#just wanted to add creds for my new icon
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
narcolepticelf · 3 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
Hi my names Damien (but you can call me anything from my pronouny! ) I primarly use He/They,but neos are listed there as well ^-^ . I don't really have a carrd yet but I'll make one eventually. I do art [ #zzz.img ] !
Most recent art Here [c!quackity las nevadas finale art]
I interact from my main [ @sunflowerseraph ]
!! Icon creds here. !!
If ur breaking mutuals lmk pls ^_^ !! More under the cut
Tumblr media
Greatest hits: eret answered our ask, I've met Karl,Austin, Boomer, and Ted !
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I main Foolish,Punz,Quackity,Wilbur,Sapnap,George,Karl,Tina,Techno ♡ and other non dsmp/Osmp/mcyt streamers (Sneegsnag,Boomer Slimcecicle Ted) P much chucky sammy? :) idk what else to add here but uhmm yeah! Just ask me who I like ig ^0^
Tumblr media
We are a system! If you ever see someone sign off/tag with an emoji and you don't know who they are don't hesitate to ask! Friends can ask for our SimplyPlural. We have a Twitter (Main-NarcolepticElf , Alt-SeraphimSyss and Priv-PunzMaleWife ) we also have a marvel/dc/darkhorse/comics/etc twt under KonshusAvatars !!
I almost always try to tag my blog for easy navigation and triggers (for example: blood tw, tw blood, blood) or for specific characters (for example: c!sapnap, c!sapnap art, cc content, cc art ) hope that makes sense! Lmk if u need anything trigger tagged and I'll do my best to remember it!!
Hate proshippers with my whole heart. Please don't send heavy angst/gore regarding c!tommy !!!! Always happy to talk about characters from the dsmp!
Tumblr media
Ok. Heavy stuff ig ! I don't talk much on the dream situation because I have My own issues/problems/trauma things lol! Don't pressure me to talk abt it. Don't send me asks or links or "proof" or "evidence" or whatever. I don't have a positive view of CC Dream anymore. But if I see anyone trying to start shit with Cc/C Dream Introjects I will slay you with my sword. Just bc I don't interact with Cc dream content anymore doesn't mean I have dropped The rest of the dsmp/mcyt streamers! I still mildly enjoy lore, but my Hyperfixation on the Dsmp as a whole has greatly diminished (its BEEN dying, even before the whole drm situation.) I'm not really gonna comb my whole blog for like mentions of him or whatever to delete because that's 1: tedious 2: tiresome and 3: time consuming. And I am constantly tired and busy with Real Life Things. 👍 anyways idk what else to put here but !! Thank u all ^_^ !!!!!
This blog mostly runs on a queue, and it may have old content in it! I'll probably delete anything that Bothers me, but I don't check it often.
Tumblr media
12 notes · View notes
babybuckleys · 4 years ago
Text
Dating Rafe Cameron includes....
a/n: basically what dating the older cameron sibling entails which is quite a lot. (creds to @drewstarkey for the gif) this is very different from what ive written. hope you guys like it. i will do the rest of the characters if you guys want.
warnings: some smexy thoughts.
Tumblr media
i feel like dating rafe would be hot.
just hot. that's how I'd describe it.
or eventful.
i feel like casual dates wouldn't be an actual thing in the relationship.
i know that sounds bad but hear me out.
i feel like rafe is not a date guy but when you do go on dates its usually different things on the boat.
so either dinner, picnics, lazily cuddling, watching movies, just enjoying each other's presence, making out, midnight sex.
of course stealing the boat.
late night shenanigans. hehehe.
and then when he's like on a coke craze you're really the only one who can calm him down.
sometimes you guys would get into nasty fights which would maybe end in you crying but this man does not back down.
cause he is one stubborn bitch.
try to get him to stop with the drugs and slowly he does.
or like when he breakdowns, he needs a hug from you. And you just wrap your arms around him and rock back and forth until he calms down.
you would probably get along with sarah but he would be like we probably shouldn't socialize with her.
since you're the only thing he truly only cares about.
will only open up to you.
late night talks.
late nigh high talks.
ok now to the smexy stuff.
sex. sex. oh and yeah sex.
rough sex.
soft sex.
hickeys EVERYWHERE!!
quickies EVERYWHERE!!
riding him.
trying new things like riding his thigh. oof.
that one tik tok songs that goes. "i'll put you in seven positions for 70 minutes."
rafe can be a very dominant personality and most of the time dominate in bed.
but like every once in a while he'll like you taking control.
it usually depends on his mood how he is.
a fight. rough.
a breakdown. soft.
wants to show you he cares. soft. & rough.
you can not tell me this boy does not have a choking kink.
he likes seeing your eyes roll back. woo wee.
hands on your thighs at all time.
soft aftercare the day after cause he maybe went a bit too far the day before.
ok i think that's enough smexy. time for soft again.
every once in a while he would get you presents.
this boy doesn't seem like the softest but every once in a while he is and SJDNSN.
matching midsummers outfits.
quickie in the bathroom at midsummers.
if you were a pogue and made him bracelets he would wear them all so proudly.
i feel like if you were a pogue you would have a softer connection.
would for sure try to get along with your friends even though its really hard for him since he isn't too fond of them.
if you were a kook for sure the it couple. iconic.
this boy will do anything for you.
literally anything.
his first time being in love.
you assuring him when he gets insecure about ward loving sarah more.
him pushing you out of your comfort zone of things you've never tried. you always have fun.
literally there would be so much love in this relationship cause rafe has never experienced it.
showing you off.
making sure you feel loved.
making you feel like a princess.
pet names. (but not like cringey ones.)
for sure be into pushing you down the stairs . his number one kink. (@ my uss girlies already know, everyone else please know this is a joke.)
taglist: @ceruleanjj @bubblyanis @outerbanksobsessed @jayjaymaebank @copper-boom @void-sadie @tomzfrog @drewswannabegirl @calumbroutledge @thelocalpogue @baby-bearie @shawnssongs @pogue-style @emotionalbruv @softstarkey @ilovejjmaybank @thorsangel @write-from-the-heart @beautyandthebleh @fanficscuziranout @blondiee-seaveyy @callllumhood @obx-baby @myrandom-fandomlife @bellaguarneri @outrbank @tinylatina01 @flowersinvegas @sunwardsss @5sos-seavey @rudys-pankow @steverogers123 @simonsbluee (strikes means i could not tag you, add yourself to my taglist with the link in my bio)
181 notes · View notes
hlupdate · 5 years ago
Link
A hand­shake can quell polit­i­cal unrest and sti­fle impend­ing war. It can, with a bit of spit, val­i­date a gentleman’s agree­ment, end a years-long roman­tic rela­tion­ship or send a young heart rac­ing. But it all depends on the two par­ties involved.
Daisy, 21, felt a seis­mic jolt when Har­ry Styles, 25, wear­ing a striped jumper and rings on three of his five fin­gers, clutched her hand two days after this year’s Met Gala in New York, when she served him gela­to at the shop where she worked.
“He decid­ed on a small mint choco­late gela­to and I made his and the one for his friend and I said, ​‘Can I just say I absolute­ly loved your Met Gala look’ and he said ​‘Thank you very much! What’s your name?’ And I said, ​‘Daisy’ AND HE FUCK­ING EXTEND­ED HISHAND AND REACHED TO SHAKE MY HAND AND I ACTU­AL­LY FUCK­INGSHOOK HIS HAND WHAT THE FUCK,” she wrote on Insta­gram after The Shak­en­ing. ​“Like I didn’t even say any­thing to gas him up besides ​‘I loved your met gala look’ and his fine ass went and shook my hand! WHAT A BEAU­TI­FUL FUCK­ING HUMAN BEINGTHAT HE IS GOD BLESS HIM AND I HOPE HW [sic] LIVES FOREVER.”
For Har­ry Styles, a hand­shake can be a roman­tic ges­ture, con­jur­ing a potent rev­er­ence in its recip­i­ent, like the time he met Gucci’s cre­ative direc­tor Alessan­dro Michele. ​“He was as attrac­tive as James Dean and as per­sua­sive as Gre­ta Gar­bo. He was like a Luchi­no Vis­con­ti char­ac­ter, like an Apol­lo: at the same time sexy as a woman, as a kid, as a man,” Michele told me, has­ten­ing to add: ​“Of course, Har­ry is not aware of this.”
No, Styles has no idea the pow­er he wields. In per­son, he’s tow­er­ing, like some­one who is not that much taller but whose rep­u­ta­tion adds four inch­es. Styles has a seda­tive bari­tone, spo­ken in a rum­my north­ern Eng­lish accent, that tum­bles out so slow­ly you for­get the name of your first born, a swag­ger that has been nursed and per­fect­ed in myth­i­cal places with names like Pais­ley Park, or Abbey Road, or Grace­land. Makes com­plete sense that he would be up for the role of Elvis Pres­ley in Baz Luhrmann’s upcom­ing biopic. He was primed, nay, born to shake his hips, all but one but­ton on his shirt cling­ing for dear life around his tor­so. Then the part was award­ed to anoth­er actor, Austin Butler.
“[Elvis] was such an icon for me grow­ing up,” Styles tells me. ​“There was some­thing almost sacred about him, almost like I didn’t want to touch him. Then I end­ed up get­ting into [his life] a bit and I wasn’t dis­ap­point­ed,” he adds of his ini­tial research and prepa­ra­tions to play The King. He seems relaxed about los­ing the part to But­ler. ​“I feel like if I’m not the right per­son for the thing, then it’s best for both of us that I don’t do it, you know?”
Styles released his self-titled debut solo album in May 2017. The boy­band grad was clear­ly unin­ter­est­ed in hol­low­ing out the charts with more for­mu­la­ic meme pop. Instead, to the sur­prise of many, he dug his heels into retro-fetishist West Coast ​’70s rock. Some of the One Direc­tion fan-hordes might have been con­fused, but no mat­ter: Har­ry Styles sold one mil­lion copies.
Despite its com­mer­cial and crit­i­cal suc­cess, he didn’t tour the album right away. He want­ed to act in the Christo­pher Nolan film Dunkirk. To his cred­it, his por­tray­al of a British sol­dier cow­er­ing in a moored boat on the French beach­es as the Nazis advanced wasn’t skew­ered in the press like the movie debuts of, say, Madon­na or Justin Tim­ber­lake. Per­haps he was fol­low­ing advice giv­en by Elton John, who had urged him to diver­si­fy. ​“He was bril­liant in Dunkirk, which took a lot of peo­ple by sur­prise,” John writes in an email. ​“I love how he takes chances and risks.” Act­ing, unlike music, is a release for Styles; it’s the one time he can be not himself.
“Why do I want to act? It’s so dif­fer­ent to music for me,” he says, sud­den­ly ani­mat­ed. ​“They’re almost oppo­site for me. Music, you try and put so much of your­self into it; act­ing, you’re try­ing to total­ly dis­ap­pear in who­ev­er you’re being.”
Fol­low­ing the news that he missed out on Pres­ley, his name was float­ed for the role of Prince Eric in Disney’s live-action remake of The Lit­tle Mer­maid. How­ev­er, fans will have to wait a bit longer to see Styles on the big screen as that idea, too, has sunk. He won’t be The King or the Prince. ​“It was dis­cussed,” he acknow­ledges before swift­ly chang­ing the sub­ject. ​“I want to put music out and focus on that for a while. But every­one involved in it was amaz­ing, so I think it’s going to be great. I’ll enjoy watch­ing it, I’m sure.”
The new album is wrapped and the sin­gle is decid­ed upon. ​“It’s not like his last album,” his friend, rock ​‘n’ roll leg­end Ste­vie Nicks, told me recent­ly over the phone. ​“It’s not like any­thing One Direc­tion ever did. It’s pure Har­ry, as Har­ry would say. He’s made a very dif­fer­ent record and it’s spectacular.”
Beyond that, Styles is keep­ing his cards close to his chest as to his next musi­cal move. How­ev­er, the air is thick with rumours that his main wing­man for HS2 is Kid Har­poon, aka Tom Hull, who co-wrote debut album track Sweet Crea­ture. No less an author­i­ty than Liam Gal­lagher told us that both big band escapees were in the same stu­dio – RAK in north-west Lon­don – at the same time mak­ing their sec­ond solo albums. Styles played him a cou­ple of tracks, ​“and I tell you what, they’re good,” Gal­lagher enthused. ​“A bit like that Bon Iver. Is that his name?”
Har­ry Styles met Nicks at a Fleet­wood Mac con­cert in Los Ange­les in April 2015. Some­thing about him felt authen­tic to the leg­endary front­woman: ground­ed, like she’d known him for­ev­er, blessed with a win­ning moon­shot grin. A month lat­er, they met back­stage at anoth­er Mac gig, this time at the O2 in Lon­don. Styles brought a car­rot cake for Nicks’ birth­day, her name piped in icing on top. By her own admis­sion, Nicks doesn’t even cel­e­brate birth­days, so this was a sur­prise. ​“He was per­son­al­ly respon­si­ble for me actu­al­ly hav­ing to cel­e­brate my birth­day, which was very sweet,” she says.
Styles’ rela­tion­ship with Nicks is hard to define. Induct­ing her into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in New York as a solo artist ear­li­er this year, his speech hymned her as a ​“mag­i­cal gyp­sy god­moth­er who occu­pies the in-between”. She’s called him her ​“lovechild” with Mick Fleet­wood and the ​“son I nev­er had”. Both have moved past the pre­lim­i­nary chat acknowl­edg­ing each other’s unquan­tifi­able tal­ents and smooth­ly accel­er­at­ed towards play­ful cut-and-thrust ban­ter of a witch mom and her naughty child.
They per­form togeth­er – he sings The Chainand Stop Drag­gin’ My Heart Around; she sings the one alleged­ly writ­ten about Tay­lor Swift, Two Ghosts. One of those per­for­mances was at the Guc­ci Cruise after­par­ty in Rome in May, for ​“a lot of mon­ey”, Nicks tells me, in a ​“big kind of cas­tle place”. She has become his de fac­to men­tor – one phone call is all it takes to reach the Queen of Rock’n’Roll for advice on sequenc­ing (“She is real­ly good at track list­ing,” Styles admits) or just to hear each other’s voic­es… because, well, wouldn’t you?
Fol­low­ing anoth­er Fleet­wood Mac con­cert, at London’s Wem­b­ley Sta­di­um, in June, Nicks met Styles for a late (Indi­an) din­ner. He then invit­ed her back to his semi-detached Geor­gian man­sion in north Lon­don for a lis­ten­ing par­ty at mid­night. The album – HS2or what­ev­er it’ll be called – was fin­ished. Nicks, her assis­tant Karen, her make-up artist and her friends Jess and Mary crammed onto Styles’ liv­ing-room couch. They lis­tened to it once through in silence like a ​“bunch of edu­cat­ed monks or some­thing in this dark room”. Then once again, 15 or 16 tracks, this time each of his guests offer­ing live feed­back. It wrapped at 5am, just as the sun was bleed­ing through the curtains.
Even for a pop star of Styles’ stature, press­ing ​“play” on a deeply per­son­al work for your hero to digest, watch­ing her face react in real time to your new music, must be… what?
“It’s a dou­ble-edged thing,” he replies. ​“You’re always ner­vous when you are play­ing peo­ple music for the first time. You’ve heard it so much by this point, you for­get that peo­ple haven’t heard it before. It’s hard to not feel like you’ve done what you’ve set out to do. You are hap­py with some­thing and then some­one who you respect so much and look up to is, like: ​‘I real­ly like this.’ It feels like a large stamp [of approval]. It’s a big step towards feel­ing very com­fort­able with what­ev­er else hap­pens to it.”
Wad­ing through Styles’ back­ground info is exhaust­ing, since he was spanked by fame in the social media era where every god­dam blink of a kohl-rimmed eye has been doc­u­ment­ed from six angles. (And yes, he does some­times wear guyliner.)
