#quantumgravity | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

itsgerges · 4 days ago

Text

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis (Revised)

Paper 1st hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planet motion energy and Not by the gravitational field- Moreover- the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field -Shortly- the planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy is stored in the space as moving waves – these are the gravitational waves- also the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity

Paper 2nd hypothesis

The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays– Because

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim the sun rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- also –No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states.

Paper 3rd hypothesis

The planets Motions use different rates of time – the rate of time depends on the velocities rate – example- Mercury velocity = 1.6 the Earth velocity because of that (One Second Of Mercury Clock = 1.6 Seconds Of The Earth Clock)

Paper 4th hypothesis

Neptune motion caused to create relativistic effects in the solar system because

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

the new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light-

and the gravitational waves move by speed of light but Neptune caused to decrease the wave speed by 1% and by that the speed be equal 99% of speed of light (=297000 km/s) which caused to created relativistic effects in the solar system- also- Neptune caused to create two wave reflections in the outer planets which one reflection only was enough- means- if Neptune is removed from the solar system the wave reflections in the outer planets will be one reflection only and not two reflections

Paper Main Argument

The Physicist Vision Contradicts The Nature System

I study the solar system Geometry since long years- and- I have found the physicist and astronomer can't understand the solar system designer vision– in fact their vision contradict the designer vision- let's prove that in following

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes that there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the mass (for example) as wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and for that the physicist searched for this (unit) because it's the (unit) by which the wall is building (the mass is building)– this is the physicist thinking direction- he believed there's a small unit by which the great building is built

For that the physicist searched and found the particle and then the particle is divided into Molecules then the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- the unit by which the building is built – or the unit by which the mass is built – for that the physicist divides (any thing) to see its contents till reach to the unit which can be used as the building unit.

The Designer Vision

The designer aims to create integration- as the marriage – male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child

INTEGRATION this is the word inside the designer Mind

No building unit- the marriage answers- because in marriage both (male and female) are required and no one of them better than the other – both work together and give equal effects on the same one process and give together one result- I explain the idea by the marriage because it's easy to understand- I want to put the word (Integration) as the basic concept in the designer mind.

And

I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method

While the physicist divides the elements one after one (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which he considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process

Let's return to the marriage- the marriage requires two players (male and female)- they have different bodies and the process give birth for children- Suppose we remove one player what would happen? (where can we find a woman pregnant by herself?)

I want to say- the division from (matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) destroys the general geometrical design which uses the integration process- let's give other examples

Example No. (1)

Einstein told us (He can't find slightest meaning for the word SPACE) by that he can't define (what's the space) and also he found the space has no mechanical features because no definition causes these features – this is the physicist vision - Let's see the designer vision

Planet moves and its motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and where's the energy? the planet can't store its motion energy inside its body because this energy would raise the planet temperature and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- so- where's the planet motion energy? logically we suppose that- the energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- the planet moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space (as the fish swims in the sea and its motion creates waves in the sea water) similar to that the planet motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space- by that we can define the space and conclude the space nature and features- simply we conclude the space has mechanical features because the energy is stored in the space as moving waves- the gravitational waves prove the space has motion- why we can solve the question which Einstein couldn't solve? Because he supposed the planet is independent from the space- the integration concept is not known by him

Notice

The waves are produced by the planet motion energy are the gravitational waves, the paper first hypothesis proves these waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field also the hypothesis proves the Sun doesn't produce a gravitational field.

More examples are provided after the hypotheses explanations��

PAPER FIRST HYPOTHESIS

Paper first hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (Moreover the sun is not producing a gravitational field) and

The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and (From Uranus to Jupiter) and (from Venus to Mars) –

The gravitational waves reflection causes changes in the planets data- and these changes are repeated with each reflection- means- these changes are found by rules because it's repeated with each reflection clearly- that shows the planets use similar behaviors to create their data which proves one reason causes to create all this data

Also- the wave energy reflection causes to square the wave velocity – the velocity square is the most important feature of the energy reflection because it enables the waves to move by speed of light- that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light in the solar system- the motion by speed of light is produced only by the wave energy reflection (and without the reflection this motion can't be done)

Paper 1st hypothesis (The objective of the hypothesis)

I prove that the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and these waves are reflected in the solar system three time and the reflection of the wave energy causes to square the wave velocity (the velocity squaring is the important feature I prove in the paper because the light beam is reflected but its speed is NOT squared and that means the wave velocity squaring is feature of the space) and it's very important to prove the wave velocity is squared by the reflection because this process enables the waves to move by speed of light and that explains how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light – as this new article states

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- here I explain how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light (please note the article still believes the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field – I refuse this idea – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies but the article states that the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam and I accept this idea and I explain and prove how the gravitational waves can move by speed of light)

Paper 1st hypothesis Proof (The Proving Method)

I compare between the planets data in the three reflections of the wave- I put the planets data in comparison to each other for each reflection to prove the planets use similar behaviors to define their data and this similar behavior proves one force (or one reason) is found behind- and this one reason is the wave energy reflection which causes to create all this data –

The wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design (A Summary)

The reflections cause defined changes in the planets data – and

The most important change is (the wave velocity square) – and this velocity squaring is very important because it enable the gravitational waves to move by speed of light – the motion by speed of light is very effective on the solar system design because it defines the planets distribution between the sun and Pluto– this fact is explained in point no. (**)

Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation and Proof Discussion

The explanation is discussed in two parts

1ST PART

I- Preface

II- The Comparison

III- The explanation of the wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design

2nd PART

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Detailed Discussion

(Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation) 1ST PART

I- Preface

(1)

Planet Motion Energy Analysis

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

(2)

These Waves Are The Gravitational Waves (My Hypothesis)

Mans- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies- these waves are the gravitational waves- it's my paper 1st hypothesis- the gravitational waves are not produced by the gravitational field (moreover the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field) instead the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies

AND

The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND

In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

The 1st Conclusion

The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space

Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves -

Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why?

The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

(3)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-

Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.

(iii)

The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-

(iv)

The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)

Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The 2nd Conclusion

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

(4)

The Wave Reflection Trajectory

Let's remember what we know till now

(a)

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy creates waves in the space and each wave moves by its planet velocity- these waves move toward Pluto (perpendicular on the revolution direction) and in Pluto orbit these waves are unified into one unified wave moves by velocity = the planets velocities total = 205.8 km/s

Means- while the planets revolve around the sun in their orbits by their velocities- there's one unified wave revolves around the sun moving by 205.8 km/s and this unified wave revolves around The Sun In Pluto Orbit-this unified wave is The Gravitational Wave

Now- this unified wave is reflected from Pluto to Venus orbit- Means- the unified wave is reflected and sent from Pluto to Neptune to the next planets till reach Venus

The unified wave is reflected three times in the solar system

(from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and

(from Uranus and Jupiter) and

(from Venus to Mars)

With each reflection of the wave defined changes are done for the planets data

But let's refer to the general design behind these three reflections in following

(b)

We remember this new article

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam-

My hypothesis tells (the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity)

Let's put the ideas beside one another to see the general design

The gravitational waves can move by speed of light AND can produce a light beam – How?? if the motion is done by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) how can this motion produce a light beam? Because the light beam is produced from the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) – here we see the energy reflection effect- the wave moves by speed of light and when this wave is reflected its velocity is squared and produced the value (C^2 = squared speed of light) from which the light beam is created-

Means

The machine needs one reflection to change the speed from (speed of light C=30000 km/s to the value C^2 =squared speed of light) and by that the light beam is created

Now – let's ask -

How can the wave moves by speed of light?

