#rawaafid

[ilmtest]

The Best of the Companions

ʿAlī (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “The best of this nation after its Prophet are Abū Bakr and ʿUmar, and if I had wanted I would have told you of the third.” حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ قَالَ: حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي، نا سُفْيَانُ بْنُ عُيَيْنَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ أَبِي جُحَيْفَةَ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ عَلِيًّا يَقُولُ: خَيْرُ هَذِهِ الْأُمَّةِ بَعْدَ نَبِيِّهَا أَبُو بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرُ، وَلَوْ شِئْتُ لَحَدَّثْتُكُمْ بِالثَّالِثِ. Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, Faḍāʾil al-Ṣaḥābah 1/223 #260 أحمد إبن حنبل، فضائل الصحابة ١/٢٢٣ #٢٦٠ https://shamela.ws/book/13136/249 @ilmtest [https://t.me/ilmtest]

[for-thebelievingwomen]

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhali (may Allaah preserve him) said:

”Indeed, the Fitnah of this man (i.e. Sayyid Qutb) and those with him is the Fitnah of this era. It is the severest fitnah in this era because it (falsely) wears the garb of the Salafi Methodology (i.e. falsely attributes itself to Salafiyyah).”

End of Quote- [الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة Vol 1., page 112]

”We say: Yes, he (Sayyid Qutb) is a reviver; rather he is a reviver of every major bidah, (such as) the school of thought of the khawaarij, the rawaafid (shiites), the murji’ah, the jabariyyah and the soofiyyah. He revived all of them, and between us (Salafis) and them (i.e. the followers of Sayyid Qutb) are the books of Sayyid Qutb and his writings (as a witness).

End of Quote- [الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة Vol 1., page 112]

http://www.salaficentre.com/2014/08/fitan-trials-and-tribulations-o-masjid-al-furqaans-admin-shaikh-rabee-reminds-us-why-the-fitnah-of-sayyid-qutb-is-the-greatest-fitna-of-the-era/

[al-jadwal]

Obeying the Scholars Unrestrictedly?

