#femistism
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
YES. IF YOU WANT TO FIGHT FOR SOMETHING MAKE SURE ALL BENEFIT FROM IT. THE WORLD DOESN'T REVOLVE AROUND YOU.
I'm sorry to see that some (feminist) people still believe that Amber was sexually assaulted by Johnny. If feminism wants gender equality, why are there people who do not want to support men's rights? It's bewildering.
Emma Watson once said: “For the record, feminism by definition is the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. It is the theory of political, economic and social equality of the sexes”. We need more people who support women and men's rights because both can be victims.
#feminism#true feminism#femist#women's rights#men's rights#johnny depp#amber heard#justice for johnny depp#bitter truths that you can't avoid#true equality
77 notes
·
View notes
Note
Noticed something about zutarians: for people who claim to be "THE femist ship" they spend too much time praising Zuko for doing chores, being empathetic, supporting women and other stuff he didn't really do in canon all that much.
Like, feminists would consider these a basic level that any normal person, man or woman, should do for their own's sake without any praise. Oohing and aahing "look, he spends time with his own child!", "oh, you washed the dishes, my hero!", "where would I have been if you didn't do the laundry, my knight in shining armor, you really are a savior!" is... very sexist, actually! And zutarians do just that. It’s not enough for them to write him doing chores, they have to emphasize this, compare him to Aang/Sokka/anyone else who of course doesn’t do chores (because no one except Katara and Zuko ever does anything chorelike in these fics it seems), or just outright praise him for that.
Of course, zutara never was a feminist ship, so my observation doesn't add anything new. I understand that zutara kinda fits "female gaze" or whatever, though, it's a women's dream about a perfect partner, which is totally fine by itself – it just has nothing to do with Zuko (and, dare I say, Katara – I doubt she would be so ecstatic about a guy doing "women's chores", she is used to dividing the work around camp and takes it for granted). And that's why I cannot read even relatively harmless zutara fluff – it very often is very focused on this exact subject. I like Zuko for who he is and the truth is 1) he's flawed even after his redemption and 2) a huge part of how he sees himself is his prince title. Nothing of it matches zutara fantasy of a male housewife, so they have a whole other character named Zuko to fit into their imagination land, and I just have no interest in that.
I'm still impressed by that one fic (not in English) where Fantara was 100% sure that Fanfic-Firelord-Zuko will never ever "force any hapless woman" to take care of his newborn daughter (as opposed to her awful, awful husband, Fanfic-Aang who can't even feed his son, who's still eating only breast milk, for several days while Fantara decided to be away). Sure, girl, he's a fucking ruler, he has a whole country to think about, tons of very important shit to do every single day, a full palace of servants, of course he will always personally change diapers, no doubt. I bet he'll even do all the breastfeeding by himself, since his wife died at childbirth and forcing other women is out of the question.
I'm bitter now, and maybe taking it too far but what if – just "what if" – there are very few people who actually ship Katara and Zuko? Because it seems that most content creators in zutara fandom actually ship their two OCs who are very loosely based on these two characters (but don't I dare tell it to their faces, haha, they are under impression that their image of Zuko and Katara is somehow the only correct one).
Just one little disagreement: Zutara doesn't fit the Female Gaze because there's no such thing in the first place. There's not a single trope, way to direct a scene, or romance formula that universally appeals to women, and the same thing can appeal to different women for radically different reasons.
"Male Gaze" and "Female Gaze" were supposed to be a way to point out sexism (and sometimes straight up abuse) in film-making, but it honest God became some bullshit gender-essentialism nonsense REALLY fast. We gotta let that "That is for boys, this is for girls" mentality die.
Aang does chores with Katara. That is completely irrelevant to me shipping Kataang. Aang is not sexist. That doesn't even reach my top 50 reasons to love him as a character. Aang does a lot of things that don't match the idea I was raised to have of a "manly man" and I could not give less of fuck about it. It doesn't bother me, but doesn't particularly appeal to me either.
But for lots of people that is HUGE and some of the main reasons why they love his character and his romance with Katara. And notice I said people, not women.
I like plenty of enemies-to-lovers ships - I don't relate to a single meta/analysis I've ever seen of "Why women like bad boys/enemies to lovers/redeemed villains so much." It all rang hollow to me. But to plenty of women it hits the nail right on the head.
Hell, 50 Shades of Grey is a "romance/erotica" full of accidental misogyny, abuse-apologism, and slut-shaming yet the fanbase is 90% women from all kinds of demographics, and the main thing they praise about these goddamn books/movies is that it did NOT make them feel like they should be ashamed of wanting to have kinky sex with a hot guy.
The Female Gaze isn't real.
38 notes
·
View notes
Text

Femist icon
107 notes
·
View notes
Text
lmfao femist king (oder so)
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Me:"My deed;is life done." (I forgot the fucking line,btw this Othello from the a short Shakespear play.I played Iago)
Teacher:"No,why did you went to to a British accent.Say it in your normal voice."