We remember- the one unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves in Pluto orbit with velocity 205.8 km/s – how can this gravitational wave moves by speed of light?

By another reflection of energy – let's see that in following

300000 km/s = (205.8 km/s)^2 x 7.1

This equation tells

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities

(205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s

Means the gravitational wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s

BUT

If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1

Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1

BUT

The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect

The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light)

That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

Here we see clearly that

The machine needs one energy reflection only to accelerate the wave velocity from 205.8 km/s to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

And

The machine needs one more reflection only to change the wave speed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2 =squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Shortly -the machine needs only two reflections of energy to produce the light beam from the gravitational waves motions

Now – let's ask– Why Are There Three Reflections Of Energy In The Solar System? If The Machine Needs Just Two Reflections Why The Machine Uses Three Reflections?

Because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion- Neptune caused to repeat the energy reflection and by that the solar system uses 2 reflections in the outer planets and one reflection in the inner planets- this result is done by Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion – as explained in details in the third hypothesis.

(c)

Please note- the two reflections in the outer planets are done to produce a result of one reflection only and for that the two reflections are complementary one another as we will discuss- shortly- we can say there's one unified reflection of the wave in the outer planets and one single reflection of the wave in the inner planets because the two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and produce a result of one reflection only – spite of that- the planets data prove clearly there are three reflections in the solar system- means- while the wave reflections are three they do effect of two reflections only – as we will discuss in details in following

(5)

The Wave Acceleration Process

Now we know the unified wave velocity is 205.8 km/s and this wave is accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) by one reflection and then this wave moves by speed of light is accelerated one more time to produce the value (C^2= squared speed of light) by another reflection

But where's this happened? In which planets orbits this is happened?

Shortly

The wave moves by 205.8 km/s in the orbits of Planets (Pluto – Neptune and Uranus) and

The wave velocity is accelerated to move by speed of light in Saturn orbit

Means- Starting from Saturn orbit the unified wave moves by speed of light – the wave speed is speed of light in all orbits from Saturn to Venus

And

Venus reflected the wave to Mars and that causes to accelerate the wave velocity from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2= squared speed of light)- in the moon orbit between Venus and Mars

(6)

Planet Definition

(A)

The physics book defines the planet as (Planet is solid body created independently from the space and the other planets)–if so- how can the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data??

My definition for the planet is

Planet is a geometrical point carried on the moving energy (or Planet is a geometrical point found on a light beam) – let's explain this definition in following

The matter and space both are created from the same one energy- means

The planets matters and their distances both are created from the same one energy- the matter and space move depending on the motion of this energy from which they are created-means- the matter isn't moving by the mass gravity – Newton is wrong- the matter moves by the motion of the energy from which the matter is created-

Based on this idea

The space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a geometrical frame (a distinguished form from the space) and moves by a different velocity from the space motion- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish form from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- this explanation shows how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters how is this whirlpool created? and why does its diameter equal = 2 meters? The diameter is created as a result for the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also-

Let's give another example

The energy motion is similar to the blood motion in a creature body- suppose- we examine now a liver of human - the blood motion causes this liver to work perfectly but if the blood motion is changed that would cause changes for the liver cells and job – suppose the blood have some poison the liver will be dead- suppose the pressure is raised- I want to say- the liver is a piece of body (matter) but it depends on the blood motion and this blood motion defines this liver dimensions and data-

Shortly–the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle may be so strong as a rock but it depends on the blood motion (similar to that the matter is found depending on the motion of energy from which this matter is created)

That explains how the gravitational waves reflection have effects on the planets data- still the planet is a solid body and the wave is a wave- the wave can be reflected but the solid body can NOT be reflected spite of that the planets data is reflected one another because the reflected waves have effects on the moving energy by which this planet (solid body) is created-

(B)

We should see the depth of this new definition-

The definition tells us

The matter (planet) is created by energy and the matter moves with this energy- means- this energy is the mother of this matter- this energy created the matter and caused this matter motion-BUT- this definition tells- the matter motion is defined before the matter creation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- How can that be possible? Because –

The energy is found alone in motion (the sea water was in motion) and the energy created the matter and this matter dimensions and data is defined based on the energy motion features (as discussed before- the whirlpool "vortex" is created with diameter 2 meters and this diameter is defined by the water motion features "velocity- pressure- angle- amount …etc") by that the matter dimensions are defined by the mother energy motion features - AND after the matter creation, the matter moves with the mother energy- by that- the created matter moves the same motion based on which this matter dimensions and data is defined- that explains how the planet motion is defined before the planet creation-

This fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because it proves strongly that the planet diameter is created based on its velocity- means- the equation proves – for example – Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s and Neptune velocity is defined before Neptune diameter- let's remember this equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

The Equation Concept (A Summary)

Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result

The designer created the planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved-

(C)

The previous explanation helps us to see how the planet is created- also we remember Kepler rule (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity)

The orbit is created at first and the orbit defines the motion velocity and the planet diameter is created based on this velocity –means- the space is created before the matter creation- Shortly- The planet orbit is created (from the mother energy) before this planet creation and the planet is created later (by this energy motion features) and the planet data is defined based on this motion features and the planet moves after Creation with this mother energy motion- and– in case any planet after creation changes its orbit the planet motion data be changed but its creation data is saved- we should note that the space must be created based on a geometrical design-means- the solar system space (all orbits) is designed based on one geometrical design before any planet creation

(D)

The planet is a geometrical point on the mother energy and moves with it –Or

The planet is a geometrical point on the same light beam and moves with it

That tells

The solar planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam and move with this light beam motion

By that- the planets are similar to carriages in one train –and the light beam (the mother energy) is the engine of this train- the light moves and causes all planets motions (as the sea water moves and causes all ships motions)

Here we conclude that the planets motions are similar to the chess board motions because it depends on geometrical rules in all details- that's why the analysis is so useful because it can show the geometrical design found by the planets motions integration.

(E)

The planet definition answers the question

If The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Why This Reflection Have Effects On The Planets Data?

