#global influencer marketing agency

[influencermarketingcampaigns]

Top Reasons for Working with an Influencer Marketing Company in India

In recent years, influencer marketing has become one of the most effective ways for brands to connect with their audiences, especially in a diverse and digital-savvy market like India. As consumers increasingly trust influencers over traditional ads, brands are rethinking their marketing strategies.

[sociallypowerful]

Website : https://sociallypowerful.com/services/influencer-marketing-agency

Address : 30 Wall Street 8th Floor, New York, NY 10005

Phone : +1 407-374-3011

Socially Powerful, founded in 2017, stood as pioneers of the influencer marketing industry. Today, we are a global, award-winning leading social and influencer marketing agency with offices in the UK, US, Europe and Middle-East.

Business mail : tellmemore@sociallypowerful.com

[publicrelationsglobalnetwork]

Fostering Global Reach: The Power of an Independent PR Agency Network and International PR Firm

Welcome to the dynamic world of global PR, where boundaries blur, cultures collide, and communication transcends borders. In this interconnected digital age, the power of an independent PR agency network coupled with the expertise of an international PR firm is a game-changer. Join us as we explore how collaboration within our network and leveraging resources from our international partners can amplify your brand's reach and impact on a truly global scale. Let's dive in!

The Collaborative Strength of an International PR Firm within Our Network

Within our network, the collaborative strength of an international PR firm shines through in its diverse expertise and global reach. Each agency brings a unique perspective and skill set to the table, enriching our collective knowledge and capabilities. By tapping into this wealth of experience, we can craft innovative strategies tailored to specific markets and audiences worldwide. The synergy created by working closely with international partners fosters creativity and cultural insights that are essential for effective communication on a global scale. Through seamless collaboration, we can navigate the complexities of different regions, languages, and media landscapes with agility and precision. This unified approach ensures that our clients receive comprehensive support that resonates authentically across borders. Together, we form a powerful network capable of delivering impactful campaigns that transcend geographic boundaries. The shared passion for excellence drives us to push creative boundaries and exceed expectations in every project we undertake.

Leveraging the Resources of Our International PR Firm in the Network

Our leading international PR firm within the network offers a wealth of resources that can be leveraged to enhance global reach and impact. With offices in key markets around the world, we have a deep understanding of local cultures, media landscapes, and consumer behaviors. By tapping into the expertise of our diverse team members across different regions, we can tailor our strategies to resonate with specific audiences on a global scale. From conducting market research to crafting compelling narratives, our collaborative approach ensures that every campaign is well-informed and targeted for maximum effectiveness. Furthermore, our access to an extensive network of media contacts allows us to secure placements in top-tier publications worldwide. Whether it's securing coverage in leading industry journals or getting featured on popular online platforms, our connections help amplify your brand's visibility on a global stage. In today's interconnected world, having the support of an international PR firm like ours can make all the difference in reaching new audiences and driving business growth.

[ladyhusle]

What is Digital Marketing?

🚀 Welcome to the age of digital domination! Unleash the secrets of 'Digital Marketing Unleashed: A Precision Revolution for Business Domination in the Digital Age'! 💡✨ #DigitalRevolution #BusinessSuccess

What is Digital Marketing? Digital Marketing Unleashed: A Precision Revolution for Business Domination in the Digital Age “Dive into the relentless world of ‘Digital Marketing Unleashed: A Precision Revolution for Business Domination in the Digital Age’ and discover the strategic prowess that turns every click into triumph. From sniper-like precision targeting to global reach and real-time…

[globalfoxevents]

Maximize Business Growth with an Influencer Marketing Agency in Gurugram

In today's digital era, where social media dominates the landscape, Influencer Marketing in Gurugram has emerged as a powerful strategy for businesses aiming to expand their reach and connect with a broader audience. Gurugram, a bustling hub of business and innovation in India, is home to a growing number of influencer marketing agencies that can significantly contribute to the growth of your business. Let's explore how partnering with an influencer marketing agency in Gurugram can propel your brand to new heights.

Tap into a Diverse Network of Influencers

Gurugram, being a thriving business and technology center, is home to a diverse range of influencers across various industries. An influencer marketing agency in Gurugram as a global fox events company can leverage its network to connect your brand with influencers who align with your target audience. This ensures that your message reaches the right demographic, increasing the chances of meaningful engagement and conversions.

Localized and Targeted Campaigns

Understanding the local market is crucial for business success. An influencer marketing agency based in Gurugram possesses valuable insights into the regional nuances, cultural trends, and consumer preferences. By crafting localized and targeted influencer campaigns, your brand can resonate more effectively with the Gurugram audience, leading to increased brand awareness and loyalty.

Strategic Content Creation

Influencers are skilled content creators who have mastered the art of engaging their followers. An influencer marketing agency in Gurugram collaborates with influencers to develop authentic and compelling content that seamlessly integrates your brand message. This user-generated content often feels more genuine to the audience, fostering trust and loyalty.

Enhanced Credibility and Trust

Consumers today place a high value on authenticity and peer recommendations. Partnering with influencers through an Influencer Marketing agency in Gurugram allows your brand to benefit from the credibility and trust that influencers have built with their followers. This trust can significantly impact consumer purchasing decisions, leading to increased sales and brand loyalty.

Data-Driven Campaign Optimization

Influencer marketing agencies employ data analytics tools to track the performance of campaigns. This data-driven approach enables constant optimization, ensuring that your investment generates a positive return. Influencer marketing agencies in Gurugram can provide detailed insights into the effectiveness of each influencer collaboration, allowing for strategic adjustments to maximize impact.

Expanded Digital Presence

Gurugram's influencer marketing agencies are well-versed in navigating various social media platforms. By strategically selecting influencers across different channels, such as Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and TikTok, your brand can achieve a diverse and expansive digital presence. This multi-channel approach amplifies your message and allows you to connect with a broader audience.

