#eu copyright directive article 13

[mostlysignssomeportents]

This day in history

I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me in TUCSON (Mar 9-10), then SAN FRANCISCO (Mar 13), Anaheim, and more!

#20yrsago Mel Gibson: violent, cynical Jew-baiter? https://web.archive.org/web/20040501000000*/http://www.iht.com/articles/110553.html

#15yrsago Excellent public speaking advice https://web.archive.org/web/20090310044557/https://duncandavidson.com/2009/03/dear-speakers.html

#15yrsago Detroit and the future of America https://www.ft.com/content/2b815a94-0863-11de-8a33-0000779fd2ac

#10yrsago Netflix disables Chrome’s developer console https://memex.craphound.com/2014/03/07/netflix-disables-chromes-developer-console/

#10yrsago What happens when you opt your kids out of standardized tests https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/03/standardized-testing-i-opted-my-kids-out-the-schools-freaked-out-now-i-know-why.html

#10yrsago First clinical LSD trial in 40 years shows positive results in easing anxiety of dying patients https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/04/health/lsd-reconsidered-for-therapy.html?referrer=

#5yrsago Ajit Pai has been touting new broadband investment after he murdered Net Neutrality, but he’s been relying on impossible data from a company called Barrierfree https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/03/ajit-pais-rosy-broadband-deployment-claim-may-be-based-on-gigantic-error/

#5yrsago Firefox is getting more browser fingerprinting protection courtesy of Tor Browser’s “letterboxing” technique https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1407366

#5yrsago It’s on: House Democrats introduce their promised Net Neutrality legislation https://www.cnet.com/news/politics/democrats-introduce-save-the-internet-act-to-restore-net-neutrality/

#5yrsago The “Tragedy of the Commons” was invented by a white supremacist based on a false history, and it’s toxic bullshit https://twitter.com/mmildenberger/status/1102604887223750657

#5yrsago The EU hired a company that had been lobbying for the Copyright Directive to make a (completely batshit) video to sell the Copyright Directive https://memex.craphound.com/2019/03/07/the-eu-hired-a-company-that-had-been-lobbying-for-the-copyright-directive-to-make-a-completely-batshit-video-to-sell-the-copyright-directive/

#5yrsago Zuckerberg announces a comprehensive plan for a new, privacy-focused Facebook, but fails to mention data sharing and ad targeting https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-zuckerberg-privacy-pivot/

#1yrago End to End https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/07/disenshittification/#e2e

Name your price for 18 of my DRM-free ebooks and support the Electronic Frontier Foundation with the Humble Cory Doctorow Bundle.

[doineedavpnformyhomenetwork]

can you bypass article 13 with a vpn

🔒🌍✨ Get 3 Months FREE VPN - Secure & Private Internet Access Worldwide! Click Here ✨🌍🔒

can you bypass article 13 with a vpn

Article 13 VPN bypass

Article 13 of the European Union's Copyright Directive has stirred up a lot of controversy since its proposal, particularly regarding its potential impact on internet freedom and online content creation. One of the main concerns surrounding Article 13 is the possibility of increased online censorship and strict copyright regulations that could limit the sharing of creative works on the internet.

As a result, many internet users have started looking for ways to bypass Article 13 restrictions, and one common method that has gained popularity is the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). VPNs work by creating a secure and encrypted connection to a remote server, allowing users to mask their IP addresses and browse the internet anonymously.

By using a VPN, internet users can effectively bypass geo-blocks and access online content that may be restricted in their region due to Article 13 regulations. VPNs can also help users protect their online privacy and data from potential monitoring or tracking by internet service providers or government authorities.

However, it is important to note that while VPNs can be a useful tool for bypassing Article 13 restrictions, they may not always guarantee complete anonymity or protection from legal consequences. Users should be aware of the laws and regulations governing online content sharing in their region and use VPNs responsibly.

Overall, while Article 13 has raised concerns about online censorship and copyright restrictions, the use of VPNs can offer internet users a way to navigate around these limitations and continue to access the content they enjoy online.

