#philip schofield
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
obsoletegleam · 2 months ago
Text
Smash Hits (UK) 1992
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Issue 342, 8th January - 21st January 1992 Issue 343, 22nd January - 4th February 1992 Issue 344, 5th February - 18th February 1992 Issue 345, 19th February - 3rd March 1992 Issue 346, 4th March - 17th March 1992 Issue 347, 18th March - 31st March 1992 Issue 348, 1st April - 14th April 1992 Issue 349, 15th April - 28th April 1992 Issue 350, 29th April - 12th May 1992 Issue 351, 13th May - 26th May 1992 Issue 352, 27th May - 9th June 1992 Issue 353, 10th June - 23rd June 1992 Issue 354, 24th June - 7th July 1992 Issue 355, 8th July - 21st July 1992 Issue 356, 22nd July - 4th August 1992 Issue 357, 5th August - 18th August 1992 Issue 358, 19th August - 1st September 1992 Issue 359, 2nd September - 15th September 1992 Issue 360, 16th September - 29th September 1992 Issue 361, 30th September - 13th October 1992 Issue 362, 14th October - 27th October 1992 Issue 363, 28th October - 10th November 1992 Issue 364, 11th November - 24th November 1992 Issue 365, 25th November - 8th December 1992 Issue 366, 9th December - 22nd December 1992 Issue 337, 23rd December 1992 - 5th January 1993
At Smash Hits Remembered
6 notes · View notes
cheeseknives · 2 years ago
Text
Learned about Schofield's grooming case, not because our very own tabloid site I was reading had article about it, but because they had one about Clarkson's two cents about the situation ????
Tumblr media
24 notes · View notes
fuckyeahilike · 2 years ago
Text
Gay men do not pose the same threat as lesbians do, given it is women who are the means of reproduction (both sexual and social). Therefore, most ideological pressure to conform sexually is put onto women. Gay men don’t escape societal coercion, but it is women who are targeted most, particularly during our fertile years when we can be sexually reproductive. It should be no surprise that most women trying to escape that pressure cooker by ‘transitioning’, or calling themselves queer, are under the age of 40 i.e within their fertile years. In contrast most men who ‘transition’ or identify as women are typically heterosexual and middle-aged. Having already had a wife and children, they now want to enjoy their autogynephilic fetish whilst their children’s mother gets on with the washing and cleaning. Any men, at any time of life, can expect a household servant and free babysitter, whether it’s their wives or mothers. Men’s domestic and sexual freedoms remain uncurtailed throughout their lives. No one blinks when a man like Philip Schofield ‘comes out’ at age 58 after talking to teenage boys on social media. No one claimed Schofield cannot really be gay because he was married to a woman and they had several children together. No one finds implausible that a decorated male Olympic athlete may reinvent himself as a woman at age 65. Men are the masters of their own sexual subjectivity and meaning.
Jen Izaakson is a lesbian feminist and Marxist. Jen has just completed a PhD thesis on the question of ideology and indeterminacy in Freud and Queer Theory.
12 notes · View notes
tomhardysurinal · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
Fucking LOSING it at who is on the TV in the background on The Morning Show omfg
8 notes · View notes
lostf1ndaydream · 2 years ago
Text
For once a motorsports-related governing body has done the right thing in ditching Jack Nicholls.
I’m glad he’s gone, but I’m just overwhelmingly disappointed that we live in a world where this still happens so often.
Please, men, do better.
7 notes · View notes
ileolai · 2 years ago
Text
i hope philip schofield chokes on his vape
3 notes · View notes
oneoflokis-blog · 2 years ago
Text
Schofield? Schmofield. 😏 (& the same to everyone obsessed by his sex life. 😏)
Yes. well, as I've said on quite a number of occasions to various people, all this celebrity stuff, in particular, is for the birds. I know I've said "for the birds" quite a few times recently, I think. But pretty much all celebrity stuff, is for me now, in particular celebrity sex scandals, or pseudo scandals, whether homosexual or heterosexual, whether they would involve Philip Schofield, or I don't know Prince Harry and Meghan Markle! Are a complete waste of time as news, particularly from the viewpoint, of any sincere and informed socialist. Well ... I know that quite a few people use or tend to use celebrity issues, as a way of relating themselves to more general issues: or even simply so that they have something to talk about, and everybody else will know what it is they're talking about.
But: this is simply a very shallow way to relate to the world. And you do have to remember, that the more time people spend on line or anywhere else, talking about celebrities, and gossiping about them, the less time they and the actual media will have to concentrate on ordinary people and talk about them and about issues that matter.