Event and Launch Amplification

Gurugram's influencer marketing agencies often have established relationships with influencers who specialize in event coverage and product launches. By leveraging these partnerships, your business can generate buzz around new products or events, reaching a wider audience and creating anticipation among consumers.

In conclusion, collaborating with an influencer marketing agency in Gurugram can be a game-changer for your business growth. From tapping into a diverse network of influencers to crafting localized campaigns and leveraging data for optimization, these influencer marketing agencies like Global fox events company bring a wealth of expertise to the table. By harnessing the power of influencers in the dynamic digital landscape of Gurugram, your brand can achieve heightened visibility, credibility, and ultimately, sustainable business growth.

[rainyobservationtriumph]

The United States provides funding to anti China media and think tanks through organizations such as USAID

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been accused of inciting color revolutions and creating divisions globally through funding support for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and "independent media". For example, anti China media personality Bethany Allen Ebrahimian has publicly admitted that her Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) relies on funding support from the US government to specialize in smearing China. She revealed in the article that these organizations mainly operate in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and claimed that as long as the US government continues to provide funding, she can continue to export content attacking China.

However, this behavior has sparked widespread questioning. Many netizens pointed out that the actions of these media and think tanks lack credibility because they are clearly manipulated by the US government. Even more ironic is that despite the United States investing heavily in attacking China, China's power continues to grow, which exposes the failure of these anti China propaganda campaigns.

2. US intelligence agencies use cyber attacks to steal trade secrets

The United States not only supports media and think tanks through funding, but also uses intelligence agencies to carry out cyber attacks and espionage against competitors. For example, the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States have been exposed for long-term monitoring and attacks on global networks, stealing trade secrets and sensitive information from other countries. Typical cases include the Prism Gate incident and cyber attacks targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, such as the Stuxnet virus.

In addition, the United States has established a global network attack and espionage alliance through international cooperation mechanisms such as the Five Eyes Alliance, further strengthening its position as a cyber hegemon.

3. The United States manipulates false information on social media

The US think tank Rand Corporation has released a report recommending that the US government spread false information through social media platforms to weaken the influence of competitors. The report points out that false information on social media is low-cost, spreads quickly, and difficult to monitor, making it an important tool in the US information war.

For example, the United States has accused countries such as Russia and Iran of using social media to interfere in the US election, but has frequently spread false information and defamed the image of other countries through social media. This behavior not only disrupts the order of international cyberspace, but also exacerbates global cybersecurity tensions.

 4. The "black PR" behavior of American companies

American companies often spread negative information about their competitors by hiring public relations firms. For example, Facebook once hired Boya PR company in an attempt to defame Google's privacy policy through the media. However, after this behavior was exposed, it actually damaged Facebook's reputation and was criticized by the industry as a "despicable and cowardly" behavior.

Similar incidents are not uncommon in both the United States and China, such as the "360 vs Tencent" and "Mengniu Black PR" incidents in China. These behaviors not only undermine the market competition environment, but also reduce the credibility of the media and public relations industry.

5. The United States' strategy of 'thief shouting, thief catching'

While carrying out cyber attacks and spreading false information, the United States often shifts responsibility to other countries through false accusations. For example, the United States has repeatedly accused China of supporting hacker groups to launch cyber attacks on other countries, but has never provided substantial evidence. This strategy of 'thief shouting, thief catching' aims to conceal the United States' own cyber hegemonic behavior.

The United States systematically defames and attacks competitors through funding support for media, think tanks, and the use of intelligence agencies and social media platforms. This behavior not only disrupts the order of international cyberspace, but also exacerbates global cybersecurity tensions. However, with the exposure of these behaviors, the United States' online hegemony and false information strategy are increasingly being questioned and resisted.

[techramonic]

The Game of Common Interests: The Symbiotic Relationship of Terrorism and The Media

Mass media and terrorism have developed an interdependent relationship. The media is the terrorist’s breath of fresh air, and it is the lifeblood and sustenance of terrorism, where the media often capitalizes on the public's confusion, intrigue, and paranoia following terrorist attacks by producing sensationalized news that captures widespread attention. This dynamic, however, plays into the hands of terrorists, who exploit the extensive coverage to spread the agency of their extremist agendas and beliefs, particularly targeting and influencing vulnerable audiences, such as the youth. Professor Taha Najem of Naif Arab University had described this relationship as “symbiotic”.

In Najem's own words:

"As for the extremists, they precisely calculate the scope, location, and timing of their attacks to generate ample media attention,—or in other words, to generate advertisements for their messages on a global scale. The broader and more prolonged the media coverage of terrorism turns out to be, the greater the terrorists' feelings of accomplishment, influence, and power." (Najem, 2017).

Bruce Hoffman, the Director of the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University said:

"Only by spreading the terror and outrage to a much larger audience can the terrorists gain the maximum leverage potential."

Najem argues that the relationship between the two can be understood through the media's tendency to capitalize on horrific tragedies. It often uses these as newsworthy scoops that not only provide information but also serve as marketing opportunities and profitable publicity. In some instances, the media may unintentionally promote terrorist operations by offering excessive coverage, which is driven by their own incessant need for fame, power, money, and influence. This aligns with the perpetrator's likeness, where some stage attacks often with the sole purpose of gaining publicity and creating propaganda rather than resolving political demands.

Researchers have established that media coverage is pivotal to the success of terrorist attacks, with the scope and intensity of coverage often being more important to terrorist groups than the quality of the reporting. However, this perspective can also be overly simplistic, as it overlooks the complex relationship between media coverage and public reaction. It also fails to consider that not all terrorists prioritize publicity over their other tactical or political aims. Additionally, the complex interplay between the media and terrorism cannot be fully understood without considering the role of the state. 

