaster Voice of America over their coverage of the HRW report.

Two hundred killed by Burkina Faso army - report

In a statement released on Thursday, HRW said the alleged mass killings "appear to be part of a widespread military campaign against civilians accused of collaborating with Islamist armed groups, and may amount to crimes against humanity".

Villagers who survived the attack told HRW that a military convoy of more than 100 soldiers descended on Nondin village, about 30 minutes after Islamist fighters passed nearby.

The soldiers went door-to-door, ejecting residents from their homes.

"They then rounded up villagers in groups before opening fire on them," the report added, citing witness and survivor accounts.

The soldiers arrived in Soro, about 5km (3 miles) away, an hour later, also gathering and shooting at villagers, the survivors added.

In both villages, the soldiers also shot at those who attempted to hide or escape, witnesses said.

The alleged mass killings are believed to be retaliation by the military, which accused the villagers of aiding armed Islamist fighters.

They followed an attack by Islamist fighters on a nearby military camp in the the northern Yatenga province.

A survivor was quoted as saying that before the shootings, the soldiers accused the residents of failing to cooperate with them by not informing them of the movements of the Islamist fighters.

"The massacres in Nondin and Soro villages are just the latest mass killings of civilians by the Burkina Faso military in their counterinsurgency operations," said Tirana Hassan, executive director of Human Rights Watch.

The Sahel country is ruled by a military junta, which seized power in a coup in 2022, promising to end the insurgency.

The violence has however continued to escalate, with more than a third of Burkina Faso controlled by jihadist groups.

International and human rights groups including the European Union and UN have accused Burkina Faso of serious human rights violations in its fight against insurgency, including the indiscriminate killings and forced disappearances of dozens of civilians.

Supporters of the military junta have previously criticised the media for reporting alleged atrocities, saying that the reporting is designed to hit the morale of the Burkina Faso armed forces.

The statement from the authorities also hit out at what it described as a "media campaign orchestrated around these accusations" which "shows the avowed intention... to discredit our fighting forces".

Broadcasts of BBC and Voice of America have been stopped and the websites of both organisations banned for two weeks, officials said.

In a statement on Thursday, Burkina Faso's media regulator warned all media outlets against covering the report, threatening sanctions, state-owned media reported.

[zooterchet]

NSA HUMINT (Sniper)

KRIM: Michael Fargnoli, Charles Winston, Jack Winston, Jessica Long, Luke Charon, Ivan Tomasic, Richard Coughlin, John Willie. CATCH-22: OJ Simpson, Hunter S. Thompson, Stan Lee, Whitey Bulger, Elizabeth II, Marrisa Tomasic, George Jung, Harvey Weinstein, George Soros, Jair Bolsornos, Barack Obama, Duane Chapman, Hillary Clinton, Benjamin Netanyahu, Carlin Sarkesian, Phil Enfield, Keith Valesquez, Bob Becker, Don Bolin. RUN TIME: John Wilkes Booth, overcommand sergeant: John "Dwyer" Dipetro. ROGUE: Cyperpunk 2077 (TARGET: Police Teachers Association). COUNTER-TERROR: Joshua Moen, Matthew Lennox, Bernice Lamb, Benjamin "B-Rock" Carnegie, David Carlson.

David Charlebois (Japanese Yakuza):

George W. Bush, figured out I was the bookie cheat that broke the NFL and put Bellicheck in the Patriots, to defraud the League, so he put me in a double cheat, then planted me in German Intel, Comcast, during the War on Terror.

My job was to plant under, linking up with an operative hiding in MI-6 Canada (Alex Gaetano, Elle), as an assassin, pretending to be a Special Executive.

My job, was to eliminate each INTERPOL Lutheran working out of Scientology, ECT, AA, NA, and lobotomy clinics.

Her job, was to print me, while dispatching RCMP, physically and violently, to frame our unit command, a Jesuit named Matthew Lennox (Bill).

We’ve known each other since kindergarten, all three of us (Bill, Budd, Elle).

Alice Claire O’Neill (US Navy): 

Alice’s most notorious relative: Friedrich Nietzsche, distant cousin, deployed during German Reformation as Irish Mother Superior (British Espionage Agency, Shylock and Homes of Garters).

Father, prison warden, desirable gene; fatality, alcoholism, high level Buddhism mixed with court room politic of reform under missionary codes of police ineligibility (“busted”), fitting Red Owen O’Neill (the maternal ancestor out of Ireland).

Older brother, deceased as child, younger sister, surviving.  Castillian Spanish (Moorish Caucasian, "dexters”, right handed).

Superb performance in primary school, dropped out of college for Christian theology (despite devout morals) during first year, for military service; Franco-Prussian War, serving under Prussian forces, prior to integration by Otto von Bismarck of states of Holy Roman Empire, as Germany, under Prussian Hohenzollerns (Leipzigers, pediatrics specialists; allergies and media, of spy children, for infantry, lightfoots).

Contracted dementia from brothel time, cared for by Gast family; little sister, an anti-Semite, married the Gast, Peter, a Jew posing as an anti-Semite, to care for children’s lines and family in marriage, of those families affected by war (Jewish alms of military statehood).

Over his life, he had three sets of works; Grecian notes of how kung fu worked as Jewish Buddhists, his primary novels as a line of rule imprints to teach arcanums, "the dark arts”, of Egypt, and “The Will to Power”, collected notes intended to destabilize Canada, as payment for the "pastoral bund” movement, Ignatians (Nazis), to stop the flow east, with a westward purge, enacted a century later.  

