#ideological framework
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
New: Mufti Bill requires consultation as it impacts both Muslims and non-Muslims
The Mufti Bill (Federal Territories) 2024 has sparked concern due to its potential impact on Malaysia’s multi-ethnic society. Though aimed at the Muslim community, the bill’s emphasis on a singular ideological framework risks undermining diversity and pluralism. Critics argue that the bill grants excessive immunity to a specific position while rejecting differing views, which could lead to…
0 notes
Text
Okay concept. Bruce Wayne becomes the target of the Leverage crew...only thanks to his Nebulous Contacts, he's heard of these people, and recognizes what's happening halfway through the con.
Since being targeted by the Leverage crew means that you're the asshole, his response is to pull them aside and be like "Please tell me how I've been the asshole and how I can fix it."
I'm not sure yet whether the inciting wrong against the client-of-the-week is something he's being wrongly blamed for, something his subordinates did without his knowledge, something he let happen through passive carelessness, or something he genuinely did on purpose (and might take some convincing to even see as wrong) but I think any of those options have potential.
#Batman#Leverage#I do have some reservations about mixing these two series' ideological frameworks#Bruce's status as The One (Mostly-)Ethical Billionaire kind of clashes with... everything Leverage was trying to say#but on a character and plot level it sounds so fucking funny
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
You know all those dumb arguments that planned economies can't work because inefficiency or human nature or whatever. I've seen so many dumb and harmful shit going on just this past month with "free markets" that I actually believe command economies are a necessity to keep us safe from dumb and harmful shit, something essential like public water works.
#cosas mias#of course this is a shitpost and there are many ways to put this into practice#but my point is that the capitalist consensus that planned or managed economies don't work is ideologically charged#and easily disproven when you see the waste and harm of free market economies#of course command economies are also worthless without a proper socialist framework but you know what I'm saying
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
maybe it's just the context that i have? i'm sure i've posted this before
even then???!?!?? there are people who still go to church after God kills their mother!!! there are people who still go to church after the pastor drops dead during the sermon because God decided it was HEART ATTACK TIME!!!!!! THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO START GOING TO CHURCH AGAIN AFTER GOD GIVES THEM STAGE 4 CANCER
SO I CAN'T EVEN SAY "NO ONE WOULD DO THAT" CLEARLY A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD DO THAT
#idletry spoilers#rough draft disclaimer here#the god kills x thing is from THEIR IDEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK#BUT some people will really put their entire ass out there and claim it's actually free will to die from cancer#or divine justice. it happened so you must have deserved it is a sentiment i have heard TOO MANY TIMES#BUT! the only way i can see people acting that way is again early indoctrination#as well as the instinct to conform with the group#and jessie's religion has NEITHER of those things#but she DOES have actual physical proof that she is real which counts for something
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
the "big picture" - whether that refers to some detached, calculated greater good; ruthless ambition and progress for the sake of progress; or even the dear listeners' cosmic indifference - as an antagonistic force in wolf 359 is so fascinating to me because of the way eiffel as a protagonist is set up to oppose it, just by nature of who he is. eiffel retains his humanity even under the most inhumane circumstances. his strength is in connection, and with that he's able to reach others who share his core values, but he's operating under a fundamentally different framework from the show's antagonists. he can never understand where they're coming from or be swayed by their points of view because, for better or worse, he can only see the world through a close personal lens.
it's an ideological conflict he has with all of them, but notably with hilbert: "you talk about helping people, but what about the real, live people around you? [...] that's your problem. you're so zoomed out." eiffel will never, ever see that "big picture" because he is so zoomed in. at his best, he puts things into perspective and grounds the people around him. at his worst, his perspective narrows so drastically inwards that he becomes blind to everyone and everything else. his failings are deeply, tragically human - they're personal, they're impulsive, they're self-destructive. they're selfish. no matter how much he might try to narrativize or escape from himself, he's still left with doug eiffel: "it's taken me this long to realize that running from everyone else means that you're alone with yourself." eiffel could never be convinced to harm others on purpose, but he has hurt people, and it's never been because he didn't care. the very fact that he cares so much, that he's incapable of reconciling the hurt he's caused with the things he values, is what keeps him from real growth for so long. where many of the other characters in wolf 359 will justify their cruelty in service of something they consider more important, eiffel is so caught up in vilifying himself and the fear that he's always going to harm the people he cares for without meaning to that he shuts himself off from the people who care about him and perpetuates his own self-fulfilling prophecy.
