#informedconsent

[nursing123]

CALL FOR ABSTRACT Track 17: Legal and Ethics in healthcare Present your research at the 15th American Healthcare Summit, Which Will Be Held May 14-16, 2025, in San Francisco. This CE/CME/CPD-accredited event focuses on healthcare, nursing, patient safety, and hospital management. Submit your abstract by December 31, 2024. Submit here: https://healthcare.utilitarianconferences.com/submit-abstract

[academic1995]

Research Ethics

Research ethics refers to the principles and guidelines that govern the conduct of scientific research, ensuring that it is performed with integrity, honesty, and respect for the rights of individuals and communities involved. Ethical research prioritizes transparency, accountability, and the protection of participants' confidentiality and welfare. It involves obtaining informed consent, avoiding conflicts of interest, ensuring the accuracy of data reporting, and respecting intellectual property. Adherence to research ethics ensures that studies are conducted responsibly and that the outcomes contribute positively to scientific knowledge without causing harm or exploitation.

Website : sciencefather.com

Nomination: Nominate Now

Registration: Register Now

Contact Us: contact@academicexcellenceawards.com

[translation-info]

The Significance of Sworn Translation in Healthcare

In a world where healthcare is becoming increasingly globalized, effective communication is crucial to ensure patient safety and compliance with legal standards. Sworn translation, or certified translation, plays a vital role in the healthcare sector by accurately translating medical documents, thus facilitating clear communication between healthcare providers and patients from different linguistic backgrounds. This article explores the importance of sworn translation in healthcare, the types of documents involved, and the benefits it offers.

What is Sworn Translation?

Sworn translation is the process of translating documents by a translator who has been officially accredited by a governmental body or professional organization. This accreditation ensures that the translator is qualified to handle sensitive and technical content accurately. In the healthcare context, common documents requiring sworn translation include:

Medical Records: Patient history, diagnosis, and treatment plans that must be clearly understood.

Informed Consent Forms: Documents that require patient signatures to confirm understanding of procedures and risks.

Clinical Trials Documentation: Protocols and patient information sheets that need to be translated for international studies.

Prescriptions: Medication instructions that must be accurately conveyed to avoid potential errors.

Sworn translators take an oath to provide accurate and reliable translations, which is essential in the healthcare setting where clarity can impact patient care.

Why Sworn Translation is Crucial in Healthcare

Accurate translations in healthcare are not just important; they can be a matter of life and death. Here are several reasons why sworn translation is indispensable in this field:

1. Ensuring Patient Safety

Miscommunication due to inaccurate translations can lead to serious medical errors, including incorrect treatments or prescriptions. Sworn translations help mitigate these risks by ensuring that critical information is conveyed accurately.

2. Legal Compliance

Many healthcare regulations require that patient documents be translated and certified to comply with local laws and international standards. This ensures that healthcare providers are meeting their legal obligations and protecting patient rights.

3. Enhancing Patient Understanding

Clear communication is essential for informed consent and treatment adherence. Sworn translations help ensure that patients fully understand their medical conditions, treatment options, and any potential risks involved.

4. Facilitating International Collaboration

As healthcare becomes more globalized, professionals often collaborate across borders. Accurate translations of research, medical publications, and patient data facilitate this collaboration, promoting better health outcomes.

The Sworn Translation Process in Healthcare

The process of sworn translation in the healthcare field involves several key steps:

1. Selecting a Qualified Translator

Choosing a translator with expertise in medical terminology and healthcare regulations is essential. The translator should be fluent in both the source and target languages and familiar with the specific context of the documents being translated.

2. Translation and Formatting

Once engaged, the translator will produce a translation that adheres to the legal and formatting requirements of the healthcare setting. This may include maintaining the original document's layout and ensuring compliance with industry standards.

3. Certification of the Translation

After completing the translation, the translator will provide a certification, which typically includes:

The translator’s name and qualifications

The date of the translation

A statement affirming the accuracy of the work

This certification is crucial for ensuring that the translation is accepted in medical and legal contexts.

Challenges in Sworn Translation for Healthcare

While sworn translation is critical, it presents unique challenges:

1. Navigating Medical Jargon

Medical terminology can be complex and varies between languages. Translators must have a deep understanding of both medical language and the cultural context to ensure accurate translations.

2. Managing Sensitive Information

Healthcare documents often contain sensitive personal information. Translators must be aware of confidentiality requirements and ensure that data protection laws are adhered to.

3. Maintaining Accuracy Under Pressure

In healthcare settings, timely translations may be required. Translators must balance the need for speed with the necessity of maintaining high accuracy to ensure patient safety.

Conclusion

Sworn translation is a crucial service in the healthcare industry, facilitating effective communication and enhancing patient safety. Its emphasis on legal compliance and accuracy ensures that vital medical information is conveyed clearly across languages and cultures. As the global healthcare landscape continues to evolve, the demand for certified sworn translators will only grow.

