#josh beauchamp new united

[prplocks]

Poderia fazer locks do Josh Beauchamp?

<3

[leutjaneausten]

Open in app or online

March 27, 2023

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

Seven people died today in a school shooting in Nashville. Three of them were nine-year-olds. Three were staffers. One was the shooter. In the aftermath of the shooting, President Joe Biden once again urged Congress to pass a ban on assault weapons, to which today’s Republican lawmakers will never agree because gun ownership has become a key element of social identity for their supporters, who resent the idea that the legal system could regulate their ownership of firearms.

In the wake of the shooting, Representative Andrew Ogles (R-TN), who represents Nashville thanks to redistricting by the Republican legislature that cut up a Democratic district, said he was “utterly heartbroken” by the shooting and offered “thoughts and prayers to the families of those lost.”

In 2021, Ogles, his wife, and two of his three children held guns as they posed for a Christmas card with a caption that read: “The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference—they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good.”

Meanwhile, protests continue in Israel, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s attempt to hamstring his country’s Supreme Court and put the legislature in charge of judicial review has sparked fierce opposition.

Netanyahu regained power last November while he was facing criminal charges of fraud, breach of trust, and bribery. His far-right coalition put together a government and elevated two critics of the Israeli judiciary, who promptly put forward a plan of “legal reforms.”

According to Amichai Cohen and Yuval Shany in Lawfare, supporters of those changes claim that unelected judges who are part of a “liberal deep state” have too much power, often using it to pursue criminal proceedings against senior politicians, prohibit Israeli settlements on Palestinian land in the West Bank, or to refuse religious exemptions from military service for ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students.

On January 4, 2023, Netanyahu’s minister of justice Yariv Levin proposed an overhaul of the judicial system that would put Netanyahu’s slim majority—just 64 seats in the 120-member Knesset—in complete control of the country’s laws, enabling the far-right majority to avoid any checks on its power (as well as enabling Netanyahu to evade the criminal trials he faces).

But Netanyahu did not campaign on remaking the judiciary; it is the far-right members of his coalition who have made it their signature issue. Protests against the measures began almost immediately as alarmed Israelis realized the move would destroy their democracy.

The protests continued until this Saturday, when Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant warned that the massive backlash against the judicial overhaul, including more and more military members who are boycotting their training missions, threatened the nation’s military readiness. He called for a halt to the attempt to force through the changes. Two members of the coalition backed Gallant and one appeared to be wavering, thus threatening Netanyahu’s majority. The next day, Netanyahu fired Gallant.

The firing sparked massive demonstrations and widespread strikes. At first, the far-right members of Netanyahu’s coalition refused to stop their plans to overhaul the judiciary and called for their supporters to turn out to oppose the protesters, but Netanyahu apparently cut a deal with them. He has announced that the judicial reforms will be postponed while the two sides look for a compromise, and that he has agreed to the formation of a civil “national guard” the right will control. While Bethan McKernan of The Guardian called this move an empty gesture, Zach Beauchamp of Vox noted that the new paramilitary unit will be under the control of the extremist minister of national security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, who in 2008 was convicted of supporting a terrorist organization and who used to keep a photograph of a mass murderer in his living room.

Still, as Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo notes, the halt is “pretty transparently a stalling tactic,” launched in the hope that the protests will die down and the package can go forward later, although, as Marshall points out, polls show that the so-called reforms are very unpopular.

The crisis in Israel threatens the country’s relationship with the United States. During the Trump administration, Netanyahu cozied up to Trump and his Republican allies, and Israel’s continued rightward shift has alarmed foreign observers. In early March, Israel’s finance minister Bezalel Smotrich called for the state to “erase” a Palestinian town, and he has called himself a “proud homophobe” and a “fascist.” In Israel, Netanyahu’s son tweeted that the U.S. State Department is behind the protests, hoping to overthrow Netanyahu, a sentiment to which Netanyahu himself has nodded.

When Smotrich visited Washington, D.C., earlier this month, White House officials declined to meet with him, and more than ninety Democratic lawmakers wrote to Biden asking him to use “all diplomatic tools available to prevent Israel’s current government from further damaging the nation’s democratic institutions and undermining the potential for two states for two peoples.” According to Josh Lederman of NBC News, more than 300 rabbis last year said that members of Netanyahu’s coalition were not welcome to speak at their synagogues.

The threats to the Israeli judiciary threaten the nation’s economy, as billionaire and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg pointed out in a New York Times op-ed earlier this month. “Companies and investors place enormous value on strong and independent judicial systems because courts help protect them — not only against crime and corruption but also government overreach. Just as important, they protect what their employees value most: individual rights and freedoms,” he wrote.

In case anyone missed the obvious comparison between what is happening in Israel and what might transpire in the U.S., Bloomberg continued: “In the United States, our founding fathers’ insistence on checks and balances to control the tyrannical tendencies of majorities was part of their genius. Our Constitution is not perfect—no law is—but its many checks and balances have been essential to protecting and advancing fundamental rights and maintaining national stability. It was only through those safeguards that the United States has managed to withstand extreme shocks to our democracy in recent years—including a disgraceful attempt to prevent the peaceful transfer of power—without a catastrophic fracturing.”