Copyright law circumvention VPN

Copyright law circumvention using VPN (Virtual Private Network) is a topic that has drawn significant attention in recent years. VPNs are powerful tools that offer users online privacy and security by encrypting their internet connection and masking their IP address. However, they have also been used to bypass copyright restrictions, allowing users to access region-restricted content and engage in online piracy.

The use of VPNs to circumvent copyright law raises complex legal issues. While VPNs themselves are not illegal, using them to access copyrighted material without permission is considered a violation of copyright law. Content creators, including artists, musicians, filmmakers, and software developers, rely on copyright protection to earn a living from their work. When users bypass copyright restrictions using VPNs, they undermine the rights of these creators and impact their livelihood.

To combat copyright infringement facilitated by VPNs, copyright holders have taken various measures, such as sending cease and desist letters to VPN providers and monitoring online piracy activities. Additionally, some countries have implemented laws and regulations to address copyright infringement through VPNs. For instance, in some jurisdictions, it is illegal to use a VPN to access copyrighted material without authorization.

It is essential for internet users to understand the legal implications of using VPNs for circumventing copyright law. While VPNs offer benefits in terms of online privacy and security, their misuse to infringe copyright can lead to legal consequences. It is crucial for users to respect copyright laws and support content creators by accessing and sharing content through legal channels.

EU Article 13 VPN workaround

Title: Navigating EU Article 13: How VPNs Offer a Workaround

In the wake of the implementation of EU Article 13, which mandates stricter copyright enforcement online, internet users are seeking ways to maintain their online freedoms while staying compliant with the law. One solution gaining traction is the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to navigate the restrictions imposed by Article 13.

EU Article 13, also known as the Copyright Directive, aims to hold online platforms accountable for copyrighted material uploaded by users. While the intention is to protect intellectual property rights, critics argue that it could stifle freedom of expression and creativity online.

VPNs work by encrypting a user's internet connection and rerouting it through a server in a different location, effectively masking the user's IP address and location. This allows users to access content that may be restricted in their country due to copyright laws or other regulations.

By connecting to a VPN server located outside of the EU jurisdiction, users can bypass the restrictions imposed by Article 13 and access content freely. Additionally, VPNs provide an added layer of privacy and security, shielding users from surveillance and potential data breaches.

However, it's important to note that while VPNs offer a workaround for navigating Article 13 restrictions, they are not a foolproof solution. Some online platforms may actively block VPN traffic, making it challenging for users to bypass restrictions. Additionally, using VPNs to circumvent copyright laws may still be considered illegal in some jurisdictions.

As the debate over online copyright enforcement continues, individuals and businesses must stay informed about their rights and responsibilities. While VPNs offer a means of bypassing Article 13 restrictions, users should exercise caution and ensure that their online activities comply with applicable laws and regulations.

VPN legal implications Article 13

Article 13 of the EU Copyright Directive has sparked widespread debate regarding the legal implications for VPN services. The directive aims to hold online platforms accountable for copyright infringement committed by their users. VPNs, or Virtual Private Networks, are widely used tools that allow individuals to encrypt their internet connections and mask their IP addresses, providing increased privacy and security.

However, under Article 13, VPN services could face challenges in circumventing geo-blocked content and copyright enforcement measures. VPN providers may be required to implement measures to prevent users from accessing copyrighted material without authorization, potentially limiting the functionality of VPNs for legitimate users.

Furthermore, the directive could lead to increased pressure on VPN companies to monitor and enforce copyright policies, raising concerns about user privacy and data protection. VPN providers may be compelled to log user activity to comply with legal requirements, compromising the anonymity that many users rely on VPNs to maintain.

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, VPN services must navigate the complexities of complying with Article 13 while upholding user privacy and security. Users should stay informed about the implications of the directive on VPN usage and consider the potential impact on their online activities. Ultimately, the intersection of VPN services and copyright law under Article 13 raises important questions about digital rights, freedom of expression, and the future of online privacy.

Online content restriction evasion VPN

Title: Unlocking Online Content: The Power of VPNs in Evasion

In an era where accessing online content has become both a necessity and a challenge, Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have emerged as indispensable tools for evading content restrictions. From bypassing geographical limitations to ensuring privacy and security, VPNs offer a myriad of benefits to users worldwide.

