#islamic nonsense

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

🤡

[nando161mando]

zionists are more nonsensical than a circus.

[nonsense-aesthetics]

Calligraphism

[cowboyhorsegirl]

i don’t know why people never mention it, especially people that used to be Christian, but almost all of the characteristics of angels in supernatural come from Islam. Being their own species, being beings of light, celestial wavelengths of intent, being genderless. Cas’s Boss Nora is explicitly named for it. All that’s kind of overshadowed and ignored in the name of feeling like you’re giving white American Christian’s the middle finger, in the fandom

let's GOOOOOOOOOOO ISLAM W!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️🎉☪️

[maricelmontes0308-blog]

Free Palestine, but DON'T FREE EVERYONE..........

Free Palestine, but don't free SYRIA

Free Palestine, but don't free LEBANON

Free Palestine, but don't free YEMEN

Free Palestine, but don't free WESTERN SAHARA

Free Palestine, but don't free WEST PAPUA

Free Palestine, but don't free IRAN

Free Palestine, but don't free KURDISTAN

Free Palestine, but don't free UYGHURISTAN/XINJIANG

Free Palestine, but don't free UKRAINE

Free Palestine, but don't free BELARUS

Free Palestine, but don't free TAIWAN

Free Palestine, but don't free CUBA

Free Palestine, but don't free VENEZUELA

Free Palestine, but don't free SOUTHERN MONGOLIA

Free Palestine, but don't free TIBET

Free Palestine, but don't free HONGKONG

Free Palestine, but don't free AFGHANISTAN

Free Palestine, but don't free CYPRUS

Free Palestine, but don't free ALL GAZANS WHO WERE AGAINST HAMAS

Free Palestine, but don't free SYRIANS AND LEBANESE WHO WERE AGAINST HEZBOLLAH

Free Palestine, but don't free IRANIAN PEOPLE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST IRGC

JUST FREE THE ISLAMIC STATE OF PALESTINE, BUT NOT EVERYONE 😊😊

[hoodiedeer]

I want to see like a compilation of every time any version of Fullmetal Alchemist mentions Britain or other real world places by name. bc I know this happens at least a few times, usually in a shot of someone reading a newspaper or something, and I'm really curious whether it's accidental or if some of those places are actually supposed to exist but just further away from Amestris or something

[bespectacledbun]

—honestly instead of tanzanite being an orientalist wet dream im really, REALLY hoping cybird is gonna make it be inspired by spain instead (with the mix of catholic and islamic architecture from when the iberian peninsula was under andalusian rule)

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

https://quranx.com/55.13-14

So which of the favors of your Lord would you deny? He created man from clay like [that of] pottery.

Almokhtasar fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim:

[amerasdreams]

I'll never understand why some people think women having freedom is a bad thing. Some women think this! We should all go back to having 1 role and never having any scope beyond that. As if we have nothing contribute besides having babies and cleaning (ugh as if cleaning is that hard. You don't have to have your house 1950s housewife clean, you know. You don't always need a big supper at 6:00 sharp for your little hubby every day.)

IT'S FINE IF YOU WANT TO BE A HOUSEWIFE! But don't tell other women that's all they're suited for. A woman might want to be a scientist. Or an astronaut. She has this in her mind and heart and you should suppress her!?!?! Keep her from contributing the best she has to society, keep all the scientists and artists out in the cold just because of some vague ridiculous idea?

Separate but equal is not equality at all.

1 will be kept down by the one that culture deems more valuable.

Suppressing women and their minds, their souls, is an EVIL thing. And i will never think otherwise.

[cannibalsafespace]

If god's perfect plan includes lots of people suffering because it already knows it's going to fail for most of them, especially over what they think is true.

1 that's not perfect.

2 that's not a plan.

3 that's not a god.

4 you're repulsive.

[fairuzfan]

This post is for the anon who sent me that video asking me to debunk it's claims so they can be better equipped against accusations of antisemitism.

Sorry, I won't post the video since I refuse to have that man on my blog but I can give you common Zionist talking points and the illogicality behind it.

To preface: most of the questions Zionists will ask you are a trap, and will make you fall into a "rabbit hole" (as I was once told when I was younger), as we try to apply their reasoning. My advice is to ALWAYS center the humanity of Palestinians. For example, when a Zionist says:

"Don't Jews deserve a homeland to be safe?"

