#google chromeos

[warrenwoodhouse]

Google ChromiumOS

[techcree]

Google Suchergebnisse im Tab

Google testet eine neue Funktion in der Google Suche auf Chromebooks. Ergebnisse werden in einem Tab angezeigt.

Diese Funktion, welche ggf. auch bereits auf Deinem Chromebook funktioniert bedeutet, dass Du beispielsweise auf einer Website einen Text makierst und dann über rechte Maustaste auf "Websuche" klickst. Die Ergebnisse der Suche werden Dir dann in einem schmalen Bereich angezeigt, welcher sich dann im gleichen BrowserTab befindet. Man kann diesen Bereich dann auch größer ziehen. Das nennt sich #side-search und ist ein sogenannter Flagg, der auch aktiviert und deaktiviert werden kann.

Fall Du die Funktion auf Deinem Gerät nicht hast, kannst Du Sie als experimentelle Funktion aktivieren. Dazu musst Du im Broweser in der URL-Leiste die chrome//flags öffnen. Seit einiger Zeit werden die Flags auch in einem eignen Fenster geöffnet. Suche dort nach side-search. Ich habe die Fuktion nun einige Zeit getestet und mich dazu entschlossen diese wieder zu deaktivieren. Grund für mich ist, dass die Funktion zwei ganz schwerwigende Probleme mitsichbringt. Kurz ein Nutzen und zwei Probleme, das geht garnicht.

Problem Nummer eins ist ein dort verankerte Suche auf google.com und dies lässt sich auch nicht anpassen bspw. auf google.de. Das ist im bezug für Standortnahe Suche und einige andere Dinge kontraproduktiv. Ein weiteres und wie ich sehe viel schwerwiegenders Problem ist, dass Folgende: Klickt man dann in den seitlichen Ergebnissen auf eine der angebotenen Websites, Maps oder Bilder etc. wird das aktuelle Fenster verworfen. Möchte man dies umgehen muss man auf das kleine Fenster öffnen Symbol neben dem Fenster schließen Symbol klicken. Letztlich bekommt man damit einen zusätzlichen Arbeitsschritt eingebaut, der eigentlich nur Zeit kostet und keinen so richtigen Nutzen bringt.

Also habe ich diese Funktion nun wieder ausgeschaltet, denn sie ist im Sinne einer besseren Produktivität einfach nur hinderlich und lästig. Was die Entwickler sich dabei gedacht hatten oder erhofft hatten zu erreichen wird schon klar, doch die Umsetzung halte ich in den meißten Fällen, wenn wir die Suche in der Form nutzen für verfehlt. Sollten die Entwickler die wesentlichen zwei Probleme, wie sie mir bspw. aufgefallen waren nicht lösen wird diese Funktion die Nutzer mehr nerven als hilfreich sein.

Leider, leider ist es aktuell für viele Entwicklungen die da derzeit bei Google passieren sehr bezeichnend, dass die einfach alles andere als nützlich sind. Ich frage mich ernsthaft warum es nun bei Google in vielen Bereichen einfach nicht rund läuft. Naja, ich weiß es ja, aber ich darf es hier so nicht in Worte fassen ;-) Sagen wir es mal so, es gibt da eine Gruppe Entwickler aus einem ganz "bestimmten "Dunstkreis", die einfach lange nicht so gut sind wie immer behauptet wird.

[nixcraft]

[command-line-computer-virus]

I do not recommend Chromebooks

the OS is locked down in ways a PC is not and wiping the OS to install a Linux based alternative isn't all that simple.

hate how Google keeps pushing awful changes without the option to disable new "features". imagine an OS like this

the MAIN reason to never buy a chromebook is because they put the power button directly above the backspace key

typing something with purpose and fervency? well guess what? that mistake you made and tried to delete accidentally powered down your chromebook and now you lost everything you just typed. of course they blame this on incompatible hardware (like the bios has control over it) but this is demotrably not true. when the OS freezes, you MUST hold the power button down and fast tapping will do nothing. fast tapping the power button twice ONLY poweres down the computer when the OS is fully active. and I think they said something about acpi but basically everyone knows they can work with that just like we do on every other linux based OS on the planet. when there's a problem they don't feel like fixing, they don't even try to bs the end user and call it a feature, they straightup lie to people and say that it can't be fixed. heck, they make their money selling bulk contracts to schools and orgs where the person making the buying decision will never even use one. why should they care what the end user thinks when at home users only make up a fraction of their userbase?

[andresbravo2003]

ChromeOS Flex is great. It even runs Linux apps!