Because the waves reflection causes to define the energy motion direction and by that the planets data is changed and effected by the moving energy through these planets-

The effects on the planets data is very useful because it proves the reflection is a fact as we discussed later

(7)

The Energy Distribution In The Solar System

Now we know

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s in the orbits of Pluto, Neptune and Uranus and

The unified wave motion is accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) in all planets orbits Starting from Saturn to Venus

And Venus reflected the wave to Mars and by that the speed of light is squared to produce (C^2= squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Can The Wave Different Speeds Have Effect On The Solar System Design? YES

The three planets (Pluto, Neptune and Uranus) have great areas because the wave velocity is 205.8 km/s means massive amounts of energy is stored in these orbits as waves move by 205.8 km/s-

But

Starting from Saturn orbit the wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) that doesn't need great areas because the energy is found in waves move by speed of light that explains why the planets orbits be small orbits (from Saturn to Venus) and even the inner planets have very small orbits because the energy is not stored in the inner planets orbits but the energy is used directly to produce the sun rays- that shows the planets distribution between the Sun and Pluto is related to the wave velocity changes

(8)

Planet Motion Definition

Let's ask

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- now we ask- if the gravitational waves move by speed of light- why is it necessary the gravitational waves move by speed of light relative to the sun point of Space? Or let's ask this question by another method

Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s relative to what? relative to the sun

All Motions In The Solar System Are Done Relative To The Sun – let's explain why

Let's remember how the sun point is created

We understand the space is similar to the sea of water and it's in continuous motion and NO stationary point can be found in it- the sun point of space should be a stationary point- for that the sun point of space creation needed specific procedure

The planets were found before the sun creation and the planets revolve around a point in space (any point in space) the revolution creates two velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value opposite in direction- the total be Zero- means- the revolution motion creates a stationary point in the revolution center-

By that the sun point of space is created as a stationary point- and the sun point is the only stationary point in the solar system- for that all motions are done relative to the sun point of space- but let's ask

What does mean Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s? it means – the sun point of space is a stationary point and its velocity is 1 km/s (Zero approximately)- and that means- the space around the sun has waves move by velocity 1 km/s while Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s and that means the space around Pluto has waves move by 4.7 km/s and by Pluto motion the waves around the sun moves by 4.7 km/s because of Pluto motion effect

Shortly- the sun is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun because it's the minimum velocity in the solar system.

II- The Comparison

The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system three times

(From Neptune to Saturn) This Is The First Reflection

(From Uranus to Jupiter) This Is The Second Reflection

(From Venus to Mars) This Is The Third Reflection

Here we compare among the data of these planets- the comparison provides 7 groups of data in each group we compare the planets data because I want to prove that the planets use similar behaviors to produce their data – means- this all data is created based on geometrical rules which proves that there's one reason caused to create all this data and this reason is the gravitational waves reflection- In the comparison I start by Venus reflection (the 3rd one) then Uranus reflection (the 2nd one) and Neptune reflection (1st one) because Venus is very simple data and can be understood easily-

The Data Changes

The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in the planets data let's refer to these changes in following

What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.

What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection

The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.

The energy direction is changed by the reflection

The players of the rates of time are reflected also –

Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have discussed- the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn– and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets -

These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the comparison of the data and the detailed analysis for the wave reflection.

Group Data No (I)

(1)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

And

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

(2)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

(3)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–

BUT

The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And

(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

Discussion

(1)

The data shows the following

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference

This data proved my planet definition (the planets are geometrical points carried by the same one energy- or- the planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam- and the planets move with this light beam motion- and the planets are created depending on each other and No planet is independent from the others in its creation and motion) – means- the planets are similar to whirlpools (vortex) found on the sea water page- we can imagine many whirlpools (vortex) are found on the same one sea and they are near to each other- this picture is very similar to the planets nature- that explains how the reflection of energy for one time can define the orbital periods for three planets (or 4 planets) together-

Here we imagine there are 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and then one strong wave of water passed through these 4 whirlpools (vortex), and this water wave motion causes effects on the 4 whirlpools-

This information is so important because one motion only (one wave reflection) can cause to define three or four planets data that proves strongly the planets Can NOT be independent neither in Creation Nor in motion- the planets are created and moving depends on each other because all of them are created from the same one energy and they move with this same energy motion-

NOTICE Let's imagine we have 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and one strong water wave passes through these 4 whirlpools (vortex) - now – suppose we put some red color on this strong water wave- what would happen? The water color will be red and the red water will pass through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)

We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.

That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other –

Now let's analyze each reflection individually

(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)

224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)

AND-

680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –

As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)

The orbital periods definition

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We don't discuss the precession cycle here

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)

It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.

The important notice here tells that- the gravitational wave reflection for one time defines 3 planets orbital periods – this fact is proved strongly by the data and it disproves the wrong idea tells (Planet is created independently from the other planets)

(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)

Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

The comparison shows clearly the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because

The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-

Notice - please note clearly that – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-

It's one gravitational wave sent from Pluto to Neptune and reflected to Saturn then this same wave is sent from Saturn to Uranus and Uranus reflected the same wave to Jupiter and Jupiter sent the same wave to Venus and Venus reflected the same wave to Mars- One Gravitational Wave moves through all these planets

The Conclusion

The planets data is distributed in the reversed direction for the reflected energy- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter but the data is distributed from Jupiter to Uranus- there's a geometrical reason for this behavior we should discover later.

(3) The First Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Neptune To Saturn)

We still have another problem- let's remember this problem reason

The gravitational wave first reflection is done from Pluto to Neptune, supposing Neptune would send the energy to Uranus but Neptune didn't send the energy instead Neptune kept the energy inside its orbit and prevent it to move toward Uranus – also Uranus itself couldn't release the imprisoned energy from Neptune orbit – and that necessitated Saturn itself to create interaction with Neptune to release the imprisoned energy for that the energy is moved toward Saturn immediately by that this reflection of the wave is considered the first reflection because the energy is released from Neptune to Saturn directly – Shortly- the wave energy is sent from Pluto to Neptune and the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and this is the first reflection of the energy (the gravitational wave first reflection)

Let's see the data - The distance 1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) is still a distance And (1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

The data follows the rule (2π, 4π, 8π) perfectly as the other two reflections but the data shows 2 problems which are

1st problem

The data distribution is in the reversed direction of the energy motion direction- because the reflection is done from Neptune to Saturn but the data shows the orbital circumferences of (Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto) are defined by this reflection which supposes the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune and that's NOT Fact

This behavior is typical the behavior of the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter-

Means- this behavior is repeated in the two reflections of energy which tells that the behavior depends on a geometrical reason.

2nd problem

The distance is not changed into a period of time as the other reflections but stayed as a distance! How and why?? let's see deeply this data

If the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune, Saturn orbital circumference 9010 mkm should be changed into a period of time to be 9010 days and then

9010 days x 2π = 2 x 28244 days (28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference)

9010 days x 4π = 113223 days

9010 days x 6π = 169840 days

We see the data gives NO real values- means- this is not the direction of the data creation- Instead – the distance 1433 mkm or the circumference 9010 mkm is still distance and then

1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

And

1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference

We understand that, the data provides a distance (1433 mkm) and not a period of time then we have to ask again why this distance is not changed into a period of time?