So it's a question of where the focus should be! 🙂
And don't give me that stuff all about how immoral Phillip Schofield or someone like him is. He actually fits into an a number of very normal in inverted commas cliches: that of the boss who has an affair with his secretary, which this is the equivalent of; then there's the established gay trope of the much older and more experienced man with a lot younger man, and so on and so forth. To suggest that this is anything extraordinary or criminal is simply naive. It's both naive and hypocritical: which unfortunately both are very prevalent features of contemporary British society. 😏
As I told to that Wolf person or whatever his name was on a fairly recent Twitter thread, I know exactly why - the web of reasons why - this Phillip Schofield thing is being made the most tremendous fuss of on social media right now. As I told him, it is partially mass hysteria which is fueled by the mainstream media; Britain goes through a paedophile panic every so often, which was once very neatly satirised by the satirical program Brass Eye! 🙂
And secondly, to go along with the mass hysteria, we also have a sort of mass collective guilt, which was really sparked off by, and has been hanging around for years, due to the failure by the police, the media and I suppose ultimately the public, to catch and expose Jimmy Savile as the kind of predator he was. As I also said on Twitter, worrying about Savile really is shutting the stable door after the horse has indeed bolted. 😏
But the comparisons being made, particularly on YouTube right now, between Schofield and Savile, are quite simply ridiculous and obviously completely unwarranted. Often they are done by insinuation: like with the juxtaposition of a picture of one with a picture of the other, both Photoshopped so as to look extremely unpleasant, particularly on the thumbnail where everyone can see it. This is both clickbait and libel of the worst variety and it should not be allowed by YouTube, and it should be removed. But we all know they're much more interested in censoring political channels.
Yes. This smearing by
association: that is something the modern mainstream media are well known to do. **Usually when they are producing some type of propaganda or another.** Mr Corbyn got plenty of that: but that's another matter.
And we also notice - at least I do - that most of the fuss about Schofield, at least that which has revealed itself in my YouTube feed, and nearly all the smears about Schofield, are produced by right wing sites, the likes of GB News, and further right. The kind of poisonous sneery tone, of a lot of these obviously non-socialist sites towards Schofield; denote to me two things. And often I think it's a mixture of the two! Namely, a kind of poisonous - when is it never poisonous - schadenfreude brought on by jealousy of a very successful career (some of these tubers are obviously people on the peripheries of showbiz). Second would be the still commonly felt among right wingers hostility towards homosexuals. Which they are cunningly attempting to disguise as something completely else: but I believe I can read the real emotional and ideological message particularly behind some of the more sneery type of channels. If you didn't hate gays, and you weren't jealous pricks, you wouldn't be sneering! is my conclusion. 🤷‍♀️
I don't really care whether a person is "moral", by the way. But I do care about fairness. The current treatment of Schofield, and the juxtaposition with Savile, is most certainly unfair. 😏
Anyway: the modern left, well most of it, doesn't appear to care about fairness: and once again quite stupidly they appear to have fallen for another scam. Or a mass hysteria; or a witch hunt; whatever one wants to call it. Similar to with the #itwasascam antisemitism thing really. 😏 Well at least, I can see them cheering it along on Twitter. I don't know if any left YouTuber has made any pieces positive or negative about Schofield: I haven't seen any of the ones I follow cover it, I haven't really looked. 🤷‍♀️
And similar of course to #metoo; which died a death really, with the flop of Amber Heard. And a bloody good thing it did!
What I'm saying - the conclusion I have come to - is the all these kind of celebrity things, when even not total smears, are a complete waste of time: and should not be touched with a barge pole by the left.
In fact, I would ban all this type of idea of social justice! That they think is social justice anyway; when really it's based on media bullying and Twitter dog piling; and doesn't achieve anything anyway. Much like that other pompous person on a Twitter thread I was on a couple of days ago was saying something like I was stopping successors of Savile from being hunted down! 😄 Like a) Schofield was anything at all like Savile; and like b) this fellow or a bunch of his fellow nerds on Twitter were going to do anything of the sort! Rotfl. 🤣 More people with a stupid keyboard warrior superhero complex! 😏👎
That's what I think. 😏😄
2 notes · View notes
opinionsofmine · 3 months ago
Text
It’s so weird to me that people cancelled Philip Schofield and not Cheryl Cole, when they’re both groomers. Reeks of homophobia tbh. I’ve seen people act like Cheryl only met Liam once. She didn’t. He was involved with her throughout filming. And even still, imagine dating someone you even KNEW and saw as a prepubescent teen. Shits weird.
