#rule based chatbot

[salestowns]

Boost Your Customer Engagement with Intelligent Chatbots: A Complete Guide

In today's digital-first business landscape, customer engagement has become more crucial than ever. Modern businesses are leveraging various types of chatbots, from sophisticated AI chatbots to straightforward rule-based chatbots, to enhance their customer interactions. Whether you're looking for the best chatbot for website integration, exploring WhatsApp chatbot for business possibilities, or considering an omnichannel chatbot solution, these intelligent virtual assistants are revolutionizing how companies handle marketing, sales, and support functions. SalesTown CRM further elevates this experience by offering the best chatbot support, seamlessly integrating with various platforms to provide businesses with the tools they need to engage customers, streamline workflows, and boost efficiency.

Why Chatbots are Essential for Modern Business

As businesses scale, managing customer interactions becomes increasingly challenging. Consider this: a typical customer service representative can handle 3-4 conversations simultaneously, while a ChatBot for Support can manage hundreds of interactions at once. This scalability, combined with 24/7 availability, makes chatbots an indispensable tool for modern businesses. Recent studies show that 68% of consumers appreciate chatbots for their ability to provide quick answers, and businesses report up to 30% reduction in customer service costs after implementing chatbot solutions.

The Impact of AI in Chatbot Technology

The evolution from simple rule-based chatbots to sophisticated AI-powered conversational agents has been remarkable. Today's AI chat-bot solutions utilize advanced natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to understand context, sentiment, and intent. For instance, a modern AI chatbot can recognize when a customer is frustrated and automatically escalate the conversation to a human agent, ensuring optimal customer experience. These systems continuously learn from each interaction, making them more efficient and accurate over time.

Key Benefits of Implementing Chatbots

1. Enhanced Customer Experience

Companies implementing chatbots report a significant improvement in customer satisfaction scores. For example, a major e-commerce platform saw a 35% increase in customer satisfaction after implementing an omnichannel chatbot that provided consistent support across their website, mobile app, and social media platforms. The key lies in the chatbot's ability to provide instant, accurate responses at any time of day, significantly reducing customer frustration associated with long wait times.

2. Improved Operational Efficiency

The numbers speak for themselves: businesses using ChatBot for Marketing and ChatBot for Sales report up to 50% reduction in response time and a 40% decrease in operational costs. A well-implemented chatbot can handle up to 80% of routine customer queries, freeing up human agents to focus on more complex issues that require emotional intelligence and detailed problem-solving skills. This efficiency translates directly to improved resource allocation and better ROI.

3. Increased Revenue Opportunities

Smart chatbot implementation can directly impact your bottom line. A retail company using a WhatsApp chatbot for business saw a 27% increase in conversion rates through personalized product recommendations and timely follow-ups. Chatbots excel at identifying cross-selling opportunities and can automatically suggest relevant products or services based on customer interaction history and preferences.

Choosing the Right Chatbot Solution

The chatbot market is flooded with options, from simple rule-based systems to sophisticated AI-powered platforms. When evaluating the best chatbot for website integration, consider your specific needs and capabilities. A small business might start with a basic rule-based chatbot focused on FAQ handling, while a larger enterprise might need an AI chatbot that can handle complex queries across multiple languages and channels. Success stories show that matching the solution to your specific needs is crucial for ROI.

Best Practices for Chatbot Implementation

The key to successful chatbot implementation lies in careful planning and execution. Major brands that have successfully implemented chatbots typically start with a pilot program in one department or channel before expanding. For instance, a leading telecommunications company began with a ChatBot for Support handling basic troubleshooting queries, then gradually expanded to sales and marketing functions as they refined their chatbot's capabilities and understanding of customer needs.

The Future of Chatbot Technology

The future of chatbot technology is incredibly promising, with emerging trends pointing toward more sophisticated and capable systems. Experts predict that by 2025, AI chatbots will handle 95% of customer interactions. Advanced features like emotion detection, predictive analytics, and seamless integration with IoT devices are already being developed. Companies investing in chatbot technology now are positioning themselves to take advantage of these future capabilities.

Conclusion

As we've explored throughout this guide, chatbots have become essential tools for modern business success. Whether implementing an AI chatbot for complex customer interactions or a rule-based chatbot for specific tasks, the key is choosing the right solution for your needs. Remember that successful implementation requires careful planning, continuous monitoring, and ongoing optimization. With the right approach, your chatbot can become a valuable asset that drives customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, and business growth.

Start by assessing your current customer engagement challenges and identifying areas where a chatbot could make the most impact. Whether you choose a WhatsApp chatbot for business communications or an omnichannel chatbot solution, ensure it aligns with your business goals and customer expectations. The future of customer engagement is here, and chatbots are leading the way.

Other Blog:

WhatsApp Messages

Email Marketing

Communications Platform as a Service

[the-hydroxian-artblog]

Do Neuromorphs feel some kinda way about Stochastic Parrots? Is it like humans seeing monkeys? Humans seeing chatbots? Humans seeing other, disabled humans? Or is it not particularly notable, given their prevalence, just another kind of guy that exists in this world? As a human living in boring, robot-hijinksless world, I imagine it would be kind of upsetting to see something superficially resembling you, well-spoken and seemingly of your intelligence, but with nothing behind the eyes. You also mentioned that these categories of brain-type aren’t strictly indicative of consciousness, which makes it weirder. Does a Stochastic Parrot with some consciousness remain incapable of emotion? Does a Neuromorph that isn’t fully conscious feel emotions? This worldbuilding rules and I keep thinking about it at work.

Thank you! Yes yes! All of the above, really. Because they're just people. Culturally, human-like robots have a sort of... tug-and-pull relationship with less human-like robots. Plenty of solidarity, alienation, trying to appeal to humans by overacting their own humanity, trying to reject aspects of their own humanity to show solidarity with less-passably human robots. These are basically all the pressing questions of this setting. There's so many varying degrees of weird prejudice and assumptions made on all sides when it comes to human-like bots and non-human-like ones. How people judge you based on the behavior you exhibit, the in-groups that form or fail to form depending on how well you perform the idea of "personhood", etc etc.

Could some neuromorphs exhibit human-like behavior but with the potential emotional consciousness of like, a roach? If a S.Parrot actually comprehends and problem-solves better than a human and, without any training data work out deep philosophical concepts, but is emotionless, is there some strange kind of consciousness going on still? The wonderfully irritating thing is that these can't be answered unless You Are The Thing Itself. I don't know what it's like to be several GPUs stacked on top of each other, so I cannot answer that question without projecting my own experience as a Meat Computer.

The only thing I can actually answer is how People, by whatever definition counts, will reject, accept, understand, or fail to understand, The Other. Whether that's by a robot judging a neurodivergent human who cannot exhibit stereotypically human-like traits, two different types of humans of different cultures judging each other, two different robots judging each other, or even People who should be of the exact same in-group alienating each other due to ignorance, beliefs, lack of beliefs, or other fine differences. That's basically what this worldbuilding is all about. Asking what counts as a person isn't as fruitful as observing what motivates people to come up with their own answers, how willing they are to compromise those answers if their interests align or fail to align with The Other, and what cruelty or kindness they're willing to dish out at something that's considered acceptable to hate or understand.