—

Notes:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/03/27/us/nashville-shooting-covenant-school

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/27/tennessee-congressman-mass-shooting-school/

Twitter avatar for @AliVelshi

Ali Velshi

@AliVelshi

Americans should watch developments in Israel, in which a sitting prime minister, facing criminal charges of fraud, breach of trust and bribery, was returned to office, and is now attempting to pass laws that would, among other things, limit the ways in which he can be declared… https://t.co/YQ62Kh1Sm1

1:22 PM ∙ Mar 27, 2023

30,221Likes8,984Retweets

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/israel-crisis-palestinian-violence-judiciary-protests-biden-support-rcna73504

https://www.dw.com/en/benjamin-netanyahu-wins-majority-in-israeli-election/a-63643822

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2023/02/23/israels-majoritarian-nightmare-should-be-a-us-concern/

https://www.lawfareblog.com/new-israeli-governments-constitutional-law-reforms-why-now-what-do-they-mean-and-what-will-happen

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/03/25/israel-defense-minister-yoav-gallant-netanyahu/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/03/26/israel-judicial-reform-netanyahu-protests/

https://www.npr.org/2023/03/26/1166134644/benjamin-netanyahu-fires-defense-minister-yoav-gallant

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-65083776

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/more-observations-on-the-unfolding-crisis-in-israel

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-03-13/ty-article/.premium/smotrich-heads-to-paris-after-chilly-u-s-trip-but-not-at-frances-invitation/00000186-da57-d9b0-a3af-db7f4bf60000

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/ben-gvir-responds-to-bennett-fine-ill-take-down-baruch-goldsteins-picture/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/27/israel-netanyahu-judiciary-plans-halt

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/28/opinion/israel-protests-benjamin-netanyahu.html

https://www.vox.com/2023/3/27/23658430/israel-protests-netanyahu-judicial-overhaul-general-strike-democracy

https://www.timesofisrael.com/gallant-calls-to-pause-judicial-overhaul-citing-tangible-danger-to-state-security/

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-02-19/ty-article/.premium/ben-gvir-to-head-team-that-will-fight-terror-incitement-by-palestinians/00000186-6a21-dba0-a5c6-7a7dec6a0000

Drezner’s World

Israel is Going Through It Right Now.

The hard-working staff here at Drezner’s World has been reluctant to write about developments in Israel for quite a long time. That was particularly true after Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right coalition won last November’s election. Netanyahu’s cabinet elevated some…

Read more

a day ago · 28 likes · 2 comments · Daniel W. Drezner

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/05/opinion/michael-bloomberg-israel-netanyahu.html

[thisgameissonintendo]

Hello I'm new on your blog and just wanted to say I love your content (came here for Wednesday) If you are comfortable with it do you mind sharing some of your favourites in general? I hope it's not to much to ask xx

hello, welcome 🫶 i don’t know what favorites refers to here but i’m just gonna go down the character/actor route. my favorite characters are thomas magnum, tyler galpin, the sandman, ricky bowen, rafe cameron, juliet higgins and number 5. tho, i don’t necessarily make edits with all of them at the same time. magnum is a constant and it looks like tyler & ricky may be as well. if there’s a new season of obx, tua and the sandman i’ll most definitely go back and make edits with the new content.

actor-wise it’s hunter doohan, jay hernandez, joshua bassett, tom sturridge, perdita weeks, drew starkey and jenny ortega. (i like more of course but these ones stand out atm)

i’m also way too involved with musicians 😆 my favorite bands are new hope club and the vamps. i also like joshua bassett, josh beauchamp, little mix, any gabrielly, noah urrea, now united, olivia rodrigo, sabrina carpenter, dove cameron and nina chuba. (also like madison beer‘s music but not necessarily herself)

if there’s anything else you want to know feel free to send a message or another ask 😌

[audiogold]

Posted @withregram • @myanalogjournal Dancefloor Fuzz with @thejoshbeauchamp • Sound system DJ, party builder and vinyl storyteller - Josh Beauchamp can usually be found at @audiogold , forever being schooled in all things HiFi, or rigging up @rudemovementsdance , an all-night psychedelic analog dance party. Audio Gold is London’s finest emporium of used and new stereo equipment and the perfect tinkering ground for an audiophile sound system. So it was no surprise when Rude Movements came to fruition. A dance community centered around quality of sound, good food, freedom of expression and the right setting. Following in the footsteps of Mancuso’s torchbearers today, Rude Movements is a party for everyone. All are welcome, and all are loved. It exists as a temporary sanctuary in this modern world, to provide opportunities for healthy escapism, new friendships and a deeper sense of belonging. Josh is always searching for those records that take you places and creating spaces to enjoy them in. Bringing people together in DIY fashion to immerse themselves in dance and sound; all aboard the shuttle to shared consciousness. Many of Josh’s tales can be heard on his Mixcloud page. If you live in London, be sure to visit Audio Gold and check out Rude Movements if you want to dance! “For this journey I have followed some threads in my recent dance floor interests, sewn together with a few personal favorites and some inspired gems on loan from the Audio Gold family. It’s a global story, I love the fuzzy groove theme and deeper moments. Very much hope you enjoy getting down to it wherever you are in the world.” (at London, United Kingdom) https://www.instagram.com/p/CnAXEusN-sq/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[beauclaw]

★) like or reblog if you save.

@beauclaw on twitter.

[youcancallme-manny]

We cannot be friends if you don’t love this song and aren’t excited for it to come out as official video and single- 

[chakytron]

Now United - Meet Nour from Lebanon

Now United – Meet Nour from Lebanon

Now United – Meet Nour from Lebanon Category Music Description: WE ARE NOW UNITED – Meet Nour from LEBANON Follow NOW UNITED for more updates: Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/nowunited Facebook: … TopTrengingTV Hunting the most trend video of the moment, every hour every day 24/7. Youtube Video Data Published At: 2021-01-18T16:00:10Z   Tags:  [‘toptrendingtv’, ‘trend video’, ‘trend hunter’,…

[vinayv224]

Vox Sentences: Call and response

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Vox Sentences is your daily digest for what’s happening in the world. Sign up for the Vox Sentences newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox Monday through Friday, or view the Vox Sentences archive for past editions.

The White House “transcript” of the Trump-Zelensky call is released; a mountain glacier in Italy is on the verge of collapse.

A quid pro quo?