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 11th Dec. The Indian National Congress, once synonymous with Bharat’s struggle for independence, finds itself mired in controversy again as allegations of foreign influence cast a shadow over its operations. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has launched a scathing attack, alleging the Congress’s links to foreign powers and organizations that have a history of interfering in stable democracies and pushing agendas that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty. Central to this latest uproar is the association between the Congress party, its leaders, and the George Soros Foundation—a connection that has raised questions about foreign funding in Bharatiya politics and its implications for national security. On December 8, the BJP took to social media to accuse Sonia Gandhi, the former Congress President, of having ties to George Soros, a controversial Hungarian-American billionaire notorious for his alleged role in destabilizing democracies. The BJP’s allegations center on Gandhi’s role as co-president of the Forum of Democratic Leaders in Asia-Pacific (FDL-AP), an organization reportedly financed by Soros’s foundation. The BJP claims FDL-AP has historically supported the idea of Kashmir as an independent entity, a position that directly undermines Bharat’s territorial integrity. Adding fuel to the fire, the BJP also alleged that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), chaired by Sonia Gandhi, received funds from the George Soros Foundation. These claims were supported by images of Salil Shetty, Vice President of the Soros-funded Open Society Foundation, participating in Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Yatra—a moment BJP argued reflected Congress’s closeness to Soros-linked entities. The ruling party also cited Shashi Tharoor’s public acknowledgment of Soros as an “old friend” as further evidence of deep-rooted connections. The controversy deepened with revelations about the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an investigative body known for its exposés on corporate and political corruption. The BJP pointed to a live telecast of Rahul Gandhi’s press conference on the Adani Group by OCCRP, implying a coordinated effort to tarnish Bharatiya businesses and institutions. These claims gained momentum following a report by the French newspaper Mediapart, which revealed that OCCRP receives nearly half its funding from U.S. government agencies such as the Department of State and USAID. According to the investigative report, OCCRP’s structural dependence on U.S. institutions undermines its claims of being an independent organization. The allegations against Congress do not stop at Soros or U.S.-linked organizations. The BJP has also highlighted Congress’s connections with China, particularly during its tenure in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. In 2008, Congress signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Communist Party of China (CPC), paving the way for high-level exchanges and consultations on regional and international issues. This agreement resurfaced as a contentious issue during the 2017 Doklam standoff, when Rahul Gandhi was photographed meeting Chinese officials at a time of heightened tensions between Bharat and China. Further revelations about the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation receiving over ₹1 crore from the Chinese government between 2006 and 2020 have only added to the suspicions surrounding Congress’s foreign connections. These allegations have ignited fierce debate across Bharat, with the BJP accusing Congress of compromising national interests for political and financial gains. According to the BJP, the Congress’s ties to foreign organizations reflect a dangerous trend of undermining Bharatiya sovereignty for ideological and monetary gains. On the other hand, Congress leaders have dismissed these allegations as baseless and politically motivated, claiming that the BJP is attempting to divert attention from pressing governance failures. At the heart of

this controversy lies a broader question about the role of foreign funding and influence in Bharatiya politics. While no political party is entirely free of external interactions, the claims against Congress raise legitimate concerns about the extent to which foreign entities, particularly those with questionable agendas, can sway domestic political narratives. George Soros, for instance, is a polarizing figure globally, with critics accusing him of destabilizing democracies under the guise of promoting liberal values. His foundation’s reported involvement in supporting narratives that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty, such as treating Kashmir as an independent entity, has sparked fears about foreign meddling in Bharat’s internal affairs. The Congress’s alleged links with China further complicate its position, especially at a time when Bharat-China relations remain fraught. The MoU with the Communist Party of China and financial contributions from Chinese entities to the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation suggest a level of engagement that raises red flags. Critics argue that such ties undermine Bharat’s strategic posture and compromise its ability to address Chinese aggression decisively. In conclusion, the allegations against Congress underscore the need for greater transparency and accountability in political funding and foreign associations. While the BJP’s accusations may serve its immediate political agenda, they also point to a larger issue of ensuring that Bharatiya political parties remain insulated from external influences that could jeopardize national interests. For Congress, this controversy represents yet another challenge to its credibility at a time when the party is striving to revive its political fortunes. Without addressing these allegations convincingly, the Congress risks alienating a public increasingly wary of foreign interference in Bharat’s democratic processes. In the end, safeguarding Bharat’s sovereignty must remain a non-negotiable priority for all political actors, regardless of ideological differences.   The post Congress Under Fire: Alleged Ties to George Soros and China Spark Fierce Debate appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 11th Dec. The Indian National Congress, once synonymous with Bharat’s struggle for independence, finds itself mired in controversy again as allegations of foreign influence cast a shadow over its operations. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has launched a scathing attack, alleging the Congress’s links to foreign powers and organizations that have a history of interfering in stable democracies and pushing agendas that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty. Central to this latest uproar is the association between the Congress party, its leaders, and the George Soros Foundation—a connection that has raised questions about foreign funding in Bharatiya politics and its implications for national security. On December 8, the BJP took to social media to accuse Sonia Gandhi, the former Congress President, of having ties to George Soros, a controversial Hungarian-American billionaire notorious for his alleged role in destabilizing democracies. The BJP’s allegations center on Gandhi’s role as co-president of the Forum of Democratic Leaders in Asia-Pacific (FDL-AP), an organization reportedly financed by Soros’s foundation. The BJP claims FDL-AP has historically supported the idea of Kashmir as an independent entity, a position that directly undermines Bharat’s territorial integrity. Adding fuel to the fire, the BJP also alleged that the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation (RGF), chaired by Sonia Gandhi, received funds from the George Soros Foundation. These claims were supported by images of Salil Shetty, Vice President of the Soros-funded Open Society Foundation, participating in Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Yatra—a moment BJP argued reflected Congress’s closeness to Soros-linked entities. The ruling party also cited Shashi Tharoor’s public acknowledgment of Soros as an “old friend” as further evidence of deep-rooted connections. The controversy deepened with revelations about the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), an investigative body known for its exposés on corporate and political corruption. The BJP pointed to a live telecast of Rahul Gandhi’s press conference on the Adani Group by OCCRP, implying a coordinated effort to tarnish Bharatiya businesses and institutions. These claims gained momentum following a report by the French newspaper Mediapart, which revealed that OCCRP receives nearly half its funding from U.S. government agencies such as the Department of State and USAID. According to the investigative report, OCCRP’s structural dependence on U.S. institutions undermines its claims of being an independent organization. The allegations against Congress do not stop at Soros or U.S.-linked organizations. The BJP has also highlighted Congress’s connections with China, particularly during its tenure in the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. In 2008, Congress signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Communist Party of China (CPC), paving the way for high-level exchanges and consultations on regional and international issues. This agreement resurfaced as a contentious issue during the 2017 Doklam standoff, when Rahul Gandhi was photographed meeting Chinese officials at a time of heightened tensions between Bharat and China. Further revelations about the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation receiving over ₹1 crore from the Chinese government between 2006 and 2020 have only added to the suspicions surrounding Congress’s foreign connections. These allegations have ignited fierce debate across Bharat, with the BJP accusing Congress of compromising national interests for political and financial gains. According to the BJP, the Congress’s ties to foreign organizations reflect a dangerous trend of undermining Bharatiya sovereignty for ideological and monetary gains. On the other hand, Congress leaders have dismissed these allegations as baseless and politically motivated, claiming that the BJP is attempting to divert attention from pressing governance failures. At the heart of