Deep breath: born in Red­ditch, Worces­ter­shire, to par­ents Des and Anne, who divorced when he was sev­en. Grew up in Holmes Chapel in Cheshire with his sis­ter Gem­ma, mum and step­dad Robin Twist. Rode hors­es at a near­by sta­ble for free (“I was a bad rid­er, but I was a rid­er”). Stopped rid­ing, ​“got into dif­fer­ent stuff”. Formed a band, White Eski­mo, with school­mates. Aged 16, tried out for the 2010 run of The X Fac­torwith a stir­ring but aver­age ren­di­tion of Ste­vie Wonder’s Isn’t She Love­ly. Cut from the show and put into a boy band with four oth­ers, Louis Tom­lin­son, Liam Payne, Niall Horan and Zayn Malik, and called One Direc­tion. Became inter­na­tion­al­ly famous, toured the globe. Zayn quit to go solo. Toured some more. Dat­ed but maybe didn’t date Car­o­line Flack, Rita Ora and Tay­lor Swift – whom he report­ed­ly dumped in the British Vir­gin Islands. (This rela­tion­ship, if noth­ing else, yield­ed an icon­ic, can­did shot of Swift look­ing deject­ed, being motored back to shore on the back of a boat called the Fly­ing Ray.) One Direc­tion dis­cussed dis­band­ing in 2014, actu­al­ly dis­solved in 2015. They remain friend­ly, and Styles offi­cial­ly went solo in 2016.
It’s been two years since his epony­mous debut and lead sin­gle, Sign of the Times, shocked the world and Elton John with its swag­ger­ing, soft rock sound. ​“It came out of left field and I loved it,” John says.
After 89 are­na-packed shows across five con­ti­nents grossed him, the label, whomev­er, over $61 mil­lion, Styles had all but dis­ap­peared. He has emerged only inter­mit­tent­ly for pub­lic-fac­ing events – a Guc­ci after­par­ty per­for­mance here, a Met Gala co-chair­ing there. He relo­cat­ed from Los Ange­les back to Lon­don, sell­ing his Hol­ly­wood Hills house for $6mil­lion and ship­ping his Jaguar E-type across the Atlantic so he could take joyrides on the M25.
“I’m not over LA,” he insists when I ask about the move. ​“My rela­tion­ship with LAchanged a lot. What I want­ed from LA changed.”
A great escape, he would agree, is some­times nec­es­sary. He was in Tokyo for most of Jan­u­ary, hav­ing near­ly fin­ished his album. ​“I need­ed time to get out of that album frame-of-mind of: ​‘Is it fin­ished? Where am I at? What’s hap­pen­ing?’ I real­ly need­ed that time away from every­one. I was kind of just in Tokyo by myself.” His sab­bat­i­cal most­ly involved read­ing Haru­ki Murakami’s The Wind-Up Bird Chron­i­cle, singing Nir­vana at karaoke, writ­ing alone in his hotel room, lis­ten­ing to music and eaves­drop­ping on strangers in alien con­ver­sa­tion. ​“It was just a pos­i­tive time for my head and I think that impact­ed the album in a big way.”
Dur­ing this break he watched a lot of films, read a lot of books. Some­times he texts these rec­om­men­da­tions to his pal Michele at Guc­ci. He told Michele to watch the Ali Mac­graw film, Love Sto­ry. ​“We text what friends text about. He is the same [as me] in terms of he lives in his own world and he does his own thing. I love dress­ing up and he loves dress­ing up.”
Because he loves dress­ing up, Michele chose Styles to be the face of three Guc­ci Tai­lor­ing cam­paigns and of its new gen­der­less fra­grance, Mémoire d’une Odeur.
“The moment I met him, I imme­di­ate­ly under­stood there was some­thing strong around him,” Michele tells me. ​“I realised he was much more than a young singer. He was a young man, dressed in a thought­ful way, with uncombed hair and a beau­ti­ful voice. I thought he gath­ered with­in him­self the fem­i­nine and the masculine.”
Fash­ion, for Styles, is a play­ground. Some­thing he doesn’t take too seri­ous­ly. A cou­ple of years ago Har­ry Lam­bert, his styl­ist since 2015, acquired for him a pair of pink metal­lic Saint Lau­rent boots that he has nev­er been pho­tographed wear­ing. They are exceed­ing­ly rare – few pairs exist. Styles wears them ​“to get milk”. They are, in his words, ​“super-fun”. He’s not sure, but he has, ball­park, 50 pairs of shoes, as well as full clos­ets in at least three post­codes. He set­tles on an out­fit fair­ly quick­ly, maybe changes his T-shirt once before head­ing out, but most­ly knows what he likes.
What he may not ful­ly com­pre­hend is that sim­ply by being pho­tographed in a gar­ment he can spur the career of a design­er, as he has with Har­ris Reed, Palo­mo Spain, Charles Jef­frey, Alled-Martínez and a new favourite, Bode. Styles wore a SS16 Guc­ci flo­ral suit to the 2015 Amer­i­can Music Awards. When he was asked who made his suit on the red car­pet, Guc­ci began trend­ing world­wide on Twitter.
“It was one of the first times a male wore Alessandro’s run­way designs and, at the time, men were not tak­ing too many red car­pet risks,” says Lam­bert. ​“Who knows if it influ­enced oth­ers, but it was a spe­cial moment. Plus, it was fun see­ing the fans dress up in suits to come see Harry’s shows.”
Yet tra­di­tion­al gen­der codes of dress still have the minds of mid­dle Amer­i­ca in a choke­hold. Men can’t wear women’s clothes, say the online whingers, who have labelled him ​“trag­ic”, ​“a clown” and a Bowie wannabe. Styles doesn’t care. ​“What’s fem­i­nine and what’s mas­cu­line, what men are wear­ing and what women are wear­ing – it’s like there are no lines any more.”
Elton John agrees: ​“It worked for Marc Bolan, Bowie and Mick. Har­ry has the same qualities.”
Then there is the ques­tion of Styles’ sex­u­al­i­ty, some­thing he has admit­ted­ly ​“nev­er real­ly start­ed to label”, which will plague him until he does. Per­haps it’s part of his allure. He’s bran­dished a pride flag that read ​“Make Amer­i­ca Gay Again” on stage, and plant­ed a stake some­where left of cen­tre on sexuality’s rain­bow spectrum.
“In the posi­tion that he’s in, he can’t real­ly say a lot, but he chose a queer girl band to open for him and I think that speaks vol­umes,” Josette Maskin of the queer band MUNA told The Face ear­li­er this year.
“I get a lot of…” Styles trails off, wheels turn­ing on how he can dis­cuss sex­u­al­i­ty with­out real­ly answer­ing. ​“I’m not always super-out­spo­ken. But I think it’s very clear from choic­es that I make that I feel a cer­tain way about lots of things. I don’t know how to describe it. I guess I’m not…” He paus­es again, piv­ots. ​“I want every­one to feel wel­come at shows and online. They want to be loved and equal, you know? I’m nev­er unsup­port­ed, so it feels weird for me to over­think it for some­one else.”
Sex­u­al­i­ty aside, he must acknowl­edge that he has sex appeal. ​“The word ​‘sexy’ sounds so strange com­ing out of my mouth. So I would say that that’s prob­a­bly why I would not con­sid­er myself sexy.”
Har­ry Styles has emerged ful­ly-formed, an anachro­nis­tic rock star, vague in sen­si­bil­i­ty but des­tined to impress with a dis­arm­ing smile and a warm but firm handshake.
I recite to him a quote from Chrissie Hyn­de of The Pre­tenders about her time atop rock’s throne: ​“I nev­er got into this for the mon­ey or because I want­ed to join in the super­star sex around the swim­ming pools. I did it because the offer of a record con­tract came along and it seemed like it might be more fun than being a wait­ress. Now, I’m not so sure.”
Styles – who worked in a bak­ery in a small north­ern town some time before play­ing to 40,000 scream­ing fans in South Amer­i­can are­nas – must have wit­nessed some shit, been invit­ed to a few pool­side sex par­ties, in his time.
“I’ve seen a cou­ple of things,” he nods in agree­ment. ​“But I’m still young. I feel like there’s still stuff to see.”
37 notes · View notes
stylesnews · 5 years ago
Text
The Face - Volume 4 . Issue 1
A hand­shake can quell polit­i­cal unrest and sti­fle impend­ing war. It can, with a bit of spit, val­i­date a gentleman’s agree­ment, end a years-long roman­tic rela­tion­ship or send a young heart rac­ing. But it all depends on the two par­ties involved.
Daisy, 21, felt a seis­mic jolt when Har­ry Styles, 25, wear­ing a striped jumper and rings on three of his five fin­gers, clutched her hand two days after this year’s Met Gala in New York, when she served him gela­to at the shop where she worked.
“He decid­ed on a small mint choco­late gela­to and I made his and the one for his friend and I said, ​‘Can I just say I absolute­ly loved your Met Gala look’ and he said ​‘Thank you very much! What’s your name?’ And I said, ​‘Daisy’ AND HE FUCK­ING EXTEND­ED HIS HAND AND REACHEDTO SHAKE MY HAND AND I ACTU­AL­LY FUCK­ING SHOOK HIS HAND WHAT THEFUCK,” she wrote on Insta­gram after The Shak­en­ing. ​“Like I didn’t even say any­thing to gas him up besides ​‘I loved your met gala look’ and his fine ass went and shook my hand! WHATA BEAU­TI­FUL FUCK­ING HUMAN BEING THAT HE IS GOD BLESS HIM AND I HOPE HW[sic] LIVES FOREVER.”
For Har­ry Styles, a hand­shake can be a roman­tic ges­ture, con­jur­ing a potent rev­er­ence in its recip­i­ent, like the time he met Gucci’s cre­ative direc­tor Alessan­dro Michele. ​“He was as attrac­tive as James Dean and as per­sua­sive as Gre­ta Gar­bo. He was like a Luchi­no Vis­con­ti char­ac­ter, like an Apol­lo: at the same time sexy as a woman, as a kid, as a man,” Michele told me, has­ten­ing to add: ​“Of course, Har­ry is not aware of this.”
No, Styles has no idea the pow­er he wields. In per­son, he’s tow­er­ing, like some­one who is not that much taller but whose rep­u­ta­tion adds four inch­es. Styles has a seda­tive bari­tone, spo­ken in a rum­my north­ern Eng­lish accent, that tum­bles out so slow­ly you for­get the name of your first born, a swag­ger that has been nursed and per­fect­ed in myth­i­cal places with names like Pais­ley Park, or Abbey Road, or Grace­land. Makes com­plete sense that he would be up for the role of Elvis Pres­ley in Baz Luhrmann’s upcom­ing biopic. He was primed, nay, born to shake his hips, all but one but­ton on his shirt cling­ing for dear life around his tor­so. Then the part was award­ed to anoth­er actor, Austin Butler.
“[Elvis] was such an icon for me grow­ing up,” Styles tells me. ​“There was some­thing almost sacred about him, almost like I didn’t want to touch him. Then I end­ed up get­ting into [his life] a bit and I wasn’t dis­ap­point­ed,” he adds of his ini­tial research and prepa­ra­tions to play The King. He seems relaxed about los­ing the part to But­ler. ​“I feel like if I’m not the right per­son for the thing, then it’s best for both of us that I don’t do it, you know?”
Styles released his self-titled debut solo album in May 2017. The boy­band grad was clear­ly unin­ter­est­ed in hol­low­ing out the charts with more for­mu­la­ic meme pop. Instead, to the sur­prise of many, he dug his heels into retro-fetishist West Coast ​’70s rock. Some of the One Direc­tion fan-hordes might have been con­fused, but no mat­ter: Har­ry Styles sold one mil­lion copies.
Despite its com­mer­cial and crit­i­cal suc­cess, he didn’t tour the album right away. He want­ed to act in the Christo­pher Nolan film Dunkirk. To his cred­it, his por­tray­al of a British sol­dier cow­er­ing in a moored boat on the French beach­es as the Nazis advanced wasn’t skew­ered in the press like the movie debuts of, say, Madon­na or Justin Tim­ber­lake. Per­haps he was fol­low­ing advice giv­en by Elton John, who had urged him to diver­si­fy. ​“He was bril­liant in Dunkirk, which took a lot of peo­ple by sur­prise,” John writes in an email. ​“I love how he takes chances and risks.” Act­ing, unlike music, is a release for Styles; it’s the one time he can be not himself.
“Why do I want to act? It’s so dif­fer­ent to music for me,” he says, sud­den­ly ani­mat­ed. ​“They’re almost oppo­site for me. Music, you try and put so much of your­self into it; act­ing, you’re try­ing to total­ly dis­ap­pear in who­ev­er you’re being.”
Fol­low­ing the news that he missed out on Pres­ley, his name was float­ed for the role of Prince Eric in Disney’s live-action remake of The Lit­tle Mer­maid. How­ev­er, fans will have to wait a bit longer to see Styles on the big screen as that idea, too, has sunk. He won’t be The King or the Prince. ​“It was dis­cussed,” he acknow­ledges before swift­ly chang­ing the sub­ject. ​“I want to put music out and focus on that for a while. But every­one involved in it was amaz­ing, so I think it’s going to be great. I’ll enjoy watch­ing it, I’m sure.”
The new album is wrapped and the sin­gle is decid­ed upon. ​“It’s not like his last album,” his friend, rock ​‘n’ roll leg­end Ste­vie Nicks, told me recent­ly over the phone. ​“It’s not like any­thing One Direc­tion ever did. It’s pure Har­ry, as Har­ry would say. He’s made a very dif­fer­ent record and it’s spectacular.”
Beyond that, Styles is keep­ing his cards close to his chest as to his next musi­cal move. How­ev­er, the air is thick with rumours that his main wing­man for HS2 is Kid Har­poon, aka Tom Hull, who co-wrote debut album track Sweet Crea­ture. No less an author­i­ty than Liam Gal­lagher told us that both big band escapees were in the same stu­dio – RAK in north-west Lon­don – at the same time mak­ing their sec­ond solo albums. Styles played him a cou­ple of tracks, ​“and I tell you what, they’re good,” Gal­lagher enthused. ​“A bit like that Bon Iver. Is that his name?”
Har­ry Styles met Nicks at a Fleet­wood Mac con­cert in Los Ange­les in April 2015. Some­thing about him felt authen­tic to the leg­endary front­woman: ground­ed, like she’d known him for­ev­er, blessed with a win­ning moon­shot grin. A month lat­er, they met back­stage at anoth­er Mac gig, this time at the O2 in Lon­don. Styles brought a car­rot cake for Nicks’ birth­day, her name piped in icing on top. By her own admis­sion, Nicks doesn’t even cel­e­brate birth­days, so this was a sur­prise. ​“He was per­son­al­ly respon­si­ble for me actu­al­ly hav­ing to cel­e­brate my birth­day, which was very sweet,” she says.
Styles’ rela­tion­ship with Nicks is hard to define. Induct­ing her into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in New York as a solo artist ear­li­er this year, his speech hymned her as a ​“mag­i­cal gyp­sy god­moth­er who occu­pies the in-between”. She’s called him her ​“lovechild” with Mick Fleet­wood and the ​“son I nev­er had”. Both have moved past the pre­lim­i­nary chat acknowl­edg­ing each other’s unquan­tifi­able tal­ents and smooth­ly accel­er­at­ed towards play­ful cut-and-thrust ban­ter of a witch mom and her naughty child.
They per­form togeth­er – he sings The Chain and Stop Drag­gin’ My Heart Around; she sings the one alleged­ly writ­ten about Tay­lor Swift, Two Ghosts. One of those per­for­mances was at the Guc­ci Cruise after­par­ty in Rome in May, for ​“a lot of mon­ey”, Nicks tells me, in a ​“big kind of cas­tle place”. She has become his de fac­to men­tor – one phone call is all it takes to reach the Queen of Rock’n’Roll for advice on sequenc­ing (“She is real­ly good at track list­ing,” Styles admits) or just to hear each other’s voic­es… because, well, wouldn’t you?
Fol­low­ing anoth­er Fleet­wood Mac con­cert, at London’s Wem­b­ley Sta­di­um, in June, Nicks met Styles for a late (Indi­an) din­ner. He then invit­ed her back to his semi-detached Geor­gian man­sion in north Lon­don for a lis­ten­ing par­ty at mid­night. The album – HS2or what­ev­er it’ll be called – was fin­ished. Nicks, her assis­tant Karen, her make-up artist and her friends Jess and Mary crammed onto Styles’ liv­ing-room couch. They lis­tened to it once through in silence like a ​“bunch of edu­cat­ed monks or some­thing in this dark room”. Then once again, 15 or 16 tracks, this time each of his guests offer­ing live feed­back. It wrapped at 5am, just as the sun was bleed­ing through the curtains.