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

As President Trump promised on Twitter yesterday, the White House released a transcript — well, sort of — of the president’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in July. [Washington Post / Devlin Barrett, Matt Zapotosky, Carol D. Leonnig, and Josh Dawsey]

The five-page document was assembled by “notetakers” from the National Security Council and contains a disclaimer that it is not a word-for-word version of the conversation. [AP / Darlene Superville]

It shows that Zelensky asked Trump for an increase in military aid. Trump responded that he wanted Zelensky to do him a “favor”: investigate a theory about the Ukrainians and a Democratic email server, and investigate the Biden family’s dealings with a Ukrainian prosecutor. [Vox / Zack Beauchamp]

Zelensky claimed that he did not feel pressured to look into Biden during the call in a joint press conference with Trump this afternoon at the UN General Assembly. [US News / Paul D. Shinkman]

But Democrats see evidence in the transcripts of Trump abusing his executive privilege to solicit foreign aid in winning the 2020 presidential election. [LA Times / Chris Megerian]

Trump’s plan to quiet voices calling for articles of impeachment with the release of this transcript may have backfired — instead providing a strong piece of evidence against him. [Vox / Zack Beauchamp]

Climate threat on Europe’s highest mountain

A huge Mont Blanc glacier on the French-Italian border is on the verge of collapse, prompting authorities to close roads and evacuate towns near the mountain. [Reuters / Elisa Anzolin and Francesca Piscioneri]

The glacier, formed with some 250,000 cubic meters of ice — or 100 times the size of an Olympic-size swimming pool — is shifting at a record rate of 50-60 centimeters (16-23 inches) a day. [Telegraph / Nick Squires]

Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, in an address to the United Nations General Assembly in New York on Tuesday, warned of the perils of climate change, saying, “It’s an alarm that cannot leave us indifferent. It must shake us all and mobilize us.” [CNN / Gianluca Mezzofiore]

The Mont Blanc news comes amid some of the biggest climate protests taking place around the world, and mere days after the conclusion of the UN Climate Action Summit. Here are those events in photos. [Vox / Brian Resnick and Danielle Scruggs]

Alpine glaciers are melting and polar ice sheets are increasingly retreating as a result of global warming. National Geographic has dubbed this trend “the big thaw.” [National Geographic / Daniel Glick]

Miscellaneous

Phoebe Waller-Bridge, fresh off her Emmy wins for the comedy hit Fleabag, signed a $20 million deal a year with Amazon to create and produce more television content. [Variety / Will Thorne]

“Alexa, find me a job.” McDonald’s announced Wednesday it’s launching a new initiative called “Apply Thru,” allowing owners of Alexa and Google Assistant devices to find job postings and begin filling out their applications for the fast food chain. [The Verge / Nick Statt]

Twenty-six creators, thinkers, and scholars were named the new MacArthur fellows, earning a $625,000 stipend in recognition of their creativity and academic or professional potential. Meet them here. [NPR / Colin Dwyer]

A submarine — dubbed a “narco sub” — carrying 12,000 pounds of cocaine worth more than $165 million was captured by the US Coast Guard, authorities said. Four suspected drug smugglers who were on board were also apprehended. [CBS News / Sophie Lewis]

Verbatim

“Your fridge will beep for more cheese.” [British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, in an address to the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday, failed to mention Brexit but offered a spirited speech on future tech / AP]

Watch this: How to impeach a president

What we can learn from Reconstruction, Watergate, and the Clinton saga. [YouTube / Liz Scheltens, Carlos Waters, and Nicholas Garbaty]

We want to bring you more videos and ambitious series with the hosts you love. Join the Vox Video Lab today to support our work on YouTube.

Read more

Scientists: humans are rapidly turning oceans into warm, acidifying basins hostile to life

The burger brawl

“Heritage travel” is surging in the era of DNA testing. It has a special significance for black Americans.

Can you lessen anxiety by playing a game on your phone?

Startups are selling you pills through Instagram. Why don’t they say which ones?

from Vox - All https://ift.tt/2lE2ysG from Blogger https://ift.tt/2lNZrhJ via IFTTT

[sidneiart-blog]

OUÇA AGORA – Now United – DANA (Live) – Dreams Come True Tour, São Paulo

[quoratopstories]

When did "gun control" become synonymous with banning guns?

Ever since the Anti-Gun Liberal Leaders, with the heavily ARMED security details, have STATED their desire to ban guns:

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D – CA) does. “Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.” – Associated Press, 18 November, 1993. “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them; “Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in,” I would have done it.” “The National Guard fulfills the militia mentioned in the Second amendment. Citizens no longer need to protect the states or themselves.”– 60 Minutes on CBS, 5 February, 1995.

Senator Frank Launtenberg (D – NJ) did. “We have other legislation that all of you are aware that I have been so active on, with my colleagues here, and that is to shut down the gun shows.”

“The glowing praise of the “Austraila Solution” by Hillary Clinton suggests it.

Fmr. Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D – OH) did. “No, we’re not looking at how to control criminals … we’re talking about banning the AK-47 and semi-automatic guns.” – Constitution Subcommittee, 2 February, 1989

Vice President Joe “Buckshot” Biden (D – DE) does. “Banning guns is an idea whose time has come.” – Associated Press, 11 November, 1993

Representative Jan Schakowski (D – IL) does. “I believe…..this is my final word……I believe that I’m supporting the Constitution of the United States which does not give the right for any individual to own a handgun….” – Recorded 25 June, 2000 by Matt Beauchamp

Fmr. Representative Major Owens (D – NY) did. “We have to start with a ban on the manufacturing and import of handguns. From there we register the guns which are currently owned, and follow that with additional bans and acquisitions of handguns and rifles with no sporting purpose.”

Representative Bobby Rush (D – IL) does. “My staff and I right now are working on a comprehensive gun-control bill. We don’t have all the details, but for instance, regulating the sale and purchase of bullets. Ultimately, I would like to see the manufacture and possession of handguns banned except for military and police use. But that’s the endgame. And in the meantime, there are some specific things that we can do with legislation.”

Vermont State Mary Ann Carlson (D) does. “We must be able to arrest people before they commit crimes. By registering guns and knowing who has them we can do that. If they have guns they are pretty likely to commit a crime.”