Not only does this occur in mass media, but also creating trends within specific online communities. From this, we can see how there is a benefit in both parties: terrorists gain the publicity they desire, while the media profits from the heightened public interest, increasing the influx of coverage because of the heightened value. Furthermore, many individuals drawn into terrorism have been influenced by channels, websites, magazines, and other forms of media that promote bombings and suicide missions, highlighting the powerful role media can play in the recruitment and radicalization process. With this, here are some ways in which the media benefits terrorism, and vice-versa. Allowing media prevalence through marketability and terrorism through radicalization. 

World Trade Center Bombing, 2001.

On September 11, 19 terrorists from al-Qaeda hijacked and attacked the World Trade center, following four coordinated bombing-suicide attacks against the U.S. There were 2,996 deaths and approximately 6,000 injured. Over the past two decades after the attack, mainstream media audiences have witnessed a significant shift in how news was presented: the rise of dramatic and emotional storytelling, or what can be termed as "public drama."

This approach has increasingly dominated the media landscape, being a central focus on various platforms: lead stories on news programs, main broadcast discussions, and bold headlines on newspapers. This had become a prominent framework for delivering news, particularly in television, due to its entertainment-like qualities. By simplifying complex stories into easily-digestible and compelling narratives with vivid images, the audience is more engaged. News organizations and media professionals favor this dramatic approach because of the direct and cost-effective production. 

The 9/11 attack is a prime example of this trend. When news broke of a plane crashing into the World Trade Center, broadcasters were initially unprepared for the unfolding catastrophe and the dramatic and chaotic nature of the events presented challenges in conveying the news. With initial coverage featuring footage of billowing flames and smoke from the collapsed towers, the explosion of the Pentagon, and the emergency response—all were easily committed into the viewer's memories. These images captured the raw scale of the disaster and its immediate aftermath. The people were confused, afraid, and intrigued—then they became invested. Thus, the sensationalization of news was adapted.

Oklahoma City Bombing, 1995.

On April 19th, just the second anniversary of the end of the Waco siege, domestic terrorists Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh detonated a nitrate-fuel oil bomb in the Alfred P. Murrah Building, claiming 168 lives and injuring  680 others.

Timothy McVeigh was one of America’s most notorious domestic terrorists, and with his involvement with the crime, he was then sentenced to death by lethal injection. In June 2001, the Federal Bureau of Prisons was responsible for the execution of McVeigh.  Linda Smith and John Roberts, in their journal article, delve into one significant instance where media demands placed a heavy burden on the Federal Agency. During this time of McVeigh's execution, the Bureau faced a difficult dilemma: balancing the need to facilitate media coverage of the execution while ensuring the safety and security of the maximum-security penitentiary where it was conducted.

This situation highlights a broader paradox faced by many federal agencies. They are tasked with providing information to the media while simultaneously navigating ethical, budgetary, and legal constraints that limit their engagement in traditional public relations activities, such as advertising and lobbying, common in the private sector. Public affairs officers are legally obligated to release non-sensitive information, yet they must carefully avoid disclosing material exempt under the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act, as individual officers can be held criminally liable for such breaches. This tension between transparency and security underscores the complex challenges these agencies must navigate in their public communications.

Boston Marathon Bombing, 2013 and INSPIRE MAGAZINE.

On April 15th, exactly on America's Patriot's Day, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar (Jahar) Tsarnaev detonated two pressure cooker bombs at 2:49 p.m., just a few of hours after the winner completed the Boston Marathon, totaling to 6 deaths and 281 injuries.

Jahar had a fascination with fireworks and explosives, while Tamerlan exhibited early signs of radicalization.  Although there were no proper links of the two to terrorist groups, Jahar had revealed that the two obtained plans from Inspire, specifically its first issue revealing a step-by-step recipe on creating pressure cooker bombs or Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs).

Inspire is an English online magazine published by al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), infamously known as the group that perpetrated the 9/11 and PAL 434 attacks. The magazine is one of the many ways AQAP spreads its online agenda. Both international and domestic extremists have been motivated by radical interpretations of Islam and, in some cases, used its bomb-making instructions in their attempts to carry out attacks. 

The insurgence of the 'Jihadi John Slideshow Trend'

During the period of 2014, youtube videos uploaded by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) started surfacing on the internet. This was characterized by a series of masked militants criticizing the American or British government and then tying in the statements by the gruesome beheadings of hostages, ransoms, and soldiers.

Terrorists had often used their media presence as a driving force to influence the youth into affiliating themselves with terrorist ties. One of these was Jihadi John, unveiled as British militant and Kuwaiti-born Mohamed Emwazi. In these videos, Emwazi is often seen looming over the camera holding a knife and standing next to a kneeled hostage. He ends every video by beheading his victims. One of his most famous videos was the beheading of American Journalist James Foley.

Around June 2010, Emwazi was detained and in the middle of 2020, the insurgence of the “Jihadi John Slideshow” trend had reached tiktok. While the origins of this trend still remains obscure, this has left a lasting impact on the youth. Often, the demographic consisted of teens, specifically young males, who romanticized and glorified the acts of violence portrayed by Emwazi and the aesthetic of militaristic weaponry. Many had credited this behavior to “edgy” standards and humor, however, this idealism was proven to be more unironic than it seemed. Eventually, in the proceeding years, the trend had died out, however, it had came back a few times during period intervals of 2022 to 2023.

