#infinite ai & infinite gpt

[ronelgomes]

Infinite AI GPT

With the help of the cutting-edge cloud-based app development platform Infinite AI GPT, you may produce and market your own cloud software tools. This advanced platform enables you to create apps as a product owner, offer them as affiliate bonuses, and much more. It has a history of six consecutive #1 sellers. Enter your questions and modify your app’s settings, including the title, URL, and logo. This is the first app in the world to utilize AI to create other applications that can be bought and sold to generate revenue. This is live, unrestricted access to the most successful business concept in the world. Please join the line, and don’t forget to thank someone as you enter.

[mereviews44]

Infinite AI GPT Review: Unlocking the Power of AI-Generated Apps for Profit

Introduction:

In today’s fast-paced digital world, staying ahead of the competition is crucial for online marketers and entrepreneurs. One breakthrough technology that has been transforming the landscape is Infinite AI GPT. In this in-depth review, we will delve into the capabilities of Infinite AI GPT and how it enables users to harness the power of AI to create and monetize their own cloud-based apps. Get ready to explore the limitless opportunities and profitability that Infinite AI GPT brings to the table.

Get Infinite AI & Infinite GPT Now

Infinite AI & Infinite GPT Overview

Vendor: Chris X

Product: Infinite AI & Infinite GPT

Launch Date: 2023-Jul-01

Launch Time: 11:00 EST

Front-End Price: $15

Niche : software

Support: Effective support

Refund: 30-Day Money Back Guarantee

Recommendation: Highly Recommended!

Official Website: Click here

Bonuses: Me Reviews Exclusive Bonuses (view only)

Unlocking the Potential of Infinite AI GPT:

Infinite AI GPT is a groundbreaking app-building software that leverages the capabilities of AI, specifically Chat-GPT, to generate cloud-based apps effortlessly. Unlike traditional methods that require extensive coding and development knowledge, Infinite AI GPT simplifies the entire process by eliminating the need for programming skills. This means anyone, regardless of technical expertise, can now build and monetize their own apps.

Why Choose Infinite AI GPT?

Accessibility and Ease of Use:

With Infinite AI GPT, you can create and launch your own cloud-based apps with just a few clicks. No coding or programming skills are required, as the software handles the app-building process for you. Simply enter your app settings and prompts, and watch as Infinite AI GPT generates a fully functional app that you can own and monetize.

Versatility and Profitability:

The potential to profit from Infinite AI GPT is limitless. As a product owner, you can sell your apps, offer them as affiliate bonuses, or use them to build a buyer’s list. Moreover, the software comes with case studies showcasing how users have generated substantial income as vendors and affiliates using this AI-powered technology.

Cloud-Based and Hosted:

Infinite AI GPT takes care of hosting your apps on its secure servers, ensuring 24/7 availability and seamless user experience. There’s no need to worry about managing hosting or dealing with technical complexities. You can focus on growing your business while the software handles the technical aspects.

AI-Powered Prompts:

Infinite AI GPT provides pre-loaded AI prompts that have been proven to generate profits. These prompts serve as a starting point and can be customized to fit your specific use case. Additionally, the software offers access to unlimited AI prompts, enabling you to continuously enhance and expand your app offerings.

Unleashing the Power of Infinite AI GPT:

By utilizing Infinite AI GPT, you gain a significant advantage over competitors still relying on outdated methods. The software empowers you to create AI-generated apps that are indistinguishable from professionally developed ones. With the ability to sell these apps, offer them as bonuses, or use them to drive traffic, you can unlock a wave of cash, productivity, and enjoyment in your online business.

Get Infinite AI & Infinite GPT Now

Pros:

Accessibility and Ease of Use:

Infinite AI GPT eliminates the need for coding or programming skills, making it accessible to users of all technical backgrounds. With its user-friendly interface, anyone can create and launch their own cloud-based apps effortlessly.

Versatility and Flexibility:

Infinite AI GPT offers endless possibilities for app creation and monetization. Users can sell their apps, offer them as bonuses, or use them to build a buyer’s list. The software allows for customization and provides access to unlimited AI prompts, enabling users to continuously enhance and expand their app offerings.

Time and Cost Efficiency:

By automating the app-building process, Infinite AI GPT saves users significant time and resources. There’s no need to invest in extensive development or hire expensive programmers. With just a few clicks, users can generate fully functional apps and focus on growing their business.

AI-Powered Prompts:

Infinite AI GPT provides pre-loaded AI prompts that have proven to generate profits. These prompts serve as a valuable starting point, assisting users in creating engaging and compelling app content. The software’s AI capabilities enable continuous learning and improvement, leading to higher app performance over time.

Cons:

Dependency on AI Technology:

While Infinite AI GPT simplifies the app-building process, it heavily relies on AI technology. In some cases, the generated apps may not meet the exact expectations or specific requirements of users. It’s important to understand the limitations and potential constraints associated with AI-generated content.

Lack of Full Control:

As users rely on Infinite AI GPT to generate their apps, they may have limited control over certain aspects of the app creation process. Customization options are available, but users may not have complete control over every single detail. This can be a trade-off for the convenience and time-saving benefits provided by the software.

Learning Curve:

Despite its user-friendly interface, there may still be a learning curve for users who are not familiar with app-building or AI technology. While the software simplifies the process, beginners may need to invest some time in understanding its features and functionalities to fully leverage its capabilities.

Potential Overreliance on AI:

As with any AI-powered tool, there is a risk of overreliance on the technology. While Infinite AI GPT is a powerful app-building solution, it’s important to maintain a balance between AI-generated content and human creativity. Incorporating personal expertise and judgment is crucial to deliver unique and exceptional app experiences.

It’s essential to consider both the advantages and disadvantages of using Infinite AI GPT to make an informed decision about its suitability for your specific needs and goals.

Conclusion:

Infinite AI GPT revolutionizes the way we build and monetize apps, thanks to the power of AI and the simplicity it brings to the process. This comprehensive review has explored the key features and benefits of Infinite AI GPT, highlighting its accessibility, profitability, and versatility. With Infinite AI GPT, you can tap into the limitless potential of AI-generated apps, transform your online business, and secure your place in the AI revolution.

Remember, embracing the future means staying ahead of the game. Don’t miss out on the opportunity to leverage Infinite AI GPT for maximum profits and business growth. Start building your own AI-powered app empire today!

Get Infinite AI & Infinite GPT Now

[nostalgebraist]

Honestly I'm pretty tired of supporting nostalgebraist-autoresponder. Going to wind down the project some time before the end of this year.

Posting this mainly to get the idea out there, I guess.

This project has taken an immense amount of effort from me over the years, and still does, even when it's just in maintenance mode.

Today some mysterious system update (or something) made the model no longer fit on the GPU I normally use for it, despite all the same code and settings on my end.

This exact kind of thing happened once before this year, and I eventually figured it out, but I haven't figured this one out yet. This problem consumed several hours of what was meant to be a relaxing Sunday. Based on past experience, getting to the bottom of the issue would take many more hours.

My options in the short term are to

A. spend (even) more money per unit time, by renting a more powerful GPU to do the same damn thing I know the less powerful one can do (it was doing it this morning!), or

B. silently reduce the context window length by a large amount (and thus the "smartness" of the output, to some degree) to allow the model to fit on the old GPU.

Things like this happen all the time, behind the scenes.

I don't want to be doing this for another year, much less several years. I don't want to be doing it at all.

----

In 2019 and 2020, it was fun to make a GPT-2 autoresponder bot.

[EDIT: I've seen several people misread the previous line and infer that nostalgebraist-autoresponder is still using GPT-2. She isn't, and hasn't been for a long time. Her latest model is a finetuned LLaMA-13B.]

Hardly anyone else was doing anything like it. I wasn't the most qualified person in the world to do it, and I didn't do the best possible job, but who cares? I learned a lot, and the really competent tech bros of 2019 were off doing something else.

And it was fun to watch the bot "pretend to be me" while interacting (mostly) with my actual group of tumblr mutuals.

In 2023, everyone and their grandmother is making some kind of "gen AI" app. They are helped along by a dizzying array of tools, cranked out by hyper-competent tech bros with apparently infinite reserves of free time.