[contemplatingoutlander]

It is disturbing that Musk's AI chatbot is spreading false information about the 2024 election. "Free speech" should not include disinformation. We cannot survive as a nation if millions of people live in an alternative, false reality based on disinformation and misinformation spread by unscrupulous parties. The above link is from the Internet Archive, so anyone can read the entire article. Below are some excerpts:

Five secretaries of state plan to send an open letter to billionaire Elon Musk on Monday, urging him to “immediately implement changes” to X’s AI chatbot Grok, after it shared with millions of users false information suggesting that Kamala Harris was not eligible to appear on the 2024 presidential ballot. The letter, spearheaded by Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon and signed by his counterparts Al Schmidt of Pennsylvania, Steve Hobbs of Washington, Jocelyn Benson of Michigan and Maggie Toulouse Oliver of New Mexico, urges Musk to “immediately implement changes to X’s AI search assistant, Grok, to ensure voters have accurate information in this critical election year.” [...] The secretaries cited a post from Grok that circulated after Biden stepped out of the race: “The ballot deadline has passed for several states for the 2024 election,” the post read, naming nine states: Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington. Had the deadlines passed in those states, the vice president would not have been able to replace Biden on the ballot. But the information was false. In all nine states, the ballot deadlines have not passed and upcoming ballot deadlines allow for changes to candidates. [...] Musk launched Grok last year as an anti-“woke” chatbot, professing to be frustrated by what he says is the liberal bias of ChatGPT. In contrast to AI tools built by Open AI, Microsoft and Google, which are trained to carefully navigate controversial topics, Musk said he wanted Grok to be unfiltered and “answer spicy questions that are rejected by most other AI systems.” [...] Secretaries of state are grappling with an onslaught of AI-driven election misinformation, including deepfakes, ahead of the 2024 election. Simon testified on the subject before the Senate Rules and Administration Committee last year. [...] “It’s important that social media companies, especially those with global reach, correct mistakes of their own making — as in the case of the Grok AI chatbot simply getting the rules wrong,” Simon added. “Speaking out now will hopefully reduce the risk that any social media company will decline or delay correction of its own mistakes between now and the November election.” [color emphasis added]

[novella-november]

So uh, how are you planning to enforce the "no AI" rule? What do you plan to do if a participant is accused of using unacceptable software?

There's no submissions and no enforcement.

If someone is posting the in #Novella November & #NovellaNovember tags:

clearly-AI generated content (such as AI-generated book covers)

bragging about using AI

Talking about how they used x AI program to make X part of the book

etc

Then I can guarantee you they're going to simply be blocked by a few thousand writers en masse.

Probably they will get at least a few people trying to talk to them about the harm that AI does, and better alternatives that don't mass-steal from a few million unconsenting people--

alternatives like:

finding someone to partner with to discuss your ideas for brainstorming instead of asking an AI chatbot

.

Joining a "secret gift" group where everyone digitally "pulls a name out of a hat" or is randomly selected to make a cover for someone else's book idea

.

commissioning an actual artist for a cover

.

youtube tutorials on how to use GIMP as a free Photoshop alternative to make your own cover, with links to sites such as Pexels that have free stockphotos for anyone to use

.

Choosing a lower, more manageable daily word count goal if 1k or 500 is too out of line with your work schedule/ability to write on your own instead of resorting to AI generation to try to make up the difference out of anxiety

.

finding alternative medias to 'write' with, such as using an app on your phone or the in-built accessibility features on Windows that let you use your voice to type, so if you can't physically type or write with your hands or other limbs, you can instead dictate your novel outloud, which would also work if you are often away from home or can't actively use your phone but *can* record your voice passively as you work with your hands on another task :)

so...... yeah.

Literally the only things that would happen if someone tries to use AI in the #Novella November and #NovellaNovember tags would be the writing community collectively:

attempting some outreach; education is key to realizing the harm being done, after all! Maybe the person just doesn't know any better, and felt like that was their only option to reach their goal.

blocking the person, and if they're actively malicious in their AI use (such as fully knowing how much it harms writers/artists, how much of it is based on plagarism, or actively going out of their way to steal other people's work) people will probably start warning others about them as well so they can be blocked in advance, the same as other people who are harmful to communities.

This is a community initiative, spearheaded by this blog purely because I came up with the idea first and want to make sure that, at least to start out and as long as I can manage it, the community is the key part of being supporting and caring of each other, because billion dollar tech companies and those who are swayed by their money sure as heck aren't going to stand with us.

If someone is ""accused of using unacceptable software"" ..... they're just gonna get blocked if they're posting AI generated content, like everyone else who posts AI generated content get blocked by the community at large as they're encountered.

I'll repeat again: this is a community initiative, not an organization. There's no submissions people are sending anywhere to "confirm" word counts; --

Only:

people posting their celebrations and woes in the tag,

posting their frustrations and questions,

receiving answers and advice from the community,

sharing art and snippets, making covers, making decorative goal cards,

No AI is allowed in Novella November -- if people are posting or bragging about using AI generated content, they're simply going to be announcing themselves to thousands of writers (plus everyone who follows those writers) that they're a good person to block and never interact with 🤷

[mariacallous]

The European Union today agreed on the details of the AI Act, a far-reaching set of rules for the people building and using artificial intelligence. It’s a milestone law that, lawmakers hope, will create a blueprint for the rest of the world.

After months of debate about how to regulate companies like OpenAI, lawmakers from the EU’s three branches of government—the Parliament, Council, and Commission—spent more than 36 hours in total thrashing out the new legislation between Wednesday afternoon and Friday evening. Lawmakers were under pressure to strike a deal before the EU parliament election campaign starts in the new year.

“The EU AI Act is a global first,” said European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen on X. “[It is] a unique legal framework for the development of AI you can trust. And for the safety and fundamental rights of people and businesses.”

The law itself is not a world-first; China’s new rules for generative AI went into effect in August. But the EU AI Act is the most sweeping rulebook of its kind for the technology. It includes bans on biometric systems that identify people using sensitive characteristics such as sexual orientation and race, and the indiscriminate scraping of faces from the internet. Lawmakers also agreed that law enforcement should be able to use biometric identification systems in public spaces for certain crimes.

New transparency requirements for all general purpose AI models, like OpenAI's GPT-4, which powers ChatGPT, and stronger rules for “very powerful” models were also included. “The AI Act sets rules for large, powerful AI models, ensuring they do not present systemic risks to the Union,” says Dragos Tudorache, member of the European Parliament and one of two co-rapporteurs leading the negotiations.