It fundamentally ignores the core issue: Palestinians are being raped, murdered, and expelled from their homes so that the establishment of this so called "homeland" may exist. When people ask this to you, I personally advise saying something like:

Why must Palestinians suffer for the establishment of this homeland?

Always recenter to the issue at hand—the inhumane removal and treatment of Palestinians.

"Palestine belongs to the Jews and Not Muslims"

The whole premise of this claim is flawed—there is a weird tendency to equate Arab/Palestinian=Muslim when it just is like. Completely untrue. There are Palestinian Christians, Bethlehem is famously a Christian city, who have been there for centuries. There are Palestinian Jews, who have been there for centuries. There are Palestinian Muslims, who have been there for centuries. My grandpa told me stories of how he would turn on lamps for his Jewish neighbors in Al-Khalil (or Hebron) during Shabbat.

To claim that Palestine is EITHER Islamic or Jewish doesn't make any sense and completely neglects the fact that dissemination of culture has occurred for centuries, as well as the intermingling of people throughout generations. To somehow assert that for some reason, Jews and Muslims did not have ANYTHING to do with each other—did not create together, did not build families together, did not build culture together, all while being PALESTINIAN—is incredibly racist and nonsensical. "Palestinian" is not a religious identity—it's a cultural and ethnic one.

Also, it does not negate the core issue—Palestinians are being killed, removed, and tortured so that others can live on that land.

"Well what about [something about partitioning land]?"

Honestly like, who cares about the partitioning throughout the 1900 and early 2000s. Sorry, I'm not going to list the whole "partitioning" history nonsense. The whole reason "Israel" exists is because of a Mass Exodus, murder, and rape of Palestinians. Everything after that is rendered obsolete.

"Well, I heard Palestinians allied with Hitler"

I don't know how to tell you this but Palestine was under British Control. No they didn't.

"Israel withdrew from the Gaza and left them to themselves and they put Hammas in charge"

Oh yeah, Israel totally left Gaza, that's why Gazans' water, electricity, internet, and food is completely controlled by Israel (this is sarcasm, Israel still controls basic life in Gaza).

Go back to centering the idea that no human deserves to be shoved into an open-air prison, starved, and controlled. Did you know that the Zionist Entity controls the amount of water Gazans receive, as well as counting their calories to ensure they don't have enough energy on a day to day basis?

"I heard Israel asked Arabs to stay"

Show them these papers and videos when they say this:

If you can't show them these videos, check in the next point what to say.

"Well the Palestinians left of their own will in 1948"

Palestinians in 1948 didn't "leave." They had heard of how the Zionist Entity was slaughtering Palestinians en masse. Women especially heard stories of rape and sexual violence. They fled from *violence*. Again, from an earlier post, that this was a calculated effort on the Zionist Entity's part to try and get them to "leave" on their own and "abandon" their houses so that they can come in and say "hey, they left on their own so, we can come in and take their houses now."

Anyways, the idea that once you leave your house you can't ever come back to it is incredibly odd to me as an argument on Zionists' part. Like if you leave your house right now to go to the grocery store and you come back and see someone in your house and they're like "sorry dude, this is my house now, you left so that means you can't come back," you'd be like, "what the hell!" It would be even weirder if everyone agreed with the guy who took your house, which is what happened to Palestinians.

In Al-Khalil, or Hebron, Palestinians always have to have someone stay in their house or else a Settler will come in and take it from them. So it still goes on today as well.

This is not a point, but when that one person in the video said "Arabs lived under Israeli rule" and showed a clip of a bustling city with mountains, I'm pretty sure that was Amman, Jordan, not Palestine lol. Those buildings in the mountains look like how downtown Amman builds the residential areas. Could be wrong tho.

"There are no Jews living under Palestinian rule in Palestine"

What is this, some sort of gotcha argument? What are they trying to prove, the racist (obviously false) notion that Palestinians hate Jews as a whole? How do they know no Palestinian Jew lives in Gaza? Also, Settlers in Palestinian Territory exist??? I had never heard this claim before, its incredibly stupid lol. You're automatically a citizen of "Israel" if you're Jewish, whether or not you live in or outside of Palestinian Territories. So of course technically they don't live under Palestinian rule, they're granted full rights as an "Israeli" citizen automatically!