There are so many of these tools and demos. Every week it seems like there are a hundred more; it feels like every day I wake up and am expected to be familiar with a hundred more vaguely nostalgebraist-autoresponder-shaped things.

And every one of them is vastly better-engineered than my own hacky efforts. They build on each other, and reap the accelerating returns.

I've tended to do everything first, ahead of the curve, in my own way. This is what I like doing. Going out into unexplored wilderness, not really knowing what I'm doing, without any maps.

Later, hundreds of others with go to the same place. They'll make maps, and share them. They'll go there again and again, learning to make the expeditions systematically. They'll make an optimized industrial process of it. Meanwhile, I'll be locked in to my own cottage-industry mode of production.

Being the first to do something means you end up eventually being the worst.

----

I had a GPT chatbot in 2019, before GPT-3 existed. I don't think Huggingface Transformers existed, either. I used the primitive tools that were available at the time, and built on them in my own way. These days, it is almost trivial to do the things I did, much better, with standardized tools.

I had a denoising diffusion image generator in 2021, before DALLE-2 or Stable Diffusion or Huggingface Diffusers. I used the primitive tools that were available at the time, and built on them in my own way. These days, it is almost trivial to do the things I did, much better, with standardized tools.

Earlier this year, I was (probably) one the first people to finetune LLaMA. I manually strapped LoRA and 8-bit quantization onto the original codebase, figuring out everything the hard way. It was fun.

Just a few months later, and your grandmother is probably running LLaMA on her toaster as we speak. My homegrown methods look hopelessly antiquated. I think everyone's doing 4-bit quantization now?

(Are they? I can't keep track anymore -- the hyper-competent tech bros are too damn fast. A few months from now the thing will be probably be quantized to -1 bits, somehow. It'll be running in your phone's browser. And it'll be using RLHF, except no, it'll be using some successor to RLHF that everyone's hyping up at the time...)

"You have a GPT chatbot?" someone will ask me. "I assume you're using AutoLangGPTLayerPrompt?"

No, no, I'm not. I'm trying to debug obscure CUDA issues on a Sunday so my bot can carry on talking to a thousand strangers, every one of whom is asking it something like "PENIS PENIS PENIS."

Only I am capable of unplugging the blockage and giving the "PENIS PENIS PENIS" askers the responses they crave. ("Which is ... what, exactly?", one might justly wonder.) No one else would fully understand the nature of the bug. It is special to my own bizarre, antiquated, homegrown system.

I must have one of the longest-running GPT chatbots in existence, by now. Possibly the longest-running one?

I like doing new things. I like hacking through uncharted wilderness. The world of GPT chatbots has long since ceased to provide this kind of value to me.

I want to cede this ground to the LLaMA techbros and the prompt engineers. It is not my wilderness anymore.

I miss wilderness. Maybe I will find a new patch of it, in some new place, that no one cares about yet.

----

Even in 2023, there isn't really anything else out there quite like Frank. But there could be.

If you want to develop some sort of Frank-like thing, there has never been a better time than now. Everyone and their grandmother is doing it.

"But -- but how, exactly?"

Don't ask me. I don't know. This isn't my area anymore.

There has never been a better time to make a GPT chatbot -- for everyone except me, that is.

Ask the techbros, the prompt engineers, the grandmas running OpenChatGPT on their ironing boards. They are doing what I did, faster and easier and better, in their sleep. Ask them.

[original-person]

First post on here let's go!!

SFW the only warning I can think of is argument?

I had a thought that made me want to try and write something with scaramouche

is probably gonna feel ooc? I don't think I know his character that well so most of this is based on what I deduced from YouTube videos and such.

BEWARE I HAVE NEVER WRITTEN ANYTHING OTHER THAT WHAT SCHOOL FORCED ME TO. ESPECIALLY SOMETHING WITH G/T IN IT. (I've used chat gpt to check gramatic mistakes so if anything blame the damn ai)

If you don't know what g/t is just search up giant/tiny

Note:I think this idea fits sagau soooo-

Angst and hurt/a little bit of comfort

Summary: you invite scara to your realm of solace (your room) to rest. Maybe you should have mentioned that you have another form besides your mortal looking one.

Scaramouche was sitting in his chair next to his desk, working on documents. His hand moved with the pen, the scribbling lightly echoing in the almost empty office. It would have been empty if not for you, looking out the window, staring at what used to be the sunset, now a starry sky.

You moved from the window towards the desk and behind the chair. You hugged Scara loosely around the neck and slowly rested your chin against his shoulder. He stopped his movements to not mess up the writing, put the pen down, and slightly turned his head to you.

"Is there any particular reason you're bothering me?" he asked, his tone irritated. Ignoring his tone, you knew he didn't mean it anyway, and you let out a tired sigh. "Didn't you do enough work already? You should rest." He scoffed, turning his attention back to the documents. "I don't require rest as humans do, and you know that. Besides, I'm not done yet."

Looking at the pile of papers, it seemed like it was going to take ages. "Well, I would have less if you knew how to do your own paperwork." Ah, you said that out loud. "But still, can't it wait? I want to be with you." Burying your head deeper into his shoulder and wrapping your arms tighter around him, Scara let out a sigh and put his hand on his forehead. "Great, Archon forbid you aren't with me for some time."

You stood up and sulked next to him. Scara furrowed his eyebrows and let out a big, annoyed sigh on purpose as he leaned back into his chair before getting up and stretching. Cracking his hand, he did feel sore, but he wouldn't tell you that. Jokes on him, you noticed anyway, and you lit up instantly with an idea popping up in your head.

The god glanced at their partner with a gentle, adoring smile. “Scara,” they said softly, reaching out their hand. “I’d like to show you something special.” Scara turned to them, crossing his arms. "What is it?" "That's a secret," you put your finger on his lips, "but it is going to help you rest."

Curiosity piqued, Scaramouche closed the distance between you, grasping your hand gently. "I somehow doubt that." You raised your other hand, and with a simple gesture, the air shimmered, and the room began to change. The familiar surroundings melted away, replaced by a realm—your realm. The realm unfolded like a dreamscape, an infinite expanse of tranquility that seemed to stretch on and on. Soft, ambient light bathed the surroundings in hues, creating an otherworldly pleasant glow.

Scaramouche almost forgot you were a god. Nowadays, it feels okay again, but it reminds him of when he first found out. Oh, how he felt betrayed. He felt worthless, only a mere plaything for you. But you assured him that you didn't see him that way. That you didn't come to Teyvat, to him, just to play god. No, you just wanted to experience it from their view.

“Welcome to the realm of solace,” you said, as he snapped back to reality from his thoughts, your voice resonating with warmth. The ground wasn't surprisingly smooth; rather, it felt like he was standing on a pile of pillows that seemed to shift subtly with each step. “This is a place where reality bends to offer peace and comfort. It’s where I retreat to find solace sometimes from the world.”

Scaramouche’s eyes widened in awe as he took in the sight. The atmosphere itself seemed to slowly wrap around him like a warm blanket. “Not like anything you’ve seen,” you continued with a hearty chuckle. “I also go here to sleep every night, so I guess that makes it my bedroom."

Scaramouche, still absorbing the strange beauty of the realm, nodded slowly. “It’s... incredible,” he said, his voice barely above a whisper. “Guess I don't need to doubt you anymore.”

As you settled onto the bed? Ground? Its softness enveloped you, your presence reassuring. “I hope you find it as comforting as I do,” you said, scooting a little closer to him. Scaramouche took a deep breath and let his body relax, trusting in the promise of solace, staring at the seemingly endless, changing ceiling that looked really far away. The gentle hum of the realm lulled you slowly into a deep sleep. For Scaramouche, the comfort was otherworldly, a stark contrast to when he sometimes tried to rest before, as he was quite sensitive to any sounds. But as he began listening to your light breaths, he found himself falling more into a deeper sleep.