New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) does. ” …confiscation could be an option…”

Sarah Brady, fmr. Chairman of Handgun Control Inc. (now The Brady Campaign) does. “…I don’t believe gun owners have rights.” – Hearst Newspapers, October 1997 “The House passage of our bill is a victory for this country! Common sense wins out. I’m just so thrilled and excited. The sale of guns must stop. Halfway measures are not enough.” – 1 July, 1988…“Our main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn’t matter if you have to distort the facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” – The National Educator, January 1994, pg. 3, to Fmr. Senator Howard Metzenbaum

Fmr. Chancellor of Boston University John Silber did. “I don’t believe anybody has a right to own any kind of a firearm. I believe in order to obtain a permit to own a firearm, that person should undergo an exhaustive criminal background check. In addition, an applicant should give up his right to privacy and submit his medical records for review to see if the person has ever had a problem with alcohol, drugs or mental illness . . . The Constitution doesn’t count!”

Fmr. United States Attorney General Janet “Waco” Reno does. “The most effective means of fighting crime in the United States is to outlaw the possession of any type of firearm by the civilian populace.”-- Written affidavit by Fred Diamond, 1984 B’nai B’rith meeting in Coral Gables, Florida

Deborah Prothrow-Stith, of the Office of Government and Community Programs and the Community Violence Prevention Project at the Harvard School of Public Health, does. “My own view on gun control is simple: I hate guns and I cannot imagine why anybody would want to own one. If I had my way, guns for sport would be registered, and all other guns would be banned.”

The ACLU does. “We urge passage of federal legislation … to prohibit … the private ownership and possession of handguns.”

ACLU #47.“I now think the only way to control handgun use is to prohibit the guns. And the only way to do that is to change the Constitution.” — M. Gartner, then President of NBC News, USA Today, January 16, 1992, pg. A9.

"The NRA is Right: But We Still Need to Ban Handguns," -Josh Sugarmann the executive director and founder of the VERY anti-gun Violence Policy Center (VPC). from The Washington Monthly, June 1987

Go to: http://ift.tt/2iclvvp... and when it asks for a license number, put in: 1-54-XXX-XX-XX-00725. Then Google the address, and see what you learn.

This may both surprise and enlighten you.

Read the Democrat H.R.4269 - Assault Weapons Ban of 2015 pay particular attention to the SINGLE-SHOTS and BOLT ACTIONS "Assault Weapons" the Democrats want to ban! http://ift.tt/2iJXoYn

Read other answers by

Tim Furgerson on Quora:

Gun control: Is there any logical reason why ownership of assault weapons (rifles with features that look assault-ish) is protected by law in the US?

Why are Republicans against gun control?

Why don't gun control supporters launch a stronger campaign for the same?

Read more answers on Quora. via Quora http://ift.tt/2hS2v4e

[theconservativebrief]

Over the past two days, the US president changed his mind about whether Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election. He fumed privately about the lack of progress in talks with North Korea. And he even threatened Iran with potential war.

It was just another remarkable weekend in the President Donald Trump era.

Starting on Sunday morning, Trump repeatedly bashed former President Barack Obama for failing to stop Russia’s election interference. He then proceeded to call it “all a big hoax,” implying that he didn’t believe Moscow attacked America’s electoral system. But just last week, Trump said he accepted the US intelligence community’s assessment that Russia meddled during the 2016 presidential election.

On Sunday morning, the Washington Post reported Trump was unhappy his administration has come no closer to convincing Pyongyang to give up its nuclear arsenal. That undermines the president’s public stance: As recently as last Tuesday, he said discussions with North Korea “are ongoing and they’re going very well.”

Late on Sunday night, as most people were close to sleep, Trump jolted them awake with an all-caps threat to Iran on Twitter: “NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE,” Trump tweeted. His statement was likely meant as a response to what Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said earlier on Sunday, that “war with Iran is the mother of all wars” but also that “peace with Iran is the mother of all peace.”

If you missed any of this because you wanted to enjoy a politics-free weekend, no worries. We’ll get you back up to speed.

Last Monday, Trump shocked the world by siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who said that Moscow didn’t meddle in the 2016 presidential election. The US president then spent the rest of the week trying to walk that back, insisting that, yes, he actually believed the US intelligence community when they say Russia interfered.

He undid all that work in a Sunday tweet.

So President Obama knew about Russia before the Election. Why didn’t he do something about it? Why didn’t he tell our campaign? Because it is all a big hoax, that’s why, and he thought Crooked Hillary was going to win!!!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 22, 2018

Let’s unpack this, shall we?

When Trump complains Obama didn’t stop Russian interference, he is admitting that Russia meddled in the election. That would seem to put him on the side of the US intelligence community.

But his next sentence is where it all breaks down: “Because it is all a big hoax, that’s why, and he thought Crooked Hillary was going to win!!!” That’s quite the contradiction. Trump is now effectively saying “Russia totally interfered and bad on Obama for not stopping it, but it’s actually all a hoax anyway.”

The cognitive dissonance caught the attention of certain conservative commentators:

So it’s time for the Obamans to be investigated because they knew and did nothing…also it was a hoax…but they knew…and it was a hoax…

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 23, 2018

And as for Trump’s oft-repeated complaint that Obama didn’t do anything about Russia’s interference: The Obama administration did take some measures — including privately telling Moscow officials to stop and also telling journalists that Russia stole emails from Hillary Clinton and other Democrats — but it clearly didn’t do enough to stop the Kremlin’s behavior.

It’s possible what Trump really means is that special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into possible Trump campaign collusion with Russia is a hoax, or at least a “witch hunt.” That would make sense, since Trump has repeatedly stated this opinion.

But in this case, it looks like Trump has once again brushed aside the conclusions of his intelligence community — firmly putting him back in Putin’s camp, who says that Russia didn’t interfere in the 2016 US presidential election.

Mere hours after his historic summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore on June 12, Trump tweeted that “There is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea.”

A month later, he seems much less optimistic.

According to a Sunday story in the Washington Post, Trump is upset that high-level talks with North Korea have failed to convince them to dismantle their nuclear program and seem to be going nowhere.