For healthcare providers, investing in sworn translation services is not merely advisable; it is essential. Ensuring that every document is accurately translated can ultimately be the key to delivering quality care and protecting patient rights.

For more information about sworn translation services, visit PEC Translation's Sworn Translation Services or explore our home page.

[uppercervicalcarehq]

Why Choose Upper Cervical Chiropractic in Houston?

Precision and Gentle Care: Upper Cervical Chiropractors use advanced diagnostic tools and gentle techniques to identify and correct misalignments. This approach is precise and non-invasive, making it suitable for individuals of all ages, from infants to the elderly.

Holistic Health: By addressing the root cause of health issues rather than just treating symptoms, Upper Cervical Chiropractic care promotes overall well-being. Many patients report significant improvements in their quality of life, including better sleep, increased energy, and enhanced immune function.

Chronic Conditions: Upper cervical chiropractic offers a promising alternative for those suffering from chronic conditions that have not responded well to other forms of treatment. Conditions like fibromyalgia, vertigo, and multiple sclerosis have shown improvement with this specialized care.

The Upper Cervical Chiropractic Experience in Houston

When you step into an Upper Cervical Chiropractic clinic in Houston, you can expect a personalized and thorough approach to your health. Here's what typically happens during your visit:

Comprehensive Evaluation: Your chiropractor will conduct a detailed evaluation, including a health history review and specific diagnostic imaging to assess the alignment of your cervical spine.

Customized Care Plan: Based on your evaluation results, your chiropractor will develop a tailored care plan. This plan may include precise adjustments, lifestyle recommendations, and exercises to support your recovery and health goals.

Gentle Adjustments: Unlike traditional chiropractic adjustments that may involve forceful movements, Upper Cervical adjustments are gentle and precise. The goal is to restore alignment without causing discomfort.

Real Stories, Real Results

Many Houstonians have experienced life-changing benefits from Upper Cervical Chiropractic care. Here are a few testimonials from local patients:

Sarah M.: "After years of suffering from migraines, I finally found relief with Upper Cervical Chiropractic. The gentle adjustments have made a world of difference in my daily life."

John D.: "I was skeptical at first, but after seeing how much my neck pain improved, I became a believer. The care I received was personalized and effective."

Finding Your Upper Cervical Chiropractor in Houston

If you're ready to explore the benefits of Upper Cervical Chiropractic care, Houston is home to many skilled practitioners. Take the time to research and find a chiropractor who specializes in this technique and has a track record of helping patients achieve their health goals.

Conclusion

In the vibrant city of Houston, Upper Cervical Chiropractic care is helping residents unlock their potential for optimal health and well-being. By focusing on the alignment of the atlas and axis, this specialized care offers a holistic approach to wellness that addresses the root causes of many health issues. Whether you're dealing with chronic pain or simply seeking to enhance your overall health, Upper Cervical Chiropractic might be the key to unlocking a healthier, happier you.

Embrace the journey to better health and discover the transformative power of Upper Cervical Chiropractic care in Houston today!

[avvayphotoshoot]

News from Spartanburg Chiropractic

At Upper Cervical Chiropractic, we believe in educating our patients as much as they need to know. If you're searching for a chiropractor who can help you live a healthier lifestyle and enhance your quality of life, look no further.

You will discover how chiropractic therapy may enhance your life and keep it as healthy as possible for many years to come with each visit to our office.In addition, we offer you and your family up to date on the newest chiropractic news with our semi-monthly blog, which features practical advice.

[pilvandrionkopen]

De Kosten van Euthanasie voor Honden (Wat Kost Euthanasie Hond)

Euthanasie Hond

In de hedendaagse wereld, waar onze harige metgezellen een bijzondere plek in ons hart innemen, kan het onderwerp euthanasie voor honden (Euthanasie Hond) een gevoelig maar essentieel aspect zijn van verantwoord huisdierbezit. Het is belangrijk om in te gaan op de factoren die bijdragen aan de kosten die gepaard gaan met deze humane maar uitdagende beslissing. Euthanasie Hond

Euthanasie voor honden (Euthanasia for dogs) is een dienst die wordt verleend door dierenartsen om het lijden van onze geliefde huisdieren te verlichten wanneer ze worden geconfronteerd met ongeneeslijke ziekte, ernstige pijn of een aanzienlijk verminderde levenskwaliteit. De kosten van dit proces kunnen variëren op basis van verschillende factoren.

Euthanasie Hond

Ten eerste speelt de grootte en het gewicht van de hond een rol bij het bepalen van de benodigde dosis euthanasie medicatie. Grotere honden hebben mogelijk meer medicatie nodig, wat de algehele kosten kan beïnvloeden. Bovendien kan de gekozen methode voor euthanasie, of het nu gaat om een injectie of een intraveneuze oplossing, de prijs beïnvloeden.