We understand that the outer planets have 2 reflections (first reflection from Neptune to Saturn) and (the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter)- also we understand that the solar system needs one reflection only in the outer planets and one reflection only in the inner planets and also we know the outer planets have two reflections because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system- means if Neptune is removed from the solar system the outer planets would have one reflection only – for that- the designer caused the two reflections in the outer planets to be complementary one another – the reflection from Uranus to Jupiter defines the planets orbital periods and the reflection from Neptune to Saturn defines these same planets orbital circumferences

The designer caused to make the two reflections complementary one another and by that the two reflections can be unified into one reflection and based on that the machine will work by one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets- but how the energy motion produces the distances in place of the periods of time? this question is hard to answer because we don't see deeply how the reflection of energy can define each planet orbital period (or orbital circumference) by using the rates (2π, 4π, 6π) we just discovered the rule but more geometrical analysis is required to see how this rule works

NOTICE

In the third reflection (from Venus to Mars) – let's remember the data

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We have asked- why Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate (0.8)?

Let's try to answer – let's see the data 10747 /9800 = 9800/9010 where

10747 days = Saturn orbital period and 9010 mkm = Saturn orbital circumference

9800 mkm = 2 x 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)

We know 4900 mkm and 4900 days is the player in the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter- means- Saturn has effect also in the second reflection for that the second reflection has effect on Saturn data and caused its orbital period to be produced under the effect of the rate (0.8) which is the reflection rate as we will see in the next data

Group Data No (II)

(1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

(2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

Discussion

We discuss the data no. (2) and (3) at first

DATA NO. (2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(0.421 mkm = Uranus motion distance in its rotation period)

DATA NO. (3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

(0.3129 mkm = Neptune motion distance in its rotation period)

MORE DATA

0.5875 mkm (Uranus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.46688 mkm

(0.466884 mkm = Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Neptune motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3736 mkm

(0.3736 mkm = Saturn motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Pluto motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3248 mkm

(i)

The rate (0.8) is created by the waves reflection and the planets velocities are defined based on each other by this rate as discussed in the planet velocity definition- here the data shows the rate (0.8) defines each planet motion distance based on the other planet motion distance (in the same one reflection) –

let's explain that in more details

(1st reflection From Neptune to Saturn) for that

Saturn motion distance per solar day (0.838 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Neptune motion distance in its rotation period 0.3129 million km

Also

Neptune motion distance per solar day (0.46688 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 million km

AND

(2nd reflection From Uranus to Jupiter) for that

Jupiter motion distance per solar day (1.1318 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Uranus motion distance in its rotation period 0.421 million km

Also

Uranus motion distance per solar day (0.5875 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period 0.46688 million km

AND

In the 3rd reflection we will see Mars motion distance per solar day is defined by Venus motion distance per solar day- follows the same rule

Notice

We note the data No. (2) and (3) show the data is distributed in the reversed direction for the energy motion because the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and from Uranus to Jupiter- But data is distributed in the reversed direction-

In the third reflection we will see the data moves in the same direction with the energy distribution

Also

In Venus data we will see that it uses the square value (0.8)^2 and we will explain why the rate is used in square value

(ii)

Why is the rate (1.0725) found in the data? because the gravitational wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s) in Saturn orbit and in all planets orbits till Venus orbit-

Shortly

the wave velocity was 205.8 km/s through Pluto, Neptune and Uranus orbits BUT

The wave velocity is accelerated in Saturn orbit and its velocity be = speed of light =300000 km/s, for that reason the rate (1.0725) is created because this is (Lorentz length contraction effect rate) and it can be produced only by motion with speed=(99% speed of light =297000 km/s)- shortly- the wave velocity be equal=speed of light = 300000 km/s in Saturn orbit, for that the rate (1.0725) is produced in the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter as the data shows (and also in Venus data we will see it)

(iii)

The previous data shows the planets distances are rated by the rate (0.8) for the planets players in the same wave reflection- but- this picture is not complete yet – because the planets which aren't players in the same reflection shows equal distances also but this distances equality doesn't depend on the rate (0.8) let's give examples

Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period = Neptune motion distance per solar day =0.466884 million km

And

Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 mkm x π = Uranus motion distance per solar day 0.5875 mkm x 2

And

The Earth motion distance per solar day = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period = 2.574 million km

This distances equality must be produced also by the waves reflection but the rule is not clear yet- I want to say the effect of the rate (0.8) on the planets distances is part of greater rule explains how this distances equality is produced and the useful result of it –

Please note–I analyze this data in details in 2nd part of this 1st hypothesis explanation-

Now

Let's discuss the data No.(1)

DATA NO. (1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (The Earth motion distance per solar day) = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day= Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

Means

3.024 million km x (0.8)^2 x 1.0725 = 2.082 million km where

3.024 mkm =Venus motion distance per solar day

2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day

Notice

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day

2.57 mkm = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm The moon motion distance per solar day

2.59 mkm = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

The data tells Mars motion distance per solar day depends on Venus motion distance per solar day – here all distances are defined by the solar day-

In the third reflection- the wave is reflected from Venus to Mars- here also Venus motion distance per solar day (3.024 mkm) defines Mars motion distance per solar day (2.082 mkm)- but the definition depends on the squared value (0.8)^2

That shows Venus reflection follows the same rule used by the other reflections – where the sender planet motion distance per solar day defines the receiver planet motion distance

Perfectly the rule is followed BUT Why does Venus use the square value (0.8)^2??

Because of the reflections order – let's explain that

The two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and by that they are unified and can be considered as One Unified Reflection in the outer planets

Means- there is one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets and these are two reflections- means – Venus reflection should be considered the second reflection that causes to square the value (0.8)- that explains why Venus uses the squared Value (0.8)^2

Notice

This is a proof for my theory that (one gravitational wave is reflected three times)- means- this wave is reflected before and effected by the rate (0.8) and this same wave is reflected again for that the rate (0.8) be in its squared value (0.8)^2

The Conclusion

The gravitational waves reflection causes the sender planet motion distance to define the receiver planet motion distance as seen in the data- the definition depends on the rate (0.8) – here we see one rule proves the receiver planet motion depends on the sender planet motion-

Group Data No (III)

(1)

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

(2)

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6

(3)

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

And

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

Discussion

Data No. (1)

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

568 x 10^24 kg = Saturn Mass

102 x 10^24 kg = Neptune Mass

59800 days = Neptune orbital period

10747 days = Saturn orbital period

In the first reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Neptune to Saturn

This behavior shows second rule– for the planets in the same reflection- we see the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate and this behavior is used by the other two reflections- means- the gravitational wave reflection between two planets cause these two planets masses rate to define their orbital periods rate – let's see the rest data

Data No. (2)

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6 (notice1407.6π =4331 error 2%)

1898 x 10^24 kg = Jupiter Mass

86.8 x 10^24 kg = Uranus Mass

30589 days = Uranus orbital period

4331 days = Jupiter orbital period

In second reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter

It's the same rule and behavior, the planets masses rates defines their orbital periods

Just Jupiter orbital period 4331 is divided by (π) – no any other change in the rule proves that the rule is a fact and used with the planets of the same reflection

Data No. (3)

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

4.87 x 10^24 kg = Venus Mass and 0.642 x 10^24 kg= Mars Mass

224.7 days = Venus orbital period and 687 days= Mars orbital period

In the third reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Venus to Mars

Here also we see the planets use the same rule and the same behavior – the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate-But the rate is squared! Why?