Me:"That was a BRITSH VOIC- PFT- HOW??-"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Me:"Oh-tello."
Teacher:"Othello."
Me:"UGH- uh- Otheo."
..............................................................................................................................
Shiver me body of water:"Femist Queen role."
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Woman r telling me to listen to electronic slop music by Girl Hitler instead of stewing around in my perfect comfy zone (exclusively listen to Dragonforce) becos i have to be more femist in my action but to be honest all women are 1000 percent the focus of their 2017 song WAR!
3 notes
·
View notes
Note
i want to make sure you know that radfem is based in transphobia against trans women and trans people in general in case you didn’t know that. if you do know that please block me as i’m a trans man and i don’t want transphobes following me :)
In a few words, it is possible to refute this misinformation spread in the Radfem environment.
With small topics we can start with:
What is radfem or what it means? Radical feminism is a perspective within feminism that proposes a radical reordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts.
This current emerged between the 60s and 70s and argues that the root — where the word radical comes from — of all oppression is patriarchy.
Radfem ITSELF is not transphobic and DOES NOT HAVE transphobic roots, but the women within it have distorted its meaning so much that we ended up being mistaken for femists.
As proof we have the radical lesbofeminist movement itself, Lavender Menace.
In 1970, Lavender Menace, later Radicalesbians, organized the Lavender Menace zap of the Second Congress to Unite Women. Martha Shelley played an instrumental role in the zap itself, and some have claimed she assisted in the writing of the Radicalesbians manifesto, "The Woman-Identified Woman", which introduced "women-identified" and "male-identified" terminology to the lesbian feminist discourse community.
Feminism is a movement that fights for social equality and rights for women and seeks to combat the social model based on patriarchy and abuse and violence against women. At no point do movements revolve around social genders or biological sexes, this is not the objective of feminism (in general)!
Any ideology that seeks to superiorize female biological SEX is no longer feminism, we want equality and not superiority.
Radfem is not against trans people, the femists who hide here are.
- ♨️
#radical feminism#radical feminist community#para safe#paraphile community#pro radqueer#pro transx#transid#radqueers please interact#radqueer safe#rq 🍓🌈
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
March 2023 Reads
The Neighbor Favor - Kristina Forest
The Love Wager - Lynn Painter
Witcha Gonna Do? - Avery Flynn
A Witch’s Guide to Fake Dating a Demon - Sarah Hawley
The Librarian of Crooked Lane - C.J. Archer
The Secret Lives of Country Gentlemen - K.J. Charles
Of Manners and Murder - Anastasia Hastings
To Say Nothing of the Dog - Connie Willis
The Lives of Christopher Chant - Diana Wynne Jones
Royal Blood - Aimee Carter
Missing Clarissa - Ripley Jones
Kill Joy - Holly Jackson
Home Field Advantage - Dahlia Adler
Begin Again - Emma Lord
Free Radicals - Lila Riesen
The Headmaster’s List - Melissa de la Cruz
The Magic Fish - Trung Le Nguyen
She-Hulk, Vol 1: Jen, Again: Rainbow Rowell
Enchantment - Katherine May
What Looks Like Bravery - Laurel Braitman
Forager - Michelle Dowd
Why Has Nobody Told Me This Before? - Julie Smith
Glow in the F*cking Dark - Tara Schuster
Dear Dolly - Dolly Alderton
We Should Not Be Friends - Will Schwalbe
It’s OK to Be Angry About Capitalism - Bernie Sanders
Con/Artist - Tony Tetro
The Polyvagal Theory - Stephen W. Porges
The Way Out - Alan Gordon, Alon Ziv
Financial Femist - Tori Dunlap
Peak Mind - Amish P. Jha
Sex Talks - Vanessa Marin
Come as You Are - Emily Nagasaki
What’s Eating Us - Cole Kazdin
Plant-Based on a Budget Quick & Easy - Toni Okamoto
Dinner in One - Melissa Clark
Bold = Highly Recommend Italics = Worth It Crossed out = Nope
Thoughts:
A really solid month, especially for non-fiction reads.
Goodreads Goal: 103/400
2017 Reads | 2018 Reads | 2019 Reads | 2020 Reads | 2021 Reads |
2022 Reads | 2023 Reads
50 notes
·
View notes
Text
Potato Tweet: Praise to Broey Deschanel for criticizing the “women monologue” from the Barbie movie. Yes, it is an important piece of the movie and yes, it has moved a lot of people to reflect upon women’s situation in a patriarchal society. BUT ALSO it is flat! It’s a distillate of a lot of pop femist slogans that create snaps. It’s good and it’s flat at the same time.