“Diplomats say the North Koreans have canceled follow-up meetings, demanded more money and failed to maintain basic communications, even as the once-isolated regime’s engagements with China and South Korea flourish,” write John Hudson, Josh Dawsey, and Carol Leonnig.

It’s yet another signal that North Korea isn’t serious about giving up its nuclear arsenal. Here’s just one example: Earlier this month, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo traveled to Pyongyang for the third time to continue talks about dismantling North Korea’s nuclear program. Pompeo went, in part, because North Korea promised him a meeting with Kim. But Kim never showed — and opted to visit a potato farm instead.

People familiar with Pompeo’s discussion with the North Korean politician who did show, top official Kim Yong Chol, said the North Koreans “were just messing around” and “not serious about moving forward.” The meeting went “as badly as it could have gone,” the source told CNN on July 11.

Yet on Monday morning, Trump maintained everything was just fine — and even worked in a dig at the Post for its coverage:

A Rocket has not been launched by North Korea in 9 months. Likewise, no Nuclear Tests. Japan is happy, all of Asia is happy. But the Fake News is saying, without ever asking me (always anonymous sources), that I am angry because it is not going fast enough. Wrong, very happy!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 23, 2018

(Hudson, one of the story’s reporters, quickly responded on Twitter: “We contacted the White House multiple times before the story ran.”)

Experts have warned that North Korea was unlikely to give up its nuclear program just because Trump wants them to. The Kim regime seems to see nuclear weapons as the key to its survival, mostly because it deters foreign countries, like the United States, from invading it.

So it’s not surprising that the Trump administration has made little progress. After all, previous administrations have tried and failed. It is worth noting, however, that Trump made it sound like he had solved the entire problem after his meeting with Kim — and it’s clear even he knows that’s not true.

If you’re sick of worrying about a war with North Korea, you can switch things up by focusing on a potential war with Iran.

On Sunday, Iran’s President Rouhani gave a speech to Iranian diplomats that included some pointed words for the United States.

“America should know that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace, and war with Iran is the mother of all wars,” Rouhani said. “You are not in a position to incite the Iranian nation against Iran’s security and interests.”

That address came the same day as a speech from Pompeo in California, where the secretary of state blamed the country’s ruling elite for much of the violence in the Middle East and taking money from the citizenry. “Iran is run by something that resembles the mafia more than a government,” Pompeo said. “Iranians want to be governed with dignity, accountability, and respect.”

It’s part of a purported effort by the Trump administration to oppose the Iranian government but side with the Iranian people.

[embedded content]

Rouhani’s comments, though, didn’t stop Trump from threatening a war with Iran late on Sunday night — an event that could prove catastrophic for the country’s ruling elite and citizens.

To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 23, 2018

That’s not all: National Security Adviser John Bolton followed up on Monday morning with a statement noting that “President Trump told me that if Iran does anything at all to the negative, they will pay a price like few countries have ever paid before.”

So let’s be clear: If Iran does something bad, whatever that may be, the possibility of war is on the table. After all, both Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton publicly called for airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities prior to joining the Trump administration.

My colleague Zack Beauchamp explains just how bad a war with Iran over its nuclear program would be:

Surgical strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities would only set back the program temporarily, but destroying the country’s nuclear capacity entirely would require a massive military effort. That would kill thousands of people, destroy whatever vestiges of political stability remain in the Middle East, and potentially wreak havoc on the global economy — all while likely failing to permanently end Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Iran, Beauchamp notes, would certainly respond by killing Americans in the Middle East and try to disrupt the global oil supply, much of which literally helps power the US economy.

So, yeah, not great. But that’s the scenario Trump’s tweet has brought us back to again.

I wonder what the Iranian people think about that.

Original Source -> Trump’s catastrophic foreign policy weekend, explained

via The Conservative Brief

[garynsmith]

Inman selects Ambassadors for Connect San Francisco

http://ift.tt/2oQp7qe

The Inman community is made up of the best and brightest in real estate. Connecting this diverse, enthusiastic group of real estate professionals is a big part of our mission. Why? Because together we change the industry for the better, uplifting one another and improving the consumer homebuying and selling experience.

That is a big part of our agenda each summer in San Francisco, where our community comes together at Inman Connect, a weeklong celebration of innovation, hard work, success, change and progress.

Both behind the scenes and at the forefront of Connect are the Inman Ambassadors.

Don’t miss out — register today!

Ambassadors are vibrant members of the Inman community who volunteer at each event to make introductions, help new attendees find their way and bring the spirit of connection alive.

As Connect has grown, so has Inman’s commitment to ensuring it remains a place that feels welcoming, fun, uplifting and worthwhile. That starts with a rededication to growing and evolving the Ambassador program.

This year, we’ve invited new members with fresh perspectives, energy and ideas to the group. They join some of our most steadfast supporters and longtime Ambassadors.

As the Inman community grows, we will continue to shine a bright light on the community that does so much good for the real estate industry.

We’re working to deepen connections through new events, workshops and spaces to share ideas and break the mold.

“Inman is its readers, and the Ambassadors are our volunteer leaders who connect our community with one another through their selfless contribution to Connect,” said publisher Brad Inman.

Inman Connect San Francisco 2017 takes place August 7 through 11 at the Hilton San Francisco Union Square.

Don’t miss out — register today!

Industry professionals will come from around the world to learn, network and most importantly connect with respected colleagues who are changing the industry and growing their business.

This year’s Connect will be promises to be even better than the last, delivering conversation around turning visions into realities.