Secondly: Cognizance of the virtue of Islām’s Imāms, their measures, their rights, and their grades, and that their virtue, their knowledge, and their advising is for Allāh and His messenger does not make acceptance of all of what they say and what occurred in their verdicts, from the issues in which what the Messenger came with was hidden to them, incumbent, for they spoke with the extent of their knowledge. The truth [being] contrary to them does not make repudiation of their statements entirely, degradation and defamation of them incumbent. وَالثَّانِي: مَعْرِفَةُ فَضْلِ أَئِمَّةِ الْإِسْلَامِ وَمَقَادِيرِهِمْ وَحُقُوقِهِمْ وَمَرَاتِبِهِمْ، وَأَنَّ فَضْلَهُمْ وَعِلْمَهُمْ وَنُصْحَهُمْ لِلَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ لَا يُوجِبُ قَبُولَ كُلِّ مَا قَالُوهُ، وَمَا وَقَعَ فِي فَتَاوِيهِمْ مِنْ الْمَسَائِلِ الَّتِي خَفِيَ عَلَيْهِمْ فِيهَا مَا جَاءَ بِهِ الرَّسُولُ فَقَالُوا بِمَبْلَغِ عِلْمِهِمْ وَالْحَقُّ فِي خِلَافِهَا لَا يُوجِبُ إطْرَاحَ أَقْوَال��هِمْ جُمْلَةً وَتَنَقُّصَهُمْ وَالْوَقِيعَةَ فِيهِمْ؛ These two extremities deviate from the goal, and the goal of the path is between them [both]. We do not accuse [people] of inequity nor do we render [them] immune [from error]. With them, we do not traverse the Rāfiḍah’s path with regards to ‘Alī, nor their path with regards to the two Shaikhs. Rather, [with them], we traverse their own path with regards to whoever is before them from the Companions, for surely, they do not accuse them of inequity, nor do they render them immune [from error], and they do not accept all of their statements nor do they relinquish them. فَهَذَانِ طَرَفَانِ جَائِرَانِ عَنْ الْقَصْدِ، وَقَصْدُ السَّبِيلِ بَيْنَهُمَا، فَلَا نُؤَثِّمُ وَلَا نَعْصِمُ، وَلَا نَسْلُكُ بِهِمْ مَسْلَكَ الرَّافِضَةِ فِي عَلِيٍّ وَلَا مَسْلَكَهُمْ فِي الشَّيْخَيْنِ، بَلْ نَسْلُكُ مَسْلَكَهُمْ أَنْفُسَهُمْ فِيمَنْ قَبْلَهُمْ مِنْ الصَّحَابَةِ، فَإِنَّهُمْ لَا يُؤَثِّمُونَهُمْ وَلَا يَعْصِمُونَهُمْ، وَلَا يَقْبَلُونَ كُلَّ أَقْوَالِهِمْ وَلَا يُهْدِرُونَهَا. So how do they rebuke us regarding the four imams for a path they traverse with regards to the four Caliphs and the rest of the Companions? فَكَيْفَ يُنْكِرُونَ عَلَيْنَا فِي الْأَئِمَّةِ الْأَرْبَعَةِ مَسْلَكًا يَسْلُكُونَهُ هُمْ فِي الْخُلَفَاءِ الْأَرْبَعَةِ وَسَائِرِ الصَّحَابَةِ؟ There is no incompatibility between these two affairs for [the one] whose chest Allāh opened to Islām. They are only incompatible with one of two men: a [person] ignorant of the measure of the imams and their virtue or a [person] ignorant of the reality of the Sharī’ah that Allāh sent His messenger with. وَلَا مُنَافَاةَ بَيْنَ هَذَيْنِ الْأَمْرَيْنِ لِمَنْ شَرَحَ اللَّهُ صَدْرَهُ لِلْإِسْلَامِ، وَإِنَّمَا يَتَنَافَيَانِ عِنْدَ أَحَدِ رَجُلَيْنِ: جَاهِلٍ بِمِقْدَارِ الْأَئِمَّةِ وَفَضْلِهِمْ، أَوْ جَاهِلٍ بِحَقِيقَةِ الشَّرِيعَةِ الَّتِي بَعَثَ اللَّهُ بِهَا رَسُولَهُ، [The one] who has knowledge of the Law and fact knows decisively that an esteemed man who has a righteous involvement in Islām and good effects, and [has] a place with respect to Islām and its people, could [have] a lapse or a mistake happen from him for which he is excused—and even rewarded for his [independent] deliberation. Thus, it is not permissible that he be followed in it, nor is it permissible that his station, his leadership, and his status be relinquished from the hearts of the Muslims. وَمَنْ لَهُ عِلْمٌ بِالشَّرْعِ وَالْوَاقِعِ يَعْلَمُ قَطْعًا أَنَّ الرَّجُلَ الْجَلِيلَ الَّذِي لَهُ فِي الْإِسْلَامِ قَدَمٌ صَالِحٌ وَآثَارٌ حَسَنَةٌ وَهُوَ مِنْ الْإِسْلَامِ وَأَهْلِهِ بِمَكَانٍ قَدْ تَكُونُ مِنْهُ ��لْهَفْوَةُ وَالزَّلَّةُ هُوَ فِيهَا مَعْذُورٌ بَلْ وَمَأْجُورٌ لِاجْتِهَادِهِ؛ فَلَا يَجُوزُ أَنْ يُتْبَعَ فِيهَا، وَلَا يَجُوزُ أَنْ تُهْدَرَ مَكَانَتُهُ وَإِمَامَتُهُ وَمَنْزِلَتُهُ مِنْ قُلُوبِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ. Ibn al-Qayyim, Iʿlām al-Muwaqqʿīn ʿan Rabb al-ʿĀlamīn 3/220 ابن القيم، إعلام الموقعين عن رب العالمين ٣/٢٢٠ http://shamela.ws/browse.php/book-11496/page-816 Website: https://www.al-jadwal.com Facebook: https://facebook.com/aljadwal1 Instagram: https://instagram.com/al_jadwal Telegram: https://t.me/aljadwal Tumblr: https://al-jadwal.tumblr.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/al_jadwal

[liesexposer]