Even for a pop star of Styles’ stature, press­ing ​“play” on a deeply per­son­al work for your hero to digest, watch­ing her face react in real time to your new music, must be… what?
“It’s a dou­ble-edged thing,” he replies. ​“You’re always ner­vous when you are play­ing peo­ple music for the first time. You’ve heard it so much by this point, you for­get that peo­ple haven’t heard it before. It’s hard to not feel like you’ve done what you’ve set out to do. You are hap­py with some­thing and then some­one who you respect so much and look up to is, like: ​‘I real­ly like this.’ It feels like a large stamp [of approval]. It’s a big step towards feel­ing very com­fort­able with what­ev­er else hap­pens to it.”
Wad­ing through Styles’ back­ground info is exhaust­ing, since he was spanked by fame in the social media era where every god­dam blink of a kohl-rimmed eye has been doc­u­ment­ed from six angles. (And yes, he does some­times wear guyliner.)
Deep breath: born in Red­ditch, Worces­ter­shire, to par­ents Des and Anne, who divorced when he was sev­en. Grew up in Holmes Chapel in Cheshire with his sis­ter Gem­ma, mum and step­dad Robin Twist. Rode hors­es at a near­by sta­ble for free (“I was a bad rid­er, but I was a rid­er”). Stopped rid­ing, ​“got into dif­fer­ent stuff”. Formed a band, White Eski­mo, with school­mates. Aged 16, tried out for the 2010 run of The X Fac­torwith a stir­ring but aver­age ren­di­tion of Ste­vie Wonder’s Isn’t She Love­ly. Cut from the show and put into a boy band with four oth­ers, Louis Tom­lin­son, Liam Payne, Niall Horan and Zayn Malik, and called One Direc­tion. Became inter­na­tion­al­ly famous, toured the globe. Zayn quit to go solo. Toured some more. Dat­ed but maybe didn’t date Car­o­line Flack, Rita Ora and Tay­lor Swift – whom he report­ed­ly dumped in the British Vir­gin Islands. (This rela­tion­ship, if noth­ing else, yield­ed an icon­ic, can­did shot of Swift look­ing deject­ed, being motored back to shore on the back of a boat called the Fly­ing Ray.) One Direc­tion dis­cussed dis­band­ing in 2014, actu­al­ly dis­solved in 2015. They remain friend­ly, and Styles offi­cial­ly went solo in 2016.
It’s been two years since his epony­mous debut and lead sin­gle, Sign of the Times, shocked the world and Elton John with its swag­ger­ing, soft rock sound. ​“It came out of left field and I loved it,” John says.
After 89 are­na-packed shows across five con­ti­nents grossed him, the label, whomev­er, over $61mil­lion, Styles had all but dis­ap­peared. He has emerged only inter­mit­tent­ly for pub­lic-fac­ing events – a Guc­ci after­par­ty per­for­mance here, a Met Gala co-chair­ing there. He relo­cat­ed from Los Ange­les back to Lon­don, sell­ing his Hol­ly­wood Hills house for $6 mil­lion and ship­ping his Jaguar E-type across the Atlantic so he could take joyrides on the M25.
“I’m not over LA,” he insists when I ask about the move. ​“My rela­tion­ship with LA changed a lot. What I want­ed from LA changed.”
A great escape, he would agree, is some­times nec­es­sary. He was in Tokyo for most of Jan­u­ary, hav­ing near­ly fin­ished his album. ​“I need­ed time to get out of that album frame-of-mind of: ​‘Is it fin­ished? Where am I at? What’s hap­pen­ing?’ I real­ly need­ed that time away from every­one. I was kind of just in Tokyo by myself.” His sab­bat­i­cal most­ly involved read­ing Haru­ki Murakami’s The Wind-Up Bird Chron­i­cle, singing Nir­vana at karaoke, writ­ing alone in his hotel room, lis­ten­ing to music and eaves­drop­ping on strangers in alien con­ver­sa­tion. ​“It was just a pos­i­tive time for my head and I think that impact­ed the album in a big way.”
Dur­ing this break he watched a lot of films, read a lot of books. Some­times he texts these rec­om­men­da­tions to his pal Michele at Guc­ci. He told Michele to watch the Ali Mac­graw film, Love Sto­ry. ​“We text what friends text about. He is the same [as me] in terms of he lives in his own world and he does his own thing. I love dress­ing up and he loves dress­ing up.”
Because he loves dress­ing up, Michele chose Styles to be the face of three Guc­ci Tai­lor­ing cam­paigns and of its new gen­der­less fra­grance, Mémoire d’une Odeur.
“The moment I met him, I imme­di­ate­ly under­stood there was some­thing strong around him,” Michele tells me. ​“I realised he was much more than a young singer. He was a young man, dressed in a thought­ful way, with uncombed hair and a beau­ti­ful voice. I thought he gath­ered with­in him­self the fem­i­nine and the masculine.”
Fash­ion, for Styles, is a play­ground. Some­thing he doesn’t take too seri­ous­ly. A cou­ple of years ago Har­ry Lam­bert, his styl­ist since 2015, acquired for him a pair of pink metal­lic Saint Lau­rent boots that he has nev­er been pho­tographed wear­ing. They are exceed­ing­ly rare – few pairs exist. Styles wears them ​“to get milk”. They are, in his words, ​“super-fun”. He’s not sure, but he has, ball­park, 50 pairs of shoes, as well as full clos­ets in at least three post­codes. He set­tles on an out­fit fair­ly quick­ly, maybe changes his T-shirt once before head­ing out, but most­ly knows what he likes.
What he may not ful­ly com­pre­hend is that sim­ply by being pho­tographed in a gar­ment he can spur the career of a design­er, as he has with Har­ris Reed, Palo­mo Spain, Charles Jef­frey, Alled-Martínez and a new favourite, Bode. Styles wore a SS16 Guc­ci flo­ral suit to the 2015 Amer­i­can Music Awards. When he was asked who made his suit on the red car­pet, Guc­ci began trend­ing world­wide on Twitter.
“It was one of the first times a male wore Alessandro’s run­way designs and, at the time, men were not tak­ing too many red car­pet risks,” says Lam­bert. ​“Who knows if it influ­enced oth­ers, but it was a spe­cial moment. Plus, it was fun see­ing the fans dress up in suits to come see Harry’s shows.”
Yet tra­di­tion­al gen­der codes of dress still have the minds of mid­dle Amer­i­ca in a choke­hold. Men can’t wear women’s clothes, say the online whingers, who have labelled him ​“trag­ic”, ​“a clown” and a Bowie wannabe. Styles doesn’t care. ​“What’s fem­i­nine and what’s mas­cu­line, what men are wear­ing and what women are wear­ing – it’s like there are no lines any more.”
Elton John agrees: ​“It worked for Marc Bolan, Bowie and Mick. Har­ry has the same qualities.”
Then there is the ques­tion of Styles’ sex­u­al­i­ty, some­thing he has admit­ted­ly ​“nev­er real­ly start­ed to label”, which will plague him until he does. Per­haps it’s part of his allure. He’s bran­dished a pride flag that read ​“Make Amer­i­ca Gay Again” on stage, and plant­ed a stake some­where left of cen­tre on sexuality’s rain­bow spectrum.
“In the posi­tion that he’s in, he can’t real­ly say a lot, but he chose a queer girl band to open for him and I think that speaks vol­umes,” Josette Maskin of the queer band MUNA told The Face ear­li­er this year.
“I get a lot of…” Styles trails off, wheels turn­ing on how he can dis­cuss sex­u­al­i­ty with­out real­ly answer­ing. ​“I’m not always super-out­spo­ken. But I think it’s very clear from choic­es that I make that I feel a cer­tain way about lots of things. I don’t know how to describe it. I guess I’m not…” He paus­es again, piv­ots. ​“I want every­one to feel wel­come at shows and online. They want to be loved and equal, you know? I’m nev­er unsup­port­ed, so it feels weird for me to over­think it for some­one else.”
Sex­u­al­i­ty aside, he must acknowl­edge that he has sex appeal. ​“The word ​‘sexy’ sounds so strange com­ing out of my mouth. So I would say that that’s prob­a­bly why I would not con­sid­er myself sexy.”
Har­ry Styles has emerged ful­ly-formed, an anachro­nis­tic rock star, vague in sen­si­bil­i­ty but des­tined to impress with a dis­arm­ing smile and a warm but firm handshake.
I recite to him a quote from Chrissie Hyn­de of The Pre­tenders about her time atop rock’s throne: ​“I nev­er got into this for the mon­ey or because I want­ed to join in the super­star sex around the swim­ming pools. I did it because the offer of a record con­tract came along and it seemed like it might be more fun than being a wait­ress. Now, I’m not so sure.”
Styles – who worked in a bak­ery in a small north­ern town some time before play­ing to 40,000scream­ing fans in South Amer­i­can are­nas – must have wit­nessed some shit, been invit­ed to a few pool­side sex par­ties, in his time.
“I’ve seen a cou­ple of things,” he nods in agree­ment. ​“But I’m still young. I feel like there’s still stuff to see.”
36 notes · View notes
dipulb3 · 4 years ago
Text
The 2021 Mercedes-AMG G63's new all-terrain option makes a big difference
New Post has been published on https://appradab.com/the-2021-mercedes-amg-g63s-new-all-terrain-option-makes-a-big-difference/
The 2021 Mercedes-AMG G63's new all-terrain option makes a big difference
These wheels and tires are unique to the AMG Trail Package.
Michael Shaffer/Mercedes-Benz
The Mercedes-Benz G-Class has end-of-the-world, Schöckl-scaling off-road capability, but that’s not why most people buy ’em. In the US, the G63 outsells the base G550, and not by a small margin. On top of that, I can pretty much guarantee all the AMGs you see running around have 22-inch wheels and rubber bands for tires. It’s why I’ve always said the G550 is actually the better buy for folks who might want to get a little dirty. But thanks to a new option pack for the 2021 AMG G63, that’s not really the case anymore.
Like
Unmatched off-road ability
Strong V8 power
Comfortable ride quality
Iconic style
Don’t Like
Older multimedia tech
Lousy fuel economy
High cost of entry
For $3,050, you can spec your 2021 Mercedes-AMG G63 with the AMG Trail Package. This adds a recalibrated off-road setting to the G63’s driving modes, with softer damping for a slightly more deft approach to off-roading. This pack also adds a black underbody brush guard, all-season floor mats, rear mud flaps and matte black 20-inch wheels with — and this is the important bit — all-terrain tires. Capability aside, the Trail Package is a really cool look. And paired with new paint colors like this test car’s G Manufaktur Arabian Grey, I’m 100% here for AMG’s butch updo.
The all-terrain tires in question are deliciously meaty 275/50 Pirelli Scorpion ATRs. Their tall sidewalls and aggressive tread pattern are far better than those on any all-season tire, especially when the going gets tough. Those deep treads can better expel dirt and mud, and when aired down, they provide excellent traction and control in deep sand. Look, I’m not going to try and tell you the G63 isn’t a stellar off-roader in its stock spec, but great suspension geometry, locking axles and a big V8 mean bupkis if the contact patches — the points where your car actually touches the ground — are weak.
2021 Mercedes-AMG G63 can climb a mountain on the way to the mall
See all photos
Let’s not forget the heart and soul of the G63: AMG’s 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8. This engine produces 577 horsepower and 627 pound-feet of torque, sent to all four wheels through a nine-speed automatic transmission. This not only rockets the G63 to 60 mph in a scant 4.4 seconds, it means there’s a huge reserve of low-end power available at all times. I’ll admit, even with the sophisticated suspension and appropriate tires, a lot of hairy off-roading situations can be remedied by following the trusty “when in doubt, power out” theory.
But even if you never take the G63 off-road, the Trail Package pays dividends in daily life, too. These softer tires make for a more comfortable highway ride, and while the tradeoff here is reduced lateral traction at speed, let’s be honest, you aren’t doing any hot cornering in a freaking G63. The tire change shouldn’t affect your fuel economy, either; expect to see the same dismal 13 miles per gallon city, 16 mpg highway and 14 mpg combined as before. Then again, what else would you expect from a 577-hp SUV that’s about as aerodynamic as a barn?
The G63’s basic chassis and steering calibrations don’t change if you select the AMG Trail Package, so all of those good — well, unique — attributes carry over, as well. Plus, every G63 comes standard with Mercedes’ full suite of driver-assistance features, including full-speed adaptive cruise control, blind-spot assist and lane-keeping assist. The G63 also comes with a 360-degree camera, which is super helpful when negotiating tight situations, off-road or otherwise.
The G-Class still uses Mercedes’ older COMAND infotainment.
Michael Shaffer/Mercedes-Benz
Beyond driving aids, the G63 gets all of the G-Class’ best cabin tech, with one major caveat. There’s a 12.3-inch reconfigurable gauge cluster and a 12.3-inch central infotainment screen, but this runs the older COMAND setup, not Mercedes’ excellent new MBUX interface. That means there’s no touchscreen, no augmented reality navigation overlays and no friendly “Hey, Mercedes” voice to tell you a joke when you’re having a poopy day. At least COMAND has Apple CarPlay and Android Auto bundled in, as well as a number of Mercedes-Benz connected services. A Burmester sound system is standard, too.
The G63’s interior is just so damn nice, with optional Nappa leather surfaces, real metal accents and excellent attention to detail. There’s headroom for days, even if shoulder room is on the narrow side, and the G63 has plenty of no-additional-cost amenities, like heated front and rear seats, multicolor ambient lighting, a sunroof and more. The back seats are tight-ish, but at least there’s real legroom in this generation G-Class, and the heavy, side-hinged rear door opens to reveal a huge cargo hold — though most of the usable space is vertical. Go buy some tall plants, but put a tarp down so you don’t mess up the carpet.
Arabian Grey is a $6,500 paint option.
Michael Shaffer/Mercedes-Benz
You’ll need at least $157,500 to get into a 2021 Mercedes-AMG G63, including $1,050 for destination. Throw in the $3,050 AMG Trail Package — along with my test car’s AMG Night Package ($1,950), Comfort Seat Package ($2,220), carbon-fiber trim ($3,700), Arabian Grey paint ($6,500) and a few other odds and ends — and you’ll get to the $176,370 as-tested price of the G63 pictured here. There’s a whole wide world of color and trim options available for the G63, too, so by all means, go nuts.
I’d be remiss not to mention that the $132,800 G550 will check 95% of the same boxes for a lot less money, though the Trail Package is only available on the G63. (Nothing a tire shop can’t partially remedy, though.) Then again, given the G’s sales stats, the 550/AMG disparity clearly doesn’t matter. And now that the Trail Package amplifies the G63’s off-road cred to G550-surpassing levels, the hilariously powerful AMG is even harder to argue against. Live it up, big spender.
0 notes
powerhh · 7 years ago
Note
Might I ask why there is no reposting of your art? I mean, isn't it good exposer?
yes! you’re very welcome to ask that!
alright so, my pal, friend, buddy. this is what’s up. don’t see this as a rant specifically for you, because w the way you wrote this ask i can only assume that you are genuinely curious and want to know, and you mean no harm, which is why im going to write a long ass rant to let all my followers know how i personally feel about people reposting my art and why i don’t want people to do it:
you may think reposting art could be considered flattering, and i mean, sure, someone liking my art enough to want to share it with others means literally the whole world to me, but if you want to support me and my art because you like it, you’d do it through reblogs and likes. 
if you want to support me or any artists posting their art online, don’t repost the art. please reblog and like it so the creator gets the cred.  
why not share the art through a repost, you ask? well, reposting my art means that My Original Post with the thing maybe won’t get as many notes as it may have gotten, because there suddenly would be another source to find and like it on. that means that fewer people will find my blog. sure, credits redirects people to my page but credits can easily be removed somewhere along the way, and many people kind of just don’t care about reading the descriptions. the reposter would, in fact, also get recognition and notes from my work. i work hours and hours on my art, and someone else getting notes because of my art even though it’s credited would kind of suck if i’m to be honest. basically, my art would get the exposure, but not the artist that made it, which,, well,, sucks for someone who’s not a famous artist with art that literally everyone recognizes.
the artist also won’t See the feedback on the art in the same way if it’s reposted. i personally check through all the reblogs i get and go through the tags that people sometimes add. every like and every reblog bring me so much joy and new motivation to make more content!! i love to draw and i love making content, but seeing someone else liking my content? that’s the Best feeling. i won’t see the likes or reblogs on a reposted post, so even though people may find my blog, the appreciation won’t reach the artist in the same way. 
it’s also a matter of some kind of control. it’s about wanting to keep track of where my art is. i know i only post most of my stuff on tumblr, and then some things on instagram and twitter, and of course my patreon. i mean. i know it’s the internet, i know there’s a risk that people will repost my art without my consent whether i like it or not. but! if you respect the artist and their work and they ask people to not repost, it would be pretty cool to respect that. 
it’s technically not illegal to post repost art without any kind of alteration and with credit, but!!!!!! if the original creator ask people to not repost it, it would be kind of a dick move to still do it.
i’m assuming that i don’t have to go into reposting my art without credit or editing in any kind of way and then posting, because that’s like, straight up theft. like, the kind of theft that’s literally illegal. 
you are actually fully welcome to still write to me and ask if you’re allowed to use my art or repost it to a specific site or for a specific purpose (i’ll most probably ask for a clarification of what exactly you want to use my art for), but please be aware that i’ll most probably say no to a regular repost because i generally do not want people to repost my art. and if i say no, please respect that. 
i am however cool with people using my art as their icon and background and things like that but please credit me.
anyway, if you managed to read through my lil rant, thank you for reading. thank you for your support and thank you for respecting artists. 