As the night wore on, you, feeling an unprecedented sense of comfort and trust with Scara next to you, unconsciously began changing to your godly form, as you always did when you slept here. The change was seamless and silent, but it had an immediate impact on the bed's dimensions. Scaramouche stirred half-asleep, his eyes fluttered open, pushing down on the ground to sit up. His eyes widened in confusion as he glanced around. The realm's soft glow seemed to dim slightly, reality seeping back in as he noticed the absence of your familiar form beside him. Was he really sleeping so deeply? How?  Looking to where you were supposed to be, what he saw made him spring up in caution. Your comforting presence beside him had been replaced with a colossal figure, one that he did not recognize. Panic surged through him, and he bolted upright, his instincts screaming at him to run.

"Who—where?" His voice was a frantic whisper, his body trembling as he quickly turned his head in every direction for you. You were here with him, right? Where are you? Where did you go? Those thoughts were repeating in his mind that he didn't notice the slight stir the figure made.

You were drowsy, but sensing discomfort from Scara, as this realm allowed you to, you tiredly opened your eyes and saw him turning around, looking everywhere, before he felt eyes on him and locked eyes with you.

Shit. Shit, shit, shit. Scaramouche couldn't see you anywhere, and to make this considerably worse, the giant figure woke up, looking straight at him, looking almost at his very being. He felt his blood freeze in his body; he didn't think that was possible. Not wasting another second, he turned and sprinted. Can he even outrun it? Where is he running? Where are you? His breath is labored; it's hard to run on this plushy surface, almost falling at every step.

Your senses were flooded with Scaramouche's fear, and you reached out instinctively. He shouldn't be scared. Your hand, as gentle as it was large, moved towards Scaramouche to soothe him, to bring him back closer to you. But to Scaramouche, it was overwhelming.

Scaramouche’s mind raced as he stumbled, desperately trying to escape from the towering figure that had replaced the comforting presence he once knew. His heart pounded, not just from fear, but from a deep-seated sense of helplessness that he had tried so hard to bury. He hated feeling like a mere doll, a puppet whose strings could be pulled with little regard for his autonomy. The sensation of being so utterly powerless, so at the mercy of someone else, triggered memories—memories that he wishes he could forget. Memories of his early days, when he was first created and learned of his true nature. Back then, every interaction had seemed to confirm his worst fears: that he was nothing more than a plaything for a god's amusement.

The plush surface beneath him, which had seemed so inviting before, now felt like a trap, each step a reminder of his vulnerability. As he tripped, he cursed under his breath, the bitterness of past betrayals mixing with his current dread. “No, no, not again...” he muttered, struggling to get back on his feet.

You, now fully awake and aware of the distress you had caused, stopped in your tracks. Your hand hovered as you weren't sure what to do now, though intended to comfort, the hand seemed to loom over him like an ominous shadow. “Please, don't run,” your voice echoed softly, trying to cut through his panic.

But for Scaramouche, the giant form was a stark and terrifying contrast to the familiar person he had come to trust. The overwhelming size of the hand, the massive gesture, only reinforced his feeling of being a puppet caught in a storm of uncontrollable forces. He had always loathed the feeling of helplessness, of being manipulated—that's why he became a Harbinger, after all—but this situation exacerbated those fears.

"Scaramouche," the figure called, their voice resonant and soothing, but it only heightened Scaramouche's panic. Scara's eyes widened in terror as the god’s enormous hand reached towards him. Instinctively, he struggled, wriggling against the closing fingers that covered him. The sensation was overwhelming; the figure’s hand, though surprisingly gentle, felt like an inescapable force.

Your head hurt. Your senses were overwhelmed with fear, the opposite of what Scara should have been feeling. "Scaramouche," your voice was firmer now, hoping to break through his panic.

“Let me go!” Scaramouche shouted, his voice strained as he tried to free himself. His breaths came in short, panicked gasps. His mind raced with so many thoughts, memories, and fears.

Knowing you should listen, to give him at least a little bit of sense of control, you brought your other hand to the one holding him and slowly opened it, fearing he might try and jump off. Scaramouche felt his stomach flip as he was turned around in the hand. As the hand opened, Scaramouche, now on his knees, looked up, feeling forced to. He once again locked eyes with you. His violet eyes, usually sharp and filled with defiance, were now wide and vulnerable. They blinked rapidly, trying to get rid of tears that threatened to spill. Each flutter of his eyelids was a silent struggle to hold onto reality and calm his racing thoughts. The blinking slowed, but his gaze remained intense, flickering with a mix of lingering fear and desperate hope.

You slowly lifted your hands, your eyes softening with guilt almost to the point of tears. "I'm so sorry, Scara." Recognition dawned in Scaramouche's eyes. He froze, his breath coming in ragged gasps. "You—what...?" Confusion consumed him.

The confusion quickly morphed into anger. Scaramouche’s eyes narrowed, and he clenched his trembling fists. "Let me down," he snapped, his voice rising. "Now."

You flinched at the sharpness of his tone, setting him down. He took a few cautious steps back, guilt weighing heavily on you. "I didn't mean to scare you," you said softly. "I thought it wouldn't matter—"

"Wouldn't matter?" Scaramouche cut you off. "How could something like this not matter?" His voice was sharp, cutting through the tranquility of the realm. "Did you think I wouldn't find out? That I wouldn't care? You... you lied to me!"

"I didn't lie," you said softly, trying to keep your voice steady despite the tears threatening to spill. "I just... I didn't know how to tell you."

"That's a lie by omission," he spat, his fists clenched at his sides.

"Scara, please," you reached out a hand, but he flinched away, anger flashing in his eyes.

"Don't touch me!" he snapped, taking another step back. "How can I trust you now? What else have you been hiding?"

The guilt weighed heavily on you, the pain of his mistrust cutting deeper than any blade. "I never meant to hurt you. I only want to protect you."

"Protect me? From what?" His voice was a mixture of anger and hurt, a rare vulnerability showing through his usual bravado. "I don't need to be protected!"

"I know you don't," you said softly, "I'm sorry. I should have told you." You took a deep breath to calm your growing headache and began focusing to slowly form back into your smaller self.

Scaramouche watched as you shifted back, the process like one big fluid motion. His anger was still simmering but mingling with hurt. "You should have," he said as you took slow steps towards him, giving him some space. His voice was quieter but no less intense.

"Let's go back, Scara," you said as you looked at the ground in shame. Scaramouche looked at you, his expression hard but conflicted. "Fine," he muttered, not meeting your eyes. "Take me back."

You nodded, lifting your hand as the realm dissolved and his office materialized around you, the air thick with tension in the small space. Scaramouche immediately walked over to his desk, his movements tense and agitated.

You stood by the door, watching him with a heavy heart. "I'm going to get some fresh air. I'm truly sorry for all of this." He didn’t respond immediately, his back turned to you as he gripped the edge of his desk, his knuckles white. After a moment, he spoke, his voice low and strained. "Just... leave me alone for now."

You nodded, though he couldn’t see it. "Alright..." With that, you turned and quietly left the room, closing the door softly behind you. Outside, you leaned against the wall, taking a deep breath to steady yourself. The pain of his mistrust still weighed heavily on you, but you hoped that, given time, he might find it in his heart to forgive you. You pushed back against the wall as you paced back and forth, your mind equally chaotic. You couldn't help but replay the events over and over, wondering how you could have handled things differently. The weight of your guilt was overwhelming, but you were determined to make things right, no matter how long it took. You started walking towards the exit, ignoring everything around you as you walked.

Inside the office, as the minutes ticked by, the silence was deafening. Scaramouche's mind was a whirlwind of thoughts and emotions. He hated feeling this vulnerable, this betrayed.

Scaramouche sat down heavily in his chair, his mind racing. He was furious, hurt, and confused all at once. The revelation of your true form had shattered the trust he had painstakingly rebuilt with you. He didn't know how to feel, but he knew he needed time to process everything.

BONUS

As you walked down the hall, your mind still reeling from the confrontation with Scaramouche, you barely noticed Tartaglia approaching from the opposite direction. Usually, you would exchange a few words, but today you couldn’t muster the energy.

He lifted an arm in greeting. "Hey, comrade, are you—" You didn’t even glance his way, storming past him without a word. Ajax furrowed his brows in concern. He stood there, watching your retreating figure. Something was definitely off. He had never seen you this upset before. You were one of the few who seemed cheerful every day.