🚫 The Devil’s Deception Of The RAAFIDAH SHEE’AH & Jamiati Mullahs that call them "Brothers" 🚫 Asghar Ali Mahdi, so called "Ameer" of jamiat alHind says:SHIA-SUNNI BHAI-BHAI HE!!!! "The reality is that the differences between Ahlus-Sunnahand the Raafidah Shee’ah are in the fundamentals of belief and ‘aqeedah. The Rawaafid have idolatrous beliefs that exit them from Islaam. They have in their doctrine Shirk and Kufr that clearly removes a person from the fold of Islaam. Added to this is their severe hatred and enmity for the Muslims upon the Sunnah that leads them to killing the people of Sunnah and taking their wealth and property, as is witnessed throughout history till this day, and written clearly in their source books." ............ "4. Their Belief Regarding The People Of Sunnah. The Raafidee Shi’ee belief teaches that the wealth of the Sunnee is permissible to take and his blood is permissible to spill. It states in their book, Al-Anwaar an-Nu’maaniyyah of al-Jazaa'iree (2/206-207) that the Ahlus-Sunnah are impure unbelievers by the consensus of the Shi’ite scholars, and are more evil than the Jews and Christians.In some other books it states that it is permissible to kill Ahlus-Sunnah - whom they refer to as Naasibees, because of their [false] belief that the Sunnees hate ‘Alee ibn Abee Taalib (may Allaah be pleased with him). They state that Sunnee can be killed by drowning him, or by crushing him under a wall, or by any other secretive means that leaves the Shi’ite killer undetected. These wicked intentions of the Shi’ites are clearly stated in their books, see: Rijaal al-Kashshee, p. 529, Tahdheeb al-Ahkaam, 1/384, Wasaa’il ash-Shee’ah, 6/340."

Refer: The Devil’s Deception Of The RAAFIDAH SHEE’AH (Pg 2&7)shia.bs/dld.cfm?a=ylsqdz Asghar Ali Video calling Shia Rafidah as Brothers:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQQgIhffVf4

[i-asifeq]

Now Let Us Scrutinize ‘Shia Muslims’ and ‘Devout Muslims’ When Applied to The Shiites By The Deceitful Secularists, And How Do We Deal with The Raafidah!

Shaikh Rabee [hafidhahullaah] was asked: Our Shaikh (may Allaah preserve you); the questioner says: What is the ruling on the common people of the Rawaafid (shia) and how do we deal with them?

Answer: The questioner differentiates between the common people and other than them. This is a good approach. The common people who neither speak ill of the wives of the Messenger of Allaah [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] nor do they make Takfeer of the Sahaabah [radiyallaahu-anhum], nor do they believe that the Qur’aan is distorted; but they have some Rafd [i.e. beliefs of the raafidah] and some hatred for the Sahaabah without making Takfeer of them and what is similar to [these deeds]; then these ones are misguided innovators and we do not declare them disbelievers.

And whoever joins their heretics in pronouncing Takfeer against Muhammad’s [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] Sahaabah; speaking ill of the wives of the Messenger of Allaah [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] and the filthy belief that the Qur��aan has been distorted, and that there is an addition and deficiency in it, then this [person] is a Kaafir [disbeliever]- similar to the disbelievers of the Yahood and Nasaaraa. There is no differentiation between their common people and their scholars [in this affair].

Question: How do we deal with them?

Answer: If dealing with them is with regards to a worldly affair-business transaction and what is similar to that- it is permissible to trade with a Yahoodi, a Nasraani and a Raafidee. However, as for co-operating with them in the affairs of religion, then never. [Allaah (The Most High)] said: [وَلَا تَعَاوَنُواْ عَلَى ٱلۡإِثۡمِ وَٱلۡعُدۡوَٲنِ‌ۚ -Do not help one another in sin and transgression][5:2] Rather their scholars and callers are boycotted and they are warned against. [End of quote]

[Source: الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة . Vol 3. Page: 595]

https://salaficentre.com/2020/08/21/slanderous-headlines-utilised-against-islaam-by-spiteful-and-deceitful-secularists-whilst-describing-the-madness-of-the-shiite-raafidah-heretics-on-the-day-of-aashoorah-and-the-bidah-of-khaarjite-terr/

[sagarparvizali]

What If Shaikhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Saw Situation of Many Amongst Groups of Illegal Partisanship – By Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee

What If Shaikhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Saw Situation of Many Amongst Groups of Illegal Partisanship – By Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy. Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadee Al-Madkhalee [may Allaah preserve him] stated: After speaking about those – amongst the different factions of the Jahmiyah, the Khawaarij, the Rawaafid and the Qadariyyah, and the reason behind such Takfeer – who excommunicate (Muslims) based on falsehood , Shaikhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah [may Allaah have…

[manhajsalafiyyah]

The Reasons Why Ahlus-Sunnah Only Speak Good About The Companions

Shaykhul Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728H) rahimahullaah mentions:

And from the fundamental principles of the People of the Sunnah and the Jamaa’ah is Salaamah (the soundness and protection) of their hearts and tongues regarding the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (ﷺ). And they dissociate and free themselves from the way of the Rawaafid (Shiites) who hate Companions and revile them. And they withhold from delving into what occurred between the Companions, and they say: ‘Indeed those narrations which are related concerning their shortcomings, then from them are those that are outright lies, and from them are those that are added to, omitted and changed from the true reality. Whilst they (the companions) had many virtues and previous good deeds (of being from the first and foremost ones to accept Islaam) which obligates their pardon from that which may have occurred from them, if indeed it did occur. Nevertheless, they have been pardoned for faults which those after them will not be pardoned. So even if anyone of them fell into sinning, then it is possible that he may have repented from it, or observed good deeds that have wiped it (all) out. Or he has been pardoned due to the virtue and excellence of having precedence (in the Deen), or by intercession of Muhammad (ﷺ) for which they are the most deserving of people. Or he may have been tested with a trial in this worldly life by which he has been expiated. If this is the case with actual faults and sins, then how about affairs in which they made Ijtihaad (making a judgement after much striving and research). If they were correct then they will receive two rewards and if they erred then they will receive a single reward and the error is pardoned.

Translated by: Aboo ‘Abdillaah Bilal Hussain al-Kashmiree

Reference: Al-'Aqeedatul-Waasitiyyah (no.26-28) & al-Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (3/152-155) with some abridgement

[saeed1921]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most merciful, The Bestower of Mercy Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhalee [may Allaah preserve him] said: By Allaah! Islaam and the Muslims are not ruined except by these type of [people] amongst the people of bidah and misguidance-the khawaarij and those similar to them, and those who are worse such as the Rawaafid. The rawaafid are worse than the khawaarij, and Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon (Ref1) ally with them and say: “They [rawaafid] are our brothers; the differing between us and them is like the differing between [Imaam] Maalik and [Imaam] Shaafi’ee- Meaning: The differing between us [i.e. Ikhwaan Muslimoon] and them [i.e. rawaafid Shiites] is based on ijtihaad. If Imaam [Maalik] and [Imaam] Shafee’ee differ in [some] affairs, they are all rewarded. And if we [ikhwaan al-muslimoon] differ with the rawaafid shiites, then us and them are rewarded. O deceivers! [i.e. Ikhwaanis] The rawaafid revile the Sahaabah and declare them disbelievers; they revile the wives of the Messenger [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam]; they say that the Qur’aan is distorted; they have shir’kiyyaat [i.e. beliefs, views and acts of major polytheism] and they deify the leaders of the Prophet’s family. So does all of this not harm them [i.e. harm their claim to Islaam]? Is this not irjaa?! [i.e. O Ikhwaanis! Is this alliance of yours with the rawaafid and your claim that the differing between you and them is like the differing between Imaams Maalik and Shaafi’ee not Ir’jaa?!(Ref 2)] [Source: الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة للإمام المحدث أبي بكر محمد بن الحسين الآجري  pages: Page: 162]

[jesuisdesolee]

Firstly, by the permission of the Almighty, a reminder:

Imaam Ibn Seereen (rahimahullaah) said: 'Indeed, This knowledge Is Deen, So Look To The One You Take Your Deen From'

If anyone has been recommended any writings by Sayyid Qutb or has read his writings, I think it would be good to share some information on this author that benefitted myself and may in shaa Allaah be a benefit to whoever may stumble across this, may Allaah grant us all success and have mercy on all the believers.

Note: this has been copied and pasted from an article; the full of which can be found in the link provided at the end of the post.

Clarification Regarding Mistakes and Innovations of Sayyid Qutb:

His rebuke and censure of the Prophet of Allaah, Moosaa (alaihis-salaam) and making him the object of ridicule. Sayyid Qutb said, in at-Tasweer al-Fannee fil-Qur'aan: "Let us take Moosaa - he is the example of the fiery, excitable leader [quotes Qasas 28:15] and here his zealous , excitable spirit appeared, just as his emotions in favour of his nation were shown; but this emotional impulse quickly passed away - and he regained his composure - and this is what happens with the excitable folk. [Quotes Qasas 28:15-17, 18] - and this change shows a well-known manifestation, that of one who is afraid, distressed and expecting evil in every moment - and this is also the sign of the excitable (folk). Then along with this and along with the fact that he promissed that he would not aid the wrongdoers - then let us see what he did [quotes Qasas 28:18]. He desired to attack the other man just as he did the day before, and his zeal and emotion led him to forget his having sought forgiveness, his regret, his fear and his anxious watchfulness... So let us leave him here, to meet him again, at a second period in his life, ten years later. So perhaps he had calmed down and became a man who was of calm nature and gentle-natured. No indeed! So here he was, being called from the right hand side of the mountain: that he should throw down his staff, so he threw it down and it became a snake - moving quickly, he hardly saw it before he jumped and ran, not looking back and not turning aside... he was the same highly strung youth... ..."