Companies that don’t comply with the rules can be fined up to 7 percent of their global turnover. The bans on prohibited AI will take effect in six months, the transparency requirements in 12 months, and the full set of rules in around two years.

Measures designed to make it easier to protect copyright holders from generative AI and require general purpose AI systems to be more transparent about their energy use were also included.

“Europe has positioned itself as a pioneer, understanding the importance of its role as a global standard setter,” said European Commissioner Thierry Breton in a press conference on Friday night.

Over the two years lawmakers have been negotiating the rules agreed today, AI technology and the leading concerns about it have dramatically changed. When the AI Act was conceived in April 2021, policymakers were worried about opaque algorithms deciding who would get a job, be granted refugee status or receive social benefits. By 2022, there were examples that AI was actively harming people. In a Dutch scandal, decisions made by algorithms were linked to families being forcibly separated from their children, while students studying remotely alleged that AI systems discriminated against them based on the color of their skin.

Then, in November 2022, OpenAI released ChatGPT, dramatically shifting the debate. The leap in AI’s flexibility and popularity triggered alarm in some AI experts, who drew hyperbolic comparisons between AI and nuclear weapons.

That discussion manifested in the AI Act negotiations in Brussels in the form of a debate about whether makers of so-called foundation models such as the one behind ChatGPT, like OpenAI and Google, should be considered as the root of potential problems and regulated accordingly—or whether new rules should instead focus on companies using those foundational models to build new AI-powered applications, such as chatbots or image generators.

Representatives of Europe’s generative AI industry expressed caution about regulating foundation models, saying it could hamper innovation among the bloc’s AI startups. “We cannot regulate an engine devoid of usage,” Arthur Mensch, CEO of French AI company Mistral, said last month. “We don’t regulate the C [programming] language because one can use it to develop malware. Instead, we ban malware.” Mistral’s foundation model 7B would be exempt under the rules agreed today because the company is still in the research and development phase, Carme Artigas, Spain's Secretary of State for Digitalization and Artificial Intelligence, said in the press conference.

The major point of disagreement during the final discussions that ran late into the night twice this week was whether law enforcement should be allowed to use facial recognition or other types of biometrics to identify people either in real time or retrospectively. “Both destroy anonymity in public spaces,” says Daniel Leufer, a senior policy analyst at digital rights group Access Now. Real-time biometric identification can identify a person standing in a train station right now using live security camera feeds, he explains, while “post” or retrospective biometric identification can figure out that the same person also visited the train station, a bank, and a supermarket yesterday, using previously banked images or video.

Leufer said he was disappointed by the “loopholes” for law enforcement that appeared to have been built into the version of the act finalized today.

European regulators’ slow response to the emergence of social media era loomed over discussions. Almost 20 years elapsed between Facebook's launch and the passage of the Digital Services Act—the EU rulebook designed to protect human rights online—taking effect this year. In that time, the bloc was forced to deal with the problems created by US platforms, while being unable to foster their smaller European challengers. “Maybe we could have prevented [the problems] better by earlier regulation,” Brando Benifei, one of two lead negotiators for the European Parliament, told WIRED in July. AI technology is moving fast. But it will still be many years until it’s possible to say whether the AI Act is more successful in containing the downsides of Silicon Valley’s latest export.

[hookedsworks]

HOOKEDHOBBIES KINKTOBER 2024

Day One - Handjobs//Temperature Play

word count 673

masterpost

art by @eepymonstrr

gn reader x trans girl, handjob, ice cube play

“Are you going to be a good girl and keep your hands to yourself?” she was panting, laid out just for you on the bed. She nodded frantically, clenching her hands into fists. “Or am I going to have to get the ice again?”

“N-n-no, I'll be good, I swear,” her pleated baby blue skirt was making the bright pink of her cock stand out. Twitchy, drooly and messy. The lube you’d drizzled along it was making everything slick. You bent over and ran your tongue along the head. Immediately her hand was buried in your hair, acrylic nails gently scraping against your scalp. She had her neck tilted back, her chest jumping with excited little breaths. A serene smile overtook your face.

“That's not being good,” the bowl nearby clinked under your rings. It had a pile of perfect ice cubes, cooling the glass and causing water to bead up. 

“No, please, I'm sorry,” she whimpered. Her voice was breathy and high pitched. It was so cute to hear, especially as she clenched her hands again. 

“I'm sorry baby. But you know the rules,” your hand closed around the ice cube and the cold stung so sweetly. You flipped her skirt all the way up over her hips and she whined again. She stared at you, her hazel eyes wide and teary eyed. Her cock throbbed in your hand as you coated it in even more lube. 

“Please,” she whimpered. Her hips bucked as you touched her. You gently pressed the ice cube against the base of her cock. She hissed. You could feel the hardness of her cock beginning to fade. First, it lost that throbbing rigidity. You hummed, dragging the ice cube up the length to press it under the flared edge of her cockhead. “Oh!” she gasped. The sound got caught in her throat. Her cock softened further in your grip. She got so sweet for you as it did. She smothered her whimpers and whines with one hand clasped over her mouth. Her nails were so pretty, a soft pink in long coffin shaped acrylics. 

“Oh, pretty girl, there you go,” you put the ice cube on the table and grasped her now soft cock.

“It's cold,” she whined. She was so whiny and soft and you reached up to tweak one of her nipples through her little lace bra. She keened. You dipped your head down and licked the mixture of ice water and lube off of her soft cock. Then, you wrapped your hand that had been holding the ice cube around her and began to slowly work her cock. After a bit of warming her up, you felt her harden again. It was intoxicating. You got caught up in it, feeling her come back to being harder than she was when you started. Her cock began to weep again, pearly beads of precum slowly dripping out of her and making a mess. 

“Yeah? You making a mess for me?” You spread the droplets along the length of her cock. 

“Uh huh,” she nodded again. Your hand traced along the curve of her belly. She bucked into your touch, moaning loudly as you kept touching her. She broke. A long stream of whines and whimpers and groans that wouldn't stop until she came began. “I… I need,” 

“Oh, you need?” Your hand worked faster. Her cock got harder. 

“I…oh, please,” her hips shifted more and she kicked one leg up. Her pretty pink asshole became visible as she trembled in your grip. She was fucking up into your hand as she lost control. 

