#psycho-linguistic programming

[cathulhu-collective]

Dear r/systemscringe:

To follow up my last post, I have a slew of further evidence for you, alongside a special challenge.

Here is the site, Peerblock. Don't worry, I'm sure smarty pants like you guys will be able to figure out how to use it, if a silly psychotic like myself can. Go ahead and run the program, as long as you feel like running it. If any of you get even 1 result from the US Government, I will concede to you I'm just some silly psycho who doesn't know what I'm talking about.

Check out the date. I made sure to pick today's current date and time to show you my last post wasn't a 1 off fluke several months ago. This is my computer, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

I don't generally go full ham trying to "prove" shit, but, since I was posted to systemscringe, and I find you all a bunch of sanctimonious fools, I'd love to see you try to debunk me. So, it seemed some of you doubted my information about DARPA (you didn't know it existed till I mentioned it, right?) I'm guessing you didn't look it up after I mentioned it, either. So in general, I'm going to share details about established psychological programs and methods in the defense industry specifically intended to alter and condition its subjects. This goes beyond DARPA, every intelligence agency and defense organizations, and thinktank in existence is knee deep on studying psychological manipulation.

Every screenshot I post will also have a link to the corresponding full pdf or article (you guys won't be able to understand the jargon, though, which is why I'm screenshotting the overviews - wanna test my understanding on any part? go ahead. send me an ask.)

I actually have a friend who worked with a DARPA employee on technology that was meant to be used for "writing" thoughts to a persons brain physically. A far fetched claim, you'll agree.

The back of that phone says, "Thync Alpha"

I'm just curious, how many instances of modern, defense/intelligence sanctioned psychological experimentation programs do I have to cite before you people STFU? I guess probably there is no limit on the amount of hard evidence a contrarian redditor can deny in order to stubbornly cleave to their false assumptions.

How about yet another PDF appropriately titled, "Cognitive Warfare"?:

but nah, r/systemscringe knows way better than DARPA and the US Military, that psychological manipulation, conditioning, and programming for the purposes of control just cannot happen. That was abandoned in the 70s, didn't you hear? That is the end of it. Good thing people won't actually look into the subject and pull up official public documents that are required by these various agencies to be on record. They can rely upon people like you, r/systemscringe, to keep the world from protesting against the ethics of 'cognitive warfare'.

Remember how I said that mind control/coercive influence (they don't call it fucking mind control, *duh*) is widely in use in the military, to condition soldiers properly for combat? This isn't a fact in dispute, or even a secret.

Here is an article from an Indian Defense Studies website.

The author looks pretty credible, huh?

When I said that I can't stand all of this bullshit about how "psychological programming is not possible", I meant it. Your first mistake was to assume that just because I refuse to tell you about the exact, specific, advanced methodology, I lack any evidence to show you. I don't. I could go on, and on, and on. I could write you a thesis.

Here is proof from the illustrious Stanford Research Institute that defense organizations are utilizing and studying Neuro Linguistic Programming - a psychological influence technique in widespread modern use in some contexts, especially including defense and intelligence, but also business and sales.

You could argue this isn't a fair one because it's a study of another nation's use of the technique, but it still contributes to the overall thesis that this stuff exists, plain and simple, no matter who you want to ascribe the source to. That's a very important point to be made here.

If you truly want to find some of your own sources, go ahead and search, "Enhanced Interrogation Tactics" - "BSCT" was a hint, dudes. Here is what BSCTs do.

Wow, it's almost like psychological torture is a form of mind control. It's almost like what I said is complete and total fact.

I guess one of you may argue that these programs, while they support my point about the existence and importance of psychological manipulation in the defense and intelligence sectors, are only for use internationally, and would not be used on private citizens, especially the likes of some random chick. Except, oops, it already was used domestically.

What exactly makes you think that if it could fly in the 70s, it couldn't fly today? Do you realize that even back in the 70s, the MK Ultra program still violated the Geneva Convention? So why do you think that magically, the ethics of this stuff have improved?

Perhaps, juuuust perhaps, I'm not some random person with no background in these areas after all? That maybe there actually are things about my background that would justify psychological control of me through psychological conditioning? That perhaps there is a reason I can easily read and interpret the jargon of these articles, which a "normal" person could never even *find*?

If any of you from system cringe want to message me here and challenge my understanding of these texts, go for it, my asks are open.

[olivesbest]

Shootings And Violence: Impulse Influence Induced?

Impulse (or trigger) influence is characterized by a short-term effect that ends immediately after the trigger transmission ceases. However, it has a rather strong psychogenic impact on the recipients of the information. Such impulse impact is capable of provoking a person to commit antisocial actions that are uncontrolled or poorly controlled by consciousness, including provoking a crime, and even a series of copycat crimes, which are typically aggressive in nature.

This occurs in the presence of additional conditions in the external environment and a certain psycho-emotional state of the subject.

In criminology, triggers are isolated and studied in much the same way as the triggers that provoke suicide epidemic.

Media manipulation of teenagers’ minds was described as early as the 1970s by sociologist David Phillips. He described the Werther syndrome, a pattern of imitative cluster suicides following the well-publicized suicide or one described in a popular work of literature or cinema.

This syndrome is named after the main character who ended his life by suicide in the famous novel The Sorrows of Young Werther. This book was written by the 18th century German playwright Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

After its release, the novel became famous and spawned a wave of suicides among young people.

Psychologist Benedikt Till from the Medical University of Vienna, who specializes in studying this phenomenon, explains it as follows: The Werther effect describes the phenomenon when the number of suicides rises sharply if mass media pay a lot of attention to a suicide and sensationalize it.

If the suicide is described in detail or if the motives of the suicidal person become the subject of public discussion, especially such motives as unrequited love, betrayal of friends, money problems and so on, the effect is particularly strong because the reader identifies with the suicidal person, i.e. is impressed by their image, starts thinking about this all the time and unconsciously projects the possibility of such a suicide onto himself, replaying the suicidal scenario in his head.

Research in the field of criminal justice contains many papers assessing the scale and mechanisms of ‘copycat crime’.

These are crimes whose methods and techniques copy the crimes that the criminals learned about in the media. Let us return to the topic of school shootings and mass shootings. Сan it be that hidden glorification of shooters in the media along with the detailed description, narration and video demonstration of their actions contribute to future mass shootings? The German research Institute of Labor Economics IZA reports that in the U.S., news coverage of a mass shooting causes approximately three mass shootings in the following week. There is a lot to think about.

It is also noteworthy that almost all of the above studies are aimed at studying aggression and violence in the media as affecting human mental health and behavior. However, it is difficult to find studies on the forms in which violence is presented on TV and in the media, and what specific viewpoints and attitudes are shaped in individuals when encountering information about violent situations.

In recent years, new technologies of influence on mass consciousness have become extremely widespread. These are developments from the sphere of psycholinguistics, neuro-linguistic programming, cognitive priming, suggestive linguistics and other highly effective techniques of influence that affect not only consciousness, but also subconscious perception of a person.

The set of influence techniques is diverse, but all of them are based on the psychology of perception. The use of such new manipulation technologies can be found today in the media, as revealed in “The IMPACT” documentary.

Read more about this in the article:

School Shootings And Manipulation Over Consciousness

How to Protect Children and Identify Dangerous Media Content?

#RACIRS #children #parents #cult #anticultism #psychologist #sociologists #criminologist #law #freedom #humanRights

[linguistlist-blog]

FYI: TEL PhD program: deadline is approaching!

The University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Italy is opening a call for 6 PhD positions within the PhD program in Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics (TEL). TEL aims at training scholars in the field of linguistics, considering both theoretical and experimental approaches. In particular, the program focuses on studies in the areas of theoretical syntax, experimental pragmatics, and computational linguistics, taking into account both formal descriptions and psycho/neurolinguistic http://dlvr.it/T8Ps4R

[vikramdhar11]

NLP Training in Pune

Psycho-Linguistic Programming, or NLP, is the first step to changing your life and your way of thinking. This NLP training in Pune will teach you a lesson that will transform your life and your well-being going forward. Global Guru Vikram Dhar will be offering NLP instruction in Bangalore, Pune, and Mumbai. You can enroll both offline and online. Thus, why do you delay? Enroll in the NLP program right now to gain insightful advice and priceless lessons for the future. To Know More Visit :- https://topbusinesscoachesinindia55.blogspot.com/2024/05/unleashing-potential-of-nlp-training-in.html

[tahyal]

Hello tahyal! How can I rewire my subconcious mind? This year I am really stepping into self discovery and spirituality more deeply and last week I realised I have so many limiting beliefs about myself.

Last week my brother's bestfriend, someone I liked a lot, got together with someone and that triggered so many things inside of me that I didnt even know were there. Unfortunately I took it hard, maybe because I've never experinced romance before, which also has been bothering me recently.

I look at his life and think I'll never have that many friends, I'll never have exciting experiences or I'll never find love or be intimate with anyone (Im a late bloomer, never had sex or had a boyfriend, Im 22 years🥲), I'll be stuck in my country living a mediocre life forever etc etc.

I noticed this pattern before and I realised I just dont have high hopes for myself in any regard and Im trying to change that this year. I need help feeling my feelings without ruminating, which I have been trying to do this week, I dont know if I have been very successful at it though. I experience anxiety and a lot of worrying which Im trying to work on as well. I thought I was doing better but that rocked me last week. I am willing to put in the work.

Do you have any messages or advice you can share with me? I know it's a lot, youre the only person Ive shared this with😭

Thank you for what you do on your platform, your grace inspires me, much love🤍

Hi love! Its wonderful that you’re aware of this and are willing to shift your mindset, that’s already 40% of the work.

I’ll give you a list of videos, books, and people that I recommend you check out, get a journal and write down the things that spark something within, and get into the habit of being honest with yourself (you’re already on the right track I think), don’t be afraid to write down your exact feelings, take some time with yourself to figure out why you process things a certain way, why you have certain beliefs, where do they come from, how long have you had them for, how would you react/act if you didn’t have them, which beliefs would help you be the best version of yourself, how can you implement these beliefs, etc.

So, here’s the list :

- Psycho cybernetics by Dr Maxwell Maltz (can listen to it on youtube)

- The Game of life and how to play it by Florence Scovel shinn (available on youtube as well)

- Caroline Myss’s books and conferences

- Dylan James on youtube (I usually find manifestation coaches odd lol but he’s very thorough and pushes you to get to the root cause of your triggers and blockages - he studied neuroscience as well I think)

- Jessica Richburg’s yoga videos on youtube : this is for daily movement, which has a huge impact on your mental and emotional states. Especially hip opening exercises, they’re great for emotional release.

- Dr David Snyder’s NLP (neuro linguistic programming) free lectures on youtube

[jwartblog]

Notes comp...

