#jim diminutive for james

[depressedtheatrekiddo]

Dio diminutive for Diomedes, but sometimes people call me Sofia.

Cool, I love it.

I had to do it. I'm so so sorry. I'm so fucked up.

[favvn]

The Conscience of the King + Mirror, Mirror

It's interesting to note that Bones is the link between these two scenes. Spock gives him the information about Tarsus IV since Jim refuses to speak of his past. In the Mirror Universe, Bones is with Jim when they learn that Mirror Kirk is responsible not only for killing his captain and destroying a whole planet but that this Kirk has killed 5,000 colonists on a planet named Vega IX. And to have the camera show Bones' reaction to Vega IX instead of Jim's response? What a way to recall The Conscience of the King and place the audience with Bones as they hear news of a massacre that chillingly parallels Tarsus IV.

Also, I used these scenes not just for the exposition but also because there's a delightful swapping of both the placement of Kirk's name in the scenes alongside the role reversal. In other words, in The Conscience of the King, the scene reveals that Jim Kirk is the survivor of a massacre, and it ends with the use of his name, albeit in its diminutive, nickname form (Jim rather than James). Whereas in Mirror, Mirror, the scene begins with Jim's full name and rank title, and it reveals that he is the one committing the massacre. The two scenes not only recall each other, but they show the other's reverse as if looking through a mirror.

[glisten-inthedark]

Stranger Things Names and Their Meanings

So I did some digging, and I found some of the names and last names of the characters of Stranger Things and how some of them can possibly connect to their arcs, so I figured why not share what I learned.

I sincerely hope y'all like and reblog this like your life depended on it because it took me like 500 hours to compile this, so please help a girl out lmao.

The Byers

Byers can have various meanings, but the most common one is a topographic meaning which is "someone who lived by a cattle shed"

William - It comes from the Old High German name Wilhelm or Willahelm, which is a combination of the words wil (will or desire) and helm (protection). It means "resolute protector" or "strong-willed warrior"

Jonathan - The name Jonathan is a Hebrew name that means "Gift of God" and it comes from the Hebrew word Yonatan.

Joyce - Joyce comes from the Old French name Josse, which comes from the Latin name Iudocus, the Latinized form of the Breton name Judoc, which means "lord". It also comes from Middle English, from the word joise, which means rejoice.

The Wheelers

Wheeler as a last name is an English occupational name that comes from Old English and means "one who makes or uses wheels".

Michael - The name Michael is derived from the Hebrew word Mikha'el which means "who is like God?" or "A gift from God".

Michael is also the name of one of the seven archangels. He was the leader of angels and the army of God and led the battle against Satan in the Bible.

Nancy - The name Nancy means "grace, favored, or pure".

Karen - Of Danish origin that means "pure"

Ted - Can be a diminutive of two names "Edward or Theodore". If his name is a diminutive of Edward - the name comes from the Old English name Ēadweard, which is made up of the words ēad meaning "wealth, fortunate, or prosperous" and weard meaning "guardian or protector" - which in short means that means wealthy guard.

Theodore - is of Greek origin and means "Divine Gift"

Holly - Of English origin, means "plant with red berries"

The Sinclairs

The name comes from the Latin word clarus and is derived from the French name de Saint-Clair. It may also be a habitational name for someone from a place named after the dedication of its church to St. Clarus. It means "pure, renowned, or illustrious".

Erica - of Old Norse origin that means "ever powerful" or "eternal ruler"

Lucas - The name comes from the Latin verb lucere, which means "to shine". So the name means "bringer of light".

The Creels

Likely an Americanized version of the German names Kriel or Krüll. So most likely comes from the habitational name of a place called Kriele near Rathenow (Brandenburg).

 Victor -  It comes from the Latin word vincere, which also means "to conquer". It means "conqueror".

Henry - The name Henry comes from the Old Frankish name Heimeric, which is a combination of the words haima- meaning "home" and rīk- meaning "ruler". So it means "home ruler" or "ruler of home".

Alice - of German origin that means noble and exalted. It is a short form of the Old French name Alis, that is derived from the Old High German name Adalhaidis. The name is made up of the Proto-Germanic words aþala-, meaning "noble", and haidu-, meaning "appearance; kind".

Alice is also the name of the famous character in the Lewis Carroll novel (Alice in Wonderland).

Virginia - It comes from the Roman names Verginius and Virginius, and the Latin word Virgo, which means "maiden". So the name means "maid, pure, virgin".

The Hoppers

The surname Hopper has multiple meanings:

English occupational name: From the Middle English word hoppen, which means "to dance, hop, leap". This name was used for a dancer. 

English topographic name: From the Middle English word hopper, which was used in Sussex and Kent to describe someone who lived in a remote place, such as an enclosed piece of land in a marsh. 

Jim - Most likely a diminutive for the name James - The name is derived from the Hebrew name Jacob, which means "supplanter" or "holder of the heel". In Hebrew tradition, James may mean a man who is in control of his own actions and will.

Jane - The name Jane comes from the Hebrew name Yochanan and it means "Yahweh is gracious" or "Yahweh* is merciful".

*Yahweh is the Hebrew name of the biblical God of the old Israel.

The Munsons

The last name is an English patronymic that means "son of Mund*".

*Old English and Old Norse: In Old English and Old Norse, mund means "hand" or "protection".

Eddie - Most likely a diminutive for Edward, Edmund, or Edgar - all names can mean "wealthy protector" or "wealthy spear"

Wayne - comes from an Old English word that means "wagon driver".

The Hendersons

It is of Scottish origin and it means "Son of Henry".

Dustin -  comes from the Old Norse name Þórsteinn, which is made up of the words Þórr meaning "thunder" and stein meaning "stone".

It means "Thor's stone" or "thunderstone".

Claudia - Latin origin that means "lameness" or "enclosure".

The Mayfields

It's an English habitational name that means "strong one's field".

Maxine - It comes from the Latin word maximus, which means "greatest" or "largest". 

Other Characters

Steve Harrington

The last name Harrington has multiple meanings and origins and it signifies "From stony grounds": 

English - The name Harrington is a habitational name that comes from multiple places in England. The name comes from Old English words, with hring meaning "stony" and tn meaning "settlement" or "enclosure". The name Harrington may mean "from the stony ground". 

Irish - Harrington is an Anglicized form of the Gaelic surnames Ó hArrachtáin and Ó hIongardail. Ó hArrachtáin means "descendant of Arrachtán", which comes from the Irish word arrachtach meaning "mighty" or "powerful". Ó hIongardail means "descendant of Iongardal". 

Steve -  of Greek origin that means "wreath of honor", and "crown".

Billy Hargrove

Hargrove - It is an English habitational name that means "a grove of hares".

Billy - A diminutive from William, that comes from the Old High German name Wilhelm or Willahelm, which is a combination of the words wil (will or desire) and helm (protection). It means "resolute protector" or "strong-willed warrior"

Robin Buckley

Buckley - From the Old English words bucc or bucca, which mean "buck, male deer" or "he-goat", and lēah, which means "woodland clearing" 

Robin - is of Germanic origin and means "bright" and "famous one".