10 notes · View notes
hvitserkk · 7 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Start to Finish GIF Tutorial
You’ll need:
Photoshop (CS6 for timeline, but animation info included) KMPlayer This .psd+tutorial and sharpening action
Once you have your video, show, movie, etc downloaded, go ahead and open it in the KMPlayer and skip to the part you want to gif.
Then and press ctrl+G to open the "Capture Frames" window, and set it up like this:
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Then press "Start" and play the scene you want to GIF. When the scene is done, press "Stop". Now you have your frames.
The easiest way to organize the frames for a set is to make folders 1-10 and separate the frames into the gifs you want. So I have 483 frames, but I know I want a four gif set, so I just move each scene into a folder.
Tumblr media
99% of the time I stay under 90 frames per gif and at least 35 per gif. I also try not to have changing scenes in the same gif, (like when the camera shows something different) unless the gif is under 35 frames.
Now to Photoshop, I use the timeline to load frames, but you can do it one of two ways. Way one, like me, the timeline.
Go to Window > Timeline, then click on the video thumbnail icon, then "add media" and it will open the Open” window, just go to your first folder and select all the frames and press "Open".
Tumblr media
Then all your frames will be loaded into a stack:
Tumblr media
To use the frame animation, go to File > Scripts > Load Files Into Stack and do the same thing, go to your folder, select all your frames and press "Open" and it will load all your frames too.
Tumblr media
For sizing, I always use 245px for the width, I don't know the new size, and don't care to know. The heights vary, for a ten gif set, I usually use 145-155px, for an eight gif set I usually use 145-160px, for a six gif set I use 145-225px and for a four or two gif set I use 145-300px. I also only use web-dl videos, so I don't ever have to really crop logos out.
To do so, on a frame animation, go to Image > Image Size and change the dimensions. Make sure you stick to 245px as the width. We'll change the canvas size next, so make sure either the height or width is the size you want, but the width is at least 245px:
Tumblr media
If you're using the timeline, make sure to ungroup the "Video Group" that your frames are in, and regroup them into a normal group. Then do the same thing as the frame animation step above.
Tumblr media
Now go to Edit > Canvas Size and change the dimensions to 245Xyour height and press "OK". You can move all the frames to fit the canvas if needed.
Tumblr media
Do the same for all your gifs. Here are my four gifs:
Tumblr media
Now to sharpen them I use the action listed above. Just drag and drop it into Photoshop, then go to Window > Actions to open it. Press play on "Glossy Sharpen" and there you go.
Then I follow my other tutorial (the psd mentioned above) to edit all the colors. Here are my gifs now:
Tumblr media
Once that's done, if you're using the timeline, flatten the frames into layers:
Tumblr media
Then re-group all the layers, and convert into animation:
Tumblr media
Then, change your animation settings. I always use 0.05 for gifs with 40+ frames, any less I use 0.06:
Tumblr media
And then you can save the gifs with one of these settings to get the smoothest gif playback (cred to rubyredwisp and itsthatunique):
Tumblr media
and that's it! Feel free to shoot me an ask if you need further help! 
329 notes · View notes
gothify1 · 5 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
And last-minute shopping gives me anxiety.As anyone who heard a Christmas carol pre-Halloween knows, our culture gears up for the holidays very prematurely. Holiday party invites are sent out in October (true story), and November is studded with just as many festive save-the-dates as December and January, which results in a major conundrum in terms of beauty shopping. Since we know there will be major deals and steals on Black Friday, Cyber Monday, and whatever other weekday shopping extravaganza is invented this year, part of us feels the need to resist all beauty buying urges until we have a million discount codes saved and ready to go to battle. On the other hand, we want to feel and look our best for every event, party, and photo op occupying our calendars before said sales. Despite the fact that I'm an editor who lives and breathes everything beauty for a living, there are still products I buy with my own money or have tacked to my beauty product wish list, and just ahead, I'm revealing what they are. From the glow-inducing self-tanner I've been restocking since college to the mists and moisturizers my favorite celebrity makeup artists use on their A-list clients, I'm sharing the 21 beauty products I absolutely can't wait to purchase (and which I'll be securing into my product arsenal before the holiday shopping frenzy ignites). Keep scrolling! As a rule, I try to be as minimal as possible when it comes to the products I use in my hair (bleached strands and all), but come November and December—the season of holiday parties and work events—I'm doing the most damage to my poor head. This ingenious filter-like spray goes on before you shampoo and literally lifts and carries away residue, minerals, and other annoying debris getting in the way of your best hair day. To elaborate on my point above, winter is when I'm hardest on my hair, and my thirsty strands crave a weekly masking ritual more than I crave a hefty pour of wine at Thanksgiving. This epic formula is a best seller, smells heavenly, and practically transforms decrepit strands after just one go. Magic. This pre-shampoo oil from French brand Leonor Greyl is an icon. Slather it over parched, damaged strands before you shampoo, and straw-like texture magically morphs into liquid gold. Seriously, the Brothers Grimm should have written it into Rumpelstiltskin—no spinning wheels necessary. If you have limited space alotted for haircare on your vanity or in your suitcase, I suggest this all-in-one saving grace from R+Co. It works its superpowers on all hair types and just has to be sprayed on clean, damp hair before being combed through. Hair is left moisturized, detangled, and fortified with an extra kick of strength and resilience that will definitely come in handy all season long. I'm always dreaming of denser, fuller hair. After discovering my favorite hair gummies had too much biotin (and was causing me to break out), I'm on the lookout for something topical instead. Viviscal always receives rave reviews, and it's one of the few methods celeb hairstylists also seem to back in terms of healthier, expedited hair growth. This hairstylist staple has been on my holiday wish list for years—way before I was a beauty editor. It's truly the Rolls-Royce of hairbrushes, and with all of the parties and events I have on the calendar through the end of the year, I think I finally need to splurge. It's expensive, but I'll do almost anything in the name of perennially pretty hair. It's official. According to every celebrity hairstylist I've talked to in the past year, hot rollers are the coolest new way to gift hair with lots of volume and the perfect ratio of bend and wave. T3 makes some of the best hot tools money can buy, so I'm throwing my money at this eight-count set at rapid speed. If I could only use one powder highlighter for the rest of my life, it would be Becca's cult-favorite in Champagne Pop. Obviously, I need this collector's edition ASAP and in time for all of the inevitable holiday photo ops. This French complexion-brightening CC-serum hybrid is how I plan on convincing people I'm actually getting an adequate amount of beauty sleep this season. The results are so pretty it's beyond. Plus, it can be applied on its own or mixed with your other favorite liquid formulas like foundation. A little will go a long way, so trust me when I say it's worth the investment. A makeup artist used this multitasking product from Kevyn Aucoin on me ages ago, and I've been pining for it ever since. Plus, it's tiny in size and perfect for packing and throwing in your bag wherever adventures take you this winter. Use it as a spot foundation, concealer, allover foundation, highlighter (if you choose a shade or two lighter than your natural skin tone), or mixed with your fave face cream to do double duty as tinted moisturizer alternative. Brilliant. Thanks to jojoba and honey, it's also super hydrating and acts like a healing salve for dry, chapped skin. I'm already obsessed with Tarte's bronzers and blushes, so this set of three blush, bronzer, and highlighter shades all stacked together is practically a dream come true. Some people dream of pumpkin pie and spiked eggnog this time of year, but I dream of sparkling eye looks, and these tubes that are the prettiest thing to adorn your eyes with for a subtle hint of shimmer. Diamond Dust and Kitten Karma are in my cart. My favorite SPF-spiked moisturizer has officially bottomed out, and I'm in need of a no-funny-business replacement. This formula from Supergoop! is touted as one of the best among beauty-industry insiders and works triple duty as a moisturizer, primer, and, of course, sunscreen (which you should still be wearing, folks!). I'm more of a powder-bronzer kind of gal, but I'll make an exception for this fan favorite from RMS Beauty, which has all kinds of amazing winter-skin perks like buriti oil to add even more street cred to its sun-kissed and prismatic finish. Use it as a bronzer, a highlighter, an eye shadow—the options are endless. Celebrity makeup artist Pati Dubroff uses this amazing sheet mask to prep her clients (um, Margot Robbie, for one) pre-makeup. Do I need to explain why I want this so badly? With these prettily packaged eye masks from Wander Beauty in hand (or suitcase), not getting enough sleep officially becomes no problem. 'Tis the season for the best Swiss-made body butter for parched, winter-dry skin. This luxurious formula will be my nightly ritual all season long. Susanne Kaufmann's luscious skin and bath essentials gift you with the easiest, self-care-centric way to moisturize and soften your skin. I'm dreaming of dipping into this Mallow Blossom Bubble Bath for a major de-stress moment. I don't have any actual sun-soaked vacation plans, but this game-changing and customizable express formula from St. Tropez helps lessen the blow while boosting overall skin glow. It's my absolute favorite, and I'm forever restocking it. Literally every skincare product Darphin makes is on my want list, but after seeing Swedish pop singer Zara Larsson gush about this soothing toner (heaven-sent for my sensitive winter skin), this formula is taking top priority within my lineup. (FYI: It has a perfect five-star rating.) I've heard multiple makeup artists sing this cream's praises. Described by the brand as "a gentle protective moisturizing day cream for sensitive, dry or weather-damaged skin," this is the perfect wintertime-skin antidote.  Up next: 24 French Beauty Buys With Seriously Amazing Ratings
0 notes
thereallygoodblogshow · 5 years ago
Text
MA Fashion and Textile Practices Major Project Path - 5th August
I feel it has been quite some time since I put anything down in this blog, and looking at the date of my last entry it has been some time! A lot has happened since my last entry, I created my practice pieces and put together my verbal presentation for our individual MA Practice Presentations. Here I thought I would document this process prior to continuing my ongoing research, as this I feel will add weight and significance to the research going forward. 
I had finally got all the equipment and materials I thought I would need to start making my practice pieces, and as I discussed at the end of my last entry I thought the best way for me to start my practice pieces was to create a design map for each of the T-shirts I planned to make. I initially thought that I wanted to create a zero waste T-shirt as discussed previously, but thought that the space I would need to fill would be too big on each piece within the time frame I had. I still plan to create a zero waste T-shirt to see how it would look and as I believe any waste within the manufacture of fashion needs to be addressed. The use of organic cotton or other sustainable fabrics was also discussed, but at this particular time I did not have the financial ability to purchase a higher priced jersey. Part of this research will look at sustainability and waste within the fashion industry and why the higher cost of these materials may be a factor in why many manufacturers are currently using cheaper, less sustainable alternatives.
In this instance Vivienne Westwood’s Climate Change T-shirt was my inspiration for my practice pieces as it looked easy to make (I am not a great sewer) and would act as a good ‘billboard’ to work on. It’s square cut shape, raw edges and exposed seams reflects a hand-made aesthetic - how a protest placard or self -made billboard could look.  
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Westwood, V. (n.d). Vivienne Westwood Climate Revolution T-shirt. [Photograph]. Retrieved from https://www.viviennewestwood.com/en/women/clothing/t-shirts/square-t-shirt-climate-revolution-white-nat-white-CLA305AW550168.html?cgid=women-clothing-tshirts#page=1&start=1.
Vivienne Westwood’s Climate Revolution T-shirt strives to illustrate the vital ongoing campaign against climate change. The front of the T-shirt shows a map of the world, the red areas indicate where the planet would become inhabitable if estimated future temperature rises are correct. The revolution refers to the fact that most people accept that climate change is the result of a man-made interjection and that we are all responsible for safeguarding our future.   
The first T-shirt design I mapped out was based on a Protest T-Shirt but using relevant song lyrics as I had discussed previously. Finding appropriate lyrics was surprisingly easy, it was honing down the selection that was hard as there were so many song lyrics I could choose that said what I wanted to say.
Tumblr media
Here is the design for the Protest T-shirt using the song lyrics I found. In my previous blog entry I discussed the reasons why I chose Green Day’s lyrics ‘Where have all the riots gone’ from their song Letterbomb and the lyrics ‘Despite all my rage/I’m still just a rat in a cage’ from Smashing Pumpkins song Bullet with Butterfly Wings. I thought now would be an appropriate time to discuss what songs struck a chord with me (no pun intended!) and why I chose their lyrics to use.
youtube
Manic Street Preachers [Manic Street Preachers]. (2009, Oct 25). If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next (Official Video) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX8szNPgrEs
Manic Street Preachers  - If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next is one of my favourite 90′s songs. As a protest song it has stood the test of time. Released in 1998 its lyrics now are ever more poignant 21 years later. The song was partly Inspired by Welsh volunteers joining the left-wing International Brigades fighting against Francisco Franco’s fascist rebels in the Spanish Civil war. A graphic Republican propaganda poster displaying an image of a dead child killed by Spanish Nationalists was released between 1936-39 and bears the words: ‘MADRID. THE 'MILITARY' PRACTICE OF THE REBELS. IF YOU TOLERATE THIS YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE NEXT.’ - became inspiration for the Manic’s song title.      
Tumblr media
Imperial War Museum, n.d. (1936-1939). MADRID. THE 'MILITARY' PRACTICE OF THE REBELS. IF YOU TOLERATE THIS YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE NEXT.. [Poster]. Retrieved from https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/1122.
As with many Manic Street Preacher songs, they draw inspiration from many sources. Another lyric in the song - ‘If I can shoot rabbits/then I can shoot fascists' is said to have been a quote by a Welsh man to his brother when he had joined the Republican fighters. The lyric  - ‘ I've walked Las Ramblas/but not with real intent' was from the book ‘Homage to Catalonia’ by George Orwell in regards to the fighting which took place there. Being very much an anti-fascist song it was ironic that in 2013 the English Defence League took it upon themselves to use the song to promote their rally in Birmingham. Clearly not taking the time the listen to the song, the band were said to be horrified as its misuse and threatened to take legal action. The similar action happened back in 2009 when the British National Party tried to interpret the lyrics to suit their own means saying that people could interpret lyrics in different ways, that really beggars belief! 
Websites:
Trendell, A. (2018). Manic Street Preachers look back on ‘If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next’ on its 20th anniversary. Retrieved from https://www.nme.com/news/music/manic-street-preachers-if-you-tolerate-this-your-children-will-be-next-lyrics-meaning-video-song-stories-interview-2370143.
Factmag. (2013). Manic Street Preachers take on English Defence League over use of ‘If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next’. Retrieved from https://www.factmag.com/2013/07/12/manic-street-preachers-take-on-english-defence-league-over-use-of-if-you-tolerate-this-your-children-will-be-next/.
Wikipedia. (n.d). If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_You_Tolerate_This_Your_Children_Will_Be_Next.
Whilst watching the Handmaid’s Tale  - a TV series based on the best selling novel by Margaret Atwood, which tells the tale of a totalitarian society called Gilead where women are treated as property of the state and are forced into sexual servitude in an attempt to recover an underpopulated and devastated world - a song played over the end titles caught my attention. It was the X-Ray Spex song ‘Oh Bondage! Up Yours!’, very apt for the Handmaid’s Tale and for a protest T-shirt no less!