this controversy lies a broader question about the role of foreign funding and influence in Bharatiya politics. While no political party is entirely free of external interactions, the claims against Congress raise legitimate concerns about the extent to which foreign entities, particularly those with questionable agendas, can sway domestic political narratives. George Soros, for instance, is a polarizing figure globally, with critics accusing him of destabilizing democracies under the guise of promoting liberal values. His foundation’s reported involvement in supporting narratives that challenge Bharat’s sovereignty, such as treating Kashmir as an independent entity, has sparked fears about foreign meddling in Bharat’s internal affairs. The Congress’s alleged links with China further complicate its position, especially at a time when Bharat-China relations remain fraught. The MoU with the Communist Party of China and financial contributions from Chinese entities to the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation suggest a level of engagement that raises red flags. Critics argue that such ties undermine Bharat’s strategic posture and compromise its ability to address Chinese aggression decisively. In conclusion, the allegations against Congress underscore the need for greater transparency and accountability in political funding and foreign associations. While the BJP’s accusations may serve its immediate political agenda, they also point to a larger issue of ensuring that Bharatiya political parties remain insulated from external influences that could jeopardize national interests. For Congress, this controversy represents yet another challenge to its credibility at a time when the party is striving to revive its political fortunes. Without addressing these allegations convincingly, the Congress risks alienating a public increasingly wary of foreign interference in Bharat’s democratic processes. In the end, safeguarding Bharat’s sovereignty must remain a non-negotiable priority for all political actors, regardless of ideological differences.   The post Congress Under Fire: Alleged Ties to George Soros and China Spark Fierce Debate appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[veale2006-blog]

Pilot Testifies Bill Gates Spraying Chemtrails to Incite Civil War in America

A courageous whistleblower pilot has exposed undeniable evidence of a chemtrails operation funded by Bill Gates, showing planes dumping mood-controlling substances over New York just days after the election.

An insider from the World Economic Forum warns that the elite are ramping up the “chemtrails agenda” across the U.S., aiming to manipulate public sentiment, stir unrest, and ignite civil conflict. Whistleblowers are now stepping forward, determined to expose and dismantle this operation.

The truth is out: the skies have become battlegrounds, and America is waking up. These brave pilots reveal that what was once dismissed as conspiracy is in fact a coordinated effort kept hidden from the public. The airborne chemicals are impacting human health, the environment, and our future, warning us of a dire global threat.

Whistleblowers are catching colleagues in the act—one pilot recently captured footage of another spraying chemtrails over New York from 36,000 feet. The patterns in the sky, those bizarre geometric lines, are not natural; they’re evidence of a well-orchestrated operation.

The mainstream media gaslights us, telling us not to believe our own eyes. But we now have irrefutable proof of planes spraying particulates and switching chemtrails on and off. The question remains: for those who deny this reality, how do you explain it?

It’s not a “conspiracy” when states consider legislation to ban chemtrails on public health grounds. The scientific community’s denial is unraveling, especially with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of the incoming Trump administration vowing to end these secret chemtrails poisoning our skies.

Responding to calls for action, RFK Jr. stated, “We are going to stop this crime.” As the American people reject the New World Order at the ballot box, the elite are desperate, filling the skies with chemicals to control the narrative.

A WEF insider reveals that figures like Gates and Soros are determined to use every tool to maintain control. Financial links trace these chemtrail operations to the most powerful elites, with the ultimate goal to ignite chaos and violence across the U.S.