Meet the 2017 Inman Connect San Francisco Ambassadors

Chavi Holm Team Lead/Broker at Team Diva Real Estate at Coldwell Banker Bain Twitter: @ChaviH

    Herman Chan Real Estate Broker at Bay Sotheby’s International Realty Twitter: @hermanity

    Sara Sutachan Industry Relations & Strategic Initiatives Manager at California Association of Realtors Twitter: @sarasutachan

  Bill Lublin CEO at CENTURY 21 Advantage Gold Twitter: @billlublin

    Nikki Beauchamp Global Real Estate Advisor at Engel & Volkers New York City Twitter: @nikkibeauchamp

  Sherry Chris CEO of Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Twitter:@sherrychris

    Jacy Reidmann VP at Amoura Productions, Photography and Video Twitter: @SocialMediaJacy

  Stacy Stateham Co-founder & VP of Marketing and Branding at BloomTree Realty Twitter: @stacystateham

    Jim Walberg Realtor at Pacific Union International Twitter: @jimwalberg

    Tiffany Kjellander CEO/Owner at BHGRE PorchLight Properties Twitter: @tkjellander

    Ben Kinney Realtor, Speaker, Innovator Twitter: @benkinney

    Tara Christianson Technology & Training Director at Century 21 Redwood Realty and Editor at Happy Grasshopper Twitter: @techwithtlc

  Josh Tucker Broker/Managing Partner at Anchor Real Estate Twitter: @LKNbroker

Mark Spain Chairman and CEO at Mark Spain Real Estate Twitter: @MarkSpainTeam

  Billy Ekofo Director of Leads Management at Century 21 Redwood Realty Twitter: @BillyEkofo

  Sam DeBord Managing Broker at Seattle Homes Group, Coldwell Banker Twitter: @SEATTLEHOME0COM

    Mauricio Umansky Co-founder/CEO, The Agency @MauricioUmansky

    Tracy Freeman Broker/Sales Associate at Coldwell Banker Westfield East Twitter: @TracyFreemanNJ

    Dolly Lenz Founder, Dolly Lenz Real Estate Twitter: @IDollyLenz

    Wendy Foreman Agent/Owner & Realtor at  eXp Realty LLC Twitter: @wendyforeman

    Stacie Staub Managing Broker at West + Main Homes Twitter: @staciestaub

      Veronica Figueroa Broker Owner/Team Leader at RE/MAX Innovation (The Figueroa Team) Twitter:@figueroateam

  Danielle Riley CEO & President at Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Prosperity Twitter: @DanielleRiley3

    Nina Dosanjh Realtor at Coldwell Banker Twitter: @ninadosanjh

  Valerie Garcia Director of Training at Re/Max INTEGRA Twitter: @valeriegarcia1

  Peter Brewer Cool Stuff Doer at That Peter Brewer Twitter: @thatpeterbrewer

    Jay Leubke Marketing Coordinator at The ART of Real Estate Twitter: @Jayluebke

      Sean Carpenter Realtor at Coldwell Banker Twitter: @SeanCarp

    Kala Laos Founder at JK Realty Twitter: @KalaLaos

    Peter Lorimer CEO/Broker at PLG Estates Twitter: @peterlorimer

    Kenny Truong Fast Agent at Climb Real Estate Twitter: @fastagent

    Blair Myers Associate Broker & Team Leader at Better Homes & Gardens Real Estate Success Twitter: @iamtheblair

      Alyssa Hellman Head Coach at Bamboo Realty Twitter: @avhellman

  Jeff Berger Realtor/Founder at NAGLREP Twitter: @NAGLREP

    Kim Colaprete Managing Broker at Team Diva Real Estate at Coldwell Banker Bain Twitter: @SeattleDivas

    Jenny Lenz Dolly Lenz Real Estate @jennyvlenz

    Joe Schutt Ambassador Lead, Broker/Co-Owner/Realtor at Unit Realty Group Twitter: @JoeSchutt

    Andrea Geller Broker at Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Twitter: @AndreaGeller

    Bob Watson, Founder of Social Media MasterMind Orange County Twitter: @TopBrokerOC

    Katie Lance Founder, Katie Lance Consulting & #GetSocialSmart Academy Twitter: @katielance

    Kathy Klingaman CEO at TopBroker Network Real Estate Twitter: @kathyklingaman

    Laurie Weston Davis Ambassador Lead, Broker/Owner/Realtor at BHGRE Lifestyle Property Partners  Twitter: @lauriewdavis

    Real estate industry professionals from around the world turn to Inman first for accurate, innovative and timely information about the business. Known for its award-winning journalism, cutting-edge technology coverage, in-depth educational opportunities, and forward-thinking events, Inman is the industry’s leading source of real estate information.

from Inman http://ift.tt/2qbfGTx via IFTTT

[ethioentertainment]

“President Bannon,” explained

In the wake of the chaos following Trump’s order banning entry into the US from nationals of seven majority-Muslim countries — and in the wake of reports that Bannon was the chief architect of the policy — the hashtag #PresidentBannon began to spread on Twitter, and images of Bannon as a puppet master pulling Trump’s strings became commonplace. A Saturday Night Live skit concluded an Oval Office session with its version of Bannon asking Trump for the president’s desk back, and Alec Baldwin as Trump responding, “Yes, of course, Mr. President.”

On Monday morning, President Donald Trump decided that there was an urgent matter he needed to clear up for the public. “I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it,” he tweeted. “Some FAKE NEWS media, in order to marginalize, lies!”

It may seem odd that the president of the United States would feel compelled to remind the country that he is actually in charge. But over the past week and a half of Trump’s young presidency, a narrative has been gaining steam in the media and among political observers that it is not Trump but in fact White House chief strategist Steve Bannon who is actually running the show.

In the wake of the chaos following Trump’s order banning entry into the US from nationals of seven majority-Muslim countries — and in the wake of reports that Bannon was the chief architect of the policy — the hashtag #PresidentBannon began to spread on Twitter, and images of Bannon as a puppet master pulling Trump’s strings became commonplace. A Saturday Night Live skit concluded an Oval Office session with its version of Bannon asking Trump for the president’s desk back, and Alec Baldwin as Trump responding, “Yes, of course, Mr. President.”

Perhaps most prominently, Time magazine put Bannon on a striking cover and dubbed him “The Great Manipulator.” Just whom he might be manipulating was left unstated.