Released in 1977 the songs lyrics speak of the servitude of not only women but of anybody forced into anything which goes against basic human rights. Initially stating you can ‘Bind me/Tie me/Chain me to the wall/I wanna be a slave to you all’ But then...’Oh bondage up yours!/Oh bondage no more!/Oh bondage up yours!’ The lyrics are saying you can do all those things to me as a human being but I won’t be broken by your regimes.
youtube
X-Ray Spex [DAVID299333]. (2013, Apr 30). X-Ray Spex - Oh Bondage! Up Yours! [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYMObdOqcRg
Poly Styrene, the lead singer and founder of the band X-Ray Spex was a really interesting and fashionable lady. Sadly she died of breast cancer in 2011 but has left behind a punk legacy that remains strong to this day. In the early 70′s - after being inspired by the paint splattered clothing at Brixton shop Pollocks -  she started her own ‘POLY STYRENE’ boutique stall at Beaufort Market on the Kings Road, London. Her boyfriend and manager Stuart Falcon had also run boutiques in the late 60′s. In the book Flash Bang Wallop!: Photographs of the Dawn of Punk by Ian Dickson, Poly Styrene (2000) said of punk culture:
"The Punk explosion was a fashion statement as much as a new attitude and a high energy-music buzz. Street-cred counted and no smart lad wanted to be an industry doll."
She had already released a single on GTO records in early 1976 in a reggae style but had failed to be a success. In the summer of 1976, she and Falcon went to see The Sex Pistols at Brighton Pier and were immediately drawn to their energy, then after seeing The Clash at Fulham town hall in October 1976 Poly was inspired to start writing lyrics that were more rebellious and edgy. Later that year she and Falcon decided they’d like to create a band, so the put an advert in the magazine Melody Maker for:
  'YOUNG PUNX WHO WANT TO STICK IT TOGETHER'
After gathering the other members and a few rough rehearsals in Falcon’s living room later, they played their first gig London's Roxy in Covent Garden - the X-Ray Spex were born. The name apparently was from an advert Poly had seen in a porn magazine for glasses that you could see naked ladies through called X-Ray Spex.
Tumblr media
Dickson, I. (1991). Inside unorthodox punk icon Poly Styrene’s wild, day-glo style. [Photograph]. Retrieved from https://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/article/43847/1/poly-styrene-dayglo-xray-spex-celeste-bell-style-riot-grrrl-punk.
Websites:
Punk77. (2013). X Ray Spex - History Part 1-3. Retrieved from http://www.punk77.co.uk/groups/x_ray_spex.htm.
X-Ray Spex. (2005). X-RAY SPEX 1976 -1978. Retrieved from http://www.x-rayspex.com/x_ray_spex/activity1.html.
Literature:
Dickson, I. (2000). Flash Bang Wallop!: Photographs of the Dawn of Punk (n.d ed.). London: Abstract Sounds Publishing.
0 notes
obtusemedia · 6 years ago
Text
In Ascending Order: Ranking Taylor Swift’s singles worst to best
Tumblr media
After slowly tilting her sound away from Nashville more and more with each album, Taylor Swift made a clean break from country five years ago with her synthpop masterpiece, 1989. It was about as successful as a pop album could be, producing three massive #1 hits and cementing Swift as the world’s biggest popstar.
Fast forward three years, and her next album, reputation, was bitter and moody — a good fit for the American landscape of 2017, but a far cry from the bright melodies and fun sing-a-longs of her previous smashes, Red and 1989. The lead single hit #1, but quickly stumbled down the charts and the album’s follow-up singles didn’t have the same impact. But you’ll still find those who defend reputation, and a year and a half later, it’s clear there are some gems hidden in the wreckage. 
Now that Swift is entering her 30th year of life with a catalogue that’s ran the gamut from country-fried ballads about teen crushes to vengeful electropop bangers about Kanye West, I thought it was a good time to look back on her career. Because despite her negative (sorry) reputation right now, Swift has contributed many great songs to the modern pop canon.
Here’s the ground rules: The song had to be a single from one of Taylor Swift’s six albums. No deep cuts (apologies to “All Too Well”), no soundtrack tunes (sorry, Fifty Shades) and no featured spots on others’ songs (asking me to listen voluntarily to John Mayer is too much to ask, sorry).
#37: “End Game” feat. Future and Ed Sheeran (reputation, 2017)
Listen, Taylor, if you want to have guest rappers on your single, that’s fine. But maybe get, you know, actual rappers. Ed Sheeran doing his awkward schtick certainly does not count. If this was a hip-hop flavored pop song, fine — then why is legitimate rapper Future here? The Atlanta trap icon feels so out of place on this gentrified R&B cut, and he only gets a few bars anyways, making his appearance seem more like Swift wanting cred more than anything else.
Honestly, if that was the only problem, “End Game” wouldn’t be last place on this list. But nope, the song itself is a giant mess in itself. The production aims for sexy and nocturnal and lands in lethargic. And what is this song even about? Is Taylor making a song about how cool she and her boyfriend are, or about her negative reputation? The post-chorus, which suddenly veers into that later topic, tries so desperately to be a chant-along and it falls utterly flat.
With all of Swift’s other singles, even the ones I don’t like, I at least understand how someone could like it. But I have no clue who “End Game” is for, or who would enjoy listening to it.
#36: “Ours” (Speak Now, 2010)
I’ve listened to this song many times, and I find it hard to remember a single hook or line. “Ours” isn’t aggressively awful, but it is painfully bland, and I have no plans on listening to this nondescript ballad after I’m done writing this.
#35: “Fifteen” (Fearless, 2008)
I can’t take away the good intentions of “Fifteen.” The general message of being wary of manipulative older men (or, in this case, high school seniors) and enjoying youth while it lasts is nice, if a bit cliché.
But this song still bugs me. Swift sings the story of her and her (real-life!) friend Abigail’s experiences as ninth-graders like she’s a wise elder, looking back with years of experience. But she was only 18 when she wrote “Fifteen” — I’m sure she matured some in those three years, but once you realize that, it makes the whole song come off as fairly condescending.
Couple the after-school special lyrics with a sickeningly sweet acoustic guitar musical style, and “Fifteen” doesn’t hit the mark.
#34: “Gorgeous” (reputation)
The lyrics aren’t the problem here (except that any Angeleno knows that at the intersection of Sunset and Vine, it’s just a Walgreens). Nah, it’s the shrink-wrapped production that drives me nuts. There was the potential for a great, 1989-esque pop song here, but it got neutered.
#33: “Mean” (Speak Now)
Given that Swift eventually became the music industry’s Regina George, this song has aged horribly. Also, this sounds way too much like the Country Bear Jamboree for me to take it seriously.
#32: “Bad Blood” feat. Kendrick Lamar (1989, 2014)
The worst song from Swift’s best album, “Bad Blood” is a clunky mess that frankly doesn’t go hard enough. If you’re going to make a diss track towards Katy Perry, go for the kill shot! Prism was mediocre, her whole look was tacky, she wrote this disaster — Swift had plenty of options. But I guess she felt adding a couple phoned-in Kendrick Lamar verses, getting Selena Gomez and Lena Dunham (??) in the music video, and spouting clichés did the job better. *shrugs* At least it’s catchy.
(Side note: Perry obviously lost that feud, but “Teenage Dream” is absolutely flawless and probably better than any song Swift wrote)
#31: “Everything Has Changed” feat. Ed Sheeran (Red, 2012)
“Everything Has Changed” has a gorgeous, wilting chorus, and Swift and Sheeran have clear chemistry. Beyond that, it’s unfortunately kind of forgettable.
#30: “Fearless” (Fearless)
I’m honestly not sure why this needed to be a single. It’s fine and all, but it doesn’t stick in the brain compared to Fearless’ other smash hits.
#29: “New Year’s Day” (reputation)
Ending the brash reputation with a quiet, sparse piano ballad was a smart move, and the bittersweet “New Year’s Day” is a solid enough tune. 
But here’s the thing — Swift wasn’t the only popstar in 2018 to put a minimalist, Jack Antonoff-produced piano song on her album. Lorde did nearly the exact same thing just a few months earlier with the heartbreaking “Liability,” which is much rawer and more intense than “New Year’s Day.” In other words, when I hear Swift’s ballad, I enjoy it, but I find myself wishing she went for the emotional jugular like Lorde did.
#28: “Tim McGraw” (Taylor Swift, 2006)
Here’s the part where I admit that I’m really not into country music, so a lot of Swift’s very early material isn’t for me. But, like with other genres I don’t love, I can at least respect talent, and “Tim McGraw” is a great piece of detailed, nuanced songwriting. But acoustic-y country ballads will never be my favorite.
#27: “The Last Time” feat. Gary Lightbody (Red)
Here, we have the opposite situation as “Tim McGraw” — a musical style I love, but not done very well.
These types of Coldplay-esque, faux-indie power ballads were totally my thing back in the day (shoutout to The Fray and obviously, Coldplay). But although “The Last Time” does have real bonafides with its soaring chorus, great guitar solo, and Snow Patrol frontman Gary Lightbody contributing vocals, it just doesn’t click. The duo doesn’t have a lot of chemistry, and the epic feel shoots for “Chasing Cars” and lands closer to...one of Snow Patrol’s other songs that nobody remembers.
#26: “...Ready For It?” (reputation)
I’d love to just make a snarky joke about Swift trying to rap and embarrassing herself in the process (which she kind of does) ... but I can’t lie, this is a total guilty pleasure. It’s about as close to a classic Ke$ha song as we’re going to get in the gloomy late-2010′s, so I can forgive the try-hard vibe.
#25: “Our Song” (Taylor Swift)
This is the very first of Swift’s songs I ever heard. Naturally, being a 13-year-old wannabe snob at the time, I hated it immediately.
Over a decade later, I can appreciate “Our Song” for its adorable charms and extremely quotable lyrics (“when you talk reeeeeeal slow” is my personal favorite). But it still rubs me the wrong way a bit, probably because Swift was pretending to be a southern hick when she was actually raised by a wealthy family in Reading, Pennsylvania. ...but it’s still a solid pop tune.
#24: “Mine” (Speak Now)
So uh...I guess Swift really wanted to write a Bruce Springsteen song? Specifically, a more optimistic version of “The River,” with a romantically doomed teenage flame sputtering out into adult financial troubles.
But obviously, a song about a shotgun wedding and blue-collar poverty wasn’t going to sell to Swift’s audience, so she gave the trope an uplifting spin, complete with a bright, peppy chorus in a major key. And it kind of works! I’m not going to pretend that “Mine” is top-tier Taylor, but sometimes rough stories do have a happy ending.
#23: “Should’ve Said No” (Taylor Swift)
A nice and pissed-off song about a cheating boyfriend, “Should’ve Said No” has a great, visceral chorus and Swift puts 100 percent of the blame on her scummy ex, who’s trying to weasel his way back into the relationship. I will say this about country: it’s a great vehicle for breakup songs.
#22: “The Story of Us” (Speak Now)
This is a great example of a very under-used style of breakup song — the slowly-drifting-apart story. It’s not usually as fiery, but it’s a lot more realistic and relatable. The best recent example I can think of is The 1975′s new wave heartbreaker “A Change of Heart,” which admittedly, is a lot better than “The Story of Us.”
Still, Swift gives the trope a nice effort here, and the charging guitars perfectly match her growing frustration at this boy who gets more and more distant as time goes on. The book framing device is a nice twist too (“NEXT CHAPTER.”), and it all adds up to one of Swift’s more underrated singles.
#21: “Look What You Made Me Do” (reputation)
Ahh yes, the infamous Kanye West diss track. Let’s be clear, nobody looked good in this feud — Taylor came off as vindictive, back-stabbing and petty. Then Kanye lost any moral high ground by wearing MAGA hats and buddying up to Trump.
The funny thing is, the songs from both artists that are central to this feud — “Look What You Made Me Do” and Kanye’s “Famous,” the song that reignited Swift’s rage — are both deeply ridiculous songs that I love despite my better judgement. The main issue with Swift’s song is that she can’t decide whether to play the cackling villain or the victim. The smart move would’ve been to lean into her dark side, like Kanye himself did with Yeezus, but she isn’t willing to completely do that, which makes the song have a pretty awkward tone.
YET. “Look What You Made Me Do” is still way too much fun for me to hate. The “I’m Too Sexy”-aping chorus? Love it. The thumping, wonderfully stupid Black Eyed Peas-esque production? Give me more! “I’m sorry, the old Taylor can’t come to the phone right now. Why? BECAUSE SHE’S DEAD!!” — that might be my favorite part of all.
It’s a total disaster, but it’s a highly enjoyable one. But considering that I find other bombs like Lady Gaga’s ARTPOP fascinating too, maybe my opinion isn’t valid on this one.
#20: “22″ (Red)
I read a tweet once that called this song the “Kidz Bop ‘Tik Tok.’” Don’t remember who wrote that, but they’re absolutely right. Not that there’s anything wrong with that! It’s probably the closest Swift came to a squeaky-clean Carly Rae Jepsen banger.
#19: “White Horse” (Fearless)
The darker cousin of “Love Story,” Swift proved with “White Horse” she could also use classic tropes to convey weepy ballads as well as the sweeping romances. I honestly wish the lyrics were a little less vague — usually Swift is hyper-specific, which serves her well in these breakup songs — but Swift’s emotive performance carries the song regardless.
#18: “Begin Again” (Red)
Musically, the sleepy sound of “Begin Again” doesn’t do a lot for me, but the lyrical detail and story are stellar. After listening to so many Taylor Swift songs about crushing heartbreak or whirlwind romances for this list, it’s nice to hear a more understated song about a first-date that goes well. It especially works well at the end of Red, a fairly angsty album. 
“Begin Again” might still have some exaggerations (nobody’s first date is that perfect, Taylor, come on now), but the more grounded, mature tone was a nice change of pace for Swift.
#17: “Shake It Off” (1989)
This song is so, so stupid. And yet I know every single word. Yes, even the incredibly awkward rap breakdown (“THIS. SICK. BEAT!”).
I can’t in good conscience name “Shake It Off” as a top-tier Swift single, but it’s damn fun, despite its awful lyrics. Which basically makes it — gasp — a Katy Perry single. Oh, the irony.
#16: “Delicate” (reputation)
Swift went nocturnal with this sleeper hit. I couldn’t get into it at first, but it eventually grew on me, with its subtle production and charmingly insecure lyrics. Who among us hasn’t nervously second-guessed everything they’ve said or done when they’re around a new romantic partner?
The vocoders and slowly building percussion just add to what was already a solid groove, and it’s no wonder that “Delicate” eventually creeped up the charts despite the fact that, as Swift said herself, her reputation’s never been worse.
#15: “Picture To Burn” (Taylor Swift)
If I’m going to enjoy a country song, it better be ridiculous and stuffed with as many goofy clichés as possible. The single can’t take itself too seriously (and should be super catchy, of course). This is why some of the few country songs I semi-ironically love sound less like George Strait and more like “Man! I Feel Like A Woman.” If all country music was as silly as “Save A Horse, Ride A Cowboy,” I’d probably like the genre a lot more.
“Picture To Burn” isn’t quite on those songs’ level, but it nearly matches the same level of yee-haw fun. Swift puts on an aggressive Southern accent, there’s a literal banjo solo at one point, and it’s about the best country topic there is: getting revenge on your ex!
Swift leaves no shot unfired as she calls out her former boyfriend for her “stupid ‘ol pickup truck you never let me drive,” calls him a stupid redneck, threatens to date all his friends and even gets her daddy involved. (At one point, the song contained a lyric about telling his friends he was gay, but thankfully, she later removed it)
It’s not quite “Honky Tonk Badonkadonk,” but it’ll do in a pinch.
#14: “Wildest Dreams” (1989)
One of the smartest things Swift’s done during her blockbuster pop era is cribbing ideas from other musicians and adapting them to her own personality. As mentioned earlier, “22″ is her version of a Ke$ha party song, “Mine” is like one of Springsteen’s heartland tunes, and “Shake It Off” is an intentionally dumb Katy Perry single.
But probably the most obvious example of this is “Wildest Dreams.” And the artist Swift cribs from on this sweeping ballad is more of a cult favorite than a true pop megastar: Lana Del Rey. Don’t lie, you hear it too: the cooing, sensual vocals, the cinematic sound, the lyrics that evoke classic Hollywood romance. It’s basically just “Summertime Sadness” without the Spaghetti western guitars.