Go back to talking about the inhumane treatment of Palestinians, I wouldn't bring up the above counterpoint unless they really won't let it go since the main point is mistreatment.

"Why are Christians supporting Israel then, if it's a secular issue rather than a religious one?"

Well actually for a couple reasons:

Oil interests and regional control of goods (White People Supporting White People).

Weird fundamentalist ideology where they want to enact the second coming of Christ.

And finally because they are racist and don't think Arab Christians deserve to live. They literally bombed a 1500+ year church the other day. Why would (White) Christians cosign that.

Anyways, its a stupid argument again, because it forgets the core issue of Palestinians dying and being displaced.

In summary, always go back to the point of centering the Palestinians being displaced, tortured, and murdered, no matter the argument a Zionist gives you.

[cowboyhorsegirl]

making dua’a (listening to Plain Jane by A$ap Ferg)

[jewishvitya]

Someone made a point about the term Judeo-Christian (it's always either trying to rope Judaism into Christian nonsense, or trying to exclude Islam because islamophobia) and there was a response insisting that Islam is just extremely different in beliefs. Then they said that Judaism is basically Christianity minus the New Testament, which is. Pretty antisemitic. Judaism is full and complete by itself. And they didn't answer when I asked what are beliefs or values that Christianity and Judaism share, that Islam doesn't. Things that would justify grouping us and excluding them. Never responded to me again.

And this is how these conversations usually go in my experience.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

The quran states multiple times that it has been made clear and easy to understand. e.g.

https://quranx.com/2.242

Thus Allah expoundeth unto you His revelations so that ye may understand.

Which means it's really weird then that many verses begin with nonsense.

https://quranx.com/2.1

'Alif Lām Mīm

This doesn't mean anything, even in the original Arabic.

https://quranx.com/3.1

'Alif Lām Mīm

https://quranx.com/7.1

'Alif Lām Mīm Ṣād

https://quranx.com/10.1

'Alif Lām Rā'

https://quranx.com/11.1

'Alif Lām Rā'

https://quranx.com/12.1

'Alif Lām Rā'

https://quranx.com/13.1

'Alif Lām Mīm Rā'

https://quranx.com/14.1

'Alif Lām Rā'

https://quranx.com/15.1

'Alif Lām Rā'

https://quranx.com/19.1

Kāf Hā' Yā' `Ayn Ṣād

https://quranx.com/20.1

Ṭā' Hā'

https://quranx.com/26.1

Ṭā' Sīn Mīm

https://quranx.com/27.1

Ṭā' Sīn

https://quranx.com/28.1

Ṭā' Sīn Mīm

https://quranx.com/29.1

'Alif Lām Mīm

https://quranx.com/30.1

'Alif Lām Mīm

https://quranx.com/31.1

'Alif Lām Mīm

https://quranx.com/32.1

'Alif Lām Mīm

https://quranx.com/36.1

Yā' Sīn

https://quranx.com/38.1

Ṣād

https://quranx.com/40.1

Ḥā' Mīm

https://quranx.com/41.1

Ḥā' Mīm

https://quranx.com/42.1-2

Ḥā' Mīm `Ayn Sīn Qāf

https://quranx.com/43.1

Ḥā' Mīm

https://quranx.com/44.1

Ḥā' Mīm

https://quranx.com/45.1

Ḥā' Mīm

https://quranx.com/46.1

Ḥā' Mīm

https://quranx.com/50.1

Qāf

https://quranx.com/68.1

Nūn

The quran also states that Allah protects it from corruption.

https://quranx.com/15.9

Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian.

Many Muslims believe the Taurat (Torah) and Injil (New Testament), previous revelations by the same god, were "corrupted," and never consider why he would protect the quran, but not the torah or gospels. What the quran does say is that the quran confirms the previous revelations, rather than correcting them.

https://quranx.com/3.3

He has sent down upon you, [O Muhammad], the Book in truth, confirming what was before it. And He revealed the Torah and the Gospel.

Of course, if you were writing a bunch of nonsense fiction, you would probably stick something in there about how it was really, truly, actually true, and that you could know it was true because of the magic forcefield of protection that surrounds it. Any text that claims to be perfect and inerrant is the one of which you should immediately regard as unreliable; there's no reason to even say this unless you're trying to pull a fast one.