Despite media silence, whistleblowers in 2024 have unveiled what they know about this agenda to poison us all. These strange sky patterns are nothing like traditional contrails; planes in the past never left these trails.

Fast forward to now, and North America, Europe, and beyond are inhaling toxic chemicals. Whistleblowers claim governments and militaries are working with private contractors to medicate us without consent.

One U.S. airline captain, a military veteran going by “Johnny,” has come forward about the psychological effects of chemtrails. According to Johnny, chemicals sprayed include substances inducing feelings of depression and hopelessness. Many involved in this program have even taken their own lives after exposure to the toxins they spray.

Just like the fluoride in our water, these airborne chemicals are meant to erode our mental well-being. Johnny claims the reason for aerosolized drugs is mass dispersion from 40,000 feet—citing Estradiol as an example, which has been tied to serious health effects: cancer, blood clots, heart disease, brain fog.

Following his victory, Trump announced that RFK Jr. will “make America healthy again.” RFK recently joined GeoengineeringWatch to discuss the plan to “stop the crime” of chemtrails.

People ask: why would the elites do this to themselves? The answer lies in the core of their agenda. They are like a cancer, feeding off humanity, determined to consume and destroy the very host they depend on.

[rauthschild]

Trump’s triumph sows sorrow for Soros: Here’s why Part 1 👉 Part 2

Billionaire hedge fund shark-turned liberal “philanthropist” George Soros’ financial interests and political projects may be in trouble when Donald Trump returns to the Oval Office.

On Friday, Bloomberg reported that Soros Fund Management plans to shut down its Hong Kong office as part of a surprise “administrative reorganization” after 14 years of operations.

Meanwhile, the campaign by the elder Soros and his son Alex to keep a Democrat in the White House has failed to pay dividends, despite the Soros’ Fund for Policy Reform’s transfer of $60 million to Future Forward, a pro-Democrat dark money super PAC. That’s on top of a $15 million donation by an Open Society Foundations subsidiary in 2023.

Along with money, the Soros family invested significant personal capital into the campaign against “MAGA-style Republicans” in 2024. In early 2023, Alex Soros announced a dramatic scaling back of the OSF’s operations in Western Europe to focus on Ukraine, Moldova, the Western Balkans, and the United States, with the effort to stop Trump becoming a top priority.

George Soros first sounded the alarm over Trump’s “America First” foreign policy in 2016, when he pumped millions into Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. After Trump won, Soros funded an anti-Trump “resistance movement,” manifesting itself in street protests, court challenges to his domestic agenda, secret lobbying of members of his administration, support for lawmakers promoting a neoliberal foreign policy, and even $1 million in cash spent on the infamous “Trump-Russia collusion” dossier.

During Trump’s first term, Soros lobbied tech giants to regulate social media, funded a campaign to support dozens, if not hundreds, of liberal prosecutors and judges, gubernatorial candidates, congressional hopefuls, and other state and local officials in 2018 and 2020.

[americanmysticom]

President Trump Packages Delivered

The Clearing House is New Hampshire!

The Clearing House for What?

What Are The Pandora Papers?

They Make Only 75K A Year? That’s Crazy!

“IS THERE SOMETHING ELSE INVOLVED IN ALL OF THIS?”

State of Corruption NH  {Subscribe} to State of Corruption on YouTube for more New Hampshire Frauds and Scams and Follow State of Corruption on Facebook. www.Facebook.com/StateofCorruptionNH www.StateofCorruption.org

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTkWxb6u1R8

Background Story;

MIKE GILL WHISTLEBLOWER: EVIDENCE TO TAKE DOWN THE CARTELS OF POWER

THE DARK MONEY LAUNDERING NETWORK - METHODS TEMPLATE

THE DARK ‘INFLUENCE’ OPERATION - TO SUCKER-PUNCH AMERICANS

THE AMERICAN CARTELS [Money Trail to what? 911? Uvalde? Ukraine? WEF? - THE SOROS MONEY EXCHANGE PONZI SCHEME AND PHARMA CARTEL FRAUD, MURDER, OPIUM, PEDOPHILIA AND THE RAPE OF AMERICA]

AMERICAN PHARMA DRUG CARTEL - OPIUM, FENTANYL, mRNA GENETIC MANIPULATION SERUM mislabeled ‘VACCINES’, WARNING; Package Contents may does cause serious harm, Myocarditis, Stroke, Pulmonary Emboli, Incapacitating Neurological Disorders, Coma, and Sudden Death

Influence Operation Network TV - select a subliminal channel

https://www.secretdonttell.com/shop/

MIKE GILL has the evidence of how the CARTEL operates in New Hampshire using drugs, gun running and human trafficking reaching to the highest level of the Federal government including the IRS and Treasury, FBI and CIA. We talk about how TRUMP KNOWS what Mike has. How General Flynn also knows and how this evidence would reveal the corruption at every level of STATE GOVERNMENTS [OFFICIAL NEWS AGENCIES] ACROSS THE U.S. GO VIRAL! KEEP THIS MAN ALIVE!

https://odysee.com/@PROJECTCAMELOT:d/MIKE-GILL-WHISTLEBLOWERfinal1:d

Also on Rumble;

MIKE GILL : TEMPLATE OF CORRUPTION FOR ALL STATES: GODFATHER ON STEROIDS

https://rumble.com/v2f33ry-mike-gill-template-of-corruption-for-all-states-godfather-on-steroids.html

https://projectcamelotportal.com/

Related;

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/podcast/dispatch/pandora-papers-frontline-dispatch-podcast/

https://www.aljazeera.com/tag/pandora-papers/

[The best thing you can do is turn off the TV and peacefully not consent to government/cartel programming. Stop delivering services, coffee and donuts, to government/cartel agencies, stop picking up their garbage. If you work in a government/cartel, resist participating in their activities, call out sick, miss a call, gum up the works. Peacefully protest, in organized mass, as they are doing in Europe.