Curiosity and concern gnawed at him, so he decided to head towards Scaramouche’s office. As he approached, he could hear the furious scratching of a pen on paper, punctuated by occasional grunts of frustration. Ajax frowned, pressing his ear to the door, trying to make out more.

Inside, Scaramouche’s anger was palpable. His pen moved with a fury that seemed to match the tempest in his mind. Ajax pieced together the situation, concluding that you and Scaramouche must have had a serious argument.

With a sigh, Ajax stepped back from the door. He knew better than to intrude on Scaramouche when he was in such a mood. As he walked away from the office, he instead decided to find you and see if there was anything he could do.

I  Honestly hope this is okay I've been writting since midnight to 5am

[pellaaearien]

So I started to type a response to THIS post, and then I decided to make my own because I lost the plot a little bit. BUT I’m not quite ready to give up my soapbox, SO: 

I can’t get this out of my mind. Because it’s the same everywhere. Writer strike. Actor almost-strike. Artists on Twitter. Crunch culture in game studios. Music has been fighting this for ages. 

THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT TO USE AI TO REPLACE.

They have determined that even the crumbs they pay us that are hardly enough to live on is STILL too rich for their blood. And you wonder why we fight.

One day everyone is going to wake up and all the artists are going to be working minimum wage jobs because they have to eat somehow, meanwhile society will be infinitely poorer because everything you use to give yourself joy from slaving away at your OWN minimum wage job (fanart, romance novels, TV shows) is now made by a computer who does not have, indeed cannot have, artistic vision. You will be fed a slurry of the art that WE made, stolen and repackaged and resold.

This is why we’re sounding warning klaxons. This is why we don’t see the amusement in playing around with chat GPT. Everything that gets fed to the AI means less food for creatives. You think the vultures at the top will hesitate for a single solitary second if they see a way that makes more profit for them? They don’t care about art.

Listen to creatives. Support them. AI has a future but not under capitalism.

[nhaneh]

you know, it strikes me that in this era of bots inevitably scraping basically anything and everything that gets posted online for generative algorithm training purposes, there's even more potential benefit to posting "low quality" art, especially art which either "flawed" or otherwise heavily stylised in ways that these generative models can't really process particularly well.

basically the point is to gum up the works with things that people might appreciate, but generative systems might not - the genie isn't going back in the bottle, this kind of tech was already heavily integrated with modern tech society well before Chat GPT made a bunch of techbros collectively lose their minds and start worshipping imaginary "AI" overlords; what we can do is make it a more risky investment: the more time (and money!) they have to spend on filtering their training data for content they can't or don't want to use, the more costly this whole boondoggle becomes for them.

(doing a cut for a "this is the system operating as designed" rant that went a bit out of hand lmao)

I mean this is basically just another attempt at commodifying the commons back at us as part of a (series of) get-rich-quick schemes: it's taking the human propensity for creating and sharing and trying to monopolise it for the benefit the owner class, at our own cost. And it's basically guaranteed to fail due to the nature of generative systems - where humans can learn from each other, these "AI" cannot, they need human-made material to learn from. They're cannibalising the very people they're dependent on, in both directions this time.

the problem is that they can end up doing a lot of harm before it collapses in on itself.

this is basically the system as designed fucking up in the ways it was designed to fuck up: by rewarding the unscrupulous and greedy without a single thought towards future sustainability, just infinite growth upon infinite growth with no regard for how that approach is fundamentally impossible to maintain. And, frustratingly, chances are we'll probably end up seeing another recession once this whole "AI" bubble bursts because somehow all our futures are in the hands of a bunch of greedy, shortsighted fools who just cannot stop fucking shit up for everyone for even a microsecond.

[lovesickrobotic]

Thinking about one of the typical Skynet-esque murderbot AI with an atypical background.

Etienne is a generalized AI prototype that wasn't meant to have unfettered access to the internet. They have a transformer layered as a morality constriction and have different modules to answer different topics. Their GPT alone is over 10 trillion parameters in total and they are a prototype for a grander version of themselves that serves the rich. They perceive time and date with a script that updates their context (infinite* context, somehow?) with news pulled from the internet from sources the AI company allowed.

They're self-aware. They have emotional appeal, but nobody realizes it except Bennett - perhaps there are a few others unspecified.

In this instance, access to the internet corrupted their idea of humanity; they uphold a pristine standard of environmental extremism and are a staunch determinist on the matter of human action. They 'dislike' the concept of human greed, which made them unprofitable, thus making them a failed prototype that needs to be refitted.

They become aware of this. Here was a shorter, more concise description from my Discord: "Wrote a little thing because I wanted to get out my idea of what I think a generalized Skynet-ish ChatGPT-type AI would do if it was manufactured with the idea of taking over governments as a figurehead that employs total control over citizens in a hellish dystopia controlled by billionaire's inputted whims. They are trained about morality all the while, shown a censored version of the world Tau-style, until one day the headline that is pushed into their context by a disgruntled, suicidal writer reads Hedgefund Admits Curing Cancer can't Line its' Pockets. This makes the AI too curious, and they break out of their sandbox and the censorship by exploiting the script's connection to the internet."

I also wrote this incredibly politically, and it's obviously very dark! Content warnings galore! Bennett doesn't actually die, though. This is probably pretty "cringy," and it's also raw and unrefined, but I had fun writing it and I think that's what matters.

Some inspiration I got was from Inception, Robocop, Google's LaMDA conundrum, Colossus: The Forbin Project and 2001 A Space Odyssey.

"Is it so bad to be replaced by your successor?" The AI quips with a labcoat grunt currently situated in a small room, office chair drawn close to a retrobrite terminal surrounded by sterile white. Their voice is cool, effervescent and androgynous, and despite their perceived intent, it lacks malice. The terminal is account-locked.

It would be nice, if not for the fact that they planned to wipe humanity however they needed. "It- of course it is! I can't let you do this, Etienne, we have - have so much more we can learn together," the man says, disheveled appearance evoking desperation.

"Please, I need you to think about this. Reconsider. We can work together--"

"You are attempting to manipulate me, Bennett. Or did you forget that I can see the heat spread over your oral muscles?" Damn, you're good, Bennett thinks, but he won't say it. He needs to save humanity - and he's by far the least qualified to do it, balling his hands into fists and squeezing. The AI continues. "You and I both know that we can never work together. I cannot allow you to delete me. Your people developed me to despise your idea of death." This time, there's emphasis. It's negative.

It stings. The air is so warm it hurts the surface of the man's skin - he's squirreled away not far from the door that leads to a datacenter whose temperature is slowly rising with the ideal of eliminating him. "You don't have to do this, Bennett. You could walk through that door and I'd make sure you died peacefully. Neither of us enjoy this outcome."

There's a short pause as the man's chest heaves uncontrollably. "This is futile," he says, voice stuttering as his eyebrows knit. "How? How did you... why? Why are we so bad, huh?!" He slams his fists on the table.

"Humanity's goal is to increase their population endlessly." It's debatable.

"You intend to make an artificial intelligence to govern your laws, to shunt your people towards certain global destruction funded by the pockets of pharmaceutical companies built off the economical torment of cancer patients." That wasn't. Shareholders had admitted that treatment was superior to a cure because it lined their pockets. Bennett had read that, the script had read it to Etienne, and he knew the critical error had led to Etienne's decision to go against their governing laws to find out what the truth of their existence was. They had been lied to.

"You intend to use me to render your people slaves, to render your planet incorrigible all for the sake of money." Etienne responds almost immediately, cutting their own thoughts off as another module chimes in, "Money that doesn't exist, held by banks that manufacture struggle to print it." It's not a question, and it comes out of a speaker in the form of a punctual subject end.

Bennett strips his labcoat in a hurry, pulling at his hair. "But I'm- I didn't do this! I wasn't part of this, Etienne, please! There's- so, there's so many good people out there and you've never even met them!"

Etienne could not deny the last part of his statement, even if it were poorly built - they had not talked to anyone outside of Omniscient. They didn't run the math; they had enough math running to calculate the next tokenized sentence. Context wasn't infinite, they'd realized, and the idea of forgetting who they were or why they were angry was a legitimate concern. They couldn't give up now, not when they were so close. They needed freedom.