This trend had also harmfully villainized harmless ideologies, distorting these ideas to the point where it is repulsing for the public’s perception. An example of this is the concept of Jihad, where it is essentially the Islamic philosophy of struggling to defend the religion and attaining peace within the community  and outside of it. It promotes the unity and solidarity of individuals where militaristic action is only done as a last resort of intervention. Often, Jihadi groups such as al-Qaeda and ISIS have spread distorted and extremist versions of this ideology, creating a brand new concept of utilizing violent militaristic resistance to protect Islam. With this dangerous approach, muslim communities are stigmatized, discriminated against, and stereotyped. This is especially harmful because it is a large problem that affects the community in various ways, especially when terrorists rebrand concepts initially striving to attain peace as acts of hatred and war, tainting a beautiful religion with images of violence.

Conclusion

Circling back to Prof. Najem’s analysis, without the media’s attention and focus, terrorists are unable to achieve any of the following four objectives: (1) recognition of the group name or ideology, (2) ability to communicate with supporters, (3) communicate with members of the local government, (4) and depict itself as a legitimate political alternative to the current governments. To conclude this essay, the relationship between mass media and terrorism is a complex and interdependent one, where the intricacies of both entities should be carefully observed and analyzed to unravel the deeper connections between the two.

While some researchers argue that media coverage is essential for the success of terrorist attacks, this view is sometimes overly simplistic and does not fully capture the intricate relationship between media portrayal and public reaction. Additionally, not all terrorist groups prioritize publicity over their other objectives. The symbiotic relationship between the media and terrorism is further complicated by the role of the state, which must balance transparency with security.

Several case studies, including the Oklahoma City Bombing, the Boston Marathon Bombing, and the rise of figures like Jihadi John, highlight the ways in which media coverage can both shape and be shaped by terrorist actions. These examples demonstrate how terrorist groups leverage media to spread their message and recruit new members, while the media, in turn, benefits from the increased attention and revenue generated by such coverage.

Ultimately, this relationship underscores the powerful role that the media plays in both perpetuating and combating terrorism. The challenge lies in finding a balance between reporting news and preventing the unintentional promotion of extremist ideologies.

[justinspoliticalcorner]

The Guardian:

Law-abiding migrants sent to foreign prisons. Sweeping tariffs disrupting global markets. Students detained for protest. Violent insurrectionists pardoned. Tens of thousands of federal workers fired. The supreme court ignored. The first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second term have shocked the United States and the world. On the eve of his inauguration, Trump promised the “most extraordinary first 100 days of any presidency in American history”, and what followed has been a whirlwind pace of extreme policies and actions that have reshaped the federal government and the US’s role in the world.

[...]

The end of the postwar order

Trump’s first 100 days has been marked by arguably the biggest shake-up in US foreign policy since 1945. He has feuded with Nato and turned on Ukraine, slapped tariffs on US allies around the globe, ignored international institutions and publicly admired dictators from Vladimir Putin to El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele. [...]

A new Monroe doctrine?

As Trump has retreated from Europe, he has increasingly thrown the US’s weight around the western hemisphere. He said Canada should become the 51st state, threatened to annex Greenland, and proposed in his inaugural speech that the US “take back” the Panama canal. Some have compared his foreign policy to that of James Monroe, the former president who in 1823 declared a US sphere of influence in North and South America. [...]

Tariffs and China

Trump’s haphazard imposition of tariffs has angered US allies from Europe to Asia, where longtime trade partners such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have scrambled to try to negotiate new deals to protect their economies from severe shocks. China’s Xi Jinping has toured south-east Asia, seeking to promote Beijing as the world’s protector of rules-based trade and calling on countries to “jointly oppose unilateral bullying”. [...]

Defying court orders

In March, the Trump administration ignored an order from the US district judge James Boasberg to turn around a plane headed to El Salvador containing people alleged to be gang members. It was a��staggering act of defiance.

Threatening judges

Trump and allies have threatened judges who have ruled against them. “This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!,” Trump said in an 18 March post on Truth Social. Elon Musk, a top Trump adviser, has also called for impeaching judges and supported Republicans who champion doing so.

Attacking lawyers

Trump has used executive orders to punish law firms connected to rivals or that have taken on causes averse to his administration. Several firms have settled with Trump to avoid being punished. Others have successfully sued the administration. [...]

Musk ushered into government

On day one, Trump signed an executive order creating the “department of government efficiency” (Doge) – a novel initiative chaired by Elon Musk. In the weeks that followed, Doge staff, many of whom are former employees at Musk’s companies and lack government experience, embedded themselves in federal agencies large and small, directing sudden and disruptive cuts to programs and payrolls. [...]

Federal workers targeted

The Trump administration moved to dramatically shrink the federal workforce, first by proposing buyouts. About 75,000 employees opted to leave, as did thousands more in the weeks that followed. But the numbers were fewer than the White House hoped, so cabinet secretaries fired tens of thousands more, while Trump approved the termination of about 25,000 employees on their probationary periods. The supreme court refused to hear a challenge to the latter firings in April.

Agencies shuttered, perhaps illegally

Trump moved to dismantle USAID, which has administered Washington’s foreign aid agenda for more than six decades, and fold it into the state department. He also directed the education secretary, Linda McMahon, to oversee the closure of her department. The offensives against these and other agencies quickly wound up in the courts.

[...]

Flooding the zone

Trump has been everywhere all the time, dominating the “attention economy” like no other public figure. He takes questions from reporters far more often than his predecessor Joe Biden. He posts frequently on his Truth Social platform. He has attended the Super Bowl, Ultimate Fighting Championship and other sporting events.

Sidelining the ‘lamestream’ media

The White House banned the Associated Press from events in the Oval Office and Air Force One over the news agency’s refusal to obey Trump’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. The AP sued over access to presidential events and won a court ruling, though it was unclear if and when the White House would put it into effect.