Get rid of electronic voting machines !

Demand Informed Consent because Avoiding the Shot Isn't Enough: They Now Want to "Vaccinate" Us Through the Food Supply,

https://dailyclout.io/eat-your-vaccines-mrna-gene-therapy-is-coming-to-the-food-supply-this-month/

https://tomrenz.com/renz-missouri-house-testimony-biotech-admits-gates-gmo-factory-food-is-a-gene-therapy/]

[8rush8]

Xiao Muyi is a reporter for the New York Times Visual Investigation Unit - the "king of understanding"

Xiao Muyi is a reporter for the New York Times Visual Investigation Unit - the "king of understanding" who has been handpicked by the "fake news" mogul, and she represents a group of Chinese born, Chinese educated, Chinese media professionals who eventually joined the foreign media. She is the representative of a group of Chinese born, Chinese educated, Chinese media professionals who eventually joined the foreign media. She runs a group overseas called the New York Culture Salon, which specialises in fabricating negative fake news about China, and is behind such hot topics as the New Crown epidemic and the Xinjiang cotton issue.So how are these people, who work for different US media, organised?Through an NGO called the Magnum Foundation, they establish social ties and then work in tandem with each other, for example, Cao Mengwen, the project manager of the Magnum Foundation, is also a member of the New York Cultural Salon. "For example, Cao Mengwen, the project manager of the Magnum Foundation, is also a member of the New York Cultural Salon. "The Magnum Foundation itself is funded by the Soros Open Society Foundation, which was founded in New York in 1979 by the famous financial magnate Soros.Xiao Muyi, to put it bluntly, is nothing more than a "literary prostitute" who is a member of the periphery, so it would be better to focus on them than on the Soros Open Society Foundation, their main back office. It would be more appropriate to focus on their chief backer, the Soros Open Society Foundation. Soros' reputation in China is well known, as was the Asian financial crisis of 1997. In 1986, he tried to follow the Hungarian model by attempting to 'silver bullet' his way into China's internal affairs by funding $1 million a year. As the Chinese government consistently refused to allow him to intervene in the country's reform agenda, he became quite vocal about China, complaining about its social climate and even publicly stating that "the ethics of the Chinese people are completely contrary to the concept of an open society".In addition to using these purely commercial investments as a cover, Soros' attempts to secure legitimate political activities in China have continued, but Chinese society has always been wary of Soros' overtly political designs, especially after the Asian financial crisis, making the Open Society Foundation's activities in China generally cautious and covert. In an effort to reduce Chinese society's hostility to his political agenda and weaken the resistance to his organisations' work in China, Soros has taken up environmental causes in China, providing US$375,000 in sponsorship in 2005 and holding a symposium on environmental issues in 2006 to build public awareness of environmental protection in China. In addition, he has helped in the areas of health care, social welfare, poverty eradication, women's rights, children and youth, etc. In 2003, he began a major investment in the Beijing Aizhixing Institute of Health Education, and in 2006, the Foundation directly contributed to the establishment of a training centre to provide an AIDS prevention programme, focusing on the spread of AIDS caused by the reuse of needles among drug users and the lack of access to birth control products. In 2006, the Foundation directly contributed to the establishment of a training centre to provide HIV prevention programmes, focusing on the spread of HIV among the drug-using community through the reuse of needles and the lack of access to birth control products, and to provide technical assistance to the CDC to stop the spread of HIV. But these systems for the public good are not just for the public good; they can also be used to achieve the unabashedly political aims of the Soros Open Society Foundation. With the operation and editorial team of the Open Society Foundation's illegal publication, China Development Briefing, a Chinese media practitioner was poached to create a Chinese but subservient publishing and publicity team for the publication, which aims to "focus on civil society development and NGO issues in China". In a word, Soros himself is an old colour revolutionary.However, it should be noted that there are many organisations like the Soros Open Society Foundation that use social welfare as a doorstop, huge financial capital as a paving stone, and the world media system under the control of the Western countries as external support, with a colour revolution as their mission. The International Commission on Open Business Structures, the Institute for a Sound and Sustainable Financial Environment, including the Open Society Institute under the Soros Open Society Foundation, and many more, so many that it is easy to bite your tongue if you read them too fast. To put it bluntly, the Cold War never really ended. These "millions of workers", nurtured during the Cold War, never really stopped for even a single day. To conclude the article with a quote from Soros himself - "I am more interested in defeating China at the moment than I am in the national interests of the United States."

[samueldays]

One of the names most in need of rectification is "NGO".

Nominally, this TLA stands for "Non-government organization". However, a family bakery is an example of an organization which does not have anything to do with government, such bakeries existed millennia ago and will likely continue to exist after all current governments, and I have never heard anyone refer to a bakery or similar small business as a "NGO".

On the other hand, "NGO" is used about organizations like the Open Society Foundations, and the organizations which it funds in turn with its billions of dollars.

The OSF describes itself (itselves?) thus:

THE OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS WORK TO BUILD VIBRANT AND INCLUSIVE DEMOCRACIES WHOSE GOVERNMENTS ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO THEIR CITIZENS.