[biglisbonnews]

Google became the latest tech company to cut thousands of jobs after two years of hiring spree Google’s parent company Alphabet became the latest tech giant to announce layoffs.Read more... https://qz.com/google-tech-layoffs-2023-alphabet-sundar-pichai-1850010865

[phantomtrax]

My current ranking of OSes I've experienced is chrome < mac < windows < ubuntu

[govindhtech]

Check Out Chrome Enterprise Premium’s Latest Developments

Examine the most recent developments in Chrome Enterprise Premium.

The browser is the center of the modern office. Employees can work together, handle sensitive data, and access vital applications there. Because of this, the browser is crucial to security enforcement.

The most reliable business browser, Chrome Enterprise, just unveiled robust new features for Chrome Enterprise Premium that are intended to improve security, threat detection, and usability even further. Let’s investigate them.

Watermarking improves the avoidance of data loss

Now widely accessible, watermarking can help prevent data leaks by superimposing a semi-transparent, customizable watermark on vulnerable websites. The watermark clearly identifies the content as confidential when a user views a page that sets off a Data Loss Prevention (DLP) rule.

By raising security awareness, this visual reminder can help stop unwanted sharing. For instance, a company may set up watermarks to show up on websites that include private product designs or sensitive financial information.

By adding an additional degree of security, the watermark lets users know that the content they are viewing is private and shouldn’t be shared. Setting up watermarks is explained here.

Apply a watermark on specific webpages

Applies to Chrome browsers running on Windows, Mac, and Linux as well as controlled ChromeOS devices.

On websites that comply with the data protection guidelines you establish, you, as the administrator, can display a watermark with your own personalized text that shows up as a translucent watermark.

What you require

Chrome browser version 127 

Chrome Enterprise Premium license

Make a regulation for data protection

Open the Google Admin panel and log in.

Use a super administrator-level account to log in, not your existing one.

Navigate to Menu and then Rules in the admin console.

Click Create rule on the Rules page.

Pick Data protection from the drop-down option.

Enter the rule’s name and description in the Name field.

Choose which organizational units and/or groups are covered by this rule under Scope.

Click “Continue.”

Choose the apps you wish to secure your data in. Check the URL visited with Chrome.

Click “Continue.”

Define the data you want this rule to look for under Conditions. Select what to search for and what kind of content to scan URL or URL category.

Set your rule’s access level for context conditions. See Combine Data Loss Prevention rules with Context-Aware access conditions for information on access levels, including how to establish new ones.

Select an option for Actions:

Please note that adding a watermark is not required. The Add watermark over page content box can be checked or unchecked as necessary.

Only audit a watermark must be added. The Add watermark over page content box cannot be unchecked.

In the Add watermark over page content box, click the box if you choose Allow with warning.

Check the “Customize watermark” message box if you want to. In Chrome, type the words to have it appear as a translucent watermark text atop the page content. The webpage displays the default Confidential when left empty.

Note: The device/user ID, timestamp, and UTC time zone are displayed in both default and customized messages.

Choose from the Low, Medium, or High security levels for alerting.

(Optional) Check the Send to alert center box to report incidents in the alert center, where you can see notifications about possible problems and take action to fix them. In this step, add recipients if you would like to receive email notifications.

Click “Continue.”

Examine the requirements for your regulation.

Click “Create.”

Advanced URL filtering

Advanced URL filtering and threat detection

A key component of any safe business browser is URL filtering. Now that Chrome Enterprise Premium has an optional audit-only mode for URL filtering, managers may keep an eye on user profiles and behavior in corporately managed browsers without preventing access to the filtered websites. Businesses can use the audit-only mode to improve URL filtering rules, block dangerous websites, and train staff on safe surfing techniques. It also offers useful insights into security concerns and risky user behavior.

What is URL filtering?

As a security mechanism, URL filtering limits access to particular websites or web pages according to their Uniform Resource Locator (URL). Network gateways, internet service providers (ISPs), or individual devices are some of the different levels at which it can be applied.

Using Chrome Security Insights to streamline security management

Chrome Security Insights gives Chrome Enterprise Core users visibility into possible attacks while streamlining security monitoring. Administrators only need to click a few times to:

Turn on automatic security event logging and Chrome Enterprise Connectors;

To check for sensitive data transfers, turn on 50 popular DLP detectors; additionally,

Provide informative reports about the people, domains, and data types engaged in high-risk operations.

Administrators may detect and handle any insider risk and data exfiltration incidents more rapidly by using Chrome Security Insights, which lessens the work involved in setting up and maintaining DLP policies. By taking a proactive approach to security, firms may reduce the impact of any breaches and stay ahead of threats.