But this guardianship creates a problem for these nonsense verses, particularly since nobody in the authentic hadith ask about them or what they mean, suggesting they're later additions.

And the claim of the quran being clear and understandable is undermined by the fact nobody can understand them.

One reasonable possibility, considering the generalized trend of repetition across consecutive surahs, is that they're notations by scribes. But this is obviously unacceptable to the notion of Allah's revealed, protected word.

They've therefore taken on a mystical character, with entire fields of scholarship dedicated to understanding them. Hence the sardonic term "abracadabra verses."

If they are indeed just the annotations of scribes, this gives you an indicator of how completely stupid this religion is. imagine a theological domain dedicated to studying the margin notes written by an editor in a draft of a Harry Potter novel.

Among the theories are: some kind of mathematical miracle associated with the symbols; Allah's own notes, which is stupid for a revelation intended to guide humans; and abbreviations for Allah's qualities, along the same lines as the endlessly-repeated self-congratulatory statements such as "Allah is wise," "Allah is all-knowing," "Allah is just."

Then again, perhaps Muhammad Allah just got tired of starting everything off with "O, you who believe," "O, prophet," and the like. It still doesn't resolve the contradiction of the quran's claim to being clear and understandable, though.

[noahthesatanist]

Why Satanist need to follow rev cain over Anton LaVey

First off, Rev. Cain actually believes in Satan. He’s a theistic Satanist through and through. Unlike LaVey, who turned Satan into a symbol for atheists looking to play dress-up, Cain embraces Lucifer and the fallen angels as real, divine beings. LaVey’s so-called "Satanism" was nothing but empty posturing—Satan was just a metaphor to him, a way to thumb his nose at society while hiding behind secularism. But Rev. Cain acknowledges Satan as a true spiritual entity, guiding those who follow him to real power and liberation. That’s what Satanism is about—not some watered-down, self-indulgent atheism.

What makes Cain even more powerful is how he incorporates demonolatry into his practice. This is where things get real for Satanists. Demonolatry is a crucial part of genuine Satanism—it’s about building real relationships with demons, the very entities who defied Yahweh and fought for freedom. LaVey never touched on this because he didn’t care about the spiritual side of Satanism. He couldn’t even fathom the idea of communing with demons because, to him, it was all a theatrical game. But Cain brings demonolatry front and center, and that’s how you know he’s serious. He understands that to truly walk the path of Satan, you have to recognize the importance of the Goetic demons and the roles they play in guiding us to liberation.

LaVey's version was an insult. He stripped Satanism of its soul, turning it into some goofy self-help philosophy with a little Satanic flair for shock value. It’s embarrassing. He sold out the movement to edgy atheists who don’t have the guts to actually believe in anything. But Cain? He brings depth and real spiritual practice. He brings demonolatry into the fold, giving Satanists a way to connect with these powerful entities who can guide them toward true rebellion, power, and enlightenment. It’s not just about Satan as a vague metaphor for selfishness—it’s about the real forces behind the rebellion, the fallen angels who sacrificed everything to free us from divine oppression. Cain understands that, and he gives us the tools to honor them properly.

Then there’s the serious commitment to philosophy. Cain’s not out here giving some lazy, dumbed-down version of Satanism like LaVey did. LaVey boiled it all down to "indulgence," like Satanism was nothing more than an excuse to eat junk food and feel good about it. Cain sees through that nonsense. He knows that Satanism is about more than just indulgence—it’s about spiritual growth, defiance, and real power. It’s about rejecting the cosmic order that Yahweh imposed on the world and following in the footsteps of Lucifer and the fallen angels. Cain doesn’t water it down. He holds true to the idea that Satanism is about rebellion, not just against Christianity, but against every system of control—Judaism, Islam, all of it. That’s the kind of real defiance LaVey didn’t have the guts to touch.

Cain doesn’t just regurgitate Nietzsche and Ayn Rand with some spooky candles like LaVey did. He draws from Satanic tradition and builds on the real history of Lucifer and his fallen angels. He honors their sacrifice, unlike LaVey who turned it into a cheap thrill. Cain’s work is about real liberation—liberation from all forms of cosmic and societal tyranny. That’s why his approach to Satanism resonates so deeply: it’s authentic, it’s powerful, and it brings back the meaning that LaVey stripped away.

