#raymond mcneil

[akuma-tenshi]

found a twitter thread of people sending their favourite tumblr posts and it was an absolute goldmine of new content to make into end roll shitposts

gory sprites and spoilers for the entire game under the cut

[twilightguardian]

I love how I sent you a challenge and you just sidestep it. Really shows your integrity there.

I know why you did that. Because you haven't watched any of Raymond's other work. You haven't seen any of his reactions or else you wouldn't ask me to show where he compliments the show or else you'd see it for yourself. I'm not the one making the claims here, bro. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. The claim here being that Raymond is arrogant. You made that claim. I'm saying I don't believe you because that's ludicrous. It's not up to me to defend the guy to someone who is making claims. All I do is say either 'hey, that's bullshit' or ask 'can you show me where?'

You know. Evidence.

Also "Fixing RWBY is his one known writing project" LOL bruh.

“Fixing” RWBY is a disgrace to the show, the creators, and the fans. Yes, the show has issues, as does every piece of media ever, but the so-called fixes consist of making the female characters useless and subservient, adding unnecessary “fan”service elements, turning Roman into a shitty self-insert. Stuff like this is why the fandom and the show as a whole get a bad rap, and won’t get the appreciation and wider attention that it actually deserves.

Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

[kob131]

What’s your thoughts on Arslan’s arc in Fixing RWBY?:

https://www.reddit.com/r/RWBYcritics/comments/13lzuwb/fixing_rwby_v6_ep_19/jlehbke/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&utm_content=1&utm_term=15&context=3

Well, normally I wouldn't even bother because I am not wasting my time on Celtic's 'Fixing' but I see that he's the one referenced here. So sure.

To defend my own writing choice there, this was what I planned to be Arslan's fate back when I retrofitted her character back during Volume 3. 

Sorry Celtic, didn't you hear? Defending your writing choices is attacking your critics and rejecting criticism.

So be a good little creator, take it up the ass and ask for seconds.

It was only after that in which she appeared in.... Before the Dawn, I want to say? She may have gotten a mention in After the Fall, but that was mostly away from Shade as a locale. When I learned she was in the book I was initially irritated, because I like the arc I did for her, but if they did something with her I would be willing to detour. Unfortunately, they... really didn't do anything with her. She, along with 90% of the remaining cast in that book, was completely wasted, so I felt no anxiety in detouring. 

Maybe because we have these things in the real world called 'limitations' and 'restrictions'. I know you like to pretend you could just write an outline, get some shitty sketches and pretend it's an actual product but actual creators have to deal with limitations while producing an actual product.

Considering I've already deviated by killing some characters, maiming others, and having a handful survive when they weren't supposed to, this change wasn't too big to me.

Keep this in mind. It's going to bite him in the ass soon.

As to why I did what I did with her, while the episode's story is squarely on Cinder, this is the conclusion of Arslan's arc... or should I say, her failure to arc.

... No. He didn't do that, did he?

Her life up until Vytal was defined by trying to one-up Pyrrha and earn the respect of those around her as a competent combatant. Her defeat at the tournament (and subsequent fall of Beacon) should have been the moment she self-reflected and found something else to value in her life, but what ended up happening was emotional stagnation. While she became more jaded and tired, as seen in Fixing Volume 5, she still held onto her world view back when she was trying to upstage Pyrrha. Her desire to seek revenge on Cinder may have seemed noble at first glance (partially because Cinder was also involved in Lionheart's death, at least to her knowledge), but in reality it was her way of trying to find closure to her spat with Pyrrha. She wanted to beat the person that killed Pyrrha because by transitive property, she'd be superior to Pyrrha. Unfortunately for her, Pyrrha was markedly outclassed by Cinder, so Arslan had little-to-no-hope of beating her. She let her obsession overtake her and she made several critical flaws that led to her dying as a result. Arslan should be looked at a dark tragedy.

... He did. He fucking did.

Hey Celtic, where did you get such an idea huh? Maybe from, I dunno...

A doctor breaking down a power hungry bitch?

Raymond McNeil.

