#fd: 13 reasons why

[eddysocs]

Harper Cassidy + Interior Design Board

Send 🏠 + an OC for a interior design board

Forever Tag: @arrthurpendragon, @baubeautyandthegeek, @atjsgf, @kmc1989, @curious-kittens-ocs, @fanficanatic-tw, @kissykissymouth

Harper Cassidy: @megandaisy9, @boobear729, @ghostsunderstoodmysoul, @freshmoneyalmondathlete

[creators-club]

Here is a tag list of every fandom, including original work, that is features in the Creators' Club:

fd: 13RW (13 Reasons Why)

fd: atla (Avatar the Last Airbender)

fd: beetlejuice

fd: boy meets world

fd: castlevania

fd: dc

fd: dying light

fd: extraction

fd: final fantasy

fd: found

fd: gta (grand theft auto)

fd: hunger games

fd: kung fu panda

fd: little hope

fd: last of us

fd: madagascar

fd: marvel

fd: naruto

fd: ncis

fd: one piece

fd: original world

fd: original writing (poems, etc)

fd: OUAT (Once Upon a Time)

fd: resident evil

fd: saints row

fd: silent hill

fd: sonic the hedgehog

fd: star wars

fd: supernatural

fd: teen wolf

fd: the talented mr. ripley

fd: vampire diaries

fd: white collar

fd: wrestling

[artleaguemdcnorth]

Critique/ Line Assignment 5/13/24

I will go over this selection of assignments on Weds.

Here is the information for now .

Those of you that need to make changes to your work or improve them can have additional time tomorrow Tuesday to resubmit them to your blog.

Line assignment submissions:

A ( (A) quality work)

Bg

af

mb

(B) quality work

l(g)r

as

(C) quality work

fd

(C-/ D) Quality work

js

nv

B (A) quality work

bg

af

l(g)r

mb

(B) quality work

as

(C-/ D) quality work

js

fd

nv

C (A) quality work

bg

mb

L(G)R

(C-/ D) quality work

as

fd

nv

js

D ( A) quality work

bg

mb

L(G)R

AS

EL

(C) quality work

fd

(D) quality work

nv

Note:

We will review work on weds. For now, the work above is being graded on the following basis:

Craftmaship

Originality

Creativity

I am also reviewing your ability to follow directions and complete assignments with the purpose of creating an interesting and compelling composition.

The rule I follow is this:

If you are not going to hang the work you made in your living room for a year for everyone to see, then you are not producing your best work.

I can see by the submissions, many of you are rushing the assignment or working without concern for the space the design lives in or following guidelines and rules according to the Principles.

Ask yourself the following:

How am I subdividing Space ?

What kind of balance am I using ?

How is my design showing variety and repetition?

How original is my work , am I coming up with easy solutions or thinking about creating an interesting design?

Am I making an engaging and interesting use of space? ( the space is within the 8x 10 parameter of the 9 x 12 paper)

Am I using the correct materials?

( These assignments are being done on Bristol paper within an 8x10 space on a 9 x12 Bristol paper and using either solid black ink or black acrylic paint.)

How much time am I spending on each assignment?

At the very least each assignment should be a total engagement time of 1.5 to 2 hours each.

Finally, I will allow students to resubmit for a better grade.

You can use the class time tomorrow to do so, add a link to this post once you are finished.

If your work is not listed here is due to one of several reasons:

a) You did not do the work

b) You completed work but using wrong materials or not following instructions.

3) You have no clue what we are doing and need additional directions.

( That is why I ask you if you have any questions at the end of the lecture!)

[jonathankatwhatever]

It’s 22 May 2024. It’s been a weird morning so far. Woke up feeling no connection at all. Began wondering where you are, what you might be doing. Then I see a post about the Cantor set. I know what that is, but I decided to look at it anyway. This is a challenge to my beliefs. You see, the construction method of removing the open sets is the literal opposite of the construction from higher dimensions into the real line. In fact, the idea behind the generalized Cantor set, meaning that you can do the same thing with any definition between 0 and 1, meaning along a 1-0Segment, all that means you construct any version of the reals you want. And that’s usually taken to mean that if you remove the 5ths or whatever, that you keep removing the 5ths, that you can’t layer to make some other pattern, meaning some transcendental.