His rebuke and censure of the Companions of Allaah's Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) , especially Uthmaan (radiallaahu anhu). [The way of the Rawaafid] On this issue he was corrected and refuted by Mahmood Shaakir in his lifetime but he maintained his position and did not recant. His refusal is in the magazine ar-Risaalah vol 977 in the year 1952. This was after Mahmood Shaakir wrote four treatise against him the titles of three of them being: hukmun bilaa bayyinah, laa tasubboo ashaabee, al-alsinatu al-muftireen. They were published in the magazine al-Muslimoon starting in Muharram of the year 1372 hijri. In spite of this he still allowed the book 'Al-Adaalat ul-Ijtimaa'iyyah' to be published before his death.

He said in the aforementioned book for example: "Indeed, it was a truly a trial that Alee was not the third of the Rightly Guided Caliphs" (p.191 5th edn & p.162 12th edn.) "And we tend to the opinion that the khilaafah of Alee was the natural extension of the khilaafah of the two shaikhs [i.e. Abu Bakr and Umar] and that the era of Uthmaan was merely a gap in between" (p.206 5th edn.) "And it is unfortunate that the khilaafah came to Uthmaan when he was an old man; his determination had weakened and did not reach the goals intended by Islaam; and his resolve was too weak to steadfastly face the plots of Marwaan and plots of Umayyah beyond that." (p.186 5th edn.) "The Companions saw this deviation from the spirit of Islaam, and would call one another to al-Madeenah to save Islaam and to save Islaam from the trial; and the khalifah - in his old age, and his state brought about by advanced age - did not possess control of his affair to the expense of Marwaan. It is difficult to accuse the spirit of Islaam in the person of Islaam, but it is likewise difficult to pardon him for the error of the unfortunate occurrence of his taking the khilaafah whilst he was a weakened old man, who was surrounded by evil courtiers from Banu Umayyah..." (p.189 5th edn and its meaning is on p.161 of the 12th edn.)

His declaration of all societies to be disbelievers without exception. [The way of the Khawaarij]

And this is confirmed by Yoosuf al-Qardaawi in his book - The Priorities of the Islamic Movement (p.110) where he explains that the books of Sayyid Qutb appeared in which Qutb performs takfeer of all societies and in which he announces a destructive jihaad against the whole of mankind.

His saying that the Qur'aan is created. [The saying of the Jahmiyyah].

His saying that existence is one (wahdatul wujood). [The way of the Soofiyyah]

In his explanations of Surah Ikhlaas and also the beginning of Surah Hashr. He said, for example, in his Zilaal (6/4002): "Verily it is a single existence, and there is no other reality save that of His, and there is no true and real existence save His - and every other existing thing then its existence is an extension of His existence ... and when this perception becomes firmly established, the one which sees nothing in existence except the reality of Allaah..."

And in some of his other books, Sayyid Qutb affirms this and also praises the Soofees and their actions

He said in his Zilaal (6/3291): "And there are a people who worship Allaah, because they thank him for His favours which they cannot count - and behind this worship, they do not look for Paradise or Hellfire, nor to pleasure or punishment at all..."

His saying of the divine indwelling (hulool) and also Jabr (mankind having no free will - being compelled to act). [The way of the Jabariyyah].

His denial of some of the Attributes of Allaah in the way and style of the Jahmiyyah. [The way of the Mu'attilah]

For example his denial of Istiwaa by explaining it away - that it is merely an allegorical expression as he said in his Zilaal (3/1762) and also in many other places such as: (1/53), (/1/54), (3/1296), (4/2045), (5/2807)

And likewise his denial of the Meezaan (Scales) in the way and style of the Jahmiyyah (4/2481)

His attacks on the Miracles of the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) .

His refusal of the acceptance of ahaad hadeeth in matters of Aqeedah. [The way of the Mu'tazilah]

He said in his Zilaal (6/4008): "And the Aahaad hadeeth are not to be taken in the matters of aqeedah, the source is the Qur'aan - and something being mutawaatir is a condition [that has to be fulfilled] in accepting hadeeth in the issues of belief..." And in this he is more astray than the Ash'arees

His denial of the magic that was practiced upon the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam)

His denial that Eesaa (as) was raised to the heaven

His claim that the point of dispute between the Messenger and the Pagans was with respect to Tawheed ur-Ruboobiyyah only and that Tawheed ul-Uloohiyyah is but Tawheed ur-Ruboobiyyah.