You didn't GIVE Arslan her own arc. You copy/pasted CINDER'S arc then cut out half of it.

The whole idea of 'I am obsessed and I died because I failed to move on' is what CINDER is going through. That was the whole point of Watts' tearing into Cinder- to get it through her thick skull that she hadn't proven herself worthy of shit. That she was stagnating and stuck repeating her mistakes. And to cement that even if she got better as a villain- she was still a VILLAIN at the end of the day.

And it works with Cinder because this same inability to move on is shared with other villains like Adam and Salem. All of them are stuck in the past, in their own pain, while the heroes move past that and keep fighting. It's a called a 'theme', Raymond. Try analyzing it sometime.

Here, what is the point of Arslan going through this arc? Does it reinforce a theme or idea? Does it set the tone going forward? Is there any kind of parallel between her and her killer?

Going off of what you deemed important enough to mention- No. None of that is the point. Going off what you say later-

As to my overall process, Fixing RWBY is a lot more wholistic in approach than just making nips and tucks, even if I try not to stray too far from things (a solid example is the upping of the number of episodes that I've stuck too since Volume 1). I make changes to characters, lore building, world building and plot structure all the time because I feel like there's more to be squeezed out of those elements than the show even attempted to show (looking forward to actually working on Penny in Volume 7, we have almost too many ideas where to go with her).

Also gotta love the fact that Celtic is claiming he's changing things for the sake of the series while dedicating time to a character that adds nothing and indicates her arc has no real reason to exist. If it connected to the themes of the series- why didn't he mention it? Unless he doesn't think about themes in a heavily THEMATIC show.

There's also the unfortunate factor that as I move along, making even small changes will cause a ripple effect, meaning we have to account for more and more as time progresses. It's just the nature of the beast. I fully expect by the end of the series the two stories will only vaguely resemble each other. Hell, Volume 6 so far has had to account for so much that it already feels insanely different to the original, even while doing our best to keep specific plot points extant. What started as "Let's put some tournament drama in this tournament to put pressure on Pyrrha" evolved into "Arslan can't let go and this leads to her unfortunate demise."

Then you failed Raymond. Because according to you-

Really the heart of it is trying to figure out the story/stories that Miles, Kerry, Monty, (and later) Eddie and Kiersi want to tell with what they present us and then reverse engineering it to get the most mileage possible

You are writing their story.

And here's the thing- you didn't NEED to bring in Arslan. You try to just this by saying that Cinder killing mooks doesn't sell her threat-

That.... was a lot more than I intended to write, but I hope that ramble helps you understand where I'm coming from with the choice made about Arslan. As to your suggestion, I don't feel a simple mook from the Spiders would have served a purpose, plot or character-wise. Cinder is a serious threat, even at her lowest, and this is the moment that affirms that when she's in play, people's lives are on the table (looking at you, V8).

-but your own words imply Arslan has been living in Pyrrha's shadow for years. Hell,your own words about Arslan's death imply as much. If Pyrrha was better than Arslan but lost to Cinder- no shit Arslan was gonna die.

Could have gone the mook route and avoided all this shit with Arslan. But when you're more concerned with getting your dick sucked- guess basic writing skills need to go.

P.S. I find it funny that Raymond tries to take a potshots at V8 for not portraying Cinder as a serious threat when the finale absolutely did...while still emphasizing that she's stil alittle girl looking for control.

Maybe try boxing on your own level next time. I hear first time self insert harem fanfics could use a spell checker.

[no-reference-georg]

2/2

1/2

[iamafanofcartoons]

Regarding the whole black Sun thing I think your criticism is kind of bad especially when it comes to you saying find me a black Sun shipper that's blank is also really bad you shouldn't actually categorize All Blacks on shippers as bad because if you're going to go with that argument I can give you loads of evidence on my Twitter Tumblr Facebook Etc showing how god-awful Bumblebee shippers are from death threats to people calling me homophobic telling me that kill myself Etc. Bb shippers too

Let me present exhibit A

Blacksun shipper harassing Kiersi Burkhart.

Exhibit B

Blacksun shippers harassing Bumbleby fans

Exhibit C

RWBY Rewriters hating on Bumbleby and its fans.