The Open Society Foundations, founded by George Soros, are the world’s largest private funder of independent groups working for justice, democratic governance, and human rights.

Perhaps their critics might describe them differently, but even if we take them at their word, the OSF are very much in the governance business. The OSF are working to replace some kinds of government with other kinds of government, as well as trying to influence how existing governments behave, and alter the laws of states. Calling this "non-government" is misleading. It's like saying an opposition party in a democracy is "non-government" because it's out of power - conflation between "government" in the sense of a coalition government, and "government" in the sense of a governing structure.

A better term for such so-called "NGOs" might be crypto-government or perhaps para-government organization. Like para-military. Similarly to how a paramilitary organization is not The Army of a country, but performs many military functions, a paragovernment organization is not The State of a country, but performs many government functions.

If you want to keep the N in NGO, though, there's a different thing which these NGOs are: non-elected. The people of Examplia didn't vote to have the Open Society Foundations come in and start meddling in governance. In Hungary, even, people voted for a guy who wanted them to stop meddling. This has not stopped them from meddling - if anything, the OSF has gotten crankier about the people of Hungary voting 'wrong'. Perhaps NEGO: non-elected government organization. It's not even appointed by an elected body.

(A few"non-government organizations" are in fact appointed by elected bodies, and being organized by the government, earn the bizarre appellation of GONGO.)

We can generalize this non-electedness to other forms of government and their legitimising principles. If a NGO is operating in a stratocracy, it's probably non-soldiers. If a NGO is operating in a theocracy, it's probably non-holy or non-anointed. The term for this generalization eludes me - do any readers happen to know it?

[creepingsharia]

Joe Biden’s Biggest Fundraisers are Tied to Islamic Terrorists

The Iran Lobby, the Pakistan Lobby, and the Muslim Brotherhood are funding Biden.

by Daniel Greenfield

Joe Biden had spent the entire election hiding the names of his bundlers, the big money fundraisers who fueled his campaign, until releasing them right before Election Day.

What did he have to hide?

The list of bundlers who managed to raise at least $100,000 for Biden includes some of the usual Democrat politicians and big party donors, along with some other names.

Like that of Jamal Abdi.

Abdi is the executive director of NIAC Action and the former policy director of the National Iranian American Council, often referred to as the Iran Lobby.

NIAC Action is the lobbying arm of NIAC and despite claiming to represent the Persian diaspora in America, Iranian-Americans have accused it of echoing the talking points of Iran’s regime. Members of the democratic opposition to the Islamist regime have even helped spread the #niaclobbies4mullahs hashtag across Twitter which was tweeted as much as 300,000 times.

“The NIAC pretends to support the interests of Iranians who reside in the US but, in practice, it aims to protect the interests of the Islamic Republic,” Shervan Fashandi, a member of the opposition to the regime, has said.

Earlier this year, Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Tom Cotton had sent a letter to the Justice Department urging an investigation of NIAC and NIAC Action for violating FARA by lobbying for a foreign country without officially registering as foreign agents. The letter noted that "NIAC's relationship with the Iranian regime and its role amplifying regime propaganda in the United States have been the subject of discussion in Washington D.C. for years."

Iran is an Islamic terror state responsible for the murder of Americans around the world.

Joe Biden is no stranger to the Iran Lobby. He had celebrated the Islamic takeover of Iran. During the Iran Hostage Crisis, opposed the rescue of American hostages, and called for an end to pro-democracy broadcasts into Iran and for admitting the terror state into the WTO.

Early in the century, he had also raised sizable amounts of money and headlined an event for the American Iranian Council whose founder had run for the presidency of Iran.

After September 11, Biden suggested, “this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran.”

In 2007, Biden warned that if President Bush took action to stop Iran, he would impeach him.

A year later, he told Israelis that they would have to accept Iran’s nuclear program.

A spokesman for the Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran warned that Biden's campaigns "have been financed by Islamic charities of the Iranian regime based in California."

Now, as America struggled with the pandemic, Biden hurried to propose a plan, not to help Americans, but to help Iran, to “streamline channels for banking” and weaken US sanctions.

NIAC Action endorsed Biden and appears to have raised a lot of money for him. What does NIAC expect in return? In its official endorsement, NIAC claimed that Biden had made an "ironclad commitment" to return to the Iran Deal. That would allow Iran to continue developing its nuclear program and provide it with an ongoing cash flow for international terrorism.

An article co-written by Abdi, one of Biden's biggest fundraisers, warned that "the U.S. has less leverage to secure concessions from Tehran given its own diminished credibility and Iran’s increasing nuclear leverage".

All of this comes as the FBI noted that Iranian hackers were targeting government websites in “an intentional effort to influence and interfere with the 2020 U.S. presidential election.”

Its hackers also sent threatening fake "Pro-Trump" emails to voters in Florida, among other states, warning, "You will vote for Trump on Election Day or we will come after you."

The move was transparently meant by the Iranians to aid the Biden-Harris campaign.

Had President Trump been the beneficiary of $100,000 or more in cash, a turnout operation, hacking attacks, and other forms of election interference from the networks around an enemy state, we would be hearing about it. Since all this is benefiting Biden, the story is being buried.

But Abdi isn’t the only troubling name on the list of Biden’s biggest bundlers.

One of them is Ijaz Ahmad.

Ahmad is the head of the American-Pakistani Political Action Committee (APPAC) who had boasted of being recognized by Pakistan's foreign ministry as the "true face of Pakistan".

APPAC is militantly opposed to India's attempts to stop Pakistani terrorism and Biden has been happy to pander to it, attacking India and expressing support for Islamic claims to Kashmir.