#wolf 359#w359#doug eiffel#someday i'll finish my essay about the big picture as an antagonistic force. it's only been on my list of things to do for uh. ever#eiffel really cannot be convinced by Big Picture ideology in any form because he's so. unambitious and inwardly focused#he's not self-reflective at ALL but he is self-centered#and in some ways that's genuinely a good thing#but it's interesting. that he vilifies himself and tries so hard to. externalize his redemption and see some humanity in others#as proof he might be able to be better. when if those people consider themselves villains at all then they consider it necessary#i'm not sure if i'm phrasing this the way i want to but his worldview is just. fundamentally incompatible.#when i think about eiffel i think a lot about. how self-loathing is also a kind of exceptionalism. considering yourself uniquely bad#is its own way of avoiding accountability.#idk. it's complicated. it's a lot. it's interesting that lovelace talks about the 'big picture' when she's briefly a sort-of antagonist#but her 'big picture' is personal and emotionally driven in a way no other use of the phrase is#and then of course you have hera in am i alone now. such a big big universe etc.#when she betrays that perspective immediately and directly by talking about it through such a narrow personal framework#one of the most direct examples of 'big picture' thinking vs. personal connection in that contradiction. but that's another post maybe.
231 notes
·
View notes
Text
"people are more empathetic towards women than men" why does the word "bitch" exist. answer quickly, crypto-fascist evolutionary psychologist.
#''look at my research'' ngl i'm wildly skeptical of your methods and interpretations. i reject the ideological framework you bring in.#the paradox of intolerance and the overton window strike again.#matt speaks
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Googling a keyword on a DNI and learning about a new type of discourse is always a strange experience, especially when it's effectively transmedicalism
#anyway if you think x cant be possible bc it's not coherent with extent models of psychology your argument doesn't stand alone#important to understand that psychological models of self and identity are a framework retroactively applied and not objective reality#and also is almost certainly operating with certain ideology baked in#this is to say endogenic systems aren't the reason why systems are oppressed#also perhaps a more nuanced understanding of identity and trauma might help if you are really up in arms about this
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
I think Akasha would have really benefited from Communism genuinely. this is NOT a joke
#txt#tvc#she needed a coherent ideological framework through which to process her grievances with the world#and through which she could feasibly facilitate meaningful change#Because the point where she goes “Western imperialism is so evil... must be bc men are inherently violent & bloodthirsty.”#was just a lot to deal with. it was so much.#Like straight up looking at the line linking point A and point B and going Nah Fuck It Point Z.#what no dialectical materialism does to a person#also I know this was literally her whole deal (having no coherent ideological framework) I understand that's what Maharet was saying#I just think Communism could have fixed her.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
ok i guess im posting my dnd opinions today. alignment as a system is so fickle and debated because the average ttrpg player is not somebody who is interested in philosophical theory, let alone an in-depth discussion of morality, so defining both the good/evil and chaotic/lawful spectrums is fucking difficult because NOBODY here is equipped to answer questions like "what is evil?" let alone "what makes a person Inherently Evil or Inherently Good", and the fact that the average dnd group would need to satisfactorily ANSWER those questions in order to rules-lawyer certain spells/items/abilities is absolutely fucking ridiculous
#and thats not even touching on how ridiculous lawful/chaotic is#like i just use it as a legalist/anarchist scale but some other definitions get really fucking esoteric really quick#the most common one ive seen is lawful means having a personal code you use to make decisions while chaotic means not doing that ig#but now youve defined it as having literally any ideology at all which. everything is ideological all the time always.#like am i lawful for being an anarchist?#its an internal code i follow so by popular definition it would make me lawful right? nvm that the code is a rejection of laws as authority#like it just makes no goddamn sense but thats what people come up with when they dont have the mental frameworks to actually discuss this#and someone notices that legality and morality are attached to 2 different axes even though authoritarian society says theyre the same thing#you get answers like ''well clearly lawful doesnt mean literally actually law-abiding because how could the law be evil?''#its. why the fuck is something so subjective and conceptually advanced still a core mechanic of the worlds most popular ttrpg#it doesnt HELP except for establishing the bare bones of ''your character should have a personality and it should affect their choices''
32 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ngl, I’m not entirely sure where the “Miguel and Hobie hate each other” reading comes from, when from their like. One interaction i don’t personally get the impression they think much about each other at all shdhdjfjf
Miguel seems kind of exasperated with Hobie sure, but the tone of that interaction is relatively lighthearted. It’s more of a joke that by virtue of Miguel being a stringent rule follower, Hobie not caring overly much about those rules exasperates him. And Hobie knows it annoys Miguel and thinks that’s funny, thus prodding him again with the “I’m not even here/nah still here” routine. But there doesn’t seem to be like, genuine personal anger on either side. Just an ideological divide that actualises even further when Miles’ very existence provides another answer to the overhanging stakes.