Exhibit C part 2

I rest my case.

The blacksun shippers are a toxic community who harass RWBY Fans, CRWBY, and repeatedly speak ill of the show.

Bumbleby fans may not be perfect, may have flaws, but are ultimately far less toxic and problematic than the Blacksun shippers who take advantage of every opportunity to hate on RWBY.

Further example of the toxic blacksun community attacking CRWBY

[gigaguy]

Exposing lies in Canonseeker's anti-Fixing RWBY blog.

Below this link to Canonseeker's blog is a revised repost of my qoute reblog before I was blocked. Despite Canonseeker being made explicitly aware of the very real problems in their blog, they refuse to edit it and have covered it up with reblogs and deletion of messages.

I'm also utilizing Canonseeker's tags (in addition to others) to get this exposed to as many people as possible.

Canonseeker's Blog:

My OG Response Post:

So a lot of these “points” about the Fixing RWBY show are blatantly false, and I’m going to show that with evidence from both the rewrite and the canon RWBY. I won’t be talking about the points that came down to: “this was changed/added and I personally don’t like it so it’s bad,” (which is most of them) as all that is entirely subjective and best saved for direct discussion.

I also noticed that repeats of the exact same points and the FRWBY crew’s own opinions outside of the quality of the rewrite were used to artificially increase the point number, which just comes off as desperate. But anyway here are the points and evidence in no particular order.

"Apparently the artists on the project do not get paid. They work for “exposure”.

False. The artist's VOLUNTEERED for Fixing RWBY because they're interested and enjoy supporting. They were not promised exposure nor is that what they were seeking. Here's it straight from one of the artists themselves.

"Raymond meanwhile repeatedly insults CRWBY and calls himself superior, while claiming that Miles and Kerry deserve no respect from him. Apparently, according to their discord and their youtube channel, loving and respecting RWBY proper makes you a “toxic simp”

Lumping the two of these together because they fall under the same "Phoenix hates everything about canon RWBY" propaganda Canonseeker and their friends are trying to push.

Now unless you think giving criticism AND praise to CRWBY writers is Phoenix saying that they "deserve no respect" from him, than this is another blatant lie.

As for the claim that Phoenix & crew feel that if you enjoy canon RWBY you're a "toxic simp," it REALLY should go without saying that the amount of time and effort the entire team put into Fixing RWBY shows how much they love the show, but here's the words straight from Phoenix once again.

And this.

"One of the artists claim that Yang is a party girl."

Yes because she is and CRWBY agrees, so this shouldn't be a "problem" directed at one of the FRWBY artist's for stating a canon fact.

“Raven is now trash-talking Summer to Yang’s face, calls Vernal worthless, and cuts ties with her tribe at the end of V5… NONE of this is Raven….”

Canon Raven:

Yeah no, all of what OP mentioned minus “cuts ties with the tribe” is canon Raven. And what’s funny is in the rewrite she doesn’t even cut ties with her tribe in the first place.

Skip to 59:30 in the video below.

Shiloh is the one that cuts ties with Raven and makes the tribe leave HER.

Watch. The rewrite. Before making blogs. Please.

Also notice Raven’s face in the image below as she calls Vernal worthless, heck just listen to how her voice breaks up while she’s talking about her. People, don’t let misinterpretations and out of context quotes give you a specific opinion, watch the material yourself.

The WF is no longer a civil rights group, extremist or otherwise.

The WF is literally the same as how Blake explained it to Sun in canon. Go to 10:17 in the video below.

I really don’t understand how someone can just lie about something that is readily available for people to check out themselves at any time.

“Not only is Roman now the protagonist of FRWBY, and given far more screentime than any of the RWBY protagonists”

Here’s a fun challenge for everyone, starting from Fixing RWBY Part 3, (skip the History, Lore and Response videos in the playlist below) scrub through all of the episodes and see how many times Roman shows up compared to the RWBY girls.