Jason Carver

Carver - Occupational name from the Middle English word kerver, which means "one who cuts or carves (something)". It was especially used to describe someone who carved wood, such as a carpenter or sculptor of wooden images.

Jason - It has multiple meanings, including: Greek - which Means "healer" and comes from the Greek word iaomai, which means "to heal". In Greek mythology, Jason was a hero who led the Argonauts on a quest for the Golden Fleece. 

Hebrew: Means "the Lord is salvation"

Chrissy Cunningham

Cunningham - The surname Cunningham has multiple origins, including Scottish and Irish:

Scottish -The name may come from the Gaelic word cuinneag, which means "milk pail", and the Saxon word ham, which means "village". 

Irish - The name may come from the Gaelic surname Ó Cuinneagáin, which means "descendant of Cuinneagán". 

Chrissy - This can be a nickname for the names Christina or Christine. The name of Latin origin means "follower of Christ".

The name Christine is also the name of the main character of the novel "The Phantom of the Opera" by Gaston Leroux which was first published as a serial in 1909. The novel follows the story of Christine Daaé, who was raised in the Paris Opera House and after starts listening to a voice, learns how to sing.

Martin Brenner

Brenner - From the Middle High German word Brennen, which means "to burn". 

Martin - hat means "of Wars" or "of war" and comes from the Latin name Martinus. Martinus is a late form of the name of the Roman god Mars, who was the god of war and fertility. 

Sam Owens

Owens - Welsh:  A patronymic name meaning "son of Owen" or "descendant of Owen". The Welsh name Owen comes from the personal name Owain, which is related to the Latin name eugenius and means "noble" or "well-born". 

Sam - Diminutive for Samuel is a Hebrew name that means "God has heard" or "The name of God".

Argyle

It derives from a region in Scotland known as Earre Ghàidheal or Argyll.

Barbara Holland

Holland - A habitational name from Holland, a division of Lincolnshire, or from one of the eight villages in England with the same name. The name comes from the Old English words hōh meaning "ridge" and land meaning "land".

Barbara - name of Greek origin that means "stranger" or "foreign" and it comes from the Greek word barbaros, which had the same meaning.

[schn-tgai-saavik]

List of nicknames for Saavik from different members of the enterprise crew

Spock:

Saavikam (Vulcan parental mark of endearment added to her name)

T'kam'la (Vulcan word for Student cherished as a daughter or son)

Ko-fu (Vulcan word for Daughter. Not really a nickname)

James T Kirk:

Savvy (The compromise for her to call him Jim when he's not in command was for her to get her own diminutive nickname, hence, Savvy)

Dr. McCoy:

Honey (called her that in The Pandora Principle while trying to get her to sickbay)

Snap pea (like the vegetable, used as an endearment, he decided it was much better than little hobgoblin. He calls his own daughter sweet peach so it works too. )

Nyota Uhura:

Miss Saavik (she likes being called Mr. Saavik, but also enjoys the touch of femininity that Uhura brings when she calls her that)

Montgomery Scott:

Mr. Spock's wee Vulcan lassie (self explanatory)

[lichqueenlibrarian]

Ael: what’s your given name? They are Significant in Romulan Culture.

Jim: James, but the diminutive is Jim-

Ael:

Jim: …………..

Ael, sliding down a bulkhead crying actual tears: No, no it’s …. *wheezing* totally a fine name… Jim *chokes laughing*

[kernblanskis]

Jimbo's full name would be James. (Jimbo is a diminutive like Jim or Jimmy)

With Ned we have these possible variants:

-Edward.

-Edmund.

I sincerely wish Ned's full name was: Edwar Gerblansky.

Although if it were… Edmund Gerblansky. He would be pretty funny too.

Imagine the whole town hearing Ned referred to as Edmund. and Randy shouting: ''Wait wait…. NED!!! Your name is Edmund!? Oh god! And does Jimbo know?''' (we already know what Randy is like and how fond he is of making a scandal of everything🤣🤣🤣)

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

BY CHAUNCEY DEVEGA

Ron DeSantis is not a "mini-Trump" or some other diminutive. He is much more dangerous. Donald Trump has no "ideology" beyond megalomania and a deep desire to be an American god king. By comparison, DeSantis is far more intelligent and devious; he is an ideological fascist and racial authoritarian.

In a recent essay at Raw Story, Thom Hartmann summarized the danger to American democracy and society embodied by DeSantis:

Historians and political observers have been predicting that America would get our very own Mussolini ever since the days of Barry Goldwater. And there's been no shortage of candidates: bribe-taking Nixon; Central American fascist-loving Reagan; Gitmo torturing and war-lying Bush; and, of course, Trump.

But with Ron DeSantis, we may finally be facing an all-American politician who has Mussolini's guile, ruthlessness, and willingness to see people die to advance his political career, all while being smart and educated enough to avoid the easily satirized buffoonishness of Trump.

DeSantis and other Republican fascists have proclaimed Florida to be a bastion of "freedom" and "liberty." In reality, Florida is now a laboratory for fascism. As part of his authoritarian project, DeSantis is enforcing thought crime laws that forbid the teaching of AP African-American studies in high school and other courses and programs across Florida's school system (including at the college and university level) that examine questions of power, race and systemic inequality. DeSantis and his agents recently declared that the AP African-American studies course was inappropriate and will not be taught in Florida's schools because it has "no educational value" and is "indoctrinating" (white) young people. DeSantis and his regime's thought crime attacks on African-American studies are Orwell's "1984" meets "Birth of a Nation."

The purpose of DeSantis' thought crime laws is to intimidate and terrorize all teachers, educators, librarians, and others who are committed to education, critical thinking, and the truth in Florida (and beyond). In DeSantis' Florida — and soon to be across "red state" America if he and the other fascist Republicans get their way — there will be censors who review books and other material for thought crimes and other "dangerous" ideas that are contrary to the interests of conservatives. These censors and party officials and their designated agents will also rewrite history – and reality itself – to fit the demands of the regime. The public will no longer be able to discern truth from lies and fantasies from facts and fiction. The subversion and destruction of reality, facts, and the truth are a precondition for, and one of the primary ways that fascist and other authoritarian regimes obtain and keep power.

DeSantis' goal is to make America into a new Jim Crow Christofascist plutocracy. Donald Trump and Trumpism were just intermediate stops on that evil journey.

This is the power of censorship: people quickly learn to police their own behavior and that of their family, friends, neighbors, and yes, strangers. The public's intellectual, creative, ethical, and moral lives quickly become impoverished. The result is the ideal fascist authoritarian subject: a compliant person who does not resist.

Here is a partial list of the dozens of scholars, authors, and other public thinkers whose work has now been declared "illegal" and a "thought crime" by DeSantis and his agents and subsequently marked for removal from the AP African-American Studies course:

Kimberlé Crenshaw

Angela Davis

bell hooks

Ta-Nehisi Coates

Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor

Nell Irvin Painter

Manning Marable

Cathy Cohen

Henry Louis Gates, Jr.

