#lydiasheart
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Finally, in John 6:67, Jesus turns to His twelve hand-picked disciples and asks them the question, “Do you also want to go away?” It’s an interesting question because Jesus chose or elected the Twelve...Calvinists should truly examine John 6:67 because it doesn’t lend credence to their convictions about God and man in salvation. Here we see the divine election doesn’t eliminate the possibility of departing from Christ or falling away from the gospel. The Twelve were chosen by Jesus, yet Jesus gives them an option to depart. If Jesus handpicks them, yet says they can leave, why do Calvinists insist that modern-day disciples, the elect, cannot fall away from Christ or depart from the faith if they too, are elected by God?
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 302-303
3 notes · View notes
kazekashi · 11 years ago
Text
lydiasheart replied to your photo: “also they had these ridiculous scarves at Winners”
ur so cute leave
omg this is my best friend but she is super cute!!
0 notes
ao3feed-larry · 11 years ago
Text
The World is Ugly, But You're Beautiful to Me
by lydiasheart
Louis has always helped Harry when he gets like this, holding while he cries and even throwing away his blades. But what happens when Harry is on the edge and Louis isn't there to help?
  Or Louis is forced to spend time with Eleanor when Harry's on the verge of a break down but Louis isn't gone as long as Harry thinks he's going to be.
Words: 2235, Chapters: 1/1, Language: English
Fandoms: One Direction (Band)
Rating: Not Rated
Warnings: Author Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings
Categories: M/M
Characters: Liam Payne, Zayn Malik, Niall Horan, Eleanor Calder
Relationships: Harry Styles/Louis Tomlinson
Additional Tags: trigger warning, LITERALLY, pls don't read if you're easily triggered, Fluff, Fluffy Ending
via AO3 works tagged 'Harry/Louis' http://bit.ly/14ES5sa
3 notes · View notes
hellowednesday · 12 years ago
Note
If I had a night alone with you... we'd watch perks and talk a lot and laugh a lot and probably blog a little bit. We'd bond a bunch, cry a little and become best friends. We'd eat and complain and take pictures and dress up. I'd introduce you to the miracles of marijuana and you'd show me what it's like to have 1.5k followers. xo
DONT FORGET OMEGLE ILY
[this is a queued ask message but follow lydia anyway because she's perfect bye]
1 note · View note
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
In Luke 22:3, Satan enters Judas. The words “Satan entered Judas” remind us that Judas’s decision to betray Jesus was more serious in nature than just not trusting his friend. When Judas agreed to betray Jesus, he was, in effect, giving up his faith, his salvation, his discipleship, his relationship to Christ, for thirty pieces of silver. Judas’s actions are nothing short of apostasy -- a falling away from Christ, a giving up and turning away from one’s formerly professed faith. It is, to bring back the analogy of Lot’s wife, to “turn back” from salvation and live in sin (Luke 17:32). It is a reversal of the prodigal son’s actions: from coming home to returning to the pig slop in some strange countryside.
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 281-282. 
1 note · View note
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Saul, a regenerate, a man made anew by God and given another heart (1 Samuel 10:9), rebels against the Lord and watches as the Holy Spirit departs from his life. Calvin tries to explain how regeneration works in the Institutes but remains eerily silent on how it is that Saul is regenerate and given 'special grace' but is then 'justly punished' by the Lord in that he loses the Holy Spirit and gains an evil spirit..if Saul, a regenerate man, loses the Holy Spirit, then does this not refute Calvinism entirely? After all, Calvin says that the elect cannot fall away.
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” page 227
1 note · View note
essentialpastor · 5 years ago
Quote
"Without an open heart and mind, Lydia couldn’t hear, understand, and respond to the gospel message (Acts 16:11-15). What this teaches us is that Christ takes the divine initiative in salvation. That is, before we can respond to God, He reaches out in love and embraces us, pursues us. Without God opening our hearts, we cannot respond. This fact for Lydia and modern-day Christians reminds us of just how deep in sin we truly are. When someone says that we are “totally depraved,” it means that we are, to use Paul’s phrase, “dead in trespasses and sins” (Ephesians 2:1, 5). We are so dead in our sins that “He made us alive” (Ephesians 2:1, 4). He is the one who causes us to come alive and understand the gospel, to see our sin and our need for Jesus to save us from sin. If we can credit anyone with our salvation, as Lydia could, Jesus is the one who gets all the credit -- not us. We see the divine initiative in the Lord opening her heart, making a response to Him possible. Had God not opened Lydia’s heart, she wouldn’t have been able to respond in faith. If God didn’t open our hearts in the context of gospel preaching, we wouldn’t have come out of sin and been saved, either. We, like Lydia, owe our salvation to God, who opens our depraved, hard hearts and minds to receive Jesus and see ourselves from the divine perspective (that is, humanity needs to be saved from its sins).
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 364-366
0 notes
essentialpastor · 5 years ago
Quote
Acts 16:25-34 concerns the Philippian jailer. Paul and Silas are jailed for preaching and teaching the gospel, and they land in jail where a man from Philippi has a duty to look after them. At midnight, they were singing and praising God when all of a sudden, an earthquake came and shook off the chains of Paul and Silas. The Philippian jailer, figuring that Paul and Silas would escape and that he would be killed instead, prepared to kill himself (Acts 16:27). Once Paul saw what the jailer was about to do, he told the jailer not to kill himself. The jailer realized his plight. If an earthquake could come and free these gospel preachers from prison, then their God must be real! And at that moment, the text says that 'he called for a light, ran in, and fell down trembling before Paul and Silas. And he brought them out and said, 'Sirs, what must I do to be saved?' (Acts 16:29-30) Paul and Silas respond, 'Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household' (Acts 16:31). Paul and Silas do not respond to the Philippian jailer with the words, 'God elects believers, so there's nothing you can do in the salvation process.' They don't respond with, 'Well, it's not up to you.' No, instead, they tell the jailer to do something: believe. If he believes, he can be saved, and if his household believes, they can, too...Even the jailer's salvation shows us that faith comes before salvation.