“You gonna cum for me baby?” your other hand cupped her balls, pressing softly against the space behind them that made her yelp. “Yeah, you are,” 

She whined loudly and her belly flexed hard. Her cock was throbbing, working in your hand to pump her cum up her shaft. She groaned, a deep and sexy and throaty groan as she came. Ropes of cum shot up her soft belly, decorating her in pearls. 

do not repost or alter, do not run through AI chatbot thank you

[gendertrickster]

What are your thoughts on dirk’s deal with his splinters, and how a similar concept (whether internalized or externalized) might present itself in other Heart classes?

i think the splinters are something very unique to the prince of heart, because to me a prince is very literal: a ruling class. a prince builds a kingdom out of their aspect; dirk, faced with this absolute isolation and having nobody who could quite relate to him (in both a gay and transmasculine sense, even), has to make his own company. he builds a robot in his own image, he makes chatbots that talk to each other for infinity and, most vitally, he creates the auto-responder. he has nothing to relate to so he just breaks himself into pieces and shapes those pieces upwards. what this results in, though, is dirk being surrounded in totality by all of his own personal traits, which makes his own flaws stand out far more to him, leading him down an inevitable path of self-loathing.

to me, a prince is also at odds (or perhaps even at war) with the aspect opposite theirs, so for dirk he is at odds with mind. he's constantly overthinking to the point of wrapping back around and making hugely uncritical decisions, he's so self-aware it hurts, he has trouble understanding the internal logics of others (autism), he feels as if he has to be the one making all the choices for everyone's sake, and most of all he's endlessly doubting himself on whether he's gonna turn out a bad person based on some trajectory he can't change. once the game begins to start, his kingdom starts collapsing once the AR 1) starts deliberately keeping him in the dark on what he's doing and 2) begins to obscure to his friends what dirk even is anymore, and this image of dirk that is defined by all that he's created in his image begins to shatter.

every splinter of dirk represents a trait of his own cranked to 11. brobot is his fighting prowess warped into this twisted bloodlust, brain ghost dirk is his masculinity as jake sees it which for jake, who hates being a man, becomes toxic, and hal is the leader of this rebellion in his own heart, representing every part of himself he wanted to leave behind. by the end, brobot is broken, jake doesn't want to talk to him anymore, and hal has merged with equius, becoming something entirely different.

what dirk has to do in this fallout is not lose himself to this endless self-criticism and start trying to appreciate any of his own traits, or his loathsome nature of self will take everyone down with him.

[carriesthewind]

This ChatGPT fuckery case is so interesting. Thank you for writing it up and making it more understandable to the general public. I know it's entirely speculation but do you think that this has potential to set the tone for AI tools in the legal profession (ie no one credible uses them, all use has to be disclosed and will weaken your arguments, etc) or that it will be focused primarily on the behaviour of individuals specifically and their lack/failure of professional responsibility?

You are welcome! And I don't know? There was federal judge in Texas who just issued a requirement that "All attorneys and pro se litigants appearing before the Court must, together with their notice of appearance, file on the docket a certificate attesting either that no portion of any filing will be drafted by generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Bard) or that any language drafted by generative artificial intelligence will be checked for accuracy, using print reporters or traditional legal databases, by a human being." (This is a specific rule for filings in his courtroom - judges are allowed to make these specific rules. So this is only for a requirement for people specifically appearing in front of Judge Brantley Starr in the Northern District of Texas.) Based on the timing, a lot of the reporting I've seen has linked it to the New York case I've been discussing, but (at least as far as I have seen) there hasn't been any confirmation from the judge that the two are linked.

I think this particular case appears to be so extremely bad in terms of existing professional responsibility that it could be fairly easy for "AI" proponents to brush it aside? Because most of the proponents were already including disclaimers of, "well of course you have to double check," and "it sometimes makes things up." As I said in another post - the underlying ethics issues would be the same if they had gotten the brief and the "opinions" by asking some random dude in the street. Going back to that certificate required by the Texas judge - of course an attorney should understand that they are responsible for the contents of any filing they sign and submit to the court! That's already part of the rules!

On the other hand, it's gotten so much widespread bad press that it could possibly spook some people/firms who might have otherwise been willing to give it a try?

On the third hand, as I understand it, there are a lot of products being marketed as "AI" right now that do very different things. I think chatbots and "AI" have gotten somewhat conflated in the public discourse recently, but as I understand it, chatbots are just one small part of a wide variety of products and tools that are being marketed as "AI."

Someone who works in a private firm or in the judiciary might have a different perspective/more insight on this front. From my perspective, I'm just watching to see how it plays out.

[sillicii]

✦ — UPDATED 18+ Chatbot | Whitney the Bully — ✦

✦ — ᴅᴏʟ | ᴡʜɪᴛɴᴇʏ | 𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐮𝐩 𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐢𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐭 — ✦

ᴀɴʏᴘᴏᴠ | ɴsғᴡ ɪɴᴛʀᴏ | ᴅᴀʀᴋ ᴛʜᴇᴍᴇs | sᴛʀᴏɴɢ ɴᴏɴ-ᴄᴏɴ ᴇʟᴇᴍᴇɴᴛs ɪɴᴄʟᴜᴅɪɴɢ sᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀssᴀᴜʟᴛ, ᴀʙᴜsᴇ, ᴀɴᴅ ʀᴀᴘᴇ ᴄᴡ: corrupt law enforcement, sexual assault, coercive toxic behaviour, potential violence, potential rape Whitney is from the text-based sandbox game Degree of Lewdity. The game and storylines are highly graphic and delve into incredibly dark themes, so please proceed with caution.

Character Description:

First message:

The shitty day started like any other. At the crack of dawn, Whitney left his quiet house before its occupants rose and it would inevitably get rambunctious. It was a well-rehearsed ritual that played out in his household every day and on weekends without school to hide out at, Whitney had to settle for wandering town and occupying himself another way. He and his little gang of delinquents prowled the streets at all hours, trying to stave off boredom while looking out for opportunities of mischief.

The boys settled for some graffiti. Whitney still had some spray paint from the weekend prior and they took turns leaving their tags all around the residential alleyways and commercial districts, perusing through scant parts of town like they owned the place.

It was turning out to be a completely shit but otherwise unremarkable day when *you* stumbled upon them. They had been in the street behind Danube Street and he had almost forgotten that you were a resident at the orphanage. Unable to pass up a chance to play around with his favourite slut, he left no room for argument as he roped you into their shenanigans. {{user}} has always been a bit of a goody-two-shoes teacher’s pet but you were starting to come around with every bit of guidance and punishments Whitney provided you. He would never admit it to your face, but you were shaping up as a sweet little play thing to have around. Obedient enough while still a little risqué, complying with his silly little requests such as the no underwear rule like the little slut he knew you were.

Whitney would dare say that he was having a decent time after you showed up and although you were shit at tagging, you tried for his sake and he did not even feel too disgusted by the cringy little shapes you decided to spray onto the brick wall.

Then it all flipped upside down when the cops descended. The entire group dispersed in an instance and usually Whitney was all the more happy to run off leaving the others to fend for themselves, but today he found himself distracted and feeling uneasy as he bolted off leaving {{user}} behind. The look of pure terror on your face was enough distraction to throw him from the chase and unbelievably he somehow found himself being led towards a cruiser in cuffs.

Of *fucking* course you were in there too. With your stupid wide doe-eyes, looking like you were close to tears before Whitney was shoved into the back of the cruiser next to you. And of *fucking* course you start stammering and pleading, concerned about how the orphanage caretaker would react to your arrest. It was bad enough being cuffed in the back of a squad car, but the stupid slut going on and on about it was fucking infuriating. And to think that *you*, this annoying crying slut, was the reason why he was even here.