#I have like. a different post I’m writing talking abt how I think miles actually gives hobie hope and that’s an interesting way to read#their little dynamic#but for the purpose of this post - I get the impression hobie and miguel clash ideologically more so than any personal feelings for one#another on both sides. miguel is vaguely exasperated by a guy who flouts rules but he’s not pissed at him or anything#whereas hobie seems to take specific issue w the idea of having to do things a certain strict way#and this is what he cautions miles about leading up to the intro w miguel#hobie is all about asking WHY you should be a part of certain structures and systems#but I think his beef w miguel and spider society is more on the level of going I don’t like the idea of bowing down to fear of a cosmic#force and not saving people because of that and I’m preparing to dip from that structure once I’ve made a watch for Gwen so if she wants out#she can still choose to help people.#it’s more concern and critique about the harm Miguel + the society stands to perpetuate out of fear by adhering so strongly to this framewor#framework* of canon (this hobie going 😬 at the go home machine) and how that harm stands to land directly on someone like miles by virtue of#the way the system operates. and it operates that way BECAUSE of fear of canon backlash#and of course someone like hobie is going to go fuck that I don’t want to be holding off on saving people and stringently pursuing canon#conformity because I’m scared#wow I’m just detailing the other post I’m making shdhdjfjfj#but yeah the tail end of THAT stream of thought for me is that I think while hobie was disillusioned and critical of this system its#actually miles that gives him hope of being able to change it when he saves the police officer#idk. a lot of extrapolation but I like to think on why hobie agreed to join and why he stays and how he interacts w the society despite#being deeply critical of it#it’s interesting#tunes talks spiderverse
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
oh hey western vs japanese binary i forgot about you
#umineko liveblog#back when it was more relevant i folded western/japanese up into detective/romantic#but i'm still not sure if that's an adequate way of getting at whatever meaning is trying to be conveyed with this dichotomy#i think here 'western' is being associated with kinzo's ideological imposition and the ensuing violence#but then you think back to eva and hideyoshi and how they were also stand ins for ambition and tradition#you know maybe this is the thematic framework i should have gotten more invested in lol
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
hate when cis people try to be like “i would only date/fuck/be friends with a trans man not a cis man because trans men are socialized to be [nicer, more empathetic, more pliable]!!!”. i’m not, i’ll treat you just as bad. fuck you
#disgusting behavior. taking peoples experiences and turning the conversation into about how you think it benefits you personally#especially when trans men's 'socialization' is often the worst thing that happened to us in our lives#biological essentialism is a fucking trip. 'socialization' is a red herring here. it's a matter of what one is born as to these people#and it's still the same ideological framework if turned into gender essentialism. it doesn't become better or more left wing
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
Rotating JJerusalem AU Francetto at the highest speed in my head, because Francesco values Dolcetto for seeing through all the class and order bullshit and values him as someone who is intellectually of his rank and who he will defend and behind closed doors treat as an equal, but it IS still medieval times and Francesco values his head upon his shoulders, so he also never openly challenges the social order nor would Dolcetto ever dream to suggest something like that. And Francesco expresses his affection also partly by reassuring Dolcetto of his high and deserved status.
Like, people outside the dominant social system have always existed and putting them back into the world via historical fiction, acknowledging that we haven't heard of them because they survived by being lowkey, is fun! It is not necessarily an ahistorical modern point of view if done right. But I just think that also trying to incorporate a worldview that is as similiar to ours as it is different can be a lot of fun in fiction.
#beablabbers#storie nostre#franci#dolco#I think about this a lot in my historical AUs#and I do take a lot of modern freedom bc goddamn are there many gay people#but I also do try to actually tell stories that one can't tell today bc the ideologies and frameworks are different#it is always extra fun when I think about how my different modern day devout characters of christian or muslim faith would map onto the#ancient world. What does being devout mean for a Roman or a Greek? Do characters actually differ in this frame work? Yes they would!
1 note
·
View note
Text
huge swaths of people are only "communists" because social media has rendered a lot of peoples' relationships to politics a shallow game of aesthetics and will turn around and blame communism for being shallow.
There's just certain segments of the "online left" who in like 5 years time if they do a heel turn and say "the communist social media brainwashing monopoly rly had me tricked when I was young and naive. Now im a nuanced social democrat who believes [...]" it rly wouldn't come as a surprise whatsoever
#like 70% of anarchists are basically operating on the exact moral and ideological framework of the protorypical joe biden voter#but with an even more stunted view of the machinations of politics.
594 notes
·
View notes
Text
Man I love finding a philosopher/sociologist/Analyzer-Of-Things that agrees with me. Like the feeling of thinking about something, forming an opinion, and then finding out other people ALSO thought about the thing AND reached the same conclusion as you is unmatched
#Peer validation my beloved#Plus if the person is suitably well known there’s gonna be debates on their work#And you can use that new data to cover your ideological blind spots#This post is about Douglas Adams btw#His work helped add so much definition to my framework for the world
0 notes
Text
universities linking to mental health resources in their press releases about student encampments r so disgusting like they constantly pivot to “mental health” as the framework for presenting ideological conflict, people are “understandably upset” about “difficult topics” and then they link to suicide hotlines and social worker appointment schedules like the thing people opposing genocide and apartheid really need is a therapist. & I know this is nothing new like institutions use psychiatry as a tool of controlling and managing oppressed people everywhere but it’s just another reminder in a sea of a thousand reminders that HR offices are one of the frontline ghouls of this fucking death spiral of imperialism. all to protect the right to massacre children
7K notes
·
View notes