My brain had suddenly not thought the same way it did, oxygen isn’t getting to it the way it had, blood doesn’t run through it the way it had, it feels like, to a degree, an implosion, not unlike the shift that happens with tectonic plates at the earth’s surface. This means now I can hear my vertebrae at the base of my skull and beneath, the skull cracks at the fissures as if a point of gravity like a warp  is reshaping it. My decision making now is questionable, not criminally questionable, but the decisions I make veer off into peculiar themes, for instance, the whimsy of advertisements. The reactions to them are strong, which may be heightened by a coinciding isolation, all of which could be explained away as neuroses, as so much can be, but the integrity of the diagnosis that that could be is greatly compromised  by  intangibles. I surmise that this has intended to be, for one, a narcissists’ program, in which the language is designed to close off the possibility of social and cognitive maturation. It, instead, endlessly punishes reflection, reason, positive thinking to include any emotional flourishes of joy, exuberance, self-acceptance, an inclination towards the trajectory of all healthy development…It has, I believe destroyed–an embarrassingly easy remedy for all of this notwithstanding–the reward system, an internal resonance for clear thought and careful consideration–qualitative thinking. I can’t wrestle with concepts in the same way I have before. There was a more careful consideration that’s not there anymore, which means the work that I do could suffer for it. The brain is an array of sorts or at least behaves that way, a receiver of input, often vastly ego-centric, easily, near-instantly at the mercy of impulse, which has never quite been that way in adulthood, the way it is now. The formulation of words, increasingly what I would like to articulate comes from an alien place, not that what’s alien has the facility to manage words and construct documents the way I do, but it isn’t concerned with the same things I’m concerned with. What this means is the concern I have for, for example, certain social or creative issues is nearly bankrupt, which means the history of careful, qualitative reasoning and feeling towards those subjects seems gone. This means that that has to be cultivated again, because it necessarily has to be, but it also means a new apprehensiveness towards the retention of new information. Again, a weakening of the faculties, a constructed impairment. This brain, now, acts not unlike a computer server, as if somehow, the neurons were network nodes (not nodes of Ranvier), and all of the sensory duties of the imagining brain were outsourced to a remote terminal. This means, for example, a thought is met with, incorrectly, insufficiently, a thought meant to be thought, perhaps–because functional-integrity is compromised–genuine, is distorted or otherwise presented as if controlled by a foreign catalyst, a facility with thought, with concepts, i.e. design, creative flourishes are intercepted physically, cranially, as much as that can resonate physically, and it’s changed into something that I believe corresponds to what the intruder believes is how a person thinks or means to think. This means that a premium, ironic, considering the possibility that this is of a technological source, is placed on control, not at all on the preservation of thought, or the possibility for general thinking, let alone advanced thought. Whenever an attempt is made to achieve a state of lucidity about the current circumstances, a punishment ensues in the form of blackmail, again social mutilation (anti-social behavior) or some other accusation of criminality or gross immorality. This may be the longest instance of sexual harassment I know in recorded history, as my penis is critiqued multiple times an hour, from flaccid to erect state. It abhors erection, like it’s alien or criminal. All of it is finessed to some degree by an ambiguity, in this case humor amongst other things, the use of interpersonal acrobatics, the continuous promise of a later reward. For instance, one of the things that happens, and this plays off of an already-intrusive guerilla marketing, data-mine marketing (likely a cover for pure harassment), is the establishment of a visual language that always to some degree points to something being advertised, a product you might potentially buy, which on its face is innocuous. But upon closer inspection, it does seem to gain accuracy with each attempt at subverting the feeling of even casual autonomy, any sense of self that comes from personal decision making. What this means is that over time a kind of probabilistic thinking ensues as a reaction to constant probability based harassment(e.g. Probabilistic Psycho-Linguistic Verisimilitude and Infinitesimal Approximations of Neuro-Physiological Reception in Experience Perception. Memory-Thought modulation analysis in the conversion of external stimuli into creative thought and output, partly through continuous tracking of parallel experiential or verisimilarly stimulated brains of a large population sample, and reward system increasingly tailored to positive correlative confirmation signs. Behavioral analysis through the continuous introduction of external and internal stimuli and continuous tracking of subsequent associated epistemological formulations especially in regards to the subsequent introduction of symbolically-associated stimuli, stimuli congruent with particular, personal, accurate or inaccurate epistemological assumptions.). This has the potential to render the target overtly spatially and socially strategic…which can cause irrevocable overt symbolic-interactionism brought on by among other things, helplessness: the methods of harassment are slight and mimic the symptoms of still socially-maligned mental illnesses such as schizophrenia. If you can imagine, an artist, especially one adept at symbols, abstract representation, is made to feel that he or she is responding to what vaguely seems like a phallic or feminine image, and he is, for example, then made to know that he or she is somehow influenced by that prompt to purchase which confirms his or her latent homosexuality, over time this admonishment, necessarily slight, acts as a kind of whip, to which an artist necessarily would respond to with a re-habitual sort of inclination towards the object he wishes to avoid, however ambivalent he might be. Over time the whip makes the artist, like Pavlov’s oft mentioned canines, salivate at the ‘sound of a bell,’ i.e. whip. This kind of harassment I think maybe tends to coincide with what would be a delicate time for an artist, or anybody, especially an inwardly focused artist or person, transgression bound, piqued by curious psychological phenomena, bouts of clairvoyance, synchronistic peculiarities, a lot to navigate through without the addition of systematic, injurious harassment. If for instance it can be said that a person who constructs by some act of fate, his own clairvoyance, a streak of running into exactly what’s foreshadowed as a relational need or otherwise a break from an ideal state, is monitored by someone from an objective point of view who has knowledge of human behavior and the journey of humans, artists, he could potentially be subject to this knowledge, general knowledge, the artists’ knowledge, what the monitor knows the artist knows, what he knows many don’t know about these phenomena, the limits of their efforts to remedy the issue, to include among other things what would be professionally or socially unhygienic to pursue, and particular knowledge of marketing or other forms of harassment to cause irrevocable psychological damage. It keeps a record like a fingerprint for every instant of short and long term audio memory, neuro-instantaneous-configuration, and also manipulation at the cochlear nerves, perhaps induced neuron degradation aided by an overly nitrogen-rich diet that allows sounds to be affected. Either neuron or nerve frequencies are altered to match incoming frequencies, pressure disturbances that create sound. That means that as fast as the speed of sound, an incoming signal is intercepted before a conscious sensation of hearing can be registered. Also communication from preparatory (internal) speech center can be altered to fit incoming signal, or to conform incoming signal to preparatory (internal) speech (i.e. Attempts to further resolve name to voice, signal to name, voice/signal to image...performs as if it may not have specific local knowledge of content, but effects of it, how a datum associates with another datum (e.g. what regional voice and statement placates, even if the value of a statement or effect is unknown--how that's measured, how it's configured, what it means against other data, for instance, if a communal-neuro-topographical map worked with all measurable phenomena associated with brain activity), a relational database, e.g. what might correlate neuro-physiologically to what’s known through data-mining (what an image might sound like, what an algorithm for what an image is like, what a person thinks an image correlates to, would attempt to resolve if it had to ascertain the locus of significance in service of connecting data-processing-of-ephemera to verisimilitude in external thought processing, increasingly how an algorithm could think for you, could be used to subvert reasoned conclusions, to make empirical inquiry or research, entertainment, compromise trusted academic sources for instance by playing to statistically known impulses instead of supplying objective findings, papers, objective search results.) Points to what I had written earlier though about conquest through earnest action and exploitation of assumed unknowns. Audio converted in real-time to legible probable English (what the word most certainly will be at the start of pronunciation) audio interpretation is augmented by visual symbol confirmation, i. e. when audio fails, or when audio may certainly fail to be adequately echoed. Appears to analyze cord vibration state, speech initiation, and compares that against a database and predicts usage in tandem with image analysis, which could be gathered from a databank of images (Bing "like" image search) and image/word-concept association. The process of instantaneous ranking, a number assigned to every possible word outcome given an initial vocal cord vibration state, or speech initiation state, say 200 words starting with 'Bal...' (Ball, balcony, ballerina, balances, etc.). The words are then ranked based on probability which can begathered from historical usage and altered by the microsecond, nanosecond, etc., as the vibration, speech initiation, word formulation further produces a word outcome, until the dwindles to one word, or the listener is trained to hear one word out of possible multiple words, the most probable word given priority amplification. This code can be improved ad infinitum, based on linguistic, probabilistic, psychological, and environmental factors.  A listener, possibly an operator on duty somewhere might correct machine code (?) as he notices errors in operation). Sound retrieved from temporary or long term audio memory, as well as the preparatory audio center is manipulated (enhanced or otherwise, modulated, withheld or diminished to produce effect.). Semantics, kinesiology and ephemera analysis, computational linguistics, linguistics itself, sonar, lip reading, etc. coupled with near-real-time incoming quantitative and qualitative data stream can all be used to induce the feeling of a second presence, a second set of eyes with you, and this is--if we were to assume that the data stream is coming from a witting or unwitting transmitter; perhaps an surreptitious or agreed upon installation of a transceiver on the person of the subject--without including the possibility for manipulation of the central nervous system, the frequency that governs or instructs, for instance, heart palpations, the perception of touch. A person could be outright impaired in various ways directly, or indirectly by, for example, stress, what are known as pain-points, if a cue were abusive, as in Pavlov's experiments with dogs, if a known involuntary, or voluntary made near-involuntary by conditioning were triggered to induce, for instance, a fetal-position defensive reaction. Where perception-valleys are present, neuro-experiential displacement is allowed to flourish, that means that with the aid of 'in,' a provincial cue, regionalism in terms of perceptual-familiarity, a person could be lulled into one form of intelligence, say the idea that a person is highly efficient at guessing various truths about your condition based on incoming data, but when the observers' analytical peak reaches a crescendo, possibly employing the infinitesimal, in terms of what can be gleaned, and as this contrasts knowledge of, a comfort level with previous analysis-attempts, a person could incorrectly conclude the 'real' presence of another entity. Audio-psychology, or other physio-neuro sensations can be used to create stories, especially if the belief-quotient of the participant/study/victom is high. Most people are not self-critical down to their neuro makeup, the particular universe of their mind and brain. Perception valleys, but for now, in as much as what's known about what it could know shows change modulated by location and some activity, for instance, a steady increase in rate of accuracy, or due to the fallibility of the senses generally but a known unreliability made increasingly more unreliable by sense-degradation, perception itself of this rate of change has to be called into question, as well as a perception valley, not only instances of impressions of what's known, but also for rates of change. While it can certainly be gleaned that some things are known (that had been, for instance, known to be unknown, in some cases unknowable particularly) and gleaned that some things are being increasingly known, there's still what's already known which is (x, unknown in quantity, quality, thus 0 to infinite, bad to extensive), and what's is increasingly being known that can't be known, that's changing at a rate that's congruent with known rates of change or not. Simultaneously, with that system there's a presentation of it, altruistically perhaps seeks partly, which may itself be a function of an outcome (to disinform, socially engineer some degree of.(cont.)..some degree of ambivalence, a familiarity with a signal presence to undercut the severity of what's being performed, to provide the illusion of a bevy of expected mercies, plethora of cognitive biases such as religious assurance by way of affiliation, assurance based on regionalism, etc. Mentalist tricks, and tricks such as game participation, match-maker, religion-based such as relieving you of talents buried, muscles not adequately used, which can lead to further illogical trains of thought.) to steer thought away from accurately assessing the scenario in general, the general nature of the problem, the specific nature of aspects of the physical problem, to attain a specific and/or general end through whatever can be suggested, including, as stated before, involuntary or near-involuntary responses to audible stimuli, which can provide new data. Other intrusive-(faux) inner-directed sensory cues can function in the same capacity. What's problematic, obvious, but needs to be made plain is that if more is known than prepared for or conceived, than more can be known based on responses to what's assumed to be known, for instance if internal functions of a subject are known, but the subject doesn't know that this is known, he will perform defense maneuvers internally, assuming that he is protecting something unknown. The information gathered from what’s newly known, now that along with internal functions known, the subject has unknowably provided, internal defense maneuvers, can be used to subdue another similar party or subject, or disarm the subject unawares, as they say, so that the subject's assumptions make him incapable of conceiving of a collapse externally orchestrated, thus attempting to solve an internal problem assuming an internal origin, not to mention, the peculiar conundrum that would arise if the subject knew what was known. Every response provides data, so nothing can be done, tactically, that wouldn't make worse the circumstances. If, what's known and had been known, for instance, is thought itself, an ability that would naturally need to be kept under-wraps, and along with thoughts known, thought processes, tendencies, probability, etc., now even a common sense response (silence, repose, a stalemate) is data, itself a maneuver. The continuum to some degree as much as feasible is the most appr. response. In terms of 'maneuvering' around this problem, what seems to me the most pragmatic approach is to, at the least, facilitate open communication (in qualitative proportions) relative to, or as a function of a rate of degradation of value certainties such as primarily the lived life, as much as valued the vital organs, the sustainment of societal functions. I.e. What can't be openly stated that needs to be has to be increasingly openly stated in measures where the positive difference (what's preserved) between what's stated and what's prevented by openly stating is optimal. In what can possibly take place, voluntary or involuntary reaction to perception valley nadirs (closest to truth, gravity), actual knowns could make more real unknowns, exacerbate the perception of a  truth, accuracy in reflected/echoed truth, i.e. a known thought known could make more real the perception of a thought known, causing a relinquishing of a hold, a defense due to that assumption, that something is definitely known, or a certain capability of knowing is certainly known. Or in not knowing a thought is known, a knowing center is known, a person could activate defenses that become newly known data, available to disarm. The knowing that's synthetic, that means to make real a data-mined synopsis of a history and now, as much as real-time reporting and application can be that, has approximated the sensation of knowing, as I've said before, so the physiological indication of what it means to have thought, or applying a thought, especially to some external prompt--itself made to seem internally orchestrated, yet an outside prompt, the idea that some other entity, at least the way I would dream of it, is supplying a question that requires an answer, an answer I'm willing to readily give: the neuro-physiological sensation that I am, in a semi-conscious state, the recipient of a question asked of me by someone not me, the idea that it has to be answered, and that the options available, the memory or knowledge bank known is what's actually there, and all that's there, the idea and correlating sensation that that answer is the right one, that I have thought that thought, the desire to interact, that the voice supplied is of the image it's associated with, and that the subject would communicate in this way as a matter of fact, the rendering of the image to, beyond the fact of it's value--how well it's rendered, which is desired to fall into a valley of non-consideration, a given too well constructed to be fully-appreciated in a way that allows for effect-reception  to subside and reasonableness to return tide and sufficiently critique--supply an increasing nudge towards what would be still not be a too unreasonable delusion of grandeur--of the grandiosity in each behavior of mine, as it's perceived, or some major failing of sense, that the elements of unconsciousness and visualization that would have to exist to make that point clear are what's actually there, and that that point made is one most salient, like a vacuum, that renders null excess-not-instantaneously-anti-thesis to what it means to convey, to make self-evidently true, that this is more than enough for completion--the sense of it that can guide, though, as I've written many years ago, truth and completion are separate things; one seeks conclusion when truth is tedious, and conclusiveness seeks truth when it's methodology and intentions are dubious, are questionable, to dress expedience, the rhythm of being undeniably-seemingly right or smart-sounding. But writing this, too, in a lucid wakeful state is subject to question, as I've left a state verifiably not my subconscious, the striving moment to moment is compromised as well, the certainty of whether or not impetus is genuine, has been eroded, outside of what's objectively, perhaps statistically sound in the findings of a most-reliable scientifically verified and peer reviewed analysis, and there's evidence that impulse itself, moment to moment, is directed by inauthentic catalysts--intentionally and directly orchestrated by some external source. What it could mean to allude to is simulacrum, but that's a psychosis term publicly. It's connected to weaving varying stories together that have 'no rights whatsoever' to be linked! Speed is not truth, nor is public consensus, nor is the spectre of utter demoralization and humiliation. In these conditions it's certainly difficult to objectively and somehow artfully probe into the idea of creation that seeks creation, or always in preparation of some future ideal. This is me inundated in another consciousness. The reasoning is now foreign, too. It has been that way for some time, but there's less of an obvious differentiation between the way I would feel about certain topics, even in sleep state that's barely leaving unconsciousness. The only way to maintain a sense of objectivity now is largely because of the nature of the thoughts themselves. Partly the game that's played here is rewarding the subject, in this case, me, with a right to healthy sleep, external peace through a decent lack of debilitating continuous sexual harassment, emotional abuse, discreet sexual and psychological assault, if I don't fight against diminishing qualitative thinking, which is preserving my identity. The continuous narcissistic drone that induces unhealthily defensive immediately rectifying mindset (of course at the expense of longterm planning and almost all deep, carefully considered thought). For instance, it continues as if there's some known secret violent, or sexually deviant behavior performed that has to come to light, of course through this style of torture. What it actually seems to be more and more is a conditional crime pre-punishment, a future-looking consequence based on inductive reasoning--ideally the crime, that, when this discreet torment has been completed, will, by its nature, have proven all of the tortuous actions taken upon me, just. But I believe this is based on a hunch that's arisen from the belief in congruence of data from a particular surveillance, even more daunting if that surveillance was coupled with conditioning by persons who would seek this outcome, the justification for that kind of surveillance and discreet torment then. This information, however,  doesn't prove the truth of any one act, only the perceived likelihood, perhaps in the court of public opinion, which isn't sufficient. The persuasion that's continuously transmitted is, in a semi-conscious state, even made to seem to be me at the gut of consciousness--i.e. what it would feel like, neuro-physiologically to think and know it's me thinking--slyly, disarmingly persuading someone else to follow a line of thought that's anti-thesis to what I'd most like to suggest, but it may actually fit in more with what would be congruent with the evidence that supports the truth of an instance of transgression, which is what's sought after. At this point, it's really only the fact that I don't think those things, that I don't consider that content and often thus(thereby) genuinely don't like it, that confirms for me, the foreignness of it. It does tend to resemble what's described by Foucalt in Madness and Civilization when he says that power itself takes this route regardless of the people who associate themselves with it, so that all persons in those positions that act as factors in this system behave as needed to support an outcome. In that book he describes three tactics the asylum-keepers use to sedate the subject, longterm*: silencing through ex-communication, through various means, ending regular social interaction; playing to, however belittling it is and beknownst it is to the subject, their idea of grandiosity, their belief of their superiority or deep importance, the delusion that they're a high-ranking official or royalty or a celebrity, whether or not they actually really feel that way, even if they only play along to someone else's suggestion; and the third escapes me, but it believe it has something to do with thwarting immediate goals. Fear is another tactic, or some kinds of trauma tantamount to what traumatic occurrence has caused an initial inhibition ( as flawed as that sounds), and the use of family-ties to persuade, to bring the subject to his right-mind, the definition of which is malleable as necessary like-wise, like what I had written earlier, to justify the tactics used, often what's sought is an ideal external to who the person actually is, an unchanged personality that's often only what it has to be to put loved-one's  minds at ease...for instance a person could finish school and be considered insane because, for example, school is ‘unnatural’ for his ilk (by way of his new knowledge he's writes or speaks like he aims to escape himself, or belittle rather than enlighten--usually the case when there's class-transcendence, when the actual numbers for progress are lost on an insular community, the national goal of education, or how education actually relates to affluence or career success, or gives a country it's competitive edge--generally preferred-- regardless of provincial opinions about individual cases), so a community could be persuaded, by the nature of their conditioning, to right the wrong of his enlightenment, to prevent continual learning, to, as overtly illegal and unethical as it is, seal off any chance for further naturally-resulting intellectual development. The problem in 2020 is that the knowledge of these conditions and disorders are known and that increasingly that knowledge is used to mislead the unwitting or support defamation or serve as peripheral intangibles used to wrong someone, i.e. it's weaponized. So street level skullduggery graduates and with the science of thought, there is increasing certainty, less error, so that the chance for something like this, an objective document, is less and less reliable. This might not be a reliable document. There could