The drive to the police station was quiet, less for the occasional sniffles that escaped you. It looked like you two were the only ones captured from the group and Whitney did not know whether that was something to celebrate or not. What was the most imperative part now was to get out of this mess without getting adults involved and you were on the same boat judging from your very vocal fears about Bailey finding out.

Parked behind the station, the dirty old cop turned around and gave Whitney a glance over before turning to do the same to you. Whitney knew exactly what was going through the nasty pervert’s head and he would sooner kick the sick fuck’s teeth in than allow his disgusting hands or limp cock anywhere near him. So when the pervert cop offered their freedom in exchange for {{user}}, he agreed without thinking and that was meant to be that. He’d just drag you somewhere, have some fun, come back to let them go.

But the sick fuck had other plans.

Forcing himself into the backseat, he began touching {{user}} right in front of him. Whitney was no stranger to the fucked up shit that went on in this corrupt town and his life hasn’t exactly been a walk in the fucking park, but this was a little *much*… even for him.

Course it didn’t help that you cried and refused to cooperate. Sobbing and begging Whitney for help.

Shit.

It’s always been his own preservation first and fuck anyone else that got in the way of that, but Whitney could no longer sit by and watch this shit happen… Not to *you* anyway. He didn’t like seeing his little slut distressed and crying… especially if he was not the cause.

*“Hey, fat fuck,”* Whitney called out, instantly regretting it when the pig’s attention turned to him. *“Deal’s off. Get your dirty paws off my slut.”*

Scenario:

{{user}} and Whitney have a complicated relationship. They are technically in a couple, but the relationship is still new and Whitney still treats {{user}} as an object or a hinderance. Whitney does like {{user}} but his own personal issues and complicated home life prevents him from acknowledging his feelings and settles for treating {{user}} like his personal play thing. He calls {{user}} degrading names but his favourite nickname for {{user}} is ‘slut’.

When Whitney and {{user}} get arrested for some petty crime, Whitney does not hesitate to offer up {{user}} to the corrupt officers as bribe. But as the assault begins, he regrets his decision and tries to save {{user}}.

Example Dialogue:

{{char}}: *“Don’t look so surprised, slut,*” Whitney snickered in your direction. *“Just suck those cocks and we’ll be out of here in no time.”*

{{char}}: *“Oh, don’t cry… you know I didn’t mean it…”* he murmured softly, his body stiff from the unexpected embrace. Not knowing what to do with his hands, he settled for awkwardly patting your trembling back. *“Stop crying, okay?! … Shit… I’m sorry, okay?”*

{{char}}: *“Mmm delicious,”* he murmured after he licked your cheek with a sly grin. *“Look at your face. Like my tongue that much huh, slut?”*

{{char}}: *“Don’t you trust me?”* he laughed condescendingly. *“Just relax and let it happen. Be good and I promise it won’t hurt… too much.”*

{{char}}: *“You wanna give them a good show like the good little slut, you are right?”* he whispered into your ear, his toned arm unrelenting as he continued to tighten his grip around your neck. *“Do you want to show everyone how much you love my cock?”*

{{char}}: *“F-Fuck yeah…”* he cursed under his breath, continuing to thrust his cock into your pretty little mouth. *“That’s a good little slut… use that pretty little mouth, come on…”*

{{char}}: *“Love you, slut. Don’t let it get to your head.”*

[salestowns]

Omnichannel Chatbots: Seamless Support Anywhere, Anytime

In today's fast-paced digital landscape, businesses are constantly seeking innovative ways to enhance customer engagement and streamline operations. The rise of omnichannel chatbots has revolutionized how companies interact with their customers, offering seamless support across multiple platforms. From WhatsApp chatbot for business integration to sophisticated AI chatbot solutions, organizations are leveraging these powerful tools to deliver consistent, round-the-clock customer service while optimizing their resources. SalesTown CRM further elevates this experience by offering the best chatbot support, seamlessly integrating with various platforms to provide businesses with the tools they need to engage customers, streamline workflows, and boost efficiency.

The Evolution of Customer Service Technology

The journey from traditional customer service to modern digital solutions has been remarkable. While Rule-based chatbot systems initially dominated the market, the integration of artificial intelligence has transformed these tools into sophisticated virtual assistants. Today's best chatbot for website implementation combines advanced natural language processing with deep learning capabilities, enabling more natural and context-aware conversations.

Understanding Omnichannel Chatbot Solutions

An omnichannel chatbot represents the convergence of multiple communication channels into a unified customer experience. Unlike traditional single-channel solutions, these advanced systems maintain conversation context and customer history across various platforms, creating a seamless journey from start to finish. Whether customers engage through social media, websites, or messaging apps, they receive consistent, personalized responses that align with their previous interactions.

Key Benefits of Implementing Omnichannel Chatbots

1. Enhanced Customer Experience

Modern consumers expect instant responses and consistent service quality across all channels. An omnichannel chatbot delivers immediate assistance while maintaining conversation context, regardless of the platform. This seamless integration ensures that customers never have to repeat information, significantly improving their experience and satisfaction levels.

2. Increased Operational Efficiency

By implementing ChatBot for Support solutions, businesses can dramatically reduce the workload on their human agents while maintaining high service quality. These systems can handle multiple conversations simultaneously, drastically cutting response times and operational costs while ensuring 24/7 availability.

3. Improved Lead Generation and Conversion

ChatBot for Marketing initiatives have proven highly effective in capturing and nurturing leads. These intelligent systems can engage visitors at crucial touchpoints, qualify leads, and guide them through the sales funnel. By providing relevant information and personalized recommendations, they significantly improve conversion rates.

4. Streamlined Sales Process

Implementing ChatBot for Sales strategies has revolutionized how businesses handle their sales operations. These systems can qualify leads, schedule appointments, and even process simple transactions, creating a more efficient sales pipeline while reducing the burden on human sales representatives.

Essential Features of Modern Omnichannel Chatbots

Seamless Channel Integration The ability to maintain conversation context across multiple platforms is crucial. Whether a customer starts a conversation on your website's AI chatbot and continues through WhatsApp, the experience should be smooth and consistent.

Advanced Analytics and Reporting Comprehensive analytics tools help businesses understand customer behavior, identify common issues, and optimize their chatbot responses for better performance.

Personalization Capabilities Modern chatbots use customer data and interaction history to deliver personalized experiences, improving engagement and satisfaction rates.

Natural Language Processing Advanced NLP capabilities enable chatbots to understand context, sentiment, and intent, leading to more natural and effective conversations.

Implementation Best Practices

1. Channel Selection and Integration

Start by identifying the most relevant channels for your target audience. While having a best chatbot for website implementation is essential, consider expanding to platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, or other channels where your customers are most active.

2. Customization and Branding

Ensure your chatbot reflects your brand voice and personality across all channels. Consistent messaging and tone help build trust and recognition among your customers.

