#james and sirius are classist dickheads
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
my thoughts on the marauders
the numbers aren't rankings btw (also i sound dead in this post because. i am dead inside rn. kjfdjkdfahkj help me)
fuck james, only useful thing he did in life was get laid and help create BWL
fuck sirius but at least he suffered :/ i guess he was an ok father figure but still a shit person + classist (like james). (upon further reflection, he wasn't even that great of a father figure- harry loved and relied on him though so?) edit: okay i have realized my thoughts on sirius are kind of complicated. like, yes, the logical part of my mind hates him. BUT, a part of me does like him, even though i constantly feel guilty about it lol. i accept that he's a bad person who did bad things, but i can't help but feel bad for him, you know?
fuck pettigrew, hate him, fucking creep and weirdo lived as MULTIPLE LITTLE KIDS' PET RAT AND SLEPT IN THE SAME BED WITH THOSE KIDS AND DID GOD KNOWS WHAT ELSE, but it was the marauders fault he betrayed them imo. they never treated him as an equal despite what fanon will tell you.
okay controversial but. teen remus was a victim of james & sirius. like. the marauders were such a stupid classist dynamic of a friend group, i ship prongsfoot because they're the only two that are dickheads enough to match each other. anyways, remus' thing was: he got into a bad situation and Could Not Get Out. his problem solving Thing is just run away, run away, run away, and never look back. at hogwarts, he couldn't do that. there were super popular kids who were his 'friends' and knew his deepest darkest secret. if he hadn't befriended them by luck on the train, he'd probably be another severus, because james and sirius are, again, classist dicks. but, as he did befriend them, he had nowhere to go after that which. as a dude with a fucked up childhood + trust issues + commitment/staying in one place issues,,, that sounds like a nightmare. as an adult tho the things he did were. unacceptable. i feel like they are direct effects from his fucked up youth? like he never got to grow up properly mentally/emotionally? he's still in the 'run away run away run away' mentality always. add being constantly discriminated against bc of something you cant control that people hate you for and its just. kskdhskshf. his life sounds like a nightmare i just can't help but feel for him :(
#aj rambles#harry potter fandom#anti marauders#anti james potter#anti sirius black#anti peter pettigrew#pro remus lupin#james and sirius are classist dickheads#i'll only ever like them in AUs#sigh#remus lupin
10 notes
¡
View notes
Note
What would you say are your more controversial opinions about the hp characters?
ohhhh okayyy. i feel like my opinions on a lot of the characters arenât controversial because i dont feel super strongly towards anyone in any negative light but here are some i could think of at the top of my head:
iâm glad the malfoys faced more extreme backlash after the second wizarding war. a lot of people in the fandom seem to be very sympathetic towards draco and scorpius for getting dogpiled with the brunt of it (which yeah, it sucks, especially for scorpius) but the prejudice makes complete make sense to me. if i was someone who didnât know scorpiusâ character, and had someone from my family get killed in the second war due to death eaters or somethingâ seeing the malfoys still be wealthy and walk around freely without any jailtime, i would be bitter too. theyâre hated on but theyâre still one of the richest families ever, so theyâll live LOL
another anon has asked about this and i havenât responded to them yet but when i do i will link it here for my reasons. basically: the best character in the cursed child is harry potter. i think the way they wrote his character and ptsd carried the play. it was def his story, not albusâ.
i do think dumbledore has some aspects of him that may be considered morally gray, but mostly i dont think he is. he does everything for the good of the world, and his complete selflessness leads him to sacrifice anything for itâ even himself and the people he loves, when necessary. i completely understand why people wouldnât agree with his methods though.
james potter isnât a sunshine character heâs a dickhead. fans of him made him a golden retriever character to be more palatable for modern times. i like him the way he is: an asshole and then less of an asshole đ this is what true stanning looks like
pansy parkinson is racist and out of all the female side characters, developing HER is so questionable from fandom
harry had questionable descriptions about a lot of male characters to make people think he could be a little đłď¸âđ there was bill, there was sirius, there was cedric. but draco is not a part of that list. harry was not feeling draco whatsoever throughout the series but drarry shippers cling to that one âobsessedâ line
furthermore, harry rejecting dracoâs offer of friendship wasnât a sad or a âwhat ifâ scene. draco was being a classist piece of shit and harry didnt want to fuck with that, there isnt any way in any timeline he wouldve accepted dracoâs friendship.
slytherin sucks just generally lol. people want so bad to pluck anti-heroes out of a series that was written specifically with the mind to make all the characters suck.
hermione and ronâs drama isnât as toxic as people make it out to be. yes, this includes the time hermione sent birds after him. people act like its the end of the world but she was tackling puberty and the end of society soooo i give her a pass to tweak out.
mostly every harry potter character has horrific names. like literally mostly everyone. even the name harry potter đ
ďżźmovie romione wasnât that bad LOL
severus snapeâs âredemptionâ or whatever was so ass. he bullies kids for five years and then everything is chill because⌠true love? on harryâs mum? are you kidding me đ
weasley family angst goes hard but people (especially percy stans and some ron&ginny stans) acting like theyâre the most toxic family to walk the earth make me want to rip my hair out and eat it. molly loves her kids guys shes not evil. jesus.
genuinely trying to think of more but i canât right nowâŚ. maybe i will reblog and add to it. i feel like most of my opinions arenât that controversial though đ
#i feel neutrally about a lot of the characters so its not like i have huge things to say butâŚ#the james oneâŚ. he can be a sunshine character post redemption arc after hogwarts but most of the fandom ignores his need to redeem himself#-in the first place#romione#harry potter#hp#hpcc#cursed child#scorpius malfoy#albus severus potter#marauders#james potter#molly weasley#anti drarry#draco malfoy#pansy parkinson#severus snape#albus dumbledore#percy weasley#hp golden era#bill weasley#sirius black#hermione granger#ron weasley#ginny weasley#cedric diggory#rewriting#ask#anon
285 notes
¡
View notes
Note
okay so- i am slightly confused
before i start: i hate fanon regulus. he is literally a character who did like one (1) relevant thing to the plot, and that was making the horcrux harder for harry to find. he was an enthusiastic death eater and only backed out after getting cold feet.
but, in the same way, canon james potter is a bully who stalks and objectifies a girl and tries to guilt trip/manipulate/whatever her into dating him by tormenting her best friend. he is super white-privilege coded and very heavily classist. i totally get just liking the character and his potential in AUs, but do you have any thoughts on his canon characterization?
not meant to be rude, genuinely trying to understand things. no pressure to answer if you don't want to! :)
James is, along with Sirius, my favourite Marauder, so I am totally open about speaking on his characterisation.
In regards to your ask, James stalking Lily and obsessively asking her out is fanon. We have one instance of him asking her out in the books and absolutely no indication anywhere that he had done it before and it was a common occurrence.
James was indeed a bully and a dickhead during his teen years and his attitude did come from a place of growing up very financially secure and sheltered. At the same time, James was a great friend. He went out of his way to help those close to him. He had a strong sense of morality as well. He was a pure-blood man that could have allowed the war to go on because he was safe but he still chose to fight, he still chose to marry the woman he loved even if so many people in their world frowned upon their marriage.
Does any of this excuse his actions towards Snape (and towards other students he hexed on a whim)? No, it doesnât. But it doesnât have to because nuance exists. Characters should be three-demensional, flawed.
To me, the most interesting aspect of Jamesâ characterisation is his growth. Fanon takes that away from James by making him into his perpetually kind person who wants to help everyone. It removes the nuance from James to turn him into an accessory to other charactersâ redemption and victim arcs.
35 notes
¡
View notes