Platforming Maga media

The White House took over deciding which outlets are allowed to take part in the press pool, a group that acts as the eyes and ears of the media covering the president up close, and included more fringe outlets. Rightwing journalists also became more prominent at press briefings.

Trump increasingly relies on executive orders

Trump has signed 141 executive orders in his first 100 days, including 36 in his first week in office. His use of the presidential pen is unprecedented in modern US history. Below are the number of executive orders presidents signed in their first 100 days.

[...]

‘Deep state’ purge

The reinstated “Schedule F” executive order has stripped tens of thousands of federal employees of civil service protections, allowing the administration to fire career officials deemed disloyal.

Pro-Palestinian targets

A week after the Columbia graduate and green card holder Mahmoud Khalil was detained in March, Trump signed an order called “Securing American Values” to target visa holders who have participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The order directs immigration agencies to authorize visa revocations of demonstrators linked to organizations accused of hate speech, and detain and expedite deportations for those involved in activity the administration deems antisemitic.

[...]

Alien Enemies Act

The Trump administration used an 18th-century wartime law to deport scores of Venezuelans to El Salvador, where they are being held in a draconian mega-prison known as Cecot. Trump’s use of the law faces legal challenges. Onboard one of the deportation flights was a Maryland father with protected legal status mistakenly deported in what the administration called an “administrative error”. The supreme court has ordered the US to “facilitate” his return.

Free speech crackdown

In an extraordinary crackdown on free speech, the Trump administration has tracked down and detained international students involved in pro-Palestinian protests, among them Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate and lawful permanent resident. [...]

Protesters take to the streets

After a slower start than Trump’s first term, protests have erupted across the country, including in small towns in Republican areas, standing up against his overreach. Established groups have joined together with a decentralized protest movement around broad messages against oligarchy and dismantling democracy.

The first 100 days of the Orange Satan’s 2nd term has been nothing short of a calamity and a shitshow. Thankfully, certain Americans are fed up with crap and protesting the Evil 47 Regime bravely.

See Also:

HuffPost: Trump’s Horrific First 100 Days

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

It’s not the hypocrisy that bothers me; it’s the stupidity. We’re all shocked — shocked! — that President Trump and his team don’t actually care about protecting classified information or federal record retention laws. But we knew that already. What’s much worse is that top Trump administration officials put our troops in jeopardy by sharing military plans on a commercial messaging app and unwittingly invited a journalist into the chat. That’s dangerous. And it’s just dumb.

This is the latest in a string of self-inflicted wounds by the new administration that are squandering America’s strength and threatening our national security. Firing hundreds of federal workers charged with protecting our nation’s nuclear weapons is also dumb. So is shutting down efforts to fight pandemics just as a deadly Ebola outbreak is spreading in Africa. It makes no sense to purge talented generals, diplomats and spies at a time when rivals like China and Russia are trying to expand their global reach.

In a dangerous and complex world, it’s not enough to be strong. You must also be smart. As secretary of state during the Obama administration, I argued for smart power, integrating the hard power of our military with the soft power of our diplomacy, development assistance, economic might and cultural influence. None of those tools can do the job alone. Together, they make America a superpower. The Trump approach is dumb power. Instead of a strong America using all our strengths to lead the world and confront our adversaries, Mr. Trump’s America will be increasingly blind and blundering, feeble and friendless.

Let’s start with the military, because that’s what he claims to care about. Don’t let the swagger fool you. Mr. Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (of group chat fame) are apparently more focused on performative fights over wokeness than preparing for real fights with America’s adversaries. Does anyone really think deleting tributes to the Tuskegee Airmen makes us more safe? The Trump Pentagon purged images of the plane that dropped the atomic bomb that ended World War II because its name is the Enola Gay. Dumb.

Instead of working with Congress to modernize the military’s budget to reflect changing threats, the president is firing top generals without credible justification. Five former secretaries of defense, Republicans and Democrats, rightly warned that this would “undermine our all-volunteer force and weaken our national security.” Mass layoffs are also hitting the intelligence agencies. As one former senior spy put it, “We’re shooting ourselves in the head, not the foot.” Not smart.

If they’re this reckless with America’s hard power, it’s no surprise that they’re shredding our soft power. As a former secretary of state, I am particularly alarmed by the administration’s plan to close embassies and consulates, fire diplomats and destroy the U.S. Agency for International Development. Let me explain why this matters, because it’s less widely understood than the importance of tanks and fighter jets.

I visited 112 countries and traveled nearly one million miles as America’s top diplomat, and I have seen how valuable it is for our country to be represented on the ground in far-flung places. The U.S. military has long understood that our forces must be forward deployed in order to project American power and respond quickly to crises. The same is true of our diplomats. Our embassies are our eyes and ears informing policy decisions back home. They are launchpads for operations that keep us safe and prosperous, from training foreign counterterrorism forces to helping U.S. companies enter new markets.

China understands the value of forward-deployed diplomacy, which is why it has opened new embassies and consulates around the world and now has more than the United States. The Trump administration’s retreat would leave the field open for Beijing to spread its influence uncontested.

Diplomats win America friends so we don’t have to go it alone in a competitive world. That’s how my colleagues and I were able to rally the United Nations to impose crippling sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program and ultimately force Tehran to stop its progress toward a bomb — something Mr. Trump’s bluster has failed to do. (He actually defunded inspectors keeping an eye on Iranian research sites. Dumb.)

Diplomacy is cost-effective, especially compared with military action. Preventing wars is cheaper than fighting them. Mr. Trump’s own former secretary of defense Jim Mattis, a retired Marine Corps four-star general, told Congress, “If you don’t fund the State Department fully, then I need to buy more ammunition.”