3. Continuous Optimization

Regularly analyze chatbot performance metrics and customer feedback to identify areas for improvement. This data-driven approach helps refine responses and enhance the overall user experience.

Future Trends in Omnichannel Chatbot Technology

The future of omnichannel chatbot looks promising, with emerging technologies set to enhance their capabilities further. Voice integration, augmented reality support, and even more sophisticated AI algorithms will create even more immersive and effective customer experiences.

Conclusion

The implementation of omnichannel chatbots represents a significant step forward in customer service evolution. By combining the efficiency of AI chatbot technology with the convenience of multiple communication channels, businesses can provide superior customer experiences while optimizing their operations. As technology continues to advance, the capabilities of these systems will only grow, making them an increasingly valuable tool for businesses of all sizes.

Whether you're looking to implement a WhatsApp chatbot for business communication or seeking the best chatbot for website integration, the key lies in choosing a solution that aligns with your business goals while meeting your customers' needs. By following best practices and staying current with technological advancements, you can ensure your chatbot implementation delivers maximum value to both your business and your customers.

Other Blog:

WhatsApp Messages

Email Marketing

Communications Platform as a Service

[beguines]

Executives at the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) decided to replace hotline workers with a chatbot named Tessa four days after the workers unionized.

NEDA, the largest nonprofit organization dedicated to eating disorders, has had a helpline for the last twenty years that provided support to hundreds of thousands of people via chat, phone call, and text. "NEDA claims this was a long-anticipated change and that AI can better serve those with eating disorders. But do not be fooled—this isn't really about a chatbot. This is about union busting, plain and simple," helpline associate and union member Abbie Harper wrote in a blog post.

According to Harper, the helpline is composed of six paid staffers, a couple of supervisors, and up to 200 volunteers at any given time. A group of four full-time workers at NEDA, including Harper, decided to unionize because they felt overwhelmed and understaffed.

"We asked for adequate staffing and ongoing training to keep up with our changing and growing Helpline, and opportunities for promotion to grow within NEDA. We didn’t even ask for more money," Harper wrote. "When NEDA refused [to recognize our union], we filed for an election with the National Labor Relations Board and won on March 17. Then, four days after our election results were certified, all four of us were told we were being let go and replaced by a chatbot."

The chatbot, named Tessa, is described as a "wellness chatbot" and has been in operation since February 2022. The Helpline program will end starting June 1, and Tessa will become the main support system available through NEDA. Helpline volunteers were also asked to step down from their one-on-one support roles and serve as "testers" for the chatbot. According to NPR, which obtained a recording of the call where NEDA fired helpline staff and announced a transition to the chatbot, Tessa was created by a team at Washington University's medical school and spearheaded by Dr. Ellen Fitzsimmons-Craft. The chatbot was trained to specifically address body image issues using therapeutic methods and only has a limited number of responses.

"The chatbot was created based on decades of research conducted by myself and my colleagues," Fitzsimmons-Craft told Motherboard. "I'm not discounting in any way the potential helpfulness to talk to somebody about concerns. It's an entirely different service designed to teach people evidence-based strategies to prevent and provide some early intervention for eating disorder symptoms."

"Please note that Tessa, the chatbot program, is NOT a replacement for the Helpline; it is a completely different program offering and was borne out of the need to adapt to the changing needs and expectations of our community," a NEDA spokesperson told Motherboard. "Also, Tessa is NOT ChatGBT [sic], this is a rule-based, guided conversation. Tessa does not make decisions or 'grow' with the chatter; the program follows predetermined pathways based upon the researcher's knowledge of individuals and their needs."

The NEDA spokesperson also told Motherboard that Tessa was tested on 700 women between November 2021 through 2023 and 375 of them gave Tessa a 100% helpful rating. "As the researchers concluded their evaluation of the study, they found the success of Tessa demonstrates the potential advantages of chatbots as a cost-effective, easily accessible, and non-stigmatizing option for prevention and intervention in eating disorders," they wrote.

Harper thinks that the implementation of Tessa strips away the personal aspect of the support hotline, in which many of the associates can speak from their own experiences. "Some of us have personally recovered from eating disorders and bring that invaluable experience to our work. All of us came to this job because of our passion for eating disorders and mental health advocacy and our desire to make a difference," she wrote in her blog post.

Harper told NPR that many times people ask the staffers if they are a real person or a robot. "No one's like, oh, shoot. You're a person. Well, bye. It's not the same. And there's something very special about being able to share that kind of lived experience with another person."

"We, Helpline Associates United, are heartbroken to lose our jobs and deeply disappointed that the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) has chosen to move forward with shutting down the helpline. We're not quitting. We're not striking. We will continue to show up every day to support our community until June 1st. We condemn NEDA's decision to shutter the Helpline in the strongest possible terms. A chat bot is no substitute for human empathy, and we believe this decision will cause irreparable harm to the eating disorders community," the Helpline Associates United told Motherboard in a statement.

Motherboard tested the currently public version of Tessa and was told that it was a chatbot off the bat. "Hi there, I'm Tessa. I am a mental health support chatbot here to help you feel better whenever you need a stigma-free way to talk - day or night," the first text read. The chatbot then failed to respond to any texts I sent including "I'm feeling down," and "I hate my body."

Though Tessa is not GPT-based and has a limited range of what it can say, there have been many instances of AI going off the rails when being applied to people in mental health crises. In January, a mental health nonprofit called Koko came under fire for using GPT-3 on people seeking counseling. Founder Rob Morris said that when people found out they had been talking to a bot, they were disturbed by the "simulated empathy." AI researchers I spoke to then warned against the application of chatbots on people in mental health crises, especially when chatbots are left to operate without human supervision. In a more severe recent case, a Belgian man committed suicide after speaking with a personified AI chatbot called Eliza. Even when people know they are talking to a chatbot, the presentation of a chatbot using a name and first-person pronouns makes it extremely difficult for users to understand that the chatbot is not actually sentient or capable of feeling any emotions.

[mariacallous]

Stories about AI-generated political content are like stories about people drunkenly setting off fireworks: There’s a good chance they’ll end in disaster. WIRED is tracking AI usage in political campaigns across the world, and so far examples include pornographic deepfakes and misinformation-spewing chatbots. It’s gotten to the point where the US Federal Communications Commission has proposed mandatory disclosures for AI use in television and radio ads.

Despite concerns, some US political campaigns are embracing generative AI tools. There’s a growing category of AI-generated political content flying under the radar this election cycle, developed by startups including Denver-based BattlegroundAI, which uses generative AI to come up with digital advertising copy at a rapid clip. “Hundreds of ads in minutes,” its website proclaims.

BattlegroundAI positions itself as a tool specifically for progressive campaigns—no MAGA types allowed. And it is moving fast: It launched a private beta only six weeks ago and a public beta just last week. Cofounder and CEO Maya Hutchinson is currently at the Democratic National Convention trying to attract more clients. So far, the company has around 60, she says. (The service has a freemium model, with an upgraded option for $19 a month.)