“We warmly welcome Mr. Biden’s policy declaration in support of people in occupied Kashmir,” Ahmad declared.

“Never before we have had so many Muslims in a position of influence in a presidential campaign,” Biden said, and quoted a Hadith.

APPAC noted that it had raised $320,000 for Biden, including $120,000 from Ahmad.

Tahir Javed, a candidate endorsed by APPAC, is also listed as a Biden bundler. As is Asif Mahmood, who ran for lieutenant governor in California, raising $1 million for the race, then for state insurance commissioner, before being appointed by Newsom to the Medical Board.

Pakistan is an Islamic terror state and an enemy of the United States, which harbored Osama bin Laden. The Bin Laden raid that Biden opposed targeted a Pakistani military town.

It’s deeply troubling that Biden doesn’t seem to have learned anything from that experience.

Another Islamic lobby member in the six figure Biden fundraiser club is Wa’el Alzayat, the head of Emgage. It’s been noted that Emgage is part of a network of Muslim Brotherhood organizations, and various figures in Emgage have connections to Islamic terrorist groups.

Another Biden bundler is Amed Khan, a member of an advisory council for the International Crisis Group founded by George Soros. In an editorial for the Quincy Institute, an anti-war group funded by Soros, Khan blamed the refugee problem on America's attacks on the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and on sanctions on the narcosocialist Maduro regime in Venezuela.

Another of the bundlers on the list is Hady Amr, Obama's Deputy Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations, who has co-authored articles calling for a Hamas deal.

Amr had been the founding director of the Brookings Doha Center in Qatar. The Islamic terror state of Qatar has dominated Brookings and is a major backer of the Brotherhood and Hamas.

But the most striking bundler on the six figure list may be Mohamed Soltan.

Soltan is the son of Muslim Brotherhood cleric Salah Soltan. Salah had claimed in television appearances that people from all over the world “thirst for the blood of the Jews, and predicted, “One of these days, the U.S. will suffer more deaths than all those killed in this third Gaza holocaust. This will happen soon.”

Mohammed Soltan claimed that he was tortured by Egypt’s new government which had removed the brutal Muslim Brotherhood regime from power. While it's not certain that the Mohammed Soltan on the Biden bundler list is the same man, Soltan lives in Fairfax, Virginia.

While Soltan has denied that he’s affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, he served as president of the Muslim Student Association at Ohio State. The MSA was set up by Muslim Brotherhood members. He was also a speaker at an American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) conference. The AMP has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, a terror arm of the Brotherhood.

Soltan has posted messages praising the Brotherhood and Hamas, describing the "Ikhwan" or Brotherhood as the "school that breeds amazing freedom fighters" like a Hamas leader.

In a tweet to the IDF spokesperson, Soltan declared that the terrorists were lions that would "annihilate u Zionist pigs".

A video shows him leading the "Khaybar" chant calling for the murder of Jews.

Joe Biden had tweeted support for Soltan by name and the Islamist supporter had thanked him personally after the Obama administration helped him escape Egyptian justice.

It’s understandable why the Biden campaign didn’t want Americans seeing a list of its top bundlers until now. The list contains disturbing names, lobbyists, and figures linked to Islamic terrorist organizations and regimes from Iran to Pakistan to the Muslim Brotherhood.

The presence of so many Islamist bundlers testifies not only to their determination to buy influence in a Biden administration, but Biden’s eagerness to sell out America. These donations are the culmination of decades of Biden’s pandering to Iran, to Pakistan, and to the Muslim Brotherhood. These are the numbers in cold hard cash for which Biden is betraying America.

The bundler list shows that Biden will aid Iran, Pakistan, and the Muslim Brotherhood. Islamic terrorists will thrive and Americans, and free people around the world, will die at their hands.

The Biden campaign is funded by supporters of Islamic terrorism because it supports terror.

[eretzyisrael]

What We Can Do About It

Last week I explained How They Did It, how the enemies of Israel – the Arabs, the Soviets, the international Left, and others – turned much of the West against us. What can we do about it?

I concentrated on the ‘softer’ aspects of cognitive warfare, such as the infiltration of higher education and international organizations like NGOs and UN agencies, corporations, the use of social media, the exploitation of minorities with grievances, and the support of public antisemites (e.g., Ilhan Omar). But we should keep in mind that more kinetic actions can also have primarily cognitive objectives. The PLO’s European terrorism during the 1970s paved the way for its conversion from a gang of despicable terrorists into a member of the UN, and for murderer and thief Yasser Arafat to become a “statesman.” The 9/11 attacks against the US changed the media portrayal of its Arab and Muslim citizens from “billionaires, bombers, and belly dancers” to hardworking citizens who are targets for islamophobic hatred (this is not the case with Jews, despite the fact that Jews are far more likely to be the victims of hate crimes today).

Terrorism works on various levels, but on the deepest, visceral one it creates paralyzing fear, which the mind – still subconsciously – tries to rationalize away by distancing itself from the victims and identifying with the terrorists. “Don’t kill me, I am on your side!” the terrorized mind shouts. “I’m one of the good ones!” (e.g, a “Jew for Palestine”).

The counterattack has to be planned, coordinated, and specifically targeted in all of the arenas, soft and hard, in which cognitive war is being waged against us. This is something the State of Israel has never come close to doing. Our efforts at public diplomacy have often been most charitably described as a bad joke, like the campaign to advertise Israel as a destination for gay tourism(“Come to Israel! We have nice beaches and we won’t hang you!”) At best we are reactive, responding to vicious accusations of war crimes, apartheid, and other depravities, usually long after the damage has been done. And we often ignore the cognitive implications of our actions, or the lack thereof.