James Cone

Nikki Giovanni

Barbara Fields

These are not just names on a banned books list. These are real human beings who are committed to helping the public and their students be engaged and responsible members of a larger community and to develop critical thinking skills that they can use to challenge and interrogate Power with the goal of making a better, more just, and truly democratic society.

I personally have interviewed, been in dialogue with, enjoyed the company of, had meals with, or otherwise interacted with a good many of these "banned" authors and scholars. I and many others have greatly benefitted from their scholarship, wisdom, time, and concern.

Why are DeSantis and his agents (in Florida and across the country) targeting African-American studies and other such programs?

There are many reasons.

The Black Freedom Struggle is one of the most successful pro-democracy resistance movements in American (and world) history. DeSantis and the other Republican-fascists and their forces do not want these lessons to be known, learned, or otherwise disseminated. DeSantis is working to create a type of "regime of knowledge" where Black, brown and other marginalized people's triumphs and experiences are outright erased and/or grossly distorted as a way of literally removing their personhood and existence. History has repeatedly shown that "thought crimes," banned books and other forms of intellectual violence are precursors to and do the work of interpersonal and intergroup violence on a large scale by the State, and those empowered to act in its name, against those deemed to be "the enemy."

In all, Power intersects with and is an extension of knowledge production. And knowledge is not "neutral." Philosopher Michel Foucault explained as much. "There is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations." Foucault also explained that "Truth is linked in a circular relation with systems of power which produce and sustain it."

DeSantis attended Yale for his undergraduate degree. In all likelihood, he encountered the work of Foucault during his studies there. Now DeSantis is putting Foucault's powerful insights to work in ways contrary to their original intent.

In a recent interview at The New Yorker, contributing writer Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor spoke with historian Robin D.G. Kelley about DeSantis' thought crimes regime and the targeting of African-American studies. Both Professor Taylor's and Professor Kelley's work was purged from the Advanced Placement African-American studies course. Kelley's comments merit being quoted at length:

There's two levels. One is that it's about Ron DeSantis possibly running for President. I think that's the most important thing, because, no matter what we think about DeSantis and his policies, we know he went to Yale University, and majored in history and political science with a 3.7 G.P.A., which means that he was at one of the premier institutions for history. That's why I get frustrated when people say he needs to take a class. He took the class. He knows better. He knows that the culture wars actually win votes. He's trying to get the Trump constituency.

So I think this is about Ron DeSantis wanting to run for President. But I also think that the focus on Florida occludes a bigger story. As you know, this goes back to the Trump years—well before Trump, but let's just talk about the Trump years—the attack on the 1619 Project, Chris Rufo's strategy of turning critical race theory into an epithet by denying it any meaning whatsoever. And creating a buzzword. That's actually a strategy that has nothing to do with the field of African American studies; it has everything to do with vilifying a field—attacking the whole concept of racial justice and equity. So, to me, if DeSantis never banned the class, we would still be in this situation. And although it is true that a number of states did accept the pilot program for the A.P. class, some of those same states have passed, or are about to pass, laws that are banning or limiting what they're calling critical race theory. So there is a general assault on knowledge, but specifically knowledge that interrogates issues of race, sex, gender, and even class.

It's an ongoing struggle to roll back anything that's perceived as diminishing white power. They want to convince white working people—the same white working people who have very little access to good health care and housing, whose lives are actually really precarious, as they move from union jobs to part-time, concierge labor to make ends meet—that somehow, if they can get control of the narrative inside classrooms, their lives would be better. Racism actually damages all of our prospects and futures.

I don't think it's an accident that the people who are targeted are you, Angela Davis, myself, bell hooks. To say that we're not radical would be a lie. What does radical actually mean? What it means, what Black studies is about, is trying to understand how the system works and recognizing that the way the system works now benefits a few at the expense of the many. It's easy to allow someone to come in, in the name of Black studies, and say, "We're going to talk about ancient Africa, and the great achievements of the Kush of ancient Egypt." That's not a threat—not as much as the idea of critical race theory saying that, no matter what policies and procedures and legislation are implemented, the structure of racism, embedded in a capitalist system, embedded in a system of patriarchy, continues to create wealth for some and make the rest of our lives precarious. Precarious in terms of money, precarious in terms of police violence, precarious in terms of environmental catastrophe, precarious in many, many ways. And I think people could agree with me that that's why we do this scholarship: because we're trying to figure out a way to make a better future. You know, that's the whole point. And if that's subversive, then say it, but it's definitely not indoctrination, because indoctrination is a state that bans books.....

[T]he subject of African American studies, even before it was called that, has been not just the condition of Black people but the condition of the country. And not just narrating that oppression and understanding it, and not just trying to think about ways to move beyond it—to transcend it, to come up with strategies to try to live—but also understanding what's wrong with this country, with the system.

We're not just interrogating our lives, we're interrogating knowledge production itself.

Dangerous thinking is a good thing and those with power want to socialize us into learned helplessness so that we will not see (and achieve) the radical possibilities of a true social democracy.

Years ago, when I was in high school and then college, I was lucky enough to have very generous teachers who took me on trips to conferences and other events at leading universities and institutions such as the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture. In fact, I was very lucky to have attended several conferences where Yosef Ben-Jochannan ("Dr. Ben"), who was one of the founders of African Studies, was the featured speaker. Those years that saw the Million Man March(es), debates about the merits of multiculturalism, diversity and "affirmative action" at America's colleges and universities, boiling ethnic, racial and class tensions in Los Angeles and New York's Crown Heights and Howard Beach neighborhoods (among others), the golden age of Hip Hop Music and Culture, and so many other political and cultural formations and events. It would be an understatement to say that those years were quite an exhilarating time to be a young black politically engaged person in America.

In so many ways, I am very much a product of that time period.

I learned that I have no taste for racial chauvinism; such beliefs are the mind killer. I also came to the conclusion that American and Western society is profoundly sick with white supremacy and racism. Those forces will likely bring the ultimate destruction of American society and its so-called democracy.

A more humane and good society are possible if we want it badly enough on both sides of the color line. Racism and white supremacy are a choice. America is structured around such forces and too many white Americans and others are deeply invested in such an arrangement of things -- even if it causes them great harm. DeSantis and the larger white right are using thought crimes and other tools of censorship and intimidation as weapons to limit how we conceptualize freedom, democracy, justice, and the boundaries of the possible. DeSantis and those of his ilk wouldn't be trying to ban books and authors (and by implication whole groups of people) if they were not deeply afraid of them – and the possibilities of achieving a more democratic and free and humane society.