And that’s absolutely a good thing! Although Swift doesn’t have Lana’s stunning alto vocal (sorry, but you know it’s true), she can still absolutely play that classic movie starlet role. Add a bit more modern pop structure to Del Rey’s indie-darling formula, and you’ve got the recipe for an easy standout track.
#13: “You Belong With Me” (Fearless)
Pointing out that “You Belong With Me,” arguably Swift’s biggest early hit, is problematic isn’t a new take. The idea of that someone inherently “belongs” with you because you like them has been debunked. I’m sorry this guy doesn’t you like you back Taylor, but maybe he has a good thing going with that cheer captain who wears short skirts? Let him be.
...but on the other hand, Swift was 19 when she wrote “You Belong With Me.” Most people criticizing the lyrics here are doing so through an adult vantage. Yes, the message is toxic, but it’s also extremely accurate to how teenage crushes work. I can promise you that I had similar feelings in junior high/high school, and I know I’m not alone in that regard. 
Also, “You Belong With Me” is far too catchy and bouncy to truly hate. So although I can’t rank it too high due to the iffy lyrics, I can’t deny that it does tap into some raw teen emotions, even if they’re ugly.
#12: “I Knew You Were Trouble.” (Red)
I was there. That fateful day in 2012 when Taylor Swift *gasp* MADE A DUBSTEP SONG. People were snarking that this was basically just Skrillex for the Forever 21 crowd, sharing around that (hilarious) screaming goat remix, and so on.
But seven years later, although that dubstep production is oh-so-early-’10s, “I Knew You Were Trouble” absolutely holds up. If Swift was going to abandon country, why not go all out? Besides, the drop still hits with a lot of force, mirroring the visceral anger of her lyrics. If anything, it isn’t intense enough. Maybe she really should’ve gotten Skrillex to produce...
#11: “Out Of The Woods” (1989)
YES inject that synthy Jack Antonoff production right into my veins.
I’m still upset that “Out Of The Woods” wasn’t a smash like 1989′s other singles, but it is a pretty weird song. The chorus is aggressively repetitive (its only real flaw), it’s a breakup song that’s less relatable lyrically and more abstract, and America was too busy paying attention at the time to Bieber semi-apologizing.
But THAT PRODUCTION. It’s nervy yet propulsive, with a quiet-loud-quiet setup that any good power ballad needs. Antonoff even provides some backup vocals, which is always a welcome addition. Swift herself really sells the song too. I wouldn’t say she’s a powerhouse singer, but she’s really giving it her all here in terms of vocal force — something she typically shies away from.
“Out Of The Woods” will likely be lost to time for all but the most ardent Swifties. But for those who love it, may I suggest listening to some Bleachers?
Tumblr media
#10: “Back To December” (Speak Now)
The stereotype of Swift’s breakup songs, particularly in the early stage of her career, was that they weren’t self-aware and basically demonized whatever boy the song was about (or the girl she was jealous of). And while that’s not 100 percent true, the stereotype did have some merit back then.
That’s why “Back To December” was rightfully hailed as a breath of fresh air for Swift, and it’s held up extremely well nine years later. The perspective has shifted — in this story, she’s the one admitting guilt for ending the relationship. It’s a very measured, mature song, but with still enough tender emotion and regret to stay relatable. The orchestral sweep is a nice touch as well, emphasizing the tragedy of the situation.
Also, fun fact: This song is about Swift’s relationship with Twilight hunk Taylor Lautner. Maybe the relationship didn’t work out because she thought it was weird to date a guy with the same name? It was probably because she’s more of a Hunger Games fan.
Tumblr media
#9: “Getaway Car” (reputation)
Here’s the one thing reputation improved upon from 1989. As just a cursory listen could tell you, “Getaway Car,” sonically, is extremely similar to “Out Of The Woods.” They’re both pulsing, synthy new wave tracks with a heavy Bleachers influence — considering they’re both Antonoff productions, not surprising at all. It even steals a lyric from Bleachers’ “Rollercoaster.”
So what makes “Getaway Car” a superior sequel? Well, it’s a smoother ride, for sure — the aggressively repetitive chorus in “Out Of The Woods” was that song’s weak spot. And “Getaway” has a more clear concept as well, being about a Bonnie and Clyde-inspired escape from a failing relationship, invoking all the bittersweet emotions that come along with that. “Out Of The Woods” is...about a car crash with Harry Styles? I guess?
It’s really a personal call. They’re both amazing songs, I just happen to think Swift and Antonoff refined their collaboration on this later attempt.
Tumblr media
#8: “Teardrops On My Guitar” (Taylor Swift)
“Teardrops On My Guitar” is both obviously written by a 15-year-old kid, but also so, so much better than that implies. 
The lyrics here are extremely wholesome and corny — unlike “You Belong With Me,” Swift doesn’t even take any shots at the girl her crush is currently dating, and there’s references to “wishing stars,” something I think I’ve only ever heard in Disney songs. And like many of Swift’s early songs, it absolutely nails the yearning emotions of a teenage crush, especially for those of us who were too shy to do anything about them.
But obviously, Swift wasn’t an average ninth-grader. The lilting melody in the verses of “Teardrops” fits the lyrics perfectly. And the song comes off both very polished and radio-ready, yet still plucked right from the pages of a diary. Yes, Swift co-wrote the song with pop-country songwriter Liz Rose, but that’s not unusual for a very young artist. Lorde’s “Royals” (written at age 16) had a co-writer, too.
The simple beauty of “Teardrops” is what brought Swift into the mainstream, and there’s a good reason for that: it’s an incredible start to a career.
Tumblr media
#7: “Blank Space” (1989)
“Blank Space” might be the only intentional, successful self-own in recent pop history. I can’t think of another time when an artist eviscerated their public persona with such surgical precision, and it actually made them more endearing.
Tired of trolls constantly making jokes about her short relationships and constant breakup songs, Swift decided to make the joke herself, 8 Mile-style. In “Blank Space,” she paints herself as a psychotic maneater who will drive any guy insane. Out of all her disses over the years, she might have saved the best barb for herself: “Darling, I’m a nightmare dressed like a daydream.” The instant tone switch from the cooing, seductive first verse to the furious, delusional second verse is brilliant.
If there’s one flaw to “Blank Space,” it’s that the production is maybe a tad too minimalist for such an intense song. But the hook is still massive, and the song isn’t about the production anyways: It’s 100 percent a lyrical showcase for Swift, and a way to beat her haters at their own game. 
Dissing yourself while still coming off smart is a tough tightrope to walk, as “Look What You Made Me Do” unfortunately proved. But with “Blank Space,” Taylor proved that, even if for a brief moment, she controlled the narrative.
(Also, this is Taylor’s best video. Obviously.)
Tumblr media
#6: “Sparks Fly” (Speak Now)
A lot of the other songs in this top 10 work because of a very specific reason, whether it be the production or a clever lyrical conceit. But it’s difficult to describe what makes “Sparks Fly” fly so well. 
At first glance, it’s not that much different than other early upbeat Swift singles — it’s got the country-rock guitars, lovesick lyrics, a bit of a twang but not too much. But this is where that formula reaches perfection. It’s no wonder that after “Speak Now,” Swift tilted hard into pure pop, because she wasn’t going to top this.
The chorus is passionate and soaring, with even the percussive lyrics ( “Drop. Everything. Now.”) contributing. And this seems like a super-odd aspect of a Taylor Swift song to compliment, but “Sparks Fly” also has a fantastic guitar riff — something few of her pop contemporaries would try.
Sometimes what makes a song great is to just have every aspect go perfectly, and that’s exactly what happened with “Sparks Fly.”
Tumblr media
#5: “Red” (Red)
The title track to Swift’s instant-classic album Red is the closest she’s come to being a full-fledged rockstar (well, that and album cut “State Of Grace,” which is an obvious U2 pastiche). It’s definitely more of a country-fried, Sheryl Crow brand of rock, but it suits Swift well. There’s even a killer guitar solo!
As a summation of a whirlwind relationship, “Red” absolutely nails the bittersweet feelings that come after a breakup. Even the best moments or aspects of her ex have a dark side, but she seems equally wistful about the worst moments. And the color-based chorus (a few years before Halsey stole the idea), complete with a new wave-y vocal echo, is simple but effective. It’s the perfect middle between Swift’s uber-pop era to come and her Nashville songwriter past.
Tumblr media
#4: “New Romantics” (1989)
I was hesitant to include “New Romantics” on this list. Yes, it was a single, but it was also a tacked-on bonus track to 1989. But it’s too damn perfect of a pop song to leave off.
Honestly, how was this not included in the regular tracklisting of 1989? Yes, it’s her best album, so there’s not a lot of filler, but “New Romantics” would’ve still been an improvement over nearly all of the songs there. The production by pop wizards Max Martin and Shellback pops and whizzes with energy. It’s pure ‘80s heaven, with an anthemic sing-along chorus and bouncy synths and drum machines.
But naturally, Swift herself is a major factor to why “New Romantics” is such an effective pop song. Her vocal delivery here has a knowing wink, with a bit of snark. You might even call it Debbie Harry-esque. For a song where Swift is conveying the joys of non-stop partying, she certainly sells it. And I’d imagine if she released it as a regular single earlier in 1989′s cycle, it would’ve been another #1 smash.
Tumblr media
#3: “Love Story” (Fearless)
“Love Story” deliberately misinterprets multiple literary classics to create an uber-cheesy, ridiculous fairy tale. And it’s easily the best song of her country era, and one of the best pop songs of the ‘00s, bar none.
The star-crossed lovers angle is overdone, yes, but Swift sings about this secret relationship with such passion and earnestness that it feels fresh again. When the surprise ending comes and the boyfriend proposes (wait, aren’t they both high schoolers? Maybe wait a bit on that one, guys), it’s got all the sappiness of a Hallmark special, and yet it totally works. You can tell the then-18 Swift didn’t find this cheesy in the slightest, and her bold, passionate sincerity works.
Even the fact that the song seems to not understand what The Scarlet Letter was actually about, or how Romeo and Juliet ends, is honestly more charming than anything else. “Love Story” is like a puppy — full of boundless joy and absolutely impossible to resist, despite not being all that smart.
Tumblr media
#2: “Style” (1989)
I can’t imagine the confusion and shock that Swift’s management must have felt when she told them she wanted to record a song that sounded like the Drive soundtrack. But it was an absolutely brilliant move, and it gave us the song that will likely age better than any of Swift’s other singles.
To be fair, “Style” is much more radio-friendly than your average Chromatics single — but not by much! Swift’s vocals are less ethereal than Ruth Radelet’s, and the hooks are much more obvious. But many Chromatics songs, or songs from Drive, are already pretty catchy — Swift just needed to maximize them into a slinky-yet-explosive new wave behemoth.
The pulsating synth background and Swift’s whispery vocals make “Style” an all-time classic song for aimlessly driving around at night, yet it’s big enough to fit in with her more blunt hits. In fact, it might be the one time she actually seemed *gasp* cool. It’s too bad reputation tried so hard to recapture this dusky vibe and utterly failed, but at least we’ll always have her first attempt.
Tumblr media
#1: “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together” (Red)
It took Swift many, many tries to capture that elusive first #1 hit. But when she finally reached that pinnacle in 2012 with the gleefully venomous “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together,” it made perfect sense. After all, it’s her best song.
Swift has written many breakup songs before, but she’s never had this much fun knocking down her ex — in this case, the famously sleazy John Mayer. And her digs are just so relentless and delivered with a perfect smirk. There’s the dig at Mayer listening to “some indie record that’s much cooler than mine,” which drips with sarcasm. She calls him out for his inability to fully commit, saying both that his breakups and makeups only “last about a day.” And of course, there’s also that wonderfully exasperated phone call, where Swift groans about her ex’s persistence, calling the situation “exhausting” and mocking him. 
The best part is that all of this is delivered in a sugary-sweet, insanely catchy campfire sing-along that wouldn’t leave anyone’s heads in the fall of 2012. That chorus is just so joyful and fun that you have expect the little bouncing ball to pop up next to the “WHEEE-EEE!”
It seems weird to say Swift’s best song is also her big sell-out moment, but some artists were just meant to be pure pop. And in Swift’s case, she didn’t sacrifice any of her sharp songwriting en route to a catchier, more fun sound, which created one of the most iconic pop songs of the ‘10s.
1 note · View note
sambashua · 7 years ago
Text
8 questions tag~
hellooooo❁
well i was tagged by @king-hao​ and also i just wanted to do @strawberryboo​ ‘s questions bc i’m bored and she’s a damn gem so yayyyy i’m not gonna tag anyone tho
sister’s questions(✿◠‿◠)
1. What is your favorite kpop choreography? i legit wrote an article abt this soooooooo yeah i was struggling.... but then i remember that nct dream’s my first and last happened and if you think that isn’t THE best choreo you’re a fool... consider that the dance moves never repeat except for a single move at the end of the chorus. not to mention the moves are very rigorous too thanks to the extensive floor work. also the fact that there are an even number of members (comeback jaemin) the formations are even more tricky... bye i could talk abt this for 700 years
2. What MV is the most aesthetically pleasing to you? (not necessarily your favorite MV, just which one matches your aesthetic the most) uhhhhhh what even hmmmm i’ll say check in by svt’s hip hop unit actually bc i really like traveling and also wonwoo’s face:3 (and luna’s free somebody but what’s new) oh shoot also all the loona mv’s ahhh the one i like aesthetically best is probably choerry’s love cherry motion tho edit: shoottttttt i forgot fri.sat.sun by dalshabet a true fave
3. Literally just write a paragraph about your ultimate bias. Here’s your chance to rant about ur fave bye you fool you asked for this AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH well for starters if you don’t know... jeon wonwoo is the actual love of my life. for so many reasons he has become and remained my bias for about a year and a half which doesn’t seem long but he has been my only ult bias! usually i make fun of him but to be honest he is one of the most sweet and caring people i’ve ever seen. he may tease his members and make dumb comments but that’s really the only way he can express his affection. he’s very shy and he’s said without svt he wouldn’t have been friends w the members bc he is introverted. but he’s so grateful to be able to be so close w the boys my heart. he’s also such a huge dork which i love. as a fellow dork i support. i love how he’s so smart and witty and always has the best comebacks. i love how he gets so invested in books that he was ready to actually fight soonyoung for throwing his book once akhgfkal. he’s such a soft boy also like can you imagine him w a tiny kitten?? he’s afraid of dogs (like a damn dork) but w a kitten he’d be so careful holding it and loving cry. also i want to protect and care for him so much he has so many physical ailments like wonu how are you still in one piece but he stays strong for his members and for carats♡ wow dude i didn’t even yell i must be in a soft mood tonight hmmm
4. When did your bias look the softest? (include photo evidence if u have it) i mean wonwoo is soft 24/7 like i’m p sure his “style” is just comfy okay but basically all of pretty u era was just the SOFTEST honestly wonwoo invented soft mhmmmm like sweater paws ??? all ? the ? time ????? iconic
if i had to choose tho...
Tumblr media Tumblr media
but any nose crinkles are verified the softest™
Tumblr media
(creds)
5. What kpop merchandise do you own? (if any) well not a whole lot sister buys a lot of albums but i have some photo cards and posters from her and other friends:D when we went to LA tho we bought a lot of kpop stuff but i guess i only got some postcards and a poster hmmmm but @strawberryboo​ hAS SENT ME FOUR BEAUTIFUL KEYCHAINS WHICH I LOVE W MY WHOLE HORT THAT SHE MADE W HER OWN TWO HANDS WHAT KIND OF LEGEND (my keys are very heavy but it’s definitely worth it)
6. What August debut or comeback are you most excited for? well the main reason i’m finally doing this is bc august is tomorrow oops oh shoot technically it’s in two hours h e l p and this question is illegal bc literally so many faves are coming back i can’t even remember them all... i know for sure snsd, gfriend, samuel, n.flying, wanna one, weki meki, nu’est, boyfriend uhh ofc day6 and loona uhhhhhhhhh shoot i know there’s more fuck and i would say nct dream is who i’m most excited for but technically they haven’t announced it yet so...