Chrome Security Insights enables IT teams to concentrate on other important duties while preserving a high degree of security by streamlining security management. Any organization utilizing Chrome Enterprise Core may easily activate this capability, which is presently in preview, right from the Google Admin console home page.

Proceed to the next phase

Chrome Enterprise Premium pricing

Pay-as-you-go pricing is available for Chrome Enterprise Premium. You just pay for what you use with its flexible pricing structure. It’s an affordable option to get Chrome Enterprise Premium’s cutting-edge security capabilities without committing to a long-term plan.

Chrome Enterprise Premium is currently available for self-service activation via the Google Cloud console.

A risk-free, 60-day free trial is another way to get a firsthand look at Chrome Enterprise Premium’s cutting-edge security capabilities. You can easily switch to pay-as-you-go pricing after the trial period, which enables you to scale your usage and only pay for what you require

Read more on govindhtech.com

[winnycorp]

ChromeOS 128で複数の脆弱性が修正 ～ ゼロデイ脆弱性も含む

[geek-on-record]

Pixelbook: the ultimate Chromebook revival for 2024

I fell in love with the Pixelbook about two months ago. I saw a coworker at Google using one, and I was immediately impressed by its extreme thinness. The Pixelbook is as thin as two USB-C ports stacked. Why hadn’t I paid any attention to such a beautiful device until now? The forgotten Chromebook Chromebooks were first announced in 2011, and I admit I ignorantly dismissed them as cheap laptops…

[galwednesday]

Tweeting and tweeting in the widening pyre, The content does not hear the moderator; Things fall apart; the timeline cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The perma-banned tide is loosed, and everywhere, The ceremony of fact-checking is drowned; Blue checks lack all conviction, while the rest Are full of vicious muskrat parody.

Surely some great disruption is at hand; Surely the Social Network is at hand. The Social Network! Hardly are those words out When a vast image out of Silicon Valley Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of desert A shape part mastodon with the head of a bird, Ad space blank and pitiless as the sun, Assembles venture capital, while all about it Reel shadows of indignant ethics boards. The darkness drops again; but now I know That two decades of algorithmic sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a leveraged buyout. And what hellsite, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards seed funding to be born?

the old hellsite is dying. the new hellsite struggles to be born: now is the time of posters

[richdadpoor]

Timer, Dice, Pac-Man—11 Tricks You Can Do With Google Search

Getting Google to search the web for you is all well and good, but there’s a ton of functionality available through the simple-looking box on the world’s most-visited website. You could call these bonus features, or Easter eggs, or hidden tricks—but they’re all useful in your own way, and can be launched by heading to google.com. Google’s Antitrust Case Is the Best Thing That Ever Happened to…

[feymorgaina]

I would support something like Stadia again. Cross-platform playing (Windows, Linux, Mac, ChromeOS (really web), Android, or web) and being able to play on different devices (PC, Chromebook, tablet, mobile phone) was its biggest pull for me. GeForce Now is similar, but not quite the same (you need to have bought the game already on something like Steam or Epic Games) and you need a subscription for priority access and longer games sessions. On Stadia, you could have just bought the game outright and played across different devices/platforms - didn't need a subscription.

The biggest reason I didn't play as much on Stadia as I would've liked was my lousy internet. Long story short, I lost cable internet access a few years back and have been using DSL since. DSL works but not nearly as well as cable internet. C'est la vie. 🤷 Either way, I'd still support something like Stadia again. 👍

[techcree]

chromeOS Update wiedermal voller Murks

immer mal wieder gibt es Anlass zur Verärgerung wenn uns Google ein Update für sein Chromebook Betriebssystem ausliefert.

Es kommt einfach so. Ohne Ankündigung oder irgendwelche Hinweise über die anstehenden Änderungen bzw. Neuerungen. Und dann ist es da und immer wieder gibt es Anlass zum Kopfschütteln. So auch in der neuesten Version 110.0.5481.32 (Offizieller Build) beta (64-Bit). Und nein, auch in der Beta ist das nicht in Ordnung. Jetzt murksten die Entwickler in der Textskalierung herum und im Entwicklerbereich macht sich das bei Linux-Apps negativ bemerkbar. Da kann man in den App Einstellungen versuchen es zu korrigieren, doch es passt einfach nicht mehr. Plötzlich ist der Text der Menuezeile viel zu klein. Symbole viel zu groß und wenn sich Fenster öffnen bspw. um zu Speichern, dann muss das Fenster angepasst werden um überhaupt etwas sehen zu können.