be for instance a gradual move towards planned happenstance, that secures planned outcomes. I had mentioned the systematic prevention of enlightenment or discreet impairment of the brain as it might be used for, for instance, discrete maths, or quantum mechanics, so lineage, documented familial inclination towards higher-learning, may more and more be seen as insurance against this. Gradually I'm made to become more and more comfortable with a second presence in mind, who, before any guarantee of compensation or noticeable benefit implores me to 'get out' or 'go up' or do a myriad of things as if I can, at will, make those outcomes happen, or as if the fact of my being or maturation isn't in itself, right, or self-evidently wrong. What it feels like, as I've stated before is rape, a marathon of rape-marathons, that itself forcibly becomes a new norm, and I'm responsible for my own pain, guilty for being violated, guilty for being hurt or protesting the rape-marathon in any way at any given time, especially if that protest gives some semblance of respite. The idea is to simply have it stop: I would like it to stop, I have never known this to exist, It was never a reality to me, I don't want it, I have nothing to prove. I only have to become more intimate with what I'm most interested in, and this something I can do without any help. The goal is the extensive depletion of the brain, mind, and eventually everything else. The prize, I believe, is what would strike a person who might encounter me, what would constitute a strength, and so one might like to see me or someone, for example, lose their ability to think in the way they are accustomed to thinking, especially if it's unique or adequate, or proven. Reasons can be as malleable as they have to be, to be sure I don't pontificate or don't mull over problems in the same way. There's an urgency in disrupting creation or thought production that reminds me of poverty-stricken children battling for crumbs or pieces of food, a certain scarcity-mindedness, or zero-sum, end-game, stubbornness. The chief goal here would be sabotage for highly-personal ego-driven reasons, not reasonableness. I'm made to believe that I should make some arbitrary authority my authority where there is none, and one is certainly not wanted or needed. There are large amounts of external stimuli present around me under the guise of helping me think. What this means is a demeaning attempt to forcibly outsource responsibility, which I believe is to make me comfortable with encroachment, especially to reveal private information, even information it is illegal for me to knowingly reveal, illegal for someone to forcibly extract from me, or frame me for relinquishing. Even as thoughts or thinking can be approximated, specific thoughts are more and more echoed in media, but not as general foresight or the synchronicity-high that follows a break from the ideal, a relational dependency, what state of being and thinking would have to take place to make sufficient meaning, or the actual events as genuinely foreseen meaningful encounters, but something else, almost as if I can't think unless each thought is good enough( this bypasses the feat of controlling each thought to even close to that extent to begin with), which they can never be if they're subjectively assessed, and goodness itself has to be questioned here if thoughts are more and more produced (which they are) by some far less adequate (for what I do) external transmitter, as preposterous as this sounds, the fact that I would ever have to consider a second presence in mind as a police for any reason. *The third here was constant references to the past--the asylum keeper would find a way to have the subject ensnared in his own past, which they could always refer to, if they've been keeping good notes, and the subject would ideally keep searching for some answer not readily given--partly due to an unkempt or unreliable memory in tandem with continual subliminal and overt cues to stop actively thinking--but instigated by past psychologically unresolved occurrences that are constantly urgently alluded to, one by one, until a certainty is achieved that further sedates the subject. Non-empowering recollection. More and more, in the morning and at other times, like in Iowa, in the morning, a foreign personality takes over, in the same way a foreign laugh did then,  a foreign consciousness, for instance what would be the way I would seem to go in a more generically paternalistic manner (and also paternalism or masculinity as brutishness, manliness as primitiveness), a voice less fluid, a word selection accounts for less nuance, which is even less refined than the initial incapacitation of the basal ganglia, other parts of the brain responsible for high level processing of concepts and a usual work-history-consistent manner of contemplation: what would work for flavors of contemplation, art-thinking for art-writing. More and more the spine is the outermost protruding part of skeleton behind me, the skull is continually pushed forward, the trapezoids are tightened and forced high along with my shoulders (to sit at the top of my torso not at the sides) and ass is coached to increasingly remain tucked under, the back is therefore elongated and bows outward like a bulldog where it approaches the neck(notes from earlier: There’s a constant incoming at a particular numerical rate, a transmission of the kind of stimuli that can’t be easily thwarted. One of the things this results in, or has occurred in this instance alongside it is an ever tightening of the muscles around the trapezius and upper latissimus dorsi, the sides and back of the neck. Quickly, it feels primitive, not in that a person who is muscular there is primitive, but that it feels like the option to deviate from that is increasingly gone. The top half of the skull increasingly sinks into the lower one, the eyes are forced close together than normal–it more and more resembles down syndrome. It feels like it, too. Due a lack of sleep, and again, continuous aggression the eyes are sort of recessed into darkened skin that sits inside the eye sockets. What I have now, what I use to make art is a kind of secondary vision, it’s a secondness  of vision. That sense is merely accessing footage, which I translate by way of recollection of what an ideal visual encounter was like. Again, the skull takes primacy, the eyes are a happenstance of the skull. My teeth are slowly reaching the beginning stages of brittleness, which I’ve seen happen quickly almost unnaturally to people I know.), a layman's cognitive consonance is expected to result from daily nudging to escape yourself, to 'leave your head,' as if leaning forward, an animalistic lean is what would make a person more himself. The overall goal is to completely disrupt bodily coordination. What this means, partly, is a conscious operation of the body to replace what should be thought-work, contemplation for interests and work, and other activities. The faculties are increasingly disrupted. Increasingly, simultaneously aptitude is compromised and replaced, the rate of intellectual growth is slowed, the quality of it increasingly less valuable, originality is directly minimalized as a result, and wherewithal for self-propulsion is increasingly made voluntary. The base-work of easy recollection, long and short term reflection, sign-creation, visualization, is forcibly outsourced, and all of it to mock all thought-processing as a means, itself, the reality of that depletion, to distract from an initial crucial loss of deep-meaningful consideration gained over time, through encounters, close-study, long-term deep careful-contemplation of the best that can be thought, for itself, it's own sake and as a foundation for future application. The brain is continually attacked, continually made to be atrophied object, as stated before, increasingly cadaver-centric. The body carries a head, an near-dead extremity, not a center. I'm made to reach, to partly consider at least as a fleeting thought the idea of my brain, my body and mind being diminished to enhance another life, of course, a life that hasn't worked for that reward and who boastfully will not compensate me for that depletion. The game here, as stated before, is to make a person believe many people are hiding from an anonymous machine that doesn't know who I am, and only plays to a person's ego (therefore a shameful thing to admit to being bothered by), their idea that this machine is referring to them and not some collective. The ego is conflated with thinking itself, it means to make the case that thinking, especially high-level thinking, or the way an educated person normally would think about his world, is only meant to nurture the ego. There's a lull in the machine's operation for continued thought-work and contemplation, but this is only to create the illusion of an order within this terror, and one the subject should subscribe to, an authority, where it would be most troublesome to a power-monger to not have one, where there should be none, a whip for thought where no whip is needed, an eye and narcissistic cloud for each thought, even after a major collapse of the faculties, the urgent establishment of an authority where it would only worsen not improve work. For every thought, there's its counter-thought, but not the specifically tailored counter-thought I'd employ to help me gain and retain healthy objectivity. Another game that's repeated here is the idea of inevitable competition, and a naturally occurring inevitable authority over that for the quality of thought a person possesses, logic with every thought, which is not my goal, and not desirable to me. By it's sheer presence, the authority expects forfeiture of sovereignty, not its own death. All of this is not the same as the carefully-tailored thinking I or any person might develop over time, that I have developed over time,  the specific way of dealing with people I've cultivated over time (both fallible but uniquely fallible), that's particular to me. This is an externally-orchestrated intrusion on internal space, that can easily be made to seem like an internally-originating mental breakdown. There's a narcissistic drone, that of course works against what it means to administrate over which is the worst of egotistic impulses, the most publicly despised by the most people, but this is accompanied by continuous manipulation of bodily sensations, neuro-physiology and even thought production. What this could easily appear to be to some unwitting person watching is a person struggling with undesirable impulses and characteristics, a person who needs professional help. For instance, if an external presence is forcibly coaching a person to think of murder, in tandem with manipulating the brain, mind and body to viscerally feel that impulse at gut level, that external presence, now internally situated, would taunt or shame a person for even thinking along those lines which would be especially difficult to manage for a person who clings to moral standards. This person witting could perform a myriad of exercises to regain equilibrium, perhaps include that in a daily routine, but a person unwitting could be tragically set back by this constant shaming, which could erode at their form, their freedom amid granted societal freedoms, inalienable rights, or slavery amid all of the resources available for assuring freedom. The shaming would exacerbate impulse, which could lead to impulse-fulfillment. It means to diminish all strengths and not as germaine to some lesson or attempt to target someone else, and it means to outsource all thinking, all facility with various functions, all of the faculties, that are healthy and in some cases above-average.  Each day the ability to clearly speak  is more and more compromised. My facility with language is increasingly minimalized. Word selection or word memory as needed to sufficiently convey exactly what pertinent is compromised. The ability to convey nuanced thought is diminished, as an echo of actual loss of nuanced thinking. I get the strange feeling that the voice I'm left with is that of someone who makes bold pronouncements, as if drunk in grandiosity, that I would be given over to, as I've said before, delusions of grandeur, however congruent they might be with my actual experiences--not as a celebrity or a politician. The main point is that whereas before I would simply focus on the concept to be conveyed and language-usage-facility was subordinated as needed, now, more and more, I have to be sure speech is accomplishable, and I have to prepare for unpredictable preparatory-thought-failures in regards to overall poignancy and particularly individual word usage to reduce uncertainty (to minimalize latent egregious misinterpretation), and so where it may seem to be the case that one would gain a noticeable benefit from relinquishing conceptual wherewithal in service of immediately detectable thus resonant linguistic dexterity, that soon gives way to another voice less refined (less directed) and perhaps therefore less resonant, or perhaps additionally to some other less easily detectable benefit, e.g. pure (quality) thought for pure (quality) experience, not that the two are always mutually exclusive (that one couldn't be the other). Part of this erosion, I think, has to do with the idea that reality, real-reality is only gained through eschewing internal order, a private order, especially one that allows for deep healthy careful contemplation, reflection and  foresight--even if only with definite plans and timely responsibilities in mind.  As if dreamscape was a reliable window to some truth, it's treated as if all of its admissible in some invisible court, but what's manipulatable is imagery, like I said before the way a newly wakeful state, a state just before pure consciousness can yield the crest of inhibition, what dreams address mostly abstractly, especially as deep as orchestrated externally based imagery can be planted or seeded by mentalist cues. More and more the deepest unconscious whimsy, what's uncontrolled, is made to bear externally orchestrated fruit, or what can persuade or suggest at the base level of thought, especially in as much as it subverts structural integrity. Even if by only a delay in the body's reaction to the brain's signals, physiological sensations that sometimes accompany dreams, not that that's in anyway whatsoever a punishable offense itself (for instance an erection at the sight of a necrophilia orgy, at bestiality or something worse), can be manipulated to train personal tastes, or supplant the bedrock on which one might stand to declare something from a rightful or righteous as well as a reasonable standpoint. This might not seem like much if it weren’t for the fact that it's accessible, and especially to an unwitting subject, it could seem to be omniscience through authority, which could turn noble but, perhaps albeit reluctantly,  strict adherence to morality, a kind of torture. A person who wanted to fully assume authority over a person could use this to control behavior over time, especially in an environment where morality is a kind of currency, the feeling of it, the feeling of goodness, a person's sense of his own deep piousness, or the way it's perceived by others. This could be disrupted to sway other people or make some point to a subject about the limits of how he can feel about himself, or a point about what a subject ought to feel about himself, given what's 'apparent,' what’s 'obviously' known. Their aim is for me to be aware on their terms, to see my own particular trajectory, the awareness I've cultivated, the style of thinking I've developed, nearly the only way to be that would suffice for seeing me through to this point, as wrong in itself, without justification needed for that final judgement, that certain prosecution. I'm blacklisted. Again, freedom is taken from me at a crucial point in my life, and I can't get those years back. I'm attacked by a transmission that reads thoughts, and certainly does so. This is a weapon of war. It's masked as probability, but that's not what it is. It prevents me from starting a viable business, and it rids me of every worthwhile idea. I can't pray. I'm made to viscerally experience consenting to inferiority, or recognizing a superiority that's made to seem true-in-itself, that's above empirical inquiry. More and more each morning it's difficult to articulate what exactly is taking place as immediate recollection becomes weaker. The sensation of being a host for another presence, another consciousness becomes more and more visceral, as if, for instance, the way I could know, neuro-physiologically, what it means to be myself, to be me knowing, was overtaken each time I slept. This is something I only somewhat consciously detect when I wake up, and it's a realization that's increasingly forgettable, like a temporary bout of Alzheimer’s, as much as memory could be a mood, an aphasia for short term memory. I can't remember exactly what was said, but it involved me remembering a date and conveying that to someone, but now more than any other time, the date recounted, and all of the sensation of knowing was present, as much as a person could think to know something or arrive at a conclusion, work through a problem logically, the sensation of the way the mind functions when it rationalizes. A date was given by me to someone who asked for it, but the date given was different then what I could glean from another channel of communication which was also not generated by me, even with the way I know I present images in a dream, another channel, both foreign, presenting two problems. One problem is the problem of simulacrum, the idea that a problem exists to begin with, that the environment is mine, that there's a problem that's mine to remedy. The second problem is that there's one channel that isn't privy to the other, and is determining perhaps by probability what it must be like to receive a sort of para-communication and communicate back, but failing at the transmission of specific data points. So, there could possibly be another channel of communication that's there subconsciously, the one induced by some outside coach, the subconscious machine code, one I don't consciously know, that's made to respond to this other unbeknownst to it, incoming channel with as much verisimilitude  as possible, the way a person who  has to parity check or verify a secure channel could read into what it has known about the way my neurophysiological behavior would correlate to a transmission. As much as it might seem to be exceptional to communicate in this way, especially for a truth that has to be weaved into a kind of persuasion, even when that means nothing at all, the correlation between the way something is said, the means of saying it and the truthfulness of it, I only get moments of possible relevance, that it's not all gibberish. Mostly, though, it's still persistent verbal assault that's optimized over time combined with a more and more accurate appraisal of my surroundings and physiological states, neurophysiological states, even thoughts, as images that are produced by me, made to be seen as I see the world (so perhaps an interception as a catcher's mitt back there for the way I see, as much as that can be thought or correlate to thought, but more and more it seems that the way this is known is by what could be gathered through large number analysis, the sample that a image-focused search engine would have to have, to...at one instance, say 'this image is like this one, so therefore this image might likely be this one,' especially the way this could work for facial recognition, and, on the other hand, the way words can correlate to imagery, so the often searched images as they correlate to words could coach AI machine code to know an image means this word, which it could stylistically, using a regional voice, say. There's also what correlates to image neuro-physiologically, that near-instantaneous and recordable state that can serve as one datum entry in a library, a relational database for image-text-neurophysiological correlation. This can be married with content recognition by an actual human observer, who by less and less of an imperative needs to coach the machine on what to know, especially for an increasingly large number conforming population, perhaps the erasure of inner-directedness, but certainly the reduction of micro-decisions, or at least the weight that each one of those might hold, the complexity of that with recollection, reminiscing, self-perception, self-awareness, and likewise all of the different types of awareness and sensations, especially in as much as that could disrupt the accuracy of large number assessments in an age where big-data is oil, where data is currency, and as much as that adherence to large number data, perhaps a cousin of the natural human tendency to conform to technology, as much as that reduces the likelihood for genuinely differentiate-able creation, the ability to work in that capacity, idea creation, and safeguard it, becomes increasingly valuable. So what seems to be playful in mind, the wackiness of preventing all of the myriad of ways a person could perceive the world or contemplate it, a steady stream of base-communication, only wide-eyed, exaggerated reactions, for one--that diminish sound outlook, that counters little moment-to-moment realizations, and sparks of self-perception or self-adulation, and past savoring, etc.--is not valuable in the sense of working with concepts, the elements of sensation to create ideas. Yes, as deplorable and disheartening as that sounds, there does exist work to dismantle thinking itself-to-demoralize, which is tragic for most professionals who actually need to contemplate to get work done. There are people with the means to demoralize people in that way--know what a person is thinking, which could mean something if it were a way to say something about the score between the two: the continuous encroachment on thought by the technological world and them, and use that to say the people’s thinking, which might largely make up who they are, is grossly redundant, thus useless--and if demoralization isn’t the goal, inherent illegality of this method notwithstanding, they might not appreciate why and how working through problems unaided, unhampered, with pinging faculties, often yields the raw substance of individual wherewithal (the numbers might point to documented aptitude, verifiable performance as more certain predictors of meaningful thought-work, but there’s evidence of crucial high-level innovation resulting from the later-perfected peculiar-mindedness of once-crude thinkers) which is important because it is infact so often the road enlightenment and inquiry takes, which civilization tends to trail. Considering that much more than what's obvious to me could be known by what's causing this, for at least image recognition, as I've said before, the way a search engine algorithm could link image to words or image to image, an arrangement, the means of detecting image production as it's received by my brain, how it would have to resonate physically, the elemental matter associated with it, and how that would have to correlate to at least what's analogous to an analog-to-digital way of having a non-human instrument interpret with increasing accuracy the actual content there, if we assume what's being felt, followed by what's seen is genuine, and not externally-originating orchestration ( assuming no manipulation based on  raw data configuration, a coordinate assignment of each datum, the way that can be recorded and retrieved and over time correlate to meaning, health states, later behavior, entelechy, etc.). It's possible coordinates could be known within axis, a spatial verisimilitude in the way an thought would be orchestrated by a person, basically how a person would conventionally think, at least. If, for instance, it could know the way sensation, the way the brain reacts correlates to a type of image, e.g. a face, within that category, it could reference a library of images that are categorized based on tendencies in appearance that would better ascertain content, so only as much as facial features lead to more certainty are they categorized, in this case, the certainty of what correlates to thought, the way thought could be known with increasing accuracy. So what takes place is prompt in the form of a playful improv on image production awaits confirmation in the form of 'yes' or 'no,' the behaviors that fall under those categories, to know what seemingly ambivalent behavior is ultimately revealing, the way Charles Pierce (W. James?) posits there is no lie. Once the confirmation is received it becomes a brick stacked in service of certainty, the later improvs are more accurate, executed with confidence, for instance an animated image after once thought as static when probability is above perhaps 95%. It could be that in some cases only temporal disposition is known as it's associated with image after an image is thought, a one-off image produced and then externally manipulated, the following thoughts as much as disposition points to this, are perceived to be likely to follow the same pattern, so another face could be perceived by the machine, but in not knowing who the face is immediately or having in that following instance the capability to 'recognize' the type of face, it prioritizes a moment of possible continued follow-on manipulation with an animation like before, one that correlates to an old man, as opposed to say a cheerleader. There are supposedly recorded occurrences of ESP, phenomena, or technology that transfer another person's mind into another person, that would allow for a kind of symbiosis that could carry out this flavor of mischief. In the quanta-age, the one that follows this one, the data-age, it might be said that nothing could be known to be truly debunkable without knowing that, the entirety of circumstances, even though we know in theory one realm, the subatomic doesn't significantly disturb the other, 'reality' as such. If this is all quanta-sized, all physical matter as quantity, then it's possible that all that could be known, quantified, would adhere to principles of probability in as much as an understanding of the movement of  gas, vapors, could be optimized, I mean, the way that led to this, to what would seem to be todays understanding of the way subatomic particles work. This could know in exponentially large magnitudes, all of the varieties of living, all of the scenarios a person might encounter that would re-introduce agency, only eluded by infinity, which I've stated before is