7. Of your favorite groups, which one do you think has the prettiest lightstick? hmmmmm i may be biased... but seventeen’s is so pretty... i like monsta x’s too and vixx’s.... apink’s and got7′s are cute too... but carat bong has my heart
8. Of your favorite groups, which one do you think has the best fandom name? i mean again... biased... carat is so frickin cute bye~ but monbebe, honey10 and tinkerbell are also very cute! and i should mention that i didn’t really like NCTzen at first but them being excited abt it made me love it:)
emma’s questions(✿◠‿◠)
1. Ok so I’m gonna steal one of the questions that Mir answered in hers and its is if you could have any idols hairstyle past or present whose would you choose? bye i already did this lol but i’ll add taeyeon’s hair in why promotions and luna in this look:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
byeeeee (i think creds to © No.91812 ? but there’s no credit:( (y’all don’t steal shit from fansites pls))
2. If you could take your bias group or just your bias and put them into another universe i.e. wizarding world or similar what world would you but them in? And why? okay i’m gonna copy sister and say ATLA too just bc i want to go there tbh~~~ i feel like wonu and i would be two average peeps tho w/o bending... unless i can maybe see wonu as a fire bender but he only uses it for dumb things like heating up his tea dfhlalfkjdaf oh shoot it’s bias group hmmmm well they will be our children i guess idk it’s late no it’s not it’s only 10:20 who am i anymore
3. Fave idol outfit? doesn’t have to be your bias just any outfit you’ve liked! Provide pictures if you want! i’ve really liked all of chungha’s outfits in why don’t you know promotions they’ve all been so summery kaflhjadskj also seohyun’s looks in don’t say no like destroy me and all of mamamoo’s you’re the best looks were iconic bye and ofccccccc luna in free somebody my all time fave ever
Tumblr media
(i got this poster in LA and i’m still screaming)
i said ‘all’ so many times wow but i was gonna do boy groups too but it’s fine
4. Favorite fancams? Im a fancam ho I need recs plx. wellll i don’t watch a lot of fancams tbh but i think i have a couple faves? (oops they’re all my biases too but it’s fine)
youtube
wonwoo was so damn soft another soft time and also one of my favorite outfits eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee i just love this
youtube
dowoon is so dang cute he’s having such a good time and also thE END WATCH THE END YOU WILL NOT REGRET HE MAKES ME SO SOFT A TRUE BEAN
youtube
this one doesn’t need an explanation just that it’s illegal... but i do wish they hadn’t cut up the footage so much
5. What are your favorite girl group non title songs, if you don’t have any what are your favorite gg mvs? hmmmmm i really like magic by seohyun, mojito by red velvet (happy 3 years every bunny), next page by twice, babyface by wjsn, u & me by hyuna (does that count she’s a soloist ah), all mine by f(x) uhhhh tbh i mostly listen to title tracks bc i’m lazy... i normally don’t listen to full albums unless it’s svt, nct or monsta x or astro or a couple others idk i listened to all of wjsn and red velvet’s new ones why am i even still talking i should delete this...
6. ok so this was a question Claudent made up in another 8 questions tag that I just love she a brilliant bean! But if you could create your own group drawing from all other groups regardless of companies who would you choose and what would there concept be? whale whale whale i’m gonna keep my last plans but add more boys i think : 99line w dancey rap boys such as nct mark lee! svt chan! sf9 hwiyoung! astro rocky! and i’ll add wanna one park woojin! now it’s an odd number which is perfect! i’d like to see them do smth fun and age appropriate:) maybe a refreshing song abt youth and friendship w awesome choreo:D
7. so you are going to a music festival and in this dream world you get to decide all the ppl/groups that are going to be there, who would you choose? It doesn’t just have to be Kpop! wahhhhhh how many groups can i pick i was thinking of adding some non kpop artists i really like but;;;;; honestly;;;; i mean i love the music but also if i could see kpop artists instead i’d like it a lot better? florence welsh might be my favorite musician ever ever but w all the other things kpop idols do i’d rather see them i think... soooooooo i’d choose ofc svt and nct as co-headliners w monsta x, astro, day6, sf9, wanna one, red velvet, twice, oh my girl and aoa !!!! like how good? also this concert would last so long bc they all need to perform like 5-10 songs bc i love them too much okay... oh damn it could be like a festival nd each night two groups perform yayyyy also i need the interactions™
8. If you could have any talent in the world what would you want it to be? I would want to be in anyway musically inclined rip me tbh. well everyone knows i’m a language ho so i would want to be able to speak at leasy five different languages akfhlas but idl if that’s really a talent... maybe i’d want to be able to write better? or draw that would be so cool~
1 note · View note
racingtoaredlight · 8 years ago
Text
The Great Super Bowl Uniform Matchup Rankings: 30-21
Tumblr media
50-41 and the ramblings of a mad man trying to explain a flawed thought process. 40-31
#30. Super Bowl XX - New England Patriots vs Chicago Bears
Tumblr media
This is a game that I wanted to rank higher, I really did. The old Pat Patriot era New England uniforms are fantastic, obnoxious Americana spilled all over the place and an iconic on the logo. On the flip side you have one of football’s gold standards of uniforms, the Chicago Bears with the classic road whites and sharp navy pants.
But this is the game I referenced earlier about the whole not being the sum of the parts and there’s just something about the two of them lined up against each other that’s not elevating Super Bowl XX to the pantheon. Maybe it’s just knowing that Craig James was involved in this game (I believe that’s his blurred ass in the background above) that’s making me see ugliness where there really is none.
#29. Super Bowl XXXIX - Philadelphia Eagles vs New England Patriots
Tumblr media
This was, oddly enough, the toughest one to rank since everything about how of these just screams blah to me. Kinda like this game now that I’m thinking about it, never before had I seen a Super Bowl decided in the 4th quarter be so utterly unexciting, it was kinda like watching a Saban Alabama game where they’re kinda struggling to score and the other team’s theoretically in it but in your heart of hearts you know they’re not going to win and that was the Eagles against the Patriots.
While a far cry from their kelly green glory days, those Philly uniforms are fine and I think this game looked as good as it possibly could have.
#28. Super Bowl XXIV - Denver Broncos vs San Francisco 49ers
Tumblr media
The Orange Crush has finally made its way onto my list. While in theory that bright an orange and blue helmet should look clownish but they pull it off. Quick shout out to the giant pant stripes of the 80s by the way, the Bears had a similar girth going on.
The problem with such a dominant orange though is it brings a lot of volatility into play depending on who the opponent is. There’s nothing wrong with the San Fran road whites and gold pants, it’s just that the upcoming two Orange Crush Super Bowls were more appealing to this reviewer’s eye. I do like how Super Bowl XXIV featured a rarity and that was a pregame broadcaster saying before kickoff that the game was going to be a blowout and, spoiler alert, it was.
#27. Super Bowl XXVI - New England Patriots vs St. Louis Rams
Tumblr media
So I was looking at my list to pull the next entry, came across this and thought “Why the hell is this up here”, so now I’m going to reverse engineer a rationale for it.
The Rams deserve all the praise for finally matching their helmet blue with that of their jersey, and I far preferred their road uniforms after the switch to their home ones. Switching from mustard yellow to gold in the helmet horns and pants was another winning move which set up an almost cheesy Gold v Silver Super Bowl against the at the time upstart Patriots. New England’s home blues have numbers that don’t annoy me as much so I have successfully talked myself in being validated to have this game up here, it really was pretty to look at.
#26. Super Bowl XXXII - Denver Broncos vs Green Bay Packers
Tumblr media
The darkest Super Bowl Sunday of my existence, Super Bowl XXXII remains a black mark on the franchise and the NFC, which had won 15 straight championships before this one. This is the closest Denver came to having a uniform I liked post-1996 and the matchup of their new world fanciness (I think they were the first to do the giant stripe business) against the classic Packer roadies has me probably having this one higher than any other uniform handicappers would.
Bonus points to the Super Bowl XXXII logo which wasn’t too big and provided a nice color add to both teams’ uniforms. Man I miss Super Bowls having unique logos.
#25. Super Bowl XXII - Denver Broncos vs Washington
Tumblr media
I don’t think I ever appreciated just how many Super Bowls Denver has been in until this exercise.
I love this uniform matchup just because of how much is going on with both squads, they’re so different that they’re somehow beautiful together. I far prefer Washington in the maroon pants to when they break out that yellow bunk, those with the yellow and white stripes are sharp. Bonus points for the giant sleeve lines as well, and I dig the gold outline of the maroon numbers.
Orange Crush stays beautiful too. When the Broncos brought the old D helmet logo back for a Thursday nighter this year I nearly wept with joy.
#24. Super Bowl XLVI - New England Patriots vs New York Giants
Tumblr media
#23. Super Bowl XLII - New England Patriots vs New York Giants
Tumblr media
The first of three sets of uniforms that would meet in multiple Super Bowls these hit all the right notes, at least for games involving the Patriots. New England home blues, Giants crisp road whites with the red numbering and those slick as hell NY helmets. I don’t know if a greater disparity exists between home and road for me than the Pats. If these jerseys were swapped we would have covered them yesterday. But as it stands, two of the more classic Super Bowl games of my lifetime both had the same aesthetically pleasing attire.
#22. Super bowl XLVII - San Francisco 49ers vs Baltimore Ravens
Tumblr media
Probably not fair to this game that it’s mostly remember for the power outage and controversial non-call on San Francisco’s final offensive snap since it was both a fantastic football game and a fantastic game to look at. The 49ers return to the Super Bowl came with their new old uniforms returns, no fancy bullshit with the numbers and gold pants as gold intended. Great uniform.
And joining them in a uniform upgrade from their last Super Bowl appearance were the Ravens. Granted the 3D numbers is still there (although not too obnoxious) but the switch to black pants to pair with the black helmet I really liked. And like Broncos-Washington the stark difference between the two really worked for me. Some games look like they could be intersquad scrimmages (like Giants-Patriots and their red white and blue patterns) which is fine but when divergent looks click on the field I’m all in.
#21. Super Bowl XXXVII - Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Oakland Raiders
Tumblr media
If anyone actually gives two shits about these rankings I reckon this Super Bowl being this high could cause the loudest roars of disapproval. Well here is where I risk any and all cred built up as an authority on sports uniforms when I state I liked the Bucs pewter power. We forget now how incredible it was in 1997 when the Buccaneers ditched this mess (I firmly believe anyone who fondly remembers those uniforms is lying to you) for the sharper dark look. Needless to say that was the season Tony Dungy’s crew broke through and made the playoffs for the first time in forever and started them down a path of respectability. I’m glad they were the home team for this game.
And I’ve run out of praise for the Raiders, the silver and black raises the Buccaneers here same as they did the Viking purple in Super Bowl XI. They’d better keep these colors in Vegas.
3 notes · View notes
velmaemyers88 · 5 years ago
Text
How This Wedding Singer Earns $1.5 Million a Year
Musician Jordan Kahn and Adam Sandler’s character in The Wedding Singer may both wear bold blazers, but that’s where the similarities stop. Though Sandler’s character might personify wedding bands of the past, today’s groups—like Kahn’s namesake Jordan Kahn Orchestra—could well open for the likes of Bruno Mars or Taylor Swift. With professional-level production, high-tech equipment, and massive amounts of talent, these bands elevate the live-music experience at a wedding—all while making sure Grandma is still boogying on the dance floor.
“While Taylor Swift’s concerts are about the people who have connected with her over the years, my concerts are about the bride and groom and their guests,” says Kahn. “Our success is based on one thing, and it’s not ticket sales. It’s people on the dance floor.”
It’s all big business. The U.S. wedding industry alone brings in $72 billion in revenue annually, and the average wedding costs more than $30,000. Talk about luxury weddings, and that number skyrockets into six and seven figures. Music and entertainment are growing chunks of that budget, as couples view the experience for their guests as higher priority than static decor and pour more cash into line items like music, food, and drink. Nearly 20% hire a band, according to The Knot 2018 Real Weddings Study, and when it comes to a band versus a DJ, couples certainly pay up for live musicians: more than three times as much.
When the Jordan Kahn Orchestra takes the stage, you can easily see why they charge tens of thousands of dollars for their ensemble. An event can command anywhere from 11 to 20 musicians, including Kahn as lead singer and emcee, along with drummers, guitars, strings, brass, backup singers, soloists, and even dancers. Out of sight are wires, gear, and cables. An engineer manages the room by walking around with an iPad to check sound levels in various corners, and the speakers are controlled wirelessly. The orchestra has a repertoire of more than 500 songs, including foreign language ballads that require the group to learn, say, Spanish or Hebrew. Every one of their songs will be recognizable to the audience.
“It used to be that bands weren’t nearly as cohesive or creative,” explains event designer and planner Michelle Rago of Michelle Rago Destinations. “They were more cover bands. They didn’t care about sound, outfit coordination, or their repertoire. Now, every band has a look and feel. They have so much more control over sound and image.”
Jordan Kahn
What sets today’s bands apart, and especially Kahn, is that they have honed the skill set to read a crowd. While mainstream artists like Lady Gaga can follow a set list for a concert, Kahn is constantly trying to understand what the crowd at a wedding wants. It’s an ongoing search for feedback and decision-making as to what to play next. If, for instance, he sees too many guests sitting, he’ll queue up the group to play Etta James’s “At Last.” “I use that song as a tool to fill the dance floor if there are a lot of people in their fifties, sixties, and seventies,” he says. From there, it’s on to Bruno Mars’s “Uptown Funk,” a song that, he notes, has an unique appeal for all ages.
“A lot of musicians and bands make the performances about themselves,” Kahn says. “The terrible bands are the ones who pick songs for themselves or think the quality of their show is how many lights they have. We make our performances about our client and their audience.” The orchestra is so committed that he may play three or four hours without a break. By comparison, your typical cover band will demand a 15-minute break every 45 minutes.
The term “wedding band” is not so appealing to couples, especially younger ones who may lean toward a DJ while their parents ask for a live band. Rago explains that most people say they don’t want a “wedding band,” which is where she steps in to educate them. “These bands are performing at a high level,” she says. “They are seasoned. It’s that live-music experience that everyone loves. The energy is electric.” Sometimes, Rago adds, it’s just about taking them to a showcase to meet the bandleader.
In addition to reading the crowd, Kahn’s band also interacts with guests. Brass players will wander through the room, and he makes sure the choreography of his dancers is easy to emulate. He often sees guests following along in front of the stage as if it’s Dance Dance Revolution. Part of his role as emcee is to create hype, something he can do with the mic by inviting guests to put their hands in the air or sing along.
There is a science to it too. Kahn constantly tracks the BPM of his songs to make sure it’s subtly building over the course of an event. He admits that sometimes they even have to scale it back. “Maybe people don’t have enough alcohol in their system to let loose yet,” he says, “so we’ll drop the tempo.”
His namesake orchestra alone brings in more than $1.5 million a year, but he is also growing an entertainment business that manages several musical groups; it sees revenue over $4 million annually. Not only does he have major music cred—he graduated from Berklee College of Music—but his business partner, Chris Stratten, has worked with Nelly Furtado, and many of his musicians come from the acclaimed jazz program at the University of North Texas College of Music. He owns four other bands, which range in price point to cater to a wide demographic of wedding budgets. It’s another way that wedding music has changed; couples can approach entertainment companies, such as Kahn’s, Vali Entertainment, or Elan Artists, and choose from a variety of offerings to fit their style, taste, and budget.
“Bands are taking on the responsibility of presenting a unique footprint musically,” Rago says. “They are sitting down with the client and talking to them, finding ways to make their event special. Some even rescore music. It’s a very custom experience.”
As for event day, that’s when even the newlyweds are blown away. “People are just floored because the music is so tight,” Rago says. “People expect cheesy, and it’s not.”
It’s all a far cry from Sandler’s iconic ’90s character. “Why would someone choose to be a wedding singer?” Kahn asks. “I do it because I love singing songs that people know, that they can relate to and dance to. I love what I do, and I ensure everyone around me does too.”
More must-read stories from Fortune:
—Fortune’s 2019 40 Under 40
—Meet the A.I. landlord that’s building a single-family-home empire
—How automation is cutting into workers’ share of economic output
—Can TikTok turn 950 million downloads into a booming business?
—Digital health companies hit a new VC funding record in 2018
Subscribe to Fortune’s CEO Daily newsletter for the latest business news and analysis.