Spoiler for the result: Roman is NOT shown more times than the all the RWBY protagonists, not even close. Neither Roman nor any other male characters get an "excessive" amount of screen time compared to the female characters like Canonseeker claimed. And this would be very obvious to anyone that actually watches the series all the way through.

“The entire Brunswick arc in V6? It’s now devoted to Roman.”

Fixing RWBY hasnt even reached Volume 6 yet...it JUST wrapped up Volume 5..(check the playlist).. once again another blatant lie.

“Salem has YET to make an appearance…that is to say, she is discussed, but despite being in v3, v4, and v5, has not been shown in any way shape or form once.”

SHE’S RIGHT THERE. She shows up in the Battle of Haven just as she does in canon! Holy hell man this is embarrassing-

Now as you can see, Canonseeker’s (ironic name) blog is just downright unreliable. They didn’t watch Fixing RWBY, they just either based it entirely on word of mouth from people like the ones they thanked at the end of their blog, or they did watch all of them and just intentionally lied to slander Fixing RWBY. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s the latter given the discussions I’ve had with them directly.

Like I said at the start, I didn’t even talk about most of the things in Canonseekers's blog as I just wanted to expose their notable lies and double standards that can’t be argued one way or the other whatsoever. And trust me, I (and I’m sure a ton of others) have LOTS to say about those other warped and out of context takes, but I’ll just take that to the comments. I just wanted to get this out quickly as to not let something so maliciously dishonest stand on it’s own.

Everyone involved with this should be ashamed to have let this slide, and I highly recommend you make a new one without all the lies Canonseeker.

Remember, it’s perfectly fine to not like Fixing RWBY and express that, but it’s something else entirely to intentionally LIE about it just because YOU don’t like it and don’t want others to watch and like it either.

[gavinom123]

My second piece for Phantasmagoria: An Indie RPG Fanbook, this time for the game END ROLL! Had so much fun including all these little details hehe

[myrystixx]

Hello End Roll community, I came with memes

BONUS

[akuma-tenshi]

nameless town and dreamsend inc. aren't sending their best

[yorushikiori]

Fanart End Roll boys ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)❤

Who want to be loved by these cutie boys?( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)💕💕💕

[dirty-end-roll-confessions-blog]

I regret nothing ~ mod informant

[lilithfairen]

So did you see how Raymond McNeil and The Sketchy Huntsmen team are continuing to rip off RWBY, and accuse RT of copying their ideas?

I have not. Care to elaborate?

[mdsc951]

Happy Birthday Lonette Rita McKee (July 22, 1954) is a film, television and theater actress, music composer, producer, songwriter, screenwriter, and director. McKee is best known for her role as Sister Williams in the original 1976 musical-drama film Sparkle. McKee also had notable roles in such movies as The Cotton Club, Jungle Fever, ATL, and Honey. Her career began in the music business in Detroit as a child prodigy, where she started writing music/lyrics, singing, playing keyboards, and performing at the age of seven. She recorded her first record entitled "Don't Worry About It". It became an instant regional pop/R&B hit. She wrote the title song for the film Quadroon, in which her sister Katherine McKee starred when she was fifteen. She has written and produced three solo LPs. Natural Love was produced for Spike Lee's Columbia 40 Acres and A Mule label in 1992. Ed Hogan, reviewing for AllMusic, wrote, "'Natural Love' shows that the singer/songwriter's muse knows no stylistic bounds. As with her earlier effort, She co-writes all of the songs while sharing production credits with Bryant McNeil, Gene Lake Jr., and labelmate Raymond Jones of State of Art." McKee scored the music for the well-received cable documentary on the Lower Manhattan African Burial Ground, as well as numerous infomercials. She has toured extensively throughout the world singing in concert. She teaches a master acting workshop at Centenary College of New Jersey, where she is an adjunct professor in the Theater Arts department. (at Black Hollywood BCI) https://www.instagram.com/p/CgiXyKcpsRN/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[chocolatte-and-despair]

Endroll ✨

Male Characters

✨ Dogma Toscarina ✨ Russell Seager ✨ Informant ✨ Kantera ✨ Saxon ✨ Tabasa McNeil ✨ Raymond Costa ✨ Walter Bartley