Venus Mass = 7.6 Mars Mass but the data uses the squared rate (7.6)^2 –

We should pay attention for this rate because the other planets used their masses rate but NOT squared value – Why does Venus use the squared value (7.6)^2?

We have solved this question in the distances discussion when Venus used (0.8)^2 and the other planets use (0.8) only- here also is similar to that- let's remember the reason

We agreed that the two wave reflections in the outer planets are complementary one another and by that they are unified together into one unified reflection and by that the outer planets has one unified reflection and the inner planets has one single reflection and these are considered as two reflections and for that Venus reflection is considered the second one in the solar system (and the final one) for that Venus uses the squared Value – where we know the wave reflection causes to square the value

Notice - 5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747) = (10/1.8) =9010/1622 where 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination and 10 =4 x 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) and -9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference and 1622 mkm = Neptune Uranus Distance

Notice π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%) – this data is discussed in the next point

The Conclusion The Wave Reflection Causes The Sender And Receiver Planets Masses Rate To Define Their Orbital Periods Rate.

Group Data No (IV)

(1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

(2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 =5.56/2

(3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Discussion

Notice

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

This data shows the rates (5.56) and (7.6) are found based on the value (π^3=31) I try to prove that it's one energy (one value π^3=31) and the different rates as (5.56 and 7.6) are found depending on (this one value π^3=31) by geometrical reasons – that proves it's one energy (one wave) is reflected three times in the solar system – the value (π^3 = 31 =) is very important because all rates depend on it

The group data shows the planets diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 =31)- let's examine it in following

Data No. (1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination

1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination

The data shows the two planets diameters are rated with rate equal their orbital inclination and this rate equal π^0.5

Notice

177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) x 93.4

90+ 3.4 = 93.4 deg

Data No. (2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 = 5.56

We remember 31 = (5.56)^2

Data No. (3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Also we remember 31/4 = 7.75 (and the difference between 7.75 and 7.6 is 2%)

The data shows the diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 = 31 =) as the masses do

Means- the planets masses and diameters are created rated to one another based on this same value (π^3 = 31 =)

I try to prove that – one energy is found behind all this data- the value (π^3 = 31 =) refers to one energy and this energy is effected by different geometrical reasons and that causes this energy (π^3 = 31 =) to show different rates as (5.56) and (7.6)

Shortly – we deal with one energy reflected three times in the solar system and the planets data are defined by the effect of this energy on them

Please note- we can imagine one river of water moves through different cities and each city deals with the river based on its own data- one city has great soil and this uses the river water to plant vegetables and fruits- another city its ground has many holes and caves the river water will cause all these holes to be filled of water and that will create many moors in this city and that will not be useful for it –

We have here the same picture-

One energy moves through the solar system and reflected three times in it and this reflection causes changes for the planets data for that the different rates (5.56 and 7.6) are created from this one energy (π^3 = 31 =) by geometrical reasons have effects on it. (CONT)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

[email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

2 notes · View notes

unexplainedie · 5 months ago

Text

#einstein #science #research #toe #theoryOfEverything #quantumGravity #unexplainedie #unexplained

0 notes

alexanderrogge · 8 months ago

Text

University of Southampton - Scientists closer to finding quantum gravity theory after measuring gravity on microscopic level:

Microgravity #QuantumGravity #Gravity #Levitation #Photonics #Physics

#microgravity #quantumgravity #gravity #levitation #photonics #physics

0 notes

renovatio06 · 11 months ago

Text

New Theory Unites Einstein’s Gravity With Quantum Mechanics | Scitechdaily.com

A new approach seeks to unify quantum theory with classical General Relativity. The testable assumption here is to probe masses with unprecedented accuracy in order to find out, whether or not random fluctuations in the tested results point to a quantum n

The weighing of a mass — an experiment proposed by the UCL group that constrains any theory where spacetime is treated classically. Credit: Isaac Young Source: Reimagining the Cosmos: New Theory Unites Einstein’s Gravity With Quantum Mechanics The assumptions and their implications thereof going into the design of these experiments sound a lot like quantum decoherence to my ears, something…

View On WordPress

#BlackHoles #ClassicalGeneralRelativity #decoherence #Einstein #EN #Newton #quantumgravity #quantumTheory #ScitechDaily #spacetime #SpaceTimeCurvature #TheoryOfEverything #UnifiedTheory #UnquantizedSpacetime

0 notes

taqato-alim · 11 months ago

Text

Analysis of: YouTube video "M Theory - Towards a theory of everything?" by ScienceClic

youtube

In the following text "document" refers to the subtitles to this video.

Here is a summary of the key points discussed:

The document provides an explanatory article on M-theory in theoretical physics for a general audience.

It traces the historical progression of ideas from supergravity to string theory to M-theory dualities being discovered.

The theories and relationships discussed are consistent with the known scientific consensus.

Hypothetical, speculative and fictional elements relate to constructs like strings and extra dimensions that have not been observed.

M-theory is presented as the leading proposal for a unified theory, though aspects remain conjectural pending advances.

The goal of finding a quantum theory of gravity reconciling GR and QM at fundamental scales is discussed.

Early programs like supergravity and pioneering string theory sought this unification.

Dualities allowed exploring new regimes, with M-theory the most promising existing framework.

However, an exact M-theory formulation is unknown, and empirical validation is still needed for proposals.

The document aims to explain these complex theoretical physics concepts clearly for non-specialists.

Our discussion evaluated the document's genre, content, relationship to known understanding and portrayal of speculative elements.

Based on the content and style of writing, this document appears to be an explanatory article about M-theory in theoretical physics.

Some key evidence:

The document provides an overview of the theoretical background and developments of M-theory, including its relationships to string theory, supergravity, and attempts to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity.

It explains complex theoretical physics concepts in relatively accessible language, suggesting it aims to inform a general audience rather than being a technical paper.

There is a narrative flow as it traces the historical progression of ideas from supergravity to string theory to M-theory dualities being discovered.

Visual elements like headings and bullet points are used to structure the information for readability.

The tone is even-handed and does not take a position on the validity or prospects of different theories, acting more as a survey of the field.

Based on these linguistic and contextual clues, I would classify this document as an explanatory or informational article about theoretical physics topics, aimed at giving a broad understanding of M-theory to a non-specialist readership. The genre would not be a textbook, research paper or popular news story, but rather explanatory journalism or science writing on M-theory as a theoretical framework.

Here is a summary of the document in bullet points:

Introduces that our universe is currently described by general relativity and the standard model, but they describe different scales and are incompatible at a fundamental quantum gravity scale.

In the 1970s, supergravity was a promising theory but broke down at small scales. It allowed for black holes with additional dimensions.

In the 1980s, string theory emerged, hypothesizing all particles are vibrating strings. It incorporates supersymmetry and quantum gravity.

String theory required 10 dimensions and only allowed 5 types of universes matching observations.