He said in his Zilaal (4/1846): "Then the issue of Uloohiyyah was not the point of difference, indeed, it was the issue of Ruboobiyyah which the messages (of the Messengers) addressed. And this was what the final message was addressing also."

His claim that the Sifaat (Attributes of Allaah) are but mere imaginations (takhyeel).

And for those who call for Haakimiyyah and raise its banner high, then it is well known to the lowest student of knowledge that the Haakimiyyah of Allaah Azzawajall applies even more so to His Essence, His Names and Attributes [as well as His Sharee'ah etc.] So the one who does not judge - in the matters related to knowledge about Allaah - by what Allaah has revealed - then it is more befitting for him to be labelled a rejector of the Haakimiyyah of Allaah Azzawajall. What is required is justice and fair speech and speaking the truth, even if it be against one's own soul - and applying the fundamental principles of Islamic Belief justly and fairly to every individual that they apply to - and this is a sign of a Muslims honesty, integrity and love for the Revelation of Allaah.

His refusal to pray Salaatul-Jumu'ah with the justification that there is no khilaafah at the present time.

Alee Ashmaawee says in his book: "The Secret History of Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen" (at-Taareekh as-Sirree li-Jamaa'atil-Ikhwaan il-Muslimeen): "And the time for the Jumu'ah prayer arrived so I said to him: 'Let us leave and pray' and it was a surprise that I came to know - and for the first time - that he did not used to pray Jumu'ah" (p.112)

His speaking with "Hurriyatul-I'tiqaad" [The Freedom of Belief] - meaning that people can be left upon the religion that they are upon. [So Christians should be left as Christians - Jews as Jews etc...] - Shaikh Ibn Uthaimeen was asked 'What do you say about the one who speaks with Hurriyatul-I'tiqaad?' The Shaikh replied: 'The one who allows Hurriyatul I'tiqaad - that a person can believe in whatever religion he wishes is a Kaafir...'. NOTE: TAKFEER IS NOT BEING MADE HERE - Since even though someone utters something which necessitates disbelief, the conditions have to be fulfilled and the preventive barriers [mawaani'] have to be removed before the verdict of disbelief can be issued and that is for the Ulamaa' alone - BUT THIS IS TO SHOW THE NATURE OF QUTB'S IGNORANCE OF FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES OF THE RELIGION. Shaikh al-Albaanee commented about Qutb that he is merely a writer (adeeb), lacking in Islamic knowledge.

"For Islam does not desire the freedom of worship for its followers only, rather it affirms this right for all the different religions and it tasks the Muslims to fight and defend this right for all people and it [even] allows them to fight under this flag, the flag which guarantees the freedom of worship for the adherents of all other religions...so that it is realised that it is a free world order... (Nahwa Mujtami' Islaamee p.105)

"And Islaam does not feel uneasy about the differences of mankind in aqeedah and manhaj, rather it considers this as something necessitated by natural disposition and a goal from ahgher will in life amongst the people...(Nahwa Mujtami' Islamee p.103)"

His speaking about the Qur'an with mere personal opinion. There are 181 mistakes in matters of aqeedah and issues of knowledge in his Fi zilaal il-Quraan as pointed out by Shaik Abdullaah bin Muhammad as-Dawaish in his book, Al-Mawrid uz-Zilaal fit-Tanbeeh alaa Akhtaa'a az-Zilaal and as the saying goes: Al-Lamsu wal-Basar khairun min as-Sam'i wal-khabr.

For a full and excellent refutation of Sayyid Qutb refer to the following books by the Shaikh Rabee' bin Haadee al-Madkhalee, which have been recommended by Shaikh Ibn Uthaimin, Shaikh Bin Baz and others.

1. Adwaa al-Islaamiyyah alaa Aqeedati Sayyid Qutb

2. Mataa'in Sayyid Qutb fis-Sahaabah

3. Al-Awaasim mimmaa fee kutub Sayyid Qutb minal-Qawaasim

4. Al-Hadd ul-Faasil bainal-Haqq wal-Baatil

After reading these it should become clear to the one who is free from ta'assub and hizbiyyah that Sayyid Qutub is most certainly not a mujaddid, in the league of the likes of Ibn Taymiyyah as is ignorantly propagated by many.