[brionysea]

the name of el's father wasn't shown on her birth certificate before the snow ball so i think i can safely rule out the possibility of hopper's legal name being jim hopper

there are a few double name situations in stranger things (eg. billy and will both being called william) but i only just realised that there are two people named james. one is hopper (jim = diminutive of james) and the other is troy's friend who got cold feet and said he didn't think mike jumping off the quarry was a good idea

the scene with the second james was the pay off for the scene where the first james (hopper) stopped callahan from leaning over too far and set up, through demonstrating an understanding of physics ("i told you, physics," says mike), that anyone who falls off that cliff dies. they really drove this home with hopper's theory about how will died after finding the fake body in the quarry as well

i'm sure this doesn't indicate anything about the nature of hopper and mike's relationship or the fate hopper is attempting to protect mike from (<- lying)

okay wait i have. an idea. i need to check something

[if-not-now-tell-me-when]

I'm a nerd for name meanings. Such as Jim Hopper's. Jim is a diminutive form of James, which means "supplanter," or replacer. Jim supplanted - replaced - El's incredibly manipulative and abusive father figure, as well as becoming like a father figure for Will and Jonathan.

[keeley-jones]

Hello sorry to drop into your ask box with another ridiculous ted lasso take but I’ve recently become obsessed with the fact that Jamie goes by a diminutive form of James in order to distance himself from his father because it implies that in a darker timeline AFC Richmonds star striker could have been named Jim Tartt

No need to apologize, I love getting asks! Drop your thoughts in my ask box anytime :)

First of all, if you know how I feel why would you say that :(

Second of all, the name Jamie...just fits him? So well? Like with how experimental and sometimes...unique Jamie's style is (I am going to burn that Icon hat but Jamie's headbands and bomber jackets are my beloveds), how he's still so young to have accumulated so much soccer stardom, how he does the tongue thing™️ and enjoys being a prick on the field and goofing off with the team, he's just such a Jamie. Can you honestly imagine him as James or *laughs* Jim? Jim Tartt? It just doesn't fit his vibe at all, but then again neither does James. Jamie really is the best iteration of his birth name for who he is as a person, and I like thinking it's what his mom called him and even as he got older, he clung to it because, like you said, it was not only a way for him to distance himself from his father, but to carve out his own place as his own person, Jamie Tartt, not James Tartt Jr., on and off the pitch.

[travsd]

David Wayne: Bantamweight from Broadway

David Wayne: Bantamweight from Broadway

I first became aware of David Wayne (Wayne James McMeekan, 1914-95) from his role as Jim Hutton’s dad on the very fun mystery series Ellery Queen (1975-76). Over the years I caught him in dozens of other performances, old and new, and always liked him and the particular little niche he seemed to occupy. He was always distinctive enough to be memorable. A diminutive but wiry guy, his parts often…

[a-froger-epic]

I think his name was Seamus or Seumas, (which is Irish for James). So, Jim is just a diminutive. Hope that helps!

Oh! No way, I actually did not know Seamus was Irish for James! I thought they were different, unrelated names. That is very interesting, thank you!

[caeloservare]

What sort of nicknames does the General accept? Does he prefer to be called James/Jimmy/Jim/Jimbo/something else? Are certain nicknames okay for certain people but not for others?

"None, thank you."

// Just don't ask his opinion and call him whatever you want, dear anon~ c;

Jimmy doesn't like nicknames nor fraternization, so he rolls only by surname and the title. Friends (preferably close ones) are welcomed to use his first name. Students are invited to use "James" as well, but when talking directly to him, "sir" is prefered. It is good manners to keep a little distance and tad bits of formal language. He absolutely hates all the diminutives, nicknames and other forms. I'm just terrible gremlin of a mun and I call him Jimbo Himbo XD

I think that if anything, he's mostly used to "Jimmy" thanks to years of Qrow calling him that. He can almost ignore that one. Almost.

So like, go ham! :D Lately my fav fandom version is "Dadmiral Ironwood", it cracks me up. (Btw add Jamie to the list ;> Spike calls him that! He hates it, it's wonderful!)

[dorkery]

Speaking objectively, diminutive names are a very cute phenomenon.

Like, Jim instead of James. Charlie instead of Charles. Morrie instead of Maurice. It's also almost consistently the same diminution in English.

Malay does this as well (and so does Indonesian, but differently) - Lim instead of Halim, Ita instead of Rozita, Mah instead of Rahimah, Jiji instead of Azizi, Shah instead of Shahrizal - although it seems like Malay tends to take diminutive from the last syllables of a name it's not consistent and varies from person to person (I have no idea what Atan is a diminutive for - Along, Angah and Asu/Acu (like aachoo) are nicknames that correspond to birth order: Eldest, Middle, Youngest )

Indonesian nicknames from what I recall are like, Nana (from Safana), Fira (from Safira), Vivi (pronounced Fifi, can't remember her actual name), Diba (from Hadba), etc.

Compare to other languages where you add a word after a name to denote relationship and/or cuteness (I'm thinking of the Japanese chan and the jan in a bunch of languages like Turkish, Farsi, Pashto, etc)

I'm not sure how many cultures have the custom to mixing up a name to make it cuter or to mark familiarity.

Thai DEFINITELY does this A LOT bc their names are quite long but I'm not sure what the convention is bc sometimes it's completely unrelated to the actual name, but not all the time.

[ebaeschnbliah]

CHANGING  OF  THE  GUARD

________________________________________________________________

A metaphorical reading of Sherlock BBC, The Sign of Three (and beyond)

The beginning of Sherlock BBC, The Sign of Three, really leaves no doubt what the theme of its story is about. When the eye of the camera zooms slowly in on Speedy’s and the famous black door with the number 221 in Baker Street, it seems to take it’s path right through a literal wood of pointy, black spears. Fences built of iron spears that guard the place..

It starts with a row of spears in the forground. When those get blurry, even more spears from midfield move into focus. Finally the camera reveals spears also in the background. That makes three levels of spears, one might say.

Three levels of spears stand like guardians in front of 221b Baker Street. Could those three levels symbolize the three stabbing victims of The Sign of Three? After all, each one of the three characters is depicted as guard, as protector ... and each one of them gets stabbed. 

TBC below the cut ...

Stephen Bainbridge 

He is a Private in the Household Guard of the Queen. The Grenadier Guards is an infantry regiment of the British Army. The current regiment is known as the 1st Regiment of Foot Guards … ’Every foot soldier bears the mark’  (Soo Lin, TBB). How surprising is it that the ‘East’ zooms in on Bainbridge before he gets stabbed by Jonathan Small? 

Also … the gesture of the woman is interesting. Two Vs make a W (or a M … depends on the turning). It also lets me think of Culverton Smith’s W-gesture in TLD, in the short clip with the man disguised as cock (x).

Modern Grenadier Guardsmen wear a cap badge of a "grenade fired proper" with seventeen flames (x). Foot soldiers linked to exploding grenades … what a lovely coincidence, especially regarding the ‘passions’ grenade from TFP. :)

When the changing of the guards takes place, Bainbridge is already wounded and slowly dying. He got stabbed before the changing.

The name Stephen is of Greek origin and means ‘crown’ and ‘that which surrounds’. Saint Stephen was stoned to death and is regarded as the very first Christian martyr. 

Another little detail caught my attention as well. Just a word used twice to describe a person. 

SHERLOCK: “Elite Guard.” JOHN: Forty enlisted men and officers. SHERLOCK: Why this particular Grenadier? Curious.