There was a Metaphoric Bundle in that last line. It included the idea that any artificially random selection will have a pattern. All within 1. Which gets back to CM100, for some reason.

Why? Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!

100 is the gs of 10 which is the construction of SBE3+1 and the construction of Halving/Doubling, meaning 2. Okay, so we have 2*3 is SBE2 and the next prime or 1gs in prime form is 5, which is SBE+1. I remember doing this years ago. So we have the mimicry of form in SBE+1 and SBE3+1.

Another is the 7’s that touch at 50:50, which I type instead of CM50 because they aren’t necessarily the same things. That 7 translates into Hexagonal counting, and in particular the full count of a Hexagon in one sense being 13 to 14, where the count is 6, verify to 7 (or other way round which is 26), and again other way round to 14, thus fully identifying the central bT and thus one side of the fD over which 2 Things invert. Hello.

That’s a model of an interior End relating over the external 1-0Segment to another, using the rotating mirror image. This models why the Informational Limit exists, but I don’t know if I can say it. The idea is that we have a bT and we have this 1-0Segment which relates to another End in another Hexagon, meaning a second Thing, with all the gsSpace created Between them when we take that 1-0Segment and look at it, when we realize that it comes into existence using the above methods. If that isn’t clear, I mean the idea of removing open sets. Open sets are the 0Space to the 1Space endpoints. That’s why you can construct dense and nowhere dense sets: layering of gs process within that 1-0Segment.

Remember, this models at scale, so this means any interaction. This is then why context matters, why fCM matters, why 50:50 matters and thus why it appears in our sensibility as a coin flip. Powerful stuff.

So we have this 1-0Segment which relates to another Thing, another End, and we have a Hexagon attached. This 1-0Segment occurs within a bT, which counts 3, so we know the count must reach 3 at the 1Space counting level. The argument then is that the difference between the observed limit and 3 is due to the fact that this Hexagon is attached.

The mental image is of a V emitting as close as evenly as possible, and the Ends of the 1-0Segment thus being able to read one or the other as leading, thus enabling continuity over the bT, which means it aligns along the Shard axis, which is the orthogonal along which this process operates. I’m trying to say this is the ideal image of the actual messy pathways, the 1Space which relates all Pathways. I guess that is a big deal.

My concentration has been understanding 420, because the +1 to 419 is delicious. That’s 6*7. I have pictured that using gs, adding a row or column and saying this 6*7 represents any of these states. And it’s the count around a Hexagon but multiplicative. I’ve had a tough time visualizing that, but the idea is that you state a Hexagon 6 times to identify that it is that Hexagon. Easy way is to rotate the labels each time. But then what does the 7th iteration do? The best we did before was saying this states the Hexagon to its completeness, meaning that rotation of another turn preserves the prior 6 states within that last twist. I’m seeing something. That means we encode any twisting run of 6, true SBE2, give that a twist and it locks like the opposite of twisting a bottle cap open.

That means the communicative process in this step of 419+1 to 420 lines up meaning within a Hexagon by sending it through SBE2 and locking it, and magnifying it by 10. This relates the bT level of SBE to the SBE2 level to the SBE3 level within the same process because mag10 is SBE3+1. If you see what I see, that means a lot of meanings are available within any packet, which is true in physical terms when you think about what momentum is, especially for a particle with no rest mass. We know photons carry information. This is how it encodes into the photon. And we see in that how the communicative process works. It has to be there because all relationships between 2 Things are 1-0-1.

Oh, I need to mention there that stating 1-0-1 generates I//I. It’s that low or high level. (It’s 2 mints in 1.) We can thus state that I//I can be reproduced within the Cantor set. That is, the Cantor set is constructed using exclusion as the method, and exclusion of defined open sets in particular. Open versus closed at each step requires I//I, generates I//I. Is I//I. It truly generalizes. I was far too rigid in my thinking about I//I being a method to realize that it’s the method used to divide infinities. In religious terms, when God parted the heavens and made the firmament, this is the tool used.