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough cited the Time cover in a Morning Joe segment Monday as an example of how “this Steve Bannon thing just keeps coming up, people are saying ‘President Steve Bannon.’” Scarborough added that it was very unusual for a White House staffer to develop such a high profile so quickly, and though he professed to believe that “Donald Trump is the final decider,” he said that other people keep wanting to hear about Bannon’s influence. (Trump’s “I call my own shots” tweet, which came less than an hour later, may have been a direct response to this exchange, and it also calls to mind President George W. Bush’s “I’m the decider” remark.)

For some, the “President Bannon” meme is useful as a deliberate attempt to annoy a president they view as thin-skinned and egotistical. But while it’s surely going too far to say that Bannon is “the real president” — he does work for Trump and serve at his pleasure, after all — the chief strategist has indeed been remarkably influential in shaping the new administration so far. Not only are his fingerprints all over the most controversial parts of Trump’s immigration actions, but that same weekend Trump announced another order that gave Bannon a full seat on the National Security Council Principals Committee, which is unprecedented for a White House political adviser.

Furthermore, while the “powerful political aide skilled in the dark, manipulative arts” is a common trope, Bannon isn’t just any aide. His prominence is particularly noteworthy because there are indications that he is more hard-line than Trump in certain ways. Where Trump has said he loves legal immigration, Bannon has called it a “problem.” Where Trump has often been cozy with moneyed elites on Wall Street and in Hollywood, Bannon professes to despise them. Bannon has even predicted that the US will go to war in the South China Sea within five to 10 years.

Many liberals, and even many conservatives, therefore find Bannon’s apparent influence on Trump immensely disturbing. And that’s just the way Bannon likes it.

1) Who is Steve Bannon?

Bannon (left) in 2012, a few months after the death of Andrew Breitbart (pictured at back). Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times via Getty Stephen K. Bannon grew up in Virginia, served in the Navy, went to Harvard Business School, became a banker at Goldman Sachs, and eventually got very, very rich from a deal in which he got a share of royalties from the TV show Seinfeld. His wealth freed him up to pursue his own interests, first as a documentary filmmaker and then as a close associate of Andrew Breitbart, the conservative political activist who founded the website Breitbart News. After Breitbart himself died suddenly in 2012, Bannon took over the site as executive chair.

Under Bannon, Breitbart News filled a unique role in the conservative media ecosystem. The site was relentlessly critical of Obama and top Democrats, but also of top Republicans it portrayed as sellouts to powerful interests, like House Speaker Paul Ryan and his predecessor John Boehner. The site’s tone and editorial choices on racial matters are also the subject of major controversy — the site spotlights tales of lurid crimes committed by unauthorized immigrants, Muslims, and African Americans, and Bannon himself has called the site “the platform for the alt-right,” according to Mother Jones.

So when Trump launched his presidential campaign, the anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, anti-elite rhetoric he used all sounded familiar to Breitbart readers. Under Bannon, Breitbart News’s coverage became staunchly pro-Trump. Few then were surprised when, in an August 2016 shake-up, Trump brought on Bannon as his campaign CEO — this was merely the formalization of an alliance that had already existed for many months. When Trump unexpectedly won the election, he decided to reward Bannon with a top White House job. (Josh Green wrote the definitive pre–White House profile of Bannon, and Zack Beauchamp has a fuller explainer on the history of Bannon and Breitbart.)

2) Why would anyone get the idea that Bannon has a different agenda than Trump?

In mid-November, Democratic Sens. Chris Van Hollen and Jeff Merkley held a press conference to denounce Bannon’s White House appointment. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) The idea that Steve Bannon might be manipulating Donald Trump to advance his own agenda doesn’t come out of nowhere — in fact, it comes from Bannon’s own lips. As late as summer 2016, when Bannon was still at Breitbart and just months before he moved to the Trump campaign, he told a journalist that Trump was a “blunt instrument for us” and said, “I don’t know whether he really gets it or not.”

Who is the “us” there? Overall, Bannon sees himself, Breitbart, and now Trump as allies in what he calls a “global populist movement,” which is taking back the interests of “the people” against various malefactors like rapacious capitalists, open borders “globalists,” unauthorized immigrants, and radical Islamists. He’s the type of person who pontificates a lot about how “the Judeo-Christian West” is under siege, and who thinks the US and many European governments are failing to appropriately defend the interests of people born there.

The word Bannon has embraced to describe this movement is “nationalism.” Indeed, he sees himself and Trump as embarking on a conscious project to demolish the old American political camps and “build an entirely new political movement," he told Michael Wolff in November. "I'm not a white nationalist, I'm a nationalist. I'm an economic nationalist," he continued. “It will be as exciting as the 1930s, greater than the Reagan revolution — conservatives, plus populists, in an economic nationalist movement."

According to the Daily Beast’s Ronald Radosh, Bannon gave an even more grandiose statement of his motivations a few years back. He called himself a “Leninist” because “Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.” (Bannon now claims he doesn’t remember saying this.)

But despite Bannon’s denials, there are unmistakable racial and ethnic aspects to the movement he’s building, and critics argue “white nationalism” is in fact the key to his project. Bannon has often sought to drum up political support (in the form of either pageviews or votes) by mobilizing white Americans against various frightening “others” — whether they’re Black Lives Matter protesters, immigrants, or refugees.

Much of this fits quite well with Trump’s worldview. But Trump has also appointed many more traditional Republicans to his administration, and could conceivably be swayed toward more mainstream policies as a result. Bannon also seems to genuinely differ from Trump on a couple fronts. First, there’s sometimes a religious tinge to his rhetoric — he’s argued that “secularism has sapped the strength of the Judeo-Christian West to defend its ideals,” and has even taken an interest in internal Vatican disputes.

Second, while Trump says legal immigration is wonderful, Bannon views it as a “problem and thinks it needs to be cut back.” This was dramatically demonstrated in an exchange the two had on Bannon’s radio show in November 2015, in which Bannon made the false claim that most Silicon Valley CEOs were from Asia and expressed his unhappiness with that. “A country’s more than an economy. We’re a civic society,” he said.