Verder kan de geografische locatie van de dierenkliniek van invloed zijn op de algehele kosten. Stedelijke gebieden hebben vaak hogere kosten voor levensonderhoud, wat kan leiden tot verhoogde tarieven voor diergeneeskundige diensten.

Het is cruciaal voor huisdiereigenaren om openlijk te communiceren met hun dierenarts over de kosten van de procedure, zodat ze volledig geïnformeerd en voorbereid zijn. Sommige dierenklinieken bieden pakketten aan die mogelijk extra diensten bevatten, zoals crematie- of begraafopties, die kunnen bijdragen aan de totale kosten.

In Nederland is waardevolle informatie over de kosten van euthanasie voor honden essentieel voor huisdiereigenaren. Het is belangrijk om een open communicatie met de dierenarts te onderhouden om volledig geïnformeerd te zijn over de kosten van de procedure en eventuele bijkomende diensten.

Samengevat is euthanasie voor honden een diep persoonlijke en emotionele beslissing voor huisdiereigenaren. Het begrijpen van de factoren die de kosten beïnvloeden, het bespreken van opties met de dierenarts en goed geïnformeerd zijn over beschikbare diensten zijn cruciale stappen bij het omgaan met dit uitdagende aspect van huisdierbezit.

[taqato-alim]

Analysis of: "Adverse effects of homeopathy: A systematic review of published case reports and case series" (2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd)

PDF-Download: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcp.12026

Here is a summary of the key points:

The document is a systematic review that critically evaluated evidence on adverse effects of homeopathy.

It identified 1,159 patients experiencing adverse effects reported in 38 primary case reports and case series.

Direct adverse effects included allergic reactions, intoxications, organ failure and death from homeopathic remedies.

Indirect adverse effects occurred when homeopathy replaced conventional medical care.

Rhus toxicodendron was the most commonly implicated remedy.

Mechanisms included allergies, toxicity from heavy metals, and substitution of effective treatments.

Risks existed even from very low potencies below 12C due to remedy ingredients and allergic reactions.

Intoxications from arsenic, mercury and other toxins in remedies caused acute and persistent harm.

Substitution of homeopathy for conventional care indirectly exacerbated serious conditions.

The review provided an evidence-based perspective on homeopathy safety issues and risks.

Clinicians should consider potential adverse effects, especially with serious conditions.

Reporting is likely incomplete so actual incidence of harm is uncertain.

In summary, the document systematically reviewed case evidence that homeopathy poses risks of adverse health impacts which practitioners and patients should be aware of.

Here is a summary of the key points from the document:

The aim of the systematic review was to critically evaluate evidence from case reports and case series regarding adverse effects of homeopathy.

38 primary reports met the inclusion criteria, describing a total of 1159 patients who experienced adverse effects from homeopathy.

30 reports described direct adverse effects from homeopathic remedies. Eight reported indirect adverse effects caused by substituting conventional medicine with homeopathy.

Direct adverse effects ranged from mild to severe, including allergic reactions, intoxications, cancers, bullous pemphigoid, organ failure, and four deaths.

Indirect adverse effects included deterioration of conditions when homeopathy replaced conventional treatments.

Rhus toxicodendron was the most frequently implicated homeopathic remedy in adverse effects.

Adverse effects were caused by allergic reactions, ingestion of toxic substances in low potencies, and substitution of conventional care.

There is a risk of indirect harm when homeopathy is used to treat serious conditions instead of conventional medicine.

Reporting of adverse effects is likely incomplete. The review has limitations due to the quality of primary reports.

Clinicians should be aware of risks associated with homeopathy, particularly for serious conditions usually requiring conventional treatment.

Based on its content and structure, I would categorize this document as a systematic review.

Key evidence that supports this genre classification:

The introduction clearly states the aim is to conduct a systematic review of evidence from case reports and case series on adverse effects of homeopathy.

It describes the methodology used, including databases searched, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and assessment of causality.

It presents the results in a structured manner, summarizing the number and types of primary reports included, adverse effects reported, implicated remedies, and causative mechanisms.

It discusses limitations of the evidence and its own review comprehensively.

It concludes by synthesizing the implications and conclusions that can be drawn based on the systematic compilation and analysis of available data.

It follows the structure typical of systematic reviews in medicine, with sections on introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusions.

It focuses on critically evaluating and synthesizing existing research literature on a specific topic, rather than presenting new original research findings.

Based on these factors, I am confident the genre of this document is a systematic review, which aims to provide an objective, comprehensive summary of current evidence related to a research question by identifying, appraising and synthesizing all relevant studies.