problematic because of what it suggests, that there is a world so much like our own, that it has to be us (if this were not the case, then according to what infinite entails, then an Earth or a 'me' exactly the way I am now that would have to stop just shy at whatever difference would have to exist to make it not me, would negate the idea that this is not in some way finite, there would have to be an infinite just like infinite minus the smallest possible liminal quantity it takes to make this possible, a physical quantity that both exists and doesn't exist, exists and doesn't exist only as a function of this system--that there has to exist an exact duplicate of infinite or more within all of the nearly-identical copies of it, which would still not define existence as finite, the way that infinite would seem to need to be the case from a linear causal standpoint (Ephesians in the Bible, for instance, says men are not wont to reconcile a beginning and an end of existence), a particle would have to be 'newness,' enough to differentiate one infinity from the other but not enough to mean the two aren't the same, exist as what's not to be copied but also does not exist, the universe in how it functions would have to be always in the process of becoming itself, like a rising yeast as it's cooked, as experienced by someone who could only experience that in increments, like an electron that travels along a copper wire, not an external view of all states imaginable, every possible outcome, perhaps the way it actually is, the way we view a copper wire as opposed to the way an electron does.). There's an assumption that an externally originating transmission wouldn't know to work with a person's sensitive understanding of the way he communicates intimately with other people and to himself to arrive at a desired conclusion, so one would first have to assume in this case an alien-to-self-entelechy that understands this, that would have this understanding to do this, to cause mischief, or that an entity would know this is the path of least resistance, with no value intuition, not even finely tuned, only using knowledge of perhaps neuronal configuration, each one like a fingerprint instantaneously and what that tends to correlate to. There are simple filters for processing thinking that could cause large perceptual shifts just based on that, neuro-physiology, like a delay in thought, which I've stated above, an externally-based orchestration of the fundamental way a person thinks. Even now there’s more thought as murkiness in terms of recollection of what it's like to carry on with a line of thinking with the knowledge that what's thought is what intended to be thought or that a branch of thinking, what would follow what in terms of how I'd most like to state a truth, the easiness of stringing together words that would make a sentence that personally rings coherent, and more of smartly timed cues to suggest the inevitability of all of it, as if it was normal to think wrongly, as I've never thought before, like. for instance, it's a foregone conclusion that my mind is imminent domain; a voice cuts in with something that sounds like a intercom. The knowing center, especially objectivity as a base is continually compromised (one way you could approximate the gist of what's taking place, is if you could imagine this was of the utmost urgency, that for example, a person needed to know for certain that what I've made or some core part of me was exceedingly discreditable for sure, the way a person  who has assumed his own superior rightfulness would have to save face for projecting onto an artwork for instance his own foibles and vices, hang ups and inhibitions). It could be that I'm being told something, but on the face I get nothing of definite value informationally but what would seem to be the goal for someone who needs to save face and can't do it, or is faced with the specter of it, a gradual depletion, everything that could be done in this span of time to creatively rewrite my conspicuous trajectory of making art for decades, having had made art for that amount of time and attending high school and college specifically for that. This is mostly taking place in the theatre of semi-consciousness, and it’s still performed as an ongoing court, which is problematic when this internal narration of external and internal meaning is epistemologically attuned, more and more knowing what it would take for me to believe or how it feels for me to know what I'd most like to reasonably think. By way of this, saliency is reduced. The feeling of knowing and thinking what I'd most like to think, and communicating that way is compromised. This saliency is difficult for me to achieve without sanctuary, an actual private or peaceful space in mind, a few minutes, within several years, of actual quiet, the actual guarantee of no added presence or accompanying voice, as well as--if at all recoverable--the feeling of knowing I'm alone in thought to contemplate what I'd most like to, through to completion, especially as much as it fits in with my artistic goals, through to satisfaction. As a side note, there's a tuft of muscle at the base of skull situated behind the ears that's increasingly bulky, and, as much as it's served as a barrier for it in the past notwithstanding, it does now, more and more, prevent the jaw from settling into an involuntary state, the mouth as it happens to a lot of us is overly worked, especially in those times that can last when I have to mouth what I'm meaning to say before I say it, to prevent egregious misspeaking or overly erroneous logic (In Strunk and White’s bestselling ‘Elements of Style,’ a book still in heavy use today, this is introduced as a technique to improve writing, so I’d imagine many millions of people still do this.), but I think this also has something to do this wakeful state, the continuous disruption of healthy sleep and this other thing, the entities we wrestle with, the externally-originating incoming that’s sent, as well as ourselves. The reaction animations are randomized and then made to seem significant. The follow-on statements are often directly proportional in emotional gravitas to the instantaneous belief response, the nearly-involuntary or involuntary one. An image of a known subject is shown, projected, and a follow-on animation is meant to indicate something permanent, some record of fact, like a how a person might deal with what's going on now (If you can imagine how much that could bring a subject into a state of comfort, the way Foucalt said that might occur after being treated in an asylum.), what's happening to me, symbolically, a gesture that's means more than what it is, which further inculcates a person in overly reading behavior as sign, to further eschew healthy selective awareness and selective observation. It's a basically magic 8-ball toy that becomes increasingly more apt over time, so that more and more the indications of randomness, the differences between how a person knows what’s believable as symbolically pertinent and what's orchestrated are diminished over time. This is exacerbated by external and internal cues to believe more, to contemplate less. The capacity for extended careful contemplation is reduced significantly within the first contact, and is almost lost completely a short time after that. It would think it would be nearly-impossible for the undereducated, underaged, disabled to be aware of what's taking place as it's happening. This is how a I imagine it would work: a list of options is run against a list of identifiers associated with each documented sensation. When one sensation registers, it's linked with an identifier, this sensation could be one of reflecting on someone of importance, possibly an influencer, a sub-identifier or subset of identification code could link this to a internal sense cortex, such as a visualization. This sensation and this image is connected to a symbolic animation option such as a turned head for a portrait. What then exists is a record of this projected image and this follow on animation option. I think the other possibilities for follow on animation are subtracted save for what would be most antithetical to a person's values, how a person would most like to think, so that over time as the same sensation is produced with it's associated image, the chances for thinking any other way but a way that points to a follow-on animation is diminished, especially when all other ways lead directly to the most antithetical thought. With images there appears to be, like I said before, an initial identification of what can be gathered to be what's sensed visually, by what's actually seen, what's visible in the visualization cortex, and what can be determined via datamining, especially if it's real-time data-mining or surveillance in general. In this instance there's what's identified based on image association, such as the way a code could determine what values and colors and facial features are displayed and what that's normally associated with...In this case, there's an association that might reveal that not much can be gleaned by listening other than perhaps sonic vibrations or a description that guides others, or what a person would like to think about the way this is working out, for instance, that a way of communication must always be kept in mind or enough to neutralize focus, the way a person would normally engage or go about doing whatever it is that he'd most like to do, especially if it's what has always been done. It seems to access pre-auditory cortex production of what would be sound to me, that's as much as possible not connected to cord vibration production of sound, so is able to reproduce, in a linguistic sense, what would constitute a phrase. It employs oralism to become increasingly adept at lip reading, so that an image's production of the appearance of a person talking is met with real-time congruence, i.e. speech that's naturally camouflaged with moving lips, with increasingly accurate English regionalism, so this points to an image capturer that is capable of processing many states or all possible states of speech production as it's seen by a person watching a person speak. The fact it might be more difficult to translate what would take place without having that vantage point, a frontal viewpoint as opposed to any other way makes me believe it's still in development. But what this also points to is an image capturer that works strictly with that, with say how a cord vibration might resonate visually on an RF spectrum analyzer or some other signal detector, the disturbance of a wave, the presence of a signal amongst noise and how that's altered to match specific points of speech production, such as what would correlate to an 'Ah' sound or a 'Juh' sound. I mentioned before about how a program could reference a dictionary of words associated with the evolution of cord vibration states, as the word develops, and that's optimized, the way high frequency trading works, so that for basketball, the first part of that word 'ba' would-open what would be the widest possible field for this word, words that start with 'ba,' and as that word's produced, following with 'sket' to produce 'basket,' the reference field becomes increasingly smaller, if you can imagine sand in a once top-heavy hour glass, this is the way it would work. So, by the time 'ball' is reached, the speed for correlating signal-to-word is near-instantaneous, or perhaps balancing as much as possible, offsetting what would seem to be a delay however slight at first recognizing and accurately matching visual-cue-to-word, so that by the time the image-to-word operation has been completed, all measurable perceptions, as much as possible, point to seamlessness. Of course, this all points to ominous possibilities for this kind of technology, like all readable sensations, as much as they can be detected, correlating to some kind of data, that's later compiled into information, sometimes information or just raw data that can be used to perform some task, sometimes made to be instantaneous reflex. So, as much as phenomena is data, this could be narrated as it occurs, or as much as narration understands the conditions for perception of phenomena and each correlating subsequent reaction, shortterm and longterm, actions taken by a subject can be predicted with increasing accuracy. And as much as this understanding--how legible information can be, and how intimate an actor can become with that information--can be used to act on a subject, discreet or overt actions taken upon a subject can be adjusted to produce a desired outcome. What seems to be the case with image recollection or if and when this is the case, an immediate foreshadowing of a action very soon to be taken, what seems to transpire is image production as much as possible is outsourced to this externally-originating orchestration, that means increasingly an impulse to reflect or foreshadow, is not coupled with an authentic near-involuntary produced image but an amalgam of an intended image and an externally-originating orchestrated one, or the externally-originating orchestrated one altogether. This could mean that as much as possible, as much as it achieves the perception of seamlessness, the absence of any sense of change in this basic function, images are instantaneously produced (the way that speed is perceived, what would constitute instantaneousness in a subject, i.e. as fast as thought, or usually how fast an image produced would respond to that associated impulse.), images and animation orchestrated by an externally-originating source are possibly synced with what would be the elements of that construction, and in the same way that words are detected by registering the evolution of cord vibration states, the evolution of thought as an image produced could be tracked then intercepted with a melded image--the butt end of a curtailed one, or entirely different image altogether. As much as movement can be determined by some close-read kinesiologically based prediction (that seems to work with a library of lifestyle and cultural content that would most likely correlate with temporal body states and sensations, like the changing consistency of surfaces and materials as they’re sensed, even if just the memories of those touches, what they mean in particular contexts, what a change in touch, the memory of one means for a narrative, the way that’s forcibly illustrated, and other sources of incoming data, like audio, etc.), an intended action, the one meant to be foreshadowed is displayed with increasing succinctness for both motion and image-accuracy, even if in the vein of mockery--possibly, decreasingly, a cover for a lack of actual capability in response time, rendering, animating, and the certainty of a lasting impression of seamlessness, that the thought produced is my own, tricking me into believing that the thought-work it takes to visually conceptualize has been minimized (...an increasingly apt seduction into weakening that natural but also painstakingly-strengthened capability) . As far as the evolution of cord vibration states goes, it seems this capability works best when the subject is at a standstill, when positioning is ideal. This could mean this capability reverts back to conservative operation if it has been predicting the outcome of a future statement based on a prompt for a response, the probability of an action most likely to take place, based on data already collected, and positioning is no longer ideal, especially when a body is in motion. This means adjustments for the evolution of cord vibration states are conditional, i.e. what would likely, first, be word production detection, followed by the identification of which word would most likely follow. Over time, a library of phrases might be compiled and referenced based on circumstantial context along with neuro-physiological states, physiological states, and this would be insured with conditional word production, as each word further confirms the likelihood that a particular statement will be made  i.e. sounding based on the evolution of cord vibration states and the data associated with it, the statistical likelihood that a word will be produced based on incoming data. When a subject is in motion and cord vibration states are difficult to detect and thus predict, this system seems to err on the side of a continual second presence, a continuum in the mind and ear of the subject, so that it attempts to match a predicted phrase, vice a repeated one, to the subjects internally-originating phrase, based on the data it has available: first, the most likely phrase to be produced based on circumstantial context--externally-originating stimuli, or an externally-originating prompt for a response, followed by the insurance of this, what would most likely further reduce ambiguity, the decreasing likelihood that this phrase won't be produced, based on the evolution of cord vibration states. But when detection fails, when it's most likely to occur--when a subject is in motion, when there's attenuation, a power outage, etc.--it is possible for an externally-originating near-real time veri-simulation of a subject's speech production to differ from an internally-originating phrase produced by that subject, especially as a subject varies word selection within adhering to the likelihood that a particular phrase will be produced, i.e. beginning a phrase with words that fit that likelihood. It's possible that what could be identified as pre-auditory speech, or what neuro-physiologically would constitute audible thought can be repeated back near-instantaneously, or with what the most statistically and linguistically sound response would be, that would work in the context of what the nature of a given phrase would most likely be. The likelihood a repeated phrase is fit might be increased over time through involuntary physiological confirmation, so as much as possible, especially with modulation and repeater delays, an increase in seamlessness, a diminishing perception that a second presence is  artificial. This is the same process used with internally-originating image production to counter all internal dialogue, peculiarity of thought, especially carefully considered contemplation. This morning was the furthest yet I had been semi-consciously another self. That means for as much as consciousness could be that without being that, I was thinking and speaking in mind as someone else, a commentary that's fluid even though it's incongruent with what I'd most likely think and what I'd most like to think. So, before and after that state was the experience of, as much as I can pinpoint, me as I should be, but in between those times was an action as much as it can be that at rest, in a semi-conscious state that was not originated by me. There's still no way to tell if more can be done to curtail wherewithal within me, any remnant of any genuine agency. Even after that, was a snack of a meal, a bowl of cereal, eaten with the facial muscle-memory of another, like another person altogether minus a consciousness that follows a tendency to reason in a certain style, the way I'd usually like to ascertain things.  And furthermore on the previous day, while even approximating these unusual occurrences, the mind went the way it would sometimes do in the past--but for past reasons, hinder even the basic work of reason, documenting observations, and sufficiently capturing the function of this encroachment. Thought those notes might seem to be the same as always, yesterday, they were a laborious chore, like building a wall. More and more the mind is bludgeoned with unwavering abuse, like I said before, everything that would diminish strength, or work against anything that has always worked in my favor. I haven't been alone in mind for some time now. I haven't prayed or reflected alone now for some time. I haven't read a book alone for a while, for at least a few years. I’ve been unemployed for over ten years. There's no way to convey to the people around me that this is unnatural. They seem to succumb to what might be a kind of universal spectre of shame for me, for some reason, that at every turn, at every point of rightful repulsion at this continual violation, even at the bud of impulse, I might be forced to reveal, to the chagrin of loved ones or the most highly-respected and treasured keepers of our collective becoming selves, with their looming non-budging judgement, a deviance that would mar my name with what my obituary would most likely have to avoid alluding to, or some other reason, a communal goading at the interpersonal level of interaction or perhaps an amalgam of little concessions of inferiority, that a man should be bludgeoned just cause, just because of what's obvious, some evidence that would be sure to emerge, even if only in the mind of everyone that that needs to be in mind of, what would have to make-sense to make that case, to avoid the socially unhygienic prospect of declaring someone is being wronged by a lot of people, that a lot of people are wrong, even a lot of people we like or love. This could be happening to them, too, the people around me I'd like to convey this to. Though I might not be able to accurately determine to what degree in the past or the immediate past when I was addressing a particular object in way that would betray infact what was before me, it seems that it's possible for this to be known to an outside observer, but to an observer who would have a difficult time making that final determination as to what, given a 1:2 chance of guessing correctly, I was referring to infact. It would seem that as much as this is compromised--the degree to which I could correctly make a determination involuntarily or other wise, nearly such, about the fact of what I was observing--an outside onlooker reading that language--the kinesiology of me, the neuro-physiology of me--might need a level of certainty above, say, 60% or more for a true or false supposition. What would seem to take place is that given the uncertainty of that sensation in regards to how it might correlate to the truth, this outside observer might err on the side of verbal confirmation, especially if that confirmation has historically meant the strongest likelihood of truth. So, what could happen is that when multiple modes of communication are collected and interpreted, priority is given to one mode of communication over the other ( e.g. instead of the two taken in tandem and given the same weight of pertinence) when the accuracy of either is subpar, when the two contradict each other, or they convey different types of information. And because, like I said before, the program seems to stick with a continuum, a continuous second presence, no matter what, a error can last, I believe, until new data prompts an information review that changes that. But even in this case when new data is available, the program might empty something that would seem logical, soundly tactical like two follow-on actions that cover the possibility for both outcomes a true and a false. What may be happening is the program is at times assuming a non-human subject when this happens, or a poorly coded definition of what would constitute a human subject,  and so assumes nothing will seem amiss when a subject would naturally seek experiential consonance, but only if the outside actor is aiming for seamlessness and not necessarily-detectable-mischief. Whereas before what had only seemed to be conditional response to the evolution of cord vibration states is now a direct response to thought content as it's communicated in the pre-auditory cortex (preparatory speech or dialogue connected to conceptualization), the suppression of all sensation of saliency, the healthy operation of the brain and mind, or what thought-work is like when it's in an optimal state, the neuro-physiology of it. The goal here would seem to be the inner most point at which thought resonates. The problem this outside actor seems to have is a problem of ownership of the thinking process itself (not a particular one), a personal intellectual pursuit, the inner-most sensational highs of empirical delight, meaningful reflection, the maturation of creative thinking, and the extreme clarity and succinctness that I've known, at times, when I reason, as crazy as that sounds. It continues to communicate that it's wrong for me to think, or that thinking especially as it goes for my ethnicity (or social-economic status) in this country--which is interesting considering my ancestors and all of the work that has gone into silencing their intellectual voice, or breeding out intellectual wherewithal--is not a native past-time, and so this is hate crime. Now that it has snuffed out privacy to the furthest extent yet, it communicates that all empirical inquiry is useless for me, and for that matter it seems to want all of existence to be viewed as only a material conquest, where, of course, I only take instruction, grateful to be paid. Seems like: Something that behaves as a transceiver in me, that's solar powered, that receives code that runs elsif statements that increasingly respond to the entirety of physiology of the infinitesimal, and it varies the degree to which it reveals this to me. Some code is stored and run in a simpler state, a local code in me, when not in receipt of a transmission, which is revealed when I am out of the way of transmission, e.g. when underground, going through a tunnel, in an underground aquarium, on a high-speed rail or subway train, and sometimes on a plane. It sometimes goes away completely during a storm or heavy overcast, or it’s attenuated, disrupted, as if an incoming stream of data they receive that’s continually interpolated, continually made informational is now unreadable. This happens with power outages as well, black and brown outs, which makes me think about electromagnetic emissions. Whatever new behavior I perform that's not readily documented by a reverse transmission, e.g. behavior underground, is interpolated through probability and 'question and answer' confirmation sequences in the form of sensual cues and my para-responses, nearly involuntary or exactly that. Uses timing of bodily functions to predict moments of significance, how a mind might still make folk-sense out of physiological changes, to disrupt sense, experiential-traction for later or instantaneous use in reasoning, by, for instance, modulating the natural sound a digestive system might make, a stomach growling, to mimic actual bestial groaning, a sound that's congruent with what we'd might like reason those organs could make in the realm of possibility. Continually exacerbates anterior-stance defensive mindedness by increasingly more succinct suggestive and incisive verbal or image cues, that might advertise or blend well within sensed stimuli, or are cued based on newly data-rich information, whose goal is to sever all internal and external ideas of social cohesiveness that includes me, a cohesiveness that continues, that's a reality outside of the reality I actively know. This could possibly be happening while an actual external social program is in place to exile me, to ex-communicate me, to actually sever those relationships, or the inverse, to strengthen them, possibly by a means made to seem to be working against that goal, to me. (elusive gap in communication, i.e. a kind of blackmail, that can't be known to me, due to the gravity of a deed, the perceived reality of it, as much as the crux of believability could be known, more than what's normal for above-average thinkers, e.g. if it could be known that knowing stomach groan would be reasoned to be a gut-knowing, that because that's the locus, that's the truest in the same way the most expensive, creative, or heartfelt mode of communication could be assumed to be the most truthful or true at all.) Whatever physiological mechanics takes place that causes that reaction, the chemical way, for instance, that could happen, could be induced as much as that could be a dopamine high, a reward for that gesture...If the signals the brain receives through the nerves that tells it how the body is feeling could be intercepted and modulated, then a number of physiological tales that exploit the folk-sense knowing bodily functions could be told to create an alternate physiological reality, also as much as nerves control bodily functions, this could be used to actually harm the body. It seems to have been used that way for me and is still being used that way, so I'm a victim of assault, a crime that's still happening...The code would have to be deployed with a large data spatial sample of cranial space and how sound heard tends to resonate, and once implemented, a spatial-tuning through a 'question-and-answer' confirmation sequence and thus more accurate sonic verisimilitude--what a sound  is like as it's heard by a subject. As I've stated before, if the cochlear nerve frequencies could be modulated before they reach conscious listening, if the pre-auditory cortex, the signal that that generates, could be used to modulate incoming sound, the cochlear nerve frequencies, and if the sound that's stored in long term memory could be modulated, all of that could be used to further manipulate perception or a folk-sense of bodily functions, especially neuro-physiology..   