#perceived quality

[wolfchans]

BANG CHAN ♡ GIANT MV

[cqrvidart]

get this man some chapstick PLEASE

[amid-fandoms]

dan’s commitment issues don’t extend to phil simply because phil isn’t a commitment, he’s part of him, a physical extension that he realistically at this point probably couldn’t live without

[buddhamethods]

-Compliment each other, huh? You two deserve the hashtag #KongthapAtom.

My Love Mix-Up! (2024) dir. Au Kornprom Niyomsil

[augustameretrix]

losing it over the level of details of the darn fingernails in the models and in the coloring/shading... vi has long nail beds and curved nails, her thumbs' are especially broad, she either lets them or cant help but let them grow beyond the bed (btw the colors there... extraordinary. makes her nails look kinda brittle) and when she shortens them she just clips them, resulting in an uneven and frayed edge

notice how she has to place her fingers parallel to the surfaces she's touching in order not to scratch them (also re: that third pic, is she double-jointed? my thumbs cant do that)

whereas cait has shorter nail beds and flat, square-ish nails which she clips and files often.

and again the artists keep that in mind when making cait's hands very very grabby. she can (likes to?) feel everything on her fingertips, all the way to the front, right up to where the skin meets the nail, so she flexes her distal phalanges to get that grip

fortiche i owe you my life for keeping track of the characters' distinct nails + fingers

[slutneto]

presented without comment

[gordonsicedcoffee]

Leigh Whannell on Recovery (1999)

extra:

me when I fckn GET u

[serpentface]

This family dinner is gonna fucking suck

[risingsunresistance]

who would win, god of the realm or one (1) hog 🐖

[okolnir]

[ #49. Keep Warm ]

surprise we're back

___________________________________________

Read more at >>>>

♫ the official website AMONGST US ♫ Amongst Us tumblr♫ TAPAS ♫ WEBTOONS.

read ★ Carciphona

Episode list: [ 1 ][ 2 ][ 3 ][ 4 ][ 5 ][ 6 ][ 6.5 ][ 7 ][ 8 ][ 9 ][ 10 ]

[ 11 ][ 12 ][ 13 ][ 14 ][ 15 ][ 16 ][ 17 ][ 18 ][ 19 ][ 20 ]

[ 21 ][ 22 ][ 23 ][ 24 ][ 25 ][ 26 ][ 27 ][ 28 ][ 29 ][ 30 ]

[ 31 ][ 32 ][ 33 ][ 34 ][ 35 ][ 36 ][ 37 ][ 38 ][ 39 ][ 40 ]

[ 41 ][ 42 ][ 43 ][ 44 ][ 45 ][ 46.1 ][ 46.2 ][ 47.1 ][ 47.2 ][ 48.1 ][ 48.2 ][ 48.3 ][ 48.4 ][ 49 ][ next ]

[weakly-skoodge]

Week Ninety Six!

[ninoochat]

Mikhailo Aleksandr Milkovich, the yin to my yang

[fivewholeminutes]

A Series of Small Offerings

PART TWO -1- The Night Does Not Belong To God

The whites of your eyes / Turn black in the low light

I am genuinely proud of this one. I'm shocked my two hands were able to produce this, i haven't touched any paint for at least 15 years before this (technically made a tiny painting a few weeks before this one, but shhh).

Shortened the original prompt's lyrics a bit, sorry, Lev!! I focused on the literal meaning of the whites turning black for months.

A bit clarer version (you can see where i put too much paint oops):

[foolsocracy]

Now having watched Frankenstein (1931) I find this really interesting. I didn't really expect the writers themselves to have watched the film; I assumed they saw it was a horror film released in Pete's time and included it with the bonus that the audience would know the story because its Frankenstein. It really aligns with the themes of spider noir though, so I'm second guessing myself.

I read Frankenstein a while back so I'm not as familiar with it as I once was, but I'd say its generous to say the movie is based off of the original novel. It hits some of the points but it really is different. I mean, in the film its Henry Frankenstein, not even Victor.

In the film, the monster is played almost-infantile. He reaches out towards light as if he could grab it. He plays with a little girl by a lake, throwing in flowers to watch them float like boats. When he kills her, it's an accident. How could he have known that she wouldn't float along with the flowers? Its Frankenstein and his assistant who are portrayed as monstrous. They lock him in the dark for three days. The intimidate him with fire and whips and fists.

Despite this, its Frankenstein who gets the 'good end,' while the monster is left to burn alive, pinned inside a wooden mill set alight by the townspeople.

Pete could have gotten nightmares from a number of scenes. Although I wouldn't personally say this is a scary film, there are definitely unnerving parts. There was also a different standard in 1931 for what was scary in film, plus Pete was already living a hard life at such a young age when he saw it.

Based on the panels themselves it is clear that Pete was scared of the monster itself (which is fair, the make up and costuming wanted him to be frightening). "I expected him to tell me there's no such thing as monsters," because no one in real life is a resurrected, looming... once-man-now-creature. (Just you wait, Peter). It's a more juvenile read of the film but Pete is a kid. Ben though, is a veteran, a socialist, has been around the block. He has the sense to analyze the film and interpret it differently. It is the men who find themselves with a capacity for senseless cruelty that are the monsters. That is exactly what the noir comics are about.

I really like that it's clear that Uncle Ben knows what Peter is about to learn. It also shows how much Pete has changed, just within the 1-2 years since he'd seen Frankenstein.

[jynjackets]

VelCinta Sapphic Semptember ➱ Day 9: Battle

Battlefront II Barbies Heroes

insp.

[legionofpotatoes]

star wars outlaws