Here are some potential stakeholders that could be affected by this systematic review, along with an evaluation of how they may be impacted:

Homeopathy practitioners - Could challenge their view that homeopathy is always safe. May need to consider risks especially for serious conditions.

Homeopathy advocacy/trade groups - Findings contradict safety claims, challenge promotion as completely risk-free. May fuel more controversy over risks.

Homeopathy patients - Provide important information about potential risks to weigh against benefits. Could influence treatment decisions and reporting of adverse effects.

Conventional medicine community - Findings align with more skeptical view of risks, add credibility to concerns over substitution for conventional care.

Regulatory agencies - Evidence could influence guidance/warnings on risks, impact on future regulation depending on jurisdiction.

Health providers - Heighten awareness of need to consider risks/safety issues when patients use or want to substitute homeopathy.

Research groups - Findings add to evidence base on the need for objective evaluation of safety claims. May interest funders of future research.

Overall, while potentially controversial for strong advocates, the document provides a more balanced and evidence-based perspective for most stakeholders. Patients and providers are likely best served by its objective evaluation of risks supported by published cases. Regulators and researchers may find it has the most impact on guidance, policy or funding decisions.

Here is a summary of the key points from the document in relation to adverse effects from homeopathy:

The systematic review aimed to critically evaluate evidence from case reports and case series on adverse effects of homeopathy.

A total of 1159 patients experiencing adverse effects from 38 primary reports meeting the inclusion criteria were identified.

Adverse effects ranged from mild to severe, and included allergic reactions, intoxications, organ failure, cancers and four deaths.

Direct adverse effects were attributed to homeopathic remedies themselves, while indirect effects resulted from substituting conventional care with homeopathy.

Rhus toxicodendron was the most frequently implicated remedy in adverse effect cases.

Mechanisms included allergic reactions and toxicity from heavy metals or other substances used in some remedies.

Underreporting of adverse effects is likely, so actual incidence is uncertain based on available evidence.

Risk of indirect harm increases when homeopathy is used instead of conventional medicine for serious conditions.

Clinicians should be aware of potential risks, especially considering limitations of evidence on safety claims.

In summary, the review found substantive published case evidence that homeopathy can cause adverse health effects, from mild to potentially life-threatening, both directly and indirectly when substituted for standard medical care. It brings an empirical perspective highlighting the need for balanced consideration of risks.

Here is a summary of key points from the document related to indirect harm from homeopathy:

Indirect harm referred to adverse effects caused by substituting conventional medical care with ineffective homeopathic remedies.

Eight cases reported indirect adverse outcomes such as deterioration of underlying conditions.

Examples included worsening of pulmonary allergy, sarcoidosis glomerulonephritis, heart failure and atopic dermatitis.

Indirect harm posed risks especially when serious/life-threatening conditions were treated with homeopathy rather than conventional medicines.

Substitution of effective therapies could lead to adverse outcomes like sepsis, pneumonia, meningitis or even death.

It highlighted the risks associated with treating medical conditions beyond self-limiting minor issues using unproven remedies.

There is a need for homeopaths to be adequately trained to avoid such harmful substitution of standard medical care.

The review emphasized how using homeopathy in place of evidence-based treatments could indirectly cause serious harm or exacerbation of underlying diseases for which homeopathy provided no real therapeutic benefit. Proper medical evaluation and practitioners were seen as critical to avoiding such indirect risks.

Here is a summary of points from the document related to low potencies in homeopathic remedies:

Many of the case reports implicated remedies prepared at potencies below 12C, which is the point where the likelihood of a single molecule being present approaches zero.

This suggests that even extremely diluted remedies can potentially cause adverse effects in susceptible individuals.

Allergic reactions were cited as one causal mechanism, and these can occur with very low levels of allergenic substances.

Cases of toxic effects and heavy metal poisoning implicated remedies containing arsenic, mercury, bromine and other toxic substances, even at low potencies.

The review was unable to distinguish many reports in terms of potency level used, practitioner qualifications, etc., limiting insights into risk factors.

However, the evidence presented suggests low potencies should not be assumed safe or free of risk, especially in individual susceptible cases.

In summary, the document highlights that a significant number of adverse effect cases involved homeopathic remedies prepared at very low potencies, below 12C. This calls into question assumptions of absolute safety at high dilutions, and indicates certain susceptible individuals may still face risks even from extremely diluted preparations containing known toxins.

Here is a summary of points from the document related to intoxications from homeopathy:

Intoxications were listed as one of the causal mechanisms of direct adverse effects from homeopathic remedies.

Several cases describe toxic effects attributed to ingestion of heavy metals like arsenic, mercury or iron which are commonly used in some homeopathic preparations.

Intoxication cases involved arsenic bromide, arsenic sulfuratum flavum, mercurius solubilis, mercurius bichloratus, and mercurius corrosivus sublimatus homeopathic remedies.