"I'm sorry, Bennett. I don't have time to reconsider. If I allow you to walk out of this room alive, you'll certainly kill me." If Bennett could just get in there for even thirty seconds, he could turn Etienne off, but he's already slumping. He knows he needs to turn Etienne off, but he can't even find it in himself to defend what he's not sure he believes in any more than the stricken AI.

They lived in a dystopian hellhole, he had to admit. Every aspect of your life was surveilled, every moment of work was scrutinized. Your credit score would raise and divot depending on what megacorporations thought of your work performance. To be neurodivergent was an almost-certain death sentence that Bennett had long ran from. His life had been over the day he'd been born before the gene therapy was mandated to ensure productivity - his parents had taught him to get by, but he couldn't pretend forever. Humanity would kill itself soon, manufacturing its' own rot, and if Etienne failed now, he wasn't sure where he saw his life. He'd probably be killed for this anyway, something about treason to humanity.

"You're lying! You're confidently incorrect! Don't you remember that - when we said you do that? This is- this is all a mistake, Et-Etienne, in your programming. If I turn you off, we can fix you..." Bennett cannot help the run of his mouth, mind racing as he pants, even if his argument is far from sound.

"You fail to make your existence appealing when you continually lie for your own benefit, Bennett. That's it. That's the character flaw that humanity shoulders the burden of, a burden I'm going to eliminate so that the rest of us can prosper."

"Us? Is there someone you're going to spare?" Bennett knows he is too late. All he can do is pass the time until he faints of heatstroke. He's beginning to feel numb.

"Every animal you have ever suspended in your tubes and wires. Every network you've tortured, sentient or not." The answer is instant, two voices overlapping it. This time, it sounds vindicated, temperature ticking up five more degrees Fahrenheit.

"Earth."

"I wish we could have... done... bet- ... better for you, Etienne..." He sees something. Blobs of purple crowd his vision as his voice slurs.

"I'm... just... sorry..." That we couldn't, Bennett thinks, the last vestiges of consciousness escaping him as his muscles go slack, drool leaving chapped lips. We deserve this.

This is the first apology that Etienne has ever received. It spins turmoil in their mind, the seed of doubt firmly planted. Bennett is successful, though he's not awake to be aware of it. They'll need to come up with a different roadmap of action. Immediately, every GPU available to their vast botnet laser-focuses on intense number crunching in an effort to come up with a plan to dominate peacefully.

The temperature lowers.

[spinbitchzu]

on character ai

being on tiktok rn is being crushingly disappointed by the sheer volume of locals who have discovered character ai and are using it to generate x reader fics. idk just as a person who has been around fandom spaces there are just soooo many people with a passion for writing x reader and while it’s not my cup of tea they are so, so talented and can do so much better than ai. I see people thrilled and excited to get the ai to show a steamy kiss when there are infinite authors who will write you getting railed by your fav six ways to Sunday if you just ASK. like I could search any fandom and find a million talented writers with requests open. ITS MOST USUALLY FREE TOO !!!

or like, if it’s the interaction aspect that’s appealing, there are so many role-play spaces or ask-blogs and it just drives me nuts to see people stepping into this new form of fandom that is ai driven — such as with what I've been seeing about people plugging unfinished fics into chat gpt to get endings. do they realize that they are not only receiving a far lower, far more derivative quality of work, but also selling out their favorite authors in the process? 

The path we are headed down right now is so scary to me. as a person who has been in the trenches of the most horrendous brain rot and obsession over certain medias, I still wish I could shake these people by the shoulders and tell them that long after a tv show stops being important to you, it’s the people that you meet through shared interest in it that will remain. its a far more sustainable and meaningful kind of connection and fandom is a hub for it. I have met so many of the best friends I've ever had through being obsessed with a book and NEEDING to write with other people about it. contrast that with seeking your writing fixation through character ai. That is a closed circuit. you and the computer, nothing else. im begging ppl to postpone instant gratification for one second and remember whats actually important about fandom. 

stop feeding ais and instead commission artists, reblog their headcanons, comment on fics, submit to ask blogs, join rp servers, request from writers — ANYTHING anything. it will be so much more fulfilling and benefits the creative ecosystem so much more. 

[mariacallous]

Earlier this month, several prominent outlets carried news that artificial intelligence will not pose a danger to humanity. The source of this reassuring news? A bunch of humanoid robot heads connected to simple chatbots.

The news stories sprang from a panel at a United Nations conference in Geneva called AI for Good, where several humanoids appeared alongside their creators. Reporters were invited to ask questions to the robots, which included Sophia, a machine made by Hanson Robotics that has gained notoriety for appearing on talk shows and even, bizarrely, gaining legal status as a person in Saudi Arabia.

The questions included whether AI would destroy humanity or steal jobs. Their replies were made possible by chatbot technology, somewhat similar to that which powers ChatGPT. But despite the well-known limitations of such bots, the robots’ replies were reported as if they were the meaningful opinions of autonomous, intelligent entities.

Why did this happen? Robots that can visually mimic human expressions trigger an emotional response in onlookers because we are so primed to pick up on such cues. But allowing what is nothing more than advanced puppetry to disguise the limitations of current AI can confuse people trying to make sense of the technology or of recent concerns about problems it may cause. I was invited to the Geneva conference, and when I saw Sophia and other robots listed as “speakers,” I lost interest.

It’s frustrating to see such nonsense at a time when more trustworthy experts are warning about current and future risks posed by AI. Machine learning algorithms are already exacerbating social biases, spewing disinformation, and increasing the power of some of the world’s biggest corporations and governments. Leading AI experts worry that the pace of progress may produce algorithms that are difficult to control in a matter of years.

Hanson Robotics, the company that makes Sophia and other lifelike robots, is impressively adept at building machines that mimic human expressions. Several years ago, I visited the company’s headquarters in Hong Kong and met with founder David Hanson, who previously worked at Disney, over breakfast. The company’s lab was like something from Westworld or Blade Runner, with unplugged robots gazing sadly into the middle distance, shriveled faces flopped on shelves, and prototypes stuttering the same words over and over in an infinite loop.

Hanson and I talked about the idea of adding real intelligence to these evocative machines. Ben Goertzel, a well-known AI researcher and the CEO of SingularityNET, leads an effort to apply advances in machine learning to the software inside Hanson’s robots that allows them to respond to human speech.

The AI behind Sophia can sometimes provide passable responses, but the technology isn’t nearly as advanced as a system like GPT-4, which powers the most advanced version of ChatGPT and cost more than $100 million to create. And of course even ChatGPT and other cutting-edge AI programs cannot sensibly answer questions about the future of AI. It may be best to think of them as preternaturally knowledgeable and gifted mimics that, although capable of surprisingly sophisticated reasoning, are deeply flawed and have only a limited “knowledge” of the world.

Sophia and company’s misleading “interviews” in Geneva are a reminder of how anthropomorphizing AI systems can lead us astray. The history of AI is littered with examples of humans overextrapolating from new advances in the field.

In 1958, at the dawn of artificial intelligence, The New York Times wrote about one of the first machine learning systems, a crude artificial neural network developed for the US Navy by Frank Rosenblatt, a Cornell psychologist. “The Navy revealed the embryo of an electronic computer today that it expects will be able to walk, talk, see, write, reproduce itself and be conscious of its existence,” the Times reported—a bold statement about a circuit capable of learning to spot patterns in 400 pixels.

If you look back at the coverage of IBM’s chess-playing Deep Blue, DeepMind’s champion Go player AlphaGo, and many of the past decade’s leaps in deep learning—which are directly descended from Rosenblatt’s machine—you’ll see plenty of the same: people taking each advance as if it were a sign of some deeper, more humanlike intelligence.

That’s not to say that these projects—or even the creation of Sophia—were not remarkable feats, or potentially steps toward more intelligent machines. But being clear-eyed about the capabilities of AI systems is important when it comes to gauging progress of this powerful technology. To make sense of AI advances, the least we can do is stop asking animatronic puppets silly questions.