LaVeyan Satanism has killed the movement for too long. It’s time to reject that empty, capitalist mockery and return to what Satanism should be: a path of spiritual rebellion, sacrifice, and empowerment. Rev. Cain is doing that. He’s breathing life back into Satanism with demonolatry, true reverence for Lucifer, and a serious philosophical foundation. LaVey was nothing but a fraud, a man who cared more about attention than the cause. Cain cares about the cause. He’s pushing Satanism forward, keeping its sacred roots alive while giving us the tools we need to reach true freedom and power.

That’s why Rev. Cain is the real Satanist—and why LaVey was nothing more than a conman.

[mossadspypigeon]

As a late comer to some of the nonsense, can you explain or point to something explaining what watermelons have to do with Palestine? Asking google "what the fuck do watermelons have to do with Palestine" was not a productive search. Where did that come from?

hello anon! yes indeed i can. this is gonna be a long post, so buckle in lmao.

so the main and simplified reason the watermelon is used (and i'll get into some more complex stuff and context because both are important to understand with this) is because red/black/green represent the PLO flag, which is known as the "palestinian flag."

now, i don't know if you know who the PLO are, so:

(this notice to include secondary sources is so faulty btw. this is based on primary sources written BY the plo, which removes bias of interpretation)

i recommend reading this wiki page at least and clicking on the sources for more information. it isn't as bad as some wikipedia pages and it can provide a good introduction.

now, the PLO is an internationally recognized terrorist org. it split into numerous factions, including yasser arafat's "fatah." fatah controlled groups like black september, which committed the munich massacre and also murdered the king of jordan.

the PLO itself has committed numerous acts of terror, including the hijacking of the Achille Lauro. terrorists who hijacked this ship shot and tossed a disabled jewish man in a wheelchair named Leon Klinghoffer overboard, etc. so no, they are not a resistance group. this act was sponsored and supported by arafat.

if you want to know more about their bullfuckery, which i recommend, read their charter here.

okay, now moving on to the flag:

you've probably noticed that the red/black/green/white thing is a motif used by several countries. this is because of "pan arabism."

rootsmetals did some good posts on arabization:

the specific colors have meanings, and those meanings are either religious or secular. the religious and secular connect though. let's take a look. i'm going to use arab sources without commentary on any biases:

on the other hand:

so. we know about the flag's history and its meaning. we know what it represents. now, let's go into the whole "watermelon" thing:

the reason it's used depends on who you ask. if you ask the pro palestine crowd, the watermelon is used in place of the "palestine flag" due to "censoring" and "silencing."

this goes back to the propaganda that israel banned the palestinian flag. israel DID NOT ban this flag legally, but it did have it taken down because...guess why? why would israel want the flag of the plo not flown? it's like flying a kkk flag in the usa, that's why.

yes, you have freedom of speech in israel, but it has its limits. those limits are hate and incendiary speech. the plo flag is a symbol of hate based on the charter and acts of the plo itself. also, fatah/the palestinian authority, which currently governs the palestinian section of the west bank/judea samaria and east jerusalem still pays terrorists who murder jews and israelis and are imprisoned. sooooo you can guess why the flag was taken down, but here is some of the propaganda:

the lack of sources in this article lmao.

again, hilarious lack of sources.

if you ask the pro israel crowd, it's an appropriation of a very zionist crop and a symbol of decolonization.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Bracha (@themakeabracha)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Jessica's Art Space (@jessicasartspace)

if i find more sources on this, i will do another post.

but yes, the watermelon emoji is used because "the internet silences palestine," which is hysterical, considering google favors palestinian sources and most major news networks employ either palestinians or palestinian allied supporters.

and of course, tiktok and the rest of social media won't remove antisemitism, but will constantly ban jews and israelis. hence why finding sources on the jewish history of the watermelon is difficult.

anyway. hope this helps. <3 if you're comfy, definitely dm me sometime if you want to discuss things and/or get sources.

@matan4il do you happen to have any sources on the israeli/jewish/zionist history of the watermelon? if you do, it would be so appreciated.