Supergravity turned out to be an approximation of string theory in 10 dimensions. It also allows 11 dimensions.

In the 1990s, dualities were discovered connecting string theories and relating them to 11-dimensional supergravity. This allowed exploring strongly interacting regimes.

Edward Witten proposed in 1995 that strings, supergravity and their dualities approximate a single theory, called M-theory, in 11 dimensions.

M-theory's nature is unknown but likely a new description of reality. It remains speculative but is the leading candidate for a "Theory of Everything".

Ongoing research includes Matrix model descriptions of M-theory and other approaches like loop quantum gravity. Experimental validation is still needed.

M-theory has advanced fundamental physics and mathematics while its prospects to unify quantum mechanics and gravity remain promising but uncertain.

Here is a summary of the key points made in the document in relation to M-theory:

M-theory was proposed by Edward Witten in 1995 as a single underlying framework that could potentially describe the various string theories and 11D supergravity as different approximations.

It was envisioned as a yet unknown fundamental theory that these existing models only provide partial descriptions of.

At large scales, M-theory is hypothesized to describe an 11-dimensional supersymmetric universe containing membranes.

However, its precise mathematical formulation at a basic quantum gravity scale remains unknown.

Attempts to describe it include the matrix model approach, but the topic remains very complex.

Like other quantum gravity theories, M-theory currently lacks experimental validation.

It allows for different initial universe configurations but our specific realization is speculative.

Despite uncertainties, M-theory is presented as the most promising candidate for a "Theory of Everything" unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity.

Ongoing research aims to further develop M-theory descriptions and explore connections to other approaches.

So in summary, the document frames M-theory as the leading existing proposal for a unified theory, while acknowledging key aspects of its theoretical underpinning and nature remain conjectural pending future mathematical and empirical advances. It surveys M-theory's postulated features and role in the field of quantum gravity.

Here is a summary of the key points made in the document in relation to quantum gravity:

The goal of finding a quantum theory of gravity that can reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics at fundamental scales is introduced.

Early attempts like supergravity broke down at small scales below the Planck length where gravity needs quantization.

String theory emerged as a pioneering approach that incorporated quantum gravity by describing particles as vibrating strings.

It led to insights like calculating black hole entropy in agreement with Hawking radiation.

Discoveries of dualities between string theories and connections to 11D supergravity allowed exploring quantum gravity regimes previously intractable.

Edward Witten's proposal of M-theory positioned it as the most promising existing framework attempting to achieve a quantum gravity unified theory.

At its core, M-theory remains speculative, with its exact mathematical formulation unknown.

Other ongoing approaches to quantum gravity are also mentioned, like loop quantum gravity.

But M-theory currently stands as the leading candidate for finally solving the long-sought unification of general relativity with quantum mechanics.

So in summary, the document frames the history and status of research aiming to develop a quantum theory of gravity, identifying M-theory as the most advanced existing proposal for achieving this outstanding goal in fundamental physics.

Here is an evaluation of the document in relation to the known consensus in theoretical physics:

The overview of the development of ideas from general relativity to string theory to M-theory is consistent with the standard historical narrative in the field.

The description of theories like supergravity, string theory and their fundamental elements/assumptions aligns with mainstream reference works.

The mathematical relationships between theories established through dualities and cited in the document, such as T-duality and AdS/CFT, are well-established theoretical results.

Prominent figures and their contributions discussed, including Witten's proposal of M-theory, match the scientific record and biographies.

Open questions acknowledged, such as M-theory's full formulation, remain unresolved consensus issues within theoretical physics.

Other current programs continuing the unification goal, like loop quantum gravity, are also correctly recognized.

Limitations around the speculative nature and lack of experimental tests are clearly outlined.

Overall, the explanations, sequencing of ideas, relationships drawn and unanswered problems raised in the document are fully consistent with my understanding of the scientific consensus perspectives in both theoretical and historical aspects of physics. No contradictory information is presented. The document accurately reflects the known state of mainstream thinking in these specialized theoretical domains.

Here are the main hypothetical, speculative or fictional elements discussed in the document in bullet points:

Existence of additional spatial dimensions beyond the 4 dimensions of everyday experience.

Theoretical constructs like strings, brains, and higher-dimensional objects that have not been observed.

Hypothetical symmetries like supersymmetry and the implications if they exist.

Specific string theory landscape predictions like the 5 theory types which universe we inhabit is unknown.

Conjectural nature of M-theory as a framework unifying different models vs a specific theory.

Proposals for how M-theory might work at a fundamental scale like the matrix model approach.

Initial states and geometries of spacetime allowed by different theories but our specific configuration is speculative.

Fictional scenarios used for illustration like dimensions compactifying into circles.

The future possibility of experimental tests but none available currently to validate proposals.

Ongoing attempts in approaches like loop quantum gravity are theoretical programs not established science.

So in summary, while building on established theoretical mathematics, the document discusses many hypothetical constructs, theoretical predictions and speculative proposals that have not yet been empirically confirmed or experimentally tested in the quest for a quantum gravity unified theory.

Here is an evaluation of the status of the document along various scales:

Science vs Fiction:

The document firmly discusses science, outlining theoretical physics frameworks and developments grounded in mathematics.

While speculative in nature, M-theory is presented as a scientific hypothesis, not fictional imaginings.

Empirical vs Anecdotal:

No empirical evidence is available yet to validate any theory of quantum gravity.

The theories outlined remain at the theoretical/conceptual level without empirical confirmation or refutation.

Fact vs Opinion:

The historical details and descriptions of theories represent established theoretical facts within the field.

It does not advance strong opinions, only acknowledging open questions and uncertainties.

Objective vs Subjective:

The information is presented objectively without obvious biases.

However, choices around focus, structure and examples reflect some subjectivity of explanation.

As theoretical physics, the models discussed have not been objectively proven like empirical facts.

In summary, while discussing speculative theoretical ideas yet to be empirically validated, the document firmly grounds its presentation in established theoretical frameworks and developments within science. It aims for an objective tone without advocating opinions, situating it more on the science/fact/objective end of the relevant spectra compared to fiction/opinion/subjective. Some subjectivity is inevitable given the explanatory task. Overall, it communicates current scientific knowledge as objectively as its theoretical material allows.

I did not detect any logical fallacies in the document.

The document is presenting theoretical scientific concepts in an explanatory manner, aiming to outline historical developments and relationships between different models rather than make logical arguments. Some key points:

No causal claims are made that would be open to causation vs correlation fallacies.

No flawed statistical reasoning or logical deductions are presented that could constitute statistical or formal fallacies.

There are no emotional appeals, hyperbolic language or other rhetorical devices that could introduce persuasive/propaganda fallacies.

Different theories are presented even-handedly without omitting countervailing evidence, avoiding cherry-picking or strawman fallacies.

Connections between concepts are described based on theoretical relationships established within physics, rather than unsupported associations.

Uncertainties in theoretical understanding are openly acknowledged rather than hidden or misrepresented through fallacies of ambiguity or composition/division.

Qualifiers are used appropriately so no claims attributed to experts that weren't actually made (fallacy of appeal to authority).