In meinem Beispiel hat es auch die Thonny IDE Anwendung, die auf Chromebooks im Linux Container läuft erwischt. Nicht das erste mal und zudem sehr ärgerlich, weil es von Google selbst ja keine Lösung gibt die es mit Anwnedungen dieser Art und Qualität aufnehmen kann. So jedenfalls kann man nicht arbeiten und man muss sich doch die Frage stellen was schaffen die da bei Google derzeit, weil iirgendwie so ziemlich alles schlechter funktioniert als vorher.

Auch bei anderen Google Produkten merklich zu spühren bis hin zum Google Assistenten. In chromeOS kann man mit der neuen version die Versionsnummer im Launcher sehen. Vorher reichte es dazu die Einstellungen aufzurufen und dort nachzuschauen. Das nenne ich mal völlig überflüssig. Sowas braucht kein Mensch. Dafür aber kracht es gewaltig an vielen anderen Stellen in dieser neuen Version. Da sollte Google eher einen Schritt zurück zur Vorgängerversion machen, denn so macht das keinen Spaß.

Nicht das erste mal. Schon häufiger schafften die Updates mehr Probleme als Nutzen. Das sowas dann sogar in der Beta landet ist unverständlich. Im Dev Channel muss man damit wohl leben, doch in der Beta? Nicht wirklich nachvollziehbar. Noch garnicht lange her konnte man einige Linux Anwendungen wochenlang garnicht mehr nutzen, weil wieder heftig gemurkst wurde. Bleibt nur zu hoffen das diese Fehler schnell behoben werden und es nicht wieder Wochen dauert bis mal was einfach sauber funktioniert.

Hier also die offizielle Botschaft an Google: "Macht das ganz und sonst gilt die Regel - macht es gleich richtig".

[krystal-blossom]

Fluttershy would be too scared to even use a smartphone, I bet

Twilight Sparkle would totally be an Arch Linux poweruser.

Rainbow Dash would probably use a decked-out Windows PC for gaming, but fall shitty tech trends without question (AI art, NFTs, etc)

(Flim and Flam would be the ones pushing the AI art and Web3 shit)

Rarity would probably be snobbish and use a Macbook, before either raging like a beast or sobbing whenever it randomly breaks.

Fluttershy would be likely be way too scared to even use a computer, until her friends pressure her into getting a cheap Chromebook so she could at least get online. Even then, she would mostly use sites like Facebook to post about the most mundane shit imaginable, while likely unaware what exactly a "meme" is.

Pinkie Pie would be extremely reckless and use an outdated version of Windows without being aware, while constantly infecting her PC with viruses and crapware. In addition, she would probably get frequently contacted by tech support scammers, think they're actually from tech support, but annoy them too much with her Pinkie Pie antics for them to really do anything.

Applejack would be total luddite who only upgrades Windows very reluctantly. She doesn't even like to use her computer that much, but when she does, she just wants it to "get shit done" without having to deal with annoying gimmicks.

[shinelikethunder]

Hello there! I hope you don’t mind me just dropping into your asks like this, but by all means def feel free to just delete this if so, it is kind of a weird ask.

This is the anon from the computer blog asking about a private laptop for collage! After doing (a small amount of) research into Linux, one thing that’s super confusing to me, is… how does one know which distro to use? You mentioned in the replies of the post that you use Ubuntu Linux, which seems to be one of the more popular ones. Would you recommend — and if so, why? Is it good for privacy, do you think? The best? Does the user need to have a good deal of experience with computers to keep it running? (I’ve never used a laptop before but I don’t mind trying to learn stuff)

Also this is an EXTREMELY stupid question my apologies, but how….. exactly do you put Linux on a laptop? OP from my ask said to buy a laptop with no OS but is that something you can do? I’d think so, since 0P works with computer and stuff as their job, but Reddit says that it’s not really possible and that you should just “buy like a Windows laptop and scrap the software”??? Is that… correct? How did you install Linux on your laptop — did y ou have to remove software off it or did you, as OP says, manage to find a laptop with no OS?