That’s the 420 as of now. The 18 is times 419, and that now works because Attachment Theory has developed a ton since we last did this work. It’s literally SBE3 on each side of the bT, each of the legs of the V. And +1.

The part that remains mysterious is the 200,000. What is the purpose? What is the porpoise, Dorcas? I think that’s it, in that joke. That what comes from the Hexagonal processing needs to Attach and it does that by being available in multiple Attachment forms or ways. Like the signals mean different things in different contexts. Stop may mean wait for reply, could be internal or external, could be minor or significant. Information coming in needs to Attach through that +1, which we can map to the 1-0Segment so this gives the Attachment more room, more potential to Attach. This is a version of very old work, which is interesting if only because I had so much doubt about it before.

This makes clear that it isn’t what one sees, because perceptions are guaranteed to be unique even when similar, but how one interprets at a higher level. Thus my concept of the Jew test, which is embodied by the shockingly simple point that when Israel does better, when Jews do better, the idea is to emulate them so you do better yourselves, and not to look for ways in which Israel, in which Jews fail to be perfect. If you can’t see the basic logical error you make about Jews, then you can’t be saved.

Back to CM100. The concept organizes across scales. That 50:50 becomes more fine-grained as you look. It’s not just to the quantum level of ambiguity, but in the sense that locality doesn’t End. Like rules involving video review identify not just issues with whether you can tell or not, which is an obvious 50:50, but also whether the rule extends to this exact circumstance. Since exact circumstance is mathematically not going to repeat, you never hit the End of your inquiries. You’ll never be able to define an absolute this is or is not a catch because the rules extend, while you can tell if a ball is over the line to the limit of whatever you use to measure.

That’s the general importance and idea of fCM. And it’s also behind a lot of D-structure. As far as I can tell, only D-structure describes the fullness and the finiteness of our existences as tangible and intangible Things.

[arrthurpendragon]

Oh wow! So interesting! You're right it is dark, but her character has come a long way since her creation! Kudos to you!!!!

Since I've been mostly absent for a few months . . . (Since like Christmas)

Reblog this post and spill as many details as you want to about an OC (or OCs) to help me catch up!

[ocappreciation]

Hi, I hope all is well? :) I thought I'd introduce myself to the OC Community. :)

What name you like to go by / pronouns: Hey! My name is Megan and I go by She/Her. I am a 20+ year-old special needs writer from England.

Fandom(s) you create for and/or are interested in: Dying Light, 13 Reasons Why, Until Dawn, The Dark Pictures Anthology, Marvel and Vikings.

What other platforms you share your work on: I'm on Fanfiction.net, Wattpad and AO3.

What are you looking for within the OC Community: I'm hoping to meet some new friends.

How can you help others within the OC Community: I'm happy to read others' fanfics and leave reviews for them. I'm also happy to send questions about OCs and pairings.

[raging-violets]

Thanks @barbychan4ever for all of the reviews on my Riverdale fic!

[waterloou]

Libby Mason moodboard

Requested by @megandaisy9

Request a song and character and I’ll make a moodboard for ya. OCs included

[occommunity]

A 13 Reasons Why/Dying Light OC Fic Poster for @megandaisy9

[bravelittleflower]

oc Halloween challenge - October 5 - Disney Princess AU!

Danielle Baker as Princess Ana of Arendelle

@foxesandmagic

[eddysocs]

It was maybe the happiest birthday she’d ever spent with another person. Harper usually liked to spend her birthday alone, going to see a movie —whatever looked best when she arrived— and treating herself to whatever sugary snack cake she liked the most at the time. She’d done it that way since she was twelve.

But Hannah changed her whole view on birthdays. Though they only got to spend one of Harper's birthdays together, it was one for the record books. Harper had never laughed so hard or felt so free. Hannah was a bright and shining light in her otherwise solitary little world and she opened the outside world to her, whether she meant to or not.