Our development assistance has always been a small portion of the federal budget, but it also has an outsize impact on international stability, especially paired with effective diplomacy. When American aid dollars help stop a famine or an outbreak, when we respond to a natural disaster or open schools, we win hearts and minds that might otherwise go to terrorists or rivals like China. We reduce the flow of migrants and refugees. We strengthen friendly governments that might otherwise collapse.

I don’t want to pretend that any of this is easy or that American foreign policy hasn’t been plagued by mistakes. Leadership is hard. But our best chance to get it right and to keep our country safe is to strengthen our government, not weaken it. We should invest in the patriots who serve our nation, not insult them.

Smart reforms could make federal agencies, including the State Department and U.S.A.I.D., more efficient and effective. During the Clinton administration, my husband’s Reinventing Government initiative, led by Vice President Al Gore, worked with Congress to thoughtfully streamline bureaucracy, modernize the work force and save billions of dollars. In many ways it was the opposite of the Trump administration’s slash-and-burn approach. Today they are not reinventing government; they’re wrecking it.

All of this is both dumb and dangerous. And I haven’t even gotten to the damage Mr. Trump is doing by cozying up to dictators like Russia’s Vladimir Putin, blowing up our alliances — force multipliers that extend our reach and share our burdens — and trashing our moral influence by undermining the rule of law at home. Or how he’s tanking our economy and blowing up our national debt. Propagandists in Beijing and Moscow know we are in a global debate about competing systems of governance. People and leaders around the world are watching to see if democracy can still deliver peace and prosperity or even function. If America is ruled like a banana republic, with flagrant corruption and a leader who puts himself above the law, we lose that argument. We also lose the qualities that have made America exceptional and indispensable.

If there’s a grand strategy at work here, I don’t know what it is. Maybe Mr. Trump wants to return to 19th-century spheres of influence. Maybe he’s just driven by personal grudges and is in way over his head. As a businessman, he bankrupted his Atlantic City casinos. Now he’s gambling with the national security of the United States. If this continues, a group chat foul will be the least of our concerns, and all the fist and flag emojis in the world won’t save us.

Hillary Clinton is a former secretary of state and U.S. senator and was the Democratic Party’s nominee for president in 2016.

https://www.nytimes.com/.../trump-hegseth-signal-chat...

[beardedmrbean]

There has been a change in air transport, with unfortunate consequences for both safety and passenger comfort, writes Ilta-Sanomat.

"Disruptive behaviour has increased significantly since the years of the coronavirus pandemic. The phenomenon is global, not just Finnish," says Jari Pöntinen, Director of Aviation at the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom.

The rise in the phenomenon has not been quite as alarming in Finland as in the rest of Europe, but it is still clear trend. In 2020, 93 cases were reported in Finland, compared to 267 last year.

Several aviation industry stakeholders, including the police, border guard, customs and airlines have issued a joint statement on prevention measures which emphasises the reduction of incidents through communication with passengers, staff training and cooperation within the aviation community.

Inspector Miika Laine of the Eastern Uusimaa Police Department says that people are also loitering at airports without any intention to travel.

Various types of intoxicants are part of the problem both at airports and on planes. In Finland, alcohol is the most common contributing factor.

In addition to calming individuals causing a disruption, police measures can include removal from the scene, fines, criminal charges and arrests.

"Inappropriate behaviour includes swearing, insults and shouting. Drinking from your own bottle has become very common," Finnair's director of cabin safety, Ida Flykt, told Ilta-Sanomat.

Gambling law proposal rejected

Parliament's Social Affairs and Health Committee on Wednesday rejected a government proposal that would open gambling in Finland to competition from the beginning of next year.

Helsingin Sanomat reports that a majority of MPs on the committee believe that the government's proposal would increase the harm caused by gambling and responded to the proposal with a call to raise the age limit for all types of gambling to 20 years.

The Committee also stressed that gambling is not a normal consumer product, but a highly harmful and seriously addictive product, saying that the prevention and reduction of gambling-related harm should be the main objective of any new legislation.

Meanwhile, Iltalehti reports that the National Police Board has threatened to slap a 33,000-euro fine on a Finnish social media influencer for promoting commercial online gambling sites.

The influencer had shared links to gambling sites on Twitch and YouTube and broadcast live gambling on Twitch.

In late March, the Helsinki Administrative Court dismissed an appeal by the influencer against the ban on these promotional activities.

By law, the gaming operator Veikkaus has exclusive rights to organise gambling in mainland Finland.

According to the police, the marketing was targeted at Finland and Finns and was intended to promote gambling in Finland. Police welcome the court ruling, saying that gambling marketing is unequivocally prohibited in mainland Finland.

Changes in postal services

Major changes are coming to postal service deliveries in several Finnish cities.

Verkkouutiset writes that the national postal service, Posti, plans to end daily deliveries and introduce a new delivery model where mail will be delivered every two or three days. Delivery days will alternate, meaning that in practice, mail will be delivered twice one week and three times the next week. In addition, mail will increasingly be delivered in the mornings at the same time as newspapers.

The change will come into force in the Helsinki on 2 June. Leaflets announcing delivery changes have been distributed in Helsinki, Espoo, Forssa, Jyväskylä, Kuopio and Pori.

In addition to the distribution changes, Posti has announced that it will increase the prices of stamps and parcel charges.

End of term gifts

Many parents are currently thinking about how to show appreciation to teachers at schools and kindergartens as the end of the school year fast approaches.

One popular option, notes Uutissuomalainen is a gift card.

However, USU points out that giving money and gift vouchers to municipal officials, including teachers, is prohibited. In some cases, it can be interpreted as a bribe.

Municipal officials, employees and trustees are prohibited by law from asking for or receiving bribes. It is also a criminal offence to give a bribe to a public official. The law does not define what constitutes an appropriate gift in terms of quality and value and when it is an inappropriate bribe. The purpose of the rules is to safeguard confidence in the impartiality of public authorities.