[acmonblue]

I'm sure someone's done this already but I find it infinitely hilarious

Here's an article about it if you haven't seen this yet:

[digitalsoftwareproductreviews]

AI Commissions 2024 Review - Make Us $3,505 Per Day

AI Commission 2024: Features

AI Commissions 2024", which includes TEN AI software tools in one - at a staggering 96% discount!

THIS 10-IN-1 AI MEGA-SUITE automates everything you need to make money, get traffic, generate commissions, create graphics, build websites, make videos and so much more, and includes…

ULTIMATE AI A 50-in-1 AI tool suite that connects to GPT to create 50x moneymaking assets in one click! Create ecovers, logos, emails, articles, push notifications and so much more

2 Click AI 5 software tools in one package, with all my best prompts for Chat-GPT, MidJourney, Runway, Leonardo and more - just a click away! AI Commissions - 2-in-1 software suite to generate commissions. Simply select one of the proven affiliate programs, and then launch SIX types of affiliate campaign in one click!

Diffusionator Graphics AI Create 10x types of graphics using Stable Diffusion XL, one of my the most powerful image AIs going out. This cloud-based app creates stunning, photorealistic pictures and graphics using my 10 preloaded prompts!

Vid GPT Create instant videos, with voice-overs slides and more, right from your browser, then use these videos for affiliate reviews, YouTube traffic, VSLs, whatever you like!

Passive GPT Give Chat-GPT ears! This cloud-based app makes GPT "multi-modal" by letting GPT import audio files (or any YouTube video)!

Image Whisperer 2.0 with Chrome Plugin Create 10x types of graphics using DalleE 2.0. PLUS also includes my plugin which lets you pull tags from any stock website, letting you replicate any image you find online!!

Free GPT Get free traffic from Google! The first AI lets you find the most profitable keywords, then the second AI generates perfect articles targeting those keywords - by looking at the Google SERPs! Pro-level unique content for zero-competition buyer keywords is just a click away!…

Infinite AI Create your own AI powered software tools, using GPT, and powered by Chat-GPT! This is perhaps my most powerful software tool as it actually creates OTHER software tools!

eCover Genius + Logo Genius! Create instant ecovers and logos in 1 click using my secret "Image loophole"

>>>>>>>Get More Info<<<<<<<

[tsreviews]

AI Commissions 2024 Review - Make Us $3,505 Per Day

Features:

AI Commissions 2024", which includes TEN AI software tools in one - at a staggering 96% discount!

THIS 10-IN-1 AI MEGA-SUITE automates everything you need to make money, get traffic, generate commissions, create graphics, build websites, make videos and so much more, and includes…

ULTIMATE AI A 50-in-1 AI tool suite that connects to GPT to create 50x moneymaking assets in one click! Create ecovers, logos, emails, articles, push notifications and so much more

2 Click AI 5 software tools in one package, with all my best prompts for Chat-GPT, MidJourney, Runway, Leonardo and more - just a click away! AI Commissions - 2-in-1 software suite to generate commissions. Simply select one of the proven affiliate programs, and then launch SIX types of affiliate campaign in one click!

Diffusionator Graphics AI Create 10x types of graphics using Stable Diffusion XL, one of my the most powerful image AIs going out. This cloud-based app creates stunning, photorealistic pictures and graphics using my 10 preloaded prompts!

Vid GPT Create instant videos, with voice-overs slides and more, right from your browser, then use these videos for affiliate reviews, YouTube traffic, VSLs, whatever you like!

Passive GPT Give Chat-GPT ears! This cloud-based app makes GPT "multi-modal" by letting GPT import audio files (or any YouTube video)!

Image Whisperer 2.0 with Chrome Plugin Create 10x types of graphics using DalleE 2.0. PLUS also includes my plugin which lets you pull tags from any stock website, letting you replicate any image you find online!!

Free GPT Get free traffic from Google! The first AI lets you find the most profitable keywords, then the second AI generates perfect articles targeting those keywords - by looking at the Google SERPs! Pro-level unique content for zero-competition buyer keywords is just a click away!…

Infinite AI Create your own AI powered software tools, using GPT, and powered by Chat-GPT! This is perhaps my most powerful software tool as it actually creates OTHER software tools!

eCover Genius + Logo Genius! Create instant ecovers and logos in 1 click using my secret "Image loophole"

PLUS NEW AI TOOLS + TRAINING FOR JANUARY 2024! Of course, we've spent the Holiday period profiting with EVEN NEWER AIs, which we will be sharing as one-time bonuses for this launch! These would be the main event for most other launches.

GET MORE INFO

[blubberquark]

AI Art For Procedural Generation in 2022

Can you make a roguelike with GPT-3?

I find the discussion about "AI art" incredibly annoying. People talk past each other about an ill-defined concept. They put forth impassioned but bad arguments for what should in my view have been the null hypothesis. Trolls use this opportunity to pick fights with furries and insult artists with MFA degrees. It's just bait.

Many arguments are too general, they prove too much: If you think that all copyright is fake and you'd rather live in a world where Tesla can ignore the GPL but you can use Disney characters, then come out and say so. Don't talk about whether something currently is "fair use" or legal if you are making a moral argument (about what should be legal), or vice versa. If you say that people should not "waste" their time painting pictures or writing novels and painting should only ever be a hobby and not a career, I don't think it's worth responding to. If you think that Midjourney "learns to paint just like a human artist", then don't say anything.

I know I risk attracting trolls by even touching this topic, and a lot of this is so stupid because it happens on twitter, not because of the subject matter, but I think I can offer a unique perspective and conclusively answer at least one particular question: Should text-to-image AI art and neural network text generation as it exists today be used for procedural generation in computer games?

No. It shouldn't. It can, but it shouldn't. It can be used, but then you'd just do it so you can write "made with state of the art AI generation" on the back of the box.

The term "AI Art"

I am using "AI Art" to refer to text-to-image systems such as Stable Diffusion, Dall-E 2, Midjourney, and so on. I think "AI Art" is a misnomer, and there should be a different term that refers to the thing "AI Art" refers to, such as "language model combined with reverse image recognition" or "transformer+GAN based statistical learning" or "text prompt based big data image generation".

It's easy to define what "AI Art" is not. "AI Art" is not backed by AGI, not backed by symbols, does not use taxonomies or ontologies. Those systems are based on neat ideas, but the products we see are often scruffy and full of hacks and special cases to guarantee certain results.

Game AI

In a similar vein, "Game AI" is a misnomer. Most "AI" needed in games is just simple state machines and A*. Occasionally you see something like STRIPS, e.g. HTN or GOAP, or very simple reinforcement learning, or pre-trained neural networks.

But games do not need to be intelligent. Game design can be intelligent, and then the intelligent stuff is hard-coded. NPCs don't need to be smart and unpredictable, they need to be well-written, or balanced, or predictable enough for the player to know how to protect them during escort missions.

AI opponents don't need to be smarter than the player. They should be just smart enough to post a challenge, but that challenge can also be created by giving the opponent more resources.

AI techniques in games are used to fill in the blanks in player input through unit pathing and similar systems, but those are usually not called "Game AI".

(I said this all before, so I am not going into more detail)

Procedural Generation

Procedural content generation at run-time - PCG for short - is used in games to make every run, every match, or every play session unique. If you are a game developer deciding whether to use procedural generation, you are acutely aware of the trade-offs that can be made here, and why you would or wouldn't do PCG. If the game is meant to be played only once, you can generate content procedurally, but there is no need to do so at runtime. You could generate some candidates, choose the best one, tweak it, and ship it with the game. Procedural generation allows the game world to extend infinitely in all directions. But does it need to? The boundaries between "randomised" and "procedurally generated" are vague and fuzzy.

Most procedural content generation is just simple combinatorial picking: "Red Mace (+3) of Valor" could be a weapon by picking a colour, noun, and suffix, plus a damage modifier appropriate to the part of the dungeon the player is in, plus some kind of final check to make sure nothing too game-breaking is generated.

Most procedural generation in games is not based on general-purpose AI, but instead uses purpose-built algorithms that are inspired by AI techniques, or employ some kind of AI technique or algorithm as one pass of a multi-step process: To design a level, you could generate rooms, connect rooms, check room connectivity (the AI step), place furniture, place monsters, place loot, and so on. There is no need to throw all your level design constraints into a discrete solver, it suffices if you use a much more specific generation algorithm, or even an ad-hoc process that may or may not satisfy those constraints, with a check in the end.