One of the primary functions of VPNs is to mask the user's IP address, effectively tricking websites into believing that the user is accessing them from a different location. This feature is particularly useful for bypassing geo-blocked content, such as streaming services, which often limit access to specific regions due to licensing agreements. With a VPN, users can connect to servers in different countries, granting them unrestricted access to a vast array of content.

Moreover, VPNs encrypt the user's internet traffic, providing an additional layer of security against cyber threats such as hacking, surveillance, and data theft. By routing data through secure servers, VPNs shield users from potential intrusions, safeguarding their sensitive information from prying eyes.

Furthermore, VPNs enable users to circumvent censorship imposed by governments or internet service providers (ISPs). In regions where online freedom is restricted, VPNs serve as vital tools for accessing blocked websites and communication platforms, allowing individuals to exercise their right to information and expression.

However, while VPNs offer numerous advantages, it's essential for users to choose reputable providers that prioritize privacy and adhere to strict no-logs policies. Additionally, users should be aware of potential legal implications associated with bypassing content restrictions in certain jurisdictions.

In conclusion, VPNs play a pivotal role in evasion online content restrictions, empowering users to access the internet freely and securely. By harnessing the capabilities of VPN technology, individuals can unlock a world of information and entertainment, transcending geographical barriers and safeguarding their digital privacy.

[synonymouswithanonymous]

about art

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/copyright-reform-questions-and-answers#:~:text=They make sure that all,%2C caricature%2C parody and pastiche.

"The Directive allows users to use content freely for purposes of quotation, criticism, review, caricature, parody and pastiche."

A pastiche is a work of visual art, literature, theatre, music, or architecture that imitates the style or character of the work of one or more other artists. Unlike parody, pastiche pays homage to the work it imitates, rather than mocking it.-wiki

"Pastiche is one of the newer harmonized user rights in EU copyright law. The exception for caricature, parody and pastiche was made mandatory as part of Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) in 2019." https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2023/03/13/the-pastiche-in-copyright-law-towards-a-european-right-to-remix/

For the USA the laws are slightly more relaxed. So to demonstrate the law in practical usage terms I will use Weird Al Y as an example.

https://www.stadleriplaw.com/blog/weirdal

"Although Weird Al's re-recordings are near melodic copies of the original recordings, they do not violate the copyright owner's rights. Since "Weird Al's" songs meet the required aspects to define a parody, he is not required by law to get permission. He also does not need to pay the creator of the original song."

And although weird al cites sources, in the USA he's not legally required to do so. Nor in Europe.

I kept seeing this argument, got tired of zero people actually putting up the laws, so researched, and here it is. Now the USA laws do seem a bit unfair to the original artist, same music but different lyrics, but the first artist isn't paid. I thought for sure he would be paying royalties at least. But nope. But I don't make the laws. The actress in question over this subject hasn't violated any laws in Europe or the USA. I think continued claims of theft are libelous and wrong. I mean get over it and let it go. It just makes me think The only reason this is used against her is bc of who she's dating. Misogyny is real, and just another excuse they use to be misogynistic towards this woman. It is bullying and libel. They've also come after her for so many other things, her hair, weight, eyebrows, feet, etc. So it shouldn't surprise me that stories are made up about her, but it does. And it's all swallowed down so happily bc some people are so thirsty for any excuse to hate.

The law is the law. Art is art, if people are inspired by it so be it. Let artists be artists. Choose to see the good in people and their intentions without judgement, stop looking for the bad.

Or that's all you will find. I also don't think it's right to try to trash someone's reputation online and call them a thief when they are not. Or call them a plagiarist when they are not. She's an actress that went to an arts based school, I'm sure she's aware of all the artistic lines she can and cannot cross.

So if you've ever been inspired by art and wanted to do something similar, or use elements from that piece, you are in the clear. The above laws and Fair Use say it's ok to get your art on!