Again, feel free to ignore if you don’t wanna put in the time/effort to reply to this, I absolutely don’t mind — it’s a lot of stuff I’m asking and you didn’t invite it all, so ofc feel free to delete the ask if you’d like!

ha, you've zeroed in on one of the big reasons Linux is kind of a contrarian choice for me to recommend: the wild proliferation of distros, many of them hideously complex to work with. luckily, the fact that most of them are niche offshoots created by and for overly-technical nerds makes the choice easier: you don't want those. you want one of the largest, best-supported, most popular ones, with a reputation for being beginner-friendly. the two biggies are Ubuntu and Linux Mint; i'd recommend focusing your research there.

this isn't JUST a popularity-contest thing: the more people use it, the more likely you are to find answers if you're having trouble or plugging a weird error message into google, and the greater the variety of software you'll find packaged for easy install in that distro. some combination of professional and broad-based community support means you'll find better documentation and tutorials, glitches will be rarer and get fixed faster, and the OS is less likely to be finicky about what hardware it'll play nice with. the newbie-friendly ones are designed to be a breeze to install and to not require technical fiddling to run them for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, media viewing, file management, and such.

info on installation, privacy, personal endorsement, etc under the cut. tl;dr: most computers can make you a magic Linux-installing USB stick, most Linuces are blessedly not part of the problem on privacy, Ubuntu i can firsthand recommend but Mint is probably also good.

almost all Linux distros can be assumed to be better for privacy than Windows or MacOS, because they are working from a baseline of Not Being One Of The Things Spying On You; some are managed by corporations (Ubuntu is one of them), but even those corporations have to cater to a notoriously cantankerous userbase, so most phoning-home with usage data tends to be easy to turn off and sponsored bullshit kept minimally intrusive. the one big exception i know of is Google's bastard stepchild ChromeOS, which you really don't want to be using, for a wide variety of reasons. do NOT let someone talk you into installing fucking Qubes or something on claims that it's the "most private" or "most secure" OS; that's total user-unfriendly overkill unless you have like a nation-state spy agency or something targeting you, specifically.

how to install Linux is also not a dumb question! back in the day, if you wanted to, say, upgrade a desktop computer from Windows 95 to Windows 98, you'd receive a physical CD-ROM disc whose contents were formatted to tell the computer "hey, i'm not a music CD or a random pile of backup data or a piece of software for the OS to run, i want you to run me as the OS next time you boot up," and then that startup version would walk you through the install.

nowadays almost anyone with a computer can create a USB stick that'll do the same thing: you download an Ubuntu installer and a program that can perform that kind of formatting, plug in the USB stick, tell the program to put the installer on it and make it bootable, and then once it's done, plug the USB stick into the computer you want to Linuxify and turn it on.

Ubuntu has an excellent tutorial for every step of the install process, and an option to do a temporary test install so you can poke around and see how you like it without pulling the trigger irreversibly: https://ubuntu.com/tutorials/install-ubuntu-desktop

having a way to create a bootable USB stick is one reason to just get a Windows computer and then let the Linux installer nuke everything (which i think is the most common workflow), but in a pinch you can also create the USB on a borrowed/shared computer and uninstall the formatter program when you're done. i don't have strong opinions on what kind of laptop to get, except "if you do go for Linux, be sure to research in advance whether the distro is known to play nice with your hardware." i'm partial to ThinkPads but that's just, like, my opinion, man. lots of distros' installers also make it dead simple to create a dual-boot setup where you can pick between Windows and Linux at every startup, which is useful if you know you might have to use Windows-only software for school or something. keep in mind, though, that this creates two little fiefdoms whose files and hard-disk space aren't shared at all, and it is not a beginner-friendly task to go in later and change how much storage each OS has access to.

i've been using the distro i'm most familiar with as my go-to example throughout, but i don't really have a strong opinion on Ubuntu vs Mint, simply because i haven't played around with Mint enough to form one. Ubuntu i'll happily recommend as a beginner-friendly version of Linux that's reasonably private by default. (i think there's like one install step where Canonical offers paid options, telemetry, connecting online accounts, etc, and then respects your "fuck off" and doesn't bug you about it again.) by reputation, Mint has a friendlier UI, especially for people who are used to Windows, and its built-in app library/"store" is slicker but offers a slightly more limited ecosystem of point-and-click installs.

(unlike Apple and Google, there are zero standard Linux distros that give a shit if you manually install software from outside the app store, it's just a notoriously finicky process that could take two clicks or could have you tearing your hair out at 3am. worth trying if the need arises, but not worth stressing over if you can't get it to work.)

basic software starter-pack recommendations for any laptop (all available on Windows and Mac too): Firefox with the uBlock Origin and container tab add-ons, VLC media player, LibreOffice for document editing. the closest thing to a dealbreaking pain in the ass about Linux these days (imo) is that all the image and video editing software i know of is kinda janky in some way, so if that's non-negotiable you may have to dual-boot... GIMP is the godawfully-clunky-but-powerful Photoshop knockoff, and i've heard decent things about Pinta as a mid-weight image editor roughly equivalent to Paint.net for Windows.