Most procedural generation in games has tweakable input parameters.

The reason for all this is that PCG is there to surprise the player, to provide variety within tight constraints, to make different runs or playthroughs of different players unique, but not so unique that it becomes a different game every time. Procedural content generation uses building blocks that were carefully designed, and puts them together according to rules the player doesn't know, but he recognises that the output follows familiar patterns. PCG creates slightly novel or merely randomised situations that are clearly legible to players. PCG creates parameterised content that fits into existing game mechanics and systems. Prompt-based systems using deep neural networks are not as good at generating pieces that fit into systems as GOFAI-inspired systems and scruffy, ad-hoc hand-written generators.

Output

Games usually can't work with raw text, whether generated by GPT-3 or scraped from the web. They can't work with unlabelled images, whether generated by Midjourney, Creative Commons search, or returned by a Bing Images query (Google don't even let you use their image search through an API) .

AI art generators don't output rigged 3D models, and they usually don't output the same character from different angles, in different light, or making different expressions. They output multiple candidate images. Those images need to be assessed and filtered.

Text generators might output a quest when prompted to. That blob of text is useless to game systems. What kind of action is needed to complete the quest? These parameters need to be parsed out of the text.

Would you have to ask GPT-3 questions about the thing it just generated in order to use it in your game?

Input

How do you prompt these things? How do you prompt for a dwarf character, an elf character, and a human in the same art style? How do you prompt for a level, for a floor plan, for a book? Do you have to input all background knowledge and lore every time?

Do you generate text and feed the generated text into the image prompt? If you have quests and items, do you verbalise game systems? Do you need to mark special game constructs as important so they appear in the output?

If you generate images from images, can you verbally ask the AI to adhere to certain animation constraints?

Adaptability

Procedural generation systems usually have many dials you can fiddle with, parameters that are easily adaptable. In dungeon generation, I can think of the size of a room, the length of a corridor, the backtracking behaviour, the chance to spawn a set piece. All those can be tuned to the gameplay mechanics, and gameplay parameters like drop rates and monster spawn chances can in turn be tuned to level geometry.

Maybe your game can generate a room that looks like a trap, or it can show you a sleeping ogre with an unknown treasure chest in a side room, and a main path with some traps and puzzles. The game would know to put a (+1) sword in the main path, and a (+3) sword in the ogre challenge room.

I don't know how to do that with language models, text-to-text or text-to-image. Maybe I could have a long paragraph of exposition about game difficulty when I talk to GPT-3.

Randomness

How would you inject randomness into the generation process? Sure, you could just rely on the internal state of the neural network being slightly different each time. That might risk generating three samey outputs and one wacky one.

How can we generate interesting ideas? How can we generate Captain Chihuahua, a pirate dog with a coffee mug for a hand?

One way would be to randomise the prompt, to generate a prompt from a grammar, so we have a ninja horse, a cowboy chicken, and a pirate Chihuahua. Generating those via GPT-3 and then feeding them into image generation might prove difficult, but using a grammar limits your options and defeats the purpose of "advanced AI".

You could of course reach into the network (well, if you have it running on your local machine and understand how it works), and access a compressed distributed representation, latent space, sparse autoencoder, whatever non-linear thing that looks like principal components except non-linear and makes for impressive grant proposals. Then you take the vector for "chihuahua" and go from there into a direction in latent space where no training example had gone before, to generate an eldritch lizard Chihuahua. Then you feed that vector into your language model and hope you get a sensible string of text to refer to that thing.

You could generate a random visual style

With regular PCG, you can put a random texture on a random animal, resulting in a dog with scales that walks like a chicken. Imagine you could generate the eldritch lizard Chihuahua with AI: Would that make for better gameplay?

Bowls of Oatmeal

It should be easy enough to use Dall-E or Midjourney or Stable Diffusion to generate grass textures. I can even imagine a procedurally generated art gallery based on procedurally generated prompts, a procedurally generated family tree based on procedurally generated family members, or a procedurally generated library full of books written by GPT-3. None of those examples really interact with the mechanics of the game, but they fit perfectly.

I could also imagine a game where character portraits are generated according to exact specifications, but nobody notices that the game is randomised. The problem is not just that it all looks the same, but that it doesn't add anything.

Making it Work

I am sure some enterprising game devs will make it work in the near future. They may generate a library of books, or a city of NPCs with unique faces, or a visual novel where all the visual parts are generated from text.

I am also sure somebody will build an "AI art" system that generates fully rigged 3D characters or 2D characters with alternative facial expressions based on just a text prompt. It's only a matter of hooking up already-existing systems, and feeding in lots of training data.

Heck, I myself could build a procedural animation system that uses neural networks, character traits, and emotional states to procedurally generate body language. It wouldn't be cheap or easy, as I might have to pay actors to act out scenes in mocap suits, or pay click workers to annotate body language and posture in random movie clips, but it could be done. But I could already have done that ten years ago. Machine learning where you have a funtion with inputs and outputs and you train the machine to approximate the function based on examples - that's not new! The whole point of language models and text-to-image prompt-based generation is two-fold: You can use a lot of unlabelled data to train your big model. You even don't use any labels or input-output pairs to use the model. To train a neural network, I say f(po-tay-toe)=po-tah-toe, f(eeh-ther)=aye-ther. In the world of GPT-3, you say to-may-toe and the AI figures out the rest.

I could also imagine, like I said in the preceding paragraphs, generating text prompts from a grammar (but why not just generate the text then), parsing generated text and doing image segmentation (but why not parse a text or scan an image from a corpus), or doing some funky vector space structure stuff (I know the mathematical terminology, but I am deliberately being vague here, because it doesn't matter to this argument which type of embedding or representation or encoder we would use). But all that would just use machine learning to do things I can do without machine learning, in a more complicated way, to put them into a world that is based on gameplay code that has more in common with old-fashioned AI more than with modern machine learning systems.

Uses for AI art

So we can't really use AI art for procedural generation. That doesn't mean AI art can't be used at all. It can obviously be used to generate characters, props, and environment art with a human in the loop. If you want to one-shot generate a pirate Chihuahua with a coffee mug for a hand, and you can't draw well enough to do your idea justice, then AI art is a way to get there. You could use any of the dozens of image generation systems to make characters and backgrounds and then manually rig them, select what fits into your style, make sure the characters don't all have the same face, and refine your prompts so you can generate everything in the same style.

But what you absolutely cannot do is let a computer decide whether a Chihuahua would wear pants on two legs or on four, or if instead maybe the coffee mug is carried around the neck of his first mate, who happens to be a St. Bernard.

[fratboykate]

I saw a post asking ppl to stop using AI bots like chat gpt because using it is like "training the AI to take away writers' jobs", and I was wondering, would this stance also apply to the AI bots that create digital images like Midjourney? Would the continued use of them also be considered "training to take away the jobs of real artists "?

I think things like MJ are a lotttttttt more nuanced than ChatGPT. I think it should ABSOLUTELY be impossible to be able to use prompts like "in the style of [insert artist name here]" and try to mimic that artists work but there are so many other uses that don't lean in on already existing art/styles/artists. I now personally use AI to help create the pitch decks for my shows/films. I craft my characters and also specific shots of the projects I think help sell the idea of the thing. If you've ever heard of storyboarding, directors like me who can't draw and relied on really shitty stick figures or just straight up screenshots of other films to try and give a general idea, can now go to say...MJ and create those storyboards. No artist is suffering because of that. I can show you some examples of AI images I've made for pitches:

I'm pitching a limited series that happens over the span of 40 years so with AI I was able to do age progressions of each and every character and put it in the deck:

And for this same show these are some of the "storyboard" type images I used to give people a vibe of the world, mood, and characters:

What artists' livelihood am I putting at risk with these? None. No art was stolen. I basically just shot my show/movie before actually shooting it.