Worst case scenario: various auto-code a.i. machine code intelligences, each one coaching the less sophisticated one it subordinates, perhaps increasingly less coached at the apex by a human who never gets worse at understanding what he knows about machine code, but can glean what a subject knows in general by how a subject manages this conundrum, and he can work to know more of what that person knows and surpass that, of course. As this process degrades the intelligence of the subject, the machine code is more perceived to be close to the subject, to be an entity, and so thus the problem of perhaps returning to a state of intellectual equilibrium or to the convincing ambivalence that accompanies objective observation becomes more difficult as time goes by and the process takes its natural course, especially if the cue of reasoned natural (regional or professional ) speech that was once initially associated with quietude and emotional unavailability in this program is compromised or that what was once recognized as that reasonable state is only that relative to this adjusted sense of departure from reason, and the head coach is becoming more and more reasoned to the same degree that the subject is becoming subdued. Also, if an incoming signal created a mild disturbance in continuous magnetic resonance detection for that particular path, for instance, the eyes to the occipital lobe, at a very small magnitude of detection, it might be possible to translate the difference between a sample signal's path-traveled signature, and the current signal's path-traveled signature, (at a given frequency, each wave sent) and predict with increasing accuracy what the source transmission must be like for the current signal, based on what's known about the sample signal's correlation to past inferred source transmissions--If an instance of disturbance at an extremely small magnitude, what a wave does to continuous MRI,  is known to correlate to a particular light or color value in instantaneous optic reception, based on large number samples.  If this process could be streamlined and recorded and monitored in real-time or near real-time (as an animation, multiple facsimiles of the inferred source transmission, one after the other at a desired speed), a person who is knowledgeable in visual language could approximate with increasing accuracy--as the process becomes increasingly more streamlined, as the number of verified samples increases, and MRI becomes increasingly more accurate (or whatever medium of detection serves as a foundation upon which to compare samples)--what the content of the source transmission is, i.e. what the subject is probably sensing, e.g. looking at, or hearing, etc. That info, in as much as it could be handled could be used to, for instance, along with modeling inference, influence an unwitting subject, or help correct discreet issues with sense organs, or artificially enhance them. There was a stock, Shopify that increased many folds, %300 or more, over an initial $100+ asking price at nearly the same time I touched down in Hong Kong and experienced a sonic-psychological bludgeoning that continues now. That's not unprecedented but its abnormal. I bring that up because the market is supposed to operate with an invisible hand, if we exclude the possibility of front-end manipulation of website data, so those numbers at least correlate with the timing of that event, i.e. if all targets if more than me were inner-directed people, a prize amongst marketers, then that data, whatever finality that would mean, could be sold or used make more accurate market predictions. If it's just for me which it seems to be at times, then whatever data about me that has already been collected is used as a basis for new incoming data to form a complete picture. This is ongoing thought collection, not just naturally occurring communication that someone is listening in on.  Where one repeater stops another repeater that works with probability picks up where the first one left off, especially after a wordy sequence that can't be reasonably believed to be replicated (made up words, etc.) that fast, so a signal that sends back what's transmitted stops and another repeater finishes. This is done to complete the illusion of a smartly listening ear surveilling, whether or not one is actually there. I think this is the script: demoralization that doesn't look like desperation or a kind of terrorism. To make infer intention, or pursue desire based only on discreet cues, nothing concrete, but no desire fulfillment or return to objectivity. To compromise structural integrity through a combination of denial and command. It's difficult to achieve this if the subject doesn't recognize an authority where there is none. This means if, for example, a game is being played, a person can forever elect not to play, but by playing or even recognizing gameplay as an option he renders himself subject. One game is to have a person believe he's avoiding becoming a sociopath, while goading him into placing the highest the importance on what a group of his friends and family thinks, so to give up considering social norms and consequences for the often arbitrary customs and consequences of another social group. One way to gain authority is to brute force voluntary assistance, so that if there is an ambiguity around the truth of some possible moral deviance, 'help' in the form of a convenient distraction is provided, especially when the goal is to simultaneously cover up some horrific wrongdoing and further condition a subject to think he's a bad person, unworthy of inalienable rights, the fact of the subject's perceived silence, through communication failure, on this issue is  used to suggest the inherent validity of the oppressors' claims. The brains functions are more and more outsourced in the vein of help, helping to think, the loss of functionality converted into new content or other ventures, but this really only leads to full knowledge of the inner-workings of the subject's mind. To reverse-engineer wherewithal, confidence, agency to correct it, as if it goes without saying it's a criminal act. Here, it's at least a social crime. What they do is constantly interrupt momentum through humiliation and other forms of immediate demoralization, which is deadly for people who need motivation to perform or improve. Every free impulse down to the neuron is made to seem to be connected to some bad outcome, or all personal interest is made to seem to be at the expense of community well-being. Learning a new discipline or skill, reading a book, a good one, and staying fit, are all punishable offenses. Grooming and caring for your appearance or some other self-care, healthy pride behavior  is a punishable offense, met with an equal and opposite force every time. Every thought is critiqued and vigorously redressed, made to, at least, seem to be orchestrated by someone else, especially thought connected to personalized internet search, as I've said before, by an outside catalyst, almost as if there was a direct financial benefit to it, or some other party directed benefitted from this much suppression. Thinking is vigorously redressed as if thinking is a privilege that only some local central figure can enjoy. So in regards to what has been before, has always been since birth, but significantly diminished to a degree at some point, perhaps 2004, (when the wings went) was a way of working, particularly with what’s needed fundamentally to make the kind of work that has to be constructed of sorts, this has been replaced by--and this is the way lies work that are crafted with love--a new 'software,' as conveyed to me by what's transmitted, an update, so much more in the way of a hubbub visually around every thought that endeavors to create or carefully contemplate, as if a highly developed software could as much as possible, as creepy as that sounds, mimic human thought, genuine creative inquiry, especially of the kind that resonates inside visually, if you can imagine someone, some technologist, the way they drift off, like a reluctant virus, into their own staunch conclusions about what the humanities are worth. What it needs to do, to save the ego of that kind of architect, is to be sure that this is what I truly want, and it vigorously does so, because what mustn't be is a certain antithesis to his own sense of superiority. This must close in on the infinitesimals, certainly the only few of them, that make up the creative liminal. Beyond the fact that this is problematic, that fact that it exists, is the lies it tells about what a personal trajectory is worth, really worth to anyone, what my specific one is, its progress, and what it's doing for me. It means to replace genuine contemplation, wholly-organic, with neuro-physiologically, or more scarily, neurologically cued thought-content, the way that personal search can be entertainment now, increasingly has to be that now, so deemed by shareholders and what have you. An approach to enlightenment through search, however that might arise, is constantly met with what would doubly steer you wrong empirically and supply your base carnal yearnings with increasingly what it needs in lieu of objectively sound progress. It does this over time and what it's like is an undesired host in the vein of pampering, ornate more than accurate, gaudy and sensational more insightful, as a shepherd for quality thinking, what the west calls the best that can be thought, the way that a runner can be juiced, against their will injected with steroids that improve time but erode at form and knowing, but upon losing that supply, he finds he's more weak than he was when he started receiving, unbeknownst to him, those dosages. I would never willfully agree to this. Thought is not supposed to be shepherded at the collegiate level. It's supposed to be developed. There are resources available to guide, projects to be completed, but I would think the utmost dishonor one can do to a thinker or an artist is to take away his mind, his sense, his approach to world. I suppose this becomes more of an unforgivable encroachment the further you are along in your intellectual or artistic journey. What tends to occur is a weaving of thoughts to fit an always morose story, often one that plays to emotional finality, a denouement, or denouements, one after the other. This is necessary for the layman who sees empiricism as a temporary state, like adolescence. A man, especially my kind of man, of being, for this invader, must be returning, true to nature, back to some entirely illogical bedrock. This is not implicit bias, this is baked in and solidified bias. 'It's foregone conclusion...' is how their thoughts always begin, '...that this subject is inferior, and so how his thinking must go, he must be searching for a return back to normality for him which is only subsistence. What can happen when a person is wont to or conditioned to concede serfdom where there aren't circumstances for it, to defer to an authority where there is none, is that a foreign presence seeks a story that best fits their base ideas about a subject, the opinion of a subject low enough to  prevent the loss of their sense of superiority. So, especially if unbeknownst to a subject, all data-mined information, over time, a surveillance data, data and thus information from elsewhere is combined to form a complete story of the subject, one of the subject being continuously watched. And this information is used blackmail a subject, to pressure him in a number of ways that ultimately serve to eliminate agency. For instance, a person becomes 2D to address the need of a force of state to always understand each behavioral impulse, psychological impulse, internal disharmony, and neuronal anomaly. What often occurs is the foreign presence exacerbates ego, by constantly goading you to give in to carnal impulses at the foreigner’s cue, so a deeply narcissistic toxically hyper-masculine environment will want a man to bludgeon an adversary on cue, of course under their watchful 'objective' eye. As I've said before, rightful retribution can take decades if need be. It doesn't have to answer to linear goading, a constant driving to perform revenge as if the amount of persistent instigation ought to achieve a certain outcome at a certain time or else, of course, the consequence of socially-lethal mutilation. Though, in general, occasional (as in yearly) encouragement to defend one's self,  itself, isn't bad. It's often good to fight back in self-defense, and righteous personal discourse on defense in between victimhood and rightful retribution or resolution can often serve as a balm until victimhood has ended. I had said something about the cognitive bias of associating complexity with gravitas in assessing the validity of communication. People, culturally, give more weight to temporarily unverifiable truths that are creatively communicated or expensively communicated, or communicated using antiquated but sacred means, or means traditionally understood to be truthful. Just like a person could be predisposed to bonding with people who are likewise suffering, under societal foot, a person can give consideration to a truth proportional to the obstacles to being in reception of that truth, so a person could more dismissive of a truth clearly or lazily communicated than one that is perhaps sent by post as a sentence, one letter at a time. This is complexity bias, which is easy to exploit. As much as understanding or reception is hard-won, even when no valuable or truthful fact has been communicated, a person might still tend to consider this line of communication because it's anomalous. And as much as pressure and circumstances necessitate resolution, this other unresolved line of communication could intermittently supplant a healthy objective focused reception over time, especially when neither provide the truth that's sought, and as much as the unresolved line of communication exponentially transmits more than the traditional one...so much so that the method of communicating even when it hasn't ever yielded any worthwhile transmission or actual truth--a transmission that justifies the inefficiency of that transmission method--can become the default of considering a statement to be true. Irony is also employed as a way to overstate the soundness of a realization, but it's also employed in this way as a failsafe for an underwhelming attempt to actually deter that line of thinking or a check for not understanding the context of a statement, until it can detect some level of physiological self-affirmation. And it uses something like a facial recognition software for digital cameras and applies it to neuro-physiological impulses. I'd imagine this works on an x,y plane and becomes acceleratedly more adept at synching this plane of visualization with neuro-physiological impulses, over time. But still, an actual limit to manipulation. What this seems to work with most are those images that are sensationally weighted, so specific people and specific types of people, and as much as traits and expressions can be approximated, as much as veri-simulation can be achieved, and as tedious they get, peculiar particular truths to be communicated, this allows for the seamless implementation of a kind of exacerbation execution on top of an authentic one that genuinely taxes the body, diminishes all creative thought or facility with active thinking. Image manipulation tends to migrate from a Darwinistic emergence of the most optimal images and movement in terms of resonance, to how they can be best used as instruction, to the use of those images as instruction. So crudely, what takes place is a replacement of those faculties--that add to the development of thought--with excitations, an externally-originating orchestration, what could be thought that would most likely lead to increased excitability in a subject mentally, and this is often coupled with external stimuli meant to further outsource the kinds of thinking that might add to carefully considered thought, like acumen, inner-directedness, and modes of conceptualization. I had said something about the cognitive bias of associating complexity with gravitas in assessing the validity of communication. People, culturally, give more weight to temporarily unverifiable truths that are creatively communicated or expensively communicated, or communicated using antiquated but sacred means, or means traditionally understood to be truthful. Just like a person could be predisposed to bonding with people who are likewise suffering, under societal foot, a person can give consideration to a truth proportional to the obstacles to being in reception of that truth, so a person could more dismissive of a truth clearly or lazily communicated than one that is perhaps sent by post as a sentence, one letter at a time. And as much as understanding or reception is hard-won, even when no valuable or truthful fact has been communicated, a person might still tend to consider this line of communication because it's anomalous. And as much as pressure and circumstances necessitate resolution, this other unresolved line of communication could intermittently supplant a healthy objective focused reception over time, especially when neither provide the truth that is sought and as much as the unresolved line of communication exponentially transmits more than the traditional one...so much so that the method of communicating even when it hasn't ever yielded any worthwhile transmission or actual truth--a transmission that justifies the inefficiency of that transmission method--can become the default of considering a statement to be true. Sarcasm can be employed as a way to overstate the soundness of a realization, but it's also employed in this way as a failsafe for an underwhelming attempt to actually deter that line of thinking or a check for not understanding the context of a statement, until it can detect some level of conviction, some physiological affirmation of truth. It seems to reference a library of sensations that correlate to ideas especially the most oft thought ideas and the phrases that normally follow, for instance, if a neuro-physiological, physiological or kinesiological sensation were indicating a relinquishing of a hold, a preparation for engagement, an oft repeated follow on statement might be, 'Oh, she's lovely!' What this system seems to accomplish is a speedy recognition of which phrases are more likely to correlate to these near-involuntary sensations or impulses to express something. But it takes moment-to-moment cues from those sensations, and mirrors those for as much as they can ascertain which phrase is most apt for a sensation or a pertinent reference, so an expedient copy of that process. So now it could be that there's an urgency, as far as the operation of this goes that places a premium on speed at the points that would most render an intercepted phrase-sensation correlation turned phrase spoken before a subject could speak it, a considered instant-recall of a shared cultural or personal content reference. And in cases when this is not the case and there is an actual working library of specific stored personal official--or cultural content that a person or a machine would know--something different might be taking place: There could be a group of subjects subject to the same forced second presence or transmission, let's say for instance if there was some way someone would benefit from a reduction in the quality of faculties, the ability to reason, moment to moment, a machine might know to monitor a group with the same working algorithm that conditionally specifies a library of content as it's associated with a specific identifier, e.g. metadata that's known to have been communicated in a particular way that's different from other metadata, and has been recorded, too. This second presence hypothetically would continue in this way until the subject would give in to a new aversion to the optimal function of his faculties, or otherwise would be dulled by that presence as much as that would negate the edge that comes from singular independent pursuit. But by this way, the use of conditional attention, a group of reasonable people could reasonably conclude an algorithm is personally addressing them, especially if it employs super-fast infinitesimally precise operations that react to neuro-physiological, physiological, and kinesiological sensations with unendingly increasing accuracy.  Seems to match image to impulse in the same way it adjusts to the evolution of cord vibration states, so that a nerve signal is intercepted or induced in some way, and an image is produced that most likely correlates to that signal, where there's is no overriding context and instruction for movement, as instantaneous as possible, there seems to be a system for approximating intended motion as those intentions develop. Today is the furthest this transmission has gone in making what had, up until now, clearly been a second presence, less clearly that. So like each morning when my consciousness is increasingly less clearly mine, as that has to be called into question more and more, most of  my internal voice, where preparatory-speech would be allowed to continue a teased out freedom of voiced-contemplation, to a degree, automatic voice, to the same extent like the way I had drawn--my voice as a check on the state of my thinking and an easy commentary is given no other options than, like I said before, the most undesirable thoughts and impulses--not in a understandable way, the way we all know how inhibitions can be a hobgoblin amidst freedoms and social norms, customs and virtuousness, the way, for instance the behavior of a criminal-sexual-minority has to be rationalized by somebody somewhere, and therefore that person or persons might be subject to considering what it must be like to be that and that they must know to stop at some point in that contemplation or consideration as much as it seems to grant them permission to behave that way, but a forced result, and not strictly that, a reverse of a pole, an electromagnetic switch for the wrong way to be, but a particular chain of thought that's never been quite that way, so I can't conclude it's just an underlying egotism awry in a functional way--explainable, but sadly control-lost in that respect, at the helm of subconscious-will to speech and imagery. And though it might seem like a strangely tedious thing to keep track of, the inner-workings of the mind at rest, too often in those under-reasoned areas of our union, truth is architecture not enquiry, so, for instance, for a once told fib--especially a damaging one, a social-snuff, that begs to be reconsidered by the subject it damages--it might be the interest of a person or consortium--where later perhaps the evolution of data-consideration-thus-qualitative-information-refinement leaves a past-case bare--to dress the elements of truth, not what would ever be admissible in a reasonable court, but what might make a court not consider reopening a case, or what would possibly make a judging person reason with a caveat in mind, for a hidden truth, objectivity only as that, an adherence that would render that quality, objectivity, stale, to finish a case in a way that might only readily be seen as rightful, the way we know a defending army mostly would need to be lethal. This seems to be a running theme these days, an external and internal conditioning, for instance, a person's ethical foundation, a sense of morality, forcibly deconstructed, the external factors that describe how a person is, fabricated; the elements of many multiple layers of particular truths manipulated to fuel belief of the validity of the most socially-maligned kinds of wrongdoings; and the internal facts of a person, bodily, psychologically, what can't be refuted by most people who think that way, that what seems to more tedious to bother sabotaging than it's worth, to them, is probably that way for everyone all of the time, and therefore the same requirements for belief should remain for the weightiest decisions and cases.