Overall, as an explanatory piece focused on clearly outlining theoretical scientific concepts, it does not appear to introduce any logical fallacies through flawed reasoning structures, omission of relevant information, deceptive rhetorical devices or other flawed argumentation techniques. The document communicates information about physics models in a logical manner given its explanatory scientific scope and context.

Here is an evaluation of the document based on common criteria for its genre as an explanatory article:

Clarity:

The document effectively explains complex theoretical physics concepts in clear, straightforward language for a general audience. Technical terms are defined.

The overall narrative and use of headings/structure helps guide the reader through the progression of ideas.

Examples and analogies like dimensions compactifying into circles aid comprehension.

Accuracy:

The historical overview and descriptions of theories like string theory and relationships between ideas align with my understanding from other reliable sources.

No technical inaccuracies are apparent in discussing theories at a broad, conceptual level.

Coverage:

The document provides a comprehensive overview of the key developments that led to the emergence of M-theory as a framework.

Major theories and discoveries are discussed in reasonable depth within the constraints of the general explanatory format.

Objectivity:

Presentation of information remains neutral without advocating for any particular theory. Both prospects and limitations are acknowledged.

Competing approaches are also mentioned without preference shown.

Interest:

Complex ideas are conveyed accessibly thanks to the logical structure and illustrations used.

Sufficient context helps maintain reader engagement in abstract theoretical concepts.

Historical narrative style enhances the readability of the scientific information.

Overall, the document performs well as an explanatory article according to common evaluation criteria for genres such as clarity, accuracy, coverage, objectivity and ability to communicate ideas of interest to general readers. It achieves its goal of accessibly outlining M-theory's development and status.

0 notes

shravya96 · 2 months ago

Video

youtube

Could Extra Dimensions Solve the Quantum Gravity Puzzle #sciencefather #...

The concept of extra dimensions is an intriguing proposal in theoretical physics that could help solve the quantum gravity puzzle by unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity. String theory and its successor, M-theory, suggest the existence of more than the familiar three spatial dimensions, proposing up to 11 dimensions. These extra dimensions might be compactified and hidden from direct observation. The added spatial dimensions could help reconcile the inconsistencies between quantum mechanics, which governs the microscopic world, and general relativity, which describes gravity on a large scale. By allowing gravity to propagate through additional dimensions, it becomes possible to explain its relative weakness compared to other forces. If these theories hold true, they could lead to a unified "theory of everything

#sciencefather#ExtraDimensions #QuantumGravity #StringTheory #MTheory #QuantumMechanics #GeneralRelativity #UnifiedTheory #Physics #TheoreticalPhysics ScientificDiscovery #LabLife #ResearchCommunity #ScienceCommunication #ResearcherLife #DataScience #PhDLife #PostdocLife #ResearchAndDevelopment #ScholarlyWork #InnovationInScience #GrantWriting #ResearchImpact #ScientificResearch #ResearchCollaboration #ResearchExcellence #STEMResearch #researchgoals

International Young Scientist Awards

Website link: youngscientistawards.com

Nomination Link: https://youngscientistawards.com/award-nomination/?ecategory=Awards&rcategory=Awardee

Social Media:

Twitter : https://twitter.com/youngsc06963908

Linkedin- : https://www.linkedin.com/in/shravya-r...

Pinterest : https://in.pinterest.com/youngscienti...

Blog : https://youngscientistaward.blogspot....

Tumblr : https://www.tumblr.com/blog/shravya96

#youtube

0 notes

skygatedental-blog · 1 year ago

Text

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/skygatedental_dentalbacteria-quantumgravity-cosmicmysteries-activity-7118361998886608898-stpK?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

1 note · View note

ecstadelicnet · 4 years ago

Photo

Now cosmology inches towards the next paradigm shift: One of the most mind-boggling discoveries of modernity is that the fabric of spacetime is emergent from something beneath it. "[O]ne new theory says that Dark Matter may be ordinary matter in a parallel universe. If a galaxy is hovering above in another dimension, we would not be able to see it. It would be invisible, yet we would feel its gravity. Hence, it might explain Dark Matter," in the words of Michio Kaku. https://www.ecstadelic.net/top-stories/dark-matter-may-be-ordinary-matter-in-parallel-spacetime-continuums-heres-why #DarkMatter #DarkEnergy #QuantumGravity #ComputationalPhysics #MTheory #DTheoryofTime #OmegaSingularity #pancomputationalism #multiverse #ontology https://www.instagram.com/p/CLkmP7cAnH3/?igshid=1qlmxvqy4umjm

#darkmatter #darkenergy #quantumgravity #computationalphysics #mtheory #dtheoryoftime #omegasingularity #pancomputationalism #multiverse #ontology

2 notes · View notes

kleeirwin · 4 years ago

Video

youtube

This is talk given via zoom to the QGR staff.

Klee Irwin - Bending the Second Law

Classic & Quantum Mechanics is a theory based on the notion that at the very core of reality, randomness is the fundamental stuff of nature. So what we have is an ergodic theory wherein the microstate configurations that are energetically equal and describe some macroscopic configuration with a fixed energy "E" are all equally probable. If it were possible that emergent forms of ultra high complex information can act as a statistical force then in principle that very difficult to compute emergent complex energy systems information can act as a ergodicity buster to dehomogenize the microstate configurations in order to select the ones that lead to higher magnitudes if emergent complex information according to what the strategy is of that system of complex information.

https://quantumgravityresearch.org/

#kleeirwin #qgr #quantum #quantumgravity #quantumgravityresearch #physics #physicist #science #scientist #math #maths #mathematics #mathematician

1 note · View note

procommun · 2 years ago

Link

Stephen Hawking's black hole paradox may finally have a solution

#blackholeinformationparadox #blackholes #cananythingescapeablackhole #firewallparadox #generalrelativity #hawkingradiation #quantumgravity #quantummechanics #stephenhawking

0 notes

comiceuro-blog · 6 years ago

Photo

#language is one of the #shadows of the #mind ... I guess that’s the ontology of ‘throwing shade’ ... trying to wrap my mind around inter dimensional interactions and how one dimension shadows in the lower dimensions. It’s so fascinating how we are trapped in a 3 dimensional space and we are restricted to only see the world in 2 dimensions. To us the world is essentially flat, and we only perceive depth cause of light bouncing effects. Virtual reality allows some sort of departure from that trap. It seems we are close to simulate how a 4 dimensional being could see our 3 dimensional world. All those medical virtual reality apps where you can MRI through a body are kinda going there. I spent hours rotating 4-dimensional cubes ‘tessaracts’ trying to click into the 4th dimension. To no avail yet. But something is shifting very slowly. What a time to be alive! ;) so up in the clouds these days.. someone pull me back to earth please. It’s so funny I was telling some of this to one of my dear co-workers.. and he was like.. Dimitri, we are trying to figure out this project here, in 3 dimensions. Please stop. I couldn’t stop laughing.. ;) 🌌 #dimensions #4d #spatial #lattice #8L #quantumgravity (at San Francisco, California)

#quantumgravity #spatial #language #lattice #mind #shadows #dimensions #8l #4d

2 notes · View notes

itsgerges · 14 days ago

Text

Best Regards

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis

Basic Critic Against The Physics Book

It's the main problem I found in the solar system Geometry- the Physicist sees something but the designer sees another thing– these are two different visions for the same solar system- that answers (Why Are So Many Theories In The Physics Book Just Imaginary Ideas And Not Facts?)– let's discuss this problem

The Physicist Vision

The Designer Vision

The designer aims to create integration- as the marriage – male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child

INTEGRATION this is the word inside the designer Mind

And

I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method

Example No. (1)

Notice

Example No. (2)

The scientists stated (The Sun Rays Are Created By The Sun Nuclear Fusion Process)

Why?