If you've ever made a GIF, meme, clip splice, fanfiction, YouTube video, tiktok, musical, moodboard, collages, or downloaded a pic and shared it, under fair use/pastiche/parody laws, you're in the clear too. Keep on rocking content!

Fair use laws are meant to protect creativity, not stifle it.

[waterlilly37]

YouTube is Changing: Article 13 Explained

Colin and Samir’s Video Description:

With Europe's new copyright directive and Article 13, YouTube could change drastically. Here's our breakdown. 

Listen to Colin and Samir’s Podcast: iTunes: https://apple.co/2K1pYhu 

Check out Phil Defranco's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFROh... 

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2OnTmBC

The Gear Colin and Samir use to make their videos: https://kit.com/colinandsamir 

The Skateboards Colin and Samir make: https://boardies.us/products/the-classic 

Follow Colin and Samir on Twitter: http://Twitter.com/ColinandSamir 

Follow Colin and Samir on Instagram:  http://instagram.com/colinandsamir 

Colin - http://instagram.com/colinrosenblum 

Samir - http://instagram.com/samirchaudry 

The Breakdown with Colin and Samir is a show on YouTube that analyzes and explains what's happening on YouTube. It's Vox meets Philip DeFranco meets Last Week Tonight with John Oliver.

#thebreakdown 

SEND COLIN and SAMIR A STORY to colinandsamir@gmail.com

[one-time-i-dreamt]

Is there a sliver of hope?

[circuittheworld]

Thanks, EU Government

Posting this now whilst I still can

[chenria]

The new copyright directive of the EU just passed the final vote. With all the bad articles 11, 12 and 13... 

This won’t mean immediate change since the various countries have about 2 years to implement the stuff into their national laws...  But in 2 years... who knows what will happen.

The sites (every site there ever is with user generated content) must do all what’s in their power to prevent copyright infringement. And if a copyright claim is made and someone finds their efforts were not strong enough they get sued (as well as the person uploading because seriously... who believes the uploader is out of the question is nuts...).  So... how to prevent uploads? By filters most likely because everything else is unrealistic. You could also license everything there is... good luck trying. And filters will overblock just to be “safe”... 

Filters don’t understand memes and remixes and fan-generated content.  The EU doesn’t have a “fair use” concept... 

Nobody is against copyright... but not like this. Not for the sake of free speech because, let’s face it. This filter mechanism has all the best potential to be used to filter content you don’t want to go public. Censorship! 

I don’t know what will happen in 2 years... I have no idea how fanart and fanfic will be effected...  I am truly angry and sad because EU politicians seem 90% lobby-bought and don’t care about anything the people want. They never even listened to any of the arguments and suggestions of people who know how the internet works...

And countless experts (real experts) told them the thing is a bad idea... but big publishers just want to “YouTube/Google and Facebook need to pay more”... while YouTube and Facebook will be the winners in the end (they already have the filter technology and can sell it to others) and they have the money to implement more... 

They managed to make me refuse the idea of the EU... 

[aquaticresources]

Why has Tumblr gone quiet about Article 13?

It’s still relevant, and here’s why.

Article 13 is once again going into its final stage of voting, this time much worse than before. While the EU commission claims it won’t hamper freedom of expression, a lot of people are fairly certain it will because upload filters are still mandatory, and we all know how bad things can get (see: Tumblr’s adult content filter).

The entire situation surrounding the new copyright directive is problematic. As it turns out, Audible Magic, a company that sells filters, has been lobbying for this since 2016. Thing is, they claim that their upload filters won’t return false positives (we all know that’s a pile of bs) and that they’re fairly cheap (which is also bs).

If you’re in the EU, please use this site to contact your MEPS. Remember to send a PERSONAL message. This way, you have a higher chance of convincing your MEPs to vote AGAINST Article 13. 

If you’re not in the EU, please do everything you can to get your European friends and acquaintances informed.

I’d also highly recommend following Julia Reda (@Senficon) on Twitter for updates. She’s done a great job at keeping us informed on the situation and what we can do to stop Article 13.