Female Characters

✨ Cody Toscarina ✨ Gardenia Reitman ✨ Mireille Nif ✨ Fairia Adelista ✨ Yumi Bombers ✨ Yue

[iamafanofcartoons]

One of the problems with "fixing" rwby is that some of the idea could make funny/interesting fics, like Raven getting kicked out of her tribe(potentially interesting) or Ozpin ending up with roman after he dies(imagine the comedy shenanigans possible), like I could see myself reading a fic that focuses on one of those things and enjoying myself, but instead of just saying it's a canon divergent fanfic, instead he says it's "fixing rwby" which is incredibly snobbish.

Its not even the snobbishness, which of course people like Judgmental Critter praise due to her hatred of Oscar.

Its the sheer sexism, cliches,

Character bloat that 10X the size of RWBY,

The obsessive focus and dedication to male characters over female characters,

The dedication to making female characters hated or injured

The desire to justify any bad actions made by male characters

"Draco in Leather Pants" TV Trope focus

"Ron Weasley is a death eater" TV Trope focus

Oversexualizing themes and characters

Romanticizing a sexual predator (Shay D. Mann) and making him a father, husband, and stepfather.

Trying to make every single villain "morally grey" while making the heroes hated.

Making male villains into protagonists and female protagonists into sidekicks.

Comedy consists of insulting women's chests and men's faces.

Removing POC characters and replacing them with white characters.

Making sure multiple women get killed off.

Defending racist bullies and pushing for friendship between male bullies and their female victims.

Having friends fight each other for petty reasons?

Everyone is related now?

Dictators like Ironwood are now humanitarians?

Ozpin is now as manipulative as Albus Dumbledore in badly written Harry Potter fanfics?

Celtic Phoenix Has QUITE the obsession.

Its ridiculous....

They make women into alcoholics and make them FAR less interesting.

They have...just look.

Men and women looked at this man, who tries to sexually harass a woman...and think...Let's make him that girl's stepfather, have him marry her mother , and give her a second half-sister....and then kick her mom out of the tribe she left...for plot.

And they call that fixing RWBY....oh, and they call him Shiloh instead of Shay D. Mann...because if you're going to make a "Fixing RWBY" show with "Faunus heat cycles" and "girls in bath scenes"...you better make creeps like this have a different name.

The fact that people enjoy this would be disturbing...but Redo of Healer is considered a popular show...that shows how disgusting the members of "Sketchy Huntsmen are."

Did I ever mention that they keep salem from appearing in v3, v4, and v5 till the very end? And they basically design her, the queen of grimm, with a bellydancer outfit.

Because if you're drawing a woman in a fix-it fanfic, you gotta sexualize her for the sake of your viewers who accuse LGBT ships of being fanservice.

There is no fix-it fanfic in rwby that isn't a piece of garbage.

[schattenkino-der-postmotten]

SCHATTENKINO FÜR POSTMOTTEN

Alexander Wilson, Aesthesis and Perceptronium: On the Entanglement of Sensation, Cognition, and Matter, University of Minnesota Press

Anil Bhatti, Dorothee Kimmich, Albrecht Koschorke, Rudolf Schlögl, Jürgen Wertheimer, Ähnlichkeit, Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur

Arthur Kroker, Body Drift: Butler, Hayles, Haraway, University of Minnesota Press

Augusto Monterroso, Das Schwarze Schaf und andere Fabeln

Bernd Flessner, Nach dem Menschen: Der Mythos einer zweiten Schöpfung und das Entstehen einer posthumanen Kultur, Rombach

Bruce Clarke, Gaian Systems: Lynn Margulis, Neocybernetics, and the End of the Anthropocene, University of Minnesota Press

Bruce Clarke, Neocybernetics and Narrative, University of Minnesota Press

Carsten Strathausen, Bioaesthetics: Making Sense of Life in Science and the Arts, University of Minnesota Press

Cary Wolfe, What Is Posthumanism?, University of Minnesota Press

Catherine Bell, Performing Animality

Constance Classen, Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and Across Cultures, Routledge