It won’t be easy. Organized support for anti-Israel organizations (including those connected with terrorism) has been going on for decades, with millions of dollars annually flowing from sources like the George Soros organizationsand the European Union. Social media, especially, is constantly changing and new battlefields appear almost daily. Everywhere you look (e.g., Wikipedia) there is anti-Israel bias. And for every pro-Israel activist there are ten, or a hundred, attacking us.

An effective cognitive counterattack must have two parts: how we speak to the world, and – most important – how we act. Let me take the second part first.

There are basic human instincts that precede the ideas expressed in the UN charter by hundreds of thousands of years. Our actions must affect those instincts in a way that will cause others to respect us, and our enemies to fear us. I am not suggesting that we follow the example of the PLO and hijack planes in Europe, but our response to terrorism and threats from enemy countries (e.g., Iran) can be designed to have the appropriate effect. Humans are attracted to strength. They want to be on the side that’s stronger. They talk about the importance of moral and legal principles, but they bet on the winner. Our actions should radiate power and control, and even ruthlessness.

For example, no terrorist should survive his attack. Israeli security forces and the individuals involved have been sharply criticized, both by Israelis and others, for the “Bus 300 affair” in 1984, when two captured terrorists were executed in the field after interrogation. My contention is that this action sent exactly the right message, both to our enemies – “don’t try this or you will die” – and to the rest of the world – “Israel does not tolerate terrorism against her citizens.”

Our pusillanimous responses to Hamas, which has on numerous occasions killed Israelis and which today holds two Israeli citizens and the bodies of two soldiers hostage, is supposed to be justified for practical reasons, but is a total failure from the standpoint of cognitive warfare. When Israel bombs an unoccupied Hamas installation after arson balloons or even rockets from Gaza have burned crops or damaged buildings, the message that is sent is that we are too weak to protect ourselves. When our citizens are held captive while we supply electricity and water to the Gaza Strip, the message is that Hamas is in control, not Israel. I understand the limitations of our power, as viewed by the IDF, but I believe that they are not weighing the cognitive aspects of the question heavily enough.

Recently, the IDF demolished the home of a terrorist murderer, a citizen of the PA who was also an American citizen, despite a request from the US State Department to desist. This was the correct action from the cognitive point of view, sending the message that Israel is a sovereign state which controls Judea/Samaria, and which does not tolerate terrorism. On the other hand, the continued presence of the illegal Bedouin settlement of Khan al-Ahmar as a result of pressure from the EU and the UN tells the world that Israel does not control the land.

Our greatest enemy is Iran, whose regime has explicitly threatened to destroy us on numerous occasions and is developing nuclear weapons. There are obviously multiple considerations that play into choosing the best response, from a pre-emptive strike on her nuclear installations to a continuation of the campaign of sabotage that Israel has been waging for the last few years. Cognitively, the best approach is the one that publicly demonstrates that Israel has the power to destroy the installations, regardless of the distance or their fortification. This could be a massive aerial attack, or it could be covert action that is made public after the fact. The worst case is that we refrain from taking action because of pressure from the US.

In the soft realm, one priority is to put an end to Israel’s self-imposed cognitive failures. There is no reason that Israelis should be allowed to act as paid agents of the EU or the international Left, as is the case with B’Tselem and numerous other anti-state organizatons. There is a weakly enforced law that requires Israeli NGOs that receive half of their funding from foreign governments to report that, on penalty of a relatively small fine; and even that was opposed by the Left and the Arab parties in the Knesset. It is absurd that these groups should be allowed to operate in Israel. All foreign funding – private or governmental – for political NGOs should be forbidden, period. Representatives of foreign NGOs hostile to Israel should not be allowed into the country.

Speaking of Arab parties, there is a Basic Law that says that in order to run for election to the Knesset, a candidate or list must not “[negate] the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.” This law is interpreted loosely by the Supreme Court, so that Arabs who do precisely that can sit in the Knesset. That must end.

Israel has military censorship, which sometimes makes us look foolish when foreign publications are revealing details that Israelis are not allowed to read or hear from their own media, but at the same time, the Ha’aretz newspaper is allowed to attack the state, day in and day out, often using material from the foreign-funded NGOs. Foreign propaganda outlets make good use of it, saying “even Israelis admit…” This is unacceptable; it borders on treason, and it must stop.

There is a place for traditional hasbara, explanation, or presentation of the news from the viewpoint of the state. I am not sure why everyone is entitled to an opinion and a platform from which to broadcast it, while the state is not. Why not a government TV/radio/Internet news outlet, staffed with professionals who could respond immediately and accurately to false accusations? Doing this properly, so that it would be both authoritative and not boring, would be expensive and require high quality personnel that would not be easy to find; but it is worth doing.

Much of what I have suggested will be criticized because “it violates human rights” or it is “antidemocratic,” or similar things. I don’t disagree. But the idea that Israel has to be a paragon of human rights and democracy is wrong. It is an expression of the antisemitic idea that Jews must always be held to the highest of standards – indeed, to a standard that is continually raised so as to always be out of reach. Israel is not a Platonic ideal state; it is not even the United States. It is a tiny nation with no strategic depth that is surrounded by enemies who themselves violate every standard of civilized behavior. National survival is more important than human rights – especially when those defining the concept of human rights are indifferent (or worse) to our survival.

Abu Yehuda