Also, if you’re able to, consider joining the demonstrations. You can find exact dates and locations on this site.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

This day in history

I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me TONIGHT in PHOENIX (Changing Hands, Feb 29) then Tucson (Mar 10-11), San Francisco (Mar 13), and more!

#15yrsago Amazon supplier loses warehouse lease, invites the public to loot its books https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/4863490/Books-given-away-for-free-at-one-of-Britains-biggest-warehouses.html</a.

#10yrsago Putin launches Russian invasion of Ukraine; UN security council meets https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/01/crimea-crisis-deepens-as-russia-and-ukraine-ready-forces-live-updates

#10yrsago Disney drops $4.8M in Boy Scouts funding over anti-gay policy https://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/28/us/disney-pulls-boy-scouts-funding/index.html

#10yrsago South Carolina legislature confiscates budget of college for assigning Alison Bechdel’s “Fun Home” as a reading https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0228/Alison-Bechdel-s-memoir-Fun-Home-runs-into-trouble-with-the-South-Carolina-House-of-Representatives

#10yrsago TSA agents demand bag-search to look for “Bitcoins” https://web.archive.org/web/20140302025836/https://dailyanarchist.com/2014/02/24/the-tsa-is-looking-for-bitcoin/

#5yrsago University of California system libraries break off negotiations with Elsevier, will no longer order their journals https://www.science.org/content/article/university-california-boycotts-publishing-giant-elsevier-over-journal-costs-and-open

#5yrsago German Data Privacy Commissioner warns at new Copyright Directive will increase the tech oligopoly, make EU companies dependent on US filter vendors, and subject Europeans to surveillance by US companies https://torrentfreak.com/german-data-privacy-commissioner-sounds-alarm-over-upload-filter-oligopoly-190301/

[in-sempiternam]

Aaaaand here we go 🙄😒

[its-leifr-for-now]

how nobody talks about the new EU copyright decree

[timeturner-jay]

Today is a dark day for our future.

I wish I was exaggerating with that title, but regrettably, I am not.

If you're from Europe, you will have heard about Article 13 - the new copyright directive that internet users have been fighting against tooth and nail for the past year.

More than 5.000.000. people from across the EU nations have signed a petition pleading against it. Hundreds of thousands have joined protests in many different countries and cities.

And today, as of the 26th of March 2019, the EU parliament has passed Article 13 and all the others that went along with it, in spite of the will of the people.

I'm not sure how to describe the way I feel - for months now, I have desperately done everything I could to do my part in stopping this, and after the EU-wide protests on March 23rd, I was positive that we had made a difference.

In the end, it meant nothing the the majority of the politicians who lead this union.

I'm not sure what we're going to do now; the next steps are still being discussed.

However, here are some things you should not do, no matter how desperate you might feel:

- (Don't) harm yourself. I know the situation feels hopeless right now, but we need to live to fight another day.

- (Don't) resort to violence. We are better than that, and turning into an angry mob isn't going to help our position any.

- (DON'T) vote for the same assholes again. EU elections are coming up. Make sure to go and vote - look up the people who are responsible for this, and make sure that your vote does not go to them. Make your feelings about their decisions known to them. We have the power here.

- (AND ABSOLUTELY DON'T) vote for a right wing party instead. The last thing we need right now is them gaining more power. Don't lose faith in the EU. It's not a bad concept, and we're stronger together. We just need to make sure we are lead by people who are actually interested in our future, and let me promise you, right wing parties are not. Don't give them your vote just as an act of rebellion.

This is a dark day indeed, but don't lose hope yet. As they say, it is always darkest before the dawn. There will be more protests, and there will be ways we can protect what we have here. We'll be fine somehow, as long as we stick together and don't allow this to divide us.

[ed-nygma]

[theweirder-thebetter]

PSA ON ARTICLE 13:

The European Parliament has said "Yes" to the Copyright Directive on March 26th 2019.

We may have two years until it becomes national law.

The European Parliament vote is on May 26th 2019. Use your voice (vote) and show them, who you are voting for. We won't forget this, dear CDU/CSU (Germany). You were the reason this got in motion. We won't vote for you ever again.