#unpopular opinion#barbie movie#barbie#broey deschanel#potato tweet#personal blog#penny for my thoughts#potatotweet#tweet#video essay#feeling cynical about Barbie
10 notes
·
View notes
Note
https://www.tumblr.com/sc0tters/746478581921857536/i-have-an-age-gap-fic-idea-that-i-usually-love
SID PLEASEEEEEEEEEE
I might give Matt the Hozier song one but you know the one olivia rodrigo unreleased song (where it is like I'm a femist obviously, but I wouldn't really mind him saving me?) maybe we give that age gap fic to Sid? Or maybe the other way around?
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
What are your pet peeves about female characters?
none women can do no wrong #yuri #femist #pridemonth
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
good grief this post is such a rorschach blot. people in the notes saying "this is why im a tradwife" and "this is why tradwives are stupid" and "this is why im a feminist" and "this is why femists are stupid." literally just confirming whatever they already believe.
a phrase that kinda bothers me when talking about women's historical roles in europe is "cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children." you hear it so often, those exact words in the same order even. and once you learn a little more you realize that the massive gaping hole in that list is fiberwork. im not an expert and have no hard numbers, but i wouldnt be surprised if fiberwork took up nearly as much time as the other three tasks combined, so it's not a trivial omission.
it's not a hot take to say that the mass amnesia about fiberwork is linked to the belittlement of women's work in geneal, but i do think there's a special kind of illusion that is cast by "cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children." you hear that and think "well i cook and clean and take care of children (or i know someone who does) and i have a sense of how much work that is" and you know of course that cooking and cleaning were more laborious before modern technology, but still, you have a ballpark estimate you think, when in fact you are drastically underestimating the work load.
i also think that this just micharacterizes the role of women's work in livelihoods? cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children are all sisyphean tasks that have to be repeated the next day. these are important, but not the whole picture. when we include all kinds of fiberwork—and other things, such as making candles or soap—women's work looks much more like manufacturing, a sphere we now associate more with men's work. i feel like women's connection to making and craftsmanship is often elided.
#i will probably mute the notes and forget about it#it got some book recs early on so something positive has come of it#and the bs is a relatively small proportion
29K notes
·
View notes
Text
'Good looking woman ...':;
A man complained by a man of social media against their employment station against his male colleagues. Until recently, the user described as a “slightly femist” until recently, they are expected to take more time without extra compensation. “I'm a 24-year-old boy, I'm slightly feminist (so up to this). But I entered the workplace, but I can see how men and women treats men. Statements of…
0 notes
Text
'Good looking woman ...':;
A man complained by a man of social media against their employment station against his male colleagues. Until recently, the user described as a “slightly femist” until recently, they are expected to take more time without extra compensation. “I'm a 24-year-old boy, I'm slightly feminist (so up to this). But I entered the workplace, but I can see how men and women treats men. Statements of…
0 notes
Note
I see Nexus and Starscream being the femist divas together.
YO SLAY QUEEN.
Why do you draw Starscream like he's a girl?
because he's a DIVA💜
he's a princess and a wife who happened to be a man <33
#transformers#tf#tf g1#starscream#ask#its just easier for me to stylize him this way :)#he also always serves💅💅#if theres a man i can feminize then i always take the opportunity#leddynettie au reblogs!#tsbs/tsams/laes mention#tsams nexus#tsbs nexus mention
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
( simay barlas , 26 , cis woman , she/her ) : ANNOUNCING !! ( lady mavi greyjoy ) of ( house greyjoy ) hailing from ( pyke ). they are known to be ( femistic , adaptable ) but also, ( distrustful , stubborn ) across the realm. there are faint whispers that they support ( house velaryon ) ( alongside ) their house. they are currently at court in ( king’s landing )
basics
full name : mavi badeem
nicknames : maves, mave
age : 26 (26 physically )
birthday/zodiac : august 19th / leo
gender/pronouns : cis female / she/her
sexual orientation : bisexual
house : greyjoy
family : adelia greyjoy, lady rhea greyjoy, lord daemon greyjoy, lady daeryssa greyjoy
languages : english, asl, velaryon, dothraki
personality
bad habits … . self-blaming, holing herself up from others
hobbies … . reckless enjoyment (sometimes), working
fears … . realizing her family might hate her for helping hel escape
alignment : chaotic good
behind the mask
face claim … . simay barlas
height … . 5'5"
hair color … . brown
eye color … . brown
scars … . one on her left shoulder that's still healing after secretly helping hel escape
about
somewhat like Arya - very tomboyish, knows how to use swords but is also somewhat like Sansa season 1 where she is looking for a husband eventually - if they can even handle her
is a secret traitor to the greyjoy family, she helped hel during her captivity and eventually helped her escape - which is why she's in king's landing, away from possible persecution from her family when they find out what she has done
is very neutral, despite acting like she's not she looks at both sides and tries her hardest to play devils advocate
that's all i have right now but i'll update it later on with more info!
0 notes