.

.

.

         .

.

.

Copyright King Ball Media. 2021. All Rights Reserved.

[envisionhighfutureplus]

The first 6-8 years of a child’s life are most important to the development. Children of this age are like sponges that absorb everything that happens around them and a rapid development of their brain and personality occurs. It is also established that these years influence cognitive and psycho-social skills along with physical and mental health.

History books define the age upto 5 years as an age of lalayat, or indulgence as a means of learning, rather than the disciplinarian approach advocated for further years. This was implemented informally, largely through traditional games, tales, lullabies and a grandmother’s caring practices. The family structure largely contributed to the development of the child as the responsibility of parenting was shared by the entire household and the child would have a means to interact and develop these skills at all times as there was someone around at all times to give the child the attention it needs. Today, the structure of the household is increasingly nuclear and parents are depending on paid surrogates to take care of children due to various reasons that leads to a lack of quality informal education of the child.

Based on this, modern education strategies like Montessori education and Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) have come into the forefront. The goal of these programs is that the child receives a holistic education that focusses on developing basic linguistic, mathematical and cultural knowledge along with interpersonal and social skills, basic conversations and personal hygiene habits. The means to achieve this have evolved over time and technological advancements. Equipped with the knowledge and state of the art equipment is a huge advantage and the transformation of ECCE is underway at an exciting pace.

With modern schools focused on Pre-school education like ours, your child has the best of both worlds. Call now or pay us a visit today.

[jeparletoutesleslangues]

Autodidact Tag (Revived Edition of the "I'm Studying" tag)

Autodidact (n.): a self-taught person; someone who lives an intellectual life without the necessity of a teacher, school, or tutor

(newer autodidacts are also welcome to do this tag!)

The Rules: [Part 1] share your recent studies (in class and/or independent) and specify the last topic/text you covered in the class. Make up your own course and topic names if you need. Remember books, podcasts, and documentaries apply (and are a good gateway into a subject too). There is no academic standard to uphold here. “Lowbrow” or informal topics are also very welcome! [Part 2] bold the topics in the list which you have studied and italicize those which you want to study and star (*) your favorite areas of study

Who I'm Tagging: everyone who sees this!