Cora Diamond, Fleisch essen und Menschen essen

Daniel S. Traber, Whiteness, Otherness and the Individualism Paradox From Huck to Punk, Palgrave Macmillan

David Cecchetto, Humanesis: Sound and Technological Posthumanism, University of Minnesota Press

David Farrier, Anthropocene Poetics: Deep Time, Sacrifice Zones, and Extinction, University of Minnesota Press

David Wills, Inanimation: Theories of Inorganic Life, University of Minnesota Press

David Wills, Dorsality: Thinking Back Through Technology and Politics, University of Minnesota Press

David Wood, Thinking Plant Animal Human: Encounters With Communities of Difference, University of Minnesota Press

Davide Tarizzo, Life: A Modern Invention, University of Minnesota Press

Debashish Banerji, Makarand R. Paranjape, Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, Springer

Diana Walsh Pasulka, Michael Bess, Posthumanism: An Introductory Handbook, Macmillan

Dominic Pettman, Creaturely Love: How Desire Makes Us More and Less Than Human, University of Minnesota Press

Dominic Pettman, Human Error: Species-Being and Media Machines, University of Minnesota Press

Donna J. Haraway, Die Neuerfindung der Natur: Primaten, Cyborgs und Frauen, Campus-Verlag

Donna J. Haraway, When Species Meet, University of Minnesota Press

Donna J. Haraway, Cary Wolfe, Manifestly Haraway, University of Minnesota Press

Drew Ayers, Spectacular Posthumanism: The Digital Vernacular of Visual Effects, Bloomsbury Academic

Edwina Ashton, Steve Baker, The Salon of Becoming-Animal, New York University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Élisabeth Fontenay, Without Offending Humans, University of Minnesota Press

Elizabeth Grosz, Animal Sex: Libido as Desire and Death, Routledge

Erik Hannerz, Performing Punk, Palgrave Macmillan

Erika Cudworth, Stephen Hobden, The Emancipatory Project of Posthumanism, Routledge

Ernst Kapp, Elements of a Philosophy of Technology: On the Evolutionary History of Culture, University of Minnesota Press

Francesca Ferrando, Philosophical Posthumanism, Bloomsbury Publishing

Gilbert Simondon, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, University of Minnesota Press

Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, Tausend Plateaus. Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie, Merve Verlag

Giovnni Aloi, Deleuzian

Glemens-Garl Härle, Karten zu Tausend Plateaus, Merve Verlag

Ian Bogost, Alien Phenomenology, Or, What It's Like to Be a Thing, University of Minnesota Press

Ilya Prigogine, Isabelle Stengers, Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue With Nature, Bantam New Age Books

Indra Sinha, Menschentier, Edition Büchergilde

Isabelle Stengers, Thinking With Whitehead a Free and Wild Creation of Concepts, Harvard University Press

Isabelle Stengers, Cosmopolitics I, University of Minnesota Press

Isabelle Stengers, Cosmopolitics II, University of Minnesota Press

Jacques Derrida, Ned Lukacher, Cinders, University of Minnesota Press

Jakob von Uexküll, A Foray Into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning, University of Minnesota Press

Jamie Lorimer, The Probiotic Planet: Using Life to Manage Life, University of Minnesota Press

Joey Keithley, Jack Rabid, I, Shithead: A Life in Punk, Arsenal Pulp Press

John Ó Maoilearca, All Thoughts Are Equal: Laruelle and Nonhuman Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press

John Protevi, Political Affect, University of Minnesota Press

John Robb, Punk Rock: An Oral History, PM Press

Judith Roof, The Poetics of DNA, University of Minnesota Press

Julian Yates, Of Sheep, Oranges, and Yeast: A Multispecies Impression, University of Minnesota Press

Julius Zimmermann, Die Eigenständigkeit der Dinge

Jussi Parikka, Insect Media: An Archaeology of Animals and Technology, University of Minnesota Press

Kalpana Rahita Seshadri, HumAnimal: Race, Law, Language, University of Minnesota Press

Karen Pinkus, Fuel: A Speculative Dictionary, University of Minnesota Press

Kate Devlin, Turned On: Science, Sex and Robots, Bloomsbury Sigma

Kathy High, I offer my power in the service of love

Laura Erickson-Schroth, Trans Bodies, Trans Selves: A Resource for the Transgender Community, Oxford University Press

Laurent Dubreuil, The Intellective Space: Thinking Beyond Cognition, University of Minnesota Press

Laurent Dubreuil, Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, Dialogues on the Human Ape, University of Minnesota Press

Legs McNeil & Gillian McCain, Please Kill Me: The Uncensored Oral History of Punk, Grove/Atlantic, Inc.