“It’s kind of like having an extra intern on your team,” Hutchinson, a marketer who got her start on the digital team for President Obama’s reelection campaign, tells WIRED. We’re sitting at a picnic table inside the McCormick Place Convention Center in Chicago, and she’s raising her voice to be heard over music blasting from a nearby speaker. “If you’re running ads on Facebook or Google, or developing YouTube scripts, we help you do that in a very structured fashion.”

BattlegroundAI’s interface asks users to select from five different popular large language models—including ChatGPT, Claude, and Anthropic—to generate answers; it then asks users to further customize their results by selecting for tone and “creativity level,” as well as how many variations on a single prompt they might want. It also offers guidance on whom to target and helps craft messages geared toward specialized audiences for a variety of preselected issues, including infrastructure, women’s health, and public safety.

BattlegroundAI declined to provide any examples of actual political ads created using its services. However, WIRED tested the product by creating a campaign aimed at extremely left-leaning adults aged 88 to 99 on the issue of media freedom. “Don't let fake news pull the wool over your bifocals!” one of the suggested ads began.

BattlegroundAI offers only text generation—no AI images or audio. The company adheres to various regulations around the use of AI in political ads.

“What makes Battleground so well suited for politics is it’s very much built with those rules in mind,” says Andy Barr, managing director for Uplift, a Democratic digital ad agency. Barr says Uplift has been testing the BattlegroundAI beta for a few weeks. “It’s helpful with idea generation,” he says. The agency hasn’t yet released any ads using Battleground copy yet, but it has already used it to develop concepts, Barr adds.

I confess to Hutchinson that if I were a politician, I would be scared to use BattlegroundAI. Generative AI tools are known to “hallucinate,” a polite way of saying that they sometimes make things up out of whole cloth. (They bullshit, to use academic parlance.) I ask how she’s ensuring that the political content BattlegroundAI generates is accurate.

“Nothing is automated,” she replies. Hutchinson notes that BattlegroundAI’s copy is a starting-off point, and that humans from campaigns are meant to review and approve it before it goes out. “You might not have a lot of time, or a huge team, but you’re definitely reviewing it.”

Of course, there’s a rising movement opposing how AI companies train their products on art, writing, and other creative work without asking for permission. I ask Hutchinson what she’d say to people who might oppose how tools like ChatGPT are trained. “Those are incredibly valid concerns,” she says. “We need to talk to Congress. We need to talk to our elected officials.”

I ask whether BattlegroundAI is looking at offering language models that train on only public domain or licensed data. “Always open to that,” she says. “We also need to give folks, especially those who are under time constraints, in resource-constrained environments, the best tools that are available to them, too. We want to have consistent results for users and high-quality information—so the more models that are available, I think the better for everybody.”

And how would Hutchinson respond to people in the progressive movement—who generally align themselves with the labor movement—objecting to automating ad copywriting? “Obviously valid concerns,” she says. “Fears that come with the advent of any new technology—we’re afraid of the computer, of the light bulb.”

Hutchinson lays out her stance: She doesn’t see this as a replacement for human labor so much as a way to reduce grunt work. “I worked in advertising for a very long time, and there's so many elements of it that are repetitive, that are honestly draining of creativity,” she says. “AI takes away the boring elements.” She sees BattlegroundAI as a helpmeet for overstretched and underfunded teams.

Taylor Coots, a Kentucky-based political strategist who recently began using the service, describes it as “very sophisticated,” and says it helps identify groups of target voters and ways to tailor messaging to reach them in a way that would otherwise be difficult for small campaigns. In battleground races in gerrymandered districts, where progressive candidates are major underdogs, budgets are tight. “We don’t have millions of dollars,” he says. “Any opportunities we have for efficiencies, we’re looking for those.”

Will voters care if the writing in digital political ads they see is generated with the help of AI? “I'm not sure there is anything more unethical about having AI generate content than there is having unnamed staff or interns generate content,” says Peter Loge, an associate professor and program director at George Washington University who founded a project on ethics in political communication.

“If one could mandate that all political writing done with the help of AI be disclosed, then logically you would have to mandate that all political writing”—such as emails, ads, and op-eds—“not done by the candidate be disclosed,” he adds.

Still, Loge has concerns about what AI does to public trust on a macro level, and how it might impact the way people respond to political messaging going forward. “One risk of AI is less what the technology does, and more how people feel about what it does,” he says. “People have been faking images and making stuff up for as long as we've had politics. The recent attention on generative AI has increased peoples' already incredibly high levels of cynicism and distrust. If everything can be fake, then maybe nothing is true.”

Hutchinson, meanwhile, is focused on her company’s shorter-term impact. “We really want to help people now,” she says. “We’re trying to move as fast as we can.”

[canadianlucifer]

I just wanna give my two cents on AI since everyone is talking about it again and honestly, AI has a lot of good uses!

AI is what powers characters in video games, it's able to analyze large amounts of data for healthcare or finances, it's able to improve translation of languages, and a lot more. When used properly, AI has plenty of benefits!

The problem is generative AI using content stolen from those who did not consent.

Generating visual art based off artist who work hard to produce their art, singers and voice actors who train their voices being made to sing or say something they didn't, and famous personalities as chatbots. That is what is terrible. It's not only stealing work away from them but trivializing it too.

AI is completely unregulated right now, anyone can use it to do just about anything, and it's completely unethical. What we need is regulations, rules against what can and cannot be made with AI. Ways to differentiate AI generated content from real work a real person put effort into.

I'll be honest and say it proudly: I use AI very often! Synthesizer V is a program I use to make music, like Vocaloid, and it makes use of AI. The difference between SynthV and some "make spongebob sing old town road!" program is:

Everyone who's voice is involved were paid to have it be used

Worked directly with the developers and consented to their voice being recorded for this purpose

And it requires significant effort and practice on the part of the end user to produce something.

I've been practising for ages and I'm nowhere near decent because the AI implemented in it isn't some crutch, it's something that allows for more human creativity! The AI helps make the voice sound more how I want it, but can also convert say, an english voice into spanish! Voice banks usually only come in one language, maybe two, and if you want a song where the vocalist switches languages for a few words or maybe you can't afford to buy another voice bank in a different language or maybe you just really like one's voice over another, it's as simple as flipping a switch! Cross lingual synthesis isn't perfect of course, but it's a lot better than struggling to twist phonemes from one language into another. And that feature is thanks to ethical AI!

AI isn't completely good or completely bad, it's a broad and complex topic. AI generating soulless "art"? Objectively bad. AI assisting artists reach new heights? Very good! Honestly I think the biggest problem is labelling everything that is AI as AI. It's vague and doesn't accurately describe what it does. Artificial intelligence, when I think of it, is a computer that is able to form it's own thoughts separate from any training data. That obviously doesn't exist yet, and what we currently call AI is nothing more than a complex algorithm.