1 note · View note
thefrogsennaneverfound · 6 months ago
Text
I’m fairly certain the guy doing the talking is a very young Philip Schofield. Am I right? X
Random guy: There's one thing I hate, parties at James Hunt's house
James Hunt: Champagne anybody? 😁
90 notes · View notes
stelly38 · 5 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Who makes the best husband? I updated my 'Aidan's Characters as Husband Material' to include a few more recent roles. There's a new winner, for me at least, with the addition of these roles: Declan O'Hara takes first place, while Russel would be a good back-up. And as always, I just can't deal without plumbing and birth control, so these things are mentioned on each card.
56 notes · View notes
soffecoeur · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Pou and Kendal Coyne Schofield for the official puck drop, MTL at MIN, January 6th 2024
6 notes · View notes
oh2e · 1 year ago
Text
The way The Thick of It jokes about Hugh Abbot (Chris Langham), Huw Edwards and Philip Schofield and I, here in 2024, sit knowing things they do not
Tumblr media
9 notes · View notes
glowinggreeneyes-e · 1 year ago
Text
rip julian ghosts you would have loved lost marys
my absolute favourite running joke in the Ghosts fandom is any and every variation of "RIP [ghost] you would have loved [modern thing]"
259 notes · View notes
thepwhlrookie · 1 month ago
Text
PWHL Hit Stats Per Team
There was a lot of interesting comments on my last hit stats post (specifically about the Sirens and Victoire) so I thought I would expand on my findings!
Boston Fleet:
Megan Keller: 25 (league leader)
Emily Brown: 21
Jessica Digirolamo: 21
Shay Maloney: 19
Daniela Pejsova: 13
Minnesota Frost:
Kendall Coyne Schofield: 23
Taylor Heise: 21
Britta Curl-Salemme: 13
Klara Hymlarova: 11
Denisa Křížová: 9
Montréal Victoire
Marie-Philip Poulin: 10
Erin Ambrose: 6
Anna Wilgren: 6
Alexandra Labelle: 5
(Four way tie): 4
New York Sirens: 
Allyson Simpson: 10
Abby Roque: 9
Jamie Bourbonnais: 8
Micah Zandee-Hart: 6
(Six way tie): 5
Ottawa Charge: 
Emily Clark: 16
Aneta Tejralová: 13
Tereza Vanišová: 12
Ronja Savolainen: 10
Jocelyne Larocque: 8
Toronto Sceptres: 
Emma Maltais: 20
Renata Fast: 18
Allie Munroe: 16
Blayre Turnbull: 14
Julia Gosling: 12
95 notes · View notes
flo-zoinks · 2 months ago
Note
May I ask what ship it was?
Of course!!!
Now this isnt to hate on the ship or anything just my PERSONAL opinion 😭 yall do what u wanna do😭🙏
I do not like Morston☠
HEAR ME OUT THO
As someone who comes from a family with like step-family that weren't actually married into the fam, but still considered step family / found family, the idea of even having relations with like a step COUSIN I'd known for only 5 years grossed me tf out, let alone someone youd known since they were TWELVE and consider your brother living together every day with common 'Father Figures'
And also, Arthur met John when he was 12 (? I think?). I think to know someone that closely since before the age of puberty just rules out having any thoughts past familial to most people, unless you're like Philip Schofield and still yall remember the hate he got on that??? Idk I just think its a weird premise teaching a child how to hunt and stuff then trynna do them when they legal. Feels a bit like grooming to see in that light (just to me atleast definitely not saying it is)
Finally ion really see the chemistry if I'm being fr. They to me are just so close in a familial light the idea of anything different is just foreign, and their actions kinda show that with how casual they are around each other but don't actually try to actively be in each others presence, unless with a specific motive. I think most people who could see a person past that family/friend zone often hang near someone and around them just to be next to them, or because their enjoy them. Siblings are similar too I suppose but more out of a casual sense that they just are linked by family, so will be around each other forever. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
Anywho, what do you think???? I wanna hear ur opinion too 🙏😚
THIS ISN'T HATE TO THE MORSTON FANS ITS JUST ME OK
54 notes · View notes
zamulas · 7 months ago
Text
hottest PWHL captain results!!
the results are in!
257 of you voted and here's what you had to say...
winner: hilary knight (pwhl boston), 108 votes
2nd place: marie-philip poulin (pwhl montreal), 106 votes
3rd place: micah zandee-hart (pwhl new york), 18 votes
4th place: brianne jenner (pwhl ottawa), 16 votes
5th place: blayre turnbell (pwhl toronto), 7 votes
6th place: kendall coyne schofield (pwhl minnesota), 2 votes
Tumblr media
thank you so much to all who participated! keep an eye out, because i'll be doing an alt captains poll soon!
86 notes · View notes