Lutz Dammbeck, DAS NETZ - Die Konstruktion des Unabombers & Das "Unabomber-Manifest": Die Industrielle Gesellschaft und ihre Zukunft: Nautlius Flugschrift, Edition Nautilus

Mads Rosendahl Thomsen, The Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism, Bloomsbury Academic

Marcel O'Gorman, Necromedia, University of Minnesota Press

María Puig de La Bellacasa, Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds, University of Minnesota Press

Martin Kurthen, Robert Payne, White and Black Posthumanism: After Consciousness and the Unconscious, Springer

Matthew Fuller, Olga Goriunova, Bleak Joys: Aesthetics of Ecology and Impossibility, University of Minnesota Press

Michael Hauskeller, Curtis D. Carbonell, Thomas D. Philbeck, The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, Palgrave Macmillan

Michael Haworth, Neurotechnology and the End of Finitude, University of Minnesota Press

Michel Serres, The Parasite, University of Minnesota Press

Mick Smith, Against Ecological Sovereignty, University of Minnesota Press

Mickey Weems, The Fierce Tribe: Masculine Identity and Performance in the Circuit, University press of Colorado

Neil H. Kessler, Ontology and Closeness in Human-Nature Relationships: Beyond Dualisms, Materialism and Posthumanism, Springer

ngbk, Tier-werden, Mensch-werden

Nicole Shukin, Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times, University of Minnesota Press

Nigel Rothfels, Representing Animals, Indiana University Press

Oliver Krüger, Die Vervollkommnung des Menschen, E-Pub

Peter Atterton & Matthew Calarco, Animal Philosophy, Ethics and Identity: Essential Readings in Continental Thought, Continuum

Peter Mahon, Posthumanism: A Guide for the Perplexed, Bloomsbury Academic

Phillip Thurtle, Biology in the Grid: Graphic Design and the Envisioning of Life, University of Minnesota Press

Raymond Ruyer, Neofinalism, University of Minnesota Press

Riccardo Campa, Humans and Automata: A Social Study of Robotics, Peter Lang

Roberto Esposito, Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press

Roger F. Cook, Postcinematic Vision: The Coevolution of Moving-Image Media and the Spectator, University of Minnesota Press

Ron Broglio, Surface Encounters: Thinking With Animals and Art, University of Minnesota Press

Siegfried Zielinski, Variations on Media Thinking, University of Minnesota Press

Stanislaw Lem, Sterntagebücher

Stefan Lorenz Sorgner, Branka-Rista Jovanovic, Evolution and the Future: Anthropology, Ethics, Religion- in Cooperation With Nikola Grimm, Peter Lang

Steve Baker, Artist Animal, University of Minnesota Press

Steven Shaviro, The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism, University of Minnesota Press

Susan McHugh, Animal Stories: Narrating Across Species Lines, University of Minnesota Press

Thierry Bardini, Junkware, University of Minnesota Press

Timothy C. Campbell, Improper Life: Technology and Biopolitics From Heidegger to Agamben, University of Minnesota Press

Timothy Campbell, Adam Sitze, Biopolitics: A Reader, Duke University Press

Timothy Morton, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World, University of Minnesota Press

Tom Tyler, CIFERAE: A Bestiary in Five Fingers, University of Minnesota Press

Vilém Flusser, Rodrigo Maltez Novaes, Vampyroteuthis Infernalis, Atropos Press

Vinciane Despret, What Would Animals Say if We Asked the Right Questions?, University of Minnesota Press