Credit: Source link
The post How This Wedding Singer Earns $1.5 Million a Year appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.
from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/how-this-wedding-singer-earns-1-5-million-a-year/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-this-wedding-singer-earns-1-5-million-a-year from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.tumblr.com/post/186456592232
0 notes
reneeacaseyfl · 5 years ago
Text
How This Wedding Singer Earns $1.5 Million a Year
Musician Jordan Kahn and Adam Sandler’s character in The Wedding Singer may both wear bold blazers, but that’s where the similarities stop. Though Sandler’s character might personify wedding bands of the past, today’s groups—like Kahn’s namesake Jordan Kahn Orchestra—could well open for the likes of Bruno Mars or Taylor Swift. With professional-level production, high-tech equipment, and massive amounts of talent, these bands elevate the live-music experience at a wedding—all while making sure Grandma is still boogying on the dance floor.
“While Taylor Swift’s concerts are about the people who have connected with her over the years, my concerts are about the bride and groom and their guests,” says Kahn. “Our success is based on one thing, and it’s not ticket sales. It’s people on the dance floor.”
It’s all big business. The U.S. wedding industry alone brings in $72 billion in revenue annually, and the average wedding costs more than $30,000. Talk about luxury weddings, and that number skyrockets into six and seven figures. Music and entertainment are growing chunks of that budget, as couples view the experience for their guests as higher priority than static decor and pour more cash into line items like music, food, and drink. Nearly 20% hire a band, according to The Knot 2018 Real Weddings Study, and when it comes to a band versus a DJ, couples certainly pay up for live musicians: more than three times as much.
When the Jordan Kahn Orchestra takes the stage, you can easily see why they charge tens of thousands of dollars for their ensemble. An event can command anywhere from 11 to 20 musicians, including Kahn as lead singer and emcee, along with drummers, guitars, strings, brass, backup singers, soloists, and even dancers. Out of sight are wires, gear, and cables. An engineer manages the room by walking around with an iPad to check sound levels in various corners, and the speakers are controlled wirelessly. The orchestra has a repertoire of more than 500 songs, including foreign language ballads that require the group to learn, say, Spanish or Hebrew. Every one of their songs will be recognizable to the audience.
“It used to be that bands weren’t nearly as cohesive or creative,” explains event designer and planner Michelle Rago of Michelle Rago Destinations. “They were more cover bands. They didn’t care about sound, outfit coordination, or their repertoire. Now, every band has a look and feel. They have so much more control over sound and image.”
Jordan Kahn
What sets today’s bands apart, and especially Kahn, is that they have honed the skill set to read a crowd. While mainstream artists like Lady Gaga can follow a set list for a concert, Kahn is constantly trying to understand what the crowd at a wedding wants. It’s an ongoing search for feedback and decision-making as to what to play next. If, for instance, he sees too many guests sitting, he’ll queue up the group to play Etta James’s “At Last.” “I use that song as a tool to fill the dance floor if there are a lot of people in their fifties, sixties, and seventies,” he says. From there, it’s on to Bruno Mars’s “Uptown Funk,” a song that, he notes, has an unique appeal for all ages.
“A lot of musicians and bands make the performances about themselves,” Kahn says. “The terrible bands are the ones who pick songs for themselves or think the quality of their show is how many lights they have. We make our performances about our client and their audience.” The orchestra is so committed that he may play three or four hours without a break. By comparison, your typical cover band will demand a 15-minute break every 45 minutes.
The term “wedding band” is not so appealing to couples, especially younger ones who may lean toward a DJ while their parents ask for a live band. Rago explains that most people say they don’t want a “wedding band,” which is where she steps in to educate them. “These bands are performing at a high level,” she says. “They are seasoned. It’s that live-music experience that everyone loves. The energy is electric.” Sometimes, Rago adds, it’s just about taking them to a showcase to meet the bandleader.
In addition to reading the crowd, Kahn’s band also interacts with guests. Brass players will wander through the room, and he makes sure the choreography of his dancers is easy to emulate. He often sees guests following along in front of the stage as if it’s Dance Dance Revolution. Part of his role as emcee is to create hype, something he can do with the mic by inviting guests to put their hands in the air or sing along.
There is a science to it too. Kahn constantly tracks the BPM of his songs to make sure it’s subtly building over the course of an event. He admits that sometimes they even have to scale it back. “Maybe people don’t have enough alcohol in their system to let loose yet,” he says, “so we’ll drop the tempo.”
His namesake orchestra alone brings in more than $1.5 million a year, but he is also growing an entertainment business that manages several musical groups; it sees revenue over $4 million annually. Not only does he have major music cred—he graduated from Berklee College of Music—but his business partner, Chris Stratten, has worked with Nelly Furtado, and many of his musicians come from the acclaimed jazz program at the University of North Texas College of Music. He owns four other bands, which range in price point to cater to a wide demographic of wedding budgets. It’s another way that wedding music has changed; couples can approach entertainment companies, such as Kahn’s, Vali Entertainment, or Elan Artists, and choose from a variety of offerings to fit their style, taste, and budget.
“Bands are taking on the responsibility of presenting a unique footprint musically,” Rago says. “They are sitting down with the client and talking to them, finding ways to make their event special. Some even rescore music. It’s a very custom experience.”
As for event day, that’s when even the newlyweds are blown away. “People are just floored because the music is so tight,” Rago says. “People expect cheesy, and it’s not.”
It’s all a far cry from Sandler’s iconic ’90s character. “Why would someone choose to be a wedding singer?” Kahn asks. “I do it because I love singing songs that people know, that they can relate to and dance to. I love what I do, and I ensure everyone around me does too.”
More must-read stories from Fortune:
—Fortune’s 2019 40 Under 40
—Meet the A.I. landlord that’s building a single-family-home empire
—How automation is cutting into workers’ share of economic output
—Can TikTok turn 950 million downloads into a booming business?
—Digital health companies hit a new VC funding record in 2018
Subscribe to Fortune’s CEO Daily newsletter for the latest business news and analysis.
Credit: Source link
The post How This Wedding Singer Earns $1.5 Million a Year appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.
from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/how-this-wedding-singer-earns-1-5-million-a-year/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-this-wedding-singer-earns-1-5-million-a-year from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.tumblr.com/post/186456592232
0 notes
weeklyreviewer · 5 years ago
Text
How This Wedding Singer Earns $1.5 Million a Year
Musician Jordan Kahn and Adam Sandler’s character in The Wedding Singer may both wear bold blazers, but that’s where the similarities stop. Though Sandler’s character might personify wedding bands of the past, today’s groups—like Kahn’s namesake Jordan Kahn Orchestra—could well open for the likes of Bruno Mars or Taylor Swift. With professional-level production, high-tech equipment, and massive amounts of talent, these bands elevate the live-music experience at a wedding—all while making sure Grandma is still boogying on the dance floor.
“While Taylor Swift’s concerts are about the people who have connected with her over the years, my concerts are about the bride and groom and their guests,” says Kahn. “Our success is based on one thing, and it’s not ticket sales. It’s people on the dance floor.”
It’s all big business. The U.S. wedding industry alone brings in $72 billion in revenue annually, and the average wedding costs more than $30,000. Talk about luxury weddings, and that number skyrockets into six and seven figures. Music and entertainment are growing chunks of that budget, as couples view the experience for their guests as higher priority than static decor and pour more cash into line items like music, food, and drink. Nearly 20% hire a band, according to The Knot 2018 Real Weddings Study, and when it comes to a band versus a DJ, couples certainly pay up for live musicians: more than three times as much.
When the Jordan Kahn Orchestra takes the stage, you can easily see why they charge tens of thousands of dollars for their ensemble. An event can command anywhere from 11 to 20 musicians, including Kahn as lead singer and emcee, along with drummers, guitars, strings, brass, backup singers, soloists, and even dancers. Out of sight are wires, gear, and cables. An engineer manages the room by walking around with an iPad to check sound levels in various corners, and the speakers are controlled wirelessly. The orchestra has a repertoire of more than 500 songs, including foreign language ballads that require the group to learn, say, Spanish or Hebrew. Every one of their songs will be recognizable to the audience.
“It used to be that bands weren’t nearly as cohesive or creative,” explains event designer and planner Michelle Rago of Michelle Rago Destinations. “They were more cover bands. They didn’t care about sound, outfit coordination, or their repertoire. Now, every band has a look and feel. They have so much more control over sound and image.”
Jordan Kahn
What sets today’s bands apart, and especially Kahn, is that they have honed the skill set to read a crowd. While mainstream artists like Lady Gaga can follow a set list for a concert, Kahn is constantly trying to understand what the crowd at a wedding wants. It’s an ongoing search for feedback and decision-making as to what to play next. If, for instance, he sees too many guests sitting, he’ll queue up the group to play Etta James’s “At Last.” “I use that song as a tool to fill the dance floor if there are a lot of people in their fifties, sixties, and seventies,” he says. From there, it’s on to Bruno Mars’s “Uptown Funk,” a song that, he notes, has an unique appeal for all ages.
“A lot of musicians and bands make the performances about themselves,” Kahn says. “The terrible bands are the ones who pick songs for themselves or think the quality of their show is how many lights they have. We make our performances about our client and their audience.” The orchestra is so committed that he may play three or four hours without a break. By comparison, your typical cover band will demand a 15-minute break every 45 minutes.
The term “wedding band” is not so appealing to couples, especially younger ones who may lean toward a DJ while their parents ask for a live band. Rago explains that most people say they don’t want a “wedding band,” which is where she steps in to educate them. “These bands are performing at a high level,” she says. “They are seasoned. It’s that live-music experience that everyone loves. The energy is electric.” Sometimes, Rago adds, it’s just about taking them to a showcase to meet the bandleader.
In addition to reading the crowd, Kahn’s band also interacts with guests. Brass players will wander through the room, and he makes sure the choreography of his dancers is easy to emulate. He often sees guests following along in front of the stage as if it’s Dance Dance Revolution. Part of his role as emcee is to create hype, something he can do with the mic by inviting guests to put their hands in the air or sing along.
There is a science to it too. Kahn constantly tracks the BPM of his songs to make sure it’s subtly building over the course of an event. He admits that sometimes they even have to scale it back. “Maybe people don’t have enough alcohol in their system to let loose yet,” he says, “so we’ll drop the tempo.”
His namesake orchestra alone brings in more than $1.5 million a year, but he is also growing an entertainment business that manages several musical groups; it sees revenue over $4 million annually. Not only does he have major music cred—he graduated from Berklee College of Music—but his business partner, Chris Stratten, has worked with Nelly Furtado, and many of his musicians come from the acclaimed jazz program at the University of North Texas College of Music. He owns four other bands, which range in price point to cater to a wide demographic of wedding budgets. It’s another way that wedding music has changed; couples can approach entertainment companies, such as Kahn’s, Vali Entertainment, or Elan Artists, and choose from a variety of offerings to fit their style, taste, and budget.
“Bands are taking on the responsibility of presenting a unique footprint musically,” Rago says. “They are sitting down with the client and talking to them, finding ways to make their event special. Some even rescore music. It’s a very custom experience.”
As for event day, that’s when even the newlyweds are blown away. “People are just floored because the music is so tight,” Rago says. “People expect cheesy, and it’s not.”
It’s all a far cry from Sandler’s iconic ’90s character. “Why would someone choose to be a wedding singer?” Kahn asks. “I do it because I love singing songs that people know, that they can relate to and dance to. I love what I do, and I ensure everyone around me does too.”
More must-read stories from Fortune:
—Fortune’s 2019 40 Under 40
—Meet the A.I. landlord that’s building a single-family-home empire
—How automation is cutting into workers’ share of economic output
—Can TikTok turn 950 million downloads into a booming business?
—Digital health companies hit a new VC funding record in 2018
Subscribe to Fortune’s CEO Daily newsletter for the latest business news and analysis.
Credit: Source link
The post How This Wedding Singer Earns $1.5 Million a Year appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.
from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/how-this-wedding-singer-earns-1-5-million-a-year/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-this-wedding-singer-earns-1-5-million-a-year
0 notes
kyleelisetht · 6 years ago
Text
Artist Tmnk/NOBODY’s Artwork Values in Flux but Trending Upwards as Collectors and Dealers Offer Works for Sale After His Death. Some Things to Think About When Buying. ~KyleeliseTHT
By KyleeliseTHT ©2018
12/2/2018
Provenance is the most recognized and noteworthy term in the universe of art collection. No work of art would (or should) reach its highest value absent significant documentation of its origins, along with a record of an artwork’s journey from artist to buyer over its transaction history.
Tumblr media
Not to be confused with “appraisal,” provenance gives a deeper understanding of the artist, exhibition or publication history, subsequent collectors, and is often the main basis for art valuation.
Consider the millions paid for highly-sourced original works by Jean-Michel Basquiat juxtaposed art that is merely attributed to the artist sans records to substantiate that Basquiat created the work. Those are offered anywhere between hundreds to thousands of dollars—not millions. The big-ticket sales are based on provenance. The lower prices reflect the uncertainty when buying art that is being sold on a ‘Take my word for it’ basis.
There’s another thing, among others, that can add to the value of an artwork—its subject matter, whether a self-portrait, part of a series of note, the time period in which the artwork was created, a recurring theme, or, conversely, an unusual theme with significant meaning.
The artist Tmnk/NOBODY developed a professional presence in the art world as a street graffiti artist and creator of works on canvas, cardboard, murals, and other mediums. The internationally infamous artist, who’d earned some real creative street cred by remaking the LeBron James Miami Heat billboard and other creative defacements, died in September of 2016.
Notable, is that he exhibited in nearly every major art market, including New York, Miami, Paris, Berlin, Norway, and so on. Infamously, Tmnk/NOBODY was equally known for tagging, leaving his mark in as many cities, states, and countries as he’d traveled to show his work, plus a few places where he just happened to turn up.
Famous for his professional moniker, “ART IS MY WEAPON,” the artist was a branding genius, creating an entire portfolio of thematic links referencing his works, like his t-shirt and bandana line and the use of the words “NOBODY Cares,” which he inscribed on several of his artworks, and his iconic use of the word “LOVE”. And then there’s 5150, a police term for mentally disturbed, that the artist embedded in many of his artworks. Although “5150” in Tmnk/NOBODY’s creative universe signified other things, as well.
According to the artist’s own online-auction records, his artworks could be had for as little as five dollars and in the hundreds for the most part. Larger works sold by galleries or by the artist, himself, went from about five-hundred dollars well into the thousands. Additionally, he often gave art away to strangers and people he knew for the purpose of expanding his carefully cultivated brand, which puts his sales range as a living artist somewhere between zero dollars upwards into the several thousands.
The artist had an impressive exhibition history, and the climbing trajectory of his career was well-documented both domestically and internationally. No wonder dealers and private collectors have been feeling out the secondary market for his artworks following his death, testing the marketplace with markups three to twenty times or higher the original purchase price from the artist or his representatives.
For instance, there are two Tmnk/Nobody works for sale on eBay, today. One 9-inch by 13-inch piece titled “Love Is My Religion” was purchased from the artist in 2016 for seventy-five dollars and is listed for $275. A smaller work on carboard, “Love is My Super Human Power,” is being offered by another seller for $3,888.88. The second work is of a kid super hero—an imagined self-portrait of the artist—which was the subject of a larger, earlier work. Both pieces are from Tmnk/NOBODY’s “my two cents” series of intentionally affordable artworks.
In the time closer to the artist’s death, much larger works—some he created with collaborators—listed and sold for just over one-thousand dollars on an online website in Italy.
Now past sales records as a foundation for current pricings of Tmnk/NOBODY’s artwork have been tossed for some deserving speculation. History will show that his work was exceptionally intuitive and masterfully composed.
As demand for Tmnk/NOBODY’s artwork heats up, the presence of a signature or paintings in his style might settle the question of authenticity in lieu of real provenance. Not so! The good news is that the artist left behind a robust record of his production over the years, some of which can be searched online. And, he almost always included personal notes on cardstock with artworks that he mailed to patrons.
His own words, found in personal notes and online posts with photographs, can tell you a lot about a work—his inspiration, exhibition history, choice of materials, original pricing, and, sometimes, first ownership.
Each piece of Tmnk/NOBODY artwork has a story. Be sure that some part of it is included with your purchase. Provenance matters. And, if the artist’s prediction comes true—a very likely one—you’ll want as much provenance available to back up the highest future value for your current investment in his work.
“Didn’t collect my art? Wow…really? ~TMNK
1 note · View note