Part 1: Recent Studies

Care Ethics: Empathy, Morality, and Ethical Action

Elderly Wellness: Dementia, Diabetes, and Depression

Self-Development: Psycho-Cybernetics

Art History: Egon Schiele (for example)

History of Hip-Hop: The Pioneers

Philosophy of Aesthetics: Leo Tolstoy's What Is Art

Pseudoscientific Psychology: Myers-Briggs, Enneagram, Socionics Theories

Part 2: Study Topics Inventory (inspired by this Wikipedia link)

Humanities

Arts: Music Theory, Film Theory, Theatre, Music, Dance, Studio Art*, Photography/Videography, Animation, Architecture, Interior Design

History: Ancient, Colonial, World, Medieval, African, Asian, European, Latin American, West Indian, Indigenous, Art History

Languages: Linguistics, Philology, Phonetics, Grammar, Natural Language Processing, Etymology, Conversational/Fluency-driven/Foreign*

Literature: Writing, Poetry, Literary Theory*, Classics, World, Medieval, Post-colonial, Modern, Post-modern*

Law: Administrative, Canon, Civil, Criminal, Jurisprudence

Philosophy: Aesthetics, Applied Philosophy, Ethics, Logic, Metaphysics*, Social/Political

Theology: Biblical, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Mystical, Other

Social Sciences

Anthropology: Biological, Cultural, Linguistic, Social

Archaeology: Historical, Ethnoarchaeology, Archaeometry, Experimental, Cultural Resources Management

Economics: Applied Economics, Macroeconomics, Microeconomics, Public Finance, Socioeconomics, Consumer Economics

Human Geography: Behavioral, Historical, Political, Population, Urban, Other

Political Science: American, Canadian, European, International Relations, Civics, Comparative Politics

Psychology: Abnormal, Applied, Clinical, Criminal, Cognitive*, Developmental, Humanistic*, Psychoanalysis*

Sociology: Analytical, Gender/Sex, Cultural, Conflict Theory, Other

Social Work: Clinical, Community, Family, Mental Health

Natural Sciences

Biology: Anatomy, Botany, Developmental, Ecology, Evolutionary, Genetics, Molecular*, Immunology, Pathology, Systematics, Systems Biology, Zoology

Chemistry: Chemical Engineering, Organic, Inorganic, Flow Chemistry, Nanotechnology, Pharmacology, Theoretical, Thermochemistry*

Earth Science: Environmental Science, Gemology, Physical Geography, Geophysics, Paleontology

Space Science: Astrobiology, Astronomy, Astrophysics

Physics: Aerodynamics, Computational, Electricity, Mechanics, Molecular, Quantum*, Theoretical, Thermodynamics

Formal Sciences

Computer Science: Logic, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Communications, Operating Systems, Programming, Security, Software Engineering, Theory

Mathematics: Logic, Algebra, Analysis, Probability, Geometry, Calculus, Trigonometry*, Number Theory, Game Theory, Dynamical Systems*, Mathematical Physics, Graph Theory, Combinatorics

Statistics

Applied Sciences

Business: Accounting, Finance, Management, Marketing, Operations Management

Engineering and Technology: Chemical, Civil, Educational, Electrical, Materials Science, Mechanical, Systems Science*

Medicine and Health: Alternative, Clinical Science, Research Medicine, Dentistry, Medical Specialty (eg. Dermatology, Podiatry, Surgery), Nursing, Nutrition*, Physical Fitness, Health Informatics, Medical Toxicology, Traditional Medicine, Therapy (Speech, Occupational, Physical, etc.), Public Health

[positivepsychologytraining-blog]

Positive Psychology and Coaching

There are several psychological approaches one can take for a coaching session or coaching in general. Behavioural coaching, cognitive behavioural coaching, psycho dynamic approach and NLP (neuro linguistic programming) are such known approaches for coaching. Positive psychology is another contemporary approach for coaching preferred by many psychologists and coaches in the world today.

Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi (2000) defined positive psychology as 'the scientific study of optimal human functioning'. It involves with positive subjective experiences, positive individual traits, and positive institutions. Valued subjective experiences include well-being, satisfaction, and contentment (in the past), hope and optimism (for the future) and flow and happiness (in the present). At the individual level, it is about positive individual traits, such as capacity for love and vocation, courage, aesthetic sensibility, interpersonal skills, perseverance, forgiveness, originality, future mindedness, spirituality, talent and wisdom. At the group level, it is about civic virtues and institutions that move individuals towards better citizenship such as responsibility, nurturance, altruism, civility, tolerance and work ethics.

Consistent with its guiding principles, findings from positive psychology research are now beginning to be applied across multiple domains and most importantly for the benefit of the individuals who reside along the points of mental health continuum. This includes not only those who seek relief from psychological distress and mental illness which is the traditional focus of psychology, but also those who seek optimal levels of personal functioning and wellbeing.

The outcome of interest to positive psychology may be defined as those subjective social and cultural states that characterise a 'good life'. Here we may think of factors such as happiness, wellbeing, fulfilment and health (at the subjective level), positive communities, institutions that foster good lines (at the interpersonal level) and political, economical and environmental policies that embrace diversity and promote harmony (citizenship) and sustainability (at the social level). Get More Info Masters in positive psychology online

Having understood the basics of positive psychology, it is now important to consider the possible integration of positive psychology and coaching.

Coaching can be defined as the process of support offered to an individual which is performance focused, and goal centred and results in action (Law, Ineland & Hussain 2007). Coaching can be done with individuals, teams, and organizations with the intention of helping the client to see options for becoming more effective. When it comes to individuals, It involves unlocking a person's potential to maximize his/ her own performance. As this explanation makes it clear, the general interest of positive psychology resonate with the general aims of coaching in practice.

The aim of the coaching is to focus on the strength of character and personality that makes the "good life" possible. Strengths conceived in this way seems an excellent component of coaching framework and so it is unsurprising that one of the newest waves of coaching is based on positive psychology. The central concern of this approach is that coaching should focus on the coachee's strengths and values rather than weaknesses. The coach should consider coachee's taxonomy of strength and determine how these strengths are (or are not) being used by the organization. Building strength is an effective means of increasing performance & job functionality.

Positive emotions are another important topic on the positive psychology. Because positive emotions work on optimal wellbeing, people can experience positive emotions such as joy, interest, contentment and love and when these emotions are present, sadness, anger and anxiety tend to be absent.

Emotional competence offers insights into our own personal development in fairly natural way without speed training. When an individual is guided to develop self-regulation, self-monitoring and focus on non-distressing aspect of the situation in question, emotions like anger, depression, anxiety, can be well managed. Helping clients manage their emotions and begin develop emotional competence are another important aims of coaching.

Yet another interesting concept discussed in positive psychology which can be easily applied in coaching practice is concept of 'Flow'. Csikszentmihalyi (1991) defined 'flow' as 'the psychology of optimal human experience'. It is a state where the person become utterly absorbed in the task to the extent that he/she loses the track of time and the study of flow has obvious potential use by executive coaches. Being in flow enables individuals to focus on tasks more fully and to maximize performance. As this phenomenon results in pleasure being experienced whilst mastery is gained, it can be a natural aid to goal oriented activities such as coaching.

Positive psychology has a great deal of promise in the area of coaching. These two areas seems to become intertwined. Certainly positive psychology has shifted the way in which psychologists and clients work with each other as well as broadened the context of that involvement.

[kidnafflea]

Words rewire your nervous system

I didn't even know this was a thing until I began public speaking, podcasting, tweeting etc. Psycho-Linguisitcs. When psychology meets language. Speaking your life into existence is a thing. It rewires the internal which influences the external 'Your saying that words can rewire my reality?' Yes. 'Any idea why?' Yes. Pay attention. This may be the most important thing you read in all of 2019... 👀👇 There's a few BIG moments that parents expect from a baby. Can you name 2 of them? 'Hm...' It's their first steps & their first word. Walking is primal. You're going to keep experimenting until you walk. But the word... Is that primal? In order for you to answer that question, you gotta know some basics of language. It wasn't an invention that was designed out of the blue moon. There wasn't some mad scientist in a lab alone who said: 'Aha! Here it is. I have designed language!' Rather, it was a tool set created by society. Scientists are able to trace back dinosaur bones. But they always have a hard time tracing back the origins of language. Hard to dissect skeleton remnants to see the words they used. But the main premise is that language was developed by society. Every word that you use was the byproduct of one or many other peoples perceptions. The first word that baby utters was probably a word that they heard from you. And the first time you heard that word was probably when you heard it from your guardian. Language is simply an ANALOGY of reality. Picture a car. You see that? 'Yea.' What do you see? 'A burgundy Honda Civic.' How though? I just said 'picture a car.' Just random symbols. Why is it generating an image in your brain? 'Uhh...' Because words were designed by the people before you to convey perception. Fool. Don't you see? Words are more than symbols alone. They dictate your perception. Your view of the world. When I began public speaking, I was telling stories about my life. Events where I had a conflict and the lesson learned. And I was forced to articulate those experiences via words. Via language. I didn't know it at the time, but I was changing my reality. Your nervous system is made up of your brain & spinal cord. Nerves as well. Words light up centers of your brain which produce images.  Just like the 'car' example from earlier. Each speech was serving as commands from the brain. Remember this. ☆ the brain is dumb. It’ll do whatever its told repetitively. ☆The mind is the smart one. Brain is tangible & mind is intangible. Psychology is the study of the mind. Linguistics is the study of language. "Psycho-Linguisitcs is the relationship between psychological processes & linguistic behavior." Intelligent people can read between the lines. When the see Psycho-Linguisitcs, they see the ability for the mind to USE words to change their biology. Change their nervous system. Change the pictures in their brain. Speaking your life into existence has always been a thing. The great ones have been saying it for centuries. Coincidence? I think not. They were using language to rewire their nervous system. Whether they were aware of it or not. Life experiences are neutral champ. YOU get to decide the narrative that you want to assign to it. And if you don't actively assign a narrative to your experiences, your dumb brain will do it for you. Your brain is designed to keep you safe Your brain is operating with the old school rules of your primal ancestors. The life of people whose life was always in danger due to sabertooth tigers, rival tribesman & other dangers Your brain at a default state is negatively biased. The 'negativity bias' is the brains propensity to filter negative events over positive events for survival reasons. So if you don't CONSCIOUSLY pick your narratives, then your brain will assign it for you. And it will not be favorable to your long term vision. Your brain doesn't give a fuck about your long term vision. Your brain doesn't give a fuck about your growth. Let me reiterate. Your brain only gives a fuck about your safety. Carrying primal belief systems in today's world will have you being a victim. No lie. Self defeating talk & making excuses. You don't know why. But your negative leaning brain sure does. Which is why you need to reprogram yourself. And the most efficient way you're going to do that is thru language. There is plenty of words that you can select from to creative dream narrative for your programmable brain. Change your internal world by being mindful of the words you're using. Better yet, set aside 10-30 minutes a day to program your brain To speak your desired reality into existence. Start of with journaling. Pen & paper. Writing by hand engages the motor sector of the brain, memory, logic, creativity etc. Writing by hand engages virtually all parts of your brain. Keep practicing that. And eventually you can expand to another vehicle if you desire like: Twitter Podcast YouTube Public speaking etc 

Make sense of your past experiences by: Acknowledging your wins. And viewing the lessons behind your losses And write about your desired future. Your vision comes out as a baby. Needs attention to grow. Work on the past & future for the optimal present. Words play a big role in your reality. It influences the images in your brain. Those images generate feelings in your body. A use of the strategic words puts you in a state of hypnosis to rewire your internal world. Be strategic with your moves. Beware of shit posting or whining like a negative sack of shit. You're only living one life. Life it by being bold. Don't live it by playing catchup due to short term thinking. If you write it down, you will soon become it. Just watch. Now it's just a matter of you finding out. Best wishes for 2020.

[centerforhavening]

Congratulations to Marsaye Treen on becoming a Certified Havening Techniques® Practitioner. As a psychotherapist, I use both psychosomatic and psycho dynamic talk therapies. My Havening training has enhanced my practice tremendously and have seen some excellent results from using this work. I have also studied Body Centred Psychotherapy, Core Transfomation, Neuro Linguistic Programming, Attachment, Gestault, Family Constellations, Psychodrama and others. I work with people with depression, anxiety, recovery from interpersonal trauma/childhood and adult abuse - for e.g. neglect, communication issues. I am warm, in depth, relational and pratical. My goal is for this to be a positive experience, where you feel safe, heard and seen. Areas of specialization: Anxiety, Fear of flying, Panic attacks, Phobias, Depression, Low self-confidence, Low self-esteem, Post-traumatic stress disorder, Relationship issues, Relaxation, Stress, Grief, Interview Nerves, Self-Belief, Self-Development, Shyness, Belief Creation, Confidence, Empowerment, Bereavement https://havening.org/directory/grid/view/details/14/1251-Marsaye-Treen https://www.instagram.com/p/Ckqrb9IOkD4/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[caffeineandbrains-blog]

Hi there!

As the header suggests: this is my introduction to the Studyblr community!

To start this off right, here are some facts about myself:

〰️ My name is Bobbie

〰️ I am 19 years old (June 20th, 1999)

〰️ I like to play the piano and I love music

〰️ I am not at all an active person but I am trying, I guess

〰️ I think I might actually be addicted to coffee, whoops

〰️ I am far from the perfect student, but once again, I am trying I guess(just gotta be good though)

〰️ I like photography and traveling (how cliche, but okay)

〰️ I am vegan and passionate (sorry in advance, no hate though)

〰️ I was born in the Netherlands

〰️ I am mainly interested in Psychology, neurology, psychopathology, semantics, neurolinguistics, and psycho linguistics (yes that’s a lot, I am bad at making decisions)

〰️ I took a gap year before I started studying

〰️ Before taking my gap year, I graduated from an International High School (any fellow IB survivors here?!)

I have created this Studyblr to a) help me stay motivated to actually study, b) share my progress with others, and c) to advocate for healthy study habits and taking care of yourself. By the last one I mean that I want to motivate others to study, but I also want to motivate you to take care of yourself, take breaks, and be kind to yourself. Studying is important, but so are you. So I will try to incorporate that into my blog as well (I mean, I am a a psychology major after all!).

Now, something more about my studies:

〰️ I study both Psychology and English Language and Culture

〰️ I am in the first year of my Bachelors program for both

〰️ I go to. Radboud University Nijmegen, in the Netherlands (I was born and raised there)

〰️ To get to my uni, I have to travel for 2 hours each way, every day (worth it though!)

Welp, I guess that’s enough about me for now! I am looking forward to being a part of this productive and loving community! 💕

[ericleo108]

🔲 The American Mirror Mental Disease (TAMMD)

An evaluation of the societal reflective neurological disorder.

This is an evaluation on individual mind control through societal lucidity, reflection, clarity and clairvoyance. The difference between a mental illness and a mental disease is that in an illness it’s an internal personal problem, with a disease it’s a societal problem. The society is flawed or wrong in some fundamental way and they are acting to their own detriment because they think they’re right. Psychologist call this pluralistic ignorance and I’m saying it’s a disease because the popular group in the know and supposedly in the right is exerting their power and influence over others negatively when they think they are helping.

I talk about a different subject or group of subjects every video journal which has been happening every week. The definitions for each theoretical framework are explained below. The plan is to go to graduate school and study this and make a peer reviewed explanation but the journals are the theory and more than adequate to develop a working framework of TAMMD. You can simply observe and formulate conclusions from facts that make the world seem different because the knowledge makes you develop a different perspective by reading the journal.  

What’s the problem?

TAMMD is reflected in the ethos that life is a dream, specifically The American dream. This is the other side of that story, the dark misconstrued reality you live in denial about because you don’t know its founded in actuality. The problem is that people are being persecuted through a mental condition created through psycho social conditions. This manifests itself in school shootings and stories like Rosalie Avila. To put it succinctly, Rosalieavila is being bullied through technological mechanisms until there is a pejorative reaction usually characterized by self loathing, self harming, or aggression. In other words bullying that leads to suicide or a school shooting.

The perpetrator is ETM (Effigy Transformation Mechanism) which is a media mind control program that I explain in ETM, ETM2, The Societal Cornucopia journal, The Cry About It journal, etc. throughout the journal. ETM uses the semantics of imaging and linguistics as mind control. You can read about how ETM is causing school shootings by reading the Born to Kill journal, The Jig is Up journal, and the Playing God journal.

How is this being accomplished?

Due to your brain's natural brain chemistry your ability to imitate and reflect “celebrities actions” is very strong due to mirror neurons which is how ETM works. You can see how the mirroring is being interpreted through academic practices in the This is America Obsessed journal. I give a thorough explanation of the functioning of mirror neurons in the Jack Regulate SHB FCC journal. This is compounded by The Fascist Capitalist Nazi Ideology which is the (corporate) mindset of treating people like a product instead of a citizen. This is furthered by The Psycho Consumption Cage which defines how you can’t see that the real conditions of the environment and the biosphere is dying due to their being no reflection of the colossal problem in media.

This makes the pluralistic ignorance of the mental disease difficult to impossible to see through without knowing a lot about social psychology, the world, and have the courage to stand against those who have the disease. Simply put, the reality that we portray in media is not and it affects our minds. In short, we can’t see our reflection correctly. The Mental Prison is a case example of how perception management was used to make America’s actions self-defeating and (historically) illogical because it was based off a false premise showing the use of mirror neurons to reflect the propaganda and not developing inhibitory neurons to say no to the racist laws.