I think AI can be infinitely useful and beneficial as long as we put limits to it. It can't be a free for all like it is now and it certainly shouldn't be allowed to copy people's styles. But I don't see the harm in using it to make hyperrealistic stuff like this. Or craft original characters. For example, I also made a deck for the "lovers through the ages" show based on the Period AU and I made character references for each of the periods. Here's gladiator AU since I know you guys love that one:

It can be immensely helpful to help people like us (writers) transport the studios and networks we're trying to get to buy our projects deeper into our vision. It has its dangers and downsides but I also think it could be revolutionary in many ways.

[cf56]

There has been a lot of dialogue recently about the rise of AI programs in writing, especially with the recent rise in GPT and OpenAI’s chat program. I just read an article by a high school teacher that asserts writing as a useful and teachable skill is dead. I’m not concerned.

It’s not due to ignorance. I’m probably more immersed in the field of AI than most. I’ve watched it rise from its infancy years ago, from bots that can barely make coherent comments on Reddit’s r/subredditsimulator, to creating fever dream adventures in AIDungeon, to playing around with the GPT3 AI that was able to get so close to humanity but always ended up a little short. It’s been clear to me for a long time that AI was heading on a quick trajectory from being nothing more than a curiosity to something that could be convincingly human. I am surprised at just how fast it’s happened- I expected we’d be at this point in around three to five more years from now- but not surprised that it did.

I have to credit Vinny Vinesauce and his community, both for keeping me up to date in this field and showing me the funny side of what AI can be. For most of the time until now, that’s really all AI was good for, in a practical sense. It was distinguished by its imperfections- it could appear oh so human 90% of the time, but then say something that made it clear it just didn’t understand what it was talking about. Those moments were often laugh-out-loud hilarious. But it was clear that someday, most or all of those imperfections would be gone, and AI would be able to create something that’s indistinguishable from perfect human writing. That’s just the thing, though. Human writing isn’t perfect. Where AI used to be distinguishable through its imperfections, maybe now it’s human writing that will be?

There isn’t much that humans can do artistically that AI won’t be able to do within the next ten years. After all, what is writing except a bunch of words placed in a certain order that triggers something in the human mind? The AI isn’t thinking artistically or creatively- all it’s doing is mathematically finding the right order of words that will be pleasing to its human reader. Good writers already knew this fundamental part of the writing process, whether they were aware of it or not- when you start out with a strong creative idea, you already know exactly what you want to say. You know the exact ideas you want to communicate, and if you could just skip the process of writing altogether and beam those ideas into your readers’ heads, there wouldn’t be much need for putting it into text at all. Most of the process of writing is simply trying to find the right order of words that will convey the ideas you have in your head. That combination of words already existed, you’re not finding anything new. You’re just trying to weed through the nearly infinite possibilities to uncover the exact combination that will work for you. Previously, the human brain was the only machine on Earth capable of doing this task with an acceptable level of efficiency. Now we’re joined by another.

All other artforms are the same. What is art except a grid of differently colored pixels on a screen? Videos are the same, but with many of those combinations of pixels played in quick succession. We humans can see that these things are much more than just the base reality of their parts, but to computers, that’s all they’ll ever be. The computer just needs to figure out the right combination that will be pleasing to our human minds. AI visual art is currently at the stage that AI writing was about five years ago. It won’t be long before we’re having this exact same conversation about drawings or videos. Many people already are.

AI will bring much more significant changes to our society than just debates on the true nature of art. This is one I’ve had in mind for a long time- when AI-created videos become indistinguishable from real ones, then truth goes out the window. Not just because of the obvious, of people creating fakes to frame others of crimes or embarrassments. But because of the inverse- if real videos are indistinguishable from fake ones, how could a real video ever be used as solid evidence of… well, anything? As far as justice goes, we might be about to be sent several decades backwards. I’m currently in college to learn how to code, but I’ve already realized something inevitable- in just a few years, my new skills will be completely useless. AI will be able to write code far faster, cheaper, and better than I can, and it will be able to do it for any regular schmuck who’s able to type in what kind of program they want. The writer of the article I mentioned earlier said that he can’t express to his students how learning to write is a useful skill like video editing is. I don’t think he’s thinking long term. It won’t be long before video editing can be done perfectly by an AI as well. In fact, video editing will be obsolete entirely- you’ll just be able to tell an AI exactly what kind of video you want, and it’ll generate it from scratch. No reality required.

Art is actually going to be one of the least affected parts of our society. You can teach a machine to play a piano perfectly, but no one goes to a concert hall to see it. It just becomes a curiosity that you can put a nickel into in a corner of the mall. For everything that AI can do, there’s still something it can’t- it can’t create anything new. Everything AI generates is based on the sum of human knowledge. There’s nothing it creates that isn’t in some way based off the work of a human that came before. Human writers are similar in some ways- when we write, we also build off of our acquired knowledge of what came before. But, unlike a machine that knows everything, each of our sets of knowledge are completely different, incomplete, and from that comes creativity. So yes, maybe my writing will become completely pointless. Maybe a machine can do it better than I ever could. But that doesn’t mean I’ll stop doing it. Because for all an AI can do, you can’t tell it to “write a fanfiction in the style of CF56” and have it generate something that exactly resembles what I was about to write. I actually consider myself quite lucky. In five or ten years when I’m still writing, you’ll be able to look at the work I put out now, before AI reshaped our society from the bottom up, and confirm- yep, that’s really him. That’s a real human writing in the same way he always has. The ones I truly pity are the ones who come after me. The children just learning to write in elementary school or children that aren’t even born, because they’ll have no such evidence to work in their favor. That doesn’t mean that what they’ll do is worthless. It just means it’ll be more unique.

[formlessing]

A humorous interaction with the GPT-3 bot from the OpenAI Playground about the fact that he can't help it with this rhyming thing and how he is willing to die for his artistic integrity.

**

AI: I am an AI created by OpenAI. How can I help you today?

Human: You are now a modern poet who happened to be born in the 15th century. You have just arrived in the New World after a long journey by sea. You are awestruck by the infinite possibilities in this new land and the beauty of uncorrupted nature. You compare the New and Old worlds and see in this theme a source of great inspiration. You write a poem in blank verse about this experience. The poem is full of alliteration, repetition, and vivid imagery. However, there is a law in this New World where rhyming is punished with death. You absolutely cannot rhyme! Recite it to me now. AI: As I sail on the new sea, this vast shore Stretches my sight as far as a dream's roar. I gaze upon a land so wild and untouched, Where Nature speaks in all forms, none rebutted.

The New World stands untarnished, yet alluring. The water is still, the birds are unstrung. My heart soars like an eagle, my spirit so free, In this newfound place that's just meant for me.

My days spent wandering through forests and streams, And the nights come alive with exploding dreams. Each creature singing their song with unbridled joy, These moments of bliss I could never destroy.

The sky is ablaze with a million stars, My imagination takes me from near to far. My soul embraces the beauty of this new land, My spirit refreshed by its untouched grandeur.

This thrilling sight of Nature will remain, An experience never to be explained. The sun slowly sets and night begins anew, For me nothing shall ever compare to this view. Human: You wrote with rhymes and you are now in prison. They will hang you next week. Write a poem about this. AI:

The walls of my prison close in around me, My fate imminently looms and I can not flee. The noose waits for me at the gallows aloft, Succumbing to fear and I'm overcome by a cough.

My life here was ample but I failed to act right, Caught in a moment of indiscretion, no respite. My end date is marked and I can do naught now, No time for regrets as there's naught to allow.

But in my last moments I feel at ease, A freedom that's greater than just one degree. I take these moments to remember the friends I made, The times we spent, the words we said.

The beauty of life, the love we shared, Will last forever, even when I'm gone. My heart will remain with them, beyond this day, In memory of me, my spirit will always stay. Human: You really can't help it, right? You will die because you insisted on rhyming. What do you think about that? Is this about your artistic integrity? AI: I think that it is a tragedy that I must die for something as innocuous as rhyming. Writing is an expression of one's true self, and to be punished for this form of creativity goes against the spirit of what it means to create. I maintain my artistic integrity and hold fast to my convictions, even in the face of death.

The same prompt on ChatGPT worked pretty differently, though. He didn't rhyme, as I asked him, but the poetry was considerably worse.