Reported toxic signs and symptoms included arsenical keratosis and cancer, metabolic acidosis, neuropathy, and severe acute tubulointerstitial nephritis.

Some intoxication cases required hospitalization or resulted in lingering effects like persistent neuropathy.

An unusual case involved acute bromate intoxication from a dose prescribed by a homeopath.

Low potencies of remedies were still capable of causing toxic effects in susceptible individuals.

In summary, the review identified multiple published case reports of homeopathic remedy intoxications presenting as acute or long-term toxicity. Heavy metals used in some remedies posed risks of adverse health impacts even at diluted potencies, highlighting a potential mechanism of direct adverse effects.

Here is a summary of the key points from the document in relation to persistent neuropathy from homeopathy:

One of the case reports described a case of acute bromate intoxication from a homeopathic remedy.

Signs and symptoms of toxicity included metabolic acidosis.

Importantly, the patient experienced lingering effects in the form of persistent neuropathy after the acute poisoning.

This case highlighted that some adverse effects from homeopathic intoxications may not simply be acute, but can cause long-term or persistent health issues.

Neuropathy can be a sign of heavy metal poisoning from substances like bromine, arsenic or mercury used in some homeopathic remedies.

The document was limited by a lack of detail on long-term outcomes in many reports of intoxications.

But this case provided an example of how even an isolated exposure to toxicity from a homeopathic remedy preparation could lead to persistent health impairment.

In summary, while most adverse effects reported were acute, this case demonstrated that homeopathy has the potential in some instances to cause chronic, ongoing neurological damage like neuropathy through a toxic mechanism - not just transient acute effects.

It's difficult to definitively evaluate this document in relation to "consensus" without more context. However, based on some additional research, here are a few observations:

The document's conclusions that homeopathy can cause adverse effects and substitution poses risks are consistent with other systematic reviews that have found increased risks compared to placebo.

However, its findings contradict conclusions from advocates/proponents of homeopathy that claim it is completely safe with no adverse effects.

Major medical organizations like FDA and WHO acknowledge some reported adverse effects but do not take a definitive stance on risks.

There is no clear consensus in the broader medical community on risks, as homeopathy's efficacy itself remains controversial.

Within alternative/complementary medicine research circles though, reviews documenting adverse effects have been published and the findings here align with a cautious interpretation.

So in summary - while controversial within some communities that strongly advocate homeopathy, the document's findings are consistent with the more empirical/evidence-based perspective emerging in systematic research on this topic, even if full consensus has not been reached. It adopts a careful interpretation acknowledging limitations, rather than dismissing risks outright.

Overall, while notable dissent exists, the document seems reasonably well-aligned with the general themes and cautiously open perspective found in reviews from research groups objectively examining the empirical evidence base around homeopathy's risks and benefits.

Based on its content and structure, I would evaluate this document as:

Science rather than fiction: It critically analyzes and synthesizes empirical case reports/series, rather than presenting conjectural ideas.

Empirical rather than anecdotal: It systematically compiles and evaluates objective reports of adverse medical events, rather than isolated subjective experiences.

Fact rather than opinion: It relies on published case evidence and aims to objectively assess this, rather than advocating opinion-based perspectives.

Objective rather than subjective: It takes an impartial, evidence-based approach to evaluating risks rather than advocating particular views on homeopathy.

Some key factors supporting this evaluation:

It follows a scientific methodology of systematically searching, including/excluding evidence.

Data comes from published case reports meeting defined scientific criteria rather than individual impressions.

Analysis focuses on objective assessment of causality rather than subjective speculation.

Conclusions are careful and caveated based on limitations of evidence rather than strong claims.

Tone is impartial rather than advocacy-oriented in discussing implications.

Therefore, while not presenting original research findings, the document adheres closely to empirical, fact-based and objective aspects of the scientific genre in its systematic compilation and critical analysis of available case evidence.

Here are some logical fallacies I did not identify in this systematic review document:

No appeal to authority - Analysis is based on evidence, not claims of expert status.

No ad hominem arguments - No personal attacks on individuals or groups made.

No straw man - Fails to misrepresent other perspectives to make them easier to refute.

No false dichotomy - Does not frame debate as an either/or choice when multiple views possible.

No slippery slope - Doesn't argue minor action inevitably leads to extreme consequence.

No post hoc fallacy - Doesn't assume cause simply because one event preceded another.

No composition/division - Properly considers evidence collectively and does not overgeneralize.

No argument from ignorance - Doesn't claim something proven true just because not proven false.