And in TRF Sherlock sais:

SHERLOCK: This little boy; this particular little boy ... who reads all of those spy books. What would he do? JOHN: He’d leave a sign?

Max Bruhl left a sign. Stephen Bainbridge wrote a note. Not much of a difference, I think.

Guardsmen   Max and Claudette

 James Sholto

He is a retired Major of the Fifth Northumberland Fusiliers and Captain John Watson’s old commanding officer. A decorated war hero but not to everyone. Something went wrong when he led a team of new recruits into battle. ‘They all died’ (just like AGRA). Major Sholto, badly wounded, was the only survivor. Press and families gave him hell. Deaththreats and hate almost turned him into a recluse, into a most unsociable man, who spends his retirement way out in the middle of nowhere.

I’m quite sure this has been mentioned before, the 5th Northumberland Regiment on Foot (’foot soldiers’ too) still uses their ancient badge … St George killing the dragon (x)   Every quiver of his beating heart

‘He destroyed us all’  …  somehow these words sound very similar to the one Sherlock uses in TFP, in a situation where he considers himself to be a soldier: ‘Five minutes. It took her just five minutes to do all of this to us. Well, not on my watch.’ 

As mentioned above, Mary’s dialogue in TST matches the description about the incident with Sholto’s recruits almost identically …  ‘something went wrong’/’but it went wrong’ … ‘I was the only one who made it our’/’they all died; he was the only survivor’. And Mary considered AGRA to be her family ... ‘we were family’. 

Major John Sholto is an original character from ACDs novel The Sign of Four. His sons are called Thaddeus and Bartholomew. The renaming of the Major’s first name - from John to James - must have been a deliberate choice. A choice which is reflected in the skip code of TEH ‘John or James Watson … saint or sinner ... James or John’, as well as in John Watson’s middle name … Hamish (Scottish for James).

Major Sholto’s room number is ‘two oh seven’. This reminds me of the ‘double oh seven’ codeword for the ‘flight of the dead’ in ASIB. Two and double …. both means 2. Sure, the number on the door reads 207 but then, it happens several times in this story, that things told and things shown are sometimes not quite the same or vis versa. 

When the wedding guests leave the church and the reception takes place, Sholto is already wounded and slowly dying. He has been stabbed before.

Sherlock investigates the cases of both guardians

Bainbridge’s note reaches him sometime during the wedding preparations. John and Sherlock arrive just in time to save Private Bainbridge’s life. The case though remains unsolved.

Without knowing it at the time, Sherlock investigates Sholto’s case during John’s stag night. They call the investigation of the ghost-man the ‘Mayfly Man’ case. It remains also unsolved.

Sherlock includes both unsolved cases into his best man speech at John’s wedding and here at last, all the puzzle pieces fall into place and Sherlock is able to solve both cases, which are closely related. As a consequence Major Sholto’s life can be saved as well. 

The person responsible for the attempts to kill Private Bainbridge and Major Sholto is:

Jonathan Small

‘Brilliant, ruthless, almost certainly a monomaniac - though, in fairness, his photographs are actually quite good’ … that’s how Sherlock describes the killer. Small’s motive is revenge. He is convinced that Major Sholto is responsible for the death of Small’s brother Peter, who had been among the killed recruits. It seems that Private Bainbridge merely had the misfortune and got randomly chosen for the rehearsal of Sholto’s murder. But ... why this particular 'foot soldier’? (I’ll come back to that question later)

Jonathan Small grins like Jim Moriarty and wears a checkered shirt like John. He is a brilliant, ruthless monomaniac and obviously also a womaniizer who has no problems to woo half a dozen women, almost at the same time, into telling him well-kept secrets. Basically … a perfect blend of Jim Moriarty and traditional John ‘three continents’ Watson. 

Like Major Sholto, Jonathan Small too is an original character from ACDs novel The Sign of Four. His name has not been changed. Only together with his female and not-canon counterpart Janine, Mary’s bridesmaid, who seems to be a lovely blend of Irene and Jim, the name chosen for the antagonist of this episode, appears to gain a special significance. 

Janine - deiminutive of Jeanne, female form of John … ‘little Johnny’

Jonathan - diminutives are Jon, Jonni ... though not related to ‘John’ regarding the meaning of the name, it can still be heard as … ‘little Jonny’  (’You can talk, Johnny-boy. Go ahead.‘ Jim, TGG)

None other than ‘little Jo(h)nny’ (the H makes the difference) is responsible for the almost murder of Private Bainbridge and Major Sholto, the first two stabbing victims of this episode. 

‘Little Johnny’ also happens to be another word for penis … the ‘meat dagger’.

Who’s the third ‘victim’ then?

Mary Elizabeth Morstan

She is a character full of surprises who starts as a simple nurse who marries John Watson in TSOT. Among Sherlock’s deduction-word-cloud in TEH the term ‘guardian’ can be found and only one episode after the ‘wedding’, Sherlock outs her as facade … his very own facade, because the Empty Houses in Leinster Gardens, on whose front walls Mary’s face is projected, are Sherlock’s property. 

Mary Elizabeth Morstan isn’t her real name either. It’s the name of a stillborn child from a gravestone in Chiswick Cementry. This connects her character to the other stillborn child of this story ... Rachel Wilson, the pink lady’s daughter from ASIP. The initials A.G.R.A. stand for Mary’s true name, she tells later … but soon this turns out to be incorrect as well. A.G.R.A. was a group of four undercover agents who worked for the British Government. Prior to her ‘retirement’ Mary had been a member of that group. Sherlock describes her as ‘super-agent with a terrifying skill set’. Based on the current status, her two first names are Rosamund Mary … the family name is still unknown (if there even is one). 

Why should Mary be the third stabbing victim?

Readers of my theories will probably know that I’m playing for a long time now with a mind palace scenario which stretches from the beginning, most likely in PILOT (or even before) to the end of S4 (x). Back then I wondered ...

Is it really so farfetched to consider the possibility that Sherlock tries to deduce and solve the mysteries and problems of his own live - and his falling in love with John - at first in his mind? Before he comes out?

Over decades - since ACD - the story of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson has been told by the famous 'unreliable narrator’. Could it be that this time - with Sherlock BBC - the world will get the true story? Finally told by Sherlock himself? By looking right into his heart and mind and soul? By showing how his brilliant mind works? How his heart and soul expand and grow?

Would TPTB do such a thing? Stay in Sherlock’s mind over the span of multiple episodes? Follow his train of thought … show his evolution … in such a way? I don’t know. But it sounds thrilling to me. (Nov 2016)

Based on those early ideas I gradually came to the conclusion that Sherlock BBC tells the story of how Sherlock Holmes deduced his own persona. He does this the same way he investigates his criminal cases … by setting up scenarios in his mind and repeating those until he has found the correct solution (The Stage is set). Investigating his own case - the pink one - in such a way, would mean that all the characters which appear on Sherlock’s ‘mind stage’ represent different aspects of himself. Some of them may be based on real life persons, most of them are probably entirely created by Sherlock’s imagination. I like to compaire this process to a ‘mind journey’ or to a long (dramatic) dialogue, Sherlock holds with himself. This propably doesn’t happen during a dream or in a state of coma, as I thought back in 2016. A lot of time and thinking has gone by since then. Nowadays I presume that a conscious thinking process would fit better with the literal character Sherlock Holmes, whose deductions are always built on facts, science, reason and logic. It would be rather OOC that a man like Holmes would base an important, life changing decision on anything else than his razor sharp mind. Anyway, it’s just one of many theories.

