#fr drama

[aempest-fr]

Sucks that thigh highs are associated with being inherently sexual like…they’re socks. Staff considering putting them on a hatchling to be sexual is kinda sus 🤨📸

[punkrising]

Also, some of the complaints about the new lore direction have made me realize some players have a really weird and limited view of what constitutes a person. 

Saying that dragons are animals, so it’s not one group of people enacting violence against another group and therefore doesn’t have real life parallels... That argument pretty much falls apart when you consider that fr dragon are canonically sentient, emotional, and self aware. They build and invent things things, form complex societies and hierarchies, have different cultures... You know, all the things that people do.

The dragons are a fantasy race of people, To say that they’re not people because they’re not human opens up a lot of weird philosophical questions... And it’s just a crappy excuse to defend lore that reflects real life atrocities. 

[kaguraspetsims]

the main tag is angry

[redfloonrising]

wild to think I've spent at least $2k on skins/accents (definitely more) primarily bc of getting mass pings from gasp. I don't go looking through the forums for accent shops bc it's a lot to wade through trying to find things that fit my aesthetics. it's not like there's a tagging system for thread contents, dragon gender/breed, styles, colors, or any sort of filtering that would make things easier to search on the forums. I can't sign up for a ping list I don't know exists, can't preorder or purchase a skin I don't know about 😓

obviously I like the new ping lists for single person threads, it makes sense for some things but less so for others since dom projects are run co-op with a myriad of users, and so many people utilize mass ping lists with filters for g1s, oldies, skins/accents, etc.

[jennycatmystique-fr]

I know it’s not explicitly the focus of this post so I’m sorry for exploding here but I just can’t get over the use of Lolita as an example of “adultifying” in their blurb. Like. It’s so upsetting. If the focus is on Lolita fashion, as I’m assuming it is because I have no idea how they would be specifying the book in this case, they are just wholly showing how little research they do before making changes to the site.

I’m not Japanese so it’s not really exactly my place to say it; but as a Lolita fashion fan for years that has continued to see this battle happen over and OVER, I think it just qualifies as racist at this point to make such broad generalizations about entire subcultures that you aren’t familiar with. Lolita fashion, in one form or another (as it is a fashion style it’s constantly evolving and branching into other subcategories), has existed since the late 1970s! There’s almost 50 years of history there, and like 99% of it has NOTHING to do with objectifying or adultifying someone! People just keep parroting that it’s something inherently sexual when it’s not! Many Lolita circles are very strict on not even allowing any sexually explicit content or dress because that is inherently against the entire point of the subculture which is Victorian dress and baby doll-inspired clothing. There are groups and subcultures that view it sexually, but that can be said about literally anything at this point. That cannot be a valid reason for blanket banning the ENTIRE group.

Also the obsession with “certain clothing = inherently sexual no nuance” icks me out to a point too. Obviously there are reasonable limits because the art is meant to imply a baby dragon, regardless of the whole debacle with the perma baby scroll thing. But still.

the scar rule for hatchling skins is absolutely bullshit bordering on pure ableism, but I'm really trying to wrap my head around "Lolita-inspired" because I straight up cannot tell if they mean the book (in which case they really could have worded this better) or the fashion (in which case they either clearly don't know what lolita fashion is or they're strictly talking about the more "sexualized" subcultures which again really could have been worded better lol!! like why even use lolita as an example in the first place then!)

site rules in general but especially skin rules tend to be wayyy too broad and unclear because staff is overly cautious about Everything. and talking about skins specifically, they should really be evaluated on a case-by-case basis instead of. whatever this is. because yeah certain clothes can look too sexual but I would think that the skin mods are capable of evaluating that on their own? did we really need the incredibly unclear wording of "Designs should not adultify the hatchling"? like the wording here is so broad that you could easily make a case for hatchling skins featuring little baby business suits also being against the rules. really hope the clarifications they said they're writing up will like. actually clarify things.

but I do want to push back against the people who are saying that perma-baby dragons are "canonically an adult in a child's body" because that's absolutely not true and we need to differentiate between gameplay mechanics and canonical lore because what the fuck is the auction house then? if you use a scroll of maturity on a day-old hatchling are they a child in an adult's body until they turn 5? if you have a perma-baby that is an adult in a child's body/something similar in your lore that's totally fine! but let's not pretend that's true site-wide because the scroll of eternal youth + its associated flavor text never say that and there's no official lore that says it either!! a lot of people use scrolls of eternal youth to keep their child ocs in their hatchling pose and that is an equally valid interpretation of youth scrolls.

[seikiro]

Affair The Series รักเล่นกล - Episode 6 (top pleng)

[gunsatthaphan]

the heart killers - coming november 20th

[drop-dead-dino]

I’m totally normal about these two totally normal dudes :) .

I don’t usually read fics, specially AU related ones, but this one GOT me, holy cow. Check it out if you fancy that sort of thing! 

Love, Death, and Rollerskates by @spadillelicious !

[dramashii]

Go on ahead. I'll definitely be behind you this time, so you don't have to look back.

LOVE NEXT DOOR (2024)

[edwardsdeathcabcd]

i've said it before but it will forever and always make me insane that jacob's ending is to join the cullens for the sake of bella not having to give anything up. they find out jake will be immortal & tied to renesmee forever, so bella gets to smile & say "my family is finally complete! ^-^" but jake already HAS a family. he has a father and 2 sisters. quil, embry, seth and sam are like his brothers. jacob and leah were planning to run away together. he's always been welcome in emily's home, sue has been a family friend since before his birth. bella abandons her mortality by choice because she feels no connection to the people around her, but jacob has really strong bonds. it's clear that every character we meet in la push is like family to him, he's an active member of the community. jake would've graduated high school and been a mechanic, would've grown into a young man. a good friend, a fun uncle, a present son. he's set up to have such a rich life. and he's just magically compelled to give that up. beyond his control, he loses sight of everything, because his high school crush's baby is now the singular most important thing to him. he's perpetually 18 with his perpetually 18 year old girlfriend, running around vancouver or alaska or wherever with the girl who friendzoned him at 16 & her in-laws (who were antagonistic to him for months). and i'm just supposed to say omg yay now he doesn't have to let go of bella! everyone is happy! it's complete madness

[swedenis-h]

When did it happen?

[k-wame]

JACOB ELORDI He Went That Way (2023) dir. Jeffrey Darling

[conejita-canelita]

Girl- “my hyper-independence born as a survival technique in my dysfunctional home self-sabotages the good in my life because I’m always waiting for the other shoe to drop”- failure , and her boy -“I seek to please people because it distracts me from my own grief and keeps me away from an identity crisis, resulting in placing unfair expectations on what my loved ones can do towards my purpose when the only one who can fill that void is me”-loser come together to create the most beautifully breathtaking mess of conflict you’ve ever seen that is somehow chalked up to a man’s smut journals and his wife’s 1800s burn book.

[valverii]

you’re just a stranger i know everything about

> no color ver. below :]

[khaopybara]

❝You were calling me Wa back in the gym. Now that we're on the same boat, can we talk a little more intimately? We'll call it as a thank you to me.❞

CHRISTINE GULASATREE as FOUR SIMESA and MAE METHAKARN as JATTAWA episode 3 of REVERSE 4 YOU

[the-mother-of-lions]

look at you having fun. you're a totally different person from the bored guy i used to pass to. jerk. you're not mine anymore, are you? what i want is right here. no. its nowhere but here. if my dreams are going to shatter miserably and fade away... i'll throw it all away and become an idiot too. just like you're changing at blue lock, i'll change into who ever i want. i'll become someone you can't help but chase after. i'll get what i want at all costs.