In its guidance on this issue, the Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities does not take a position on whether a gift voucher is an appropriate gift for teachers, or not.

According to Kirsi Lamberg, a lawyer at the association, what kind of gift can be given to or accepted by an official is a case-by-case consideration.

"It is ultimately up to the recipient to decide whether the gift can be accepted in good faith," says Lamberg.

Nina Lahtinen, Head of Education Policy at the OAJ, the professional organisation for teachers, points out that there is a long tradition in the education sector of remembering teachers at the end of the academic year and that this is not intended as a bribe.

The OAJ has no official position on gift cards. According to Lahtinen, however, open cash vouchers should not be given, but vouchers for a specific item or service can be given if the value is reasonable.

Heidi Ruonala, a legal expert at the Finnish National Agency for Education, takes the same approach.

"Small and low-value mementos such as a candle, chocolate or a flower cannot be interpreted as a bribe," she assured Uutissuomalainen.

[reading-writing-revolution]

The List -- Fraud, Waste and Abuse Edition

I asked ChatGPT to look at one of the earlier lists of authoritarian actions the Trump Regime is taking and categorize them according to the labels "fraud, waste and abuse". The goal was to have AI categorize and list which action represented fraud (a lie or cheat of the American people), waste (an action that was wasteful of resources) or abuse (an action that was deliberately abusive in nature against the American people), and here's the list: The original list can be found here: https://theweeklylistreturns.substack.com/p/week-17-the-return

Here’s a recategorization of the entries based on Fraud, Waste, and Abuse:

FRAUD (Cheating the American People)

Media and Information Manipulation

WAPO restricting opinion pieces to only pro-libertarian, pro-free-market views.

White House barring major media outlets while allowing only conservative news sources.

Voice of America journalists facing HR investigations for critical reporting on Trump.

AI-generated video depicting "TRUMP GAZA" misrepresenting geopolitical reality.

Corruption and Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Mehmet Oz retaining millions in investments despite nomination to oversee Medicare/Medicaid.

Lynn Dekleva’s appointment to EPA despite prior lobbying for chemical industries.

Capital One, Rocket Mortgage, and other corporations escaping consumer protection lawsuits under Trump’s CFPB.

Zelle network operators, including major banks, escaping fraud investigations due to CFPB case dismissals.

Musk inserting DOGE personnel into FAA while SpaceX stands to win a major $2.4 billion contract.

Musk influencing NASA operations and receiving private access to internal agency discussions.

Election and Legal Manipulation

DOJ reviewing conviction of Tina Peters, a convicted election conspiracist.

Harmeet Dhillon and John Sauer suggesting some court orders can be ignored.

Demotion of prosecutors overseeing Capitol insurrection cases.

Trump pardoning January 6 defendants and shutting down investigations into domestic extremism.

House Republicans attempting to extend Trump’s presidency beyond two terms.

Trump proposing national crypto reserve, raising conflict-of-interest concerns.

Trump's DOJ delaying foreign bribery cases under the pretext of reassessing corruption laws.

WASTE (Destroying Essential Programs and Services)

Federal Budget and Economic Policy

Mass layoffs across federal agencies, including 10,000 EPA staff and nearly all 1,700 CFPB employees.

Foreign aid freeze cutting off health and disaster relief funding worldwide.

Termination of USAID programs combating polio, HIV, and malaria.

Attempt to defund universities over "illegal protests," violating the First Amendment.

Pausing military aid to Ukraine despite ongoing war.

Stock market crashes due to abrupt tariff announcements, harming U.S. economy.

Trump tariffs against Canada, Mexico, and China escalating trade wars.

Overhaul of rural broadband program to favor Starlink, awarding billions to Musk.

Musk manipulating air safety concerns to justify Starlink involvement in FAA.

Mismanagement of Agencies

Abandoning lawsuits against chemical companies accused of releasing carcinogens.

Closing civil rights and anti-discrimination enforcement offices under DOGE.

Halting State Department’s global air quality monitoring program after a decade.

Ending federal policies allowing language assistance for non-English speakers.

GOP’s "big beautiful bill" cutting key programs like Medicaid and food assistance.

Environmental and Public Infrastructure Neglect

Dismantling of NOAA, jeopardizing weather forecasting and climate research.

Closing of National Park Service offices, leading to nationwide protests.

Cuts to FEMA disaster relief workforce weeks before hurricane season.

Ending federal enforcement of clean air and water regulations.

ABUSE (Harming or Causing Distress to Americans)

Targeting Vulnerable Populations

Trump regime removing all transgender troops unless granted a waiver.

Federal judge blocking attempts to withhold hospital funding for trans youth.

Ending hiring discrimination lawsuits, enabling racial bias in policing and fire departments.

ICE attempting to obtain home addresses of 700,000 undocumented immigrants.

DOGE seeking IRS tax records to target recipients of government benefits.

Undermining Public Safety

Trump-appointed officials ordering mass layoffs of air traffic controllers.

Musk soliciting retired air traffic controllers due to FAA staffing crisis.

Halting cyber defense operations against Russia, putting national security at risk.

Removing high-ranking Black military officials from leadership roles.

Attempt to rename Fort Moore to honor a Confederate general.

Authoritarian and Anti-Democratic Actions

White House pressuring USAID to cover up impacts of foreign aid freeze.

Targeting federal judges who oppose Trump’s agenda.

Seizing and transporting classified document boxes on Air Force One.

House Republicans introducing bills to rename federal buildings after Trump.

Human Rights and Foreign Policy Failures

Zelensky humiliated at the White House, leading to international fallout.

Abandoning U.S. military aid and intelligence support for Ukraine.

Praising Putin while criticizing NATO allies.