[effelants]

Article 13 is on my dash again and they're saying they changed it? Is that true? Sorry to bother you with this, but you seem to know what you're talking about

Okay, out of the group of messages in my inbox about this, I’m going to reply to this one and I’m going to do it succinctly. I don’t have the time or energy to really get into this again on tumblr -- don’t worry, though, I don’t mind you guys asking. :) Even so, I’m not going to get into it in any detail. I’m sorry I can’t be more helpful -- I just can’t put in the energy to make a properly sourced post about this, even though you guys absolutely deserve one. It bit me in the ass the last time I did, and I’m unwilling to relive the experience. 

I will, however, say the following:

First of all, just to reiterate: I still feel as I always did -- our fandoms are as safe as they have ever been in the first place. The directive does not now nor will it in any way redefine what is and isn’t considered copyright infringement. Fan-generated content utilizing the intellectual property of the creators still remains in the legal gray area of international copyright law, erring more on the side of allowed, at least as far as nonprofit use is concerned. That is nothing new.

Now, on to your question: yes, the directive has changed as part of the natural process of implementing EU legislation, but it has actually changed for the better. A lot of my original qualms with the directive (which were never very dire to begin with and were very much different from other people’s qualms with it; please see my “law shit” tag if you’d like a more comprehensive overview of how I have felt about the directive in the past because I’m not going to reiterate it here) have, to my knowledge, been solved or at least lessened.

In addition, to address another issue asked by another anon, this still remains a directive. That has not changed, nor can it change. That means that this is not being implemented like-right-now-tomorrow-next-week. That’s not how directives work; they are not directly applicable legislation the moment they pass. Instead, a directive sets parameters for future legislation in EU countries and gives them a certain timeline during which they must implement the required changes to their own legislation to meet the demands being set forth. This timeline is usually a year or two, at the very least, and many countries often take longer than the set timeline to implement those changes, anyway. Changing law is often a very slow business.

Don’t listen to sensationalism. This is not a black and white issue, and do not trust anyone who tries to make it out to be such. Please seek out unbiased sources where possible, and, where not possible, read everything regarding this debate with a grain of salt and keeping in mind where the interests of the writer lie. If anyone tries to tell you that this is The End Of Memes or The Fandom Apocalypse, they’re either misinformed or trying to further an agenda.

Your best bet is to seek out sources that describe both sides of the discussion without heated rhetoric, as those sources are more likely to provide you with a comprehensive view of the situation. If, after that, you still disagree with the directive -- and you might! -- you’re more than welcome to do so and more than welcome to take any steps available to you to try to do something about it. Just, please, do not do it on the basis of misinformation.

I remain unworried, as both an EU citizen and a future lawyer.

As always, all of the above is my personal, subjective opinion, does not constitute any kind of legal advice and is not meant to insinuate that I have some kind of divine knowledge on this subject.

[nysanormalna]

eu copyright directive

i can't reblog the original post for whatever reason but i saw it on my dash today so i thought i'd explain a few things

this post:

all of this is late, the months refer to june-july of 2018. the final vote was held in march 2019 and the directive was passed.

what is happening now is the countries have a 2 year time window to implement content filter laws at national level and since it's a directive they have some creative freedom to how and to what extent to do that. don't contact your eu representatives, contact your parliament. they're the ones that decide what gets to happen now.

at least in poland there's parliament elections this autumn so if you want to contact your politicians and/or protest the best time would be now. if you pressure them into promising a fair or smaller scale of impact filter law before the elections, there's a chance you'll actually get it.

on may 20th edri and 41 other organizations sent an open letter to the european commission asking for inclusion of civil society during implementing of the copyright law so if that bears some fruit we'll hear about that, so far the situation is stated as above though.

contact your politicians, make sure your friends and family are informed on the current situation, check who voted for the directive during the final vote and don't vote for them in the upcoming autumn elections. try to google this once in a while if you don't watch news so you have current information that's not from tumblr posts floating around (because those often get outdated before they blow up)

also if you're from one of those countries that had most members of the eu parliament vote for passing of the directive i'm sorry but get a decent vpn