Mary now … ever since I noticed the lot of similarities this character shares with Sherlock (x) my view on her started to change considerably. To me she isn’t the woman anymore who comes between Sherlock and John but instead the facade Sherlock Holmes created and married to his traditional, eternal friendship with John Watson for the sole purpose, to hide his romantic feelings and his sexual desire for the friend behind this protective wall. Mary is Sherlock’s facade, his guardian, his firewall … because:

John can’t ever know that I lied to him. It would break him and I would lose him forever – and I will never let that happen. Please … understand. There is nothing in this world that I would not do to stop that happening.

In my opinion, these are Sherlock’s own words and they express his fear of what might happen to the uinque friendship he shares with John, if the friend ever discovers the true nature of his feelings for him. Sherlock would do anything to stop that happening, even if this means that he has to incarcerate his emotions inside a high-security facility, behind elephant glass and chain his sexuality with iron bonds to a wall in a padded cell, like a hound from hell.  

The ‘meat dagger’ incident

Sherlock tells the wedding guests - Major Sholto sits among them - about the unsolved Bainbridge case and asks if any of them has got a theory how that guard might have been stabbed. What kind of murderer can walk through walls, which weapon can vanish? Molly’s fiancé Tom (both characters are mirrors for John and Sherlock) assumes it could be a case of ‘attempted suicice by meat dagger’ ... something that would have been self administered. 

A lot has been written since then about the ‘meat dagger’ as a metaphor for 'penis’ …. for ‘little Johnny’.  :)

Sherlock sees only one feature of interest in the whole case … while he tried to solve the mystery, the eternal friend saved the life of the guard. And just the same happens a little while later with Major Sholto, the other guardian. It turns out that both men - both guardians - have been stabbed by the same killer … Jonathan Small … little Jonny, the meat dagger ....

There’s only one other character in this episode who has been stabbed unknowingly as well. That’s Mary. And in her case it’s indeed … ‘stabbed by meat dagger’ because Sherlock deduces her pregnancy by the end of the episode. Or expressed in computer language:  the firewall has been penetrated by the virus.

The ‘father’ might be John or David, Mary’s ex. It doesn’t matter if one views the story metaphorically where all characters represent aspects of Sherlock himself. Going by his looks, David is clearly a mirror for John, while his history regarding the constant online observation of Mary, connects him to Mycroft, the brain. David seems to be a ‘blended’ mirror like Jonathan Small (John/Jim) or Janine (Irene/Jim). A mirror who represents the ongoing interest of the brain in the feelings hidden behind the facade. 

When Sherlock marries John and Mary, he puts a guardian in front of his true feelings for the friend. He tries to ‘downgrade’ those feelings. And yet, Sherlock allows three ‘social ancounters a year’ but ‘always in John’s - the traditional friendship’s presence’. That sounds very much like the ‘calculated risk’ Mycroft takes with Eurus. Both ‘brothers’ seem to be ‘love-addicts’ in need of a fix, once in a while … when the burden of ‘holding oneself to a higher standard’, of ‘keeping oneself right’ gets too heavy … or too boring. In that case it could propably happen that one takes the frustration out on the wall … then the wall has it coming …  :)

The moment of revelation

When Sherlock is blinded by the flashlight of ‘little Jo(h)nni’s’ camera, he suddenly realizes that the cases of Bainbridge and Sholto are connected. That the stabber has to be the same person. It’s the moment when the first domino piece falls and knocks over the next, and the next, and the next …. leading to a chain reaction of revelations at the end of which Sherlock knows without any doubt that his new facade had been penetrated again … this time though by a ‘kill shot’. He’d been hit by AMO (the perfect ammonition), fired by the crack shot that is his eternal friend. The seed of love has been laid without Sherlock noticing the ‘chink in his armour’ through which Cupid’s arrow hit home. Now love has taken root behind his facade and is growing. 

The name chosen for that love is Rosamund - Rose of the world, as the dialogue in TST confirms. There’s a real rose of that name - Rosa Mundi - an old rose depicted in a work of Sandro Botticelli “Virgin Adoring the Sleeping Christ Child”. This rose is also known by the synonym ‘rosa versicolor’ - which means ‘rose of many or changing colours ... iridiscent’.

The word iridescence is derived in part from the Greek word ἶρις îris , meaning rainbow, It is the phenomenon of certain surfaces that appear to gradually change color as the angle of view or the angle of illumination changes. (X)

Sherlock - the ‘virgin’ he is called in ASIB by Jim and Irene - announces the pregnancy of Mary (I still wonder if this means that he is the 'Gabriel’ of A.G.R.A. - the angel who announces virgin Mary’s pregnancy). And during the stag night, John is labeled with ‘Madonna’. Another name for Virgin Mary. This turns the eternal friend also into the ‘virgin’, just like Sherlock and Mary. Another ‘sign of three’ one could say. 

Three virgins - three novices - who will now start a new journey on a way they have never travelled before. Sherlock will finally encounter romantic love and accept it ‘it is what it is’, the facade will ‘get retired in a pretty permanent sort of way’ as the brain blatantly puts it in TST and the traditional ‘eternal’ friendship will have to change into a romantic-sexuell relationship. A morphing together of friendship and sex - John and James - would be a quite logical consequence, I guess.

In TST the little baby is christened with the name Rosamund, a name that can be traced back to ‘rainbow’ … Rosie for short.  And rosy=pink!

‘Oh, what a night! ... I was never gonna be the same … I felt a rush like a rollin' ball of thunder spinnin' my head around n' takin' my body under’ 

No wonder this song has been chosen by the creators to accompany this scene. Overwhelmed by emotions - surprise, confusion, amazement, shock, joy, panic, uncertainty, concern, fear - Sherlock isn’t able anymore to carry on with this ‘wedding’ .... with this renewed ‘changing of the guard’. He walks away alone into the night. The case is solved. Sherlock is aware of what happened. Now he has to deal with the consequences. Should he really replace his guardian again or should he finally stop pretending, stop lying, drop the facade and confess his deepest secret?

Because if you tell them and they decide they’d rather not know, you can’t take it back. You can’t unsay it. Once you’ve opened your heart, you can’t close it again.

This confrontation, Sherlock fights with himself, becomes the centrepiece of the following episode (HLV) where Sherlock is completely torn into. One half of his being, still protected by the facade, is at war with the ... ‘other one’, the slowly increasing emotional side of him. But somewhere deep inside his mind he probably knows already that this is a war ‘he must lose’. And so Sherlock has to go deeper ...