Because they think the sun is independent from the planets and each planet is independent from the other– the harmony motion can not prove all players are created from one unified source (one energy) - the integration is not seeing here

But

We can reach to the facts simply- because- the planet moves and produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy is stored in the space in moving waves-

The simple idea tells (the energy can NOT be stored in the space forever) this stored energy must be used- here we see how the sun rays is created- clearly- the Sun Is NOT Doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays- why? because the solar system is very rich in the motion energy and massive motion energy is stored in the space logically this stored energy must be used by some method- based on that- I conclude – the sun rays are produced from this stored energy regardless the production mechanism (means even if I don't know how the sun rays is produced by this energy) I still can confirm that the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies which are stored in the solar system space as moving waves-

I wish I explain the idea clearly -I can discover the space nature and features by planet motion analysis – why? because of the integration- they do one unified job together and each player can be defined by the analysis for the other player.

Notice The paper second hypothesis tells (the sun rays is created by the gravitational waves motions and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies, means the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies total) the hypothesis is discussed and proved in the paper abstract and discussion

The Concept Problem -the problem is the eyes – the physicist eyes should see the integration while the integration is growing– let's give example to see this problem

The Earth and its moon move together and they create integrated motion- that shows unified motion by the two planets – but this integration is growing by Venus Motion effect on both planets and by that we have greater integration contains (The Earth- The Moon – Venus) – But Mars also has effect on the three planets – that shows greater integration contains the four planets and of Course Mercury has effect on all and that created greater integration contains the inner planets –

The integration is growing till contain all planets and the Sun together – why?- because it's One Unified Energy behind all players

It needs one genius can understand all these motions and their effects on each other to create one unified motion and one unified effect

The physicist needs very wide eyes can see the great integrated system and all small integrated systems inside it– (something like a great chess board which have hundreds of pieces- if the eyes can see all pieces motions and their effects)

The Concept Use Difficulty-

Why is it hard to discover the integration in the solar system?

Because the geometrical rules are not known and by that we don't know what effect is produced by this integration – the paper hypotheses provide examples to explain that.

PAPER FIRST HYPOTHESIS

Paper first hypothesis

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (Moreover the sun is not producing a gravitational field) and

The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and (From Uranus to Jupiter) and (from Venus to Mars) –

Paper 1st hypothesis (The objective of the hypothesis)

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

Paper 1st hypothesis Proof (The Proving Method)

The wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design (A Summary)

The reflections cause defined changes in the planets data – and

Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation and Proof Discussion

The explanation is discussed in two parts

1ST PART

I- Preface

II- The Comparison

III- The explanation of the wave energy reflection effect on the solar system design

2nd PART

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Detailed Discussion

(Paper 1st hypothesis Explanation) 1ST PART

I- Preface

(1)

Planet Motion Energy Analysis

(2)

These Waves Are The Gravitational Waves (My Hypothesis)

AND

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

The 1st Conclusion

The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space

Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves -

Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why?

(3)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

(v)

The 2nd Conclusion

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

(4)

The Energy Reflection Trajectory

Let's remember what we know till now

(a)

Now- this unified wave is reflected from Pluto to Venus orbit- Means- the unified wave is reflected and sent from Pluto to Neptune to the next planets till reach Venus

The unified wave is reflected three times in the solar system

(from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) and

(from Uranus and Jupiter) and

(from Venus to Mars)

With each reflection of the wave defined changes are done for the planets data

But let's refer to the general design behind these three reflections in following

(b)

We remember this new article

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam-

My hypothesis tells (the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity)

Let's put the ideas beside one another to see the general design

Means

The machine needs one reflection to change the speed from (speed of light C=30000 km/s to the value C^2 =squared speed of light) and by that the light beam is created

Now – let's ask -

How can the wave moves by speed of light?

We remember- the one unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves in Pluto orbit with velocity 205.8 km/s – how can this gravitational wave moves by speed of light?

By another reflection of energy – let's see that in following

300000 km/s = (205.8 km/s)^2 x 7.1

This equation tells

The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities

(205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s

Means the gravitational wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s

BUT

If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1

Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1

BUT

The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light)

That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

Here we see clearly that

The machine needs one energy reflection only to accelerate the wave velocity from 205.8 km/s to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

And

The machine needs one more reflection only to change the wave speed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to (C^2 =squared speed of light) by which the light beam is created

Shortly -the machine needs only two reflections of energy to produce the light beam from the gravitational waves motions

Now – let's ask– Why Are There Three Reflections Of Energy In The Solar System? If The Machine Needs Just Two Reflections Why The Machine Uses Three Reflections?

Because

Pluto reflected the energy toward Neptune but Neptune didn't send the energy to Uranus instead Neptune captured and energy and used it for its orbit and by that the energy be stored in Neptune orbit can didn't reach to Uranus- this effect of Neptune motion caused great problem in the solar system- in that time Saturn was not created yet- and Uranus couldn't release the energy from Neptune orbit for that Uranus made an interaction with the Earth and by this interaction Saturn is created for that Saturn is a planet its father is Uranus and its mother is the Earth- Saturn move depends on Uranus and the Earth motions- and -Saturn released the energy from Neptune orbit – for that – the first reflection is from Neptune to Saturn – that's why I call this reflection (from Pluto and Neptune to Saturn) because it’s the energy of Pluto but it's captured in Neptune orbit and Saturn released the energy from Neptune orbit (The 1st reflection of energy) and Saturn sent the energy immediately to Uranus and Uranus reflected the energy to Jupiter (The 2nd reflection of energy) and Jupiter sent the energy to Venus and Venus reflected the energy to Mars (The 3rd reflection of energy)- Now – we understand that – Neptune effect caused to reflect the energy one more time – if Neptune is not found in the solar system the energy would be reflected two times only and they will be enough to produce the light beam

(c)

Please note- the two reflections in the outer planets are done to produce a result of one reflection only and for that the two reflections are complementary one another as we will discuss- and – the solar system general design depends only on two reflections- means- spite they are three reflections and we will see in details each reflection effect but the solar system general design depends on two reflections because the third reflection is found because of Neptune negative effect- means- it's found only for repair the negative effect and if Neptune negative effect is removed this 3rd reflection will be removed for that the design depends on 2 reflections only- discussed later