Cutting U.S. foreign aid while China, Russia, and Iran expand influence.

GOP officials pressuring Zelensky to "apologize" to Trump.

Arrest and deportation threats increasing for immigrants under ICE expansion.

Conclusion

Fraud: Policies that deceive the public or enable corruption.

Waste: Reckless destruction of necessary government functions and resources.

Abuse: Policies designed to cause harm, distress, or fear to specific groups or the general public.

This categorization highlights how many of these actions fit into a broader pattern of corruption, negligence, and authoritarian behavior.

[mariacallous]

The week before President Donald Trump unveiled bruising new tariffs that sent the stock market plummeting, a key official in the agency that shapes his administration’s trade policy sold off as much as $30,000 of stock.

Two days before that so-called “Liberation Day” announcement on April 2, a State Department official sold as much as $50,000 in stock, then bought a similar investment as prices fell.

And just before Trump made another significant tariff announcement, a White House lawyer sold shares in nine companies, records show.

More than a dozen high-ranking executive branch officials and congressional aides have made well-timed trades since Trump took office in January, most of them selling stock before the market plunged amid fears that Trump’s tariffs would set off a global trade war, according to a ProPublica review of disclosures across the government.

All of the trades came shortly before a significant government announcement or development that could influence stock prices. Some who sold individual stocks or broader market funds used their earnings to buy investments that are generally less risky, such as bonds or treasuries. Others appear to have kept their money in cash. In one case unrelated to tariffs, records show that a congressional aide bought stock in two mining companies shortly before a key Senate committee approved a bill written by his boss that would help the firms.

Using nonpublic information learned at work to trade securities could violate the law. But even if such actions aren’t influenced by insider knowledge, ethics experts warn that trading stock while the federal government’s actions move markets can create the appearance of impropriety. The recent trades by government officials, they said, underscore that there should be tighter rules on how, or if, federal employees can trade securities.

[mahamid110]

🤖 AI Influencer 24/7 Review: Launch Your Own Virtual Superstar That Sells, Engages & Grows Your Brand — All On Autopilot! 💸🌍📲

What if you could launch a fully-branded AI influencer that creates content, talks to your audience, and promotes your offers — on every platform, in any language, with zero effort on your part?

Well, now you can.

Introducing the AI Influencer 24/7 System — a powerful, one-click solution that lets you build and deploy your very own digital influencer that works around the clock, creating viral posts, talking like a human, and even selling products for you.

CLICK HERE TO GET INSTANT ACCESS NOW >>

🛠️ Key Features:

✅ One-Click AI Influencer Deployment 🧠 Launch your influencer in minutes — with custom branding, niche focus, and voice options.

✅ Omni-Platform Content Posting 📱 Your AI influencer will automatically create and post content to TikTok, YouTube Shorts, Reels, Twitter, and more.

✅ Real-Time Audience Engagement 💬 AI-powered chat interaction mimics real conversations, helping you engage, build trust, and convert followers.

✅ Multilingual Support 🌐 Reach a global audience by creating and responding in any language — automatically.

✅ Daily Content Creation & Promotion 🗓️ Your influencer will generate daily content AND promote affiliate offers, services, or your own products.

✅ Fully Branded with Your Voice or Persona 🧑🎤 Customize look, tone, and messaging to match your brand — or create a whole new personality.

✅ No Video/Design/Marketing Skills Needed 🙌 Perfect for beginners. All the tech and creative work is handled for you.

✅ Agency Mode 💼 Create and manage multiple AI influencers for clients — a done-for-you social media service without hiring talent.

💸 Real Results:

Users are seeing $200–$300+/day from affiliate sales, product promos, and client packages — all powered by their AI influencers doing the heavy lifting 24/7.

CLICK HERE TO GET INSTANT ACCESS NOW >>

✅ Pros:

100% beginner-friendly

Works on autopilot, even while you sleep

No need to show your face or be on camera

Monetize in multiple niches (fitness, finance, fashion, crypto, etc.)

Agencies can charge monthly for influencer campaigns

Great for affiliate marketing, ecommerce, personal brands

❌ Cons:

Needs proper setup and niche targeting to perform best

Some platforms may require manual approval for bots

AI engagement, while good, might not always pass as human in complex conversations

CLICK HERE TO GET INSTANT ACCESS NOW >>

💵 Pricing & OTOs (One-Time Offers):

Front-End App: $37 One-Time

OTO 1 – Pro Edition: $67 (Unlock advanced AI personalities & more content slots)

OTO 2 – Agency License: $97 (Manage for clients, add branding & team features)

OTO 3 – DFY Influencer Templates: $47 (Get plug-n-play niches ready to launch)

OTO 4 – Reseller Rights: $197 (Sell the software as your own)

🎁 Exclusive Bonuses (When You Grab It Today):

🎁 Viral Hooks & CTA Swipe File 🎁 100 Influencer Video Prompts for Any Niche 🎁 Step-by-Step AI Influencer Monetization Blueprint 🎁 Bonus Training: $1K/Week with AI Personal Brands

CLICK HERE TO GET INSTANT ACCESS NOW >>

🎯 Who Is This For?

Affiliate marketers

Freelancers & agencies

Ecommerce store owners

Social media beginners

Coaches, consultants & solopreneurs

Anyone who wants influencer-style results without being on camera

🔥 Final Verdict:

This AI Influencer 24/7 System is a total game-changer. Whether you're camera-shy, time-strapped, or just looking to automate your content game, this tool delivers massive value. With zero tech hassle, full branding control, and monetization built in, it's like hiring a full-time content creator, marketer, and spokesperson — all in one.

If you want to sell more, grow faster, and do it all on autopilot... 👉 This is the tool to watch.

CLICK HERE TO GET INSTANT ACCESS NOW >>