Not just illegal immigrants but immigrants in general, Bannon seemed to believe, were sapping America’s Americanness. In this, he goes further than Trump, but he’s in alignment with several other important figures in the new administration. Most prominent among these are attorney general nominee Jeff Sessions and several former Sessions aides, including senior White House adviser Stephen Miller. Past public statements make clear that Bannon, Sessions, and Miller are all harsh critics of even legal immigration. In some tellings, they are frequently pitted against more traditional Republicans in administration disputes.

3) What is Bannon’s White House job?

It’s hardly unprecedented for a president to give a political adviser a top job, as George W. Bush did for Karl Rove and Barack Obama did for David Axelrod. But recent incoming presidents have tended to designate one chief of staff who is indisputably in charge.

Not Trump. In a November press release, the Trump transition announced that Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus would be chief of staff — but that Bannon would fill the newly created position of “chief strategist.” Priebus and Bannon, the press release said, would work as “equal partners.” And yet Kremlinologists couldn't help noticing that Bannon’s name was listed first.

Bannon, it should be noted, fits the stereotype of the sinister political adviser to a T —and even seems to revel in it. “Darkness is good,” he told Wolff. “Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That's power.” Note that Bannon said this after the election and his appointment to a top White House job. (These comments are why Saturday Night Live portrayed him as the Grim Reaper in its recent skit.)

But as chief strategist, Bannon is more than just a political adviser. He’s taken on a major role in policy and is, by most accounts, the leading force in crafting the Trump administration’s agenda — especially the series of White House–issued executive orders with which Trump began his presidency. “Mr. Bannon has rushed into the vacuum, telling allies that he and Mr. Miller have a brief window in which to push through their vision of Mr. Trump’s economic nationalism,” the New York Times’s Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman report.

4) So where did “President Bannon” come from?

As the transition proceeded, many top White House positions and Cabinet jobs went to traditional Republicans rather than Bannon-esque outsiders, suggesting to some observers that the steady hand of Priebus was at the helm and that the Trump administration might actually end up being surprisingly normal.

That narrative exploded on January 27, Trump’s seventh full day in office. On that day, Trump issued the executive order meant to block all refugees, and nationals of seven majority-Muslim countries, from entering the US for several months.

Chaos ensued. Hundreds of people who had been previously cleared to enter the US were detained at airports around the country or prevented from boarding their flights to the US at all. Shockingly, the administration initially applied the entry ban to green card holders too, even though many of them had lived and worked in the US for years. Thousands turned out to protest, even many Republicans started to criticize the order, and a series of lawsuits soon brought the policy to a screeching halt.

The blame game that ensued during and after all this made clear the order was a Steve Bannon production. A set of reports described the order as crafted by Bannon and Miller with minimal input from the relevant agencies. One of its most objectionable features — the ban on entry for green card holders — was personally dictated by Bannon and Miller over the Department of Homeland Security’s objections, according to CNN’s Evan Perez and Pamela Brown.

Furthermore, it turned out that Bannon had a starring role in the other executive action Trump signed alongside the immigration order that Friday. This order gave Bannon a permanent seat on the Principals Committee of the National Security Council, placing him among the president’s top foreign policy advisers — an unprecedented role for a political hand.

Thrush and Haberman report that Trump was angry afterward because he “was not fully briefed” on that order’s details, and that it was an even “greater source of frustration to the president than the fallout from the travel ban.” (However, Time’s Zeke Miller has his own source saying that Trump was in fact briefed on Bannon’s new role.) In any case, the reports on Bannon’s role in the immigration order converged with this NSC order, and the “President Bannon” meme was born, making him a sort of combination Dick Cheney/Karl Rove figure in the minds of liberals.

5) What’s next for Bannon in the White House?

The fallout from the travel ban controversy has apparently led to Bannon being reined in somewhat. Both the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post report Trump has clarified to his staff that Priebus is his top aide and that policy changes have to go through him and through a more rigorous vetting process.

By all accounts, though, Bannon remains very influential, and there’s no real talk of him being on the outs with Trump — not yet, at least. Indeed, Bannon and Trump have come a long way together. They share similar pugilistic instincts and a willingness to flout the political class’s conventional wisdom. Plus, it’s understandable if Trump places a great deal of stock in Bannon’s political instincts, since Bannon did oversee a campaign that put him in the White House despite the predictions of practically every expert.

But Bannon will only continue to keep that influence if Trump is satisfied with how his presidency is going. And while the strategy of constantly throwing red meat to the base worked well to boost Breitbart News’s traffic numbers and to win Trump the election, it has not worked so well when it comes to governance. All it has done so far is earned Trump record-low job approval for a new president.

So at some point, Trump may have to decide whether holding on to the loyalty of Bannon’s movement is really enough. Perhaps he might decide he’d prefer trying to convert some new voters to his side. And if he does opt for that route, Steve Bannon may no longer be so useful to him.

[chakytron]

Now United - Lean On Me (Official Music Video)

Now United – Lean On Me (Official Music Video)

📺 Trendletter: Music Now United – Lean On Me (Official Music Video) Description: Now United Presents: ‘Lean On Me’ Filmed in: Abu Dhabi, UAE #NowUnitedLeanOnMe Follow NOW UNITED for more updates: Instagram: … TopTrengingTV Hunting the most trend video of the moment, every hour every day 24/7. Youtube Video Data Published At: 2021-01-15T16:00:11Z   Tags:  [‘toptrendingtv’, ‘trend video’, ‘trend…

[chakytron]

Now United dancing to ‘Savage Love’ Savage Love… story with cereal. Mixing dance and breakfast is the best combo to wake up in the morning! This is how we wake up in our ...

[chakytron]

Now United Girls Dance to "How You Like That" by BLACKPINK

Now United Girls Dance to "How You Like That" by BLACKPINK

📺 Trendletter:

Now United Girls Dance to "How You Like That" by BLACKPINK

Ha, how you like that?! ❤️ We can’t stop dancing to this BLACKPINK track! #MoveMoreAtHome and dance with us in your #RexonaDanceStudio Song: How …

Stay updated on the main trends in the world. On TopTrendingTV The best TV trends. Working for you, because we care about you.