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 324-325
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
To go from being graced by the Lord to being deserted by the Lord (Saul) shows that God’s grace is resistible and that the elect, contrary to John Calvin, can fall away. To go from being elected by God to be a disciple, then have Satan enter him (Judas) are signs that, contra John Calvin, the elect can fall away. When your theological system cannot accommodate the hardest cases of Scripture, it is a good indication that your theological system is flawed beyond repair. Calvinism can attempt to explain the salvation of others, but Saul, Judas, Demas, and other apostates in Scripture don’t find an accurate explanation in Calvinism. If God regenerates individuals who can then fall away from God, then regeneration isn’t irresistible. It is resistible, plain and simple. A resistible regeneration suggests that God is committed to human choice, genuine human freedom.
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 314-315
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Jesus lost none of those God the Father gave Him, except for Judas. Judas was one of those given who didn’t remain. As Jesus called Judas “Friend,” He also called the other eleven disciples His friends as well (John 15:15). This tells us that Judas wasn’t just a “decoy disciple” masquerading as a real one in order to betray Jesus. And Judas didn’t become a disciple with the intention to betray Jesus from the beginning. Apostasy, or falling away from the gospel and Christ, just doesn’t happen like that. His love of money doesn’t sit well with his election to salvation, but then and again, sin never sits well with God’s calling in the lives of His children. To see Judas in proper perspective, we must see ourselves and realize that we, like Judas, have our own sin. Does that sin nullify our election? No. But sin can destroy our election if we do not cling to Christ and leave sin behind. Judas couldn’t part with his sin and, when given the choice, left Christ instead. What did it profit him to gain thirty pieces of silver while losing his own soul?
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 311-312
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Jesus says that, of those God gave Him, 'none of them is lost except the son of perdition' (John 17:12). If the 'son of perdition,' Judas, is the only exception to the rule that 'of those that You gave Me, none of them is lost,' then that implies that Judas was one God the Father gave to Jesus, and...Judas was a believer who was eventually lost. The phrase for Judas, 'son of perdition,' refers to destruction or damnation (Hebrews 10:39)." #LydiasHeart #prevenientgrace #grace #Judas #sonofperdition #John1712 #Hebrews1039
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” page 308
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Jesus asks the disciples if they want to depart from Him (John 6). It doesn't appear from Jesus' words that the disciples couldn't depart, but rather, that they had a free will choice and they could stay or go. When Peter, the leader of the group speaks, he asks Jesus in response to His question, 'Lord, to whom shall we go?' (John 6:66). Peter assumes that he can depart from Christ, and that the disciples can too. So, his question is the logical next step: "If we disciples can leave Jesus, where, or to whom, do we go? Who can we turn to if we turn away from Jesus?' This doesn't sound as though Peter believed he couldn't depart from Jesus. Rather, Peter believed that, if he departed, no one else had the words of eternal life. He couldn't have eternal life if he departed from Christ.
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pp. 305-306
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Matthew 10 gives us the names of the twelve disciples, and Judas is listed among them. And yet, if Matthew 10:1 is correct, Judas is as elected by God as the other eleven disciples: He too, is given “power over unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all kinds of sickness and all kinds of disease” (Matthew 10:1)...it wouldn't make sense for Jesus to give supernatural power against the very powers of darkness Judas would have been working for, in such a scenario. If Jesus found the logic of Satan casting out demons to be ludicrous (Matthew 12:22-30), He would find the idea that He chose Judas only for the betrayal to be just as ludicrous...you don't give power over evil spirits to evil spirits and then think that your 'house' will stand. Jesus gave this statement to the Pharisees, but it's very probable that He lived this out in selecting and empowering His chosen twelve disciples."
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace, pp. 269-273
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Calvin calls Saul 'a new man' and says that God gave Saul a special grace that he didn't give other men -- referring, of course, to regeneration...but look at what he says of King Saul later on when the Lord sends an evil spirit on him: 'The evil spirit that troubled Saul is said to be from the Lord (1 Sam. 16:14), to intimate that Saul's madness was a just punishment from God.' What we have in Saul is a man who, once regenerated, elected, and made a new man by God, rebels against God, turns back from following Him, and watches as the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit, departs from his life. Saul proves that the grace of God is resistible, if no other person does.
Deidre Richardson, “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace, pp. 192, 193
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
There are two things we should take away from this passage of Scripture (Matthew 25:31-46). First, there is the fact that Heaven was created for humans but Hell was not. When Jesus talks to the sheep, He tells them about 'the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world (Matt. 25:34); when He gives the goats their judgment, He tells them 'Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels' (Matt. 25:41). Heaven is prepared for humans...but Hell was never prepared for one single person. Think about that: we were made for Heaven, but none of us were designed or created for Hell.
Deidre Richardson, author of “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” pages 127-128. 
0 notes
essentialpastor · 6 years ago
Quote
Thus, God saves infants as infants, without any regard to moral culpability or responsibility because they can't know good or evil. But, think on this: if infants are given grace, and we all are born into the world as infants, then we all are given grace. Every person, from the highest-ranking political official to the lowest and most vile human being, has been given grace by God when he or she is born in this world. Adolf Hitler had as much infant grace as Billy Graham. Osama Bin Laden had as much infant grace as Desmond Tutu or the Roman Catholic Pope. Think about it. If infant grace exists, then we've all been blessed to have had it at one time or another.
Deidre Richardson, author of “Lydia’s Heart: The Case for Prevenient Grace,” page 76. 
0 notes