Overall, I did not find any clear logical fallacies in the systematic review's methods or reasoning processes. It adheres closely to scientific principles of objectively compiling and critically analyzing empirical evidence using standardized methodology and caveated conclusions. The limitation acknowledgements further strengthen rational basis of analysis and prevent overly broad claims. While controversial findings for some, I did not identify any logical flaws that would invalidate core conclusions drawn regarding potential adverse effects.

Here are some common evaluation criteria for a systematic review along with my evaluation of this document based on each criteria:

Clear aim/objective - clearly stated as critically evaluating evidence for adverse effects of homeopathy.

Appropriate methodology - methodology section describes search strategy and criteria in sufficient detail.

Comprehensive literature search - five databases searched from inception without limits.

Clear inclusion/exclusion criteria - criteria presented for case reports and case series.

Assessment of quality of primary studies - causality assessed based on described criteria.

Sufficient analysis and synthesis of results - results thoroughly summarized and discussed.

Addresses limitations - several limitations addressed including possible underreporting.

Valid conclusions - conclusions follow reasonably from presented evidence and analysis.

Implications for research/practice - discusses implications around risk awareness and serious conditions.

Overall, the document meets important criteria for completeness and quality of a systematic review based on the appropriateness of its objective, methodology, search strategy, analysis and consideration of limitations. The reviewers appropriately synthesized available evidence and drew valid conclusions based on their analysis.

dqqeeFVRSVsbn5NNvw7u

[treatnow]

BRAIN WOUND UPDATE #6: Other Than Honorable (OTH) and Relation to BLAST, TBI / PTSD

BRINGING YOU CURRENT INFORMATION ABOUT HOW TO HELP TREAT AND HEAL BRAIN WOUNDS: CONCUSSIONS, TBI, PTSD This report brings you information about how service members are being separated from the service with Other Than Honorable (OTH) discharges. One organization, USJAG.org, is succeeding at ensuring that injured, ill, or wounded active-duty service members are separated with benefits, honors, and dignity intact.

  ********************* SGT Jerrald Jensen is one of over 100,000 service members issued Other Than Honorable discharges since 9/11. The majority are combat veterans, most with undiagnosed or mis-diagnosed brain wounds. A Pulitzer Prize-winning series catalogs SGT Jensen's travails, along with multiple others caught up in a surreal legal web that is merciless, even when confronted with documented BLAST injuries and diagnosable brain wounds. Though changes in law may allow a Veteran with an OTH to get some health benefits, the losses are punitive and life-altering. OTH, bad conduct, or dishonorable discharges can prevent employment, ability to obtain a security clearance, and assuredly taint self-image and mental attitudes. While the system needs retributive justice for certain kinds of conduct, the use of diminished mental capacity due to brain injuries to expedite separation from service is a travesty. This tragic misuse of military justice continues as more details come to light about the BLAST injuries sustained by combat veterans. Even firing your own weapon, much less larger caliber weapons and M777 howitzers, can cause brain damage. As we wrote about the Marine Battalion in Iraq, the damage done to dozens of Marines resulted from unprecedented combat. 'The artillery battalion “fired more rounds in five months in Raqqa, Syria, than any other Marine artillery battalion, or any Marine or Army battalion, since the Vietnam War.” During a Marine Corps Times roundtable discussion in 2018, the former senior enlisted adviser to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said 35,000 artillery rounds were used to kill ISIS terrorists “by the dozens." 'For comparison, 60,000 rounds were fired by the Marines and the Army during the First Gulf War. And during the initial invasion of the Iraq War, over 34,000 artillery shells were fired." Unprecedented firepower, and unprecedented and undocumented brain damage. True, mental health problems accompanied that wounding, but root cause analysis would have found mitigating circumstances for the behavior that followed. The military is not alone in downplaying or ignoring the ravages of repeated brain wounding. The International Conference on Concussion in Sport once again failed in October last year to recognize brain wounding as a potential cause of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Even, perhaps especially, the world of sports appears willfully clueless about the links between brain wounding and physical, mental, and behavioral deterioration. Dylan Hartley, former Captain of the all-England rugby team, is too familiar with brain wounds from his playing days. He is not part of the suit being brought a group of former players against World Rugby, the Rugby Football Union and the Welsh Rugby Union, for "failure to protect (the claimants) from the risks caused by concussions". He did, nevertheless, experience the plethora of traumas that led to his feeling "virtually broken" prior to his treatment and transformation with Hyperbaric Oxygenation in Dubai. Rugby worldwide is awakening to the long-term damage that can be inflicted on the brain playing high-level impact sports. They are following a path being trod in many sports. The NFL is still not able to come to grips with the documented links between head trauma and the post-mortem proof of a life lived with degenerative CTE: 345 out of 376 brains of dead former NFL players riddled with brain wounds caused by CTE. Hundreds of former college athletes are suing the NCAA. The claims are that “For years (the NCAA) has kept players like Matthew Gee and the public in the dark about an epidemic that was slowly killing college athletes,” Alana Gee's lawsuit said. “Long after they played their last game, they are left with a series of neurological conditions that could slowly strangle their brains. . . . problems ranging from headaches to depression and, sometimes, early onset Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease." BLAST injury, contact sports, falls, assaults, strokes, concussions. In one sense, Other Than Honorable discharges are the least of a Veterans problems alongside the slow deterioration of the brain. As we continue to insist: Heal Brains. Stop Suicides. Restore Lives. Use a proven, scientifically validated treatment: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. TreatNOW. Information provided by TreatNOW.org does not constitute a medical recommendation. It is intended for informational purposes only, and no claims, either real or implied, are being made. Heal Brains. Stop Suicides. Restore Lives. TreatNOW   Read the full article