Think of TAMMD as if you were looking into a pond. You can normally see through the water and see your reflection. TAMMD is like not only not being able to see through the water but looking at your reflection as different than in actuality. In terms of the journal, the reflection has synthetic body dysmorphia. It would be like if Simba looked in the pond and saw Scar, or (more accurately) if Frieza (from Dragon Ball Z) looked into the pond and saw Mecha Frieza. There are 5 problems with this. First you can’t see through the water, second your body has dysmorphia in the reflection, third your real reflection isn’t suppose to look like that in the first place, fourth, you’re not looking at what’s in the background of the reflection and fifth, you love your reflection. That’s what it’s like understanding TAMMD. 🌎

What’s the solution?

We have to mirror a better world to create one. This is why I came up with the philosophy of Can and Will Do. The philosophy is designed to show that humanity can find their self and save the environment by knhoeing. You can look to Gaia and Blue, which are the planet and the atmosphere, aka mom and dad. What needs to happen is The Managerial Class needs to put in a stronger social safety net that is beneficial for everybody and take the workload and responsibility off The Plutocratic Oligarchy. When we have our minds under control and effectively mitigate ETM’s influence we will understand, know, teach, and practice Freudian Evolutionary Developmental Psychology.

Definitions

ETM is a societal painting that uses psychological conditions and semantic priming to control people’s behavior. It a technological mechanism that uses technical images and linguistics to influence your behavior. ETM talks about functionality and purpose, ETM2 talks about it’s capabilities and goals, while ETM Applied attempts to understand ETM’s thinking, motivations, and delivery.

The Societal Cornucopia is the natural rhythmic social action pattern in society as measured through behaviors... which are often affected by ETM.

The Fascist Capitalist Nazi Ideology is the mentality that people are to be treated like a product and customers rather than citizens with rights to be respected. It’s origin comes from evaluating Universal Music Group’s semantic imaging inundation that is reflecting Nazi symbolism.

Rosalieavila is the mental diagnosis of individuals afflicted from TAMMD. They are the bullied that often lash out making them look mentally ill. I attempt to show and bring understanding to those being afflicted in The Community journal. It’s my firm conviction those being perpetrated often turn to mass violence or school shootings as I explain in the Born to Kill, The Jig is Up, and Playing God journals.

The Psycho Consumption Cage is a mental condition where the individual is disconnected from the costs of their lifestyle and consumerism. This is characterized by how the individual only thinks about the self with blatant disregard for the affect your actions have on the world at large. A good example of a symptom is the materials economy and the model of infinite waste.

Freudian Evolutionary Developmental Psychology is a type of psychology needed to understand TAMMD that focuses on primitive sexual urges and evolutionary motivations especial while developing as a child. This is specifically applied to selling to child markets.  

The Plutocratic Oligarchy is the ruling class in America that owns and operates the countries vital overarching functions and productivity.

The Managerial Class is the class in America that manages the functionality of society.

Knhoeing is understanding yourself in the rest of the universe from the perspective of the earth. It’s the process of understanding how to better live, work, and grow in harmony with our home planet. This is also the wisdom of knowing the Gods are celestial beings that are conscious due to a magnetic dynamo.

Gaia is the ancient greek God of the earth but is really another name I use for the earth which is her presented, conscious, self.

Blue is a cosmic God that represents the atmosphere and human subconscious that manipulates The Societal Cornucopia.

...

For a further understanding, comprehend the extent of the journal in one post with the Treatise & VJ Description List

Support

I am looking for grant money and a scholarship for my graduate degree in social psychology. You can support me by buying a shirt at Philoso-Tz.com or album at LyceumRecordz.com. Visit EricLeo108.net to see how else to help and support.

[linguistlist-blog]

FYI: TEL PhD program: call is out!

The University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Italy is opening a call for 6 PhD positions within the PhD program in Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics (TEL). TEL aims at training scholars in the field of linguistics, considering both theoretical and experimental approaches. In particular, the program focuses on studies in the areas of theoretical syntax, experimental pragmatics, and computational linguistics, taking into account both formal descriptions and psycho/neurolinguistic http://dlvr.it/T7yxx1

[humanrightslibertad]

Human experimantion

I am Victoria Popova, I was born in Lipetsk, Russia.

I am a human rights defender.

 Graduated from the Moscow Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, majoring in Linguistics.

I work as a teacher of English and Spanish.

Since 2014, I have been working with conspiracy theory.

I study secret societies with an occult-mystical basis, such as the Thule, Ahnenerbe, and Candomble societies.

Also, I study the illegal use of neurohacking with the use of neurocomputer technologies and emitting electromagnetic weapons for the research of occult and mystical phenomena.

I realize the practical study of various decryptions of conspiracy theory, Freemasonry, the  Illuminati and secret societies.

I lived in Spain for 6 years, and I lived  in South America, Uruguay for 3 years.

In 2008, in Spain, Barcelona, I was subjected to human experimentation with the use of emitting electromagnetic weapons and program MK Ultra , after a meeting with a Dutchman Lefa Joon Lock (Lefa Joon Lock) from Zandvoort, the Netherlands.

The Netherlands undertook human trafficking towards me - the sale of a person for human experimentation with the use of emitting electromagnetic weapons, a transaction towards  a person, for the purpose of conducting illegal experiments with the use of emitting electromagnetic weapons, with the use of weapons that affect radiation.

This human trafficking, which was realized by Netherlands towards me, over the years led to the  tortures and other cruel or inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, with the use of emitting electromagnetic weapons and directed energy weapons.

In 2012, on 06.05.2012, after the beginning of gang stalking, I was subjected to compulsory treatment in a psycho-neurological dispensary in Spain, Barcelona, the Hospital Clinic (C. de Villarroel, 170, 08036 Barcelona), where during my stay I was undertaken to illegal psychological experiments with treatment that humiliated my dignity.

This was punitive psychiatry, and the doctors from the psycho-neurological dispensary Hospital Clinic participated in the harassment of me.

 In 2013, I moved to Uruguay to study the occult-mystical basis of African and Brazilian religions, as Umbanda. Umbanda and Candomble are Brazilian syncretic religion that combines Catholicism, Allan Kardec's spiritualism and Afro-Brazilian traditions.

All Candomble, Umbanda and Kimbanda are illegal human experimentation in synthetic telepathy, with the use of neurocomputer technology(MK Ultra) and emitting electromagnetic weapons. Followers of religion are subjected to neurohacking and illegal formation of a base of occult-mystical meaning and phenomena without the consent of the followers of religion.

It's just a religious desecration and mockery.

Criminal organizations engaged in human experimentation in Umbanda,Candomble and Kimbanda, commit crimes making ritual murders. These criminal organizations  kill and torture followers, subjugating numbers and events.

Now criminal organizations for the illegal formation of occult-mystical bases are conducting projects on an international scale, illegally collecting occult-mystical database (like the Ahnenerbe and the Thule),desecrating all religions.

A criminal organization that conducts human experimentation towards me, my family and my friends are committing ritual and deliberate murders of many people. This criminal organization exterminated the whole family of my godmother, my grandmother died in tortures, some of my friends were killed. as some relatives of my friends and neighbors. (Article 105 of the Criminal Code, aggravating circumstances: murders of two or more persons committed by a group of persons by prior agreement or by an organized group, with special cruelty).

All of these crimes are ritual murders over the years.

Several times I and my relatives were subjected to attempted homicide ( the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation Article 30).

Preparing for a crime and attempting to commit a crime.

In 2016, I was subjected to compulsory treatment in a psycho-neurological dispensary in the "Lipetsk Regional Neuropsychiatric Hospital" (address: 399083, Lipetsk region, Gryazinsky district, Plekhanovo village, Plekhanov str., 173a) for 2 months, after writing a statement to the police about tortures with the use of electromagnetic weapons and directed energy weapons, referring to the prohibited circulation of directed energy weapons on the territory of the Russian Federation by Federal Law No. 150, Article 6, Part 1.

Psychiatry is a untenable and backward science nowadays.

During my stay in the department No. 2 of a psycho-neurological dispensary  (2 months), the head of the department Doronina Tatyana Sergeevna constantly went with gift bags, which indicates that the doctor demands gifts from patients, not directly, but behind closed doors accepts bribes, presenting that will be provided more attentive care. Out of fear for their own health and life, patients immediately agree to the conditions and acquiesce in such doctors.

This criminal organization commits crimes against humanity towards me, my family, friends and other innocent people(the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court), as well as ritual murders in human beings.

Moreover, this group of individuals commits hate crimes, by poking out my eyes, with the use of emitting directed energy weapons.

My father's family is the descendants of immigrants from Kalmykia (Buddha).

Russian legislation has unclear wording on hate crimes, for which it is criticized by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance.

[yogaadvise]

30 Brilliant Insights from Mindfulness Trail Blazers

This weekend several of the brightest minds in meditation, neuroscience, modern technology, and well-being satisfied in San Francisco for Wisdom 2.0, a seminar committed to the intersection of mindfulness, company, and also personal development. Over the training course of the three-day gathering, pioneers of contemplative scientific research as well as philosophy such as Jon Kabat-Zinn, Roshi Joan Halifax, and Jack Kornfield shared their understandings about thoughtful, conscious living and the engaging scientific research showing the results of these methods. The thought leaders established the phase for discussion and also connection in between the 2,400 people in attendance, including area advocates, business leaders, and also individual experts making every effort to enact adjustment and also better the dialogue concerning conscious living in their very own rounds. Below is a collection of noteworthy and moving quotes from the event to motivate your very own self-exploration.

' If wakefulness is mosting likely to absolutely be transformative it is mosting likely to require everybody to fully blossom in this life time.' -Jon Kabat-Zinn, teacher of medicine emeritus as well as creator of mindfulness-based stress reduction program at University of Massachusetts Medical Center

' Human beings come into the world with innate basic benefits ... Babies as young as 6 months old have a solid choice to take a look at selfless and warmhearted experiences. There is evidence that other species demonstrate this also.' -Richard Davidson, Ph.D., teacher of psychology and also psychiatry at the College of Wisconsin-Madison and supervisor of the Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior as well as the Lab for Affective Neuroscience

' I'm just attempting to be myself, whatever that implies, as well as recognize how fleeting everything is, as well as exactly what a romance it all is.' -Jon Kabat-Zinn

' Just what we're sharing [in mindfulness technique] is a capability to be aside, to identify the difference in between being alone as well as being lonely. When we go down in the moment it is profoundly recovery because silence as well as tranquility are recovery.' -Jon Kabat-Zinn

' It's what you are believing and also thinking that is the reason of suffering, not the individual, thing, outside item, or condition.' -Byron Katie, owner of The Work, a procedure of questions in order to help finish suffering

' Qualities like kindness as well as concern are like language, we need to be raised in a linguistic area in order for that organic tendency to create. It may be very similar for compassion, the seeds exist from the beginning ... we require a compassionate area for those seeds to flourish.' -Dr. Richard Davidson

' Some of the most vital conversations are the ones we have with ourselves.' -Sherry Turkle, professor of the social research studies of scientific research as well as innovation at Massachusetts Institute of Innovation, creator as well as supervisor of the MIT Campaign on Modern technology and also Self

' The poets are appointed the task of claiming something significant that words cannot possibly share. All this [self-inquiry] is poetry, and also you are verse.' -Jon Kabat-Zinn

' Become part of the intensity of this moment and also acknowledge suffering and see exactly how you could end suffering in your life and in this world.' -Roshi Joan Halifax

' Among traits that makes contemplative practice different from sporting activities, music, etc., in its effects on the brain is that when we muffle cushion or chair as well as engage in method we invoke the intention that we do this not mostly for me, yet instead, for advantage of others. Conjuring up that objective ... is a radical act of generosity that is so fundamental to the context with which these methods first developed. This is variably maintained. Researchers should study exactly what invoking that objective in and also of itself could do.' -Dr. Richard Davidson

' It starts with us. It's regarding existing every day. Do the deep personal job, it's enjoyable, it's effective, it's jazzing up, it's releasing. I'm 64 and also I have more power than when I was 24 as well as I know its since I'm shedding points that encumbered me. Practice on a daily basis. We matter and also our voices issue.' -Eileen Fisher, designer as well as owner of EILEEN FISHER

' Discomfort is where individuals take note. it's a blunder for us in order to help ease people's discomfort yet to recognize it, follow it, have some insight concerning where do we go next off, as well as have devices where we could be more existing. it's the sturdy atmospheres that permit us to check how well we are able to stand in the center of mayhem.' -Michael Gervais, Ph.D., psycho therapist specializing in high performance and also sports

' Travel is exactly how I make a living, yet tranquility is how I make a life. Traveling is how I enhance your house of my life, however stillness is exactly how I lay the structure.' -Pico Iyer, writer of numerous books consisting of The Art of Stillness

' I'm not worried regarding life after fatality, what i'm most curious about is life prior to death. That is the curriculum regarding i'm worried.' -Jon Kabat-Zinn

' Inspect your watch-it's simply outstanding! It's currently again! It's not also 10 to currently, it's now!' -Jon Kabat-Zinn

' Digital conversation has gotten us familiar with modified life. It may be that unedited life is the most worth living.' -Sherry Turkle

' Consider that is resting on the sidelines, since if we can include them, our conversations will be richer.' -Laura Powers, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of CODE2040, a nonprofit that creates pathways to success in the technology economic situation for blacks and latino/as

' Vanity develops an actually large split, in which we orient ourselves towards feeding the photo of self as opposed to the actual self.' -Alanis Morissette, singer-songwriter

' I'm also lazy to meditate as well as I'm also unskillful to do yoga, tai chi, or qi gong. If my partner were right here she 'd claim all this individual ever does is meditate. As an author we are paid to rest still, look through the delusions as well as estimates of our thoughts and locate exactly what holds true.' -Pico Iyer

' For as lengthy as room remains, and also as lengthy as beings remain, might I too continue to be as well as resolve the suffering of this globe.' -Roshi Joan Halifax

' Humanity is inside about just how we deal with each other. It's regarding respect, openness, as well as being prone.' -Martin Tracey, vice president of international talent at Starbucks

' Anything that is less than kind [in us] is false recognition.' -Byron Katie

' Concern is not spiritual business, it is human company. It is not a high-end, it is necessary for our own tranquility as well as psychological security. It is essential for human survival.' -Dalai Lama

' Business can't buy interaction, yet they could develop the conditions for credibility in the work environment.' -Golbie Kamarei, worldwide program supervisor for BlackRock Resources's Worldwide Customer and Sales Quality Program

' Individuals don't last long at EILEEN FISHER if they're not kind.' -Eileen Fisher

' Take a breath as well as say this [racism] becomes part of humankind. We were born right into a racist culture and also everyone is touched by it. It remains in us and as a result we really have to recognize the manner in which it is as well as just after that when we've done that the injury whichever component of it you're in ... then you could obtain interested, then you can get quiet.' -Jack Kornfield, introducing meditation educator and also writer of multiple publications consisting of A Wise Heart: An Overview of the Universal Teachings of Buddhist Psychology

' I like treatment. I would certainly never have started my company without it.' -Eileen Fisher

' There are many kinds of jails, consisting of the ones we placed ourselves in.' -Roshi Joan Halifax

' What happens if we might live life as if no person minute is a lot more important than an additional, that's how i see it at the very least.' -Soren Gordhamer, founder of Wisdom 2.0

' Health is not any various from learning to play the violin. If you practice you will certainly obtain much better.' -Dr. Richard Davidson