[Source]

[majidblog]

#History_behind_this_Masjid The masjid was built by a Saudi Sheikh ,Rihaala Al Aboody a long time ago.. there were struggles between Rawaafid and Ahl al Hadith for the Masjid and because the Saudi who built it went back to Saudi Arabia .The Rawaafid who were the majority in that area over powered the Sunnis and took the masjid forcefully. But years after one saudi brother who witnessed all of this in New Zealand went back to Saudi Arabia and met a well known sheikh in a wedding.. this sheikh asked him how the community was doing in New Zealand and asked him about the masjid (Masjid Al Noor).. the man told him the story and the sheikh said, subhanallah I’m the one who built that masjid from order of king Fahad and I still have proof and paper work for this.. so the brother was over joyed.. he took the paper work and proof back to Australia and won the masjid back and it was once again taken by the Ahl Al Hadith.. subhanallah (at Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir) https://www.instagram.com/p/BvE2iKBlLX3h-d-1fHiogiZrhmTjgFhqPfFhmU0/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=ytntkgn46r0e

[ilmtest]

The Belief of the Early Shī'ah

Ibn Shawḏab narrates from al-Layth b. Abī Salim who said: “I encountered the early Shīʿah in al-Kūfah. Not a single one of them gave preference to ʿAlī over Abū Bakr and ʿUmar (may Allah be pleased with them all). وقال ابن شوذب، عن ليث، قال: أدركت الشيعة الاولى بالكوفة، وما يفضلون على أبي بكر وعمر أحدا. al-Ḏahabī, Mīzān al-Iʿtidāl 3/421 الذهبي، ميزان الاعتدال ٣/٤٢١ https://shamela.ws/book/1692/1779 @ilmtest [https://t.me/ilmtest]

[3ilm-an-nafi3-blog]

Islaam and the Muslims Are Not Ruined, Except By the Khawaarij and Those Similar to Them…by Shaikh Rabee Bin Haadi

In The Name of Allaah, The Most merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Madkhalee [may Allaah preserve him] said:

By Allaah! Islaam and the Muslims are not ruined except by these type of [people] amongst the people of bidah and misguidance-the khawaarij and those similar to them, and those who are worse such as the Rawaafid.

The rawaafid are worse than the khawaarij, and Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon (Ref1) ally with them and say: “They [rawaafid] are our brothers; the differing between us and them is like the differing between [Imaam] Maalik and [Imaam] Shaafi’ee- Meaning: The differing between us [i.e. Ikhwaan Muslimoon] and them [i.e. rawaafid Shiites] is based on ijtihaad. If Imaam [Maalik] and [Imaam] Shafee’ee differ in [some] affairs, they are all rewarded. And if we [ikhwaan al-muslimoon] differ with the rawaafid shiites, then us and them are rewarded.

O deceivers! [i.e. Ikhwaanis] The rawaafid revile the Sahaabah and declare them disbelievers; they revile the wives of the Messenger [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallaam]; they say that the Qur’aan is distorted; they have shir’kiyyaat [i.e. beliefs, views and acts of major polytheism] and they deify the leaders of the Prophet’s family. So does all of this not harm them [i.e. harm their claim to Islaam]? Is this not irjaa?! [i.e. O Ikhwaanis! Is this alliance of yours with the rawaafid and your claim that the differing between you and them is like the differing between Imaams Maalik and Shaafi’ee not Ir’jaa?!(Ref 2)]

[Source: الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة للإمام المحدث أبي بكر محمد بن الحسين الآجري   pages: Page: 162]

Ref 1: About Ikhwaanis visit: http://www.ikhwanis.com/

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=MNJ&subsecID=mnj18&loadpage=displaysubsection.cfm

Ref 2: Irjaa and the Muji’ah

http://www.salafisounds.com/the-various-factions-of-the-murjiah-and-their-differences-sharhus-sunnah-lesson-by-abu-khadeejah/

http://www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=GSC05&articleID=GSC050003&articlePages=2

http://www.spubs.com/sps/sp.cfm?subsecID=GSC05&articleID=GSC050001&articlePages=1

Translated by the admins of Masjid al-Furqaan, UK.

source: http://masjidfurqan.co.uk/2017/03/24/islaam-and-the-muslims-are-not-ruined-except-by-the-khawaarij-and-those-similar-to-them-by-shaikh-rabee-bin-haadi/

[hanbalee]

The Jews & Christians are better then the Rawaafidh by one characteristic and that is….. It was said to the Jews: Who are the best in your religion? They said, ‘the companions of Mûsa (Moses) alayhissalām. It was said to the Christians: Who are the best in your religion? They said, ‘the companions of Eesaa (Jesus) alayhissalām. It was said to the Raafidhah: Who are the worst people in your religion? They said, ‘the companions of Muhammed sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam’, excluding but a few.’ Amongst the ones they insulted are those many times better than those they included.