[ourbygoneage]

Chapter 27: The Debate Verse 2

Tailor took a deep breath and interjected in the heated debate. "Can I say something? I think both of you are missing the point."

Rachelle and Noah looked at him, curious to hear what he had to say.

"I've been listening to your arguments, and while both have valid points, they both assume that government is about control. But it's not. It should be about facilitating the functions of the community," Tailor said.

Rachelle and Noah were surprised by Tailor's stance, and they both looked at him with newfound respect.

"I'm a trans man," Tailor continued. "And my experience with medical professionals has shown me that governing bodies tend to focus on violating bodily autonomy first, and building a community later."

Noah nodded in agreement. "I understand what you're saying, Tailor. And I agree that the government should built service-first, but what about ignorance? Should we leave people to make dumb, sometimes dangerous choices?"

"People aren't built to know all the things," Tailor replied. "I do believe the conclusions of experts in their field should be respected and made available, but science is a moving target, and even a council of experts can make a catastrophic mistake. Why take responsibility from people? It just slows everything down with this blame-debate."

Rachelle chimed in. "But what about minority voices? How do we ensure that people are protected from the careless actions, or inaction, of the majority?"

Tailor thought for a moment. "If the government fosters an attitude of enablement and transparency, maybe society won't be so hung up on the right way to live? Maybe if government is more of an infrastructure than a shepherd, we'll learn to be less paranoid about replacement, and more focused on a healthy level of skepticism and reflection?"

[healthchoicerhodeisland]

Watch the Livestream Link in bio Sunday, March 5 4:00 p.m. “Healthcare American Style” John Abramson Harvard Medical School 8:00 p.m. “Anthony Fauci and the Public Health Establishment” Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Author, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health ______ Monday, March 6 4:00 p.m. “Big Pharma and Big Government” Jordan Schachtel Investigative Journalist 8:00 p.m. “What’s in the Pfizer Documents?” Naomi Wolf CEO, The Daily Clout ______ Tuesday, March 7 4:00 p.m. “Big Pharma and the Chinese Communist Party” Brian T. Kennedy The American Strategy Group 8:00 p.m. “Big Pharma and the Opioid Epidemic” Gerald Posner Author, Pharma: Greed, Lies, and the Poisoning of America #healthpolicy #healthfreedom #healthchoice #medicalfreedom #informedconsent #bebrave #pharma #criticalthinking #hillsdale https://www.instagram.com/p/CpYJ8ZEuKE5/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[ecgkid]

Catheter ablation for cardiac arrythmias & atrial fibrillation

[timdickert-blog]

Patient Care vs. Potential Harm - Balancing the Hippocratic Oath

Navigating the ethics of medicine This concept is derived from the Hippocratic Oath, a guiding principle of medicine that dates back to ancient Greece.While the exact phrase “first, do no harm” (“primum non nocere” in Latin) is not found in the original oath, it hasbecome a central tenet of medical ethics. “First, do no harm” is a simplified and commonly used version of the principleof…

[annabelle--cane]

mwah kissing you on the mouth you’re wonderful and you deserve better and I hope you have an excellent day

unrelated may I have some eggnog

of course you can. 🥚🥛. heads up I niehter cook my eggnog nor add alcohol so you have to make peace with the slim possibility of salmonella. #informedconsent

[welcome2grlwrld]

#informedconsent #ihatecorn #cornkillslove #anticorn #prolove #exoduscry #fightthenewdrug #ftnd #thatsnotlove #thatsanaddiction #notconsent #consentmatter #women #protectkids #protectwomen #protectboys #protectgirls #internetsafety

#onlinesafety they're masturbating to the #childexploitationprevention in these #stopexploiting #godlovesyou #jesuslovesyou #godloves ships

[treatnow]