TAB doesn’t only take Sherlock back to his literal roots. In this episode Sherlock investigates again two of the main threads of the story and ties them together through the ‘bride’ … FALL and HOUND. Mary, the facade, feels already ‘left behind’ and John, who represents Sherlock’s now fully acknowledged, tender feelings, directed at his friend ... ‘does grow up so fast’. The episode ends with Sherlock, who throws himself into a torrent of water=emotions and follows Jim Moriarty, Mr Sex, down the Reichenbach Fall … right into the emotional rollercoaster that is Series Four. 

Like the investigation in TAB, this series runs backwards as well. TST repeats the events of S2 and S3 while TLD zooms in on S1. I persume this happens because Sherlock applies an ability he describes to Dr. Watson as ... ‘reasoning backwards’:

“In solving a problem of this sort, the grand thing is to be able to reason backwards. That is a very useful accomplishment, and a very easy one, but people do not practise it much. In the every-day affairs of life it is more useful to reason forwards, and so the other comes to be neglected. There are fifty who can reason synthetically for one who can reason analytically…Let me see if I can make it clearer. Most people, if you describe a train of events to them, will tell you what the result would be. They can put those events together in their minds, and argue from them that something will come to pass. There are few people, however, who, if you told them a result, would be able to evolve from their own inner consciousness what the steps were which led up to that result. This power is what I mean when I talk of reasoning backwards, or analytically.”  (ACD  A Study in Scarlet, Conclusion) 

There’s one important change though, which will alter everything. Sherlock now adds baby Rosie, the pink seed of love, the AMO-factor, to his equation. As a consequence his mask, his facade - that what ‘thatched’ and guarded him - crumbles and falls. And Sherlock accepts the change … It is what it is. 

Then, in TFP, the third episode of S4, Sherlock puts the results of his deductions under the sharp lens of his emotional core, for the ultimate experiment … the final distillation … to produce at last a clear solution. Still missing is the chemical reaction that should follow the application of that solution, one might say. :)

Back to the three ‘guardians’

My husband is three people

During the wedding preparations, John tries to interst Sherlock for this curious case. John says the sentence ‘my husband is three people’ twice, interupted only by this short dialogue:

SHERLOCK: Major James Sholto. Who he? MARY: Oh, John’s old commanding officer. 

Taking John’s words ‘my husband is three people’ literally, then he is talking about his own husband … which will soon be Mary. Husband, not wife, because Mary represents an aspect of Sherlock, his facade, his cover ... his ‘thatch’. As mentioned above, when Sherlock marries John to Mary, he puts a guardian in front of his true feelings for the friend … one could also say …. he places a commander at their/his side. And this is exactly what Mary does in later episodes. She decides who mowes the lawn, chooses the name of the baby and that it is her to take John home and not vis versa. 

Husbands can be equated with facades, with commanders, with guards. All of them serve as protectors and defenders of Sherlock’s true feelings for the friend. 

Who could have been the first ‘husband’ … the first facade, the first guardian?

Neither of us were the first

This is what Mary tells Sherlock, while John welcomes his ‘privious’ commander. Is she really talking about sexuell experiences of her brand-new husband with another man, just to taunt Sherlock? Viewing the Mary-character as an aspect of Sherlock himself and not as a real wife that comes between two men, I heavily doubt this. Applying a metaphorical reading to the story, wouldn’t it be much more likely that this conversation is about their - Mary’s and Sholto’s - assigned profession. Neither of us were the first … guardian.

Mary is the husband to be, the most recently chosen facade, John’s new commanding officer, an undercover agent of the government.

Major James Sholto is John’s old commanding officer, Sherlock’s previous facade, which turned out to be not strong enough. 

The only other guard in this story is Stephen Bainbridge, Private in the Household Guard of the Queen. The foot soldier named after Saint Stephen, the first martyrer. 

And isn’t there somthing strikingly similar regarding those three guards as well as a noticeable increase in drama and strength, which so often happens when sequences are repeated on Sherlock’s mind stage?

Private Bainbridge guards the Queens Palace. The ‘East’ zoomes in on him, then he get’s stabbed by ‘little Jonny’ - the meat dagger - without noticing it. A changing of the guard takes place. Bainbridge almost dies beneath a shower of water.

Major Sholto guards the Queens country. He fights on a battlefield in the East beneath a burning hot sun. Something goes wrong and all the recruits under his command die. Badly wounded himself, Sholto has to leave the service and change into retirement. He gets stabbed by ‘little Jonny’ - the meat dagger - and almost dies.

Mary secretly works for Mycroft, the government, the ‘queen’ -  as an undercover ‘super-agent with a terrifying skill set’. Her last operation took place in the East. Something went wrong and a lot of people died. It first looked as if Mary had been the only surviver (like Sholto). She marries ‘Johnny-boy’ Watson, gets stabbed by his meat dagger, becomes pregnant and …. dies not long after ‘PINK-RAINBOW-ROSIES’ birth.

The Sign of Three is about the ‘changing of the guard’. It takes place inside Sherlock’s head. But the marriage of John and Mary, that Sherlock arranges so heartbreakingly beautiful (and so strikingly yellow), turns out to be utterly pointless. Because the bride, the husband, the new commander, the facade is already pregnant ... had been stabbed before the wedding ... before the changing of the guard. 

The Yellow Face connection

This isn’t new. It has been discussed before in this interesting meta  About Yellow Face  by @darlingtonsubstitution  (sadly the part below the cut is gone) from 2017. As mentioned in the comments there, the creators of Sherlock BBC once refered to their favourite ACD stories. Yellow Face was among them but ... they wouldn’t be able to adapt it, because of the sensitive content, they said. This isn’t quite true though, it seems. On the contrary, the colour yellow features most prominently in Sherlock BBC … and not just the colour itself. 

It starts with Sherlock’s and John’s first date at Angelo’s. The whole scene is drenched in yellow. PILOT even more than ASIP.

A secret code of ancient cyphers, sprayed in yellow paint, leads to the Yellow Dragon Circus. 

Golden cats and big ‘yellow’ felines - lions - roam the story. 

Yellow is the colour of the smiley face on the wall of the 221b living room. 

There’s an assassin who carries a yellow ladder and a yellow tool case with a gun in it. 

A bright yellow mask has been placed inside a box, alongside a train, a phone, nicotin patches and a note. 

The main colour of the wedding ... bright yellow. It’s the wedding that leads Sherlock to the revelation ... to his love deduction. 

A canary trainer, a trainer of yellow birds, turns out to be the killer. 

Norbury, the case of the Yellow Face from canon, plays a vital role in TST 

The finish of a race is marked with a bright yellow band that floats slowly to the ground while a ‘confessing’ serial killer, who is a mirror for John, passes as winner, signaling a W with his fingers, while the fingers from the ‘East’,, next to Private Bainbridge, signal a double V.

Yellow is the colour of the sun, of fire, flames and explosions.

Yellowbeard ….