What a shame it was that the highlight of Harper's life had been the beginning of the darkest part of Hannah's. She thought of that often while wishing she was still there with her, gossiping, giggling and passing the time watching old chick flicks and B movies. Throwing popcorn across the room at one another and rushing to clean it up before Hannah's dad spotted the mess.

Hannah had opened the door for new possibilities, and even without her there, Harper would take every one that came her way.

Forever Tag: @baubeautyandthegeek, @kmc1989, @curious-kittens-ocs, @fanficanatic-tw, @gcthvile

Harper Cassidy: @megandaisy9, @boobear729, @ghostsunderstoodmysoul, @freshmoneyalmondathlete

[arrthurpendragon]

❆ ❆ ❆ OC ❆ Ficmas ❆ #33 ❆ ❆ ❆

THE TIE THAT BINDS US by: @eddysocs

Harper Cassidy was Hannah's best friend, or so she thought. Now, mourning her death, she'll connect with the one person who can understand her grief and help her heal; Hannah's very own mother. Hannah is the tie that binds them to each other.

READ AT FFN + AO3

Tag: @ocappreciationtag  ❆ @gritsandbrits  ❆ @booty-boggins   ❆ @trashcankitty12 ❆ @darksideofparis  ❆ @raith-way  ❆ @anotherunreadblog ❆ @vivis-ghost-wife   ❆  @fandomdancer​  ❆  @hoqwaarts  ❆  @zoeliemyers  ❆  @darknightfrombeyond

[jonathankatwhatever]

Still can’t post from my phone. Sorry.

Physical progress rapid. 28 July 2023. I’m seeing labels attach but I’m having trouble keeping the examples in memory, so they’re not quite done. Interesting thought about the Trinity, the three into one Oppenheimer meant, where analysis or theory meets practice. That’s why he was picked; he’d worked with Lawrence, who made the first cyclotron, and his math work led to 2 Nobels, one for the positron, the other for the Lamb shift.

I’m hearing baby hawks on Corey Hill. I’m seeing descriptions of groups in real life. Almost a full story. The reasons why permutations lead to different results, why non-Abelian: the causal chains create spaces or rather cross spaces and these spaces fit together. That sounds simpler than I meant. I mean arrangements of iThings and iObjects need to fit to the potential within Things as they are tethered or Attached to tObjects. This includes a center to a Boundary and back. Or Boundary to center to back.

I’m seeing a distribution. The axis line drops from a tangent to make a Triangular and thus an fD, with differences to ideal. That’s a 13 again. This explains a lot: get off kilter when you think you’re along the axis because the inferred End in the fD is off and because that may shift the End off.

————-

It is now barely 27 July 2023, and I just realized that groups are counting symmetries of the dimensional structures of gs. In other words, not permutations of whatever can be associated but limited to the symmetries which specific D-structures have. That makes sense because these are all gs constructions. It’s that very limited nature which has bugged me, and now I see that the limited nature is there because the manipulation is not at the more associative levels but is strictly limited to these D-structures.

This meets up with Triangular over gs or Togs.

Pushing this further, the idea came to me earlier that we’re an immune response, that the metaphors are part of the response to the problems, to the threats posed by lower D-structures.

————

App won’t let me add a post on my phone. Saw a man playing trumpet for ducks and geese.

[bravelittleflower]

I love it!!😍😍😍

danielle baker: to hurt is as human as to breathe. 

a very belated birthday gift to @iceandwaterfairytail ! hope you like it, babe!!

[ocappreciation]

ocappreciation + secret santa  🎅

↳  to @barbychan4ever → from:  @missjanuarylily

❄️ Vada Lisbon → Looking Too Closely ❄️

[raging-violets]

600 Follower Giveaway: Vada Libson and Hannah Baker for @barbychan4ever [2/2]

Looking Too Closely: Vada Lisbon is the new girl at Liberty High. She befriends the infamous Hannah Baker, and they navigate the hell that is high school together... until tragedy strikes. OC-centric, multiple pairings.