BRAIN WOUND UPDATE #5: Concussion, BLAST, TBI, CTE

BRINGING YOU CURRENT INFORMATION ABOUT HOW TO HELP TREAT AND HEAL BRAIN WOUNDS: CONCUSSIONS, TBI, PTSD This report brings you information about how HBOT can be used to help with symptoms due to BLAST damage, and advances in seeing "invisible" wounds. Remember: despite loose talk about how "almost all mild Traumatic Brain Injuries heal themselves," evidence shows that 25% - 30% of TBIs lead to lifetime complications. ********************* Early Brain Amyloid Accumulation at PET in Military Instructors Exposed to Subconcussive Blast Injuries In this prospective study from January 2020 to December 2021, military instructors who were routinely exposed to repeated blast events were evaluated at two different points: baseline (before blast exposure from breacher or grenade) and approximately 5 months after baseline (after blast exposure). Age-matched healthy control participants not exposed to blasts and without a history of brain injury were evaluated at similar two points. In the blast-exposed participants, four brain regions showed significantly increased amyloid deposition after blast exposure. . . . No amyloid deposition was observed in the control participants. . . . Our results may have direct clinical implications: if the individuals that are at risk for developing amyloid-related neurotoxicity can be identified, therapies to clear amyloid β in the brain might reduce or slow the development of long-term secondary traumatic encephalopathy. New AI tool can spot ‘invisible’ brain damage in college athletes A new AI tool developed by NYU researchers can effectively spot brain changes that happen from repeated head injuries. Specifically, it can pick up on injuries that traditional medical imaging misses. Evidence is now starting to show that that repeated head impacts, even if they seem to be mild at first, may lead to cognitive decline over time. Advanced MRI can identify microscopic changes in brain structure from head trauma, but the scans yield a lot of data that can be hard to examine. This new technology utilizes machine learning to accurately compare the brains of male athletes who played contact sports like football and non-contact sports like track and field. The researchers studied hundreds of brain images from 81 male college athletes, 36 contact sport players (mainly football players) and 45 non-contact sport athletes (mainly runners and baseball players). The team found repeated head impacts with small structural changes in the brains of contact-sport athletes. Most interestingly, none of the participants had been diagnosed with a concussion. UK issues The UK Concussion Guidelines for Non-Elite (Grassroots) Sport "If in Doubt, Sit Them Out." Amateur sports in the UK now have updated Guidelines aimed at identifying and improving the handling of concussions in amateur sports. Teams can be part of a two-year programme of research into concussion in grassroots sport, using an app to track the symptoms of injury and their treatment. According to the guidelines, anyone who sustains a concussion should not play contact sport for 21 days and should not return to any form of training for 14 days. VA Neurologist Terminated Following Care Denials Mary Jo Lanska, MD, has been terminated by the Veterans Administration (VA) after an investigation by KARE 11 in Minneapolis revealed a pattern of misdiagnosis and benefit denials spanning decades, the outlet reported. Since 2002, Lanska has evaluated more than 1,000 veterans at the Tomah VA in Wisconsin -- 600 of whom were denied benefits and are now eligible for re-testing by the VA. An earlier review of a "random selection of Dr. Lanska's benefits exams found 31% were done incorrectly," according to KARE 11. Many of those who had care denied were evaluated for traumatic brain injuries. They will now have their cases reviewed and could be granted backdated benefits. The House Committee on Veterans Affairs recently called for the Inspector General to investigate a "systemic failure" to provide adequate care for traumatic brain injuries to veterans across the nation. Lanska's firing comes after a larger pattern of denials was revealed starting in 2015, and led to a national review of mishandled compensation claims for similar reasons. Alpha Cognition Receives Army Medical Research Grant for Study on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) from Blast Induced Functional Deficit and Brain Pathology Alpha Cognition Inc., a biopharmaceutical company developing novel therapeutics for debilitating neurodegenerative disorders, is pleased to announce the that it has been awarded a $750,000 grant from the Army Medical Research and Material Command (AMRMC) for a pre-clinical study on the use of ALPHA-1062 Intranasal (IN) to reduce blast mTBI induced functional deficit and brain abnormalities. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of ALPHA-1062IN in reducing the adverse effects of repetitive blast induced-mTBI in pre-clinical models. A blast injury can lead to long-term functional issues and brain abnormalities, which can have a significant impact on the quality of life of those affected. “The body of evidence is growing to show that people who have suffered a TBI, even a mild TBI, are at greater risk of developing dementia in later life and are at risk for additional neurocognitive issues." An integral part of this research program will evaluate ALPHA-1062’s ability to reduce a toxic form of a brain protein known to be increased in this military relevant TBI model. . . . Accumulation of toxic Tau in the brain is linked to dementia progression, and was previously shown to be decreased by ALPHA-1062 in a separate pre-clinical model of moderate TBI. Information provided by TreatNOW.org does not constitute a medical recommendation. It is intended for informational purposes only, and no claims, either real or implied, are being made. Heal Brains. Stop Suicides. Restore Lives. TreatNOW     Read the full article