(Ibn Abil-’Izz Ibn Abdis-Salaam, Sharh at-Tahaawiyyah, quoted by ash-Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin Al-Abbaad in ‘From the sayings of the trustworthy scholars regarding the Companion, the Khaleefah Mu’aawiyyah Ibn Abee Safwan radi’Allāhu anhu’)

[liesexposer]

Shaikh Fawzaan (may Allaah preserve him) Responds to the Recent Attempted Attack against Makkah Perpetrated by the Hoothi Rawaafid Shiite –An Ally and Proxy of The Raafidah State of Iran

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

Shaikh Saaleh al-Fawzaan says that we should thank Allaah (The Most High) Who repelled the (recent) plot perpetrated by the Hoothi Shiite Raafidah against the Sacred House (i.e. Masjid Al-Haraam) and we should supplicate against them, for indeed they are worthy of punishment. They are not the first people to attack the sacred house, rather the Qaraamitah and likewise Abrahah wanted to destroy the kabah, but Allaah is Ever Watchful Over Them. Allaah [The Most High] stated: [أَلَمْ تَرَ كَيْفَ فَعَلَ رَبُّكَ بِأَصْحَابِ الْفِيلِ – Have you (O Muhammad) not seen how your Lord dealt with the Owners of the Elephant?]

This was about the king of Abyssinia who came along with a huge elephant to destroy the Ka’bah, but Allaah repelled them- Allaah sent them birds in flocks and each bird carried three stones, one in its beak and two in the legs. The birds pelted them with the stones – the stones smashed the skulls of the disbelievers and exited from their anuses, and not a single one of them survived.

Allaah said:

أَلَمۡ تَرَ كَيۡفَ فَعَلَ رَبُّكَ بِأَصۡحَـٰبِ ٱلۡفِيلِ (١) أَلَمۡ يَجۡعَلۡ كَيۡدَهُمۡ فِى تَضۡلِيلٍ۬ (٢) وَأَرۡسَلَ عَلَيۡہِمۡ طَيۡرًا أَبَابِيلَ (٣) تَرۡمِيهِم بِحِجَارَةٍ۬ مِّن سِجِّيلٍ۬ (٤) فَجَعَلَهُمۡ كَعَصۡفٍ۬ مَّأۡڪُولِۭ (٥)

Have you (O Muhammad) not seen how your Lord dealt with the Owners of the Elephant? [The elephant army which came from Yemen under the command of Abrahah Al-Ashram intending to destroy the Ka’bah at Makkah]. Did He not make their plot go astray? And sent against them birds, in flocks, Striking them with stones of Sijjil. And made them like an empty field of stalks (of which the corn has been eaten up by cattle).

This year was called the year of the elephant – the year in which the Messenger of Allah [sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam] was born.

Likewise, what did the Qaraamitah do? They killed the pilgrims at the sacred house and at Arafah. They took the black stone to another place they built and called it a Ka’bah. They placed the black stone in that building and it remained there for more than twenty years until Allaah (willed) that it was to be returned to the Kabah (at Makkkah). This act (i.e. attacking the sacred land) is an act of the Shiites and the Raafidah. These Shiites –Hoothi Shiites- are upon the way of their forefathers and Allaah is Ever Watchful Over Them. [Paraphrased]

Listen to audio here: http://a.top4top.net/m_30259rt21.m4a

http://www.sahab.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=161445

We ask Allaah (The Most High) to destroy the Rawaafid and their allies. Aameen

Source: https://salaficentre.com/2016/10/29/shaikh-fawzaan-may-allaah-preserve-responds-recent-attempted-attack-makkah-perpetrated-hoothi-rawaafid-shiite-ally-proxy-raafidah-state-iran/

[sagarparvizali]

Youth Was Duped By Mainstream Media Before Affair of Proxy War Initiators Was Unveiled – [Jihadists, Rawaafid and Greedy Globalists]

Youth Was Duped By Mainstream Media Before Affair of Proxy War Initiators Was Unveiled – [Jihadists, Rawaafid and Greedy Globalists]

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy. The youth said, “I wish that I was able to physically help repel the aggression of this or that army in the ongoing conflict in Eastern Europe”.  Indeed, this statement can only be expected from a youth who has either been influenced by a teacher or the mainstream media. Therefore, we remind ourselves of the statement of Allaah: يَا…