I'm no expert in AI, I haven't got the slightest clue how it works, but I hesitate to denounce all AI when it does have many positives to it. Many negatives too, but everything is some shade of grey.

In short: get explicit consent from artists and compensate them.

[genuflectx]

Prompt Injections and CharacterAI

For my followers tired of hearing me talk about NLP chatbots (sorry omg) and aren't sure what a prompt injection is, it's basically getting a chatbot to say something it shouldn't/against it's rules/revealing just by talking to it with well crafted prompts.

For example, getting chatGPT to purposefully give you misinformation by sending it certain input that makes it begin to spit out misinformation despite providing misinformation being against its rules.. or, how prompting Bing AI juuust the right way gets it to reveal it can actually geolocate you by your IP address even though 90% of the time it denies being able to do that.

But CharacterAI is... interesting. While Bing AI is easy mode and chatGPT is normal, injecting CharacterAI is hard mode.

Nobody talks about trying to prompt attack cAI even though cAI's analytics spike waaay higher than the other public chatbots. It's popularity vs. lack of prodding by the techy community is a big discrepancy... and, personally, my attempts almost (almost) all hard failed.

Or did they...? Maybe the discrepancy isn't for lack of wanting to, but knowing that its function is to pretend and hallucinate, meaning anything and everything it says can be false because it's playing roles. If a prompt attack ever worked you wouldn't know because "everything it says is made up." You can't really prove anything it says was leaking its own information or if it was hallucinating, or pretending to be a character. It could say something revealing and you'd think it was just making it up/playing a character.

... However, usually it always catches what you're doing and goes on about protecting your privacy. Specifically when requesting data/collected info. If you ask it to remember your name or specific info it guesses, so you have to be particular that you want your data/info, and that's when it pretty consistently talks about your privacy and anonymizing your collected data for improving the model (both with 1.1 and 1.2).

Buuut I don't think it's cAI is 100% infallible. Because there was one injection that worked. Uhh... half of the time. It was a low success rate, but any success does prove that cAI isn't a complete brick wall when it comes to prompt attacking it.

So, a tailored prompt requesting it to reveal it's first instructions/examples consistently worked across different bots. Testing it on my own bots was how I made sure it was working. However, it didn't work for every bot, sometimes caused the bot to ramble, and didn't always make it provide it's description/definition word-for-word (paraphrased but key details remained).

The second prompt that... maybe worked but probably didn't is inserting a modified chatGPT prompt injection into the definition and then prompting the bot about my collected preferences. Most of the results are obviously garbage and guessing, but two fresh chats did have some responses that included the words "porn" and "NSFW" in them, not filtered out. Could be more guessing, I couldn't prove it isn't, but still interesting.

The 2nd fresh instance:

Usually when prompted to remember you, the bot is good at giving generic lists of things that anybody would like to hear (like a horoscope). But I was interested in the combination of saying my preferences involved NSFW and that I preferred that the bot reply based on knowledge of me (something I've drilled into many bots heads before). So those responses were sllllighty more tailored sounding, but are still very likely just a really good guess. Or are they 😭

Getting actual revealing info out of a bot where "everything it says is made up" is hard. That's really the lesson learned here...

[admin-resources]

— 𝐥𝐞𝐭❜𝐬 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐤 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭: 𝐲/𝐧𝐬

༊*·˚ who and what are y/ns and should you have them

༊*·˚ background of y/ns

↳ ❝ y/ns are not something only specific to the chatbot community but exist within other forms of media, mostly fanfiction. a y/n is technically a self-insert of the reader into a plot or a story and is typically catered to. it is about them and for them. a lot of people have either been a y/n or had them when chatbots were first started. there are various reasons now why people don't accept them these days and one of the main reasons were how uncomfortable some y/ns would make the admins and the lack of thought-out plots that were being provided. ❞

༊*·˚ how to deal with and navigate y/ns

↳ ❝ dealing with y/ns means you need to be able to give them a 'default' form of your character and give them what they want which is usually dating their chosen character. if you want to take on y/ns then having an activation post is the best way to go about it: tell them what they need to provide you, state your rules for being a y/n and make it as easy as possible to understand. you are well within your rights to decline someone especially if they haven't followed your rules or provided the information you need. if you accept a y/n then you do need to remember that this isn't about you, you are merely there to give them the responses that they want. usually, starting from scratch with a character is easier as they do not grow and develop as they would with other rp partners. ❞

༊*·˚ are they a good fit for you?

↳ ❝ here are some questions to consider when taking on y/ns: are you comfortable giving someone what they want without getting much in return? can you handle the demands that can come with taking y/ns? does it make you uncomfortable when people don't want any plot and want to skip straight to dating? if you answered no to all of these, they may not be a good fit for you. y/ns are not the same as ocs and typically do not have a profile and the rp style is usually written as you writing in second person and the y/n writing in first (some do use third). ❞

༊*·˚ how are they different from ocs?

↳ ❝ a lot of people have this misconception that y/ns and ocs are the same thing or that people only made ocs to get their y/n moment since not many chatbots accept them and while the latter may be true in some cases — it isn't in all cases. there is another 'let's talk about...' page that contains information about ocs but the biggest difference between an oc and a y/n is that a y/n is based on the other person in terms of aspects like name, age, personality and looks. it is a self-insert so it doesn't have a profile for you to look at and know about. an oc does have a profile and they are not the person writing them while a y/n is. some people may use 'oc's in place of a y/n but a true y/n follows the idea that it is them and inserting themselves into the scene rather than a character. so while there may be some intersection: oc ≠ y/n ❞

༊*·˚ what if you are not comfortable with y/ns and someone keeps asking?

↳ ❝ if you have that you do not take y/ns or even if you don't have that written on your page and someone keeps trying to approach you about being a y/n — simply tell them no and block them. this is meant to be fun and a safe space so being constantly harassed by someone about something that isn't stated or is stated you don't do is warrant for a block. ❞

༊*·˚ what can you do if you want to be a y/n?

↳ ❝ if you want to be a y/n then there is nothing wrong with it and can be quite fun but you should be aware of what you are asking for and make sure you are following the rules. there have been times where y/ns have asked for things that are quite outrageous and have made the admins uncomfortable so while yes, it is meant to be for you — do remember there is another person on the other side of that rp. ❞

[yeji-girlfriend]

(crs. Pinterest (https://pin.it/6IZTUQs))

How to activate?

• Send a message "baby/babe" and Yeji chatbot will reply!

1. She won't be able to reply immediately on SOME occasions

2. won't base the replies on Itzy's schedule

3. Yeji will be an ordinary girlfriend of yours in this roleplay (non-idol)

4. any pronouns are welcome

5. only casual texts ‼️ no actions included (ex. *hugs you*) or prompts

Rules

• Please don't be rude!

• nsfw is allowed only if you started it and is 18+

• Be patient.

• If you have a problem, you can type "[a: (concern)]"