But one of the most important links to Yellow Face is the following one:

JOHN: Mary, I may not be a very good man, but I think I’m a bit better than you give me credit for, most of the time. (Sherlock BBC, TST) 'I am not a very good man, Effie, but I think that I am a better one than you have given me credit for being.'  (Grant Munro, The Adventure of the Yellow Face)

This piece of dialogue connects John to Grant Munro, the husband of Effie, the woman who hides her secret child from a previous marriage behind a yellow mask. She doesn’t do it out of some dark or sinister motive as Sherlock Holmes is convinced at first. Her former marriage had been legal and she'd loved her late husband dearly. Lucy, her little girl, can truly be called a child of love. But Effie fears to reveal Lucy, because the girl is ‘different' and the mother is anxious to lose the man she loves now, because of this. She is torn into between the love for her child and the love for her husband.

She (Effie) drew a large silver locket from her bosom. 'You have never seen this open.'

'I understood that it did not open.'

She touched a spring, and the front hinged back. There was a portrait within of a man, strikingly handsome and intelligent, but bearing unmistakable signs upon his features of his African descent.  (ACD, The Yellow Face)

ACDs Yellow Face is a case without crime, without any devious betrayal. Instead, it’s about love and the fear to lose  love, because at that time in ACDs story, it’s about a love not accepted by many. 

'That is John Hebron, of Atlanta,' said the Lady (Effie), 'and a nobler man never walked the earth. I cut myself off from my race in order to wed him; but never once while he lived did I for one instant regret it. It was our misfortune that our only child took after his people rather than mine.   (ACD, The Yellow Face)

In ACDs Yellow Face, the ‘first husband’ is of ‘African descent’ … just like Private Bainbridge, who is the ‘first guardian’ - the first of the three ‘identical husbands’ - in Sherlock BBC, The Sign of Three. He is the one who represents Sherlock’s earliest facade … the guardian of the Queen’s Palace.

Just like @darlingtonsubstitution presumed more than two years ago, I’m now more convinced than ever, that Moffat and Gatiss did adapt ACDs Yellow Face and they not only included it in Sherlock BBC, they made it into the main theme of their story (beside ‘hound’, ‘fall’ and ‘scarlet/pink’). In their version though, the focus shifts from ‘unacceptable’ skin-colour to ‘unacceptable’ sexuality. 

Sherlock BBCs baby ... Rosie ... Sherlock’s baby ... represents love. And this love is pink and has been given a name that can be traced back to ‘Rainbow’. The Sign of Three tells the story of the ‘changing of the guards’ and how Sherlock finally discovers the AMO-factor that will alter his life completely.

When I discoverd Sherlock BBC for the first time (back in 2011) I was thrilled by that fascinating crime drama and its two charismatic leads. Now, after 13 episodes, it has grown into so much more than just an excellent crime drama among others. The way I read it, Sherlock BBC is a wonderful and stunning story about equality. Inside Sherlock’s mind, the great detective doesn’t only solve the greatest secret of his life. No, the actors Sherlock chooses to represent the different aspects of his persona, are as diverse as the colours of the rainbow. They are old and young, male and female, beautiful and ugly, strong and weak, rich and poor. Neither gender, sexuality nor the shade of skin colour or from which corner on this planet someone comes, is of any importance. Anyone can be a part of this Sherlock Holmes. That’s what makes this adaptation so absolutely unique to me. Sherlock himself becomes the rainbow of his own story. 

Thanks for reading to anyone who is still there. :))))  I leave you to your own deductions. And thanks @callie-ariane​ for your invaluable scripts.

December, 2019

________________________________________________________________

Episode spanning metaphorical reading of Sherlock BBC: 

From PILOT to TGG  ….      About the meaning of S1 

From ASIB to TEH  ….  The big question - what is the meaning of Reichenbach

[passionate-reply]

5 + 8!

5. SHARE A LITTLE-KNOWN FACT ABOUT AN ARTIST YOU LOVE.

After a quick glance at my blog, you can probably imagine that I’m chock full of these. Here’s a fun one for you. I’ve been a big fan of Ultravox ever since I was a young teenager, but it was an embarrassingly long time before I realized neither of their two frontmen recorded music under the real names.

Their original frontman, Dennis Leigh, originally wanted to be called “Johnny Vox,” but after a dressing-down from percussionist Warren Cann, determined that he and his comrades would be more than just Leigh’s faceless backing band and insisting to be called “Warren Ultra,” he retreated to being called “John Foxx.” I guess that might be for the better--it’s got less of an obviously punk sensibility to it, and while Ultravox very much got their start in that tradition, Foxx has gone on to become a hell of a lot more than that. “Dennis” is kind of a silly name, to be honest, and I don’t think I’d like to be called Dennis either...Foxx even liked the name “John” enough to give it to his own son years later, which is, honestly, kind of weird, if you ask me.

Ultravox were of course better known and more commercially successful after they started working with “Midge” Ure at the tail end of 1979. For years, years I say, I assumed “Midge” must surely be some given name, or diminutive of one, that was common in Scotland but one I hadn’t heard elsewhere simply because I grew up in the USA. Probably related to “Michael” or “Mitch,” right? Nope! That would just make too much sense. Ure’s given name is James. As a teenager, he played in a band with someone else called Jim, and the latter insisted that since he was older, he could stay “Jim,” but Ure would simply have to change. You can’t have two Jims in one band, that’s simply ridiculous. They reversed “Jim” to create “Mij” and then I suppose at some point started spelling it phonetically as “Midge.” This one is even more petty and ridiculous. And somehow, this name simply stuck with him over all these years. You could be forgiven for assuming, as some historical interviews do, that it has something to do with his size. He’s definitely a bit short--not more than 5′7″, I did meet him myself. Though it could be why it’s proven to be so sticky.

8. WHAT IS YOUR BIGGEST MUSICAL GUILTY PLEASURE?

THE SMITHS - “HOW SOON IS NOW?”

I don’t think pleasure should ever come with guilt--as long as nobody’s getting hurt, there’s nothing wrong with liking whatever you like. Someone wise once gave some very practical advice: if you’re not sure exactly how and why you like something, and it perhaps distresses you that you’re liking something outside of your usual musical taste, jot down the particular qualities or properties of this piece of music that seem to be getting your attention. They may be similar to what you usually like, or they may be different, but whatever the case may be, it can help you form a more integrated theory of what constitutes your personal taste, and what you look for in a piece of music.

I guess I should probably give an example of what I’m talking about. I’ve always been fascinated by “How Soon Is Now?” from first hearing it. But it’s rather clearly out of sync with the rest of my music collection, chiefly because it isn’t very electronic. However, if I break it down, almost all of the gears are turning for something I WOULD probably like. It’s got a driving and insistent rhythm that near dominates the rest of the track. While I’m not so much a fan of guitar, the way the guitar is operating here--the sudden, dissonant burst or stab on top of that rhythm--closely mirrors how a synthesiser might be used in what I normally like. And I like the style of the vocals very much, the deadpan delivery, the frustration and gloom, the vague but clearly ominous lyrical content.

Once you get a handle on why something appeals to you and you can situate it within the context of your own taste, I think it makes you feel much more in control of the situation, even if your taste and what we like and dislike are often not a matter of personal choice!

Thanks for the asks, friend! These were some especially fun ones.